DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Fragment of Proclus' Abstract of the Epic Cycle Contained in the Codex Venetus of the Iliad Author(S): D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Fragment of Proclus' Abstract of the Epic Cycle Contained in the Codex Venetus of the Iliad Author(S): D On the Fragment of Proclus' Abstract of the Epic Cycle Contained in the Codex Venetus of the Iliad Author(s): D. B. Monro Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 4 (1883), pp. 305-334 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/623376 . Accessed: 06/04/2014 23:01 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 72.186.217.31 on Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:01:02 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ON THE FRAGMENTOF PROCLUS'ABSTRACT. 305 ON THE FRAGMENT OF PROCLUS' ABSTRACT OF THE EPIC CYCLE CONTAINED IN THE CODEX VENETUS OF THE ILIAD. THE document which is the subject of the following paper has the interest of being the only copy of the only direct record of a whole period of Greek literature-the period, namely, of the poets who carried on the traditions of Homeric art in the eighth and seventh centuries B.C. It is a fragment in a double sense: first because it is a mere extract, and secondly because the pages on which it is preserved are themselves in a fragmen- tary condition. It professes to be derived from a certain kind of primer or rdsumd of Xpqo-rop'dOeta Greek literature-theypap•lar'LKc-a work of a grammarian named Proclus; and contains, with other matter, part of his account of the so-called 'Epic Cycle.' Regarding Proclus himself nothing is certain, except that he is not Proclus Diadochus, the. Platonic philosopher of the fifth century. According to Welcker's probable conjecture, he is to be identified with Eutychius Proclus of Sicca, instructor of the emperor M. Antoninus. Of the context from which this precious fragment is taken we fortunately possess a short account in the Bibliotheca of the patriarch Photius (of the ninth century); who had before him, not indeed the original work -few grammatical treatises had the good fortune to survive in their integrity-but extracts (cKXoryal), of which our document was part. According to Photius (Cod. 239) the work of Proclus was divided into four books. His extracts included :- (1) Short biographies of the five great epic poets-Homer, Hesiod, Pisander, Panyasis, and Antimachus. (2) An account of the so-called Epic Cycle. (3) A discussion of the authorship of the poem called Cypria. This content downloaded from 72.186.217.31 on Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:01:02 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 306 ON THE FRAGMENT OF PROCLUS' ABSTRACT The Epic Cycle is described as beginning with the primeval embrace of Heaven and Earth, from which the Giants and Cyclopes were born, and giving a complete mythical history. It was made up from different poets, and (o-vprXqpodtevo4) ended with the death of Ulysses at the hands of his son Tele- gonus. The poems of the Epic Cycle, it is added, were preserved and valued not so much for their merit, as for the sequence of the events related in them. Thus far Photius, summarising what he had read in Proclus. Of the 'chrestomathy' of Proclus itself we have- (1) A short life of Homer, preserved in the Codex Venetus of the Iliad, and elsewhere. (2) An abstract or argument of the Trojan part of the Epic Cycle, specifying the poems of which it was made up. These, if the surviving text is so far complete,were eight in number, viz. : Cypria (authorship disputed), Iliad, Aithiopis, by Arctinus of Miletus, Little Iliad, by Lesches of Mitylene, Sack of Ilium ('IXlov 7r6pacn),by Arctinus,1 Nostoi, by Agias of Troezen, Odyssey, Telegonia, by Eugammon of Cyrene. This abstract is preserved in two fragments. The portion relating to the Cypria is found in four MSS., none of them of high antiquity. The rest is in the Codex Venetus of the Iliad, a manuscript of the tenth century. These several portions of the work of Proclus answer so well to the description in Photius as to leave no doubt that they are part of the 'extracts' which he had before him. They are less complete than the collection known to Photius, inasmuch as they do not contain any abstract or account of the earlier part 1 In Mr. Mahaffy's very readable not see any ground for this departure History of Greek Literature this poem from the usual account. If Arctinus' is mentioned, but it is stated that ' the Sack of Ilium did not enter into the arrangers of the mythical cycle pre- Epic Cycle, how did an abstract of it ferred, on the Sack of Troy, a poem of come to be given by Proclus ? Lesches called the Little Iliad.' I do This content downloaded from 72.186.217.31 on Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:01:02 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions OF THE EPIC CYCLE. 