Aviation Risk Management to Comparative Performance in Air China with American Airlines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aviation Risk Management to Comparative Performance in Air China with American Airlines International Business Research; Vol. 9, No. 2; 2016 ISSN 1913-9004 E-ISSN 1913-9012 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Aviation Risk Management to Comparative Performance in Air China with American Airlines Qussay A. B. Alnuaimi1, 2, Xinping Xia1 & Firas Aziz M. Jawad 1, 3 1 School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, P. B. 430074, P. R. China 2 College of Administration and Economics, University of Diyala, Diyala, Iraq 3 College of Administration and Economics, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq Correspondence: Qussay A. B. Alnuaimi, College of Administration and Economics, University of Diyala, Iraq. E-mail: [email protected] Received: November 25, 2015 Accepted: December 31, 2015 Online Published: January 25, 2016 doi: 10.5539/ibr.v9n2p114 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v9n2p114 Abstract This paper presents a model comparison between the Air China and American Airline. The aim of this study is to research on strong and weak points of these companies on the grounds. Both the countries are from in the continent of Asia and North America and the world. It also concentrates on the domestic and international aviation sector to comparative both Air China and American Airline with political and economic volatility. The sample of SWOT is used to test indexes and to measure volume of strengths and weakness to both the firms. The model represents one of the tools of Aviation Risk Management to evaluate Air China through find all the elements of development and address the weaknesses and shortcomings of the Chinese aviation company in order to compete with the major international airlines. Keywords: ARM comparative, methodology comparative, SWOT comparatives 1. Introduction Given the magnitude level of economic and social backgrounds of China and America, The transport by airlines can partly patterns progress country in different aspects that air companies transport are leading for comprehensive transport access, mobility, and positive impacts as well as the information about networks transport is for understanding and grasping airline companies behaviour and the kind of products and services that they produce to people, tourism and economic. Aviation Risk Management measures operating efficiency for Air China and American Airline as well as identifies the sources of efficiency, inefficiency within each airline So that we conduct a research on comparison between both the two airlines companies. In this aspect Kun and Xingli (2014) wrote last 20 years ago the airlines companies in China had wide growth skills that pushed the country’s rapid expanding economy. In market volume, the number of air ridership grew at an annual average around 15% among 1990 and 2010. In 2005 Chinese Airlines companies had been the world’s second-biggest aviation market, after the United States. Chinese airlines are now between the most earnings airlines in the world. Since 2011 the total profit reached more than (34.1 million RMB) about USD 5 billion representing around 60% of the industry’s global gain. In 2013 the Chinese airlines earnings were twice those of airlines companies in the USA. Laura (2012) adds although one of the joint characteristics between the carriers is the concentrate on operating as a business in level first, the airline conducting the comparison between airlines companies the means of achieving the firm’s goals. Barry and others,(2006) studied comparisons between various different areas of aviation and goals achieved, where he says a lot of airlines in developed countries release regular reports about their achievement in environmental in conjunction with the achievement of the basic goals of competition and achieve growth and maintain market value improvements. In the literature of aircraft companies industry the prime goal is to map the status of environmental reporting by airlines based in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region to identify the major components of the reports and to examine the performance indicators comparisons of the units operating in the Asia-Pacific and the with units in Europe. Winai and others (2013) argued competition and comparative between airlines he said in 1970 Southwest Airlines in USA present the sample commercial low-price carrier has been employed by airlines in much markets as a competitive alternative to the traditional complete-service airline business pattern. On broadly (LPC) supply low-pay air journey services 114 www.ccsenet.org/ibr International Business Research Vol. 9, No. 2; 2016 without providing different (frills) like in-flight hospitality and free meals offered by these airlines. Cristina at al. (2008) add analysis performance by comparative tools to show efficiency of airlines in big market looking at a great model of airlines using different methods of measuring showing efficiency. In this study, we conduct a comparison between two of the largest airlines in the world for the performance and the search for opportunities and minimize the