DOCSLIB.ORG

CMU School of Architecture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CMU School of Architecture School of Architecture 2013-2014 Undergraduate Student Handbook introduction 2 soarch mission 3 1 cmu & soarch history 4 school history, chronology of school heads bachelor of architecture degree 6 naab criteria, residency, minors, double majors, dual degree curriculum 8 course sequence, curriculum chart course guidelines 10 sequence, requirements, auditing, pass/fail, adding/dropping classes, electives, independent study academic rules & procedures 12 advising, academic actions, academic integrity, documentation, grades registration 18 online registration, online academic audit, cross-registration transfers 19 transfer within the university, transfer credit, studio transfer credit masters degrees 20 accelerated master program, soarch graduate degree programs study away 22 categories, programs, qualifications, application, language, term of study, returning after study academic recognition 25 academic recognition, commencement recognitnion, fourth-year design awards student opportunities 28 prizes, internship funds, schoarships, competitions, undergraduate fellowship & research office student programs 31 student advisory council, aias, apm, ice cream, special topic sessions, organizations soarch employment 32 architecture explorations, monitors, teaching assistantships, work-study finding an internship 33becoming an architect, idp, career center, tartantrak, recruiting website, alumni networking, references facilities 35 studios, furniture, keys, projectors, copier/fax equipment, display screens fabrication facilities 36 paint spray booth, architecture shop, dfab lab computing 37 usage, equipment, rules, server, software, scanning, printing, media centers, cfa cluster, flat screen monitors communications 39 e-mail policy, soarch website, what’s good, newsletters, facebook, calendar, display cases, message boards studio culture policy 41 studio culture definition, core values, the studio culture policy, implementation/ arbitration resources 48 soarch resources, university resources, useful websites, design competition websites, job search websites school administration 50 administration and staff job descriptions directory 51 soarch staff, faculty, and researchers academic calendar 54 breaks, add/drop deadlines, semester reviews, studio documentation, final exams Introduction The School of Architecture (SoArch) Please refer to the back of this handbook for “In the United States, most state registration Undergraduate Student Handbook is a guide useful information such as architect resource boards require a degree from an accredited to SoArch rules, policies, and procedures. websites, the academic calendar, facilities professional degree program as a prerequisite It is designed to give answers to common hours, and a directory of faculty and staff. for licensure. The National Architectural questions about the school, its curriculum, the We ask that all students familiarize themselves Accrediting Board (NAAB), which is the sole university, and your role as a student in the with the contents of this handbook. A new agency authorized to accredit U.S. professional five-year Bachelor of Architecture professional edition is issued every year to ensure accuracy. degree programs in architecture, recognizes three degree program. For additional information or We welcome comments, questions, and types of degrees: the Bachelor of Architecture, clarification, you may consult with SoArch staff, suggestions; our goal is to make this document the Master of Architecture, and the Doctor of faculty, and other university personnel. an essential resource for our undergraduates Architecture. A program may be granted a 6-year, and encourage feedback to make each edition 3-year, or 2-year term of accreditation, depending The material in this handbook is based on more effective. on the extent of its conformance with established current policies, procedures, and requirements. educational standards. Changes to any policies will be communicated To understand the unique requirements of to all students as they occur. For this reason, an architecture education, we have included Doctor of Architecture and Master of Architecture it is strongly recommended that students the following summary from the National degree programs may consist of a pre- regularly check the SoArch website and Architectural Accrediting Board’s 2009 edition professional undergraduate degree and a calendar at www.cmu.edu/architecture and of Conditions for Accreditation for Professional professional graduate degree that, when earned their CMU email accounts. Students should Degree Programs in Architecture: sequentially, constitute an accredited professional also be familiar with the policies laid out in the education. However, the preprofessional degree CMU Student Handbook, The Word, which is not, by itself, recognized as an accredited can be found online: www.cmu.edu/student- degree.” affairs/theword. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Architecture offers the following NAAB-accredited degree programs: B. Arch. (450 undergraduate units) Next accreditation visit for BArch program: 2018 SoArch Mission 3 Graduates of the Carnegie Mellon School of The School of Architecture cultivates an individuals are nurtured to act as agents of Architecture are design-thinkers who use the intellectual climate embracing the concept change, improving both social and environmental act of making to explore, analyze, formulate, of “learning by making” to achieve design conditions nationally and abroad. fabricate, and represent new ideas about excellence. Experiential learning opportunities the built environment. Our programs and are supported by our state-of-the-art facilities. Existing at the intersection of art, design and facilities are widely recognized for providing The integrated analog/ digital studios, shop, technology, the curriculum serves as the unique learning [and research] experiences digital fabrication lab (dFab), and research foundation for the professional Bachelor of at the intersection of art, humanities, science, centers