307 of the Epic Cycle. They also omit the lives of the other Epic poets-Hesiod, &c. Whether they represent the whole of the Trojan part of the Epic Cycle is the question to which we have now to turn. The celebrated Codex Venetus of the Iliad (Marc. 451), which has preserved in its scholia nearly all that is known of the most ancient criticism of Homer, originally contained a good deal of matter drawn from the chrestomathy of Proclus; in particular the life of Homer, and the abstract of the Epic Cycle, or part of it. This was prefixed to the text and scholia, serving as a kind of introduction to the volume. Unfortunately the leaves on which it was written no longer exist in a complete state. The fragments consist of one entire sheet or pair of leaves, and three detached leaves; in all, five leaves. The rest ' of the MS. consists of' quaternions or gatherings of four sheets each, and the presumption is that the introductory matter occupied one such gathering. Thus three leaves of the original eight are missing. The single leaves have been attached to fresh parchment, and some new leaves are bound up with them, so that there are now eleven leaves before the text of the Iliad begins. The five old leaves are numbered 1, 4, 6, 8, 9: of these folio 1 and folio 8, form an entire sheet, the rest being single. Their contents are as follows:- Folio 1. Life of Homer, from Proclus. 4. Abstract of of the a ,, part Epic Cycle (viz., few lines of the conclusion of a Sack of Ilium, then the Nostoi, Odyssey,and Telegonia), from Proclus. 6. Abstract of another of the ,, part Epic Cycle, viz., the Iliad, AXthiopis,Little Iliad, and Sack of Ilium (by Arctinus): from the second book of the chrestomathy of Proclus. 8. The latter of a treatise on the critical marks ,, part of the Alexandrians. 9. Filled with much later than the MS. ,, paintings, The corresponding abstract of the Cypria, which is preserved elsewhere, is exactly long enough to fill one leaf of the Venetian manuscript. Hence we may infer with tolerable certainty, This content downloaded from 72.186.217.31 on Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:01:02 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 308 ON THE FRAGMENT OF PROCLUS' ABSTRACT as Studemund pointed out, that this abstract was contained on one of the lost leaves. The problem now is to determine the places which the surviving leaves held in the original quaternion. It is certain, in the first place, that folio 1 and folio 8 formed the outermost sheet (first and last leaf) of the quire. Except on this arrangement it would be impossible to place the three leaves containing the abstracts, and also the lost leaf containing the earlier part of the treatise which ends on folio 8. Again, it is clear that folio 4 must come after folio 6; for folio 4 gives the last part of the whole Epic Cycle, while folio 6 belongs to an earlier part of the story, and immediately follows the lost folio which gave the Cypria. It remains to consider whether folio 4 followed immediately after folio 6, or was separated from it by a portion of text now lost. The latter alternative has been recently maintained with great learning and ingenuity by Prof. A. Michaelis first in his edition of Jahn's GriechischeBilderchroniken (p. 93 ff.), and again in the Hermes (xiv. p. 481 ff.). His chief argument may be stated somewhat as follows:- The contents of folio 4 begin with a few lines describing the last events of the sack of Troy, as follows: 'Ulysses having slain Astyanax, Neoptolemus receives Andromache as his prize. They divide the rest of the spoil: Demophon and Acamas find YEthra,and take her with them. Then having set Troy on fire, they sacrifice Polyxena at the tomb of Achilles.' Again, the last part of folio 6 is occupied by the abstract of Arctinus' Sack of Ilium. If then, folio 4 originally followed folio 6, it is necessary to consider these first lines of folio 4 to represent the conclusion of that poem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Eponymous) Heroes
    is is a version of an electronic document, part of the series, Dēmos: Clas- sical Athenian Democracy, a publicationpublication ofof e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org]. e electronic version of this article off ers contextual information intended to make the study of Athenian democracy more accessible to a wide audience. Please visit the site at http:// www.stoa.org/projects/demos/home. Athenian Political Art from the fi h and fourth centuries: Images of Tribal (Eponymous) Heroes S e Cleisthenic reforms of /, which fi rmly established democracy at Ath- ens, imposed a new division of Attica into ten tribes, each of which consti- tuted a new political and military unit, but included citizens from each of the three geographical regions of Attica – the city, the coast, and the inland. En- rollment in a tribe (according to heredity) was a manda- tory prerequisite for citizenship. As usual in ancient Athenian aff airs, politics and reli- gion came hand in hand and, a er due consultation with Apollo’s oracle at Delphi, each new tribe was assigned to a particular hero a er whom the tribe was named; the ten Amy C. Smith, “Athenian Political Art from the Fi h and Fourth Centuries : Images of Tribal (Eponymous) Heroes,” in C. Blackwell, ed., Dēmos: Classical Athenian Democracy (A.(A. MahoneyMahoney andand R.R. Scaife,Scaife, edd.,edd., e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org], . © , A.C. Smith. tribal heroes are thus known as the eponymous (or name giving) heroes. T : Aristotle indicates that each hero already received worship by the time of the Cleisthenic reforms, although little evi- dence as to the nature of the worship of each hero is now known (Aristot.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hermeneutical Profile of the Hypomnemata
