DOCSLIB.ORG

Fieldwork Dates : 15Th- 18Th May 2008 Q. You May Be Aware That a By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fieldwork Dates : 15Th- 18Th May 2008 Q. You May Be Aware That a By CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 9 Q. You may be aware that a by-election will be held in Crewe & Nantwich on 22 May following the death of Gwyneth Dunwoody. How likely or not do you think you are to vote in the by-election on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1= Certain NOT to vote through to 10=absolutely certain to vote? Base : All GENDER AGE EMPLOYMENT STATUS Looking after Permanentl Full time home/ y sick/ Total Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Employed Unemployed student Retired family disabled Other Unweighted Base 1001 492 509 88 175 203 183 153 199 613 30 31 228 62 19 18 Weighted Base 1001 491 510 111 169 173 197 176 173 631 30 30 160 70 50 30 10 - Absolutely certain 617 299 318 24 93 102 130 134 134 374 14 8 122 45 31 23 to vote 62% 61% 62% 22% 55% 59% 66% 76% 77% 59% 48% 26% 76% 64% 63% 76% 9 39 19 19 5 5 7 7 9 5 24 1 3 6 2 - 3 4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% 3% 4% 3% 9% 4% 3% - 11% 8 71 38 33 16 13 12 14 9 8 48 2 3 8 6 2 2 7% 8% 7% 14% 8% 7% 7% 5% 5% 8% 8% 10% 5% 8% 4% 6% 7 34 14 21 8 5 11 7 1 2 20 1 2 2 3 7 - 3% 3% 4% 7% 3% 7% 3% 1% 1% 3% 2% 7% 1% 4% 14% - 6 25 11 14 6 4 6 3 4 1 13 3 2 3 2 2 - 2% 2% 3% 5% 2% 4% 2% 2% 1% 2% 10% 7% 2% 3% 4% - 5 66 32 34 12 14 15 12 5 9 52 1 - 8 6 - - 7% 7% 7% 10% 8% 9% 6% 3% 5% 8% 2% - 5% 8% - - 4 6 3 3 2 1 1 - 2 - 1 - 3 - - - 2 1% 1% 1% 2% * * - 1% - * - 10% - - - 6% 3 12 5 7 5 2 3 1 - 1 7 1 2 1 - - - 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% - * 1% 5% 7% * - - - 2 7 5 2 1 3 - 3 - - 7 - - - - - - 1% 1% * 1% 2% - 2% - - 1% - - - - - - 1 - Certain not to vote 125 65 60 33 30 16 20 12 14 86 6 7 11 7 8 - 13% 13% 12% 30% 17% 9% 10% 7% 8% 14% 21% 24% 7% 9% 16% - Mean 7.99 7.92 8.05 5.54 7.39 8.05 8.28 8.92 8.81 7.82 6.94 5.99 8.85 8.31 7.93 9.41 Standard Deviation 3.16 3.23 3.10 3.56 3.51 2.92 2.99 2.49 2.66 3.26 3.70 3.59 2.55 2.85 3.27 1.48 Prepared by ComRes * = Less than .5 CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 10 Q. You may be aware that a by-election will be held in Crewe & Nantwich on 22 May following the death of Gwyneth Dunwoody. How likely or not do you think you are to vote in the by-election on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1= Certain NOT to vote through to 10=absolutely certain to vote? Base : All Q3Q1 VOTING INTENTION Total Conservative Labour Lib Dem UKIP Green SNP Plaid Cymru BNP Other Unweighted Base 1001 365 255 89 8 1 - - 2 25 Weighted Base 1001 354 257 90 11 1 - - 2 25 10 - Absolutely certain 617 282 181 60 10 1 - - 1 13 to vote 62% 80% 71% 67% 91% 100% - - 40% 53% 9 39 18 8 3 1 - - - - 2 4% 5% 3% 4% 9% - - - - 9% 8 71 30 24 7 - - - - - 2 7% 8% 9% 8% - - - - - 7% 7 34 8 15 4 - - - - - 2 3% 2% 6% 4% - - - - - 9% 6 25 4 11 2 - - - - - 1 2% 1% 4% 2% - - - - - 4% 5 66 12 18 14 - - - - 1 4 7% 3% 7% 15% - - - - 60% 18% 4 6 - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - 3 12 - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - 2 7 - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - 1 - Certain not to vote 125 - - - - - - - - - 