DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2012/2078(INI) 13.9.2013 AMENDMENTS 1 - 259 Draft report Roberto Gualtieri, Rafał Trzaskowski (PE502.266v01-00) on constitutional problems of a multi-tier gouvernance in the European Union (2012/2078(INI)) AM\1001998EN.doc PE516.937v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE516.937v01-00 2/115 AM\1001998EN.doc EN Amendment 1 Jean-Pierre Audy Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG), Or. fr Amendment 2 Rainer Wieland Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty on improving inter- parliamentary cooperation (Article 12 TEU, Subsidiarity Protocol, Protocol on the role of national Parliaments), Or. de Amendment 3 Rafał Trzaskowski Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas differentiation is a constitutive A. whereas differentiation is a constitutive feature of the process of European feature of the process of European integration and a means to allow its integration and a means to facilitate its progress and guarantee substantial respect progress and guarantee substantial respect for the principle of equality, understood as for the principle of equality; AM\1001998EN.doc 3/115 PE516.937v01-00 EN the equal treatment of equal situations and the unequal treatment of unequal situations; Or. en Amendment 4 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Ba. whereas differentiated integration takes two forms: 'multi-speed', in which states seek to achieve the same goals according to different timeframes, and 'multi-tier', in which states agree to differ in their goals; Or. en Amendment 5 Rafał Trzaskowski Motion for a resolution Recital C Motion for a resolution Amendment C. whereas differentiation must not C. whereas differentiation must not undermine Union citizenship, which is the undermine Union citizenship, which is the fundamental status of Member States' fundamental status of Member States' nationals, enabling those who find nationals, enabling those who find themselves in the same situation to enjoy, themselves in the same situation to enjoy, within the scope of the Treaty, the same within the scope of the Treaty, the same treatment in law irrespective of their treatment in law, irrespective of their nationality; nationality; (comma) Or. en PE516.937v01-00 4/115 AM\1001998EN.doc EN Amendment 6 Roberto Gualtieri Motion for a resolution Recital D Motion for a resolution Amendment D. whereas any differentiation has to D. whereas any differentiation will respect respect the unity of the European legal and so reinforce the unity of the European order and its effectiveness and coherence, legal order and its effectiveness and the principle of non-discrimination on coherence, the principle of non- grounds of nationality, and the functioning discrimination on grounds of nationality as of the internal market; well as the establishing of the area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers and the functioning of the internal market; Or. en Amendment 7 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital E Motion for a resolution Amendment E. whereas differentiation may be resorted E. whereas differentiation may be resorted to where common action is not possible or to where common action at any given time reachable; is not possible or reachable; Or. en Amendment 8 Rafał Trzaskowski Motion for a resolution Recital E AM\1001998EN.doc 5/115 PE516.937v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment E. whereas differentiation may be resorted E. whereas differentiation may be resorted to where common action is not possible or to where common action is not possible or reachable; feasible; Or. en Amendment 9 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital F Motion for a resolution Amendment F. whereas differentiation is embedded in F. whereas differentiation is compatible the single institutional framework of the with the single institutional framework of European Union; the European Union Or. en Amendment 10 Rafał Trzaskowski Motion for a resolution Recital F Motion for a resolution Amendment F. whereas differentiation is embedded in F. whereas differentiation is and should the single institutional framework of the always be embedded in the single European Union; institutional framework of the European Union; Or. en Amendment 11 György Schöpflin, József Szájer PE516.937v01-00 6/115 AM\1001998EN.doc EN Motion for a resolution Recital G Motion for a resolution Amendment G. whereas the Treaties offer different G. whereas the Treaties offer different options and instruments for differentiated options and instruments for differentiated integration, including limitations of the integration, including limitations of the territorial scope of application, safeguard territorial scope of application, safeguard clauses, derogations, opt-outs, opt-ins, clauses, derogations, opt-outs, opt-ins, enhanced cooperation, and provisions enhanced cooperation, and provisions specific to Member States whose currency specific to the Member States, provided is the euro, provided such instruments such instruments respect the unity, respect the unity, effectiveness and effectiveness and coherence of the coherence of the European legal order and European legal order and are embedded in are embedded in the single institutional the single institutional framework (the framework (the Community method); Community method); Or. hu Amendment 12 Roberto Gualtieri Motion for a resolution Recital G Motion for a resolution Amendment G. whereas the Treaties offer different G. whereas the Treaties offer several options and instruments for differentiated options and instruments for differentiated