DOCSLIB.ORG

LANDMARKISM UNDER FIRE a Study of Landmark Baptist Polity On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LANDMARKISM UNDER FIRE a Study of Landmark Baptist Polity On LANDMARKISM UNDER FIRE A Study of Landmark Baptist Polity on Church Constitution by Elder J.C. Settlemoir Copyright 2005 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................... .... i Preface ........................................................................... .... ii Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................ .... 1 Chapter 2 - Old Landmarkism Defined ........................ .... 5 Chapter 3 - J.R. Graves, Old Landmarkism and Church Constitution 16 Chapter 4 - EMDA Defined .......................................... .... 27 Chapter 5 - EMDA and Scripture ................................. .... 35 Chapter 6 - The Mother Church in EMDA ................... .... 47 Chapter 7 - A Challenge Issued .................................... .... 62 Chapter 8 - Baptist Testimony on Church Constitution .... 71 Chapter 9 - Church Manuals ......................................... .... 92 Chapter 10 - Baptist Church Confessions and Church Constitution 102 Chapter 11 - Church Covenants and Church Constitution 112 Chapter 12 - What Actually Constitutes A Church?..... .... 123 Chapter 13 - Landmarkism and Landmarkers Misrepresented 135 Chapter 14 - The Assembly Of Scripture ..................... .... 144 Chapter 15 - Samples of Church Constitution .............. .... 152 Chapter 16 - Conclusion ............................................... .... 168 Appendix I. - Did Graves Change His Position on Church Constitution? 171 Appendix II. - John Gilpin and EMDA ........................ .... 175 Appendix III. - Did Brother Roy Mason Change His Position on Church Constitution? ................................................................. .... 178 Appendix IV. - Did Armitage Write about Emda? ....... .... 181 Appendix V. – “Dyersburg, Tennessee To Jerusalem” .... 185 Appendix VI. - Terms ................................................... .... 194 Appendix VII. - Church Definition by Baptists 203 Appendix VIII. - Objections to Self Constitution 212 PREFACE Several reasons compelled me to prepare this book and to publish it. I mention but three. First, many preachers do not have the time nor the books to do the research necessary to ascertain the facts concerning old Landmarkism and church constitution. It is hoped this book will help supply that need. These facts are now made available so that anyone who wishes to consider this matter for himself will have the references made ready. Great numbers of these have been given so that no one can question what the writers quoted believed about church constitution. Most of the books on this subject have misrepresented the old Landmarkers claiming they taught mother daughter authority was essential to constitute a new church. But the old Landmarkers taught self constitution with authority directly from Christ. Because of this misrepresentation their real position is almost unknown. This old Landmark has been moved. This is my attempt to reset it. Secondly, those who believe in self constitution are accused of being anything but Landmarkers. They have been ridiculed and belittled. They are excluded from conferences, fellowships, meetings and churches. I wanted to encourage these men in their stand for the truth of self constitution and to remind them of the Agreat cloud of witnesses@ who embraced this truth in days gone by. I also want to take my stand for God=s truth and with His servants, no matter what the cost. I hope I can say truthfully I desire the whole truth; dare to oppose any error and fear no man. Christ is my Judge! Thirdly, and most important, I believe the Scriptures clearly teach the self constitution of churches. This should suffice for all who believe the Bible. Let me especially thank those brethren who have read this book in whole or in part. Some have made helpful suggestions and corrections without becoming responsible for any errors it may contain. J.C. Settlemoir Sunday, March 20, 2005 This book may be ordered at the address below for $9.00, postage and handling included. J.C. Settlemoir 839 W. US 136 Lizton, IN 46149 [email protected] CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Old Landmarkism has never lacked opponents. The attacks against Landmarkism and those who believe it are relentless.1 While we have learned to expect this from those who are not Landmark we are still a little surprised when these attacks come from Landmark Baptists! And the amazing thing about these assaults is that they are ostensively made in defense of Landmarkism! How is it that Landmark Baptists attack Landmarkism? I fear they do so because they do not know what Landmarkism is! They believe the theory that every Scriptural church must be given authority for constitution from a mother church and that such authority is the essence of Landmarkism and conversely that self constitution is not Landmarkism at all!2 Because of this misconception, they actually direct fire on Landmarkism itself! Landmarkism is under FireB both from those without and from friendly