weaknesses to assess what is left in order to compete with international airlines. The residue of the study is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the related literature; Section 3 characterizes the study methodology and the detail of the tests conducted; Section 4 presents the study’s results; and Section 5 summary and conclusions. Results Domestic American Domestic Air china Airline Comparing & evaluating by ARM International International Air American china Figure 1. ARM comparing between Air China and American Airline 2. Literature Review Due to the importance of comparative studies between the different airlines in order to assess performance and achieve the goals we review some of the previous studies and the task carried out by the risk management in this task. McFadden (1996) wrote lately, investigators have begun treat the issue of how surely airline safety data pattern. Although Former studies have discovered pilot-specific factors like driving background, a pilot’s gender, and others using the comparison characteristics between of the company’s sections. Rico and others (2006) studied advantages of allocative efficiency said main advantages of allocative efficiency compared to parametric methods that it does not request any presumption on the functional form of product, results or cost frontiers, and it also does not have to assume that firms always aim to minimize cost. Also does not request any information on prices, which is the most useful in data base for example sensitive industries like airlines. Joyce (2013) application a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method to evaluate the financial performance of local Taiwan airlines based on clusters of financial ratios acquired from logical analysis by measuring volume comparative study in period 2001-2005. Yee (2008) studied on competition and comparison in China’s domestic aviation market airlines firms consecrate large magnitude of resources in provided high services to expand customer satisfaction and increase their income and revenues. In the literature there is a few studies about customer satisfaction regarding to the service quality of the airlines companies. In China aviation market changed in 2000 like carriers competing, ticket prices compete with service quality to gain customer satisfaction. Carlos (2015) used analyses the efficiency and competence of airlines of Africa by Technique for Order Preference by comparison to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This studied of airline has adopted a lot of methods like factor product, econometric border These studies have analyzed airlines from different countries and regions in the world including African Airlines have yet to be fully analyzed for that this research give to airline efficiency by analyzing (TOPSIS). Barros and others (2013) add a lot of cases have been addressed by this method in these regions or countries like US Airlines, Canadian, European and Asian Airlines. Besides efficiency rankings, regulatory measures on the execution and slack comparisons, the impact of network gage or volume was done. Review Jiao et al. (2015) for competition and comparison they said In 1970, US has been Deregulation and in other Anglo Saxon economies that means best quality airline services, achieve lower air fares and big competition with the airlines of China have widely grown and tremendously in 1980 and expanded the ridership size from 10.3 billion person-km to 499 billion person-km, between 1985 and 2012. The rapid growth of passengers is a result of the increase in the numbers of flights, by using big airplanes. Fu and others (2010) add 115 www.ccsenet.org/ibr International Business Research Vol. 9, No. 2; 2016 China’s Airlines have market power nationally, internationally, more than mature airlines in the USA and the Europe where liberalization began the latter two have a much more extensive international network of routes, more market power, financial resources and the larger fleets. China wishes to create national champions competing and comparing with internationally. On the other hand Fu (2012) wrote on the comparison of income between Chinese Airlines with the US and Europe Airlines confirmed this paper by illustrative diagrams to Chinese airline the top of the US and Europe domestic airline flight Unlike the US and Europe Airline they achieve income profit more than international flights. In the same context Zhang (2009) study, confirmed that there are some limitations still exist in China’s aviation industry and some airlines are still owned by the state unlike European and American Airlines, but at the same time, Chinese airlines has significant growth rates, which helps to the prosperity and development in this industry. The study of Rogers (1997), adopted the style of the comparison between American Airlines and Air China to preserve the environment and the methods used for this purpose. The results obtained from this study affirmed the obligation of environmental standards developed by the United Nations, to maintain the integrity of the environment of air in both the countries and neighboring countries to leave the environment through high levels of pollution and illustrations emphasize this fact, which was used in this study.
