DOCSLIB.ORG

A Trophic Model for Gulf St Vincent: Balancing Exploitation of Three Fisheries in an EBFM Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Trophic Model for Gulf St Vincent: Balancing Exploitation of Three Fisheries in an EBFM Framework A trophic model for Gulf St Vincent: Balancing exploitation of three fisheries in an EBFM framework Simon D Goldsworthy, Maylene Loo, Anthony Fowler, Michael Steer and Craig Noell April 2017 FRDC Project No. 2013/031 A trophic model for Gulf St Vincent: balancing exploitation of three fisheries ii © 2017 Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and South Australian Research and Development Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-921563-93-5 A trophic model for Gulf St Vincent: Balancing exploitation of three fisheries in an EBFM framework. 2013/031 2017 Ownership of Intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and the South Australian Research and Development Institute. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. This publication (and any information sourced from it) should be attributed to Goldsworthy, S.D., Loo, M., Fowler, A., Steer, M. and Noell, C. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences) 2017, A trophic model for Gulf St Vincent: Balancing exploitation of three fisheries in an EBFM framework. Adelaide, April. Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of this document should be sent to: [email protected] Disclaimer The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. Material presented in these Administrative Reports may later be published in formal peer-reviewed scientific literature. The information, opinions and advice contained in this document may not relate, or be relevant, to a readers particular circumstances. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions expressed by those persons and are not necessarily those of the publisher, research provider or the FRDC. The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation plans, invests in and manages fisheries research and development throughout Australia. It is a statutory authority within the portfolio of the federal Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, jointly funded by the Australian Government and the fishing industry. Researcher Contact Details FRDC Contact Details Name: Simon D. Goldsworthy Address: 25 Geils Court Address: SARD Aquatic Sciences Deakin ACT 2600 2 Hamra Avenue Phone: 02 6285 0400 West Beach SA 5024 Fax: 02 6285 0499 Phone: 08 8207 5325 Email: [email protected] Fax: Web: www.frdc.com.au Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to FRDC publishing this material in its edited form. A trophic model for Gulf St Vincent: balancing exploitation of three fisheries iii Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. iii Tables ...................................................................................................................................................... v Figures ................................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................ vii Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Need .............................................................................................................................................5 1.3 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................5 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Ecopath and mass balance approach ............................................................................................6 2.2 Model area and structure ..............................................................................................................6 2.3 Model fitting ................................................................................................................................7 2.4 Ecosystem indicators ...................................................................................................................8 2.5 Scenario testing ............................................................................................................................8 3 Results................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Trophic structure and flow (Ecopath) ........................................................................................13 3.2 Model fitting (Ecosim) ...............................................................................................................13 3.3 Temporal changes in GSV ecosystem .......................................................................................16 Trends in catch ..........................................................................................................................16 Group biomasses .......................................................................................................................16 Effects of fishing .......................................................................................................................17 3.2 Trophic role of three key species and impact of Snapper ..........................................................25 Diet of three key species ...........................................................................................................25 Predation on three key species ..................................................................................................25 Sensitivity analysis ....................................................................................................................26 Impact of increasing biomass of Snapper on GSV ecosystem ..................................................26 3.3 Optimisation of future ecological and economic performance ..................................................32 Impact of reducing Snapper biomass on high value commercial fisheries and on the GSV ecosystem ..................................................................................................................................32 4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Dynamic management arrangements in the GSV ecosystem ..........................................................37 Trophodynamic indicators of fisheries status and impact ................................................................41 Trophic relationships – role of Snapper in GSV ecosystem ............................................................43 Could a directed fishery for Snapper be used to optimise ecological and economic performance of Blue Crab and prawn fisheries? ..............................................................................45 5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 46 6 Implications ....................................................................................................................................... 47 7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 48 8 Further development .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cabinet Cover Sheet Title Protection of the White
