DOCSLIB.ORG

Conflicts of Interest and Incompatibilities in Eastern Europe Romania, Croatia Moldova

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conflicts of Interest and Incompatibilities in Eastern Europe Romania, Croatia Moldova CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND INCOMPATIBILITIES IN EASTERN EUROPE ROMANIA, MOLDOVA, CROATIA Conflicts of interest and incompatibilities in Eastern Europe CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND INCOMPATIBILITIES IN EASTERN EUROPE ROMANIA, CROATIA, MOLDOVA 1 Romania, Moldova, Croatia Authors Laura tefan, Expert Forum (EFOR), Romania Septimius Pârvu, Expert Forum (EFOR), Romania Munir Podumlijak, Partnership for Social Development, Croatia Cornelia Cozonac, Journalistic Investigations Center, Moldova © 2012 All the information contained within this publication is copyright of the authors and cannot be copied without quotation. You can also download this publication from www.expertforum.ro. 2 Conflicts of interest and incompatibilities in Eastern Europe Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 A comparative view ................................................................................................................................................. 5 ROMANIA I. The formation and evolution of the anticorruption agenda ................................................................ 9 II. Legal framework ............................................................................................................................................... 13 III. Institutional setup ........................................................................................................................................... 16 The structure of the National Integrity Agency ......................................................................................... 18 Monitoring and control ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Legislative evolutions and setbacks ............................................................................................................... 22 Budget ....................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Institutional track-record.................................................................................................................................... 26 Collaboration between institutions ................................................................................................................ 28 IV.Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 MOLDOVA I. The anticorruption agenda ............................................................................................................................ 35 II. Foreign Relations .............................................................................................................................................. 36 III. Conflicts of interests and incompatibilities ........................................................................................... 37 Conflicts of interests ............................................................................................................................................ 37 Incompatibilities .................................................................................................................................................... 42 IV. Enforcement Mechanisms ........................................................................................................................... 44 V. Impact ................................................................................................................................................................... 46 The reaction of civil society ............................................................................................................................... 48 Case studies............................................................................................................................................................. 49 Cases under investigation by the Anti-corruption Prosecutor’s Office ............................................ 52 CROATIA I. The anticorruption agenda - when did it start, who started it and why ....................................... 54 II. The importance of the EU influence (or of other stake-holders) in promoting the anticorruption agenda. Benchmarks / conditionality / access to funds ........................................... 58 III. Where do conflicts of interests and incompatibilities fit in the anticorruption agenda ...... 59 IV. Enforcement mechanisms ........................................................................................................................... 68 V. Case studies and impact of the legal and institutional framework on the prevention and suppression of conflicts of interest and corruption ................................................................................. 76 VI. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................................... 