Recommended publications
  • Airline On-Time Arrival Performance (Sep 2018, by Variflight) SC Tops
    Airline On-time Arrival Performance (Sep 2018, by VariFlight) SC Tops China’s Major Airlines in APAC OTP Chart MF Shows the Most Rapid YoY Growth Powered by VariFlight incomparable aviation database, the monthly report of Airline On-time Arrival Performance provides an overview of how global airlines perform in September, 2018. In September, Aeroflot-Russian Airlines tops the global OTP chart again. A total of 381,000 aircraft movements were handled by Chinese airlines, showing an increase of 4.6 percent year-over-year. Aeroflot-Russian Airlines takes the top spot in the global OTP chart for three consecutive months. Shandong Airlines moves into the first place for punctuality among Chinese airlines in APAC with an on-time arrival rate of 89.22 percent. Among ten major Chinese airlines, Shandong Airlines surpasses Tianjin Airlines to top the OTP list; Xiamen Airlines shows the most rapid YoY growth in OTP. Taking a look at the TOP10 domestic popular routes, SHA-CAN route demonstrates the fastest growth, improving 23.14 percent compared with that in August. Global Big Airlines SU Tops Global Big Airlines Aeroflot-Russian Airlines tops the global big airlines chart in September with an on-time arrival rate of 96.28 percent and 5.06 minutes of average arrival delay, followed by All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines. IATA Flight On-time Arrival Average Arrival Ranking Airlines Country Code Arrivals Performance Delay (minutes) Aeroflot-Russian 1 SU RU 30826 96.28% 5.06 Airlines 2 NH All Nippon Airways JP 34965 96.20% 5.60 3 JL Japan Airlines JP 23778 96.09% 6.58 4 EK Emirates Airlines AE 16042 95.90% 5.68 Page 1 of 6 © 2018 VariFlight.
    [Show full text]
  • RASMAG/21 IP/WP Template
    RASMAG/21−WP26 14-17/06/2016 International Civil Aviation Organization The Twenty-First Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/21) Bangkok, Thailand, 14-17 June 2016 Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in the Asia/Pacific Region CHINA RMA LTHM BURDEN ESTIMATE UPDATE (Presented by China RMA) SUMMARY This paper presents the current expected monitoring burden for the aircraft registered and operated by China and DPR Korea to meet the long term height monitoring requirement. The data were based on the RVSM approval database by the end of March, 2016. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Long Term Height Monitoring Impact Statement developed by RASMAG was endorsed by APANPIRG/20 in September 2009. In RASMAG/11 meeting China RMA provided the burden list to the meeting, and this paper is the update for the data. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 In the last version for the monitoring burden list of China RMA, there were 61 operators with 2608 aircrafts and the biennial monitoring number is about 329. Because of the rapid development for the Chinese Civil Aviation, by the end of March, 2016, there were 77 operators with 2860 aircrafts. 2.2 Every year the monitoring plan of China RMA will be published and sent to the operators every month. The first time of publishing the plan is confirmed at the beginning of each year and it is adjusted in the middle of the year based on the progress. 2.3 Since 2008 China RMA has been using two sets of EGMU to conduct on-board monitoring for Chinese Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Soaring to New Heights in the Greater Bay Area: Opportunities and Market Potentials for the Aviation Industry Content 1
    Soaring to new heights in the Greater Bay Area: Opportunities and market potentials for the aviation industry Content 1. Strengths of the aviation industry in the Greater Bay Area 3 from a macro perspective 2. Optimise airport infrastructures to scale the development of the industry 5 3. Cultivate growth of related industries through marketisation of airlines 9 4. Achieve efficient allocation of aviation resources through a comprehensive 12 transportation system 5. Logistics capacity as a growth enabler for aviation leasing 14 Conclusion 17 Contact us 18 Soaring to new heights in the Greater Bay Area: Opportunities and market potentials for the aviation industry 2 1. Strengths of the aviation industry in the Greater Bay Area from a macro perspective Soaring to new heights in the Greater Bay Area: Opportunities and market potentials for the aviation industry 3 1. Strengths of the aviation industry in the GBA from a macro perspective In February 2019, the Central Committee of the The Greater Bay Area is a hub that integrates Communist Party of China and the State Council manufacturing, technology