fire! For example. A number of the books (pro and con) on Landmarkism have appeared in recent years.3 Several of these teach the Essential Mother Daughter Authority4 is an integral doctrine of Landmarkism. The advocates of EMDA unite with some opponents of Landmarkism in teaching this idea. The former also maintain this doctrine is revealed in Scripture and confirmed by Baptist History. This book is an attempt to defend old Landmarkism on Church constitution. Old Landmarkism taught the doctrine that every church is self constituted and receives all its authority directly from Christ without any other intermediary. We will set forth the old Landmark position on church constitution and show how EMDA is not only not Landmark, but it is not Baptist and it is not Scriptural! It is my position that EMDA was not taught by a single old Landmarker in the 1800s. This doctrine is not now, and never was, a part of 1 Cf. Patterson. Baptist Succession; Tull. History of SB Landmarkism; Bob Ross. Old Landmarkism and the Baptists; Tom Ross. Resetting an Old Landmark; Milburn Cockrell. Scriptural Church Organization; Robert Ashcraft. Landmarkism Revisited; 7 Questions and Answers as to Church Authority. I.K. Cross. Landmarkism: An Update. Duane Gilliland. Landmarkism. 2For example. Cf. Voice in the Wilderness, June 13, 2002, edited by Bro Mark Minney. On p. 66 the logo is: AWe believe in the >link chain= succession of the Lord=s church....We are Landmark Baptists!@ 2 3 Cf. Patterson. Baptist Succession; Tull. History of SB Landmarkism; Bob Ross. Old Landmarkism and the Baptists; Tom Ross. Resetting an Old Landmark; Milburn Cockrell. Scriptural Church Organization; Robert Ashcraft. Landmarkism Revisited; 7 Questions and Answers as to Church Authority. I.K. Cross. Landmarkism: An Update. Duane Gilliland. Landmarkism. 4 Hereafter EMDA. Essential Mother Daughter Authority. That is, that every church must have the authority of a mother church before it can be constituted, and without this mother church authority no scriptural church can be formed. But the truth is, one church has no more authority to constitute another church, to mother another church or to birth a church than did Pope Leo III to crown Charlemagne as Emperor! This took place on Nov. 24, AD 800 and was the inception of the AHoly Roman Empire@. Will Durant. The Age of Faith, p. 468, 469. old Landmarkism. The early Landmark leaders, and J.R. Graves in particular, not only did not subscribe to EMDA but specifically and consistently taught churches are self constituted being directly authorized to constitute by Christ Himself. It is also my purpose to show that this Landmark principle of Divine church constitution5 is in full agreement with Baptist History. I regret that Bro Cockrell was called home before I could finish this book. He was an able defender of the Faith and was one of the most well-read men among Landmark Baptists. We were good friends. He preached for me and I preached for him. We were in many conferences together. I have never had any ill feelings toward him concerning our differences on EMDA and have none now. I told him the last time I saw him that he was welcome to preach in our church.6 Nor should anyone think that I am now seeking to take advantage of him because he is no longer in this world. It is to his position and to his book to which I respond, not to him personally.7 That I differed with him on this subject is evident. But this does not at all mean that I counted him an enemy. He was a friend of mine and a brother beloved in the Lord. What I have written as to his views, and those of the other men referred to herein, is my effort to set forth the truth as I see it. I have named those to whom I refer so the reader will be able to make a valid judgment of the arguments presented. I have given references throughout so the reader can compare the sources quoted. I have allowed the authors to state their own positions. I do not mean to impute anything to these men which they have not expressed in their own words.8 Yet I have not hesitated to examine their arguments or to check their sources. Bro Cockrell himself used this approach when he differed with any of the brethren. He said: I have just finished writing a book that I did not want to write. You have just read a treatise which was written because I felt it must be done for the good of Christ=s churches. I found it most grievous to have to expose the unsound doctrines of men I love and hold as dear brethren in Christ. I have sought only to admonish them as brethren, not as my enemies .9 In another book of his we have this statement: 5 This is also called ADivine Authority@. 6 He did not say I was welcome to preach for him, however! 7 Cf. J.R. Graves. Old Landmarkism: What is it? Graves said: AI close by assuring the reader that in these pages he will not find one term of >abuse or personality,= @ p. 26. 8 Another Brother, who took the view I oppose in this book, Elder Joe Wilson, has also passed on since I began this book. He too was a friend and a beloved brother in the Lord.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origin, Theology, Transmission, and Recurrent Impact of Landmarkism in the Southern Baptist Convention (1850-2012)
