DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft EIS/EIR Appendix G West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft EIS/EIR Appendix G West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Draft EIS/EIR Appendix G Final Communities and Neighborhoods Impact Analysis Report WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Appendix G Final Communities and Neighborhoods Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: WSP 444 South Flower Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90071 July 2021 Author(s) AUTHOR(S) Terry A. Hayes, AICP, Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. Allyson Dong, Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. Teresa Li, AICP, Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Alternatives Evaluation, Screening, and Selection Process ................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Purpose and Structure .............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 General Background ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 1-3 1.5.1 Data Gathering ..................................................................................... 1-3 1.5.2 Analysis ................................................................................................. 1-4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Geographic Sections............................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.1 Northern Section .................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.2 Southern Section .................................................................................. 2-6 2.2 No Build Alternative ............................................................................................. 2-6 2.3 Build Alternatives ................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.1 Proposed Alignment Configuration for the Build Alternatives .............. 2-9 2.3.2 Alternative 1: Los Angeles Union Station to Pioneer Station .............. 2-12 2.3.3 Alternative 2: 7th Street/Metro Center to Pioneer Station................... 2-15 2.3.4 Alternative 3: Slauson/A (Blue) Line to Pioneer Station ...................... 2-15 2.3.5 Alternative 4: I-105/C (Green) Line to Pioneer Station ........................ 2-15 2.3.6 Design Options................................................................................... 2-16 2.3.7 Maintenance and Storage Facility ....................................................... 2-16 2.3.8 Bellflower MSF Option........................................................................ 2-16 2.3.9 Paramount MSF Option ..................................................................... 2-16 3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Federal .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 State ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Regional................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3.1 2016-2040 SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy .......................................................................... 3-2 3.4 Local ..................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.4.1 City of Los Angeles General Plan .......................................................... 3-2 3.4.2 City of Los Angeles Land Use/Transportation Policy ............................ 3-5 3.4.3 Connect US Action Plan ........................................................................ 3-5 3.4.4 City of Vernon General Plan .................................................................. 3-5 3.4.5 Los Angeles County General Plan 2035................................................. 3-6 3.4.6 Florence-Firestone Community Plan, Los Angeles County.................... 3-6 3.4.7 City of Huntington Park General Plan ................................................... 3-7 3.4.8 City of Bell 2030 General Plan ............................................................... 3-7 3.4.9 City of Cudahy 2040 General Plan ......................................................... 3-9 3.4.10 City of South Gate General Plan 2035 ................................................... 3-9 3.4.11 City of South Gate Gateway District Specific Plan ............................... 3-10 3.4.12 City of South Gate Hollydale Village Specific Plan .............................. 3-10 3.4.13 City of Downey Vision 2025 ................................................................ 3-11 3.4.14 City of Paramount General Plan .......................................................... 3-11 3.4.15 City of Bellflower General Plan ............................................................ 3-12 3.4.16 City of Artesia General Plan 2030 ........................................................ 3-13 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Final Communities and Neighborhoods Impact Analysis Report July 2021 | i Table of Contents 3.4.17 City of Cerritos General Plan ............................................................... 3-13 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ..................... 4-1 4.1 Affected Area Communities and Neighborhoods..................................................4-1 4.1.1 Central City North .................................................................................4-8 4.1.2 Central City .......................................................................................... 4-12 4.1.3 Southeast Los Angeles ........................................................................ 4-13 4.1.4 Vernon ................................................................................................. 4-13 4.1.5 Florence-Firestone ............................................................................... 