DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving the Integration of Building Design and Facilities Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IMPROVING THE INTEGRATION OF BUILDING DESIGN AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Habib BU JAWDEH School of the Built Environment College of Science & Technology University of Salford, Salford, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, March 2013 Table of Contents Page List of Tables .......................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................ vii List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. x Abstract .................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1 | INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Research Problem ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 Establishing the Research Questions ......................................................... 6 1.3 Research Aims and Objectives .................................................................. 8 1.4 Uniqueness and Relevance of the Research ............................................. 9 1.5 Research Limitations ................................................................................ 10 1.6 Thesis Organisation ................................................................................. 11 1.7 Ethical Considerations .............................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 2 | LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................. 15 2.1 Facilities Management ............................................................................. 17 2.1.1 History and Definition ......................................................................... 17 2.1.2 Role and Responsibilities .................................................................. 19 2.1.3 Components ...................................................................................... 21 2.1.4 Present and Future Development ...................................................... 26 2.2 Building Design ........................................................................................ 29 2.2.1 History ............................................................................................... 29 2.2.2 Objectives .......................................................................................... 33 2.2.3 Disciplines ......................................................................................... 38 2.2.4 Markets .............................................................................................. 40 2.2.5 Stages ............................................................................................... 41 2.2.6 The Design Front End ........................................................................ 47 2.2.7 Design Quality and the Designer’s Performance ............................... 48 2.3 Client Requirements ................................................................................. 49 2.3.1 Requirements Management .............................................................. 51 2.3.2 Design Brief ....................................................................................... 53 2.3.3 Processing Client Requirements ........................................................ 56 2.3.4 Achieving Client Satisfaction ............................................................. 58 2.4 Design-related FM Knowledge: FM Requirements ................................... 59 2.4.1 Measuring Facility Performance and Customer Satisfaction ............. 60 2.4.1.1 Facility Evaluation Tools ................................................................. 60 2.4.1.2 Performance Measurement ............................................................ 65 2.4.1.3 Client and User Satisfaction Assessment ....................................... 66 2.4.1.4 Benefits of Conducting Evaluation Exercises ................................. 67 2.4.1.5 The Role of FM in Performing Facility Evaluation ........................... 69 2.4.1.6 POEs Considered a Low FM Priority .............................................. 71 2.4.1.7 Linking Post-Occupancy to Design ................................................. 72 2.4.2 Identifying FM Requirements ............................................................. 75 i 2.4.2.1 Client and User Satisfaction ........................................................... 76 2.4.2.2 Operation and Maintenance ........................................................... 79 2.4.2.3 Space Layout and Flexibility ........................................................... 83 2.4.2.4 Sustainability................................................................................... 86 2.4.2.5 Energy Efficiency ............................................................................ 91 2.4.2.6 Ergonomics ..................................................................................... 93 2.4.3 An Example on FM-altered Design .................................................... 95 2.5 FM and Design Integration ....................................................................... 96 2.5.1 Studies on Integration ........................................................................ 96 2.5.2 Knowledge Management ................................................................. 102 2.5.3 Knowledge Transfer for Achieving Integration ................................. 104 2.5.3.1 The Knowledge Transfer Process ................................................. 106 2.5.3.2 Factors Affecting Transfer ............................................................ 107 2.5.3.3 Competent Facilities Management: “The Sender” ........................ 108 2.5.3.4 Knowledge Pull: Designers as “The Receivers” ............................ 109 2.5.4 Factors Affecting FM and Design Integration ................................... 113 2.5.4.1 Design Side .................................................................................. 113 2.5.4.2 Facilities Management Side .......................................................... 114 2.5.5 Consequences of Limited Integration .............................................. 116 2.5.6 Purposes for the Integration of FM and Design ............................... 117 2.5.6.1 Resolving Complexity in Projects .................................................. 117 2.5.6.2 Addressing FM Concerns ............................................................. 117 2.5.6.3 Ensuring Proper Client and User Involvement .............................. 119 2.6 Previous Contributions to the Knowledge ............................................... 122 2.6.1 FM and User Participation in Design ............................................... 122 2.6.2 Participating in Brief Preparation ..................................................... 124 2.6.3 Enriching Facility Programming ....................................................... 127 2.6.4 Considering Usability Issues ............................................................ 128 2.6.5 Combining Facilities Management and Project Management .......... 129 2.6.6 Process Design ................................................................................ 130 2.6.7 Soft Landings ................................................................................... 131 2.6.8 Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) ..................................................... 132 2.6.9 Performance-Based Design ............................................................. 132 2.6.10 Construction Process Protocol Model .............................................. 135 2.7 Summary ................................................................................................ 136 CHAPTER 3 | RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................... 138 3.1 Facility Design and Management Research ........................................... 139 3.2 An Overview of Research in Education .................................................. 140 3.2.1 Approaches to Research ................................................................. 141 3.2.2 Qualitative versus Quantitative Data ................................................ 144 3.2.3 Research Design ............................................................................. 145 3.3 Research Methodology .......................................................................... 146 3.3.1 Assumptions Correlated with Social Science Research .................. 146 3.3.2 Types of Research Methods ............................................................ 149 ii 3.3.2.1 Surveys ......................................................................................... 149 3.3.2.2 Experiments, Quasi-experiments and Single-case Research ....... 150 3.3.2.3 Case Studies ................................................................................ 151 3.3.2.4 Correlational Research ................................................................. 152 3.3.2.5 Action Research ........................................................................... 152 3.3.3 Choosing a Suitable Methodology ................................................... 153 3.3.3.1 Survey Research Type and Design .............................................
Recommended publications
  • Building Design GUIDELINES Table of Contents