    THE ORIGIN, THEOLOGY, TRANSMISSION, AND RECURRENT IMPACT OF LANDMARKISM IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION (1850-2012) by JAMES HOYLE MAPLES submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject CHURCH HISTORY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: PROF M. H. MOGASHOA March 2014 © University of South Africa ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH DOCTORAL PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Title: THE ORIGIN, THEOLOGY, TRANSMISSION, AND RECURRENT IMPACT OF LANDMARKISM IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION (1850-2012) Name of researcher: James Hoyle Maples Promoter: M. H. Mogashoa, Ph.D. Date Completed: March 2014 Landmarkism was a sectarian view of Baptist church history and practice. It arose in the mid-eighteenth century and was a dominant force in the first half-century of the life of the Southern Baptist Convention, America’s largest Protestant denomination. J. R. Graves was its chief architect, promoter, and apologist. He initiated or helped propagate controversies which shaped Southern Baptist life and practice. His influence spread Landmarkism throughout the Southern Baptist Convention through religious periodicals, books, and educational materials. Key Landmark figures in the seminaries and churches also promoted these views. After over fifty years of significant impact the influence of Landmarkism seemed to diminish eventually fading from sight. Many observers of Southern Baptist life relegated it to a movement of historical interest but no current impact. In an effort to examine this assumption, research was conducted which explored certain theological positions of Graves, other Landmarkers, and sects claimed as the true church by the promoters of Baptist church succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpts from the Color of Compromise Jemar Tisby Chapter
    Excerpts from The Color of Compromise Jemar Tisby Chapter 1 THE COLOR OF COMPROMISE Four young girls busily prepared for their big day. It was September 15, 1963, the day of the “Youth Day” Sunday service at Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, and the girls, along with the other young people of the congregation, would spend the next few hours singing songs, reciting poems, praying, and giving encouraging messages in front of hundreds of beaming parents. The girls— Addie Mae Collins (14), Denise McNair (11), Carole Robertson (14), and Cynthia Wesley (14)—had just finished Sunday school and were in the church basement making final adjustments to their white dresses when the bomb exploded. The blast, which killed all four girls and injured at least twenty others, left a hole in the floor five feet wide and two feet deep. It decapitated Cynthia. Her parents could only identify her body by her feet and by the ring she was wearing. A newspaper report at the time indicated that all of the church’s stained-glass windows had been destroyed except one. That window depicted “Christ leading a group of little children. The face of Christ was blown out.” [* * *] Before the funeral, on the day after the bombing, a young, white lawyer named Charles Morgan Jr. delivered a lunchtime speech at Birmingham’s all-white Young Men’s Business Club. Of course, he had heard about the tragedy in his city, and this lifelong southerner jotted down some words about racism and complicity that would prove to be a turning point in his life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marks of a True Church Jackson Lawson Bi
    The Nature of the Distinction between the Universal and Local Church in the NT: The Marks of a True Church Jackson Lawson Bi 480 Biblical Studies Seminar April 23, 2019 1 Introduction Although many have used the term “true church,” there has been confusion and disagreement over what is required to have a legitimate NT church. Particularly, there is disagreement over whether discipline as a mark of the church is a mark of a true church or simply a mark of a healthy church (or more biblical church). Rolland McCune states that, “Bible- believing Christians would probably agree on all three” marks that followed the reformation (the third being discipline).1 Albert Mohler Jr., in his journal article titled, “Church Discipline: The Missing Mark,” asserts that, “Evangelicals have long recognized discipline as the ‘third mark’ of the authentic church,” citing the Belgic Confession (1561), that includes discipline as a mark of the true church.2 In the end of his article, Mohler quotes John Leadley Dagg as saying, “It has been remarked, that when discipline leaves a church, Christ goes with it.” Mohler follows this quote by saying, “If so, and I fear it is so, Christ has abandoned many churches who are blissfully unaware of His departure.”3 And yet, as we shall see, John Hammett4 and Mark Dever5 disagree: the mark of discipline is not necessarily required in order for there to be a true church. Does Mohler (as well as McCune) confuse what is required for there to be a true church with what is required for a healthy church? Or are Hammett and Dever wrong? I will establish that they both agree in principle.