    CHAPTER 9 A Hermeneutical Profile of the Hypomnemata This chapter offers a hermeneutical profile of the hypomnemata. This profile is based on the exegetical resources as they were defined in the previous chapter. As we shall see, the notion of Homer as a conscious, individual author and teacher governs interpretations of the Iliad in the hypomnemata. The resourc- es the hypomnema exegetes apply to derive meaning from their base text tie in with this overarching perspective. 1 Perspectivisation The hypomnema commentators approached the Homeric epics as the works of a single, conscious author and teacher by the name of Homer. For these exegetes, “Homer” referred not just to a collection of literary compositions,1 but to a single, conscious author, who had a name, a biography, and a style.2 Homer not merely composed, but also wrote down the Iliad and the Odyssey.3 1 The extent of Homer’s literary production was discussed in antiquity. Aristotle, for instance, famously attributed the Margites to Homer. Others attributed the Homeric Hymns, or even poetry in general, to Homer. See Rudolf Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the Hellenistic Age (Oxford: Clarendon, 1968), 73–74; Alexander Beecroft, Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China: Patterns of Literary Circulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 61–105. 2 See Dirk M. Schenkeveld, “Aristarchus and ΟΜΗΡΟΣ ΦΙΛΟΤΕΧΝΟΣ: Some Fundamental Ideas of Aristarchus on Homer as a Poet,” Mnemosyne 23 (1970): 162–78; Gregory Nagy, “Early Greek Views of Poets and Poetry,” in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. George A.
    [Show full text]
  • Collins Magic in the Ancient Greek World.Pdf
    9781405132381_1_pre.qxd 30/10/2007 12:09 Page i Magic in the Ancient Greek World 9781405132381_1_pre.qxd 30/10/2007 12:09 Page ii Blackwell Ancient Religions Ancient religious practice and belief are at once fascinating and alien for twenty-first-century readers. There was no Bible, no creed, no fixed set of beliefs. Rather, ancient religion was characterized by extraordinary diversity in belief and ritual. This distance means that modern readers need a guide to ancient religious experience. Written by experts, the books in this series provide accessible introductions to this central aspect of the ancient world. Published Magic in the Ancient Greek World Derek Collins Religion in the Roman Empire James B. Rives Ancient Greek Religion Jon D. Mikalson Forthcoming Religion of the Roman Republic Christopher McDonough and Lora Holland Death, Burial and the Afterlife in Ancient Egypt Steven Snape Ancient Greek Divination Sarah Iles Johnston 9781405132381_1_pre.qxd 30/10/2007 12:09 Page iii Magic in the Ancient Greek World Derek Collins 9781405132381_1_pre.qxd 30/10/2007 12:09 Page iv © 2008 by Derek Collins blackwell publishing 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Derek Collins to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Knights 1056 and Little Iliad F2
    “Even a woman could carry”: Knights 1056 and Little Iliad F2 In their contest for the love of Demos, Paphlagon boasts of capturing hundreds of Spartan “ravenfish” (at Pylos) and the Sausage Seller replies, καί κε γυνὴ φέροι. That cryptic line goes unanswered and we would not guess its significance were it not for the scholia: it comes from the “Judgment of Arms” in the Little Iliad. On the advice of Nestor, the Achaeans sent out scouts to listen in on the Trojans, thus to discover which of the two contenders for Achilles’ legacy was the more deserving. They overheard two girls arguing over that very issue: one praised Ajax for rescuing the body of Achilles and (at Athena’s prompting) the other responded with the insult: Odysseus fought off the Trojans as Ajax made off with the body, and even a woman could carry a burden if she doesn’t have to fight for it. This version of the Judgment seems, as Martin West described it, “the silliest and most far-fetched,” assuming “[t]he second girl’s aphorism ... is decisive for the award of the arms to Odysseus” (2013: 176). But that way of deciding the issue would also be absurd to the ancient audience. This paper offers a new reconstruction of the episode in line with the workings of archaic justice. In Odyssey 11.547, Odysseus recalls that παῖδες Τρώων “gave judgment” in his favor; the scholiast on that line says it was athetized by Aristarchos as an interpolation from the epic cycle, and scholars have often supposed that it is essentially the same tale that figures in Little Iliad.