    Building Design GUIDELINES Table of Contents

    Building Design GUIDELINES Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 1 Part I. Introduction Background . 2 Goals . 3 Applicability of This Document . 3 Part II. Building Design Guidelines A Context Fit. 5 B Pedestrian Friendliness. 8 C Visual Attractiveness . 18 D Sustainable Design . 32 Appendix I. Public Input Process . 36 II. Design Review Procedure . 40 III. Design Guidelines Checklist . 42 IV. Façade Renovation Toolkit . 43 Acknowledgements The Building Design Guidelines for the City of Naperville, Illinois were prepared through the help of many citizens, staff and officials of the Naperville community who participated in the planning process at stakeholder meetings, on-line surveys and open house meetings. Their involvement and insights are sincerely appreciated. City Plan Commission Derke Price, Chairman Bill Jepson Mike Brown Joe McElroy Ann Edmonds Jeffrey Meyers Paul Hinterlong Reynold Sterlin City Council George Pradel, Mayor Jim Boyajian Kenn Miller Bob Fieseler John Rosanova Richard Furstenau Darlene Senger Doug Krause Grant Wehrli City Staff Allison Laff, AICP, Planning Services Team Leader - TED Business Group Ying Liu, AICP, Community Planner - TED Business Group Suzanne Thorsen, Community Planner - TED Business Group Prepared by the City of Naperville with assistance from Lohan Anderson, LLC and A Design Consulting. 1 INTRODUCTION Background From just a handful of families residing within the City Council adopted Resolution #05-020 that states: original settlement, Naperville has grown to a community of over 140,000 people and is now a dynamic city with “It is the City of Naperville’s vision and expectation both old-fashioned charm and a high-tech corporate that issues related to design and architecture, corridor.
  • Shaping New Knowledges