4-14 4.1.6 Huntington Park .................................................................................. 4-14 4.1.7 Bell ...................................................................................................... 4-16 4.1.8 Cudahy ................................................................................................ 4-17 4.1.9 South Gate .......................................................................................... 4-18 4.1.10 Downey ............................................................................................... 4-19 4.1.11 Paramount .......................................................................................... 4-20 4.1.12 Bellflower ............................................................................................. 4-21 4.1.13 Artesia ................................................................................................. 4-22 4.1.14 Cerritos ................................................................................................ 4-23 4.2 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Affected Area .............. 4-24 4.2.1 Population ........................................................................................... 4-24 4.2.2 Age ...................................................................................................... 4-25 4.2.3 Households ......................................................................................... 4-27 4.2.4 Employment ........................................................................................ 4-29 4.2.5 Race and Ethnicity ............................................................................... 4-30 4.2.6 Languages Spoken at Home ............................................................... 4-32 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .......................... 5-1 5.1 No Build Alternative ..............................................................................................5-1 5.2 Alternative 1: Los Angeles Union Station to Pioneer Station.................................5-1 5.2.1 Access and Mobility ..............................................................................5-1 5.2.2 Community Character and Cohesion.....................................................5-7 5.2.3 Community Stability ............................................................................ 5-17 5.3 Alternative 2: 7th Street/Metro Center to Pioneer Station ................................... 5-18 5.3.1 Access and Mobility ............................................................................ 5-18 5.3.2 Community Character and Cohesion................................................... 5-18 5.3.3 Community Stability ............................................................................ 5-20 5.4 Alternative 3: Slauson/A (Blue) Line to Pioneer Station ...................................... 5-20 5.4.1 Access and Mobility ............................................................................ 5-20 5.4.2 Community Character and Cohesion................................................... 5-21 5.4.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Walk-in Center Discharge 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT481 FT Silver Streak Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Bus stop for: EMS Flair Park (am/pm) Metro Parking Structure Division 9 Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577X Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EMS Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only Commuter 770 70 Connection Parking Building 13-0879 ©2012 LACMTA DEC 2012 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Hacienda Heights FT282 16 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 37th St/USC Transitway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Industry Å 194, FT282 13 16 Arcadia 268,
    [Show full text]
  • California Mobility Investment Opportunities
    CALIFORNIA MOBILITY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES Report Contributors This report was prepared for the Commission in partnership with the organizations listed below. Without their contributions this report would not have been possible. Alpine County Local Transportation Commission Amador County Transportation Commission Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments Calaveras Council of Governments California Association of Councils of Government California Department of Transportation California State Association of Counties California Transit Association County of San Benito Council of Governments Del Norte Local Transportation Commission Fresno Council of Governments Humboldt County Association of Governments Imperial County Transportation Commission Inyo County Local Transportation Commission Kern Council of Governments Kings County Association of Governments Lake County/City Area Planning Council League of California Cities Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Madera County Transportation Commission Mendocino Council of Governments Merced County Association of Governments Metropolitan Transportation Commission Modoc County Transportation Commission Mono County Local Transportation Commission Nevada County Transportation Commission North State Super-Region Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission Sacramento Area Council of Governments San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Diego Association of Governments San Joaquin Council of Governments San Luis Obispo Council of
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Eric Garcetti Announces Collaboration with Microsoft And