and financial services – officially published the “Outline Development Plan for incorporating the strategic positioning of the other three the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area”. global Bay Areas. The Guangdong province has been a It stated clearly the national-level strategic plan for major manufacturing cluster since China’s economic developing the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater reform and opening-up, with Dongguan and Foshan Bay Area (hereinafter referred to as Greater Bay Area renowned for being the centre of world-class or GBA for short), with the aim to position it as one of manufacturing “world’s factory” in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • APG IET Interline Partners: LIVE in PROGRESS WAITING FOR
    APG IET Interline partners: LIVE 1. Aeromar, VW 31. Cambodia Angkor Air, K6 61. Precision Air, PW 2. Air Algérie, AH 32. Ceiba Intercontinental, C2 62. Red Wings, WZ 3. Air Astana, KC 33. Cityjet, WX 63. Royal Air Maroc, AT 4. Air Austral, UU 34. Corsair, SS 64. Royal Brunei, BI 5. Air Baltic, BT 35. Egyptair, MS 65. Royal Jordanian, RJ 6. Air Burkina, 2J 36. Ethiopian Airlines, ET 66. Rwandair, WB 7. Air Calin, SB 37. Fiji Airways, FJ 67. SATA Azores Airlines, S4 8. Air Caraïbes, TX 38. Flydubai, FZ 68. Saudi Arabian Airlines, SV 9. Air Corsica, XK 39. Garuda Indonesia, GA 69. SCAT Airlines, DV 10. Air Italy, IG 40. Georgian Airways, A9 70. Shandong Airlines, SC 11. Air Malta, KM 41. Gol Linhas Aereas, G3 71. Sichuan Airlines, 3U 12. Air Moldova, 9U 42. Groupe Transair, R2* 72. Sky Airline, H2 13. Air Namibia, SW 43. Hong Kong Airlines, HX 73. Solomon Airlines, IE 14. Air Panama, 7P* 44. Hong Kong Express, UO 74. Somon Air, SZ 15. Air Senegal, HC 45. InterCaribbean Airways, JY 75. South African Airways, SA 16. Air Seychelles, HM 46. Jeju Air, 7C 76. Taca International, TA 17. Air Tahiti Nui, TN 47. Kam Air, RQ 77. Taca Peru, T0 18. Amaszonas, Z8 48. Kenya Airways, KQ 78. TACV Cabo Verde, VR 19. Amaszonas Uruguay, Z7 49. Lacsa, LR 79. TAG, 5U 20. Asky, KP 50. Lao Airlines, QV 80. TAME, EQ 21. ASL Airlines, 5O 51. Luxair, LG 81. TAROM, RO 22. Atlasglobal, KK 52. Malaysia Airlines, MH 82.
    [Show full text]
  • ACC-AQSM-Annual-Report-2019
    Australia-China Centre for Air Quality Science and Management Annual Report 2019 1. Introduction The ACC-AQSM was launched at the CRAESs in Beijing, in December 2014. Our aim is to provide a platform for joint research to further understanding of the multi-dimensional problem of air pollution at all scales and its impact on human health and the environment, to provide technological and innovative solutions to the problem and continued effective monitoring of pollution sources, and to provide input into national policies that enable informed, efficient and regulated management and control. The Centre operates as a virtual centre based at three offices, the: QUT (QUT), CRAES (CRAES), and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) and manage all research activities under the Centre banner established at each of the partner institutions. The Managing Offices are established to run the day to day activities of the Centre. The ACC-AQSM was launched on Friday December 5, 2014 at Beijing’s Chinese Research Academy for Environmental Sciences (CRAES) 2. The Centre Board The Board provides strategic advice to the Executive Committee on the full range of Centre activities and ensure that the Centre has clear objectives and makes the most effective and efficient use of resources in order to achieve these objectives. The Board consists of two Chairs (the inaugural chairs in Australia: Prof. Ian Mackinnon, QUT; and in China, Professor Jiming Hao, Tsinghua University), a Vice-Chair (Professor Joseph Lee, HKUST). It also includes representatives from some of the partner institutions and relevant stakeholders. Executive Committee The Executive Committee consists of three Directors (the inaugural Directors in Australia: Professor Lidia Morawska, QUT; in China, Professor Fahe Chai, CRAES; in China HK, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mar 2019, by Variflight) SC Tops China's Major Airlines in APAC OTP
