DOCSLIB.ORG

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Draft EIS/EIR Chapter 3: Transportation WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Chapter 3: Transportation July 2021 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report LEAD AGENCIES: Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation; Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.: 2017061007 TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION: West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Additional written comments and/or questions concerning this document should be directed to the following: Meghna Khanna Charlene Lee Lorenzo Rusty Whisman Project Manager Director Transportation Program Los Angeles County Metropolitan Federal Transit Administration Specialist Transportation Authority Region 9 Federal Transit One Gateway Plaza, M/S 99-22-4 Los Angeles Office Administration Region 9 Los Angeles, CA 90012 888 S. Figueroa Street, 888 S. Figueroa Street, Phone: (213) 922-6262 Suite 440 Suite 440 [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90017 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 202-3952 Phone: (213) 202-3956 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Regulatory Setting ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Federal ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 State .......................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Regional/Local .......................................................................................... 3-3 3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1 Analysis Approach: Traffic Operations .................................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Analysis Approach: Transit ...................................................................... 3-9 3.2.3 Analysis Approach: Active Transportation ............................................ 3-10 3.2.4 Analysis Approach: Parking .................................................................... 3-10 3.2.5 Analysis Approach: Vehicle Miles Traveled ........................................... 3-11 3.2.6 Analysis Approach: CEQA Evaluation .................................................... 3-12 3.2.7 Analysis Approach: Construction .......................................................... 3-12 3.3 Affected Environment/Existing Conditions ........................................................... 3-12 3.3.1 Travel Demand in the Corridor .............................................................. 3-13 3.3.2 General Corridor-Wide Roadway Network Conditions ......................... 3-13 3.3.3 Freeways, Arterials, and Local Roads .................................................... 3-14 3.3.4 Intersections ........................................................................................... 3-17 3.3.5 Transit ..................................................................................................... 3-28 3.3.6 Active Transportation ............................................................................. 3-30 3.3.7 Parking .................................................................................................... 3-32 3.4 Environmental Consequences/Environmental Impacts ....................................... 3-36 3.4.1 Traffic Operations ................................................................................... 3-36 3.4.2 Transit ..................................................................................................... 3-55 3.4.3 Active Transportation ............................................................................. 3-67 3.4.4 Parking .................................................................................................... 3-72 3.5 Project Measures and Mitigation Measures .......................................................... 3-86 3.5.1 Project Measures .................................................................................... 3-86 3.5.2 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................. 3-87 3.6 California Environmental Quality Act Determination ......................................... 3-106 3.6.1 Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? ............................................................................. 3-106 3.6.2 Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ..................................................................... 3-111 3.6.3 Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ............................................................... 3-113 3.6.4 Result in inadequate emergency access? ............................................ 