    [Show full text]
  • James Madison Pendleton
    SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON VOLUME I Historical and Autobiographical JAMES MADISON PENDLETON (1811-1891) SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON IN THREE VOLUMES k Volume I k Historical and Autobiographical • James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology • Reminiscences of a Long Life • The Funeral of Dr. J. M. Pendleton k COMPILED AND EDITED BY THOMAS WHITE Printed in 2006 by THE BAPTIST STANDARD BEARER, INC. No. 1 Iron Oaks Drive Paris, Arkansas 72855 (479) 963-3831 THE WALDENSIAN EMBLEM lux lucet in tenebris “The Light Shineth in the Darkness” ISBN# 1579780466 SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON IN THREE VOLUMES VOLUME ONE — HISTORICAL AND AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL • James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology by THOMAS WHITE • Reminiscences of a Long Life by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON • Article on the Death of J. M. Pendleton by M. M. RILEY VOLUME TWO — ECCLESIASTICAL • Selected Writings on Various Aspects of the New Testament Church by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON VOLUME THREE — THEOLOGICAL • Selected Writings on Various Topics of Theology by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON v TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Historical and Autobiographical k PAGE Acknowledgements . ix Introduction . xi James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology . 1 by Thomas White Reminiscences of a Long Life . 279 by James Madison Pendleton The Funeral of Dr. J. M. Pendleton . 443 by M. M. Riley vii k ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS —————— must extend a thank you to those who made this process I possible. First, I would like to thank Bill Lee and his associates at the Baptist Standard Bearer who agreed to publish this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptist Successionism
    The Journal of Baptist Studies 3 (2009): 3-15. THE SUCCESSIONISM VIEW OF BAPTIST HISTORY * James R. Duvall Introduction When Clarence Walker began publishing The Trail of Blood in 1931, neither he nor J. M. Carroll, the author, could have imagined the impact the booklet would have on Baptists in the United States and around the world. The first thousand copies had been sold quickly by another publisher and sales continued steadily from Ashland Avenue Baptist Church in Lexington, KY. Today there have been nearly three million copies sold. The booklet has been enlarged by the present publisher,1 and it has been translated into several other languages: Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian and possibly others. It is now on the Internet in at least three languages. The Trail of Blood describes in a brief outline form what successionist historians had written for nearly two centuries. They believed there had been a succession of churches that held the basic doctrines of Baptists, and they were not associated in any way with the Roman Catholic institution. The Trail of Blood does not claim to be a complete history as such, but what might be called a “Baptist Manifesto.” It was written in such a way that pastors and teachers could present a thumbnail sketch of their Baptist ancestors. Carroll's idea was so successful that several authors have used a similar format, 2 while other authors have spent a lot of ink seeking to counter these lessons. 3 W. *Thanks to my son, James Kenneth, for assistance in research and preparation of this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology in America
    Theology in America E. BROOKS HOLIFIELD Theology in America CHRISTIAN THOUGHT FROM THE AGE OF THE PURITANS TO THE CIVIL WAR Yale University Press New Haven & London Published with assistance from the Annie Burr Lewis Fund and Emory University. Copyright ∫ 2003 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Sabon type by Keystone Typesetting, Inc. Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, Michigan The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows: Holifield, E. Brooks. Theology in America: Christian thought from the age of the Puritans to the Civil War / E. Brooks Holifield. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-300-09574-0 (alk. paper) 1. Theology, Doctrinal—United States—History. I. Title. bt30.u6h65 2003 230%.0972—dc21 2003042289 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. isbn 0-300-10765-x (pbk. : alk. paper) 109876543 Contents Preface vii 1 Introduction: Theology in America 1 Part 1. Calvinist Origins 2 The New England Calvinists 25 3 Rationalism Resisted 56 4 Nature, the Supernatural, and Virtue 79 5 Jonathan Edwards 102 6 Fragmentation in New England 127 Part 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Moments A
    Furman Magazine Volume 45 Article 4 Issue 1 Spring 2002 4-1-2002 Defining Moments A. V. Huff, Jr. Furman University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarexchange.furman.edu/furman-magazine Recommended Citation Huff, Jr., A. V. (2002) "Defining Moments," Furman Magazine: Vol. 45 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarexchange.furman.edu/furman-magazine/vol45/iss1/4 This Regular Feature is made available online by Journals, part of the Furman University Scholar Exchange (FUSE). It has been accepted for inclusion in Furman Magazine by an authorized FUSE administrator. For terms of use, please refer to the FUSE Institutional Repository Guidelines. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Richard Furman (1755-1825) James C. Furman, son of Richard becomes a leading Baptist minister Furman, is the dominant figure in and envisions an academy that, in university history from 1844 to 1879 time, will "grow into a fully organized and becomes the institution's first college should wise and liberal president in 1859. measures be pursued." Reflections on the people and events that have forged Furman's identity through the university's 175-year history. By A.V. Huff, Jr. 2 Furman closes during the Civil War, although the female college remains open. ROM THE VANTAGE POINT OF 175 YEARS OF FURMAN'S HISTORY, TWO CONCLUSIONS EASILY COME TO MIND. THE PROGRESSIVE VIEW OF THE PAST IS THE MOST COMMON AT CELEBRATORY MOMENTS LIKE THIS. LOOK HOW FAR WE'VE COME, WE MIGHT SAY, FROM THAT LITTLE ACADEMY IN EDGEFIELD. AREN'T WE - AND OUR FOREBEARS - GREAT TO HAVE MADE SO MUCH OUT OF SO LITTLE? THE OTHER CONCLUSION IS A MORE TRAGIC, DETERMINIST VIEW: WE ARE VICTIMS OF OUR HISTORY, NO MORE THAN PAWNS OF FORCES WE CANNOT CONTROL.