    CABINET COVER SHEET TITLE PROTECTION OF THE WHITE SHARK- REGULATIONS UNDER THE FISHERIES ACT 1982 AND THE NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE ACT 1972 MINISTERS HON DAVID WOTTON MP MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES. HON ROB KERIN MP MINISTER FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES. PURPOSE To provide for the total protection of the white shark and to effect the management of the cage viewing charter industry. RESOURCES REQUIRED No cost implications to government FOR IMPLEMENTATION No effect on government staffing. RELATIONSHIP TO The proposal is consistent with government GOVERNMENT POLICY policy that the State's fisheries resources and habitat are managed on a sustainable basis. CONSULTATION Public consultation took place with the issue of a discussion paper and releases in the media. FAMILY IMPACT STATEMENT Not applicable. 8. URGENCY Not applicable. 9. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that Cabinet approve - 4.1 The drafting of regulations to amend the Fisheries (General) Regulations 1984 as follows - 4.1.1 to proclaim the white shark {Carcharodon carcharias) a protected species under regulation 6, prohibiting the capture, holding or killing of this species; 4.1.2 to amend regulation 35C to: (a) prohibit the use of blood, bone, meat, offal or skin of an animal (other than in a rock lobster pot or fish trap) within two nautical miles of the mainland of the State or all islands and reefs of the State which are exposed at low water mark; and (b) prohibit the depositing of or use of a mammal or any product of a mammal in all marine waters of South Australia; 4.1.3 to prohibit the use of wire trace with a gauge of 2mm or greater, in conjunction with fishing hooks greater than size 12^/0, in all waters of South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Threatenedaustralian Sea-Lion Neophoca Cinerea
    Australian Species ThreatenedAustralian Sea-lion Neophoca cinerea Conservation Status What does it look like? of colony sites is shallow, protected pools in which pups congregate. The waters The Australian Sea-lion is a handsome adjacent to breeding colonies are also pinniped—fin-footed mammal—with a important feeding areas. blunt snout and tightly rolled external ears Unlike other pinnipeds that were with front and hind flippers. Pinnipeds are harvested in Australia during the late 18th, marine mammals, which includes seals, 19th and early 20th centuries, Australian sea-lions and walruses. Sea-lion populations have not yet recovered, Australian Sea-lion males are typically and at some localities there is recent chocolate brown and can reach more evidence of continued population decline. than 2 metres in length and weigh up to Australian Sea-lion Point Labatt. The estimated size of the Australian Sea- Photo by WWF-Canon/John Gibbons 300 kilograms. Females are smaller and lion population is less than 10,000, with their colouring is generally silvery ash-grey 80 per cent occurring in South Australia Commonwealth: Vulnerable above and yellow to cream on their under- and 20 per cent in Western Australia. (Environment Protection and parts. Females can grow to more than Only five of the 73 known breeding sites 1.5 metres in length and weigh up to Biodiversity Conservation for Australian Sea-lions produce more than 80 kilograms. Act 1999) 100 pups each year, representing 57 per cent of all pups born. These sites, all Where is it found? located in South Australia, are Dangerous South Australia: Rare Reef, The Pages Islands, West Waldegrave The Australian Sea-lion is the only (National Parks and Wildlife Island, Seal Bay and Olive Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Victoria Technical Series No
    Deakin Research Online This is the published version: Barton, Jan, Pope, Adam and Howe, Steffan 2012, Marine protected areas of the Flinders and Twofold Shelf bioregions Parks Victoria, Melbourne, Vic. Available from Deakin Research Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30047221 Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner. Copyright: 2012, Parks Victoria. Parks Victoria Technical Paper Series No. 79 Marine Natural Values Study (Vol 2) Marine Protected Areas of the Flinders and Twofold Shelf Bioregions Jan Barton, Adam Pope and Steffan Howe* School of Life & Environmental Sciences Deakin University *Parks Victoria August 2012 Parks Victoria Technical Series No. 79 Flinders and Twofold Shelf Bioregions Marine Natural Values Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Along Victoria’s coastline there are 30 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that have been established to protect the state’s significant marine environmental and cultural values. These MPAs include 13 Marine National Parks (MNPs), 11 Marine Sanctuaries (MSs), 3 Marine and Coastal Parks, 2 Marine Parks, and a Marine Reserve, and together these account for 11.7% of the Victorian marine environment. The highly protected Marine National Park System, which is made up of the MNPs and MSs, covers 5.3% of Victorian waters and was proclaimed in November 2002. This system has been designed to be representative of the diversity of Victoria’s marine environment and aims to conserve and protect ecological processes, habitats, and associated flora and fauna. The Marine National Park System is spread across Victoria’s five marine bioregions with multiple MNPs and MSs in each bioregion, with the exception of Flinders bioregion which has one MNP.
