DOCSLIB.ORG

Hansard New Politics Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hansard New Politics Book New Politics, New Parliament? A review of parliamentary modernisation since 1997 Alex Brazier, Matthew Flinders and Declan McHugh Hansard Society 2005 New Politics, New Parliament? A review of parliamentary modernisation since 1997 Text and graphics © Hansard Society 2005 Published by the Hansard Society, LSE, 9 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6XF Tel: 0207 395 4000, Fax: 0207 395 4008, [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the Hansard Society. The Hansard Society is an independent, non-partisan educational charity, which exists to promote effective parliamentary democracy. The Hansard Society’s Parliament and Government Programme works on all issues relating to the reform of Parliament, engagement between Parliament and the public and promoting effective parliamentary government through a range of conferences, publications, public and private meetings. We set the agenda on parliamentary reform through our work with parliamentarians and others to improve the operation of parliamentary government and encourage greater accessibility and closer engagement with the public. For information about other Hansard Society publications visit our website at www.hansardsociety.org.uk The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. The Hansard Society, as an independent non-party organisation, is neither for nor against. The Society is, however, happy to publish these views and to invite analysis and discussion of them. ISBN 0 900432 62 4 Cover design and photography by Ross Ferguson Printed and bound in Great Britain by Banjo Design & Print Limited Authors Alex Brazier is Senior Research Fellow on the Parliament and Government Programme, Hansard Society. Matthew Flinders is Senior Lecturer in Politics and Sub-Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Sheffield. Declan McHugh is Director of the Parliament and Government Programme, Hansard Society. Table of Contents Preface 1 Acknowledgements 2 Executive Summary 3 1 : Introduction 5 2 : Parliamentary modernisation since 1997: an overview 8 3 : Assessing parliamentary modernisation since 1997 14 (i) The legislative process (ii) Parliamentary scrutiny of the executive (iii) Modernising the style, form and working arrangements of Parliament 4 : Conclusions and recommendations 78 Appendices 89 Bibliography 103 List of Appendices Appendix 1 : List of Interviews Appendix 2 : Modernisation Committee Reports 1997-2005 Appendix 3 : Leaders of the House 1997-2005 Appendix 4 : Core Tasks of Select Committees, adopted by the Commons in May 2002 Appendix 5 : Government Refusal to Release Documents to Select Committees 2001-2005 Appendix 6 : Analysis of Applications for Information Under the Code of Practice on Access to Official Information 1998-2002 Appendix 7 : Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) and Ministerial Blocking Appendix 8 : Government Defeats in the House of Lords 1992-2004 Appendix 9 : Key Reports and Government Replies Appendix 10 : Major Changes to House Sitting Arrangements since 1998 Appendix 11 : Use of Sub-Committees and Turnover of Membership in Six Selected Cases Appendix 12 : Parliamentary Scrutiny Reforms 2001-2005 1 Preface The Hansard Society has a long interest in the operation of parliamentary democracy and has produced, over more than sixty years, a number of publications examining parliamentary government in the UK and around the world. The Society has also, through its Commissions, examined various aspects of the UK political process with a view to recommending reforms. Three of the most recent Commissions focused specifically on the Westminster Parliament. In 1992, the Rippon Commission examined the legislative process in its entirety – its report, Making the Law, becoming one of the most authoritative and influential texts on the law making process (updated in Brazier A. (ed), Parliament, Politics and Law Making 2004). In 2001, the Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, chaired by Lord Newton of Braintree, looked at Parliament’s non-legislative functions and suggested ways to make government more accountable. It, too, was an influential report and is credited with having had an important bearing on recent parliamentary reforms. Most recently, in 2005, the report of the Puttnam Commission – Members Only? Parliament in the Public Eye -– has suggested ways that Parliament might increase its ability to communicate its work to the world outside. While smaller in scale than these three Commissions, New Politics, New Parliament? covers similar ground by identifying and assessing changes to parliamentary procedure and practice since 1997 with a view to suggesting pragmatic options for reform. It is now eight years since Labour entered office with a commitment to ‘modernise’ the Westminster Parliament. As a new Parliament begins its work, following the election of a third successive Labour Government, the Hansard Society believes that this is an appropriate moment to take stock of the nature, extent and overall impact of the ‘modernisation’ process in order to plot the next steps that should be taken. 