    A-14 LASENTINEL.NET NEWS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2020 Mayor Eric Garcetti announces Collaboration with Microsoft and Starry, Six Months of Free Internet Looking to Connect the Los Angeles Community BY BETTI HALSELL what was already a clear and communities. The lack of holds do not have a broad- President of Microsoft efficiently. The CEO and Co- Contributing Writer unmistakable fact: internet broadband networks can lead band subscription according Brad Smith stated, “This founder of Starry Chet Kano- connectivity is not a luxury in to less education, narrow to the mayor’s office. partnership with the City of jia stated, “We built our com- Working hard to close our time — it’s an absolute awareness, and disconnection This initiative is one of Los Angeles and Starry is an pany on the basic belief that racial gaps in opportunity, necessity for parents trying to to the rest of the world. many seeds planted and that important step towards ensur- everyone deserves access to Los Angeles City Mayor Eric work, students looking to Mayor Garcetti recognized took root from the Mayor’s ing that everyone, every- affordable, high-quality Garcetti announced a new learn, and families and the misstep among the city monthly Telecommunica- where can access today’s broadband no matter where directive to provide six friends seeking to communi- and now he has the footing to tions and Digital Equity essential online services.” you live...” months of free internet access cate.” Garcetti Continued, invest in a solution. The Forum. The city has seen the Smith continued. “…If we This is a coalition to residents in four public “With Starry and Microsoft effects of COVID-19 worked generosity from Starry Inter- fail to bring it to more people, between the Los Angeles housing communities across lending their resources and as high definition projector, net before back in June of this we risk widening, not closing City Mayor Administration, the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Agenda Item #4.1 Long Range Transportation Plan/Draft Potential
    Attachment A Proposed One-Half Cent Sales Tax for Transportation ATTACHMENT A Outline of Expenditure Categories DRAFT 40-Years: Fiscal Year (FY ) 2018 - 2057, Escalated Dollars (millions) % of First First 15 Second 15 Final 10 Sales Tax 40-Year Subfund Program Year Year Year Year (net of Amount* Amount Period Period Period Admin) Local Return Local Return (Local Projects and Transit 16%$ 136 2,610$ 7,480$ 9,090$ $ 19,180 Services) Highway Construction (includes 2% System Asset Highway, Projects - Ports Highway 17%$ 144 3,420$ 8,100$ 8,810$ $ 20,400 Active Congestion Programs, Goods Transportation, Movement) Complete Streets Metro Active Transportation Program (Capital) 2%$ 17 $ 470 940$ 980$ 2,400$ (Bicycle, Pedestrian, Complete Streets) Transit Construction (Includes Transit, 2% System Asset Projects - 35%$ 296 12,140$ 10,096$ 19,665$ $ 41,900 Airports and Transit Stations) First/Last Mile (Capital) Metro State of Good Repair 2%$ 17 $ 350 910$ $ 1,140 $ 2,400 Metro Rail Operations 5%$ 42 820$ 2,300$ 2,860$ $ 5,980 Transit Operations 20%$ 169 3,270$ 9,340$ 11,380$ $ 23,990 Transit (Metro & Municipal Providers) Operating & Maintenance ADA Paratransit for the disabled; Metro discounts for 2%$ 17 $ 350 960$ $ 1,090 $ 2,400 seniors and students Regional Rail 1%$ 8 180$ 460$ 560$ 1,200$ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 847 23,610$ 40,586$ 55,575$ 119,850$ 1.5% for Administration 1.50%$ 13 354$ 609$ 834$ $ 1,800 GRAND TOTAL $ 860 23,964$ 41,195$ 56,409$ 121,650$ * All totals are rounded; numbers presented in this document may not always add up to the totals provided.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 23, 2019 Shows a Map of the Corridor and Study Area, Which Includes One-Half Mile to Either Side of Verm�:Mt Avenue
    AUGUST 23, 2019 shows a map of the corridor and study area, which includes one-half mile to either side of Verm�:mt Avenue. The three potential.rail concepts include: 1) Light Rail Transit (LRT), 2) Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) with a direct connection to the Red Line; and 3) HRT with stand-alone operation (beginning/ending at Vermont/Wilshire). Because the cost of each rail alternative far exceeds the Measure M funding, staffinitially recommended advancing three BRT alternatives into environmental review. However, the April Board motion directed staffto also advance the three rail concepts into environmental review to preserve the ability to deliver rail transit should additional funding materialize. The motion also directed staff to include a feasibility study of extending the Vermont Transit Corridor to the South Bay Silver Line Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) transitway station to ensure regional connectivity. Environmental Review and South Bay Feasibility Study In order to address the April 25, 2019 Board motion, staffis developing separate procurement documents to conduct two parallel studies. Given the importance of the Vermont Transit Corridor and desire to meet the Measure M opening date, staff will proceed with advancing the three BRT and three rail alternatives between Hollywood Boulevard and 120th Street into environmental review. This effortis anticipated to take approximately 24 months from contract award through completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The six alternatives being studied in the EIR include: 1) End-to-end side-running BRT 2) Combination side- and center-running BRT 3) End-to-end center-running BRT (including possible grade separation) 4) LRT 5) HRT with direct connection to Red Line 6) HRT stand-alone service (beginning/ending at Vermont/Wilshire) The second study assesses the feasibility of extending the BRT and rail alternatives 10 miles from 120th Street to the South Bay Silver Line PCH transitwaystation.