    Shaping New Knowledges

    PAPER ABSTRACT BOOK SHAPINGSHAPING NEWNEW KNOWLEDGESKNOWLEDGES ROBERT CORSER SHARON HAAR 2016 ACSA 104TH ANNUAL MEETING Shaping New Knowledges CO-CHAIRS Robert Corser, University of Washington Sharon Haar, University of Michigan HOST SCHOOLS University of Washington Copyright © 2016 Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Inc., except where otherwise restricted. All rights reserved. No material may be reproduced without permission of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture 1735 New York Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 www.acsa-arch.org 2 – 2016 ACSA 104th Annual Meeting Abstract Book CONTENTS THURSDAY, MARCH 17 FRIDAY, MARCH 18 SATURDAY, MARCH 19 2:00PM - 3:30PM 11:00AM - 12:30PM 9:00AM - 10:30AM 05 Acting Out: The Politics and Practices of 15 Divergent Modes of Engagement: 31 Beginnings in the Context of New Interventions: Session 1 Exploring the Spectrum of Collaborative Knowledge Mireille Roddier, U. Michigan and Participatory Practices: Session 1 Catherine Wetzel, IIT Caryn Brause, U. Massachusetts, Amherst James Sullivan, Louisiana State U. 06 Architecture is Philosophy: Beyond the Joseph Krupczynski, U. Massachusetts, Post-Critical: Session 1 Amherst 32 Open: Hoarding, Updating, Drafting: Mark Thorsby, Lone Star College The Production of Knowledge in Thomas Forget, U. N. Carolina @ Charlotte 16 Knowledge Fields: Between Architecture Architectural History and Landscape: Session 1 Sarah Stevens, U. of British Columbia Cathryn Dwyre, Pratt Institute 07 Open: Challenging Materiality: Industry Chris Perry, RPI Collaborations Reshaping Design 33 Water, Water Everywhere…: Session 1 Julie Larsen, Syracuse U. Jori A. Erdman, Louisiana State U. Roger Hubeli, Syracuse U. 17 Knowledge in the Public Interest Nadia M.
  • What Knowledge Is of Most Worth in Engineering Design Education?

    What Knowledge Is of Most Worth in Engineering Design Education?

    Integrated Design: What Knowledge is of Most Worth in Engineering Design Education? Richard Devon Sven Bilén 213 Hammond 213 Hammond Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania State University PA 16802 PA 16802 [email protected] sbilé[email protected] Alison McKay Alan de Pennington Dep’t. of Mechanical Engineering Dep’t. of Mechanical Engineering University of Leeds University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Leeds LS2 9JT, UK [email protected] [email protected] Patrick Serrafero Javier Sánchez Sierra Ecole Centrale de Lyon Esc. Sup. de Ingenieros de Tecnun 17 Chemin du Petit Bois Universidad de Navarra F-69130 Lyon-Ecully, France 20018 San Sebastián, Spain [email protected] [email protected] Abstract This paper is based on the premise that the design ideas and methods that cut across most fields of engineering, herein called integrated design, have grown rapidly in the last two or three decades and that integrated design now has the status of cumulative knowledge. This is old news for many, but a rather limited approach to teaching design knowledge is still common in the United States and perhaps elsewhere. In many engineering departments in the United States, students are only required to have a motivational and experiential introductory design course that is followed several years later by an experiential and discipline-specific capstone course [1]. Some limitations of the capstone approach, such as too little and too late, have been noted [2]. In some departments, and for some students, another experiential design course may be taken as an elective. A few non-design courses have an experiential design project added following a design across the curriculum approach.
  • Budgen, Software Design Methods

    Budgen, Software Design Methods

    David Budgen The Loyal Opposition Software Design Methods: Life Belt or Leg Iron? o software design methods have a correctly means “study of method.”) To address, but future? In introducing the January- not necessarily answer, this question, I’ll first consider D February 1998 issue of IEEE Software,Al what designing involves in a wider context, then com- Davis spoke of the hazards implicit in pare this with what we do, and finally consider what “method abuse,”manifested by a desire this might imply for the future. to “play safe.”(If things go well, you can take the credit, but if they go wrong, the organization’s choice of method can take the blame.) As Davis argues, such a THE DESIGN PROCESS policy will almost certainly lead to our becoming builders of what he terms “cookie-cutter, low-risk, low- Developing solutions to problems is a distinguish- payoff, mediocre systems.” ing human activity that occurs in many spheres of life. The issue I’ll explore in this column is slightly dif- So, although the properties of software-based systems ferent, although it’s also concerned with the problems offer some specific problems to the designer (such as that the use of design methods can present. It can be software’s invisibility and its mix of static and dynamic expressed as a question: Will the adoption of a design properties), as individual design characteristics, these method help the software development process (the properties are by no means unique. Indeed, while “life belt” role), or is there significant risk that its use largely ignored by software engineers, the study of the will lead to suboptimum solutions (the “leg iron”role)? nature of design activities has long been established Robert L.
  • Selection of Logistics Company in Facility Management Sector with Topsis and Electre from Multi-Size Decision Making Methods