3-115 3.7 Construction ......................................................................................................... 3-117 3.7.1 Construction Activities ......................................................................... 3-117 3.7.2 Construction Methodology .................................................................. 3-140 3.7.3 Construction Impacts ........................................................................... 3-140 3.7.4 California Environmental Quality Act Determination ......................... 3-149 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Draft EIS/EIR Chapter 3: Transportation July 2021 | i Table of Contents Appendices Appendix D – West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Final Transportation Impact Analysis Report Appendix E – West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Final Land Use Impact Analysis Report Appendix F – West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report Appendix L – West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Construction Methods Report List of Tables Table 3.1. Transportation Analysis Approach ............................................................................. 3-4 Table 3.2. Intersection Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized, All-Way Stop, and Two-Way Stop Intersections .................................................................................................. 3-8 Table 3.3. Existing Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes and Average Truck Percentages on Freeways .................................................................................................... 3-15 Table 3.4. Major Roadway Facilities Serving the Study Area .................................................... 3-17 Table 3.5. Key Intersections—Existing Operations ................................................................... 3-23 Table 3.6. Trips by Mode – LA County ....................................................................................... 3-28 Table 3.7. Metrolink Line Service Frequency ............................................................................. 3-29 Table 3.8. On-Street Parking Conditions: Proposed Station Locations ................................... 3-33 Table 3.9. On-Street Parking Conditions: Along the Alignment ............................................... 3-33 Table 3.10. Off-Street Parking Conditions: Proposed Station Locations ................................. 3-34 Table 3.11. Comparison of Existing (2017) and Future (2042) No Build Intersection Operations ........................................................................................................................... 3-37 Table 3.12. No Build Alternative Operations (2042) ................................................................. 3-38 Table 3.13. Daily Ridership and Station Vehicular Demand—Build Alternatives (2042) ........ 3-43 Table 3.14. Alternative 2 Operations (2042) ............................................................................. 3-44 Table 3.15. Summary of Alternative 3 Intersection Operations Assessment .......................... 3-51 Table 3.16. Alternative 4 Intersection Adverse Effect Assessment ........................................... 3-52 Table 3.17. Daily Ridership and Station Vehicular Demand—Alternative 1 with Design Options 1 and 2 and Alternative 2 (2042) .......................................................................... 3-53 Table 3.18. Alternative 1 with Design Option 2 Operations (Design Option Specific) (2042) ................................................................................................................................... 3-54 Table 3.19. Proposed Headways for the Build Alternatives by Time Period ............................ 3-56 Table 3.20. Regional Transit Performance Metrics – Los Angeles County for No Build Alternative and Build Alternatives (2042) ........................................................................... 3-57 Table 3.21. WSAB Project and Metro Rail Daily Boardings by Line (within Study Area) for No Build Alternative and Alternative 1 (2042) .............................................................. 3-58 Table 3.22. Station Boardings for Alternative 1 (2042) ............................................................. 3-58 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project ii | July 2021 Draft EIS/EIR Chapter 3: Transportation Table of Contents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Walk-in Center Discharge 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT481 FT Silver Streak Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Bus stop for: EMS Flair Park (am/pm) Metro Parking Structure Division 9 Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577X Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EMS Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only Commuter 770 70 Connection Parking Building 13-0879 ©2012 LACMTA DEC 2012 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Hacienda Heights FT282 16 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 37th St/USC Transitway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Industry Å 194, FT282 13 16 Arcadia 268,