    [Show full text]
  • How Archaeologists Found the Lost City of Troy
    How archaeologists found the lost city of Troy This doomed city at the heart of the Trojan War was lost for thousands of years until a team of German archaeologists uncovered the ancient site. HEINRICH SCHLIEMANN, THE German archaeologist, was in Turkey in the late 19th century on an eccentric quest. He was excavating a tell—an artificial mound that covers long abandoned settlements. The site, known as Hisarlik, was familiar to only a few specialists. But as Schliemann dug, he was pinning his hopes on finding the ruins of the most famous city in classical literature: Troy. PHOTOGRAPH BY EOSGIS . C O M The trouble was that Troy might not even have existed. The acclaimed Greek poet Homer popularized the Trojans and their city in The Iliad and The Odyssey, the 8th-century B.C. epic poems. These works told the story of a 10-year war between Greece and Troy, fought by such timeless characters as the kings Priam and Agamemnon, the warriors brave Hector and mighty Achilles, and the survivors crafty Odysseus and loyal Aeneas. The poems tell of bloody battles, fantastic adventures, heroic deeds, and tragic consequences. But was Troy a real place? Schliemann set out to prove it was. (Homer's Iliad contains timeless lessons of war.) And he did. Hisarlik is now widely accepted as the setting for Homer’s epic tales. Studies have revealed that the 100-foot-high mound contains not just one, but nine Troys, each built over the ruins of the one before. Today archaeologists consider Troy VI—the sixth counting from the bottom up—to be the likeliest candidate for Homer’s Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Hopkins's Homer: a Scholarly Edition of Gerard Manley
    ABSTRACT Hopkins’s Homer: A Scholarly Edition of Gerard Manley Hopkins’s Dublin Notes on the Iliad Melinda Creech, Ph.D. Mentor: Joshua King, Ph.D. In a letter to his mother (13 January 1886), Gerard Manley Hopkins mentioned that he was “taking notes for one [a book] on Homer’s art.”(CW II 757). These notes on the Iliad, made while Hopkins was living in Dublin, on sixty-five pages of folded sheets of paper, are housed at Campion Hall, Oxford. In the Campion Hall manuscript, Hopkins makes this final statement: “After this I am going to make my notes mainly on my interleaved book. Feb. 12 ’86.” Those additional fifteen pages, interleaved into his copy of Homeri Ilias (1883), are housed at the Foley Library, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington. Taken together, the two sets of notes, consisting of 514 items and pertaining to fifty- seven pages in his edition of the Iliad, were written between November 1884 and ca. February 1886. A transcription of Hopkins’s notes, those housed at Campion Hall, and those housed at Gonzaga University, and a commentary on those notes comprises the bulk of the dissertation. These Dublin Notes on the Iliad, written by Hopkins during one of the darkest times of his life, when he was estranged from his country, his family, and his beloved Wales, provide a unique insight into the way he regarded the art of Homer’s poetry—the way Homer ordered the words, phrases, and lines that contributed to that poetry; the way that “stock” epithets were not stock at all, but expressed nuanced characteristics of the things and people they modified; the value Homer placed on the inscape of words, fitting each word into its place in the lines of dactylic hexameter—and the way Hopkins reflected his study of Homer in his own poetry, particularly the poetry he wrote and revised while living in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Theopompus' Homer
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Classics 2020 Theopompus’ Homer: Paraepic in Old and Middle Comedy Matthew C. Farmer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/classics_facpubs THEOPOMPUS’ HOMER: PARAEPIC IN OLD AND MIDDLE COMEDY MATTHEW C. FARMER T IS A STRIKING FACT that, out of the twenty titles preserved for the late fifth- and early fourth-century comic poet Theopompus, three directly reference I Homer’s Odyssey: Odysseus, Penelope, and Sirens. In one fragment (F 34) preserved without title but probably belonging to one of these plays, Odysseus himself is the speaking character; he quotes the text of the Odyssey, approv- ingly.1 Another fragment (F 31), evidently drawn from a comedy with a more contemporary focus, mocks a politician in a run of Homeric hexameters. Theo- pompus was, it seems, a comic poet with a strong interest in paraepic comedy, that is, in comedy that generates its humor by parodying, quoting, or referring to Homeric epic poetry. In composing paraepic comedy, Theopompus was operating within a long tra- dition. Among the earliest known Homeric parodies, Hipponax provides our first certain example, a fragment in which the poet invokes the muse and deploys Homeric language to mock a glutton (F 128). The Margites, a poem composed in a mixture of hexameters and trimeters recounting the story of a certain fool in marked Homeric language, may have been composed as early as the seventh cen- tury BCE, but was certainly known in Athens by the fifth or fourth.2 In the late