    Selection of Logistics Company in Facility Management Sector with Topsis and Electre from Multi-Size Decision Making Methods

    IJBTS International Journal of Business Tourism and Applied Sciences Vol.7 No.1 January-June 2019 SELECTION OF LOGISTICS COMPANY IN FACILITY MANAGEMENT SECTOR WITH TOPSIS AND ELECTRE FROM MULTI-SIZE DECISION MAKING METHODS Ali Fuat Guneri, Omer Yildiz Yildiz Technical University, Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul, TURKEY [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT In this study, it is discussed selection of a logistics company for a firm operating in the facility management sector and aimed to make contribution to Facility Management Sector with scientific methods which has gained importance in recent years in Turkey. Since many qualitative and quantitative criteria must be taken into account to make a correct and reliab le selection of logistics company, multi-criteria decision making techniques TOPSIS and ELECTRE have been implemented in an integrated way. 9 different criteria have been taken into account to be able to choose among 5 companies to present the solution method of the decision problem. Criteria regarding to the problem are weighted by competent people from different sectors working with logistics companies. Optimal company selection with TOPSIS method is provided, order of preference is determined and with the ELECTRE method, both the results were confirmed and the companies were ranked according to their superiority. Keywords—Electre, Facility Management, TOPSIS I. INTRODUCTION Companies that move with the motive of survival in competitive markets are obliged to have zero errors in order to ensure that every step they take is correct and effective. Customer satisfaction is strayed from the departments which are in contact with the customers and appeared in every aspect of production and service.
  • Investigation of Facilities Management Practices for Providing Feedback During the Design Development and Review Stages Fadi A

    Investigation of Facilities Management Practices for Providing Feedback During the Design Development and Review Stages Fadi A

    International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation Investigation of facilities management practices for providing feedback during the design development and review stages Fadi A. Fatayer, Mohammad A. Hassanain, Abdullatif Abdallah, Abdul-Mohsen Al-Hammad, Article information: To cite this document: Fadi A. Fatayer, Mohammad A. Hassanain, Abdullatif Abdallah, Abdul-Mohsen Al-Hammad, (2019) "Investigation of facilities management practices for providing feedback during the design development and review stages", International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-05-2018-0040 Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-05-2018-0040 Downloaded on: 02 March 2019, At: 01:22 (PT) References: this document contains references to 48 other documents. To copy this document: [email protected] Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald- srm:467320 [] For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for Downloaded by AN-NAJAH UNIVERSITY At 01:22 02 March 2019 (PT) digital archive preservation.
  • Design for an Unknown Future: Amplified Roles for Collaboration, New Design Knowledge, and Creativity Stephanie Wilson, Lisa Zamberlan

    Design for an Unknown Future: Amplified Roles for Collaboration, New Design Knowledge, and Creativity Stephanie Wilson, Lisa Zamberlan

    Design for an Unknown Future: Amplified Roles for Collaboration, New Design Knowledge, and Creativity Stephanie Wilson, Lisa Zamberlan Introduction The field of design has expanded significantly in recent years. In Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/desi/article-pdf/31/2/3/1715404/desi_a_00318.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 addition to engaging in the design of artifacts, designers are apply- ing their skills in a wide range of areas that include organizational design, service design, strategic design, interaction design, and design for social innovation. The rapid development of these areas is, in part, propelled by a broad recognition of design thinking and practice as a significant driver of innovation. This recognition is reflected in the establishment of government-funded design labs, such as MindLab in Denmark and Helsinki Design Lab in Finland. The potential of design to transform the public sector has also recently been recognized in Australia through the development of the Centre for Excellence in Public Service Design. Although recent research has identified new and emerging roles for design and the designer in the twenty-first century, a num- ber of areas remain underexplored in the literature. This article examines several of these areas, including the designer’s role as co- creator in collaborative and interdisciplinary teams, as well as the designer’s role in generating new design knowledge and in devel- oping and contributing to cultures of creativity. Examples from practice are used to illuminate the growing importance of these roles in design and for designers as they navigate the complexity of today’s design challenges.
  • A Review on Current Status of Facility Management Practices in Building

