DOCSLIB.ORG

Properties of Actinide Metals Under High Pressure U

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Properties of Actinide Metals Under High Pressure U PROPERTIES OF ACTINIDE METALS UNDER HIGH PRESSURE U. Benedict To cite this version: U. Benedict. PROPERTIES OF ACTINIDE METALS UNDER HIGH PRESSURE. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1984, 45 (C8), pp.C8-145-C8-148. 10.1051/jphyscol:1984826. jpa-00224326 HAL Id: jpa-00224326 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224326 Submitted on 1 Jan 1984 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C8, supplement au n°ll, Tome k5, novembre 198* page C8-145 PROPERTIES OF ACTINIDE METALS UNDER HIGH PRESSURE U. Benedict Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre, Karlsruhe Establishment, European Institute for Transuranium Elements, Postfach 2266, D-7500 Karlsruhe, F.P.G. Résumé - Les propriétés des actinides sous pression sont discutées sur la base du dualisme entre électrons 5f localisés et délocalisés. Abstract - High pressure properties of the actinide metals are discussed on the basis of the dualism between localised and itinerant 5f electrons. INTRODUCTION Together with the gaseous elements, actinides are among those materials whose in­ tense study under high pressure has started only recently. Interest of solid state physicists in the high pressure properties of actinides arose mainly on the basis of high pressure studies of the so-called 4f elements, the lanthanides (Ln). The 5f shell being filled in the actinide (An) series, comparison of both series pro­ mised to give information on similarities and differences between the behaviour of the 4f and the 5f electrons. As in the high pressure study of other materials, the introduction of the diamond anvil cell (DAC) has greatly increased the accessible pressure range for the study of actinides. But with the exception of certain isotopes of thorium and uranium, actinides exhibit strong radioactivity. This property has in the past restricted their study to a few specialized laboratories. For actinides heavier than einsteini­ um (fermium, mendelevium, nobelium and lawrencium), the available amounts are too small to allow preparation of pure solids suitable for solid state studies. Ein- steinium-235, having a half-life of 20 days, can in principle be studied in the solid state immediately after its isolation, but no high pressure studies were made up to now. Actinium, which is in general discussed together with the actinides, is extremely difficult to handle due to its particularly high radioactivity; no high pressure studies were reported for this element either. The available experimental data on high pressure behaviour are thus limited to the remaining 9 elements: thorium, protactinium, uranium,neptunium, plutonium, americium, curium, berkelium and californium. ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE and PROPERTIES at AMBIENT PRESSURE and TEMPERATURE The solid state properties of the actinide metals are controlled by the dualism of the localised and the itinerant configuration of the 5f electrons /1-4/. Under ambient pressure, this dualism leads to the distinction of two main subgroups in the actinide series. The first subgroup, protactinium to plutonium, has its 5f electrons in an itinerant (delocalised) state. This means they &re of band type, hybridize with the conduction electrons and thus contribute to the metallic bonding. Magnetic order, which in the lanthanide metals is limited to the presence of localised 4f electrons,is con­ sequently not observed in this subgroup. The strengthening of the metallic bond by the 5f participation leads to small atomic volumes (Fig. 1), a high cohesive energy and low compressibility (Fig.2). Low symmetry (orthorhombic and monoclinic) crystal structures are found whose formation is probably related to the particular direc­ tional properties of the hybridized orbitals including a contribution from 5f electrons. Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1984826 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE 0~'"'"""'~ Ac Th Po U Np Pu Am Crn Bk Cf Es Fig.1 - Atomic volumes of actinide Fig.2 - Bulk moduli of the actinide metals, metals. compared to those of the lanthanide metals. The second subgroup, americium to cal ifornium, is characterised by localised 5f electrons. In terms of electron energy, this means that these electrons have sharp energylevelsand do not contribute to the metallic bond. In a spatial sense, it means that a particular 5f electron is fixed ("localised") to a particular actinide atom. In contrast to the first subgroup, the localised 5f electrons contribute to the appearance of magnetic order in curium, berkelium and californium. The atomic volumes are larger (Fig.l), thus closer to those of the trivalent lanthanide metals The cohesive energies are in general lower than those of the "itinerant" 5f metals. The compressibilities are also of the same order as those of the trivalent lantha- nides (Fig.2). The crystal structure of the four metals of the second subgroup is double-hexagonal close-packed (dhcp), thus of relatively high symmetry. The limit between the subgroups is not sharp. Americium has in some respect aninter- mediate position. Although its 5f electrons are localised, it does not exhibit magnetic order, and as we will