    [Show full text]
  • 080058-89.02.017.Pdf
    t9l .Ig6I pup spu?Fr rr"rl?r1mv qnos raq1oaqt dq panqs tou pus 916I uao^\teq sluauennboJ puu surelqord lusue8suuur 1eneds wq sauo8a uc .fu1mpw snorru,r aql uI luar&(oldua ',uq .(tg6l a;oJareqt puuls1oore8ueltr 0t dpo 1u reted lS sr ur saiuzqc aql s,roqs osIB elqeJ srqt usrmoJ 'urpilsny 'V'S) puels tseSrul geu oq; ur 1sa?re1p4ql aql 3o luetugedeq Z alq?J rrr rtr\oqs su padoldua puu prr"lsr aroqsJJorrprJpnsnv qlnos lsJErel aql ruJ ere,u eldoed ZS9 I feqf pa roqs snsseC srllsll?ls dq r ?olp sp qlr^\ puplsl oorp8ue1 Jo neomg u"rl?Jlsnv eql uo{ sorn8g luereJ lsour ,u1 0g€ t Jo eW T86I ul puu 00S € ,{lel?urxorddu sr uoqelndod '(derd ur '8ur,no:8 7r luosaJd eqJ petec pue uoqcnpord ,a uosurqoU) uoqecrJqndro3 peredard Smeq ,{11uermc '(tg6l )potsa^q roJ perualo Suraq puel$ oql Jo qJnu eru sda,r-rnsaseql3o EFSer pa[elop aqJ &usJ qlvrr pedolaaap fuouoce Surqsg puu Surure; e puu pue uosurqo;) pegoder useq aleq pesn spoporu palles-er su,rr prrqsr eql sreo,{ Eurpeet:ns eq1 re,ro prru s{nser druuruqord aqt pue (puep1 ooreSuqtr rnq 698I uI peuopwqs sE^\ elrs lrrrod seaeell eql SumnJcxa) sprrelsl aroqsJJo u"{e4snv qlnos '998I raqueJeo IIl eprelepv Jo tuaruslDesIeuroJ oqt aql Jo lsou uo palelduor ueeq A\ou aaeq s,{e,rrns aro3aq ,(ueduo3 rr"4u4snv qtnos qtgf 'oAE eqt dq ,{nt p:6o1org sree,{009 6 ol 000 L uea r1aq palulosr ur slors8rry1 u,no1paserd 6rll J?eu salaed 'o?e ;o lrrrod ererrirspuulsr Surura sr 3ql Jo dllJolpu aq; sree,{ paqslqplse peuuurad lE s?a\lueurep1os uuedorng y 009 0I spuplsl dpearg pue uosr"ed pup o8e srea,{ 'seruolocuorJ-"3s rel?l puB
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere Else on Earth
    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Community Monitoring Manual
    Marine Community Monitoring Manual MARINE COMMUNITY MONITORING MANUAL (2ND EDITION) “An early warning system for detecting change in the marine environment” A collaborative project between the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM, Marine Conservation Branch); the Australian Marine Conservation Society, Western Australian Branch (AMCS WA); and the Natural Heritage Trust’s (NHT) Coastwest /Coastcare Programme. Funding provided by Coastwest/ Coastcare. An initiative of NHT (Coastwest/ Coastcare programme) and CALM, Marine Conservation Branch. August 2003 Marine Conservation Branch Department of Conservation and Land Management 47 Henry St. Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160 Updated 12/05/03 Page i Marine Community Monitoring Manual ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Direction: • Dr Chris Simpson – Manager, Marine Conservation Branch (MCB), Nature Conservation Division, CALM. Prepared by: • Karen Wheeler - Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). Marine Community Monitoring Program Steering Committee: • Nick D’Adamo - CALM; • Martin Heller - Natural Heritage Trust (NHT), Coastwest/ Coastcare; • Nick Dunlop - Australian Marine Conservation Society, Western Australian Branch (AMCS WA); and • Tim Grubba, CALM. Funding and Resources: • Funding has been provided by the NHT, via the Coastwest/ Coastcare Programme. • Resources including scientific and technical assistance, administrative assistance and logistical/ operational support has been provided by CALM. Community Participation: • Many sectors of the community have been involved in developing the Marine Community Monitoring Manual since the programme inception in 1999 and a special thank you is extended to all groups involved. Participating groups have been listed separately in the Manual (Please refer to Part IV, section 1.3). Photographs and images: • Cover page: With permission, Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DPI, Perth). Photograph courtesy of Andrew Halsall, Fast Photos Albany.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Sea Lions Neophoca Cinerea at Colonies in South Australia: Distribution and Abundance, 2004 to 2008