integration, including limitations of the integration, including limitations of the territorial scope of application, safeguard territorial scope of application, safeguard clauses, derogations, opt-outs, opt-ins, clauses, derogations, opt-outs, opt-ins, enhanced cooperation, and provisions enhanced cooperation, and provisions specific to Member States whose currency specific to Member States whose currency is the euro, provided such instruments is the euro, provided such instruments respect the unity, effectiveness and respect the unity, effectiveness and coherence of the European legal order and coherence of the European legal order and are embedded in the single institutional are embedded in the single institutional framework (the Community method); framework (the Community method); Or. en AM\1001998EN.doc 7/115 PE516.937v01-00 EN Amendment 13 Gerald Häfner on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Ga. Whereas the systematic use of derogations and opt-outs by some Member States may jeopardise the unity, effectiveness and coherence of the European legal order; Or. en Amendment 14 Roberto Gualtieri Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Ga. whereas some Member states have obtained to opt-out of different EU policies, as laid down in different Protocols to the Treaties; Or. en Amendment 15 Roberto Gualtieri Motion for a resolution Recital H Motion for a resolution Amendment H. whereas derogations under Article 27(2) H. whereas derogations under Article 27(2) TFEU allow a differentiation between TFEU allow a differentiation between certain Member States within a legal act certain Member States within a legal act that is addressed to all Member States; that is addressed to all Member States; still PE516.937v01-00 8/115 AM\1001998EN.doc EN with the aim of progressively establishing and ensuring the functionality of the internal market; Or. en Amendment 16 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital K Motion for a resolution Amendment K. whereas the enhanced cooperation K. whereas the enhanced cooperation procedure allows for the adoption of procedure allows, as a last resort, for the measures binding a subgroup of Member adoption of measures binding a subgroup States after an authorisation granted by the of Member States after an authorisation Council by a qualified majority and within granted by the Council by a qualified the field of the CFSP after an authorisation majority and within the field of the CFSP granted by unanimity; after an authorisation granted by unanimity; Or. en Amendment 17 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Ka. whereas in the field of common foreign and security policy, clusters of states are enabled to tackle specific tasks or missions, and in the field of common security and defence policy, the establishment of a permanent core group of militarily capable states is envisaged; Or. en AM\1001998EN.doc 9/115 PE516.937v01-00 EN Amendment 18 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Na. whereas the UK has obtained numerous possibilities, under certain complicated conditions, to opt out of EU policies in the field of justice and home affairs; Or. en Amendment 19 Roberto Gualtieri Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Oa. whereas the Prüm Convention has been partially integrated into the EU legal framework; Or. en Amendment 20 Andrew Duff Motion for a resolution Recital R Motion for a resolution Amendment R. whereas the TSCG treaty is a treaty R. whereas the TSCG treaty is a treaty under international law concluded by the under international law concluded by the Member States except for the United Member States except for the United Kingdom and the Czech Republic, and Kingdom and the Czech Republic, and whereas it calls in its Article 16 for the whereas it foresees in its Article 16 for the incorporation of its relevant provisions into incorporation of its relevant provisions into PE516.937v01-00 10/115 AM\1001998EN.doc EN EU law; EU law; Or. en Amendment 21 Jean-Pierre Audy Motion for a resolution Recital R Motion for a resolution Amendment R. whereas the TSCG treaty is a treaty R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs 2020/2075(INI) 23.4.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 466 Draft report Margarida Marques (PE689.500v01-00) The review of the macroeconomic legislative framework for a better impact on Europe’s real economy and improved transparency of decision-making and democratic accountability (2020/2075(INI)) AM\1229373EN.docx PE691.374v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE691.374v01-00 2/224 AM\1229373EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Markus Ferber, Ralf Seekatz, Jessica Polfjärd, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Esther de Lange, Danuta Maria Hübner, Luděk Niedermayer Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Treaty on — having regard to Article 2 of the European Union, signed in Maastricht on Treaty on European Union, 7 February 1992, establishing in Article 2 that ‘The Community shall have as its task, by establishing a common market and an economic and monetary union and by implementing the common policies or activities referred to in Articles 3 and 3a, to promote throughout the Community a harmonious and balanced development of economic activities, sustainable and non-inflationary growth respecting the environment, a high degree of convergence of economic performance, a high level of employment and of social protection, the raising of the standard of living and quality of life, and economic and social cohesion and solidarity among Member States’, Or. en Amendment 2 Luděk Niedermayer Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Stärken Heißt Deutschland Stärken! Deutschland Heißt Stärken Europa
    Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken! Deutschland heißt stärken Europa 1 2 Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken Die europäische Politik steht heute mehr denn je im Zentrum des öffentlichen Interesses in Deutschland. Die großen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit – die kriegeri- schen Konflikte in unseren Nachbarregionen, die Migra- tionsbewegungen und der Kampf gegen Islamismus und Terrorismus – lassen sich nicht mehr national lösen. Nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern können wir tragfähige Lösungen erarbeiten und die Errungenschaften der europäischen Einigung – Frieden, Freiheit, Sicherheit und wirtschaftlicher Wohlstand – erhalten. Das Auftreten populistischer, europafeindlicher Parteien und der von Großbritannien angestrebte Austritt aus der EU dürfen nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass die überwältigende Mehrheit der Deutschen wie der Euro- päer von der Notwendigkeit der europäischen Einigung überzeugt ist. Dieses Vertrauen gilt es durch sachge- rechte politische Lösungen auf allen Ebenen zu stärken. Wir arbeiten daher nachhaltig für sichere EU-Außen- grenzen, eine dauerhafte Reduktion der Migrations- ströme nach Europa, eine stabile europäische Währung, solide Staatshaushalte, einen funktionierenden Binnen- markt, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitsplätze, innere und äußere Sicherheit sowie die Bewahrung der Schöp- fung. All dies können wir nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern erreichen und dauerhaft sichern, im Interesse Deutschlands und Europas! Diese Broschüre bietet Ihnen einen Überblick über die Arbeit und
    [Show full text]
  • ECON-PV-2021-06-03-1 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ECON_PV(2021)0603_1 MINUTES Meeting of 3 June 2021 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 9:02 with Irene Tinagli, Chairwoman presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda Decision: The draft agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Approval of minutes of meetings 10 May 2021 PV – PE692.834v01-00 Decision: The minutes were approved. 3. Chair’s announcements None 4. Report on ongoing interinstitutional negotiations Amending Directive 2013/34/EU on disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches - Trilogue of 1 June On 1 June, in the third trilogue, a provisional political agreement was reached on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches: the proposal on public country-by-country reporting. PV\1234045EN.docx PE693.862v01-00 EN United in diversityEN I would like to congratulate the co-rapporteurs, Evelyn Regner for ECON and Iban Garcia del Blanco for JURI, and the negotiating team for this achievement. I would also like to thank the Portuguese Presidency for their efforts in bringing back this important file to the negotiation table after five years dormant in Council, and thank the Commission for their role as loyal broker between the Parliament and the Council. On the content, I will briefly sum up the main features of the agreement: - Regarding the content of the report on income tax information, co-legislators agreed in including, together with other items, the number of employees on a full-time equivalent basis and the list of all subsidiary undertakings established in the Union or in tax jurisdictions included in Annex I and Annex II of the Council conclusions on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Discontent: the Rise to Power of Anti-TTIP Groups
    ECIPE OCCASIONAL PAPER • 02/2016 Manufacturing Discontent: The Rise to Power of Anti-TTIP Groups By Matthias Bauer, Senior Economist* *Special thanks to Karen Rudolph (Otto-Friedrich-University Bamberg) and Agnieszka Smiatacz (Research Assistant at ECIPE) for research support all along the process of the preparation of this study. ecipe occasional paper — no. 02/2016 ABSTRACT Old beliefs, new symbols, new faces. In 2013, a small group of German green and left- wing activists, professional campaign NGOs and well-established protectionist organisations set up deceptive communication campaigns against TTIP, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the European Union and the United States. Germany’s anti-TTIP NGOs explicitly aimed to take German-centred protests to other European countries. Their reasoning is contradictory and logically inconsistent. Their messages are targeted to serve common sense protectionist demands of generally ill-informed citizens and politicians. Thereby, anti-TTIP communication is based on metaphoric messages and far-fetched myths to effectively evoke citizens’ emotions. Together, these groups dominated over 90 percent of online media reporting on TTIP in Germany. Anti-TTIP protest groups in Germany are not only inventive; they are also resourceful. Based on generous public funding and opaque private donations, green and left-wing political parties, political foundations, clerical and environmental groups, and well-established anti-globalisation organisations maintain influential campaign networks. Protest groups’ activities are coordinated by a number of former and current green and left-wing politicians and political parties that search for anti-establishment political profiles. As Wallon blockage mentality regarding CETA, the trade and investment agreement between the European Union and Canada, demonstrates, Germany’s anti-TTIP groups’ attempts to undermine EU trade policy bear the risk of coming to fruition in other Eurpean countries.