    [Show full text]
  • West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project
    Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: WSP 444 South Flower Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90071 July 2021 Authors AUTHORS Charlie Hetland, Jacobs John Simon, Jacobs Ryo Nagai, Jacobs Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Alternatives Evaluation, Screening and Selection Process .................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Purpose and Structure .............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 General Background ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Safety .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 Security ................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.3 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................ 1-5 1.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 1-6 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis LAOG1094
    PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation RTIP ID#: LAOG1094 The West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor (Project) is currently programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program as Study Only and funding is provided for preliminary engineering. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is seeking a Record of Decision (ROD) on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), although federal funding has not been fully programmed. Metro anticipates that a ROD will facilitate the pursuit of federal funds. Importantly, the Conformity Determination is required by FTA prior to circulation of the Draft EIS. Public review of the EIS is anticipated for mid-2021. TCWG Consideration Date: January 26, 2021 Project Description Metro, in cooperation with FTA, is proposing an electrically powered light rail transit (LRT) line that would extend up to 19 miles from downtown Los Angeles through southeast Los Angeles County. The Project location is shown in Figure 1. The Project would provide reliable, fixed-guideway transit service that would increase mobility and connectivity for historically underserved, transit-dependent, and environmental justice communities; reduce travel times on local and regional transportation networks; and accommodate substantial future employment and population growth. The Project includes four Build Alternatives that would extend from different termini in the north to the same terminus in the City of Artesia in the south. These Build Alternatives are as follows: • Alternative 1: Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) to Pioneer Station; the northern terminus would be located underground at LAUS Forecourt. This alignment length would be 19.3 miles and include 11 stations and 22 traction power substations (TPSS).
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Program Management Master Schedule June 2019
    j Metro Program Management Master Schedule June 2019 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Type Project Name 20182018 20192019 20202020 20212021 20222022 20232023 20242024 20252025 20262026 20272027 20282028 20292029 20302030 20312031 20322032 20332033 20342034 20352035 20362036 20372037 20382038 20392039 20402040 20412041 20422042 20432043 20442044 20452045 20462046 20472047 20482048 20492049 20502050 20512051 20522052 20532053 20542054 20552055 20562056 20572057 20582058 20592059 20602060 20612061 20622062 20632063 20642064 20652065 20662066 20672067 20682068 20692069 20702070 Transit Rail Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Regional Connector Transit Corridor Westside Purple Line Extension Section 1 Westside Purple Line Extension Section 2 Westside Purple Line Extension Section 3 Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B (Phase 1 & 2) West Santa Ana Transit Corridor LRT (Phase 1 & 2) East SF Valley Transit Corridor Project Green Line Extension to Crenshaw Blvd in Torrance Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 (Align 1 & 2) Sepulveda Phases 2 & 3 Crenshaw Northern Extension Green Line Eastern Extension (Norwalk) Orange Line Conversion to Light Rail Transit BRT Orange Line Grade Separations North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT North San Fernando Valley BRT Improvements Vermont Transit Corridor Lincoln BRT Corridor Transit Airport Metro Connector Facilities Link Union Station Highway I-5 Carmenita Road Interchange Congestion Relief I-5 North Capacity Enhancements SR-134-SR-118 I-5 South Capacity Enhancements I-605 to Orange County I-5 N Cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Guide a Tour of Metro’S Artwork Metro Commissions Artists to Create Engaging and Thought-Provoking Artworks to Make Your Journey More Inviting and Pleasurable