    The following supplement accompanies the article Australian sea lions Neophoca cinerea at colonies in South Australia: distribution and abundance, 2004 to 2008 Peter D. Shaughnessy1,*, Simon D. Goldsworthy2, Derek J. Hamer3,5, Brad Page2, Rebecca R. McIntosh4 1South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia 2South Australian Research and Development Institute, PO Box 120, Henley Beach, South Australia 5022, Australia 3Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia 4Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3068, Australia 5Present address: Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia *Email: [email protected] Endangered Species Research 13: 87–98 (2011) Supplement. Information on 26 Neophoca cinerea breeding colonies in South Australia The Australian sea lion Neophoca cinerea is restricted to South Australia and Western Australia. This supplementary material provides information on 26 breeding colonies in South Australia that were visited during this study between 2004 and 2008, with details on pup population estimates from which best estimates are summarized in Table 1 of the main paper. It also summarises data on pup counts available before 2004. Mark-recapture estimates are presented with their 95% confidence limits (CL). Detailed counts of all animals in these colonies have been presented in consultancy reports. Data for the other 13 breeding colonies and 9 haulout sites with occasional pupping (which were not visited in this study) were taken from published literature. In addition, 24 haulout sites of the Australian sea lion visited during the study are listed in Table S1 of this supplementary material, together with their geographical positions and counts of sea lions seen on the dates visited.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of the Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca Cinerea): an Assessment of Novel DNA-Based and Contemporary Methods to Determine Prey Consumption
    Diet of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea): an assessment of novel DNA-based and contemporary methods to determine prey consumption Kristian John Peters BSc (hons), LaTrobe University, Victoria Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Adelaide (October, 2016) 2 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I acknowledge that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Marine Biodiversity in South Australia - Part 1 - Background, Status and Review of Approach to Marine Biodiversity Conservation in South Australia
    Conserving Marine Biodiversity in South Australia - Part 1 - Background, Status and Review of Approach to Marine Biodiversity Conservation in South Australia K S Edyvane May 1999 ISBN 0 7308 5237 7 No 38 The recommendations given in this publication are based on the best available information at the time of writing. The South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) makes no warranty of any kind expressed or implied concerning the use of technology mentioned in this publication. © SARDI. This work is copyright. Apart of any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the publisher. SARDI is a group of the Department of Primary Industries and Resources CONTENTS – PART ONE PAGE CONTENTS NUMBER INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction…………………………………..…………………………………………………………1 1.1 The ‘Unique South’ – Southern Australia’s Temperate Marine Biota…………………………….…….1 1.2 1.2 The Status of Marine Protected Areas in Southern Australia………………………………….4 2 South Australia’s Marine Ecosystems and Biodiversity……………………………………………..9 2.1 Oceans, Gulfs and Estuaries – South Australia’s Oceanographic Environments……………………….9 2.1.1 Productivity…………………………………………………………………………………….9 2.1.2 Estuaries………………………………………………………………………………………..9 2.2 Rocky Cliffs and Gulfs, to Mangrove Shores -South Australia’s Coastal Environments………………………………………………………………13 2.2.1 Offshore Islands………………………………………………………………………………14 2.2.2 Gulf Ecosystems………………………………………………………………………………14 2.2.3 Northern Spencer Gulf………………………………………………………………………...14
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Distributions of Coastal Zooplanktivorous Fishes