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service Plan
    Attachment A 1 Core Network Key spines in the network Highest investment in customer and operations infrastructure 53% of today’s bus riders use one of these top 25 corridors 2 81% of Metro’s bus riders use a Tier 1 or 2 Convenience corridor Network Completes the spontaneous-use network Focuses on network continuity High investment in customer and operations infrastructure 28% of today’s bus riders use one of the 19 Tier 2 corridors 3 Connectivity Network Completes the frequent network Moderate investment in customer and operations infrastructure 4 Community Network Focuses on community travel in areas with lower demand; also includes Expresses Minimal investment in customer and operations infrastructure 5 Full Network The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 6 Attachment A NextGen Transit First Service Change Proposals by Line Existing Weekday Frequency Proposed Weekday Frequency Existing Saturday Frequency Proposed Saturday Frequency Existing Sunday Frequency Proposed Sunday Frequency Service Change ProposalLine AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl R2New Line 2: Merge Lines 2 and 302 on Sunset Bl with Line 200 (Alvarado/Hoover): 15 15 15 20 30 60 7.5 12 7.5 15 30 60 12 15 15 20 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 20 20 20 30 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 •E Ğǁ >ŝŶĞϮǁ ŽƵůĚĨŽůůŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ>ŝŶĞƐϮΘϯϬϮƌŽƵƚĞƐŽŶ^ƵŶƐĞƚůďĞƚǁ
    [Show full text]
  • West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project
    Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: WSP 444 South Flower Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90071 July 2021 Authors AUTHORS Charlie Hetland, Jacobs John Simon, Jacobs Ryo Nagai, Jacobs Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Alternatives Evaluation, Screening and Selection Process .................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Purpose and Structure .............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 General Background ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Safety .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 Security ................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.3 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................ 1-5 1.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 1-6 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis LAOG1094
    PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation RTIP ID#: LAOG1094 The West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor (Project) is currently programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program as Study Only and funding is provided for preliminary engineering. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is seeking a Record of Decision (ROD) on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), although federal funding has not been fully programmed. Metro anticipates that a ROD will facilitate the pursuit of federal funds. Importantly, the Conformity Determination is required by FTA prior to circulation of the Draft EIS. Public review of the EIS is anticipated for mid-2021. TCWG Consideration Date: January 26, 2021 Project Description Metro, in cooperation with FTA, is proposing an electrically powered light rail transit (LRT) line that would extend up to 19 miles from downtown Los Angeles through southeast Los Angeles County. The Project location is shown in Figure 1. The Project would provide reliable, fixed-guideway transit service that would increase mobility and connectivity for historically underserved, transit-dependent, and environmental justice communities; reduce travel times on local and regional transportation networks; and accommodate substantial future employment and population growth. The Project includes four Build Alternatives that would extend from different termini in the north to the same terminus in the City of Artesia in the south. These Build Alternatives are as follows: • Alternative 1: Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) to Pioneer Station; the northern terminus would be located underground at LAUS Forecourt. This alignment length would be 19.3 miles and include 11 stations and 22 traction power substations (TPSS).