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Hesiod Homer and Homerica
    COLLECTION OF HESIOD HOMER AND HOMERICA Hesiod, The Homeric Hymns, and Homerica This file contains translations of the following works: Hesiod: "Works and Days", "The Theogony", fragments of "The Catalogues of Women and the Eoiae", "The Shield of Heracles" (attributed to Hesiod), and fragments of various works attributed to Hesiod. Homer: "The Homeric Hymns", "The Epigrams of Homer" (both attributed to Homer). Various: Fragments of the Epic Cycle (parts of which are sometimes attributed to Homer), fragments of other epic poems attributed to Homer, "The Battle of Frogs and Mice", and "The Contest of Homer and Hesiod". This file contains only that portion of the book in English; Greek texts are excluded. Where Greek characters appear in the original English text, transcription in CAPITALS is substituted. PREPARER'S NOTE: In order to make this file more accessable to the average computer user, the preparer has found it necessary to re-arrange some of the material. The preparer takes full responsibility for his choice of arrangement. A few endnotes have been added by the preparer, and some additions have been supplied to the original endnotes of Mr. Evelyn-White's. Where this occurs I have noted the addition with my initials "DBK". Some endnotes, particularly those concerning textual variations in the ancient Greek text, are here ommitted. PREFACE This volume contains practically all that remains of the post- Homeric and pre-academic epic poetry. I have for the most part formed my own text. In the case of Hesiod I have been able to use independent collations of several MSS. by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Edition with Commentary of the Batrachomyomachia
    An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford Matthew Hosty St John’s College Michaelmas Term 2013 ii CONTENTS Abstract v Acknowledgements vii Note on abbreviations ix Introduction 1 I. Date and Authorship 1 II. Parody and Pastiche 23 III. Frogs and Mice 36 IV. Language and Style 51 V. Reception and Influence 82 VI. Text and Transmission 96 Text and apparatus criticus 117 Note on the apparatus 117 ΒΑΤΡΑΧΟΜΥΟΜΑΧΙΑ 119 Deleted lines 131 Translation 135 Commentary 145 Bibliography 357 Appendix A: images 367 Appendix B: lines omitted and retained in the principal MSS 369 iii iv An edition with commentary of the Batrachomyomachia Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Matthew Hosty, St John’s College, Oxford Michaelmas Term 2013 ABSTRACT The thesis consists of three main sections: the Introduction, the text (with apparatus), and the Commentary. The Introduction begins with a survey of the available evidence for the poem’s date and authorship, before moving on to consider its generic affiliations and influences, focusing on two particular areas: its links with the ill-defined genre of παρῳδία, and its relationship to animal-narratives elsewhere in ancient literature (particularly fable) and visual art. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the poem’s style and metre, a brief tour of its Nachleben up to the 13th century, and a summary of the notoriously tangled manuscript tradition. The text is new, and differs substantially from both that of Allen (in the OCT) and of West (the most recent English edition).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Companion to the Greek Epic Cycle
    Histos 10 (2016) cxvi–cxxiii REVIEW A NEW COMPANION TO THE GREEK EPIC CYCLE Marco Fantuzzi and Christos Tsagalis, edd., The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception: A Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. xiii + 678. Hardback, $195.00. ISBN 978-1-107-01259-2. nough and too much has been written about the Epic Cycle’, wrote T. W. Allen in 1908, but more recent scholarship has not been dis- ‘E suaded from tackling the subject afresh. We now have three editions of the fragments and testimonia, by Bernabé, Davies, and West; the short but useful survey by Davies (1989) was followed by a more ambitious and heretical analysis by Burgess (2001); West has produced a commentary on the Trojan epics (with valuable prolegomena which look more widely), and Davies a typ- ically learned one on the less well-attested Theban series. But all these contri- butions are dwarfed by the book under review, containing a substantial intro- duction and thirty-two essays which occupy well over 600 pages, with a forty- five-page bibliography.1 This is not a volume in the Cambridge Companion series, but more advanced and in grander format.2 It is full of useful material, though inevitably there is a lot of repetition and despite its scale it cannot be regarded as comprehensive. Nevertheless, there is much food for thought. The book falls into three parts. Part I consists of ten general essays (‘Ap- proaches to the Epic Cycle’); part II contains eleven specific studies (one on ‘Theogony and Titanomachy’, plus an essay on each of the attested Theban and Trojan epics); part III deals with ancient reception, mostly in specific genres or authors.