    Dynamic distributions of coastal zooplanktivorous fishes Matthew Michael Holland A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science University of New South Wales, Australia November 2020 4/20/2021 GRIS Welcome to the Research Alumni Portal, Matthew Holland! You will be able to download the finalised version of all thesis submissions that were processed in GRIS here. Please ensure to include the completed declaration (from the Declarations tab), your completed Inclusion of Publications Statement (from the Inclusion of Publications Statement tab) in the final version of your thesis that you submit to the Library. Information on how to submit the final copies of your thesis to the Library is available in the completion email sent to you by the GRS. Thesis submission for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Title and Abstract Declarations Inclusion of Publications Statement Corrected Thesis and Responses Thesis Title Dynamic distributions of coastal zooplanktivorous fishes Thesis Abstract Zooplanktivorous fishes are an essential trophic link transferring planktonic production to coastal ecosystems. Reef-associated or pelagic, their fast growth and high abundance are also crucial to supporting fisheries. I examined environmental drivers of their distribution across three levels of scale. Analysis of a decade of citizen science data off eastern Australia revealed that the proportion of community biomass for zooplanktivorous fishes peaked around the transition from sub-tropical to temperate latitudes, while the proportion of herbivores declined. This transition was attributed to high sub-tropical benthic productivity and low temperate planktonic productivity in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Shark Action Plan Policy Report
    Shark Action Plan Policy Report Michelle R Heupel, Peter M Kyne, William T White, Colin A Simpfendorfer Project A11 - Shark action plan 5 December 2018 Milestone 11 – Research Plan v3 (2017) Revised 5 Aug 2019 www.nespmarine.edu.au Enquiries should be addressed to: Michelle Heupel [email protected] Project Leader’s Distribution List Department of the Environment and Energy, Biodiversity Conservation Division Department of the Environment and Energy, Biodiversity Conservation Division Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Darren Cameron Preferred Citation Heupel, M.R., Kyne, P.M., White, W.T. and Simpfendorfer, C.A. (2018). Shark Action Plan Policy Report. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Marine Biodiversity Hub. Australian Institute of Marine Science. Copyright This report is licensed by the University of Tasmania for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence. For licence conditions, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Acknowledgement This work was undertaken for the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP). NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub partners include the University of Tasmania; CSIRO, Geoscience Australia, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Museum Victoria, Charles Darwin University, the University of Western Australia, Integrated Marine Observing System, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW Department of Primary Industries. Important Disclaimer The NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Assessment of Sustainability for Ecological Risk of Shark and Other
    Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett Project No. 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett July 2008 Project Number 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery FRDC Report 2002/033 Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross J. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and Hamlett, W. C. Published by Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research Brand, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225. © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, and Fisheries Victoria. 2008 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners.
    [Show full text]