    metro.net Art Guide A tour of Metro’s artwork Metro commissions artists to create engaging and thought-provoking artworks to make your journey more inviting and pleasurable. The artworks weave a multi-layered cultural tapestry that mirrors Los Angeles County’s rich contemporary and popular cultures. Established in 1989, the Metro Art program has commissioned over 250 artists for a wide variety of both temporary and permanent projects. explore Artists are selected through a peer review process with community input; all works are created especially for their transit related sites. This guide is intended to help you discover artworks throughout the Metro system. For more detailed information on the artwork and the artists, please visit metro.net/art. Artwork copyrighted, all rights reserved. Metro Lines and Transitways Metro Contents Art’s a Trip. Art’s a Trip Metro Environments Free Metro Rail Tours Tours are o=ered the >rst Saturday, > Thursdays – Meet at 7pm at Sunday and Thursday of each month. the street level entrance to the Metro Rail Metro Customer Center It’s free. It’s provocative. The tours are roundtrip and last Hollywood/Highland Metro l Metro Red Line Metro Vehicles It’s a great ride. approximately two hours. Rail Station. Union Station Bus Plaza l Metro Purple Line Tours for groups of 15 or more are > Saturdays – Meet at 10am at > Each tour is unique, visits l Metro Gold Line Metro Headquarters available by special arrangement. the street level entrance to the di=erent stations and is led Metro Division 3 Hollywood/Highland Metro by a member of the Metro Art l Metro Blue Line Call 213 .922.2738 for information Rail Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Incentivizing Zero-Emission Vehicle Ride-Hail/Public Transit Commutes in Los Angeles
    Incentivizing Zero-Emission Vehicle Ride-Hail/Public Transit Commutes in Los Angeles April 2018 By Juan M. Matute Herbie Huff Riley O’Brien Brian D. Taylor 1 Acknowledgements The research team received funding from the UCLA ​ ​ Sustainable Los Angeles Grand Challenge. From ​ ​ understanding future climate patterns and maximizing the region's solar potential, to understanding how gender plays a role in reducing our daily water use and revolutionizing plant and animal conservation management, we are spearheading the research necessary to define the region's pathway to sustainability. The research team also received support from the UCLA ​ Institute of Transportation Studies. The mission of the ​ UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, one of the leading transportation policy research centers in the United States, is to support and advance cutting-edge research, the highest-quality education, and meaningful and influential civic engagement on the many pressing transportation issues facing our cities, state, nation, and world today. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 6 Project Research Objectives 6 Prior Research and Background 7 Transportation Network Companies 7 Overview 7 TNC-Transit Integration 10 Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) Adoption 11 Clean Vehicle Adoption Overview 11 Plug-in hybrids and fully electric vehicles 11 Hydrogen fuel cell incentives 13 TNCs and ZEVs 13 Employee Commutes 13 Policy Setting and Background 14 State Policy Setting 14 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and 2016 Update 14 Governor’s Zero
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Pico Rivera
    LIVING INPICORIVERA RESIDENTS’ GUIDE WELCOMEto the City of Pico Rivera Contents On behalf of the City Council, City Staff, residents and businesses, Welcome to the City of Pico Rivera. This guide has been developed to assist you with obtaining City services and to familiarize you with the many outstanding programs that we have for youth, adults and seniors. We hope you will take advantage of the many programs and award winning public facilities that we have right here in the City of Pico Rivera. As you drive through our City, you will notice the progress that is being made. Over the past few years, the City has been working hard to ensure a bright 2 Pico Rivera City Services and promising future for many generations to enjoy. The City concluded a multi-year Parks Renovation Alphabetical Listing of Services Project, a project that saw four of the City’s major 4 parks get overhauled with state of the art landscaping and sports fields. A new library will be completed 16 Award-Winning Programs later in 2013. This library will serve as the City’s main branch and be nearly three times the size of its 18 Area Schools & Local Universities predecessor. Along with our state of the art facilities, public safety has always been a top priority with City 20 City Government Administration. Because of this, Pico Rivera is one of the safest cities in Southern California. 22 Pico Rivera At A Glance We hope this guide will help residents new and old, discover the City of Pico Rivera and the many 24 Trash Collection and Recycling resources and programs that are offered here in the City.
    [Show full text]