DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity Action Plan 2020 Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Waltham Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2020 Update Taking pride in our wildlife and green places Front cover image: Small Skipper butterfly www.walthamforest.gov.uk Waltham Forest Biodiversity Action Plan Contents 1 Introduction to the 2020 BAP update What is biodiversity? 2 Why should we conserve our wildlife and their habitats? 2 Our biodiversity vision for Waltham Forest 4 Managing biodiversity in Waltham Forest 6 Action for habitats 9 Action for species 17 Access to our green places 19 Education and partnership 19 Monitoring and reporting 20 Glossary – biodiversity words explained 21 How you can get involved 24 Wildlife sites in Waltham Forest 26 Habitat and Species Action Plans 28 2020 BAP Updates 2020 BAP update: review of objectives, actions and targets 2020 BAP update: achievements and successes in delivering the 2010-2020 BAP 2020 BAP update: legislation and policy review 2020 BAP update: Habitat and Species Action Plan additions to be included within a full BAP review Biodiversity Action Plan 2010-2020 Introduction to the 2020 BAP Update Since the production of Waltham Forest's Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) ten years ago, the council has achieved significant progress in conserving and enhancing the borough’s habitats and species. As it draws to the end of the BAP period (2010 – 2020) it is now timely to review progress against each of the prescribed objectives and to consider priorities for biodiversity in Waltham Forest over the next ten years. This report provides an update of the current BAP based on a review of the tasks completed to date, as well as an understanding of current policies and legislation. No borough wide biological records, data search or surveys have been undertaken to inform this review. Going forward there may be a need to undertake a comprehensive BAP review and update to cover the period up to 2030. The updates undertaken as part of this review comprise: • A review of progress on delivery of the action plan. • An overview of what actions may need to be taken forward into a full BAP update, and an outline of considerations for taking these forward. • Case studies that illustrate successes in delivering the 2010-2020 BAP and enhancements for biodiversity. • An updated review of policy and legislation to set out the rationale and provide context for the preparation of a full BAP review. • Additional Species Action Plans. Several objectives and actions within the 2010-2020 BAP are still relevant and still apply, as do the Habitat and Species Action Plans. These are retained although have been added to with two additional proposed Species Action Plans; Pollinators and Hedgehogs. In order to reflect the council's priorities and support the emerging Pollinator Action Plan, recommendations are made to amend several existing Habitat Action Plans to include provision for additional wildflowers and long grass areas across roadside verges, gardens & parks, allotments & community food growing sites. Several borough wide strategies are currently emerging and are at various stages of development. The current BAP, together with future updates, will need to be in alignment with these. Those of most relevance include: • Waltham Forest Open Space and Management Strategy 2020-2030. • Waltham Forest Green Infrastructure Strategy. • Waltham Forest Pollinator Action Plan (PAP). 3 What is biodiversity? Biodiversity is the name used to describe the variety of all living things (wildlife) and the places where they live (habitats). Why should we conserve our wildlife and their habitats? There are many reasons why biodiversity is important:- The next generation Over one hundred diversity within the is entitled to an species were lost in UK, and to contribute environment as rich the UK in the to the conservation of and varied as the twentieth century, global biodiversity current one. including seven through all appropriate percent of dragonflies, mechanisms‟. five percent of Species which have butterflies and more In response, Waltham evolved very slowly than two percent of all Forest Council began may be lost very fish and mammals. developing its own quickly and cannot BAP, publishing the be replaced. In addition, many of final document in our familiar birds have 2001. seen their populations reduced by over 50 The BAP outlined the Climate change is percent in the last 25 way in which the undermining years. Council would established habitats contribute to the and threatening more In January 1994, the delivery of the UK and more species United Kingdom Plan. with extinction. Government published Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan. Agriculture depends This was in response on a wide range of to the commitment genetic material from given by the Prime plants and animals to Minister at the Earth reinforce crop Summit in Rio de selection and Janeiro in 1992. increase productivity. Hawthorn in bloom The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) set Natural processes as an overall goal: help to protect to „To conserve and protect planet Earth. enhance biological 4 Biodiversity Action Plan 2010-2020 Our contribution biodiversity in all its Wildlife & Countryside focused on eleven Act 1981 as amended activities. important habitats, in 2000. and contained time As such, we have updated our BAP to targeted actions and align it with current commitments. EU Habitats Regulations 1994 guidelines and best practice. including the Birds Of these habitats Directive. seven were a priority For example we now for London as a have 12 Habitat and five whole, the remaining Species Action Plans, Countryside & Rights four being specific to of Way (CRoW) Act as well as an Open Waltham Forest. 2000. Spaces Strategy. Since 1992 there have We also consider the effects of climate been many changes Natural Environment & Rural Communities change in our Core in European and UK Strategy policies, and biodiversity legislation (NERC) Act 2006. ensure that our patterns and the Council has a of development and use number of statutory The NERC Act is of of resources support the biodiversity duties. particular importance, long term sustainability as it requires the of our environment in a The legal framework Council to consider practical and effective includes:- way. Redwing on Holly 3 Our biodiversity vision for Waltham Forest Vision Our vision for Waltham Forest is of a diverse natural landscape with the countryside and open spaces integrated into the urban environment. It is a place where the richness of the biodiversity in the Borough is protected, conserved and Street trees in Epping Way, Chingford enhanced for ours and future generations. monitoring methods to help measure its Most importantly it is a success. place where local people understand Our BAP is also and enjoy the natural closely linked to environment around London‟s biodiversity them, and where priorities, so we can wildlife and people effectively measure can thrive together. our contribution to the protection of wildlife Field Grasshopper In order to help and habitats in the achieve this, the City and the Greater Biodiversity Action London area. Plan addresses specific objectives for Our vision, and the the conservation of contents of this BAP, key habitats and have been defined species, the raising of and shaped through public awareness and extensive consultation Markhouse Road, Walthamstow the involvement of all with conservation sectors of the organisations, community. countryside staff, councillors, officers of The BAP sets specific the Council, friends targets for actions and and volunteer groups. includes indicators and Goat Willow catkins 4 Biodiversity Action Plan 2010-2020 Objectives We have identified six objectives for our Biodiversity Action Plan against which we will measure our achievements. To protect and enhance the wildlife and habitats in Waltham Forest, in particular those of international, national and regional importance. To ensure that developers, major landowners and organisations, including the Council, Common Spotted Orchid schools and colleges, the private sector and statutory undertakers, are aware of the importance of conserving biodiversity and are positively involved in the implementation of the BAP. Orange Peel Fungus To ensure the proper consideration of biodiversity conservation in the management of all open space and amenity land in Waltham Forest. To seek opportunities for increasing the area Field Vole and number of priority and locally important habitats. To develop the long term interest and involvement of people living and working in the Garden Tiger Moth Borough., including access to nature. To monitor and report on our progress against the targets within the BAP. Common Blue Butterfly 5 Managing biodiversity in Waltham Forest In addition, Epping With respect to Forest and the London, these sites Walthamstow are classified as being Reservoirs (which of Metropolitan, form part of the Lea Borough or Local Valley SPA) are both Importance, and Sites of Scientific descriptions can be Interest (SSSIs), found in „Wildlife Sites Land off Whipps Cross Road, Epping Forest along with in Waltham Forest‟, Walthamstow which is available on Marshes and the the Council‟s website. Waltham Forest Chingford Reservoirs. extends from the edge The majority of these of the Essex SSSIs are the UK‟s green places are countryside in the very best wildlife and managed directly by north, to the inner city geological sites, and the Council, some in East End bordering are protected by law partnership with local Hackney and from damage through conservation Newham in the south. development
Recommended publications
  • Report on Natural Features