see below, its 5f electrons can go itinerant by rela- tively moderate pressure. This makes americiuma particularly interesting metal to study. Thorium, the first member of the series, is in fact not a real actinide metal because its 5f levels are practically unoccupied in the ground state configuration. Filling of the 5f shell, which according to atomic number should begin at thorium, is delayed and starts only at the following element, protactinium. Thorium should thus be considered as a subgroup of its own, differing from the following elements (first subgroup) by e.g. a high symmetry (cubic close-packed, ccp) crystal structure, high atomic volume and higher compressibility. (Figs.1 and 2). THE EFFECT of PRESSURE The most remarkable effect of pressure on the actinide metals is that due to closer contact between the lattice atoms, localised 5f electrons can become itinerant, hy- bridise with the conduction electrons, and participate in the metallic bond. The subgroup with localised 5f electrons can thus under pressure acquire properties which, at ambient pressure, are characteristic for the subgroup Pa to Pu. Most of the data in this chapter are taken from a review published recently by the present author /5/. a) Th~rjum Compression data for thorium are available from shock wave tests up to 140 GPa and from X-ray diffraction up to 68 GPa. No phase transition was observed in the pres- sure range studied by X-ray diffraction. The electrical resistivity at room tempe- rature does not show an anomaly in the pressure range investioated (5 16 GPa). An unusual pressure dependence of the superconducting transition temperature was ob- served and believed to be due to either a change in the Fermi surface topology or a crystallographic phase change near 7 GPa. 5f electrons being itinerant in these metals at ambient pressure, no dramaticeffects are expected to occur under pressure at room temperature. Their room temperature crystal structures are conserved up to rather high pressures. Particularly high pressures have to be applied to these metals to provoke a phase transition: in ura- nium there are indications for a phase change around 71 GPa. p,T phase diagrams between room temperature and the melting point and up to moderate pressures havebeen determined, mainly by differential thermal analysis, for uranium, neptunium and plutonium. A common feature of the three phase diagrams is that at pressures above 3 GPa only two phases continue to exist, while 3 (U, Np) or 6(Pu) phases are observed at ambient pressure. Less dense high temperature phases are replaced by denser ones under the effect of pressure. Several groups of authors reported on the variation of the superconducting transition temperature T of uranium with pressures not exceeding 8.5 GPa. Particular features observed in t6e Tc(p) curve of single crystal a-U were ascribed to the low tempe- rature phase transitions which occur below 43 K at ambient pressure. C) M~L~!~-!~~~-!~E~!~S_E~-~~~~I~E~'"_~!S_I-AC~-C!~-E~~-C~ These four metals have recently been shown to undergo a phase transition under pres- sure which marks a transition from localised to itinerant 5f electrons. Starting from their dhcp forms, they first transform to the ccp structure, and an orthorhom- bic a-uranium type phase was reported for all of them as the phase existing at the highest pressures attained (Figs. 3, 4 and 5). An intermediate monoclinic phase was observed in americium, and an intermediate distorted ccp phase in californium. Low-symmetry orthorhombic and monoclinic phases were described above as being linked to 5f itinerancy in uranium, neptunium and plutonium. This correlation, together with the sharp volume decrease observed in Cm, Bk and Cf upon formation of the low- symmetry phases (Figs. 4 and 5), leads to the conclusion that the 5f electrons are itinerant in the orthorhombicandmonoclinic phases of Am, Cm, Bk and Cf. The pres- sure at which the low-symmetry structure forms ("delocalisation pressure") is par- ticularly high in curium. The 5f shell being half-filled in curium, this metal has the largest possible number of unpaired 5f electrons and thus a particularly large (in absolute value) spin-polarisation energy /3/. Spin-polarisation energy accounts for most of the energy gained when an actinide metal assumes the localised confi- guration; thus curium has the most stable localised 5f configuration, and this ex- plains why particularly high pressure has to be applied in this metal to delocalise the 5f electrons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of the Periodic Table and Its Consequences Citation: J
