DOCSLIB.ORG

Mounce MAPA Thesis FINAL.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mounce MAPA Thesis FINAL.Pdf Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Mounce, Hanna Lee (2015) Recovery of the endangered Maui Parrotbill (Kiwikiu, Pseudonestor xanthophrys). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/50697/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Recovery of the endangered Maui Parrotbill (Kiwikiu, Pseudonestor xanthophrys) Hanna Lee Mounce A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biodiversity Management Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology chool of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent August 2015 Recovery of the Endangered Maui Parrotbill Acknowledgements To begin with, I would like to thank Carl Jones for introducing me to Jim ,roombridge at a Durrell -CT workshop and suggesting the partnership of his supervision of my thesis. -hile Carl barely knew me at the time, his introduction and recommendation got this entire pro/ect underway. econdly, I would like to thank Jim ,roombridge for not only his willingness to take me on as a student but also for his enthusiasm for my pro/ect. Jim0s encouragement and guidance throughout this entire process was above and beyond my e1pectations for an advisor. I also appreciated his fle1ibility in advising a student based 11,000 km away and who decided not only to start other new research pro/ects during this time period but also start a family. I would also like to thank David Leonard who instigated the funding for this pro/ect to cover a PhD student and also gave heaps of advice throughout the writing of every chapter of this thesis. I thank Kirsty winnerton, who served not only as an advisor and editor throughout this entire process but also as an ama2ing support and friend. I also must thank Kirsty for initially hiring me as a temporary field technician on Maui many years ago and introducing me to the ama2ing Hawaiian ecosystem and birds for which I am forever grateful. I also thank Jon Plissner. Jon has been a great mentor through my professional career, and when I was first offered a /ob in Maui I thought that it sounded too challenging and was considering turning it down. Jon told me to stop doubting myself and to take the /ob, thus kickstarting my conservation career in Hawaii. I thank David Duffy for supporting my thesis while I was employed with him through the University of Hawaii and for helping to coordinate and supervise a remote defense from UH. I thank amit Kundu for getting me started in the genetics lab and iobhan impson and 3achel Bristol for their continued help through my lab work as well as their support during my time in the UK. I also thank Claire 3aisin for her help not only in the genetics lab but in getting the structure of my thesis started, helping me sort a place to live in the UK, 2 Recovery of the Endangered Maui Parrotbill teaching me how to salt the roads to be able to get to the lab, and helping me bridge the ad/ustment gap in coming to the UK. I thank all of the field crews of Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect for their dedicated hard work in strenuous field conditions which has provided much of the data used within this thesis. I thank my sisters, Nora Mounce and Emily chol2, and my aunt, Caroline Tepley, for proofing my final thesis. I thank my son, Nolan Te Kahurangi Davidson, who showed up towards the end of my admission period, for being such a wonderful baby and letting me get this submission completed. I also thank my sister, Nora Mounce, and my mother, Charlene Mounce, for coming out to Maui to help watch Nolan while I was finishing writing up this thesis. I thank my entire family for their support and encouragement, especially my brother Phil 73IP8 who left us during the end of my admission period and whom with I will miss celebrating this submission. Lastly I thank my husband, Jamie Davidson, who might not have known the substantial weight of this pro/ect as it was already in the works when we were engaged and married. I appreciate all of his support as well as taking care of our house and all my critters during my long trips to the UK. Acknowledgements specific to each self9standing chapter are located at the end of each chapter. 