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Harbor Subdivision
    South Bay Cities Railroad Study BNSF Harbor Subdivision Final Report Prepared for: Southern California Association of Governments In Coordination with South Bay Cities Council of Governments The preparation of this report was financed in part through grants from the United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration – under provisions of the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century. Additional financial assistance was provided by the California State Department of Transportation. Prepared by: Wilbur Smith Associates Schiermeyer Consulting Services Cheryl Downey February 28, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Project Overview .................................................................................................... ES-1 How the Study was done......................................................................................... ES-1 Recommendations................................................................................................... ES-2 Next Steps ............................................................................................................... ES-2 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Study........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Study Process................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Agencies Consulted.......................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Legal Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Register Here
    TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS ADVISORY COUNCIL (TBAC) WEB BASED / ONLINE GENERAL MEETING Thursday, June 3, 2021 Meeting Time: 9:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. AGENDA REGISTER HERE: https://tbacgeneralmeeting6-2021.eventbrite.com During this current period of minimizing health risks and promoting personal and regional safety, we are providing web based online meetings per Mayor Garcetti’s “Safer at Home” order. The purpose of this meeting is to share information that may be helpful in supporting small and diverse businesses as TBAC serves in an advisory role to Metro. Please click on the link above to join the discussion at the listed time. This is a free online meeting and it is always open to the public. Please note that the link above is the official link to register for the meeting. Do not register through any other links. # Topic and Presenter(s) Purpose and Process I Call to Order, Chair S. Rourk II Safety & Security Briefing, Metro Introductions may be modified during online meetings. Welcome and Introductions, Chair S. Rourk Metro Quorum Confirmation, Secretary TBD Voting Members: Organization Info & Introduction Packet Review & Code of Conduct, Exec Committee Nonvoting Members: Introduction & Process and Procedures, Exec Committee Organization Represented Executive Committee: Introductions Welcome to New General Public Attendees III Metro Chair Representative California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Division 12 Chapter 2 130051.19.(c) IV Chair Comments, Chair S. Rourk V Meeting Minutes Review and Approve Review & approve May 2021 Online Meeting Minutes VI Metro Contracting Opportunities All may inquire Procurement/Contract Look-Ahead Questions must adhere to upcoming contract All Areas: Construction/Professional opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Programming Committee Agenda
    Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles, CA Agenda - Final Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:00 PM One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, 3rd Floor, Metro Board Room Planning and Programming Committee Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker, Chair Mark Ridley-Thomas, Vice Chair Mike Bonin Janice Hahn Ara Najarian John Bulinski, non-voting member Phillip A. Washington, Chief Executive Officer METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO BOARD COMMITTEES) PUBLIC INPUT A member of the public may address the Board on agenda items, before or during the Board or Committee’s consideration of the item for one (1) minute per item, or at the discretion of the Chair. A request to address the Board should be submitted in person at the meeting to the Board Secretary . Individuals requesting to speak on more than three (3) agenda items will be allowed to speak up to a maximum of three (3) minutes per meeting. For individuals requiring translation service, time allowed will be doubled. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in accordance with the Brown Act, this agenda does not provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board on any Consent Calendar agenda item that has already been considered by a Committee, composed exclusively of members of the Board, at a public meeting wherein all interested members of the public were afforded the opportunity to address the Committee on the item, before or during the Committee’s consideration of the item, and which has not been substantially changed since the Committee heard the item.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle River Main Office 11471 Business Blvd Eagle River