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia The Development of the Periodic Table and its Consequences Citation: J. Emsley (2019) The Devel- opment of the Periodic Table and its Consequences. Substantia 3(2) Suppl. 5: 15-27. doi: 10.13128/Substantia-297 John Emsley Copyright: © 2019 J. Emsley. This is Alameda Lodge, 23a Alameda Road, Ampthill, MK45 2LA, UK an open access, peer-reviewed article E-mail: [email protected] published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) and distributed under the terms of the Abstract. Chemistry is fortunate among the sciences in having an icon that is instant- Creative Commons Attribution License, ly recognisable around the world: the periodic table. The United Nations has deemed which permits unrestricted use, distri- 2019 to be the International Year of the Periodic Table, in commemoration of the 150th bution, and reproduction in any medi- anniversary of the first paper in which it appeared. That had been written by a Russian um, provided the original author and chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev, and was published in May 1869. Since then, there have source are credited. been many versions of the table, but one format has come to be the most widely used Data Availability Statement: All rel- and is to be seen everywhere. The route to this preferred form of the table makes an evant data are within the paper and its interesting story. Supporting Information files. Keywords. Periodic table, Mendeleev, Newlands, Deming, Seaborg. Competing Interests: The Author(s) declare(s) no conflict of interest. INTRODUCTION There are hundreds of periodic tables but the one that is widely repro- duced has the approval of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and is shown in Fig.1.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCIUM Element Symbol: Fr Atomic Number: 87
    FRANCIUM Element Symbol: Fr Atomic Number: 87 An initiative of IYC 2011 brought to you by the RACI KAYE GREEN www.raci.org.au FRANCIUM Element symbol: Fr Atomic number: 87 Francium (previously known as eka-cesium and actinium K) is a radioactive metal and the second rarest naturally occurring element after Astatine. It is the least stable of the first 103 elements. Very little is known of the physical and chemical properties of Francium compared to other elements. Francium was discovered by Marguerite Perey of the Curie Institute in Paris, France in 1939. However, the existence of an element of atomic number 87 was predicted in the 1870s by Dmitri Mendeleev, creator of the first version of the periodic table, who presumed it would have chemical and physical properties similar to Cesium. Several research teams attempted to isolate this missing element, and there were at least four false claims of discovery during which it was named Russium (after the home country of soviet chemist D. K. Dobroserdov), Alkalinium (by English chemists Gerald J. K. Druce and Frederick H. Loring as the heaviest alkali metal), Virginium (after Virginia, home state of chemist Fred Allison), and Moldavium (by Horia Hulubei and Yvette Cauchois after Moldavia, the Romanian province where they conducted their work). Perey finally discovered Francium after purifying radioactive Actinium-227 from Lanthanum, and detecting particles decaying at low energy levels not previously identified. The new product exhibited chemical properties of an alkali metal (such as co-precipitating with Cesium salts), which led Perey to believe that it was element 87, caused by the alpha radioactive decay of Actinium-227.
    [Show full text]
  • The Separation of Bismuth-213 from Actinium-225 and the Ion Exchange Properties of the Alkali Metal Cations with an Inorganic Resin
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2017 The Separation of Bismuth-213 from Actinium-225 and the Ion Exchange Properties of the Alkali Metal Cations with an Inorganic Resin Mark Alan Moore University of Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Moore, Mark Alan, "The Separation of Bismuth-213 from Actinium-225 and the Ion Exchange Properties of the Alkali Metal Cations with an Inorganic Resin. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4848 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Mark Alan Moore entitled "The Separation of Bismuth-213 from Actinium-225 and the Ion Exchange Properties of the Alkali Metal Cations with an Inorganic Resin." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Chemical Engineering. Robert Counce, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Paul Dalhaimer, Howard Hall, George Schweitzer, Jack Watson Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Separation of Bismuth-213 from Actinium-225 and the Ion Exchange Properties of the Alkali Metal Cations with an Inorganic Resin A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Mark Alan Moore December 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • Actinide Ground-State Properties-Theoretical Predictions
    Actinide Ground-State Properties Theoretical predictions John M. Wills and Olle Eriksson electron-electron correlations—the electronic energy of the ground state of or nearly fifty years, the actinides interactions among the 5f electrons and solids, molecules, and atoms as a func- defied the efforts of solid-state between them and other electrons—are tional of electron density. The DFT Ftheorists to understand their expected to affect the bonding. prescription has had such a profound properties. These metals are among Low-symmetry crystal structures, impact on basic research in both the most complex of the long-lived relativistic effects, and electron- chemistry and solid-state physics that elements, and in the solid state, they electron correlations are very difficult Walter Kohn, its main inventor, was display some of the most unusual to treat in traditional electronic- one of the recipients of the 1998 behaviors of any series in the periodic structure calculations of metals and, Nobel Prize in Chemistry. table. Very low melting temperatures, until the last decade, were outside the