    [Show full text]
  • Horn's Creek Baptist Church
    The Early History of Horn’s Creek Baptist Church By Bettis C. Rainsford Historian of the Edgefield County Historical Society Published upon the Occasion of the Initiation of the Restoration of the Church Property April 13, 2014 2014 The Early History of Horn’s Creek Church © Bettis C. Rainsford By: Bettis C. Rainsford Horn’s Creek is a tributary of Stevens Creek in Edgefield County, South Carolina. Its headwaters are near the Pine House and it runs and This publication is dedicated in loving meanders in a westerly and southwesterly direction some sixteen miles to its mouth at Stevens Creek. From its mouth it is approximately seven memory of: miles to the mouth of Stevens Creek where Stevens Creek runs into the Savannah River. Approximately four miles below its headwaters and twelve miles above its mouth, on a ridge on the north side of the creek, stands an ancient church which will soon celebrate the 250th anniversary of its founding. Founded in 1768, Horn’s Creek Church soon became the center of religious activity for a sparsely-populated area that stretched for nearly ten miles in every direction. It was one of two churches in the region, both of which had been founded by the “New Light” or “Separate” or “Irregular” Baptist movement which was a part of the “Great Awakening” of the mid- eighteenth century. When President George Washington passed through this county on his Southern Tour in 1791, the Church had already been serving the religious needs of the people for nearly a quarter of a century. In the decades following its founding, the population of the Horn’s Creek neighborhood grew rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • VOICES from the PAST; VOICES for the PEW: History of Support of the Direct Linkage Between Trustees and the SBC Churches
    Journal for Baptist Theology and Ministry Vol. 2 No. 1 (Spring 2004): 6-21 VOICES FROM THE PAST; VOICES FOR THE PEW: History of Support of the Direct Linkage Between Trustees and the SBC Churches Ergun Mehmet Caner Associate Professor of Theology and Church History Liberty University 1971 University Blvd. Lynchburg, VA 24502 Outsiders often assume that the president of the Southern Baptist Convention sits at the top of a denominational hierarchy, supervises a vast denominational bureaucracy, and directs the work of the Convention by a command-and-control system of authority. This is a natural assumption, for this would be the case in hierarchical systems of denominational polity. But the Southern Baptist Convention is not a hierarchical system, and no individual sits at the top of a denominational flowchart.1 In his forward to the author’s book on the lives of the fifty-two Southern Baptist Convention presidents, Dr. R. Albert Mohler adroitly notes the clear distinction of polity between the Free Church movement, in which Southern Baptists are found, and all other forms of external and internal ecclesiastical authority. We have no ruler. We have no owner. We are a voluntary cooperation of local churches, which have the singular authority to maintain their autonomy. As shall be seen, the trustee system was a systematic and conscious choice by Southern Baptist forefathers to maintain explicitly the direct linkage between the institutions we own and the local churches. As shall be further noted, any violation of the direct linkage between trustees and churches is a direct violation of Southern Baptist’s historical stance on polity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Baptist Convention “Crisis” in Context: Southern Baptist Conservatism and the Rise of the Religious Right
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School Spring 2017 The outheS rn Baptist Convention “Crisis” in Context: Southern Baptist Conservatism and the Rise of the Religious Right Austin R. Biggs Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Christianity Commons, Cultural History Commons, History of Religion Commons, and the New Religious Movements Commons Recommended Citation Biggs, Austin R., "The outheS rn Baptist Convention “Crisis” in Context: Southern Baptist Conservatism and the Rise of the Religious Right" (2017). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 1967. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1967 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION “CRISIS” IN CONTEXT: SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONSERVATISM AND THE RISE OF THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Austin R. Biggs May 2017 THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION “CRISIS” IN CONTEXT: SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONSERVATISM AND THE RISE OF THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT Dean, Graduate School Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are several people who, without their assistance and support, this project would not have been possible. I would first like to thank my thesis committee. I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Tamara Van Dyken. It was in her History of Religion in America course that I stumbled across this topic and she has provided me with vital guidance and support from the very beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Landmarkism What Is It?