    Report on Natural Features

    NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT REPORT ON NATURAL FEATURES The Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5 (2) (l) AD05.16 Arup Revision 0 October 2015 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Report on Natural Features Contents Page Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 2 1.2 Purpose of this report 2 1.3 Document structure 2 1.4 The Applicant 3 1.5 The Application Site 3 1.6 Surrounding area 5 1.7 The Project 6 1.8 Stages of development 10 2 Scope of natural features considered 17 3 Methodology for the assessment of effects 20 4 Assessment of effects 21 4.1 Statutory sites and features of nature conservation 21 4.2 Non-statutory sites and features of nature conservation 23 4.3 Sites of landscape importance 23 4.4 Habitats of protected species 24 4.5 Water bodies in a river basin management plan 26 5 Conclusion 29 Appendices Appendix A : Plan showing the natural features in the vicinity of the Application Site A.1 Glossary Refer to Project Glossary (AD01.05) AD05.16 | Issue | October 2015 | Arup North London Waste Authority North London Heat and Power Project Report on Natural Features Executive summary i.i.i A Report on Natural Features has been prepared to support North London Waste Authority’s (the Applicant’s) application (the Application) for a Development Consent Order (DCO) made pursuant to the Planning Act 2008 (as amended) for the North London Heat and Power Project (the Project).
  • Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31St March 2020

    Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31St March 2020

    Company no 1600379 Charity no 283895 LONDON WILDLIFE TRUST (A Company Limited by Guarantee) Report and Financial Statements For the year ended 31st March 2020 CONTENTS Pages Trustees’ Report 2-9 Reference and Administrative Details 10 Independent Auditor's Report 11-13 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 14 Consolidated and Charity Balance sheets 15 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 16 Notes to the accounts 17-32 1 London Wildlife Trust Trustees’ report For the year ended 31st March 2020 The Board of Trustees of London Wildlife Trust present their report together with the audited accounts for the year ended 31 March 2020. The Board have adopted the provisions of the Charities SORP (FRS 102) – Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended practice applicable to charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (effective 1 January 2015) in preparing the annual report and financial statements of the charity. The accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Our objectives London Wildlife Trust Limited is required by charity and company law to act within the objects of its Articles of Association, which are as follows: 1. To promote the conservation, creation, maintenance and study for the benefit of the public of places and objects of biological, geological, archaeological or other scientific interest or of natural beauty in Greater London and elsewhere and to promote biodiversity throughout Greater London. 2. To promote the education of the public and in particular young people in the principles and practice of conservation of flora and fauna, the principles of sustainability and the appreciation of natural beauty particularly in urban areas.
  • Enfield Characterisation Study

    Enfield Characterisation Study

    eld Characterisation Study | Final Report | February 2011 fi En 5.128 ENFIELD’S P P LACES 129 Enfi eld Characterisation Study | Final Report | February 2011 ENFIELD’S PLACES Enfi eld is not a single homogenous place. As a counterpoint to these radial development Rather, it is a collection of separate and distinct zones, there is also an overlying east-west places with their own origins. Although these corridor which can be applied to describe places may have coalesced over time, they still the infl uence of the North Circular Road on retain their own identity and character. This the areas to either side. As with the Western can be seen in the types of street pattern corridor, areas such as Bounds Green overlap and architecture, the structure of centres and the formal borough boundary, leading to a focal points and the names used to describe blurring of identity. the various locations. This is a distinctive Finally, to the north of the urban area lies the characteristic of the village origins of much green belt, a mixture of farmland, parkland, of London. In each case the history of the commercial areas and leisure uses. origins and growth of a place are crucial to the establishment of the later character, with This element of work has been informed by a elements such as the construction of rail and workshop with local stakeholders drawn from tube lines playing a major role in creating new across the borough. The plan laid out here suburbs which have a profound and lasting draws on the discussions about the various imprint on the area.
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of

    Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of

    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD

    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
  • Isla Hoffmann-Heap Report Habitats Regulations Assessment for The

    Isla Hoffmann-Heap Report Habitats Regulations Assessment for The

    Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan London Borough of Bromley Project Number: 60474250 November 14 2016 Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Isla Hoffmann-Heap Dr James Riley Max Wade Consultant Ecologist Associate Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 15/11/16 Draft JR James Riley Associate Prepared for: London Borough of Bromley AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan Prepared for: London Borough of Bromley Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann-Heap Consultant Ecologist T: 01256 310 486 M: 07920 789 719 E: [email protected] AECOM Limited Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2016 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: London Borough of Bromley AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment for the London Borough of Bromley's Proposed Submission Draft Local Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................
  • Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Area Appraisal October 2020

    Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Area Appraisal October 2020

    London Borough of Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal October 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Author(s): Maria Medlycott, Teresa O’Connor, Katie Lee-Smith Derivation: Origination Date: 15/10/2020 Reviser(s): Tim Murphy Date of last revision: 23/11/2020 Date Printed: 23/11/2020 Version: 2 Status: Final 2 Contents 1 Acknowledgments and Copyright ................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 3 Explanation of Archaeological Priority Areas .................................................................. 8 4 Archaeological Priority Area Tiers ................................................................................ 10 5 History of Waltham Forest Borough ............................................................................. 13 6 Archaeological Priority Areas in Waltham Forest.......................................................... 31 6.1 Tier 1 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.2 Tier 2 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.3 Tier 3 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 32 6.4 Waltham Forest APA 1.1. Queen Elizabeth Hunting Lodge GV II* .................... 37 6.5 Waltham Forest APA 1.2: Water House ...............................................................
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Strategic Planning Evidence and Policies

    Lee Valley Regional Park Strategic Planning Evidence and Policies

    Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies April 2019 Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies Prepared by LUC Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Executive Summary Extending north from East India Dock Basin for 26 miles, and broadly aligned with the natural course of the river Lea through east London and Essex to Ware in Hertfordshire, the Lee Valley Regional Park presents a rich tapestry of award winning international sports venues, attractive parklands and areas of significant ecological importance. The Park attracts over 7 million visits each year largely drawn from London, Hertfordshire and Essex but given the international status of its venues increasingly from across the United Kingdom and abroad. The Regional Park lies at the centre of one of Europe’s largest regeneration areas which includes London 2012 and its Legacy, major developments in the lower Lee Valley, Meridian Water and a range of large schemes coming forward in Epping Forest District and the Borough of Broxbourne. The Authority’s adopted policies date from 2000 and, given the Regional Park’s rapidly changing context, a new approach is required. The Strategic Aims and Policies, Landscape Strategy and Area Proposals included in the Park Development Framework are designed to respond to this changing context to ensure that the Regional Park can maintain its role as an exciting and dynamic destination which caters for leisure, recreation and the natural environment over the next 10-15 years.
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report – Draft Site Allocations

    Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report – Draft Site Allocations

    Report Submitted to Submitted by London Borough of Haringey AECOM Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report – Draft Site Allocations DPD AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report – Page i Draft Site Allocations DPD Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: James Riley Ecologist Associate Director Approved by: James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 Draft for Client Comments JR JR 02/11/15 1 Final for consultation JR JR 10/11/15 Scott House, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com 47076094 10/11/2015 London Borough of Haringey Council November/2015 AECOM Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Report – Page ii Draft Site Allocations DPD Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of The London Borough of Haringey Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
  • LBR 2007 Front Matter V5.1

    LBR 2007 Front Matter V5.1

    1 London Bird Report No.72 for the year 2007 Accounts of birds recorded within a 20-mile radius of St Paul's Cathedral A London Natural History Society Publication Published April 2011 2 LONDON BIRD REPORT NO. 72 FOR 2007 3 London Bird Report for 2007 produced by the LBR Editorial Board Contents Introduction and Acknowledgements – Pete Lambert 5 Rarities Committee, Recorders and LBR Editors 7 Recording Arrangements 8 Map of the Area and Gazetteer of Sites 9 Review of the Year 2007 – Pete Lambert 16 Contributors to the Systematic List 22 Birds of the London Area 2007 30 Swans to Shelduck – Des McKenzie Dabbling Ducks – David Callahan Diving Ducks – Roy Beddard Gamebirds – Richard Arnold and Rebecca Harmsworth Divers to Shag – Ian Woodward Herons – Gareth Richards Raptors – Andrew Moon Rails – Richard Arnold and Rebecca Harmsworth Waders – Roy Woodward and Tim Harris Skuas to Gulls – Andrew Gardener Terns to Cuckoo – Surender Sharma Owls to Woodpeckers – Mark Pearson Larks to Waxwing – Sean Huggins Wren to Thrushes – Martin Shepherd Warblers – Alan Lewis Crests to Treecreeper – Jonathan Lethbridge Penduline Tit to Sparrows – Jan Hewlett Finches – Angela Linnell Buntings – Bob Watts Appendix I & II: Escapes & Hybrids – Martin Grounds Appendix III: Non-proven and Non-submitted Records First and Last Dates of Regular Migrants, 2007 170 Ringing Report for 2007 – Roger Taylor 171 Breeding Bird Survey in London, 2007 – Ian Woodward 181 Cannon Hill Common Update – Ron Kettle 183 The establishment of breeding Common Buzzards – Peter Oliver 199
  • An Assessment of the Feasibility of Annual Monitoring of Winter Gull Roosts in the UK and Possible Outputs from Such a Scheme

    An Assessment of the Feasibility of Annual Monitoring of Winter Gull Roosts in the UK and Possible Outputs from Such a Scheme

    BTO Research Report No. 483 An assessment of the feasibility of annual monitoring of winter gull roosts in the UK and possible outputs from such a scheme Authors N.H.K. Burton, I.M.D. Maclean & G.E. Austin Report of work carried out by The British Trust for Ornithology under contract to Natural England November 2007 British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures .........................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................9 2. METHODS............................................................................................................................11 2.1 Identification of Sites Where Gull Numbers Surpass 1% Thresholds or Exceed 20,000 Birds ...........................................................................................................................11 2.2 Comparison of Species’ Indices Produced Using Wings and Webs Core Counts and Their Representativeness..............................................................................................12
  • State of the Natural Environment in London: Securing Our Future

    State of the Natural Environment in London: Securing Our Future

    State of the natural environment in London: securing our future www.naturalengland.org.uk Contents Foreword 1 1 London’s natural environment 2 2 Natural London, Wild London 4 3 Natural London, Active London 12 4 Natural London, Future London 19 Annexes 25 © M a t h e w M a s s i n i Water vole Foreword The natural environment faces a number of This report on the state of the natural unique challenges in London that demand a environment in London shows there is much long term and sustainable response. work to do. It highlights Natural England’s position on some of the most crucial issues Perhaps the greatest challenge we face is to concerning the natural environment in ensure the benefits of the natural environment London. It describes how we will work with a are recognised and raised up the agenda at a range of people and organisations to deliver time when the global economy is centre our vision for Natural London, helping to stage. The natural environment underpins our ensure London is a world leader in improving health, wellbeing and prosperity. the environment. © We need to find ways of conserving and E l l e enhancing our green spaces and natural n S o assets in light of the knowledge that London f t l e is set to continue to grow for the foreseeable y future. We must take opportunities to connect more Londoners with their natural environment to encourage awareness of the benefits it can bring to health and quality of life. We need to quickly focus on how we are Alison Barnes going to adapt to the 50 years, at least, of Regional Director climate change that is now unavoidable.