87 3 Romania, Moldova, Croatia Foreword Conflicts of interest and incompatibilities constitute one of the most important challenges to the establishment of rule of law in South East Europe. Successfully tackling these phenomena is a key issue in the relationship between the countries in the region and the European Union. Romania has been an EU member state for six years, Croatia will be admitted in the very near future, and the Republic of Moldova is making progress towards closer ties with the European Union. Therefore, in Bucharest, Zagreb and Chisinau alike, legislation was adopted geared at fighting corruption and at ensuring the integrity of public officials. Yet there is still a gap between legal provisions and the implementation thereof. In this context strong and independent bodies that have the right and the duty to check public officials’ assets and possible incompatibilities are of extreme importance. Romania´s National Integrity Agency has served as an effective watchdog for several years and its work has been continuously praised in the progress reports of the European Commission under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism. ANI can without any exaggeration be called a benchmark institution. In the Republic of Moldova the National Integrity Commission has been set up. So has the Conflict of Interest Commission in Croatia. These institutions are not and will never be “everybody´s darling” In fact they have and will have powerful enemies, also among certain segments of the political elites, who will try to limit the scope of the competencies and actions of these institutions. Therefore, a strong civil society that insists on transparency and accountability, that supports such institutions, is essential in ensuring the durable success of efforts to prevent conflicts of interests and incompatibilities. The present study represents an important contribution in this respect. The authors of each country study provide a realistic picture of the state of play in the fight against corruption in Romania, the Republic of Moldova and Croatia. They offer valuable insights into strengths and weaknesses of institutions and mechanisms employed to combat conflicts of interests and incompatibilities. I therefore sincerely hope that this study will find its way into the cabinets of politicians and experts and that the lessons provided herein will be translated into better policies and track records. Thorsten Geissler Director of the Rule of Law Program South East Europe Konrad Adenauer Stiftung 4 Conflicts of interest and incompatibilities in Eastern Europe A comparative view For many years corruption was not a topic for political action in Romania, Croatia and Moldova. Though opinion polls and international organizations were warning about the importance of this phenomenon, the illegal benefits obtained by people who found themselves in positions of power through corruption blocked for many years all initiatives to address the issue. Things started to change only when countries decided to move towards integration into the European Union thus accepting the standards in terms of rule of law. The first wave of reforms focused on building a comprehensive legal framework to cover the “traditional” forms of corruption – bribery, peddling in influence, abuse in office – and the institutional mechanisms able to enforce this legislation. Romania has set up the National Anticorruption Directorate, a model structure that included prosecutors, police officers and specialists and has investigated and brought to justice tens of parliamentarians, ministers and ex-ministers, mayors and other important public officials. Croatia has established USKOK, a prosecution structure in charge with organized crime and corruption, which is mirrored by a specialized police force and by specialized courts to hear these cases. Moldova has the Anticorruption Prosecutors' Office tasked with investigation of corruption offences. The clear option towards specialization of police officers, prosecutors and judges (only in Croatia) has shown results. Corruption investigations are quite laborious and use extensive work force and resources. As corruption is not an aim in itself, but rather a mechanism to obtain or cover other illegally obtained benefits, corruption investigations often include an organized crime or an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dalmatia Tourist Guide
    Vuk Tvrtko Opa~i}: County of Split and Dalmatia . 4 Tourist Review: Publisher: GRAPHIS d.o.o. Maksimirska 88, Zagreb Tel./faks: (385 1) 2322-975 E-mail: [email protected] Editor-in-Chief: Elizabeta [unde Ivo Babi}: Editorial Committee: Zvonko Ben~i}, Smiljana [unde, Split in Emperor Diocletian's Palace . 6 Marilka Krajnovi}, Silvana Jaku{, fra Gabriel Juri{i}, Ton~i ^ori} Editorial Council: Mili Razovi}, Bo`o Sin~i}, Ivica Kova~evi}, Stjepanka Mar~i}, Ivo Babi}: Davor Glavina The historical heart of Trogir and its Art Director: Elizabeta [unde cathedral . 9 Photography Editor: Goran Morovi} Logo Design: @eljko Kozari} Layout and Proofing: GRAPHIS Language Editor: Marilka Krajnovi} Printed in: Croatian, English, Czech, and Gvido Piasevoli: German Pearls of central Dalmatia . 12 Translators: German – Irena Bad`ek-Zub~i} English – Katarina Bijeli}-Beti Czech – Alen Novosad Tourist Map: Ton~i ^ori} Printed by: Tiskara Mei}, Zagreb Cover page: Hvar Port, by Ivo Pervan Ivna Bu}an: Biblical Garden of Stomorija . 15 Published: annually This Review is sponsored by the Tourist Board of the County of Split and Dalmatia For the Tourist Board: Mili Razovi}, Director Prilaz bra}e Kaliterna 10, 21000 Split Gvido Piasevoli: Tel./faks: (385 21) 490-032, 490-033, 490-036 One flew over the tourists' nest . 18 Web: www.dalmacija.net E-mail: [email protected] We would like to thank to all our associates, tourist boards, hotels, and tourist agencies for cooperation. @eljko Kuluz: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- Fishing and fish stories .