3 Recovery of the Endangered Maui Parrotbill Author’s eclaration All chapters of this thesis were written by HL Mounce with editorial suggestions from my supervisor, JJ ,roombridge. All work was conducted while HL Mounce was employed by Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect, a part of Pacific Cooperative tudies Unit of 3esearch Corporation of the University of Hawaii and supported through tate of Hawaii Division of 5orestry and -ildlife and United tates 5ish and -ildlife ervice grants. There were numerous people that provided input and comments during the research and publication phases of this thesis. Individual contributions are listed in the chapters below. Co9author affiliations are listed as the institutions at the time of collaboration. Chapter 2 etermining productivity of the Maui Parrotbill, an endangered Hawaiian honeycreeper: The data collected for this chapter was a collaborative effort by the seasonal staff at Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect. Analysis was completed by HL Mounce with assistance of 3 -heeler, CL 3utt and J Milikowsky for the nest survival data. Co9authors all commented on drafts of the manuscript written by HL Mounce before it was submitted for publication. This chapter has been published, Mounce HL, Leonard DL, winnerton KJ, Becker CD, Berthold LK, Iknayan KJ, ,roombridge JJ 720138 Determining productivity of Maui Parrotbills, an endangered Hawaiian honeycreeper. Journal of Field Ornithology 84: 32939. Chapter 3 Management implications derived from long term re-sight data: annual survival of the Maui Parrotbill (Pseudonestor xanthophrys): This chapter used an 18 year encounter dataset from mark9resight data maintained by Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect. HL Mounce contributed field re9 sights from 200692011. All other re9sights were provided by seasonal staff at Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect: TK Pratt, JC imon, PE Baker, and L Pimm. Analyses 4 Recovery of the Endangered Maui Parrotbill were undertaken by HL Mounce with input from EH Pa1ton. All co9authors reviewed and provided guidance and comments on the manuscript written by HL Mounce before submission for publication. This chapter has been published, Mounce HL, Iknayan KJ, Leonard DL, winnerton KJ, ,roombridge JJ 720148. Management implications derived from long term re9sight data: annual survival of the Maui Parrotbill Pseudonestor xanthophrys. Bird Conservation International 24:3169326. Chapter 4 Spatial genetic architecture of the critically-endangered Maui Parrotbill (Pseudonestor xanthophrys): management considerations for reintroduction strategies: Blood samples were collected by HL Mounce 200692012 and the contemporary samples prior to 2006 were provided by Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect. Museum toe9pad samples were provided by the museums listed in the acknowledgements. The microsatellite library was developed by ,enetic Identification ervices, Inc. 7California, U A8. ,uidance and training in laboratory techniques were provided by C 3aisin and Kundu. Microsatellite optimi2ation was assisted by H -ickenden at University of Kent. T3UCTU3E and ,ENELAND analyses were assisted by impson at University of Kent. KJ Iknayan, CC -arren, and 3L Hammond assisted with ,I mapping. All other lab work, analyses, and writing were undertaken by HL Mounce. AC 5rant2 provided 3 code for the simulation to model proportion of alleles that could theoretically be transferred with differing numbers of founder individuals. All co9authors provided comments and edits on a draft manuscript prior to submission for publication. This chapter has been published, Mounce HL, 3aisin C, Leonard DL, -ickenden H, winnerton KJ, ,roombridge JJ 720158 patial genetic architecture of the critically9endangered Maui Parrotbill 7Pseudonestor 1anthophrys8: management considerations for reintroduction strategies. Conservation ,enetics 16:71984. 5 Recovery of the Endangered Maui Parrotbill Chapter 5 E,tinction risk and reintroduction options for the endangered Maui Parrotbill (Kiwikiu, Pseudonestor xanthophrys): The data used in these models is a culmination of the chapters 294. Introduction to PAA methods and the use of their applications was initiated by KJ winnerton. CP Mc,owan and EH Pa1ton provided guidance on analyses and, in combination with the other co9authors, provided comments and edits. The 3 code used to evaluate translocation options was developed by CP Mc,owan and optimi2ed by HL Mounce and CC -arren. This chapter has been submitted for publication and is currently under review. 6 Recovery of the Endangered Maui Parrotbill This research was approved and supported by American Bird Conservancy, Haleakala National Park, Hawaii Audubon ociety, Maui 5orest Bird 3ecovery Pro/ect, Pacific Cooperative tudies Unit 7as a part of the 3esearch Corporation of the University of Hawaii8, The Nature Conservancy Hawaii, The idney Perry 5oundation, Tri9Isle 3CBD, Inc., an Diego Coo ,lobal, tate of Hawaii Division of 5orestry and -ildlife, and United tates 5ish and -ildlife ervice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Mark Macdonald Bsc. Forestry & Environmental Management A