    A Review on Current Status of Facility Management Practices in Building

    Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 10 - 14, 2020 A Review on Current Status of Facility Management Practices in Building Industry and Prospective BIM Intervention to Manage the Facilities Effectively during its Service Life Abdulaziz Aldowayan, Fikri T. Dweiri Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management University of Sharjah Sharjah, UAE [email protected],[email protected] Senthilkumar Venkatachalam Construction Engineering and Management Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad Kerala, Palakkad , India [email protected] Abstract BMS are deployed to manage buildings such as Shopping malls, office, and residential complexes. However, the information needed for their efficient functioning are either incomplete, generated separately, or hard to determine. BIM generates and stores useful integrated information during design and construction phases of the building projects. These Information are well utilized during design and construction stages but their usage in FM stage is limited. The guidelines and standards to facilitate BIM model during design and construction stages, are not considered critically usable. Hence, this paper aims to identify the need for crucial asset information during FM practices while executing the BMS process, to develop a standard framework for information specifications during the early development of BIM model, and utilize the same as a source for BMS in FM processes. Nevertheless, this paper addresses the common FM practices and its building data requirements towards efficient BMS implementation pivotal to the mechanical and electrical systems for a conceptual framework of a BIM model. The research adopts deductive approach through semi- structured qualitative interviews with FM stakeholders of the malls in Saudi Arabia to obtain the standard FM data requirement from client perspective, while managing the FM process through a BMS system.
  • Read the Report

    Read the Report

    Relating Facility Performance Indicators with Organizational Sustainability Performance in Public Higher Education Facilities A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Gregory K. Adams In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Building Construction and Integrated Facility Management in the College of Architecture Georgia Institute of Technology May 2010 Copyright 2010 by Gregory K. Adams Relating Accepted Facility Performance Indicators with Organizational Sustainability Performance in Georgia Public Higher Education Facilities Approved by: Professor Kathy Roper, Advisor College of Architecture Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Daniel Castro-Lacouture College of Architecture Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Linda Thomas-Mobley College of Architecture Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: March 19, 2010 This work is dedicated to the memory of my father, Edward S. “Jack” Adams, the smartest man I ever knew not to have received a college education who, more than any other, inspired and taught me to think critically, and to my mother, Arah E. Adams, whose love and support for me is as fresh today as the day she brought me to this world all these fifty-four years ago. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my wife, Maria Guadalupe Alonzo Adams, who made innumerable sacrifices so that I could complete this work, and my sons, Jack and Gary, who have supported their father in the pursuit of his education at the expense of time that would have otherwise been spent with them. My employer, the University System of Georgia, is to be commended for providing employees such as me the opportunity to perform this kind of research, and for supporting them through it.
  • 1 CLOTHING and ARCHITECTURE: More in Common