13% - - - - - - - - - Mean 7.99 9.50 9.09 8.83 9.91 10.00 - - 6.98 8.43 Standard Deviation 3.16 1.17 1.59 1.89 0.30 - - - 3.35 2.00 Prepared by ComRes * = Less than .5 CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 12 Q. In the coming by-election, do you think you will vote Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem or for another party? Base : All respondents saying 5-10 likely to vote GENDER AGE EMPLOYMENT STATUS Looking after Permanentl Full time home/ y sick/ Total Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Employed Unemployed student Retired family disabled Other Unweighted Base 857 417 440 56 139 178 161 142 181 516 22 19 211 56 16 17 Weighted Base 851 413 439 70 134 153 173 162 159 529 22 18 148 63 42 28 Conservative 341 154 187 19 55 60 68 74 65 219 5 5 66 26 8 14 40% 37% 43% 28% 41% 39% 39% 46% 41% 41% 21% 26% 44% 41% 18% 49% Labour 178 93 84 11 28 33 40 42 24 104 9 3 28 16 15 3 21% 23% 19% 15% 21% 21% 23% 26% 15% 20% 42% 15% 19% 25% 36% 10% Lib Dem 76 37 39 12 17 12 13 8 15 50 - 3 9 7 3 3 9% 9% 9% 18% 12% 8% 7% 5% 9% 10% - 15% 6% 12% 8% 11% UKIP 10 8 2 - 1 1 1 3 4 2 - - 1 2 3 2 1% 2% * - 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% * - - * 4% 8% 6% Green 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - * * - - - - 1% - - * - - - - - - BNP 2 1 1 - - 1 - 1 - 2 - - - - - - * * * - - 1% - 1% - * - - - - - - Other 25 13 12 6 7 3 - 5 5 16 3 2 4 1 - - 3% 3% 3% 8% 5% 2% - 3% 3% 3% 12% 11% 2% 2% - - Refused 56 27 29 1 5 9 15 10 16 30 2 - 14 3 5 2 7% 7% 7% 2% 3% 6% 9% 6% 10% 6% 9% - 9% 5% 11% 6% Don't know 161 78 83 20 22 35 35 19 30 105 4 6 27 8 8 5 19% 19% 19% 29% 16% 23% 20% 12% 19% 20% 16% 32% 18% 12% 19% 17% Prepared by ComRes * = Less than .5 CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 16 Q. Do you think these politicians are an asset or liability for their party? Conservative leader : David Cameron Base : All GENDER AGE EMPLOYMENT STATUS Looking after Permanentl Full time home/ y sick/ Total Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Employed Unemployed student Retired family disabled Other Unweighted Base 1001 492 509 88 175 203 183 153 199 613 30 31 228 62 19 18 Weighted Base 1001 491 510 111 169 173 197 176 173 631 30 30 160 70 50 30 Asset 524 263 261 51 88 93 103 103 86 359 14 10 74 41 8 19 52% 54% 51% 46% 52% 53% 52% 58% 50% 57% 48% 33% 46% 58% 15% 62% Liability 150 88 62 14 33 21 29 30 24 89 4 10 24 9 10 4 15% 18% 12% 12% 19% 12% 15% 17% 14% 14% 12% 32% 15% 13% 20% 14% Neither 201 90 111 32 31 38 45 23 33 117 5 5 38 11 22 4 20% 18% 22% 29% 18% 22% 23% 13% 19% 18% 18% 18% 23% 15% 43% 12% Don't know 126 49 77 15 17 22 21 21 30 66 7 5 24 10 11 4 13% 10% 15% 13% 10% 12% 11% 12% 18% 10% 22% 17% 15% 14% 21% 12% Prepared by ComRes * = Less than .5 CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 17 Q. Do you think these politicians are an asset or liability for their party? Conservative leader : David Cameron Base : All Q3Q1 VOTING INTENTION Total Conservative Labour Lib Dem UKIP Green SNP Plaid Cymru BNP Other Unweighted Base 1001 365 255 89 8 1 - - 2 25 Weighted Base 1001 354 257 90 11 1 - - 2 25 Asset 524 291 95 40 5 1 - - 1 7 52% 82% 37% 44% 43% 100% - - 60% 26% Liability 150 10 73 19 1 - - - 1 8 15% 3% 28% 21% 9% - - - 40% 30% Neither 201 39 58 