    PRE-TRANSLOCATION ASSESSMENT OF LAYSAN ISLAND, NORTH-WESTERN HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, AS SUITABLE HABITAT FOR THE NIHOA MILLERBIRD (ACROCEPHALUS FAMILIARIS KINGI) by Mark MacDonald BSc. Forestry & Environmental Management A Thesis, Dissertation, or Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MSc. Forestry in the Graduate Academic Unit of Forestry Supervisor: Tony Diamond, PhD, Faculty of Forestry & Environmental Management, Department of Biology. Graham Forbes, PhD, Faculty of Forestry & Environmental Management, Department of Biology. Examining Board: (name, degree, department/field), Chair (name, degree, department/field) This thesis, dissertation or report is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK 01, 2012 ©Mark MacDonald, 2012 DEDICATION To the little Nihoa Millerbird whose antics, struggles and loveliness inspired the passion behind this project and have taught me so much about what it means to be a naturalist. ii ABSTRACT The critically endangered Nihoa Millerbird (Acrocephalus familiaris kingi), endemic to Nihoa Island, is threatened due to an extremely restricted range and invasive species. Laysan Island once supported the sub-species, Laysan Millerbird (Acrocephalus familiaris familiaris), before introduced rabbits caused their extirpation. A translocation of the Nihoa Millerbird from Nihoa Island to Laysan Island would serve two goals; establish a satellite population of a critically endangered species and restore the ecological role played by an insectivore passerine on Laysan Island. Laysan Island was assessed as a suitable translocation site for the Nihoa Millerbird with a focus placed on dietary requirements. This study showed that Laysan Island would serve as a suitable translocation site for the Nihoa Millerbird with adequate densities of invertebrate prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Synonymies for Indigenous Hawaiian Bird Taxa
    Part 2 - Drepaninines Click here for Part 1 - Non-Drepaninines The Birds of the Hawaiian Islands: Occurrence, History, Distribution, and Status Version 2 - 1 January 2017 Robert L. Pyle and Peter Pyle Synonymies for Indigenous Hawaiian Bird Taxa Intensive ornithological surveying by active collectors during the latter 1890s led to several classic publications at the turn of the century, each covering nearly all species and island forms of native Hawaiian birds (Wilson and Evans 1899, Rothschild (1900),schild 1900, Bryan 1901a, Henshaw (1902a), 1902a, Perkins (1903),1903). The related but diverse scientific names appearing in these publications comprised the basis for scientific nomenclature for the next half century, but in many cases were modified by later authors using modern techniques to reach a current nomenclature provided in the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU) Check-List, and followed (for the most part) at this site. A few current AOU names are still controversial, and more changes will come in the future. Synonymies reflecting the history of taxonomic nomenclature are listed below for all endemic birds in the Hawaiian Islands. The heading for each taxon represents that used in this book, reflecting the name used by the AOU (1998), as changed in subsequent AOU Supplements, or, in a few cases, as modified here based on more recent work or on differing opinions on taxonomic ranking. Previously recognized names are listed and citations included for classic publications on taxonomy of Hawaiian birds, as well as significant papers that influenced the species nomenclature. We thank Storrs Olson for sharing with us his summarization on the taxonomy and naming of indigenous Hawaiian birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Trees Provide Habitat for Native Hawaiian Forest Birds
    NON-NATIVE TREES PROVIDE HABITAT FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN FOREST BIRDS By Peter J. Motyka A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Northern Arizona University December 2016 Approved: Jeffrey T. Foster, Ph.D., Co-chair Tad C. Theimer, Ph. D., Co-chair Carol L. Chambers, Ph. D. ABSTRACT NON-NATIVE TREES PROVIDE HABITAT FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN FOREST BIRDS PETER J. MOTYKA On the Hawaiian island of Maui, native forest birds occupy an area dominated by non- native plants that offers refuge from climate-limited diseases that threaten the birds’ persistence. This study documented the status of the bird populations and their ecology in this novel habitat. Using point-transect distance sampling, I surveyed for birds over five periods in 2013-2014 at 123 stations across the 20 km² Kula Forest Reserve (KFR). I documented abundance and densities for four native bird species: Maui ‘alauahio (Paroreomyza montana), ʻiʻiwi (Drepanis coccinea), ʻapapane (Himatione sanguinea), and Hawaiʻi ʻamakihi, (Chlorodrepanis virens), and three introduced bird species: Japanese white-eye (Zosterops japonicas), red-billed leiothrix (Leiothrix lutea), and house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus). I found that 1) native forest birds were as abundant as non-natives, 2) densities of native forest birds in the KFR were similar to those found in native forests, 3) native forest birds showed varying dependence on the structure of the habitats, with ʻiʻiwi and ‘alauahio densities 20 and 30 times greater in forest than in scrub, 4) Maui ‘alauahio foraged most often in non-native cape wattle, eucalyptus, and tropical ash, and nested most often in non-native Monterey cypress, Monterey pine, and eucalyptus.