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnalistii 9.Indd
    Jurnaliștii contra corupţ iei9 Chişinău, 2014 CZU 328.185(478)(082)=135.1=161.1 J 93 Pictor: Ion Mîţu Această lucrare este editată cu suportul fi nanciar al Fundaţiei Est-Europene, din mijloacele oferite de Guvernul Suediei şi Ministerul Afacerilor Externe al Danemarcei. Opiniile exprimate în ea aparţin autorilor şi nu refl ectă neapărat poziţia Transparency International – Moldova şi a fi nanţatorilor. Difuzare gratuită Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii Jurnaliştii contra corupţiei: [în Rep. Moldova] / Transparency Intern. Moldova; pictor: Ion Mâţu. – Ch.: Transparency Intern. Moldova, 2014 (Tipogr. “Bons Offi ces” SRL). – ISBN 978-9975-80-108-9 [Partea] a 9-a. – 2014. – 280 p. – Text: lb. rom., rusă. ISBN. 978-9975-80-864-4 800 ex. – 1. Jurnalişti – Corupţie – Republica Moldova – Combatere (rom., rusă). Copyright © Transparency International - Moldova, 2014 Transparency International - Moldova Str. „31 August 1989”, nr. 98, of. 205, Chişinău, Republica Moldova, MD-2004 Tel. (373-22) 203484, e-mail: offi [email protected] www.transparency.md ISBN 978-9975-80-108-9 ISBN 978-9975-80-864-4 Cuprins: Cuvânt înainte .................................................................................................... 6 Copiii satului şi afacerile primarului, Tudor Iaşcenco .................................. 7 Imperiul lui Plahotniuc, Mariana Rață........................................................ 11 Interesele avocatului copilului sau pentru cine lucrează Tamara Plămădeală?, Natalia Porubin ..................................................................... 16 Locuinţe ieftine pentru procurori bogaţi, Olga Ceaglei ..............................21 Localitatea Ghidighici, „afacerea” familiei Begleţ, Lilia Zaharia .............. 25 Сага о недоступе к информации, Руслан Михалевский ........................ 27 Cât l-a costat pe Nichifor luxul de la puşcărie?, Iana Zmeu ....................... 33 Averile şi veniturile ascunse ale procurorului Gherasimenco. „El se temea să nu-l afl e lumea că are casă aşa de mare”, Pavel Păduraru ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Politica 1 2016
    www.ssoar.info Republic of Moldova: the year 2015 in politics Goșu, Armand Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Goșu, A. (2016). Republic of Moldova: the year 2015 in politics. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 16(1), 21-51. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51666-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Republic of Moldova The Year 2015 in Politics ARMAND GO ȘU Nothing will be the same from now on. 2015 is not only a lost, failed year, it is a loop in which Moldova is stuck without hope. It is the year of the “theft of the century”, the defrauding of three banks, the Savings Bank, Unibank, and the Social Bank, a theft totaling one billion dollars, under the benevolent gaze of the National Bank, the Ministry of Finance, the General Prosecutor's Office, the National Anti-Corruption Council, and the Security and Intelligence Service (SIS). 2015 was the year when controversial oligarch Vlad Plakhotniuk became Moldova's international brand, identified by more and more chancelleries as a source of evil 1. But 2015 is also the year of budding hope that civil society is awakening, that the political scene is evolving not only for the worse, but for the better too, that in the public square untarnished personalities would appear, new and charismatic figures around which one could build an alternative to the present political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEZBATERI PARLAMENTARE Parlamentul Republicii Moldova De
    DEZBATERI PARLAMENTARE Parlamentul Republicii Moldova de legislatura a XIX-a SESIUNEA a VII-a ORDINARĂ – SEPTEMBRIE 2013 Ședința din ziua de 26 septembrie 2013 (STENOGRAMA) SUMAR 1. Declararea deschiderii sesiunii de toamnă și a ședinței plenare. Intonarea Imnului de Stat al Republicii Moldova. (Intonarea Imnului de Stat al Republicii Moldova și onorarea Drapelului de Stat al Republicii Moldova.) 2. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Comuniștilor din Republica Moldova – domnul Vladimir Voronin. 3. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Liberal Democrat din Moldova – domnul Valeriu Streleț. 4. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Democrat din Moldova – domnul Dumitru Diacov. 5. Luare de cuvînt din partea Fracțiunii parlamentare a Partidului Liberal – domnul Ion Hadârcă. 6. Dezbateri asupra ordinii de zi și aprobarea ei. 7. Dezbaterea, aprobarea în primă lectură și adoptarea în lectura a doua a proiectului de Lege nr.341 din 15 iulie 2013 pentru ratificarea Convenției Consiliului Europei privind accesul la documentele oficiale. 8. Dezbaterea, aprobarea în primă lectură și adoptarea în lectura a doua a proiectului de Lege nr.343 din 26 iulie 2013 pentru ratificarea Acordului cu privire la colaborarea în domeniul pregătirii specialiștilor subdiviziunilor antiteroriste în instituțiile de învățămînt ale organelor competente ale statelor membre ale Comunității Statelor Independente. 9. Dezbaterea și aprobarea în primă lectură a proiectului Codului transporturilor rutiere. Proiectul nr.267 din 14 iunie 2013. 10. Dezbaterea proiectului de Lege nr.352 din 2 septembrie 2013 cu privire la locuințe. În urma dezbaterilor, s-a luat decizia de a transfera proiectul pînă la pregătirea raportului comisiei.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Croatia by Tena Prelec Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.17 million GNI/capita, PPP: $22,880 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.75 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3 3 3 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 and Independence Corruption 4.5 4.5 4.25 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.71 3.71 3,64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 3.75 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Welcome to the Desert of Transition! Citation for published version: Stiks, I & Horvat, S 2012, 'Welcome to the Desert of Transition! Post-socialism, the European Union and a New Left in the Balkans', Monthly Review, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 38-48. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Monthly Review Publisher Rights Statement: © Stiks, I., & Horvat, S. (2012). Welcome to the Desert of Transition! Post-socialism, the European Union and a New Left in the Balkans. Monthly Review, 63(10), 38-48 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Welcome to the Desert of Transition! Post-socialism, the European Union and a New Left in the Balkans Srećko Horvat and Igor Štiks1 In the shadow of the current political transformations of the Middle East, a wave of protest from Tel Aviv, Madrid to Wall Street, and the ongoing Greek crisis, the post- socialist Balkans has been boiling.