23 5 - - - - 8 20% 11% 23% 26% 47% - - - - 33% Don't know 126 14 31 8 - - - - - 3 13% 4% 12% 9% - - - - - 11% Prepared by ComRes * = Less than .5 CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 18 Q. Do you think these politicians are an asset or liability for their party? Labour leader : Gordon Brown Base : All GENDER AGE EMPLOYMENT STATUS Looking after Permanentl Full time home/ y sick/ Total Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Employed Unemployed student Retired family disabled Other Unweighted Base 1001 492 509 88 175 203 183 153 199 613 30 31 228 62 19 18 Weighted Base 1001 491 510 111 169 173 197 176 173 631 30 30 160 70 50 30 Asset 127 80 47 24 23 15 16 22 27 65 3 4 30 7 14 4 13% 16% 9% 22% 14% 9% 8% 12% 15% 10% 9% 14% 19% 10% 29% 14% Liability 603 311 292 59 101 106 128 111 98 403 18 17 84 37 23 20 60% 63% 57% 53% 60% 61% 65% 63% 56% 64% 61% 57% 52% 53% 46% 68% Neither 180 69 111 16 35 34 41 29 25 118 4 5 31 15 7 - 18% 14% 22% 14% 21% 20% 21% 17% 14% 19% 15% 16% 19% 21% 15% - Don't know 91 31 60 13 10 18 13 14 24 44 4 4 16 11 5 5 9% 6% 12% 11% 6% 10% 6% 8% 14% 7% 15% 13% 10% 16% 11% 18% Prepared by ComRes * = Less than .5 CREWE & NANTWICH POLL Fieldwork dates : 15th- 18th May 2008 Table 19 Q.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • PSA Awards 2005
    POLITICAL STUDIES ASSOCIATION AWARDS 2005 29 NOVEMBER 2005 Institute of Directors, 116 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5ED Political Studies Association Awards 2005 Sponsors The Political Studies Association wishes to thank the sponsors of the 2005 Awards: Awards Judges Event Organisers Published in 2005 by Edited by Professor John Benyon Political Studies Association: Political Studies Association Professor Jonathan Tonge Professor Neil Collins Jack Arthurs Department of Politics Dr Catherine McGlynn Dr Catherine Fieschi Professor John Benyon University of Newcastle Professor John Benyon Professor Charlie Jeffery Dr Justin Fisher Newcastle upon Tyne Jack Arthurs Professor Wyn Grant Professor Ivor Gaber NE1 7RU Professor Joni Lovenduski Professor Jonathan Tonge Designed by Professor Lord Parekh Tel: 0191 222 8021 www.infinitedesign.com Professor William Paterson Neil Stewart Associates: Fax: 0191 222 3499 Peter Riddell Eileen Ashbrook e-mail: [email protected] Printed by Neil Stewart Yvonne Le Roux Potts Printers Liz Parkin www.psa.ac.uk Miriam Sigler Marjorie Thompson Copyright © Political Studies Association. All rights reserved Registered Charity no. 1071825 Company limited by guarantee in England and Wales no. 3628986 A W ARDS • 2004 Welcome I am delighted to welcome you to the Political Studies Association 2005 Awards. This event offers a rare opportunity to celebrate the work of academics, politicians and journalists. The health of our democracy requires that persons of high calibre enter public life. Today we celebrate the contributions made by several elected parliamentarians of distinction. Equally, governments rely upon objective and analytical research offered by academics. Today’s event recognizes the substantial contributions made by several intellectuals who have devoted their careers to the conduct of independent and impartial study.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Who Needs It?
