2015-2019 Capital Program, We’Ll Continue Making Our System More Resilient Against Big Storms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2015-2019 Capital Program, We’Ll Continue Making Our System More Resilient Against Big Storms MTA Capital Program 2015-2019 Renew. Enhance. Expand. CAPITAL PROGRAM mta.info/capital As Proposed to the MTA Board September 24, 2014 MTA Capital Program 2015-2019 Renew. Enhance. Expand. CAPITAL PROGRAM mta.info/capital As Proposed to the MTA Board September 24, 2014 1 New York never stops. From morning-rush commuters to late-night club- goers, from school children on subways to seniors on buses, millions of people rely on the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to get them through their daily lives. Without a robust and well-maintained network of railroads, subways, bus routes, bridges, and tunnels, New York as we know it could not function. I first joined the MTA in 1982 to help rebuild an aging network that struggled to move 5.3 million people every day. Today, farsighted investments by New York leaders over the past three decades have revitalized the MTA network— the engine for a New York metropolitan regional economy that accounts for 11 percent of our nation’s GDP and now moves 8.7 million customers a day. The key to keeping this system moving safely and reliably and to keeping our region vibrant has been the MTA’s Capital Program. Every five years, the MTA takes a hard look at its system and its infrastructure to identify and prioritize the invest- ments that will be essential to renew, enhance, and expand the system to meet the changing needs of the region, its economy, and its residents. The first MTA Capital Program was launched in 1982. That infusion of resources transformed a declining system and revitalized New York City and State, and we haven’t stopped investing in our network since. More than 30 years and $100 billion later, the Capital Program has given us a system we can depend on 24 hours every day of the year. Take our current 2010-2014 Capital Program: We bought new subway cars, new commuter railroad cars, new local buses, and new express buses. We installed modern, Communications-Based Train Control signals for faster and better rides. We brought real-time service information to much of our network. We built new rail lines and connec- tions that will serve New York for generations to come. And after Superstorm Sandy ravaged our network, we com- mitted nearly $1 billion to fix the damage and fortify against future storms. With a fully-funded 2015-2019 Capital Program, we’ll continue making our system more resilient against big storms. We’ll bring Positive Train Control—a state-of-the-art signal system—to Metro-North and the LIRR. We’ll continue intro- ducing new routes for Select Bus Service, which uses off-board fare collection, low-floor, high-capacity buses, and dedicated bus lanes to cut travel times by nearly 20 percent. We’ll replace 86 miles of subway track with safer, smoother track. And we’ll complete hundreds of similar projects that keep our customers safe and on time. These types of projects may not be glamorous, but together with the normal replacement of our trains and buses, they are the key to moving 8.7 million people every day, safely and reliably. 2 We’ll also review the findings of the MTA Transportation Reinvention Commission, which I convened at Governor Cuomo’s urging, to develop recommendations that will help us prepare the MTA for its next 100 years. In addition to ensuring the safety and reliability of the entire MTA network, these efforts will ensure the resiliency of our transit network by addressing the increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, as well as the expansion needs resulting from shifting regional demographics. Of course, a fully-funded Capital Program brings other impor- tant benefits—jobs and economic development throughout New York State. The New York Building Congress estimated that the MTA alone would account for 25 percent of New York City’s construction industry in 2012. That’s 18,000 jobs. The 2010-2014 Capital Program is generating 350,000 New York jobs and an overall economic impact of $44 billion through- out New York State. The simple fact is, we couldn’t keep our system running— much less employ a quarter of New York City’s construction industry—without our Capital Program. All the major cities of the world—London, Paris, Hong Kong, and others—are making significant investments in their transport systems in order to maintain their worldwide status as global financial and business centers. New York must do the same, because today, after more than 30 years of success, this basic fact is now clear: An investment in the MTA’s Capital Program is an investment in the future of New York. Thomas F. Prendergast Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Metropolitan Transportation Authority 3 The Fulton Center’s “Oculus.” Natural light will stream through this skylight into the entire station, even to the platform level. 