    Page 0 of 6 © 2019 VariFlight. All Rights Reserved. Airline On-time Arrival Performance (Mar 2019, by VariFlight) SC Tops China’s Major Airlines in APAC OTP Chart for Three Consecutive Months Powered by VariFlight incomparable aviation database, the monthly report of Airline On-time Arrival Performance provides an overview of how global airlines perform in March, 2019. In March, Korean Air tops the global OTP chart. A total of 395,500 aircraft movements were handled by Chinese airlines, showing an increase of 3.04 percent year-over-year. Korean Air takes the top spot in the global OTP chart with an on-time arrival rate of 97.40 percent. Shandong Airlines and China Express Airlines become the most punctual Chinese large and medium-sized airlines in Asia-Pacific region respectively. Among ten major Chinese airlines, Shandong Airlines tops the OTP list. Compared with last year, Xiamen Airlines shows the most rapid YoY growth of 7.48 percent in OTP. Taking a look at the TOP10 domestic popular routes, KMG-JHG route tops the OTP chart carried by Chengdu Airlines. Global Big Airlines KE Tops Global Big Airlines In March, Korean Air tops the global big airlines chart with an on-time arrival rate of 97.40 percent and 4.10 minutes of average arrival delay, followed by All Nippon Airlines and Garuda Indonesia. IATA Flight On-time Arrival Average Arrival Ranking Airlines Country Code Arrivals Performance Delay (minutes) 1 KE Korean Air KR 12826 97.40% 4.10 2 NH All Nippon Airways JP 29724 97.15% 4.34 3 GA Garuda Indonesia ID 15317 96.25% 4.34 4 JL Japan Airlines JP 25647 95.81% 5.77 5 PC Pegasus Airlines TR 15005 95.27% 5.73 Page 1 of 6 © 2019 VariFlight.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY February 2015 EDITION
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY February 2015 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................ 4 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………..................................................6 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 7 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 8 VI. U.S. CONGRESS ...................................................................................................... 9 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 11 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 13 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 15 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................. 18 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions
    [Show full text]
  • In Line Or out of Order? China's Approach to ADIZ in Theory And
    C O R P O R A T I O N In Line or Out of Order? China’s Approach to ADIZ in Theory and Practice Edmund J. Burke, Astrid Stuth Cevallos For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2055 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9865-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report is based on RAND Project AIR FORCE Strategy and Doctrine Program research that was presented at the second China Aerospace Studies Institute conference, sponsored by Headquarters, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Commercial Flight Schedule
    Semi-commercial flight Schedule Compiled by Department of Consular Affairs | As of 5 January 2021 Route Schedule (local time) ARRIVAL date in Thailand Airline's requirements for travellers No. Airlines Flight No. Starting Date for semi-com Schedule Period Departure Arrival Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun (Please check with airlines' website for the latest info.) 1 Emirates Airlines EK384 DXB-BKK 03.05 12.05 1 ก.ย. daily 25 OCT - 27 MAR 2021 Passengers transiting in Dubai from the countries listed below, must have a negative COVID‑19 PCR test certificate that is valid for 96 hours from the date of test, as well as any requirements for final destination. EK385 HKG-BKK 20.35 22.50 daily 25 OCT - 27 MAR 2021 Afghanistan, Angola, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Chile, Cote d’lvoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Georgia, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Hungary, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Malta, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Senegal, Slovakia, Somaliland, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Zambia, Zimbabwe For more inquiries, please visit https://www.emirates.com/uk/english/help/covid-19/dubai-travel- requirements/tourists/?fbclid=IwAR3HEFVtRcF5FwuD- mYmO9iXSTkDLSzENNd3lxe7XCbdOAC8chzsWiOVMDc 2 Qatar Airways QR830 DOH-BKK 20.40 07.25 (+1) 1 ต.ค. daily 1 SEP - 24 OCT Passengers flying from these countries (Armenia, Bangladesh, Brazil, 20.40 06.35 (+1) daily 25 OCT - 27 MAR 2021 India, Iran, Iraq, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, and Sri QR836 DOH-BKK 03.10 14.10 daily 1 SEP - 24 OCT Lanka) will be required to present a negative COVID-19 test result 02.20 12.40 daily 25 OCT - 27 MAR 2021 carried out and issued within 96 hours prior to their flight departure, unless it is mandated by local authority on departure or at country of arrival to have the test done in a shorter period.