2 Acknowledgements The authors of this report would like to thank a number of people who kindly agreed to be interviewed as part of this inquiry: Anne Campbell MP, Rt Hon Robin Cook MP, Rt Hon Gwyneth Dunwoody MP, Mark Fisher MP, Rt Hon Eric Forth MP, Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, Prof. Robert Hazell, Oliver Heald MP, Baroness Jay, Lord Norton of Louth, Peter Riddell, Joan Ruddock MP, Dr Meg Russell, Lord Sheldon, Sir Nicholas Winterton MP, Tony Wright MP, Sir George Young MP. Appendix 1 provides details of when these interviews were conducted; where quotations in the text of the report are not specifically referenced, this denotes that they derive from the interviews. We would also like to thank a number of civil servants and Commons clerks for their insights, as well as Oonagh Gay and Richard Kelly in the House of Commons Library, who provided us with valuable information, research and advice. In addition, we are thankful to colleagues at the Hansard Society and University of Sheffield for their help and involvement, and give particular mention to Ragnhild Handagard and Vidya Ram who helped produce the final manuscript. Finally, the authors are very grateful to the Nuffield Foundation for funding this project. 3 Executive Summary • Parliament matters. The view of Parliament as being irrelevant, powerless or tangential to modern politics and government is a wholly misleading caricature. However, rapid change within government, society and to Britain’s broader constitutional architecture has to some degree left Parliament behind. • In 1997 Labour came to power committed to modernising Parliament in order to make the institution more effective, shift the balance of power between Parliament and the executive, and improve the public perception of Parliament. Although a number of significant reforms have been implemented, particularly during the 2001-2005 Parliament, there has not been a fundamental shift in the balance of power between Parliament and the executive. • In general, modernisation-as-efficiency has had more success than modernisation-as-scrutiny. That bias largely resulted from the failure of the Select Committee on the Modernisation of the House of Commons to set out a coherent end-point for modernisation. • With no clear objectives defined, the role of the Leader of the House as Chair of the Modernisation Committee became the dominant factor that influenced the course of the Committee’s work. • Between 1997 and 2001, although there were a number of important changes to the legislative process, the Modernisation Committee was steered away from addressing issues concerning the accountability of the executive. However, a confluence of factors occurred in the summer of 2001 that opened a ‘window of opportunity’ in relation to parliamentary reform, which the then Leader of the House was able to exploit. 4 • Key developments included the introduction of additional payments to select committee chairs, reforms to select committees and parliamentary questions and the bi-annual appearance of the Prime Minister before the Liaison Committee. The impact of these reforms is not yet fully known or apparent although the long-term effect of the reforms may be to strengthen Parliament in ways that the Government did not intend or anticipate when they were passed. • This audit of parliamentary modernisation reveals a number of ‘cracks and wedges’ in terms of important first-step reforms that may now be built upon and extended during future Parliaments. It is in this vein that this report sets out a pragmatic and realistic reform agenda that builds upon recent reforms and proposals that are currently under review. • The modernisation process has delivered some tangible results, including significant changes to Parliament’s legislative process and its scrutiny functions as well as improvements to the way that Westminster is organised. However, further reform is required and this report makes a number of recommendations for change. • Parliament’s authority rests on public confidence. If it is to restore this confidence it must take advantage of the current momentum for reform and build on recent reforms, not just to shift the balance of power between Parliament and the executive, but to close the growing gulf between Parliament and the public. 1 Introduction It is now eight years since Labour won a landslide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 19 June 2015 By Cheryl Pilbeam The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. Prison surveillance 5. Damian Green 6. The NSA files and metadata 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 19 June 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. Prison surveillance 9 4.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 9 4.2 Recording of prisoner’s telephone calls – 2006-2012 10 5. Damian Green 12 6. The NSA files and metadata 13 6.1 Prism 13 6.2 Tempora and metadata 14 Legal challenges 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who established the rule in 1966. According to the Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped. More recently, successive Interception of Communications Commissioners have recommended that the forty year convention which has banned the interception of MPs’ communications should be lifted, on the grounds that legislation governing interception has been introduced since 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilson Doctrine Samantha Godec