2015-2019 Program Priorities and Major Objectives Through the 2015-2019 Capital Program, the MTA will provide safe and reliable service by continuously improving our capital assets, funding projects based on the following priorities: Renew: Our first priority is to protect the safety, reliability, and quality of our existing service. That means replacing trains, buses, and subway cars, and renewing track, signals, yards, depots, bridges, and stations. Enhance: Service improvements like Help Points, ADA accessibility, and next train arrival information help make your trip better every day. Expand: Expanding the MTA’s reach, through projects like the Second Avenue Subway and access to Penn Station for Metro-North, allows us to ease crowding, accommodate and create growth, and deliver more extensive and resilient service. We will also advance the following major investment objectives: • Complete the installation of Positive Train Control—a state-of-the-art train-control system—at Metro-North and the Long Island Rail Road. • Expand Select Bus Service to appropriate routes across New York City, in conjunction with our partners at NYCDOT. • Introduce new “contactless” fare payment technology that will work with smartphones and across our entire network. • Continue the rollout of countdown clocks on our subway’s numbered lines, and introduce countdown clocks to many of our lettered lines. • Design and begin construction on the next phase of the Second Avenue Subway to ease congestion and improve mobility on Manhattan’s East Side. • Begin Penn Access, which will open a new Metro-North Railroad link directly into Penn Station, providing critical system resiliency to protect service for more than 275,000 daily customers in the event of natural or other disasters. • Complete the Long Island Rail Road Double Track project, which will improve service and reliability by adding a second track to the LIRR’s Ronkonkoma Branch. • Complete the installation of Help Points—high-tech, highly visible intercoms that instantly connect customers to information and emergency services—in every one of our 468 subway stations. 5 Twenty Year Needs: Informing Investments for a 21st Century Transit System To develop the 2015-2019 Capital Program, we analyzed the building blocks of our system and the trends that will shape the next 20 years of regional mobility—a process we call the Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment.* Through this structured, two-year process, we developed a picture of the next twenty years of capital investment by merging investments that renew our assets—promoting what we call a “state of good repair”—with “vision” invest- ments that enhance and expand the system in step with changing regional demands. Below are more details on these critically important investment categories. Asset Renewal All five of our operating agencies—New York City Transit, Metro-North, LIRR, MTA Bus, and Bridges and Tunnels— perform comprehensive asset condition inventories to identify assets needing renewal. The results inform invest- ments in the 2015-2019 Capital Program that promote safe and reliable service, including investments in fleets, track, signals, and power. Over the past 30 years, renewal investments have transformed the MTA system, and these investments remain our primary focus in the years to come. Vision Investments that enhance and expand the system are developed through a comprehensive analysis of regional trends, including travel patterns, shifts in employment, and technological developments. These lead to many of the investments in the 2015-2019 Program, from expanded Select Bus Service to contactless fare payment to more real-time travel information. *The latest 2015-2034 Twenty-Year Capital Needs Assessment was released in October 2013 and is available for download at mta.info/capital. 6 90 miles 70 miles 120 miles The MTA’s 5,000 square-mile network Renewing, Enhancing, and Expanding a $1 Trillion Asset Base The Twenty Year Needs Assessment informs investments in thousands and thousands of assets—from trains and buses to signals and track to seven highway bridges and two tunnels. All of these assets make up the MTA’s indispensable transit network, which spans 5,000 square miles. We have more than 2,000 miles of track— enough to stretch from New York to Phoenix, Arizona. We use enough power to light the city of Buffalo, and our bridges have enough support cabling to circle the Earth more than 3.5 times. Put together, these assets are worth nearly $1 trillion and require ongoing investment to keep them safe and reliable. 713 2,393 2,078 Stations Commuter Track Miles Fleet 6,465 9 5,643 Subway Bridges and Buses Cars Tunnels 7 Investing to Ensure Safety … At today’s MTA, safety is our top priority, and the 2015-2019 Capital Program is essential to our continuing efforts to make our network safer every day. Here are some of the ways we’ll improve safety through the Program.