In general, it is not possible to apply large anisotropic thermal-expansion realm of computational ability. And DFT without some approximation. coefficients, very low symmetry crystal yet, it is essential to treat these effects But many man-years of intense research structures, many solid-to-solid phase properly in order to understand the have yielded reliable approximate transitions—the list is daunting. Where physics of the actinides. Electron- expressions for the total energy in does one begin to put together an electron correlations are important in which all terms, except for a single- understanding of these elements? determining the degree to which 5f particle kinetic-energy term, can be In the last 10 years, together with electrons are localized at lattice sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Periodic Table of the Elements
    The Periodic Table of the Elements The president of the Inorganic Chemistry Division, atomic number was the same as the number of protons Gerd Rosenblatt, recognizing that the periodic table in each element. of the elements found in the “Red Book” A problem for Mendeleev’s table was the position- (Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, published in ing of the rare earth or lanthanoid* elements. These 1985) needed some updating—particularly elements elements had properties and atomic weight values above 103, including element 110 (darmstadtium)— similar to one another but that did not follow the reg- made a formal request to Norman Holden and Tyler ularities of the table. Eventually, they were placed in a Coplen to prepare an updated table. This table can be separate area below the main table. found below, on the IUPAC Web site, and as a tear-off The Danish physicist Niels Henrik David Bohr pro- on the inside back cover of this issue. posed his electronic orbital structure of the atom in 1921, which explained the problem of the rare earth by Norman Holden and Ty Coplen elements. The electrons in the outermost and the penultimate orbits are called valence electrons since generally their actions account for the valence of the he Russian chemist Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev element (i.e., electrons capable of taking part in the constructed his original periodic table in 1869 links between atoms). Chemical behavior of an ele- Tusing as its organizing principle his formulation ment depends on its valence electrons, so that when of the periodic law: if the chemical elements are only inner orbit electrons are changing from one ele- arranged in the ascending order of their atomic ment to another, there is not much difference in the weights, then at certain regular intervals (periods) chemical properties between the elements.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRONEGATIVITY D Qkq F=
    ELECTRONEGATIVITY The electronegativity of an atom is the attracting power that the nucleus has for it’s own outer electrons and those of it’s neighbours i.e. how badly it wants electrons. An atom’s electronegativity is determined by Coulomb’s Law, which states, “ the size of the force is proportional to the size of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them”. In symbols it is represented as: kq q F = 1 2 d 2 where: F = force (N) k = constant (dependent on the medium through which the force is acting) e.g. air q1 = charge on an electron (C) q2 = core charge (C) = no. of protons an outer electron sees = no. of protons – no. of inner shell electrons = main Group Number d = distance of electron from the nucleus (m) Examples of how to calculate the core charge: Sodium – Atomic number 11 Electron configuration 2.8.1 Core charge = 11 (no. of p+s) – 10 (no. of inner e-s) +1 (Group i) Chlorine – Atomic number 17 Electron configuration 2.8.7 Core charge = 17 (no. of p+s) – 10 (no. of inner e-s) +7 (Group vii) J:\Sciclunm\Resources\Year 11 Chemistry\Semester1\Notes\Atoms & The Periodic Table\Electronegativity.doc Neon holds onto its own electrons with a core charge of +8, but it can’t hold any more electrons in that shell. If it was to form bonds, the electron must go into the next shell where the core charge is zero. Group viii elements do not form any compounds under normal conditions and are therefore given no electronegativity values.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table of the Elements Notes
    Periodic Table of the Elements Notes Arrangement of the known elements based on atomic number and chemical and physical properties. Divided into three basic categories: Metals (left side of the table) Nonmetals (right side of the table) Metalloids (touching the zig zag line) Basic Organization by: Atomic structure Atomic number Chemical and Physical Properties Uses of the Periodic Table Useful in predicting: chemical behavior of the elements trends properties of the elements Atomic Structure Review: Atoms are made of protons, electrons, and neutrons. Elements are atoms of only one type. Elements are identified by the atomic number (# of protons in nucleus). Energy Levels Review: Electrons are arranged in a region around the nucleus called an electron cloud. Energy levels are located within the cloud. At least 1 energy level and as many as 7 energy levels exist in atoms Energy Levels & Valence Electrons Energy levels hold a specific amount of electrons: 1st level = up to 2 2nd level = up to 8 3rd level = up to 8 (first 18 elements only) The electrons in the outermost level are called valence electrons. Determine reactivity - how elements will react with others to form compounds Outermost level does not usually fill completely with electrons Using the Table to Identify Valence Electrons Elements are grouped into vertical columns because they have similar properties. These are called groups or families. Groups are numbered 1-18. Group numbers can help you determine the number of valence electrons: Group 1 has 1 valence electron. Group 2 has 2 valence electrons. Groups 3–12 are transition metals and have 1 or 2 valence electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Protactinium