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 12 June 2017 By Pat Strickland Joanna Dawson The Wilson Doctrine Samantha Godec Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. The NSA files and metadata 5. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgment 6. Prison surveillance 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 8. Investigatory Powers Act 2016 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 12 June 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. The NSA files and metadata 9 4.1 Prism 9 4.2 Tempora and metadata 10 5. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal judgment 11 Emergency debate 12 6. Prison surveillance 13 6.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 13 6.2 Recording of prisoners’ telephone calls – 2006-2012 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 8. Investigatory Powers Act 2016 16 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who announced the policy in 1966. According to The Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • PSA Awards 2005
    POLITICAL STUDIES ASSOCIATION AWARDS 2005 29 NOVEMBER 2005 Institute of Directors, 116 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5ED Political Studies Association Awards 2005 Sponsors The Political Studies Association wishes to thank the sponsors of the 2005 Awards: Awards Judges Event Organisers Published in 2005 by Edited by Professor John Benyon Political Studies Association: Political Studies Association Professor Jonathan Tonge Professor Neil Collins Jack Arthurs Department of Politics Dr Catherine McGlynn Dr Catherine Fieschi Professor John Benyon University of Newcastle Professor John Benyon Professor Charlie Jeffery Dr Justin Fisher Newcastle upon Tyne Jack Arthurs Professor Wyn Grant Professor Ivor Gaber NE1 7RU Professor Joni Lovenduski Professor Jonathan Tonge Designed by Professor Lord Parekh Tel: 0191 222 8021 www.infinitedesign.com Professor William Paterson Neil Stewart Associates: Fax: 0191 222 3499 Peter Riddell Eileen Ashbrook e-mail: [email protected] Printed by Neil Stewart Yvonne Le Roux Potts Printers Liz Parkin www.psa.ac.uk Miriam Sigler Marjorie Thompson Copyright © Political Studies Association. All rights reserved Registered Charity no. 1071825 Company limited by guarantee in England and Wales no. 3628986 A W ARDS • 2004 Welcome I am delighted to welcome you to the Political Studies Association 2005 Awards. This event offers a rare opportunity to celebrate the work of academics, politicians and journalists. The health of our democracy requires that persons of high calibre enter public life. Today we celebrate the contributions made by several elected parliamentarians of distinction. Equally, governments rely upon objective and analytical research offered by academics. Today’s event recognizes the substantial contributions made by several intellectuals who have devoted their careers to the conduct of independent and impartial study.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Who Needs It?
    The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Who Needs It? British Journal of Politics and International Relation (2007), vol.9, no.1, pp.138-157. Alexandra Kelso Department of Politics and International Relations, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. [email protected] Abstract Modernisation has been rhetorically important for the Labour government since 1997, and it found a dedicated outlet through the House of Commons Modernisation Committee. This committee has pursued a particular type of modernisation, which this article seeks to explore. It does this by focusing on three issues. First, it examines the role of the Leader of the House of Commons in the chair of the Modernisation Committee. Second, it looks at the work of the Modernisation Committee in comparison to that of the Procedure Committee. Finally, it contextualises the discussion of modernisation with reference to the distinction between efficiency reforms and effectiveness reforms, and explores what this reveals about the complexity of executive–legislative relations at Westminster, and about the course of the modernisation debate since 1997. Introduction New Labour came to power in 1997 committed to a modernising agenda informed by its adherence to the so-called Third Way, and its promise of renewing social democracy (Giddens 1998 and 2000; Clift 2001). The discourse of the Third Way signified a ‘reconfiguration of relationships between economy and state, public and private, government and people’, in which ‘modernisation was a label attached to a wide-range of institutional reforms, including those of government, party and the political process itself’ (Newman 2001, 40).
    [Show full text]
  • Youth and Local Community Engagement in Devon in the 1960S: Voluntary Sector Or State Control After the Albemarle Report?