    The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Who Needs It? British Journal of Politics and International Relation (2007), vol.9, no.1, pp.138-157. Alexandra Kelso Department of Politics and International Relations, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. [email protected] Abstract Modernisation has been rhetorically important for the Labour government since 1997, and it found a dedicated outlet through the House of Commons Modernisation Committee. This committee has pursued a particular type of modernisation, which this article seeks to explore. It does this by focusing on three issues. First, it examines the role of the Leader of the House of Commons in the chair of the Modernisation Committee. Second, it looks at the work of the Modernisation Committee in comparison to that of the Procedure Committee. Finally, it contextualises the discussion of modernisation with reference to the distinction between efficiency reforms and effectiveness reforms, and explores what this reveals about the complexity of executive–legislative relations at Westminster, and about the course of the modernisation debate since 1997. Introduction New Labour came to power in 1997 committed to a modernising agenda informed by its adherence to the so-called Third Way, and its promise of renewing social democracy (Giddens 1998 and 2000; Clift 2001). The discourse of the Third Way signified a ‘reconfiguration of relationships between economy and state, public and private, government and people’, in which ‘modernisation was a label attached to a wide-range of institutional reforms, including those of government, party and the political process itself’ (Newman 2001, 40).
    [Show full text]
  • Youth and Local Community Engagement in Devon in the 1960S: Voluntary Sector Or State Control After the Albemarle Report?
    Youth and Local Community Engagement in Devon in the 1960s: Voluntary Sector or State Control after the Albemarle Report? Submitted by Lyndy Pooley to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History In December 2019 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank Mark Jackson who has given me encouragement and supportive criticism over the years, and helped me to believe in myself. His humour and kindness cannot be underestimated. Secondly, I would like to thank Matthias Reiss for his enduring support and encouraging words, and for occasionally challenging me when I needed it. I would also like to thank the interviewees for this research who made me laugh, inspired me and not only answered my questions, but provided me with insights, photographs, books, pamphlets and other primary sources which have added unique perspectives and information to this thesis. I would also like to thank the staff at the Devon and North Devon Records Offices for their kind help in sourcing the many elusive local authority records that I needed to find, and suggesting others I didn’t know existed. And thanks also go to my family and friends who gave me encouragement and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard New Politics Book
    New Politics, New Parliament? A review of parliamentary modernisation since 1997 Alex Brazier, Matthew Flinders and Declan McHugh Hansard Society 2005 New Politics, New Parliament? A review of parliamentary modernisation since 1997 Text and graphics © Hansard Society 2005 Published by the Hansard Society, LSE, 9 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6XF Tel: 0207 395 4000, Fax: 0207 395 4008, [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the Hansard Society. The Hansard Society is an independent, non-partisan educational charity, which exists to promote effective parliamentary democracy. The Hansard Society’s Parliament and Government Programme works on all issues relating to the reform of Parliament, engagement between Parliament and the public and promoting effective parliamentary government through a range of conferences, publications, public and private meetings. We set the agenda on parliamentary reform through our work with parliamentarians and others to improve the operation of parliamentary government and encourage greater accessibility and closer engagement with the public. For information about other Hansard Society publications visit our website at www.hansardsociety.org.uk The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. The Hansard Society, as an independent non-party organisation, is neither for nor against. The Society is, however, happy to publish these views and to invite analysis and discussion of them. ISBN 0 900432 62 4 Cover design and photography by Ross Ferguson Printed and bound in Great Britain by Banjo Design & Print Limited Authors Alex Brazier is Senior Research Fellow on the Parliament and Government Programme, Hansard Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Political Institutions: the Case of Constitutional Reform in Britain