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Kiwikiu Conservation Translocation Report
    2019 Kiwikiu Conservation Translocation Report Christopher C. Warren1, Laura K. Berthold1, Hanna L. Mounce1, Peter Luscomb2, Bryce Masuda3, Lainie Berry4 2020 Maui Forest Bird Recovery Project1 Pacific Bird Conservation2 San Diego Zoo Global3 State of Hawaiʻi, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife4 Suggested citation – Warren, C.C., L.K. Berthold, H.L. Mounce, P. Luscomb, B. Masuda. L. Berry. 2020. Kiwikiu Translocation Report 2019. Internal Report. Pages 1–101. Cover photo by Bret Mossman. Translocated female, WILD11, in Kahikinui Hawaiian Homelands. Photo credits – Photographs were supplied by Maui Forest Bird Recovery Project (MFBRP) staff, members of the press, and volunteers. Photographer credit is given for those not taken by MFBRP staff. The 2019 kiwikiu translocation was a joint operation conducted by member organizations of the Maui Forest Bird Working Group. Organizations that conducted the translocation included American Bird Conservancy, Maui Forest Bird Recovery Project, National Park Service, Pacific Bird Conservation, San Diego Zoo Global, State of Hawaiʻi Department of Land and Natural Resources – Division of Forestry and Wildlife, The Nature Conservancy of Hawai‘i, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and U.S. Geological Survey. In addition to representatives of these organizations, six community volunteers aided in these efforts. This does not include the dozens of volunteers and other organizations involved in planning for the translocation and preparing the release site through restoration and other activities. These efforts were greatly supported by the skilled pilots at Windward Aviation. i Table of Contents 1. Summary of 2019 Reintroduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Background of the Reintroduction ....................................................................................................... 1 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Metadata for Hawaii Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI)
    HYDRO Hawaii ESI: HYDRO (Hydrology Polygons and Lines) Metadata: Identification_Information Data_Quality_Information Spatial_Data_Organization_Information Spatial_Reference_Information Entity_and_Attribute_Information Distribution_Information Metadata_Reference_Information Identification_Information: Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington Publication_Date: 200111 Title: Hawaii ESI: HYDRO (Hydrology Polygons and Lines) Edition: Second Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Vector digital data Series_Information: Series_Name: None Issue_Identification: Hawaii Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Seattle, Washington Publisher: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington Other_Citation_Details: Prepared by Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington Description: Abstract: This data set contains vector arcs and polygons representing coastal hydrography used in the creation of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) for Hawaii. The HYDRO data layer contains all annotation used in producing the atlas. The annotation features are categorized into
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NIHOA ISLAND TRIP REPORT, 21-29 SEPTEMBER 2013 To