    POST OFFICE NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE EAGLE RIVER MAIN OFFICE 11471 BUSINESS BLVD EAGLE RIVER AK 99577 HUFFMAN 1221 HUFFMAN PARK DR ANCHORAGE AK 99515 DOWNTOWN STATION 315 BARNETTE ST FAIRBANKS AK 99701 KETCHIKAN MAIN OFFICE 3609 TONGASS AVE KETCHIKAN AK 99901 MIDTOWN STATION 3721 B ST ANCHORAGE AK 99503 WASILLA MAIN OFFICE 401 N MAIN ST WASILLA AK 99654 ANCHORAGE MAIN OFFICE 4141 POSTMARK DR ANCHORAGE AK 99530 KODIAK MAIN OFFICE 419 LOWER MILL BAY RD KODIAK AK 99615 PALMER MAIN OFFICE 500 S COBB ST PALMER AK 99645 COLLEGE BRANCH 755 FAIRBANKS ST FAIRBANKS AK 99709 MENDENHALL STATION 9491 VINTAGE BLVD JUNEAU AK 99801 SYLACAUGA MAIN OFFICE 1 S BROADWAY AVE SYLACAUGA AL 35150 SCOTTSBORO POST OFFICE 101 S MARKET ST SCOTTSBORO AL 35768 ANNISTON MAIN OFFICE 1101 QUINTARD AVE ANNISTON AL 36201 TALLADEGA MAIN OFFICE 127 EAST ST N TALLADEGA AL 35160 TROY MAIN OFFICE 1300 S BRUNDIDGE ST TROY AL 36081 PHENIX CITY MAIN OFFICE 1310 9TH AVE PHENIX CITY AL 36867 TUSCALOOSA MAIN OFFICE 1313 22ND AVE TUSCALOOSA AL 35401 CLAYTON MAIN OFFICE 15 S MIDWAY ST CLAYTON AL 36016 HOOVER POST OFFICE 1809 RIVERCHASE DR HOOVER AL 35244 MEADOWBROOK 1900 CORPORATE DR BIRMINGHAM AL 35242 FLORENCE MAIN OFFICE 210 N SEMINARY ST FLORENCE AL 35630 ALBERTVILLE MAIN OFFICE 210 S HAMBRICK ST ALBERTVILLE AL 35950 JASPER POST OFFICE 2101 3RD AVE S JASPER AL 35501 AUBURN MAIN OFFICE 300 OPELIKA RD AUBURN AL 36830 FORT PAYNE POST OFFICE 301 1ST ST E FORT PAYNE AL 35967 ROANOKE POST OFFICE 3078 HIGHWAY 431 ROANOKE AL 36274 BEL AIR STATION 3410 BEL AIR MALL MOBILE AL 36606
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Refinement Study
    July 2015 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Technical Refinement Study July 2015 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Technical Refinement Study Acknowledgements Agency Partners Metro Eco-Rapid Transit Southern California Association of Governments Caltrans Corridor Cities in Study Area City of Artesia City of Bell City of Bellflower City of Bell Gardens City of Cudahy City of Downey City of Huntington Park City of Lakewood City of Los Angeles City of Maywood City of Paramount City of South Gate City of Vernon Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff Cityworks Design Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Lenax Construction Services, Inc. Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction ES-2 SCAG Alternatives Analysis ES-4 Purpose of the Technical Refinement Study ES-6 Stakeholder Coordination ES-8 Study Summation ES-8 Summation of Alignment Studies ES-8 Summation of Station Studies ES-12 Ridership ES-18 Preliminary Cost Estimates ES-20 Study Findings ES-21 Alignments ES-21 Stations ES-22 Key Issues to Resolve During the Next Phase ES-24 1 Alignment Studies 1 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 East Bank 6 1.2.1 Alignment Description 6 1.2.2 Overview of Alignment Challenges 6 1.3 West Bank 3 8 1.3.1 Alignment Description 8 1.3.2 Overview of Alignment Challenges 10 1.4 Pacific Boulevard Corridor Options 12 1.4.1 Pacific/Alameda Option 12 1.4.2 Pacific/Vignes Option 16 1.5 Metro Blue Line / Alameda Street Options 20 1.5.1 Alameda Option 20 1.5.2 Alameda/Vignes Option 24 1.6 Alignment Study Findings 26 1.7 Alignments Considered and Removed
    [Show full text]
  • Line 125 (12/15/19) -- Metro Local