    ANALYSING POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS: THE CASE OF CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN BRITAIN BEN SEYD School of Politics University of Kent February 2010 This is a working paper and not to be quoted. Comments are very welcome: [email protected] Abstract Over the last ten years, Britain has undergone major reform of its political system, encompassing the territorial organisation of power, the method of electing representatives, the nature of the legislature, the role of the judiciary, the status and operation of political parties, the scrutiny and oversight of the executive and the allocation of policy competences between elected and unelected actors. For political analysts, two questions arise from these changes: what caused the reforms, and what are their effects? This paper focuses on the latter. A light industry of research has been devoted to the British reforms. However, much of this work is descriptive or only lightly analytical; little attention has been paid in theoretical terms to the way the new institutions will work and their implications for policy decisions. Yet there is a well-developed literature, based on abstract or rational choice models of politics, devoted to the role and effects of political institutions. The paper draws on this literature to provide an account of the likely effects of institutional reform in Britain. Words: 11,773 1 Over the past decade, the British state has undergone a profound restructuring. Political authority has been decentralised to new tiers of government, the judiciary has been granted more extensive powers to review government actions, new systems for electing public representatives have been introduced, the membership of the second chamber has been recast, access to official information has been liberalised, power over monetary policy has been delegated to an independent agency and the financing of political parties has been formalised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945
    The Speaker of the House of Commons: The Office and Its Holders since 1945 Matthew William Laban Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 1 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I, Matthew William Laban, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of this thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: Details of collaboration and publications: Laban, Matthew, Mr Speaker: The Office and the Individuals since 1945, (London, 2013). 2 ABSTRACT The post-war period has witnessed the Speakership of the House of Commons evolving from an important internal parliamentary office into one of the most recognised public roles in British political life. This historic office has not, however, been examined in any detail since Philip Laundy’s seminal work entitled The Office of Speaker published in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the House of Commons
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06651, 21 August 2018 Women in the House of By Richard Kelly Commons Contents: 1. Women sitting in the House of Commons 2. Long Service 3. Women’s right to vote and to stand for election 4. Women as Members of Parliament 5. Equalisation of voting age 6. Office holders: firsts 7. Recent Developments in Women’s Representation 8. Further reading www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Women in the House of Commons Contents Summary 3 1. Women sitting in the House of Commons 4 Table 1: Number of female MPs by party in the 2017 Parliament and in the 2015 Parliament 4 Table 2: Women Members elected at General Elections: 1918-2017 5 2. Long Service 6 3. Women’s right to vote and to stand for election 7 4. Women as Members of Parliament 8 4.1 Eligibility to stand 8 4.2 Election of the first women Members 8 4.3 Women Legislators 9 5. Equalisation of voting age 10 6. Office holders: firsts 11 6.1 Women Ministers 11 6.2 Women Prime Ministers 11 6.3 Woman Speaker 11 6.4 Committees 12 7. Recent Developments in Women’s Representation 13 7.1 Legislation 13 8. Further reading 14 8.1 Library briefings 14 8.2 Other parliamentary publications 14 Cover page image copyright: UK Parliament 3 Commons Library Briefing, 21 August 2018 Summary At the General Election of June 2017, 208 women were elected as Members of Parliament. Of the 87 new members elected to Parliament for the first time in 2017, 33 were women.
    [Show full text]
  • Psa Awards Winners 2000, 2003 - 2016
    PSA AWARDS WINNERS 2000, 2003 - 2016 AWARDS TO POLITICIANS Politician of the Year Sadiq Khan (2016) George Osborne (2015) Theresa May (2014) John Bercow (2012) Alex Salmond (2011) David Cameron and Nick Clegg (2010) Barack Obama (2009) Boris Johnson (2008) Alex Salmond (2007) David Cameron (2006) Tony Blair (2005) Gordon Brown (2004) Ken Livingstone (2003) Lifetime Achievement in Politics Gordon Brown (2016) Harriet Harman (2015) David Blunkett (2014) Jack Straw (2013) Sir Richard Leese (2012) Bill Morris (2012) Chris Patten (2012) David Steel (2011) Michael Heseltine (2011) Neil Kinnock (2010) Geoffrey Howe (2010) Rhodri Morgan (2009) Ian Paisley (2009) Paddy Ashdown (2007) Prof John Hume (2006) Lord David Trimble (2006) Sir Tam Dalyell (2005) Kenneth Clarke QC (2004) Baroness Williams of Crosby (2003) Dr Garrett Fitzgerald (2003) Roy Jenkins (2000) Denis Healey (2000) Edward Heath (2000) Special Award for Lifetime Achievement in Politics Aung San Suu Kyi (2007) 1 Opposition Politician of the Year Theresa May (2003) Parliamentarian of the Year Baroness Smith of Basildon (2016) Sarah Wollaston (2015) Nicola Sturgeon (2014) Natascha Engel (2013) Margaret Hodge (2012) Ed Balls (2011) Patrick Cormack (2010) Dennis Skinner (2010) Tony Wright (2009) Vince Cable (2008) John Denham (2007) Richard Bacon MP (2006) Sir Menzies Campbell (2005) Gwyneth Dunwoody (2005) Baroness Scotland of Asthal QC (2004) Robin Cook (2003) Tony Benn (2000) Political Turkey of the Year Veritas (2005) The Law Lords (2004) Folyrood - the Scottish Parliament building