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz
    THE OFFICE OF THE QUEENS BOROUGH PRESIDENT Strategic Policy Statement 2014 Melinda Katz Queens Borough President The Borough of Queens is home to more than 2.3 million residents, representing more than 120 countries and speaking more than 135 languages1. The seamless knit that ties these distinct cultures and transforms them into shared communities is what defines the character of Queens. The Borough’s diverse population continues to steadily grow. Foreign-born residents now represent 48% of the Borough’s population2. Traditional immigrant gateways like Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights, Elmhurst, Corona, and Flushing are now communities with the highest foreign-born population in the entire city3. Immigrant and Intercultural Services The immigrant population remains largely underserved. This is primarily due to linguistic and cultural barriers. Residents with limited English proficiency now represent 28% of the Borough4, indicating a need for a wide range of social service support and language access to City services. All services should be available in multiple languages, and outreach should be improved so that culturally sensitive programming can be made available. The Borough President is actively working with the Queens General Assembly, a working group organized by the Office of the Queens Borough President, to address many of these issues. Cultural Queens is amidst a cultural transformation. The Borough is home to some of the most iconic buildings and structures in the world, including the globally recognized Unisphere and New York State Pavilion. Areas like Astoria and Long Island City are establishing themselves as major cultural hubs. In early 2014, the New York City Council designated the area surrounding Kaufman Astoria Studios as the city’s first arts district through a City Council Proclamation The areas unique mix of adaptively reused residential, commercial, and manufacturing buildings serve as a catalyst for growth in culture and the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System
    Under the Big Apple: a Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System by Emma Marie Waterloo This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Tomlan,Michael Andrew (Chairperson) Chusid,Jeffrey M. (Minor Member) UNDER THE BIG APPLE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF PRESERVATION PRACTICE AND THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Emma Marie Waterloo August 2010 © 2010 Emma Marie Waterloo ABSTRACT The New York City Subway system is one of the most iconic, most extensive, and most influential train networks in America. In operation for over 100 years, this engineering marvel dictated development patterns in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. The interior station designs of the different lines chronicle the changing architectural fashion of the aboveground world from the turn of the century through the 1940s. Many prominent architects have designed the stations over the years, including the earliest stations by Heins and LaFarge. However, the conversation about preservation surrounding the historic resource has only begun in earnest in the past twenty years. It is the system’s very heritage that creates its preservation controversies. After World War II, the rapid transit system suffered from several decades of neglect and deferred maintenance as ridership fell and violent crime rose. At the height of the subway’s degradation in 1979, the decision to celebrate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the opening of the subway with a local landmark designation was unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources Part1
    Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources APPENDIX G G.1 Section 106 Effects Assessment and Relevant Correspondence G.2 Phase IA Studies and Relevant Correspondence G.3 Draft Programmatic Agreement G.4 Historic Architectural Resources Background Study (HARBS) and Relevant Correspondence G.5 Project Initiation Letter (PIL) Relevant Correspondence G.6 Miscellaneous Correspondence PENN STATION ACCESS PROJECT: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation May 2021 Penn Station Access Project: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f)Evaluation Appendix G. Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources G.1 SECTION 106 EFFECTS ASSESSMENT AND RELEVANT CORRESPONDENCE MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Section 106 Effects Assessment Prepared for: Prepared by: Lynn Drobbin & Associates, Historical Perspectives, Inc., and July 2019 Penn Station Access Project: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Section 106 Effects Assessment Contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 2. Project Description ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 PROJECT NEED ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 PROPOSED SERVICE ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LEGEND Location of Facilities on NOAA/NYSDOT Mapping