    Old Landmarkism What is It? James R. Graves PREFACE The origin of the appellation "Old Landmarkism"--Its present strength. "Et quorum pars ful."--Virgil, L, 2, 1. 6 My thoughts were first awakened to the subject discussed in this little book in 1832, upon witnessing the immersion of my mother and sister by a Pedobaptist minister, and the plunging of another subject face forward as he knelt in the water, and the pouring water upon another while kneeling in the water, the sprinkling it upon another in the same position, and the sprinkling upon several others while standing on the banks of the stream, and yet others out of a pitcher in the meeting-house. Those different acts for "one baptism" made an indelible impression, and the more so because the administrator seemed to be in ill humor when he immersed, and dipped his hand in water and laid it upon the heads of the candidates he immersed while he repeated the formula! The questions started were: "If he did not believe in immersion, was the act at his hands valid? If--what is not of faith is sin,--could his sin be an act acceptable to God?" Twenty-two years after, that mother applied to the 2d Church in Nashville, of which I was pastor, for membership upon her immersion, which brought the whole matter up afresh as a practical question for serious examination. Being quite young and this my first pastorate, I referred the whole matter an d responsibility to Bro. Howell, then pastor of the 1st Church, telling him that I was in serious doubt about the validity of her baptism.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Historical Markers by Time Period
    South Carolina Historical Markers This list of historical markers is divided into the time periods as written in the South Carolina Social Studies Standards. Each time period lists the name of the historical marker, organized alphabetically by county. To read the full text of the historical marker, visit the South Carolina Historical Markers database at: http://www.scaet.org/markers/. South Carolina has over 1,400 historical markers, and new markers are added to this list twice a year. Colonial (Precontact-1763): Boonesborough Township (1763) (Abbeville) Broom Hall Plantation (Berkeley) Long Cane Cemetery (Abbeville) Crowfield Plantation (Berkeley) Savannah Town/Fort Moore (Aiken) Early Indian Trading Paths/The Goose Creek Silver Bluff Baptist Church (Aiken) Men (Berkeley) Beaufort (Beaufort) Goose Creek Bridge (Berkeley) Chapel of Ease (Beaufort) The Yamasee War at Goose Creek (1715) Ruins of Old Sheldon/Prince William’s Parish (Berkeley) Church (Beaufort) Berkeley County (Berkeley) Hilton Head (Beaufort) Medway (Berkeley) Pinckney Island (Beaufort) French Huguenot Plantation (Berkeley) St. Helena’s Church (Beaufort) First Land Granted in Calhoun County Area Old Monck’s Corner (Berkeley) (Calhoun) Mulberry Plantation (Berkeley) St. Matthew’s Lutheran Church/Parent Goose Creek Church (Berkeley) Lutheran Church of this Area (Calhoun) Biggin Church (Berkeley) Savany Hunt (Calhoun) Pompion Hill Chapel (Berkeley) Old Wappetaw Church (Charleston) St. Thomas Church (Berkeley) St. Paul’s, Stono/St. Paul’s Churchyard (Charleston) Old Jamestown
    [Show full text]