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the House of Commons House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M4
    Factsheet M4 House of Commons Information Office Members Series Women in the House Revised June 2010 of Commons Contents This factsheet provides details of women Women sitting in the House of Commons .....................................................2 MPs currently sitting in the House of Women’s right to vote ..........................2 Commons and of women in Government Women as Members of Parliament ....3 posts. It also gives a history of the Election of the first women Members 4 Women Ministers ......................................5 campaigns to give women the vote and to Women Legislators ...................................5 allow them to stand as candidates for Woman Prime Minister ............................5 Woman Speaker .........................................5 election. The history of parliamentary Committees .................................................7 representation by women is also examined. Recent Developments in Women’s Representation ...........................................7 Appendix A ..................................................9 This factsheet is available on the internet at: Further reading ........................................ 10 http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets Useful websites ........................................ 11 Contact information .............................. 11 Feedback .................................................... 12 June 2010 FS No.M4 Ed 3.9 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2010 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament Is Proving More Assertive in Blair's Second Term
    M O N I T O R Issue 18 The Constitution Unit Bulletin March 2002 Parliament Awakening? Parliament is proving more asser- ing forward plans for major be widened beyond the Govern- tive in Blair’s second term. changes in working practices. So There was the early rebellion last are the Conservatives, in separate Contents summer over the Whips’ attempt proposals for reform of the Com- Devolution 2 to de-select Gwyneth Dunwoody mons and the Lords, published in Wales 2 and Donald Anderson as Select January. The biggest challenge lies Nothern Ireland 2 Scotland 3 Committee chairs. And the New in the long awaited proposals to English Regions 3 Year has seen comprehensive strengthen Select Committees, The Centre 4 rejection of the Government’s published by the Modernisation Parliamentary Reform 4 proposals for reform of the Lords, Committee on 12 February. These Elections and Parties 6 which would create a weak sec- include a statement of 11 core Local Government 8 ond chamber, still dominated by tasks for Select Committees, and a Europe 8 party patronage (see page 5). This recommendation that each Com- Human Rights 9 was the general view not just in mittee produce an annual report Freedom of Information 9 the Lords, but also in the Com- showing how it has met each core People on the Move 9 mons. The Commons no longer task. Constitution Unit News 10 seem to feel threatened by a These proposals present a real stronger and more assertive upper challenge for Parliament. The first Project Reports 10 house. Rather it is the Government Confidence in Government 10 test will be before the Liaison Lords White Paper Commentary 10 which seems to find the prospect Committee of Select Committee Women’s Political Participation 11 unnerving.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Committee
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE Wednesday 20 July 2005 Members present: Mr David Clelland Mr John Leech Mr Jeffrey M. Donaldson Mr Eric Martlew Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody Mr Lee Scott Clive Efford Mr Graham Stringer Mr Robert Goodwill Mr David Wilshire Members disclosed their pecuniary interests pursuant to the resolution of the House of 13 July 1992. Details of the declarations are published in a separate Annex. Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody was called to the Chair. Ordered, That members of the public be admitted during the examination of witnesses unless the Committee otherwise orders. Draft Special Report [Government Response to Sixth Report of the Committee, Session 2004-05: The Performance of London Underground], proposed by the Chairman, brought up, read the first and second time, and agreed to. Resolved, That the Report be the First Special Report of the Committee to the House. Ordered, That the Chairman do make the Special Report to the House. Ordered, That the Government’s response to the Sixth Report from the Committee, Session 2004-05, be appended to the Report.—(The Chairman.) Another draft Special Report [Government Response to Fourth Report of the Committee, Session 2004-05: The Departmental Annual Report 2004], proposed by the Chairman, brought up, read the first and second time, and agreed to. Resolved, That the Report be the Second Special Report of the Committee to the House. Ordered, That the Chairman do make the Special Report to the House. Ordered, That the Government’s response to the Fourth Report from the Committee, Session 2004-05, be appended to the Report.—(The Chairman.) The Committee’s programme of work (choice of inquiries).
    [Show full text]