    (! Case 10-T-0139 Hearing Exhibit 2 Page 45 of 50 St. Paul's Episcopal Church and Rectory Downtown Ossining Historic District Highland Cottage (Squire House) Rockland Lake (!304 Old Croton Aqueduct Stevens, H.R., House inholding All Saints Episcopal Church Complex (Church) Jug Tavern All Saints Episcopal Church (Rectory/Old Parish Hall) (!305 Hook Mountain Rockland Lake Scarborough Historic District (!306 LEGEND Nyack Beach Underwater Route Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve CP Railroad ROW Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve CSX Railroad ROW Rockefeller Park Preserve (!307 Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve NYS Canal System, Underground (! Rockefeller Park Preserve Milepost Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve )" Sherman Creek Substation Rockefeller Park Preserve Rockefeller Park Preserve Methodist Episcopal Church at Nyack *# Yonkers Converter Station Rockefeller Park Preserve Upper Nyack Firehouse ^ Mine Rockefeller Park Preserve Van Houten's Landing Historic District (!308 Park Rockefeller Park Preserve Union Church of Pocantico Hills State Park Hopper, Edward, Birthplace and Boyhood Home Philipse Manor Railroad Station Untouched Wilderness Dutch Reformed Church Rockefeller, John D., Estate Historic Site Tappan Zee Playhouse Philipsburg Manor St. Paul's United Methodist Church US Post Office--Nyack Scenic Area Ross-Hand Mansion McCullers, Carson, House Tarrytown Lighthouse (!309 Harden, Edward, Mansion Patriot's Park Foster Memorial A.M.E. Zion Church Irving, Washington, High School Music Hall North Grove Street Historic District DATA SOURCES: NYS DOT, ESRI, NOAA, TDI, TRC, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF Christ Episcopal Church Blauvelt Wayside Chapel (Former) First Baptist Church and Rectory ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (NYDEC), NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS RECREATION AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION (OPRHP) Old Croton Aqueduct Old Croton Aqueduct NOTES: (!310 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014
    BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting
    Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting March 2019 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/25/2019 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2019 Work Plan 2019 MNR Work Plan - Page 14 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 22 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 25 5. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Elevator & Escalator Report - Page 66 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 74 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 122 Lease Agreement for Hastings Station Lease Agreement for Hastings Station - Page 133 License agreement for Purdy's Station License Agreement for Purdy's Station - Page 135 6. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 137 MNR Non-Competitive Procurements MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 140 MNR Competitive Procurements MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 7. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 149 8. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 160 9. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 181 10. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 192 Next Meeting: Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 15th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 25, 2019 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements
    Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements Capital Engineering - Shops and Yards & Strategic Facilities Date: February 2020 Metro-North Railroad Program Goals: Brewster Yard & Southeast Station Parking Improvements Currently Brewster train yard is at capacity and cannot accommodate the future fleet and operations required to support Metro-North (MNR) Harlem Line long-term ridership growth. MNR sets forth to accomplish the following goals to meet the demand: Relocate the existing Southeast Station parking into a new parking facility, east of the station within the Metro-North’s, 52-acre property: Improve customer service and traffic circulation with more convenient, expanded parking and intermodal access. Expand and modernize Brewster Yard to support long-term ridership growth: Extend the existing yard to the north into the current Southeast Parking footprint after the new parking facility is complete. Improve Southeast Station’s overpass, platform, and canopy to enhance its aesthetics, safety and amenities. 2 Three-Phased Program Approach Phase I Parking and Access Improvements Brewster Yard Station Improvements Phase II North Yard CONSTRUCTION / Construction MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROAD PEDSTRIAN ACCESS East Parcel Phase III South Yard Reconfiguration 3 PHASE I – Parking Facility, Access and Station Improvements Major project elements: Construct a new 1,000 plus - space garage to replace the existing surface parking lots at Southeast Station. Construct a new fly-over bridge that will connect Independent Way to the new parking facility. Extend the existing pedestrian overpass to the new parking facility. Pedestrian Access from the parking facility to the northern end of island platform is being planned; existing track curvature may have an impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Acceso a La Estación Penn Station