    [Show full text]
  • IDH 2930 Syllabus Homeric Hymns and Homeric Kenneth Silverman 12
    !1 IDH 2930 - (Un)Common Read (section 3419) The Homeric Hymns and Homerica: The Other Works of “Homer” meets Monday, Period 10 (5:10-6:00 pm) in Hume 011. Instructor: Kenneth Silverman e-mail: [email protected] office hours: 1:45- 2:45 pm, Monday (or, by appointment), Dauer Hall 125E Classics Department phone: (352) 392-2075 Textbooks: Diane J. Rayor, trans. The Homeric Hymns: A Translation, with Introduction and Notes. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014 [2004]). (ISBN-13: 978-0520282117) (required) Note on editions: you may also use the older edition of this same book, published in 2004. The page numbers are identical. All other required readings, outside of Rayor 2014, will be provided on the Canvas course site. Course description: Many undergraduate students will have read at least parts of the Iliad and the Odyssey, either in high school or college courses; or, otherwise, they will be familiar with these stories from movies and TV shows (such as Troy [2004], or a recent Netflix series, Troy: Fall of a City). They will be less likely to know the Homeric Hymns and “Homerica”– shorter works that at different points in antiquity and the Middle Ages were attributed to Homer, or at least were grouped in the same corpus with the Iliad and Odyssey. Yet these “minor” poems can be equally, if not more, informative about ancient Greek society than Homer’s major epics. As many of them were composed for religious occasions, they offer invaluable evidence for the use of music in ancient cult, as well as the ritual aspects of myth and storytelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Tragedy and the Epic Cycle: Narrative Tradition, Texts, Fragments
    GREEK TRAGEDY AND THE EPIC CYCLE: NARRATIVE TRADITION, TEXTS, FRAGMENTS By Daniel Dooley A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October 2017 © Daniel Dooley All Rights Reserved Abstract This dissertation analyzes the pervasive influence of the Epic Cycle, a set of Greek poems that sought collectively to narrate all the major events of the Trojan War, upon Greek tragedy, primarily those tragedies that were produced in the fifth century B.C. This influence is most clearly discernible in the high proportion of tragedies by Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides that tell stories relating to the Trojan War and do so in ways that reveal the tragedians’ engagement with non-Homeric epic. An introduction lays out the sources, argues that the earlier literary tradition in the form of specific texts played a major role in shaping the compositions of the tragedians, and distinguishes the nature of the relationship between tragedy and the Epic Cycle from the ways in which tragedy made use of the Homeric epics. There follow three chapters each dedicated to a different poem of the Trojan Cycle: the Cypria, which communicated to Euripides and others the cosmic origins of the war and offered the greatest variety of episodes; the Little Iliad, which highlighted Odysseus’ career as a military strategist and found special favor with Sophocles; and the Telegony, which completed the Cycle by describing the peculiar circumstances of Odysseus’ death, attributed to an even more bizarre cause in preserved verses by Aeschylus. These case studies are taken to be representative of Greek tragedy’s reception of the Epic Cycle as a whole; while the other Trojan epics (the Aethiopis, Iliupersis, and Nostoi) are not treated comprehensively, they enter into the discussion at various points.
    [Show full text]