    Human Health Fact Sheet ANL, November 2001 Protactinium What Is It? Protactinium is a malleable, shiny, silver-gray radioactive metal that Symbol: Pa does not tarnish rapidly in air. It has a density greater than that of lead and occurs in nature in very low concentrations as a decay product of uranium. There are three Atomic Number: 91 naturally occurring isotopes, with protactinium-231 being the most abundant. (protons in nucleus) (Isotopes are different forms of an element that have the same number of protons in Atomic Weight: 231 the nucleus but a different number of neutrons.) The other two naturally occurring (naturally occurring) isotopes are protactinium-234 and protactinium-234m (the “m” meaning metastable), both of which have very short half-lives (6.7 hours and 1.2 minutes, respectively) and occur in extremely low concentrations. Protactinium was first identified in 1913 by Kasimir Fajans and O.H. Gohring (as the isotope protactinium-234m), and protactinium-231 was identified in 1917. The name comes from the Greek work protos (meaning first) and the element actinium, because protactinium is the precursor of actinium. Of the 20 known isotopes of protactinium, only protactinium-231 has a half-life greater than one year and is a concern for Department of Energy (DOE) environmental management sites. The half-lives of all other protactinium isotopes Radioactive Properties of the Key Protactinium Isotope are less than a month. Protactinium-231 is a and Associated Radionuclides Natural decay product of Specific Radiation Energy (MeV) Abun- Decay uranium-235 and is Isotope Half-Life Activity dance Mode Alpha Beta Gamma present at sites that (Ci/g) (%) (α) (β) (γ) processed uranium α ores and associated Pa231 33,000 yr >99 .048 5.0 0.065 0.048 wastes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genius of the Periodic Table
    GENIUS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE "Isn't it the work of a genius'. " exclaimed Academician V.I. Spitsyn, USSR, a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee when talking to an Agency audience in January. His listeners shared his enthusiasm. Academician Spitsyn was referring to the to the first formulation a hundred years ago by Professor Dmitry I. Mendeleyev of the Periodic Law of Elements. In conditions of enormous difficulty, considering the lack of data on atomic weights of elements, Mendeleyev created in less than two years work at St. Petersburg University, a system of chemical elements that is, in general, still being used. His law became a powerful instrument for further development of chemistry and physics. He was able immediately to correct the atomic weight numbers of some elements, including uranium, whose atomic weight he found to be double that given at the time. Two years later Mendeleyev went so far as to give a detailed description of physical or chemical properties of some elements which were as yet undiscovered. Time gave striking proof of his predictions and his periodic law. Mendeleyev published his conclusions in the first place by sending, early in March 186 9, a leaflet to many Russian and foreign scientists. It gave his system of elements based on their atomic weights and chemical resemblance. On the 18th March that year his paper on the subject was read at the meeting of the Russian Chemical Society, and two months later the Society's Journal published his article entitled "The correlation between properties of elements and their atomic weight".
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table P J STEWART / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY PHOTO SCIENCE / STEWART J P
    Periodic table P J STEWART / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY PHOTO SCIENCE / STEWART J P 46 | Chemistry World | March 2009 www.chemistryworld.org Periodic change The periodic table, cherished by generations of chemists, has steadily evolved over time. Eric Scerri is among those now calling for drastic change The periodic table has become recurrences as vertical columns or something of a style icon while In short groups. remaining indispensable to chemists. In its original form The notion of chemical reactivity Over the years the table has had the periodic table was is something of a vague one. To make to change to accommodate new relatively simple. Over this idea more precise, the periodic elements. But some scientists the years, extra elements table pioneers focused on the propose giving the table a makeover have been added and the maximum valence of each element while others call for drastic changes layout of the transition and looked for similarities among to its core structure. elements altered these quantities (see Mendeleev’s More than 1000 periodic systems Some call for drastic table, p48). have been published since the table rearrangements, The method works very well for Russian chemist Dimitri Mendeleev perhaps placing hydrogen the elements up to atomic weight developed the mature periodic with the halogens. 