    Acceso a la estación Penn Station Cuatro nuevas estaciones en East Bronx con servicio directo de Metro- North hacia la estación Penn Station, Westchester y Connecticut. Viajes más rápidos. Servicio expandido. El proyecto utilizará la actual línea Hell Gate de Amtrak para acceder a la estación Penn Station, lo que incrementará el Conexiones regionales. potencial de la infraestructura existente y a la vez minimizará el efecto en la comunidad circundante. También El servicio de Metro-North desde el Bronx, Westchester y dejará la línea Hell Gate en un buen estado de reparación Connecticut a la estación Penn Station y el lado oeste de y mejorará tanto la fiabilidad como la puntualidad para los Manhattan está a un paso de materializarse. El acceso a la pasajeros interurbanos. estación Penn Station respaldará la equidad, la conectividad regional y la fiabilidad al ofrecer una nueva opción de transporte público. Además de las nuevas estaciones, el proyecto convertirá el ferrocarril de 2 vías actual en un ferrocarril mayor de 4 vías con más de 19 millas de vías nuevas y rehabilitadas. El Con cuatro estaciones de ferrocarril nuevas en el East Bronx proyecto también incluye el reacondicionamiento de 4 accesibles para pasajeros según las disposiciones de la Ley puentes, la reconfiguración de la playa de New Rochelle de para Estadounidenses con Discapacidades y mejoras Metro-North, 4 enclavamientos nuevos y 1 enclavamiento significativas en la infraestructura ferroviaria, el acceso de reconfigurado, 5 subestaciones nuevas y 2 mejoradas, y Penn Station respaldará la economía local y atraerá el talento modernizaciones de la infraestructura de señalización, regional al aumentar la accesibilidad a barrios de pocos energía y comunicación.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Narrative 2018
    Annual Report Narrative 2018 Submitted as part of the MTA 2018 Annual Report Pursuant to New York State Public Authorities Law Section 2800(1) Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2018 Annual Report to the Governor Pursuant to New York State Public Authorities Law §2800 MTA 2018 ANNUAL REPORT NARRATIVE Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Sections 2800 (1)(a)(1), (6), (11), (13), and (17) Section 1—Operations and Performance Performance 1 NYC Transit (Subways and Buses) Long Island Rail Road ▪ Metro-North Railroad ▪ MTA Bus Company ▪ Bridges and Tunnels Section 2—Accomplishments and Initiatives Customer Service Initiatives 17 Interagency ▪ NYC Transit (Subways) ▪ MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) ▪ Long Island Rail Road ▪ Metro-North Railroad ▪ Bridges and Tunnels Operations/Technology Initiatives 26 Interagency ▪ NYC Transit (Subways) ▪ MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) ▪ Long Island Rail Road ▪ Metro-North Railroad ▪ Bridges and Tunnels Sustainability/Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Initiatives 35 Interagency ▪ NYC Transit (Subways) ▪ MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) ▪ Long Island Rail Road ▪ Metro-North Railroad ▪ Bridges and Tunnels Safety/Security Initiatives 43 Interagency: MTA Police Department ▪ NYC Transit (Subways) ▪ MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) ▪ Long Island Rail Road ▪ Metro-North Railroad ▪ Bridges and Tunnels Cost-Cutting/Revenue Initiatives 54 Interagency ▪ NYC Transit (Subways) ▪ MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Department of Buses, MTA Bus Company) ▪ Long Island Rail Road ▪ Metro-North Railroad ▪ Bridges and Tunnels Section 3—Capital Projects Commitments/Completions The MTA Capital Programs 61 Capital Program Progress 62 Funding Received Through December 31, 2018 ▪ Capital Program Progress, 1982-2018 ▪ Capital Program Progress, 2018 New York City Transit (Subways) 64 Major 2018 Commitments ▪ Major 2018 Completions MTA Bus Operations (NYCT Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2018 Amendment CPRB
    SubmittedInterior_April2018_CapProg_Ex SummFEB_2018 4/23/18 12:16 PM Page 1 MTA Capital Program 2015–2019 Renew. Enhance. Expand. CAPITAL PROGRAM Amendment No. 3 mta.info/capital As Submitted to the Capital Program Review Board April 2018 1 18 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Overview……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Program Evolution and Proposed Changes ……………………..………………………………………………..………..…………….… 24 Investment Summary……………………………………………………………………..………..……………………………….………………… 25 Program Funding……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………..…… 26 MTA Core……………………………………….……………………………………………….……………………………………………... 29 MTA New York City Transit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 29 MTA Long Island Rail Road………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 MTA Metro-North Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 63 MTA Bus Company……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 75 MTA Interagency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 79 MTA Network Expansion……………………………………………………………….………………………..……………………….. 85 MTA Bridges and Tunnels……………………………………………………….………………………………………………...…….. 97 Project Listings………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………...……… 107 MTA New York City Transit…………………....…………………………………….……………………………………………………………………….. 111 MTA Long Island Rail Road……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… 135 MTA Metro-North Railroad……………………………………………………………………………………………..……..….….….….….…… 143 MTA Bus Company…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….….….