    NIHOA ISLAND TRIP REPORT, 21-29 SEPTEMBER 2013 To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Honolulu, Hawai‘i. From: Sheldon Plentovich, Chris Farmer, Joshua Fisher, Holly Freifeld, and Rachel Rounds Recommended Citation: Plentovich, S., C. Farmer, J. Fisher, H. Freifeld, and R. Rounds. 2013. Nihoa Island biological monitoring and management, 21-29 September 2013. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conducted Variable Circular Plot surveys for Nihoa Millerbird (Acrocephalus familiaris) and the Nihoa Finch (Telespiza ultima) 23-28 September 2013 at 60 points. There were 270 Millerbird and 569 Nihoa Finch detections, with a range of 0 - 6 and 1 - 9 respectively. The detection rate of Millerbirds increased sharply between 2012 and 2013, suggesting there might have been an increase in this species. Conversely, the detection rate of Nihoa Finches declined, suggesting this species might have declined. The U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division is completing a report that will compare population estimates from the distance-based strip-transect and variable circular plot methods performed in 2012. Six banded Nihoa Millerbirds were resighted. Fourteen seabird species were observed on Nihoa and 13 of the 14 were nesting or had fledglings. Three species of migratory shorebirds were observed. Fifteen native plant species were found and appeared healthy. A total of 25 grey bird locusts (Schistocerca nitens) were observed during passerine surveys. A single non-native sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus) was detected and removed. The plant was located down slope from Cluster 2, about 100 meters above our campsite, with a little bit of green growth still present.
    [Show full text]
  • Nihoa Island Trip Report 2012
    NIHOA ISLAND TRIP REPORT, 14-25 AUGUST 2012 To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Honolulu, Hawaii. From: Kevin Brinck, Ann P. Marshall, Walterbea Aldeguer, and Daniel Tsukayama. Recommended Citation: Marshall, A.P., K.W. Brinck, W. Aldeguer, and D. H. Tsukayama. 2012. Nihoa Island biological monitoring and management, 14-25 August 2012. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Note: This report does not include activities associated with the second translocation of Nihoa Millerbirds (Acrocephalus familiaris) from Nihoa to Laysan, which is covered in a separate report (Farmer et al. 2012). This report includes only monitoring and management activities conducted after the M/V Searcher departed Nihoa Island on 15 August 2012. Executive Summary: After the transfer of captured Nihoa Millerbirds to the MV Searcher, which departed 15 August, population monitoring surveys were conducted for the Nihoa Millerbird and the Nihoa Finch (Telespiza ultima), 15-22 August, using two methods. The traditional strip transect method resulted in population estimates of 401 ± 163.0 (mean ± standard deviation) Nihoa Millerbirds and 4,613 ± 944.8 Nihoa Finches. The estimated number was low for Nihoa Millerbirds and high for Nihoa Finches relative to last year. The team observed that Millerbirds were less vocal this year than 2011 which may account for the low numbers of Millerbirds detected this year, while the high estimate of Nihoa Finches may be due to the abundance of fledglings present during the surveys. Population estimates from the distance based line transect and variable circular plot methods will be forthcoming from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Rules
    21282 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR United States and the Government of United States or U.S. territories as a Canada Amending the 1916 Convention result of recent taxonomic changes; Fish and Wildlife Service between the United Kingdom and the (8) Change the common (English) United States of America for the names of 43 species to conform to 50 CFR Part 10 Protection of Migratory Birds, Sen. accepted use; and (9) Change the scientific names of 135 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0047; Treaty Doc. 104–28 (December 14, FXMB 12320900000//201//FF09M29000] 1995); species to conform to accepted use. (2) Mexico: Convention between the The List of Migratory Birds (50 CFR RIN 1018–BC67 United States and Mexico for the 10.13) was last revised on November 1, Protection of Migratory Birds and Game 2013 (78 FR 65844). The amendments in General Provisions; Revised List of this rule were necessitated by nine Migratory Birds Mammals, February 7, 1936, 50 Stat. 1311 (T.S. No. 912), as amended by published supplements to the 7th (1998) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Protocol with Mexico amending edition of the American Ornithologists’ Interior. Convention for Protection of Migratory Union (AOU, now recognized as the American Ornithological Society (AOS)) ACTION: Final rule. Birds and Game Mammals, Sen. Treaty Doc. 105–26 (May 5, 1997); Check-list of North American Birds (AOU 2011, AOU 2012, AOU 2013, SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and (3) Japan: Convention between the AOU 2014, AOU 2015, AOU 2016, AOS Wildlife Service (Service), revise the Government of the United States of 2017, AOS 2018, and AOS 2019) and List of Migratory Birds protected by the America and the Government of Japan the 2017 publication of the Clements Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) by for the Protection of Migratory Birds and Checklist of Birds of the World both adding and removing species.