    [Show full text]
  • Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by the Republic of Moldova
    AS/Mon(2012)03 rev 14 March 2012 amondoc03r_2012 or. Engl. Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) Honouring of obligations and commitments by the Republic of Moldova Information note by the co-rapporteurs on their fact-finding visit to Chisinau (28 November – 1 December 2011) 1 Co-rapporteurs: Ms Lise CHRISTOFFERSEN, Norway, Socialist group, and Mr Piotr WACH, Poland, Group of the European People’s Party 1 This information note has been made public by decision of the Monitoring Committee dated 13 March 2012. F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | e-mail: [email protected] | Tel: + 33 3 88 41 2000 | Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733 AS/Mon(2012)03rev I. Introduction 1. After a first visit to Chisinau and Comrat in March 2011 (see doc. AS/Mon (2011) 13 rev), we paid a second fact-finding visit to the Republic of Moldova from 28 November to 1 December 2011. The programme of the visit is appended. We intended to address the implementation of Resolution 1572 (2007) on The honouring of obligations and commitments by Moldova, Resolutions 1666 (2009) and 1692 (2009) on The functioning of democratic institutions , the state of play of the election of the President of the Republic, and other current issues, such as the reform of the judiciary, the action taken to combat corruption and organised crime, the legislation and measures to combat discrimination and the latest developments in Transnistria. 2. The support of the Moldovan delegation to the PACE, the Moldovan parliament, and Mr Ulvi Akhundlu, Head of the Council of Europe Office in Chisinau, was again precious for facilitating our meetings, including with the acting President and Speaker, Mr Marian Lupu, the Prime Minister, Mr Filat, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr Leanca, the Vice-Speaker of the parliament, Mr Plahotniuc, high-level representatives of the judiciary and enforcement bodies, representatives of the media and NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Politički Diskurs Andreja Plenkovića I Tomislava Karamarka 2016. U Jutarnjem I Večernjem Listu
    Politički diskurs Andreja Plenkovića i Tomislava Karamarka 2016. u Jutarnjem i Večernjem listu Dolečki, Marija Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2017 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, The Faculty of Political Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Fakultet političkih znanosti Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:114:624117 Rights / Prava: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-24 Repository / Repozitorij: FPSZG repository - master's thesis of students of political science and journalism / postgraduate specialist studies / disertations Sveučilište u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Diplomski studij novinarstva Marija Dolečki POLITIČKI DISKURS ANDREJA PLENKOVIĆA I TOMISLAVA KARAMARKA 2016. GODINE U JUTARNJEM I VEČERNJEM LISTU DIPLOMSKI RAD Zagreb, 2017. Sveučilište u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Diplomski studij novinarstva POLITIČKI DISKURS ANDREJA PLENKOVIĆA I TOMISLAVA KARAMARKA 2016. GODINE U JUTARNJEM I VEČERNJEM LISTU DIPLOMSKI RAD Mentor: prof. dr. sc. Ivo Žanić Studentica: Marija Dolečki Zagreb rujan, 2017. ii Izjava o autorstvu rada i poštivanju etičkih pravila u akademskom radu: Izjavljujem da sam diplomski rad „Politički diskurs Andreja Plenkovića i Tomislava Karamarka 2016. godine u Jutarnjem i Večernjem listu“ koji sam predala na ocjenu mentoru prof. dr. sc. Ivi Žaniću napisala samostalno i da je u potpunosti riječ o mojem autorskom radu. Također, izjavljujem da rad nije objavljen niti korišten u svrhe ispunjenja nastavnih obveza na ovom ili nekom drugom učilištu te da na temelju njega nisam stekla ECTS bodove. Nadalje, izjavljujem da sam u radu poštivala etička pravila znanstvenog i akademskog rada, a posebno članke 16. 19. Etičkog kodeksa Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia by Andrija Henjak Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.22 Million GNI/Capita, PPP: US$ 21,730 (2015)
    Croatia By Andrija Henjak Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.22 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$ 21,730 (2015) Source: World Bank’s World Development Indicators Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 National Democratic 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.00 3.00 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 and Independence Corruption 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.64 3.71 3.71 3.64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia by Petar Doric´