    [Show full text]
  • Capa-Daily-2019-1-June.Pdf
    Content provided by CAPA – Centre for Aviation, ATW and Aviation Daily 75th IATA AGM AND WORLD AIR TRANSPORT SUMMIT ISSUE ONE - 01-JUN-2019 ALEXANDRE de JUNIAC Smarter regulation keeping pace with industry developments SIR TIM CLARK On Asia’s emerging giants GHAITH AL GHAITH Celebrating flydubai’s 10 years of success This CAPA Daily features the topics to be explored at the 75th IATA AGM and World Air Transport Summit. Follow us @CAPA_Aviation CAPA DAILY | 01-JUN 2019 1 Principal Partner: AIRLINE CEOs IN SEOUL CAPA AIRLINE CEOs IN SEOUL 3-4 June 2019, InterContinental Seoul Coex The CAPA Airline CEOs in Seoul Summit is the perfect way to cap your discussions with our industry leaders and conclude your time in Seoul. Final call to register now! Monday 03 June Tuesday 04 June Registration: 16:00 Registration: 08:00 Fireside chat & Twilight Sessions: 16:30 Summit day Sessions: 09:00 CEO Roundtable & Gala Dinner: 19:30 Summit closes: 15:30 Steven John Slattery Christine Kresimir Kucko Stephen Wang Sebastian Mikosz Udvar-Hazy President & CEO Ourmières- CEO Chairman Group Managing Executive Embraer Widener Gulf Air Spring Airlines Director & CEO Chairman CEO Kenya Airways Air Lease Flybe Corporation And many more! TO REGISTER VISIT CEOS19.CAPAEVENTS.COM OR EMAIL AMY YUNG: [email protected] Follow us @CAPA_Aviation CAPA DAILY | 01-JUN 2019 1 75 years of the Chicago Convention - but still no commercial sanity he Chicago Convention is rightly regarded as absolute sovereignty in the airspace above its territory, a watershed in global civil aviation. 75 years this left no multilateral basis for commercial air services on, its resilience and vital role in supporting the to operate across other countries’ national airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline On-Time Arrival Performance (May 2018, by Variflight) SQ Tops
    Airline On-time Arrival Performance (May 2018, by VariFlight) SQ Tops Asia-Pacific Medium-Sized Airlines for Five Consecutive Months Powered by VariFlight incomparable aviation database, the monthly report of Airline On-time Arrival Performance provides an overview of how global airlines are performing in May, 2018. Japan Airlines tops the global big airlines chart with an increase of 0.41 percent compared to April. Among the four largest state-owned Chinese airlines, China Eastern Airlines ranks 1st in mainland China and 8th in Asia-Pacific region. Singapore Airlines has been ranked first among medium-sized airlines in the Asia-Pacific region for five consecutive months. In May, Tianjin Airlines tops the chart among ten major airlines in mainland China, while Shanghai Airlines enjoys the most rapid YoY. Xishuangbanna-Kunming Changshui route run by China West Air ranks first among Top 10 busiest flight routes in mainland China. Global Big Airlines JL Tops Global Big Airlines Japan Airlines tops the global big airlines chart in May with an on-time arrival rate of 97.80 percent increasing by 0.41 percent (compared to April), which surpasses All Nippon Airways. Among the Top10 ranking list, Turkish Airlines is the only airline with over 40,000 flight arrivals. Ranking IATA Airlines Country Flight On-time Arrival Average Arrival Code Arrivals Performance Delay (minutes) 1 JL Japan Airlines JP 25290 97.80% 3.89 2 NH All Nippon Airways JP 37987 97.60% 3.57 3 SU Aeroflot-Russian RU 28763 96.38% 5.12 Airlines 4 QR Qatar Airways QA 14360 96.24% 5.08 5 EK Emirates Airlines AE 15297 95.81% 5.30 6 WS WestJet Airlines CA 22572 95.40% 5.24 7 AM Mexicana Airlines MX 18705 95.31% 5.46 8 VA Virgin Australia AU 13706 95.08% 5.55 9 TK Turkish Airlines TR 40731 94.73% 6.43 Page 1 of 7 © 2018 VariFlight.
    [Show full text]