55 (manganese) after which point system – the most fundamental A new block may be it starts to fall apart. Although natural system of classification needed when chemists there seems to be a repetition in the ever devised. (Not to mention the can make elements in highest valence of aluminium and hundreds if not thousands of new the g-block, starting at scandium (3), silicon and titanium systems that have appeared since the element 121 (4), phosphorus and vanadium (5), advent of the internet.) and chlorine and manganese (7), Such a proliferation prompts this is not the case with potassium questions as to whether some tables and iron.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Behaviour of Polonium
    technical reportS series no. 484 Technical Reports SeriEs No. 484 The Environmental Behaviour of Polonium F. Carvalho, S. Fernandes, S. Fesenko, E. Holm, B. Howard, The Environmental Behaviour of Polonium P. Martin, M. Phaneuf, D. Porcelli, G. Pröhl, J. Twining @ THE ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF POLONIUM The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GEORGIA OMAN ALBANIA GERMANY PAKISTAN ALGERIA GHANA PALAU ANGOLA GREECE PANAMA ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA GUATEMALA PAPUA NEW GUINEA ARGENTINA GUYANA PARAGUAY ARMENIA HAITI PERU AUSTRALIA HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES AUSTRIA HONDURAS POLAND AZERBAIJAN HUNGARY PORTUGAL BAHAMAS ICELAND QATAR BAHRAIN INDIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BANGLADESH INDONESIA ROMANIA BARBADOS IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELARUS IRAQ RWANDA BELGIUM IRELAND SAN MARINO BELIZE ISRAEL SAUDI ARABIA BENIN ITALY SENEGAL BOLIVIA, PLURINATIONAL JAMAICA SERBIA STATE OF JAPAN SEYCHELLES BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JORDAN SIERRA LEONE BOTSWANA KAZAKHSTAN SINGAPORE BRAZIL KENYA SLOVAKIA BRUNEI DARUSSALAM KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA BULGARIA KUWAIT SOUTH AFRICA BURKINA FASO KYRGYZSTAN SPAIN BURUNDI LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC SRI LANKA CAMBODIA REPUBLIC SUDAN CAMEROON LATVIA SWAZILAND CANADA LEBANON SWEDEN CENTRAL AFRICAN LESOTHO SWITZERLAND REPUBLIC LIBERIA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC CHAD LIBYA TAJIKISTAN CHILE LIECHTENSTEIN THAILAND CHINA LITHUANIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV COLOMBIA LUXEMBOURG REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CONGO MADAGASCAR TOGO COSTA RICA MALAWI TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CÔTE D’IVOIRE MALAYSIA TUNISIA CROATIA MALI
    [Show full text]
  • The Elements.Pdf
    A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division Presents Periodic Table of the Elements A Resource for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Students Click an element for more information: Group** Period 1 18 IA VIIIA 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2 1 H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIAVIIA He 1.008 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 4.003 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 Li Be B C N O F Ne 6.941 9.012 10.81 12.01 14.01 16.00 19.00 20.18 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 3 Na Mg IIIB IVB VB VIB VIIB ------- VIII IB IIB Al Si P S Cl Ar 22.99 24.31 3B 4B 5B 6B 7B ------- 1B 2B 26.98 28.09 30.97 32.07 35.45 39.95 ------- 8 ------- 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4 K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 39.10 40.08 44.96 47.88 50.94 52.00 54.94 55.85 58.47 58.69 63.55 65.39 69.72 72.59 74.92 78.96 79.90 83.80 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 Rb Sr Y Zr NbMo Tc Ru Rh PdAgCd In Sn Sb Te I Xe 85.47 87.62 88.91 91.22 92.91 95.94 (98) 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 127.6 126.9 131.3 55 56 57 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 6 Cs Ba La* Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt AuHg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 132.9 137.3 138.9 178.5 180.9 183.9 186.2 190.2 190.2 195.1 197.0 200.5 204.4 207.2 209.0 (210) (210) (222) 87 88 89 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 114 116 118 7 Fr Ra Ac~RfDb Sg Bh Hs Mt --- --- --- --- --- --- (223) (226) (227) (257) (260) (263) (262) (265) (266) () () () () () () http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/ (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 4:06:20 PM] A Periodic Table of the Elements at Los Alamos National Laboratory 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Lanthanide Series* Ce Pr NdPmSm Eu Gd TbDyHo Er TmYbLu 140.1 140.9 144.2 (147) 150.4 152.0 157.3 158.9 162.5 164.9 167.3 168.9 173.0 175.0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 Actinide Series~ Th Pa U Np Pu AmCmBk Cf Es FmMdNo Lr 232.0 (231) (238) (237) (242) (243) (247) (247) (249) (254) (253) (256) (254) (257) ** Groups are noted by 3 notation conventions.
    [Show full text]