    Sunday and Holiday Schedule Effective Dec 15 2019 125 Eastbound Al Este (Approximate Times/Tiempos Aproximados) EL SEGUNDO LAWNDALE LOS ANGELES COMPTON DOWNEY NORWALK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plaza Douglas Rosecrans & Rosecrans & Compton Rosecrans & Rosecrans & Norwalk El Segundo Station Hawthorne Figueroa Station Long Beach Lakewood Station 6:00A 6:08A 6:15A 6:30A 6:44A 6:52A 7:05A 7:14A 6:52 7:02 7:11 7:27 7:43 7:53 8:07 8:16 7:49 7:59 8:07 8:24 8:40 8:50 9:05 9:16 8:39 8:49 8:57 9:14 9:31 9:41 9:57 10:08 9:28 9:38 9:48 10:06 10:24 10:34 10:51 11:02 10:09 10:20 10:31 10:49 11:07 11:17 11:34 11:45 10:41 10:52 11:03 11:21 11:40 11:50 12:07P 12:18P 11:11 11:22 11:33 11:51 12:10P 12:20P 12:37 12:48 11:40 11:51 12:03P 12:21P 12:40 12:51 1:08 1:19 12:10P 12:21P 12:33 12:51 1:10 1:21 1:38 1:49 12:43 12:54 1:06 1:25 1:44 1:55 2:12 2:23 1:18 1:29 1:41 2:00 2:19 2:30 2:47 2:58 1:54 2:05 2:17 2:36 2:55 3:06 3:23 3:34 2:29 2:40 2:52 3:11 3:29 3:40 3:57 4:08 3:04 3:15 3:27 3:46 4:04 4:15 4:31 4:42 3:46 3:57 4:09 4:27 4:45 4:55 5:11 5:22 4:34 4:45 4:57 5:15 5:33 5:43 5:59 6:10 5:32 5:42 5:54 6:12 6:28 6:38 6:54 7:05 6:29 6:39 6:50 7:08 7:24 7:33 7:48 7:58 7:28 7:38 7:48 8:05 8:21 8:29 8:42 8:52 Sunday and Holiday Schedule 125 Westbound Al Oeste (Approximate Times/Tiempos Aproximados) NORWALK DOWNEY COMPTON LOS ANGELES LAWNDALE EL SEGUNDO 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Norwalk Rosecrans & Rosecrans & Compton Rosecrans & Rosecrans & Douglas Plaza Station Lakewood Long Beach Station Figueroa Hawthorne Station El Segundo 6:30A 6:40A 6:55A 7:02A 7:20A 7:35A 7:43A 7:47A 7:27
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report: MSRC Contract MS21001 Dodger Stadium Express 2019 Season
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Final Report: MSRC Contract MS21001 Dodger Stadium Express 2019 Season Prepared for the Mobile Source Air Pollution Review Committee (MSRC) under the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program April 3, 2020 Acknowledgments The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), in cooperation with the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink), and the Los Angeles Dodgers, has provided bus service between Union Station and Dodger Stadium since 2010. Beginning in 2012, the Dodger Stadium Express (DSE) has been implemented with funding assistance from the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) Major Event Center Transportation Program, with the objective of reducing emissions from automobile trips and overall vehicle miles traveled. The 2019 season marked the third year Metro worked with its newest partner, Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). This season saw continued improvement in efficiency and expediency through continuous communication and strategic planning between Metro, LAPD, and the rest of the agencies that contribute to making this project a success. Key Personnel James Gallagher – Metro, Chief Operations Officer Sandra Solis – Metro, Director George del Valle – Metro, Project Contact Naomi Rodriguez – LA Dodgers, Senior Vice President, External Community Affairs Edward Yu – LADOT, Director of Transportation Blake Chow – LAPD, Deputy Chief, Transit Services Bureau Organizations Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles Department of Transportation Los Angeles Dodgers Los Angeles Police Department This report is submitted in fulfillment of Contract MS21001 and Dodger Stadium Express by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority under the partial sponsorship of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Line (910/950) GATEWAY Line 950 Only College, OC701, SC794, USC Shuttle; CARSON 37Th St/USC Station 110 E
    Monday through Friday Effective Jun 27 2021 J Line (Silver)910/950 Northbound to El Monte (Approximate Times) Southbound to San Pedro (ApproximateTimes) SAN HARBOR LOS DOWNTOWN LOS EL EL DOWNTOWN LOS LOS HARBOR SAN PEDRO GATEWAY ANGELES ANGELES MONTE MONTE ANGELES ANGELES GATEWAY PEDRO 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 ) ) A A B ) ) A A (See Note (See Note El Monte Bus Station Route & 21st Pacific Harbor Beacon Lot Park/Ride Harbor Gateway Center Transit Harbor Freeway Station C Line (Green) (See Note & 7th Figueroa UNION STATION Plz (Patsarouas Bwy Sta Flower & 7th Flower Harbor Freeway Station C Line (Green) (See Note Harbor Gateway Center Transit Harbor Beacon Lot Park/Ride & 21st Pacific Route El Monte Bus Station UNION STATION Plz (Patsarouas Bwy Sta 910 — — 4:40A 4:47A 5:06A 5:16A 5:31A 910 3:30A 3:44A 3:55A 4:12A 4:19A — — 950 4:28A 4:39A 4:56 5:03 5:22 5:32 5:47 950 4:00 4:14 4:25 4:42 4:49 5:05A 5:13A 910 — — 5:12 5:19 5:38 5:48 6:03 910 4:18 4:32 4:43 5:00 5:07 — — 910 — — 5:25 5:32 5:52 6:02 6:17 950 4:36 4:50 5:01 5:18 5:25 5:41 5:49 950 5:05 5:17 5:35 5:42 6:02 6:13 6:28 910 4:50 5:04 5:15 5:32 5:39 — — 910 — — 5:44 5:51 6:12 6:23 6:38 950 5:00 5:14 5:25 5:42 5:49 6:05 6:13 910 — — 5:52 5:59 6:20 6:31 6:46 910 5:10 5:24 5:35 5:52 5:59 — — 950 5:30 5:42 6:00 6:07 6:28 6:39 6:54 950 5:20 5:34 5:45 6:02 6:09 6:25 6:33 910 — — 6:08 6:15 6:36 6:47 7:02 910 5:30 5:44 5:55 6:13 6:20 — — 910 — — 6:15 6:22 6:43 6:54 7:09 910 5:40 5:54 6:05 6:23 6:30 — — 950 5:53 6:05 6:23 6:30 6:51 7:02 7:17 950 5:48 6:02 6:13 6:31 6:38 6:54 7:02 910 — —
    [Show full text]