    1 CLOTHING and ARCHITECTURE: More in Common

    CLOTHING AND ARCHITECTURE: more in common Han Xu 20107500 1 Clothing and buildings are becoming even more alike. Both have typically served the bodies that inhabit them by maintaining environmental control and by presenting a codified exterior to the world. But now there are new kinds of physical resemblances between architecture and clothing. Various kinds of textiles and weaves are now being exploited in landscape and building design. Vast landscapes are shaped by geotexiles while building structures and envelopes exploit tensile, textile strategies, enabled by new lighter and more flexible materials and by the assistance of digital simulations. As well as becoming lighter, buildings are also becoming increasingly more temporary. The lifespans of buildings are ever shorter as their inhabitants become more transient, moving frequently from city to city. Evidence of this nomadic lifestyle can be found in fashion. Clothing, the portable envelope worn on the body, now provides some of the functions formerly associated with architecture. Designers are exploring the possibilities of integrated lights in clothes, pockets to carry portable electronic devices as well as soft electronic devices that are embedded in technical fabrics. Through other technological advances in textiles, specialized suits offer climatic control in very extreme environments. Yet other designers are integrating structure into clothing or even reviving the primitive model of a portable textile shelter. Many designers switch between fashion and architecture. Even the manufacturing processes for clothing and architecture can now be very much alike as new, highly sophisticated weaving robots automize the manufacturing process for articles of fashion or for components of buildings. In Gottfried Semper’s 1860 Style in the Technical and Tectonic Arts, we find a creation myth for today’s textile buildings and architectural suits.
  • Using BIM Technology to Optimize the Traditional Interior Design Work Mode

    Using BIM Technology to Optimize the Traditional Interior Design Work Mode

    E3S Web of Conferences 38, 03026 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183803026 ICEMEE 2018 Using BIM Technology to Optimize the Traditional Interior Design Work Mode Ning Ke ZHU Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, 100044, China Abstract: the development of BIM technology and application in the field of architecture design has produced results, but BIM technology and application in the field of interior design is still immaturity because of construction and decoration engineering separation. The article analyzes the problems that BIM technology lead to the interior design work mode optimization, from the 3D visualization work environment, real-time collaborative design mode, physical analysis design mode, information integration design mode state the application in interior design. free designer from tedious drawing works, it help budget company work more accurate, it help construction 1. Introduction organization work more precise and greatly improve the The Building Information Modeling technique first project progress, it help the operation management appeared in the United States. The concept of BIM people manage and maintain the whole life cycle of undergo nearly 30 years. in 1975, Dr Charlie Eastman , construction more convenient and accurate. Carnegie Mellon University initiated the "Building the In the design stage, The application of BIM Description System" (architecture Description System) technology is aimed at architectural design mainly. working prototype, in 1984, the Hungarian Graphisoft Several major design software, such as Autodesk Revit, company researched and developed architectural design Bentley, ArchiCAD, etc, have a lot of information software named AtchiCAD, in 1986, Robert Ash in building block libraries which is easy to adjust GMW company proposed "Building Modeling" architecture building information modelling by means of conception, the definition of Building Information Model parametric design model, and they have effectively has been updated and improved.
  • Experiences and Insights from Use of a Design-Build Process in Founding a New Campus

    Experiences and Insights from Use of a Design-Build Process in Founding a New Campus

    Experiences and Insights from Use of a Design-Build Process in Founding a New Campus Design-build was the best choice for K-State Olathe because of the flexibility with regard to unknown users and change stakeholder expectations. by Daniel C. Richardson, Lisa C. Freeman, Valerie K. York, Cynthia A. Shuman, and B. Jan Middendorf Introduction Daniel C. Richardson is the CEO of K-State Olathe and is At public research universities, state funding is decreasing responsible for building relationships with industry, developing teaching programs, and recruiting faculty. He was involved in the and budget cuts are now the norm. Establishing a new day-to-day activities associated with the acquisition process of campus may seem impossible under these conditions; K-State Olathe’s International Animal Health and Food Safety Institute. however, Kansas State University (K-State) recently established a new campus in Olathe, Kansas. K-State Lisa C. Freeman formerly served as the associate vice president for innovation at K-State Olathe. She was responsible for building Olathe’s first building, the International Animal Health and public-private partnerships relevant to teaching, research, and Food Safety Institute, a $28 million, 108,000 square foot outreach activities. She was involved in the acquisition process of facility, expands K-State into a three-campus system and K-State Olathe’s International Animal Health and Food Safety Institute. provides the Kansas City region with increased access to Valerie K. York was part of the external evaluation team that the university’s programs. K-State was able to take this documented the acquisition process for K-State Olathe’s significant step during an economic downturn, in part International Animal Health and Food Safety Institute and because of strategic planning with a focus on innovation interviewed key stakeholders about the process.