    Croatia by Petar Doric´ Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.4 million GNI/capita: US$17,050 Source: The data above was provided by The World Bank, World Bank Indicators 2010. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.00 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 Governance* 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.25 3.50 3.50 Local Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 3.75 3.75 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 Corruption 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 Democracy Score 3.54 3.54 3.79 3.83 3.75 3.71 3.75 3.64 3.71 3.71 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova
    Promoting Government Accountability in Moldova A project supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and implemented by Business News Service /Mold-Street.com during 1 May 2017 - 31 May 2018 The version in English 1 Project coordinator: Eugeniu Rîbca All rights reserved Mold-Street.com © 2 Instead of Pay Raise, Government Prepares Pay Optimization in Public Area Public sector employees – especially in the education area – continue to nourish hopes for a perceptible pay raise. This expectation however is unlikely this year, because the salary bill for teachers and lecturers is al- ready too expensive, the Government says. Earlier protests with education employees forced the Govern- ment to pass a number of decisions regarding the remuneration improvements. One of decisions envisages a salary increase for education staff in public institutions and for other employees based on the Common Tar- iff Network. Pay raise promises Starting May 1, 2017, the public education staff in Moldova will receive a monthly raise of 100 lei (5$) and from September they will get a 10% raise, the Labor and Social Protection Ministry announced. At the same time, current legislation and the 2016 economic performance would allow to raise teachers’ salaries by 5.3% while the Government would be looking for additional funding during the amendment of the 2017 budget. On the other hand, the Government admits in the Additional Memorandum on Economic and Financial Poli- cies with the IMF that it is short of resources to increases the public spending, including salaries. Salary expenses are “too large” "On the expense side the salary expenses in the public sector exceed the targets that have been established in the Memorandum with the International Monetary Fund which was signed on October 24, 2016," the execu- tive said in a press release.
    [Show full text]
  • Damnatio Memoriae – the Contested Memory of Antonio Bajamonti in Split
    Damnatio Memoriae – The Contested Memory of Antonio Bajamonti in Split Sara Čović, University of Zadar [email protected] Abstract The nation-building political situation of the 19th century caused a tense situation in today's Croatia which was then divided into smaller provinces - Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia. From 1835 the Croatian national revival movement took place in Croatia and Slavonia until it was interrupted by Bach's absolutism in 1848. The two united entities, Croatia and Slavonia, wanted Dalmatia to become a part of the union but things were different in Dalmatia. In the first half of the 19th century, under the threat of multiple occupiers, people of Dalmatia created a special national ideology that was territorially defined. In that way Dalmatia opposed the request for unification. Such political atmosphere continued in the second half of the 19th century which was marked by fierce political conflicts in Dalmatia. The conflicts mostly erupted between the People's Party, that wanted the unification of Dalmatia and Croatia, and the Autonomous Party, that saw Dalmatia as an autonomous entity. In the period from 1860 until 1880 the mayor of Split was the leader of the Autonomous Party Antonio Bajamonti. Bajamonti's politics and intentions were directed into the prosperity of Split. At the time Split was an underdeveloped town and it can be stated that Bajamonti's policies, such as his urbanization plans, did much for its future development. However, Bajamonti is a historical figure that is almost forgotten in today's Split. Why is that so? That is not an easy question to answer and a few aspects need to be analyzed.
    [Show full text]