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT of THE
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/28/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-25634, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 10 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0047; FXMB 12320900000//189//FF09M29000] RIN 1018–BC67 General Provisions; Revised List of Migratory Birds AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to revise the List of Migratory Birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) by both adding and removing species. Reasons for the changes to the list include adding species based on new taxonomy and new evidence of natural occurrence in the United States or U.S. territories, removing species no longer known to occur within the United States or U.S. territories, and changing names to conform to accepted use. The net increase of 59 species (66 added and 7 removed) would bring the total number of species protected by the MBTA to 1,085. We regulate the taking, possession, transportation, sale, purchase, barter, exportation, and importation of migratory birds. An accurate and up-to-date list of species protected by the MBTA is essential for public notification and regulatory purposes. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0047; FXMB 12320900000//201//FF09M29000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/16/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-06779, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 10 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0047; FXMB 12320900000//201//FF09M29000] RIN 1018–BC67 General Provisions; Revised List of Migratory Birds AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), revise the List of Migratory Birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) by both adding and removing species. Reasons for the changes to the list include adding species based on new taxonomy and new evidence of natural occurrence in the United States or U.S. territories, removing species no longer known to occur within the United States or U.S. territories, and changing names to conform to accepted use. The net increase of 67 species (75 added and 8 removed) will bring the total number of species protected by the MBTA to 1,093. We regulate the taking, possession, transportation, sale, purchase, barter, exportation, and importation of migratory birds. An accurate and up-to-date list of species protected by the MBTA is essential for public notification and regulatory purposes. DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric L. Kershner, Chief of the Branch of Conservation, Permits, and Regulations; Division of Migratory Bird Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; MS: MB; 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803; (703) 358-2376.
    [Show full text]
  • Nihoa Island Trip Report 2014
    NIHOA ISLAND TRIP REPORT, 23 SEPTEMBER TO 3 OCTOBER 2014 To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Honolulu, Hawai‘i. From: Sheldon Plentovich, Chris Farmer, Megan Laut, Annie Marshall, and Rachel Rounds Recommended Citation: Plentovich, S., C. Farmer, M. Laut, A. Marshall, and R. Rounds. 2014. Nihoa Island biological monitoring and management, 23 September - 3 October 2014. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conducted Variable Circular Plot surveys for Nihoa Millerbird (Acrocephalus familiaris) and Nihoa Finch (Telespiza ultima) 26 - 29 September 2014. Each of the 60 stations was surveyed 1–3 times. There were 297 Nihoa Millerbird and 512 Nihoa Finch detections, with a range of 0–8 and 1–13 for each species detected per survey, respectively. Both species were detected at each of the 60 survey stations. The detection rate of Millerbirds increased sharply between 2012 and 2013 and continued to increase in 2014, suggesting an increase in the Millerbird population. The detection rate of Nihoa Finches declined from 2012 to 2013, but increased in 2014. Nine banded Nihoa Millerbirds were resighted. Feather samples collected from 101 Nihoa Finches are being analyzed to identify any potential geographic differentiation within the population and the meta-populations level of heterozygosity and inbreeding. This, along with a photographic database of plumage variation in relation to sex, will be used to refine our ability to age and sex finches and will inform the age and sex composition of potential future translocation cohorts. Fourteen seabird species were observed on Nihoa (See Table 4 for information on species abundance and nesting phenology).
    [Show full text]