    [Show full text]
  • The Bronx Lagoon Is Also a Lounge and a Game Room
    EDUCATIONAugust 2010 BRONX/RIVERDALE FALLFREE Familywww.webfamilyny.com Beyond the Beach One family’s cruise PlanningPlanning aheadahead 27 ways to manage the school year Success! Our columnist meets her weight-loss goal Where to go in AUGUST? Check out our Going Places BRONX Family August 2010 Letter from the publisher t’s August already. Isn’t it amazing how I the summer weeks whizz by? July was a hot month and seemed more like August, which makes me wonder what August will be like. The days are getting shorter, although there’s still plenty of light at the end of the day to eat outdoors, have dinner on the beach, or barbeque on the grill. My family has been to the beach quite fre- FEATURES COLUMNS quently this summer and I don’t mind telling 2 Newbie Dad you that my beach of choice — and the one 6 Back-to-school checklist BY BRIAN KANTZ that’s most accessible and inviting — has been, How to get your A in organization this fall and still is, the clean and lovely beach/board- BY CAROL BRZOZOWSKI 4 Good Sense Eating walk at Long Beach. 8 Happy, minus 15 pounds BY CHRISTINE M. PALUmbO, RD Did I mention that we don’t live in Long After six months, Kathy achieves her diet goal Beach and that every summer we buy a family BY KATHY SENA 10 Family Health beach pass? I’m certain there are local people BY IVAN HAND, MD, FAAP who think we are a hibernating family that 12 Cruise control lives out there but only appears in the warmer Disney boats are fun for the whole family 30 It Figures months.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN - MARCH, 2012 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol
    The ERA BULLETIN - MARCH, 2012 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 55, No. 3 March, 2012 The Bulletin THIRD AVENUE’S POOR FINANCIAL CONDITION LED Published by the Electric TO ITS CAR BUILDING PROGRAM 75 YEARS AGO Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box (Continued from February, 2012 issue) 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. In the previous issue, we explained how the also developed a dynamic brake, which was company began its rebuilding program in installed on the Yonkers cars operating on For general inquiries, 1934. At that time, Third Avenue began the extremely hilly terrain. Retardation faded as contact us at bulletin@ rebuilding of 100 single-truck steel converti- car speed decreased. It also served as an erausa.org or by phone bles by lengthening them, installing bolsters, emergency brake, which could slow down the at (212) 986-4482 (voice and converting them to double-truck cars. car if the air brakes failed. Because auto- mail available). ERA’s These cars weighed approximately 39,000 matic acceleration was too expensive, the website is www.erausa.org. pounds and seated 54 passengers. These company installed a series-parallel controller rebuilds weighed approximately 4,000 where the rate of acceleration was at the dis- Editorial Staff: pounds less than the older wood and steel cretion of the Motorman. Editor-in-Chief: cars, which weighed approximately 43,000 Cars were illuminated by twenty 30-volt Bernard Linder News Editor: pounds and seated 48 passengers. Weight bare bulbs in series. If one bulb burned out, it Randy Glucksman was reduced by using aluminum alloy tubing short-circuited internally and the others were Contributing Editor: instead of painted steel pipe and black enam- slightly brighter.
    [Show full text]