    Youth and Local Community Engagement in Devon in the 1960s: Voluntary Sector or State Control after the Albemarle Report? Submitted by Lyndy Pooley to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History In December 2019 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank Mark Jackson who has given me encouragement and supportive criticism over the years, and helped me to believe in myself. His humour and kindness cannot be underestimated. Secondly, I would like to thank Matthias Reiss for his enduring support and encouraging words, and for occasionally challenging me when I needed it. I would also like to thank the interviewees for this research who made me laugh, inspired me and not only answered my questions, but provided me with insights, photographs, books, pamphlets and other primary sources which have added unique perspectives and information to this thesis. I would also like to thank the staff at the Devon and North Devon Records Offices for their kind help in sourcing the many elusive local authority records that I needed to find, and suggesting others I didn’t know existed. And thanks also go to my family and friends who gave me encouragement and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Political Institutions: the Case of Constitutional Reform in Britain
    ANALYSING POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS: THE CASE OF CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN BRITAIN BEN SEYD School of Politics University of Kent February 2010 This is a working paper and not to be quoted. Comments are very welcome: [email protected] Abstract Over the last ten years, Britain has undergone major reform of its political system, encompassing the territorial organisation of power, the method of electing representatives, the nature of the legislature, the role of the judiciary, the status and operation of political parties, the scrutiny and oversight of the executive and the allocation of policy competences between elected and unelected actors. For political analysts, two questions arise from these changes: what caused the reforms, and what are their effects? This paper focuses on the latter. A light industry of research has been devoted to the British reforms. However, much of this work is descriptive or only lightly analytical; little attention has been paid in theoretical terms to the way the new institutions will work and their implications for policy decisions. Yet there is a well-developed literature, based on abstract or rational choice models of politics, devoted to the role and effects of political institutions. The paper draws on this literature to provide an account of the likely effects of institutional reform in Britain. Words: 11,773 1 Over the past decade, the British state has undergone a profound restructuring. Political authority has been decentralised to new tiers of government, the judiciary has been granted more extensive powers to review government actions, new systems for electing public representatives have been introduced, the membership of the second chamber has been recast, access to official information has been liberalised, power over monetary policy has been delegated to an independent agency and the financing of political parties has been formalised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945
    The Speaker of the House of Commons: The Office and Its Holders since 1945 Matthew William Laban Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 1 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I, Matthew William Laban, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of this thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: Details of collaboration and publications: Laban, Matthew, Mr Speaker: The Office and the Individuals since 1945, (London, 2013). 2 ABSTRACT The post-war period has witnessed the Speakership of the House of Commons evolving from an important internal parliamentary office into one of the most recognised public roles in British political life. This historic office has not, however, been examined in any detail since Philip Laundy’s seminal work entitled The Office of Speaker published in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Cut Off in the Original 232 6
    IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk TEXT CUT OFF IN THE ORIGINAL 232 6 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE Between 1983 and 1989 there were a series of important changes to Party organisation. Some of these were deliberately pursued, some were more unexpected. All were critical causes, effects and aspects of the transformation. Changes occurred in PLP whipping, Party finance, membership administration, disciplinary procedures, candidate selection, the policy-making process and, most famously, campaign organisation. This chapter makes a number of assertions about this process of organisational change which are original and are inspired by and enhance the search for complexity. It is argued that the organisational aspect of the transformation of the 1980s resulted from multiple causes and the inter-retroaction of those causes rather than from one over-riding cause. In particular, the existing literature has identified organisational reform as originating with a conscious pursuit by the core leadership of greater control over the Party (Heffernan ~\ . !.. ~ and Marqusee 1992: passim~ Shaw 1994: 108). This chapter asserts that while such conscious .... ~.. ,', .. :~. pursuit was one cause, other factors such as ad hoc responses to events .. ,t~~" ~owth of a presidential approach, the use of powers already in existence and the decline of oppositional forces acted as other causes. This emphasis upon multiple causes of change is clearly in keeping with the search for complexity. 233 This chapter also represents the first detailed outline and analysis of centralisation as it related not just to organisational matters but also to the issue of policy-making. In the same vein the chapter is particularly significant because it relates the centralisation of policy-making to policy reform as it occurred between 1983 and 1987 not just in relation to the Policy Review as is the approach of previous analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Members 1979-2010
    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the House of Commons
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06651, 21 August 2018 Women in the House of By Richard Kelly Commons Contents: 1. Women sitting in the House of Commons 2. Long Service 3. Women’s right to vote and to stand for election 4. Women as Members of Parliament 5. Equalisation of voting age 6. Office holders: firsts 7. Recent Developments in Women’s Representation 8. Further reading www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Women in the House of Commons Contents Summary 3 1. Women sitting in the House of Commons 4 Table 1: Number of female MPs by party in the 2017 Parliament and in the 2015 Parliament 4 Table 2: Women Members elected at General Elections: 1918-2017 5 2. Long Service 6 3. Women’s right to vote and to stand for election 7 4. Women as Members of Parliament 8 4.1 Eligibility to stand 8 4.2 Election of the first women Members 8 4.3 Women Legislators 9 5. Equalisation of voting age 10 6. Office holders: firsts 11 6.1 Women Ministers 11 6.2 Women Prime Ministers 11 6.3 Woman Speaker 11 6.4 Committees 12 7. Recent Developments in Women’s Representation 13 7.1 Legislation 13 8. Further reading 14 8.1 Library briefings 14 8.2 Other parliamentary publications 14 Cover page image copyright: UK Parliament 3 Commons Library Briefing, 21 August 2018 Summary At the General Election of June 2017, 208 women were elected as Members of Parliament. Of the 87 new members elected to Parliament for the first time in 2017, 33 were women.
    [Show full text]