    [Show full text]
  • People-Centered Economy – the Coordinators
    People-Centered Economy – The Coordinators David Sassoli European Parliament ”We have a unique social market economy. It is the source of our prosperity and social fairness. 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 S&D This is all the more important when we face a twin transition: climate and digital. Valdis Dombrovskis will lead our work to bring together the social and the market in our economy.” — Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP Renew EPP S&D Renew ID Europe Europe S&D Luděk Niedermayer Stéphanie Yon-Courtin Markus Ferber Jonás Fernández Luis Garicano Gunnar Beck ECON Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Irene Tinagli ECR ECR Chair GUE/NGL Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Derk Jan Eppink José Gusmão Sven Giegold Derk Jan Eppink José Gusmão Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator EPP EPP EPP S&D Renew ID Europe S&D Iuliu Winkler Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou Christophe Hansen Kathleen Van Brempt Karin Karlsbro Markus Buchheit INTA Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Committee on International Bernd Lange Trade Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL Chair Europe Marie-Pierre Vedrenne Jan Zahradil Heidi Hautala Geert Bourgeois Helmut Scholz Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ECR Tomáš Zdechovský Vilija Blinkevičiūtė Dennis Radtke Agnes Jongerius Dragoș Pîslaru France Jamet EMPL Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Lucia Ďuriš GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL Nicholsonová Chair Sandra Pereira Kira Marie Peter-Hansen Elżbieta Rafalska Nikolaj Villumsen Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator This document only compiles publicly available information on the date of its release and not does pretend to be exhaustive (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Legal Affairs 2020/2129(INL) 9.10.2020 AMENDMENTS 201 - 400 Draft report Lara Wolters (PE657.191v01-00) Corporate due diligence and corporate accountability (2020/2129(INL)) AM\1215355EN.docx PE658.902v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE658.902v01-00 2/120 AM\1215355EN.docx EN Amendment 201 Manon Aubry Motion for a resolution Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 9 – point 6 Motion for a resolution Amendment 6. A more general approach was taken 6. A different, more general and by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive5 complementary approach was taken by the , which imposes on some large Non-Financial Reporting Directive5 , undertakings the obligation to report on the which imposes on some large undertakings policies they pursue in relation to the obligation to report on the policies they environmental, social and employee pursue in relation to environmental, social matters, respect for human rights, anti- and employee matters, respect for human corruption and bribery matters, including rights, anti-corruption and bribery matters, due diligence. However, the scope of that including due diligence. However, the directive is limited and the obligation is scope of that directive is limited and the based on a comply-or-explain principle. obligation is based on a comply-or-explain principle. _________________ _________________ 5 Directive 2014/95/EU of the European 5 Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non- 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non- financial and diversity information by financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups (OJ certain large undertakings and groups (OJ L 330, 15.11.2014, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, April 19, 2018 Dear President Juncker
    Brussels, April 19, 2018 Dear President Juncker, Dear Commissioner Timmermans, Dear Mr Magnier, Director of Creative Europe, We take note of the letter sent by PEN International and endorsed by 250 international authors1 expressing outrage at the behaviour of Jason Micallef, Chairman of Valletta 2018 Capital of Culture. We share the outrage expressed in this letter. The vilification of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, even after her assassination, and the calls for the clearing of the memorial in her tribute in Valletta and for banners demanding for justice to be removed are actions that we consider incompatible with those of an official that represents the European Capital of Culture. It has been noted that merely hours after this PEN letter was published, Jason Micallef proceeded to continue with his outbursts on social media and ordered banners organised by Maltese civil society calling for justice to be removed. We strongly condemn these undignified and unacceptable actions and call on the European Commission to demand Mr Micallef be immediately removed from the post of Chairman of Valletta 2018 Capital of Culture. Sincerely, David CASA (EPP) Stelios KOULOGLOU (GUE) Ana GOMES (S&D) Monica MACOVEI (ECR) Maite PAGAZAURTUNDÚA (ALDE) Benedek JÁVOR (Greens-EFA) Ádám KÓSA Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA Alojz PETERLE Bernd KÖLMEL Angelika MLINAR Bodil VALERO Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Bogdan Brunon WENTA 1 http://pen-international.org/news/6-month-anniversary-assassination-daphne-caruana-galizia Carolina PUNSET Javier COUSO
    [Show full text]