enable our students to be facile with Architecture degree. The School of Architecture and technology. We enable our students to the design tools of the future. views architecture design studios as the core of become creative and knowledgeable global the undergraduate curriculum in collaboration collaborators who improve the quality of life and At a time when the planet faces significant with six streams: Design Tools, Building the sustainability of the built environment we challenges, the expertise in our School in the Technology, Environmental Science, Architectural inhabit. areas of sustainable design, urban design, History, Critical Practice, and General Studies. computational design and critical practice, The School of Architecture at Carnegie Mellon creates a learning environment that prepares Studios serve as laboratories for analytical University takes pride in being a community our graduates to provide leadership in and creative reasoning, critical inquiry, and of students and faculty interested in positively interdisciplinary problem solving. Through most importantly, the integration of multiple changing the built environment. Graduates of strategic academic, government, industry, knowledge streams. The first three years of our the School of Architecture enter the profession and practice partnerships, we have defined studio sequence consist of required studios with design creativity, historical perspective, an innovative and collaborative pedagogy that embrace fundamentals, elaboration and social responsibility, technical excellence, and enabling our students to succeed in a variety of integration followed by two years of advanced global environmental leadership. Consistently careers. The School of Architecture’s pedagogy topic studios, enabling students to pursue one ranked in the top tier of undergraduate develops ones critical thinking skills to educate area to develop depth or multiple areas to develop professional architecture degree programs, the next generation of designers of the built breadth. The School is committed to architectural the School of Architecture offers a NAAB environment. design excellence linked to environmental, urban accredited, five-year professional Bachelor of and technological innovation that is further Architecture (BArch) degree with a studio-based The School of Architecture holds a deep informed by our renowned graduate programs. pedagogy. appreciation of its diverse community by cultivating an intellectual climate where CMU and SoArch History Carnegie Mellon University had its beginnings Carnegie Mellon offers educational programs and In the 1960s, under the direction of Paul in the Carnegie Technical Schools, founded promotes research in seven major areas: arts, Schweikher, the undergraduate program by Andrew Carnegie on November 15, 1900. sciences, humanities, engineering, public policy, was a five-year, fixed-length program. Under its initial charter, the institution intended business and computer science. Its goal is to Common during this period, it consisted of an to serve the City of Pittsburgh as a technical educate professionals, create new technologies, introductory year of basic design followed by school, offering secondary technical education foster knowledge, and promote the economic four years of architectural design. and specialized training in science and the arts. development of Pittsburgh and its region. During the 1970s and 1980s, Heads Delbert The School of Science and Technology Located on a 136-acre
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reston, a Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts
    Reston, A Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources AND Fairfax County PREPARED BY: Hanbury Preservation Consulting AND William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research Reston, A Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts W&MCAR Project No. 19-16 PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 (804) 367-2323 AND Fairfax County Department of Planning and Development 12055 Government Center Parkway Fairfax, VA 22035 (702) 324-1380 PREPARED BY: Hanbury Preservation Consulting P.O. Box 6049 Raleigh, NC 27628 (919) 828-1905 AND William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research P.O. Box 8795 Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795 (757) 221-2580 AUTHORS: Mary Ruffin Hanbury David W. Lewes FEBRUARY 8, 2021 CONTENTS Figures .......................................................................................................................................ii Tables ........................................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... v 1: Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • CRM: the Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number I Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number i Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors David G. Anderson, Ph.D. Megan Brown Department of Anthropology, Historic Preservation Grants, University of Tennessee National Park Service Gordon W. Fulton Timothy M. Davis, Ph.D. National Park Service National Historic Sites Park Historic Structures and U.S. Department of the Interior Directorate, Parks Canada Cultural Landscapes, National Park Service Cultural Resources Art Gomez, Ph.D. Intermountain Regional Elaine Jackson-Retondo, Gale A. Norton Office, National Park Service Ph.D. Secretary of the Interior Pacific West Regional Office, Michael Holleran, Ph.D. National Park Service Fran P. Mainella Department of Planning and Director, National Park Design, University of J. Lawrence Lee, Ph.D., P.E. Service Colorado, Denver Heritage Documentation Programs, Janet Snyder Matthews, Elizabeth A. Lyon, Ph.D. National Park Service Ph.D. Independent Scholar; Former Associate Director, State Historic Preservation Barbara J. Little, Ph.D. Cultural Resources Officer, Georgia Archeological Assistance Programs, Frank G. Matero, Ph.D. National Park Service Historic Preservation CRM: The Journal of Program, University of David Louter, Ph.D. Heritage Stewardship Pennsylvania Pacific West Regional Office, National Park Service Winter 2006 Moises Rosas Silva, Ph.D. ISSN 1068-4999 Instutito Nacional de Chad Randl Antropologia e Historia, Heritage Preservation Sue Waldron Mexico Service, Publisher National Park Service Jim W Steely Dennis | Konetzka | Design SWCA Environmental Daniel J. Vivian Group, LLC Consultants, Phoenix, National Register of Historic Design Arizona Places/National Historic Landmarks, Diane Vogt-O'Connor National Park Service National Archives and Staff Records Administration Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • Buried Treasures Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc
    Buried Treasures Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc. P. O. Box 536309, Orlando, FL 32853-6309 Web Site: http://www.cfgs.org Editor: Betty Jo Stockton (407) 876-1688 Email: [email protected] The Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc. meets monthly, September through May. Meetings are held at the Marks Street Senior Center on the second Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. Marks Street Senior Center is located at 99 E. Marks St, which is between Orange Ave. and Magnolia, 4 blocks north of East Colonial (Hwy 50). The Daytime Group meets year-round at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday afternoons bi-monthly (odd numbered months.) The Board meets year-round on the third Tuesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at the Orlando Public Library. All are welcome to attend. Table of contents President’s Message. 2 Thoughts from your editor. 2 Funeral Home and Newspaper Research Can Be Astonishing. 3 Carey Hand Funeral Home Records Now Online. 5 Tracking Granddad: The elusive William Ernest JA(C)QUES............................. 7 David Nathaniel Leonidas HANCOCK 1864-1901. 9 German Research Helps. 10 Family History in a Bottle . found under an outhouse!. 12 Florida U.S. Military Personnel Who Died from Hostile Action in the Korean War, 1950-1957 (Including Missing and Captured). 13 Alvin Jefferson NYE, Sr.. 15 Cluster vs. Cluster Research Approach.. 17 Florida 1885 Census Now Online. 19 State Census - 1885 Orange County, Florida. 20 Index....................................................................... 22 Contributors to this issue Cathy Burnsed Sharon Lynch A.G. Conlon George Morgan Paul Enchelmeyer Elaine Powell Carla Heller Betty Jo Stockton Lynne Knorr Buried Treasures Central FL Genealogical Society Vol 36, No 4 - Fall 2005 1 President’s Message Thoughts from your editor Since this is January, I thought I’d give you a “state For the second time in six months, I’ve been of the society” message.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoriality and Surveillance: Defensible Space and Low-Rise Public Housing Design, 1966-1976
    Territoriality and Surveillance: Defensible Space and Low-Rise Public Housing Design, 1966-1976 Patricia A. Morton Abstract This essay investigates how theories of crime prevention through environmen- tal design influenced the architecture and planning of American public housing in the 1960s and 1970s. In this period, high crime rates were strongly associated with high-rise public housing, exemplified by St. Louis’s notorious Pruitt-Igoe complex. Analyzing four federally-subsidized housing projects, I show how ideas about the environment’s effect on human behavior, exemplified by Oscar New- man’s theory of “defensible space,” motivated experiments with low-rise, high- density public housing as alternatives to crime-ridden high-rises. Newman’s theory held that correct design could solve the crime problem by increasing a sense of territoriality among residents and encouraging their surveillance of pub- lic spaces. The projects analyzed here had variable success in preventing crime and fostering community among their residents, raising questions about the effi- cacy of architecture and planning alone to produce security and constitute com- munity in public housing. By the mid-1960s, alarm over conditions in high-rise public hous- 1 1 See National Com- ing in the United States was acute. Increased crime and deteriorating mission on Urban Prob- buildings belied the promise of urban renewal and public housing pro- lems; Wright 220-39. grams to eliminate blight and improve living standards for the poor and 2 Among recent critical 2 histories of public hous- the working class. Fear of crime was widespread among residents of ing, see Bloom, Umbach, subsidized housing and was strongly associated with the architecture of and Vale; Hunt; Vale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difficult Legacy of Urban Renewal
    6 CRM JOURNAL WINTER 2006 The Difficult Legacy of Urban Renewal by Richard Longstreth Perhaps no term associated with the American landscape is fraught with more pejorative connotations than "urban renewal." Although the Federal Government program bearing that name ended over 30 years ago, the term remains in common parlance, almost always in reference to something that should not have occurred (as in, "This city suffered from widespread urban renewal") or something unfortunate that might occur ("That project would be as devastating as urban renewal"). The term evokes myriad negative references—from the wholesale destruction of neighborhoods we would rush to preserve today; to forced relocation and, with it, community dissolution, primarily affecting underprivileged minority communities; to large-scale commercial development, with cold, anonymous-looking architecture that is incompatible with the urban fabric around it; to vast, little used pedestrian plazas; to boundless accommodation of motor vehicles, including freeway net­ works destined to augment, rather than relieve, congestion almost from the time of their completion, and immense parking garages that dwarf all that is around them. Critics continue to ask how we, as a society, could have ravaged our cities and towns the way we did. The prevailing view remains that urban renewal affords only lessons in what we must avoid. The historical reality is, of course, much more complicated. While many of the stereotypical castings have some foundation in reality, our perspective also has been shaped by myths and half knowledge. The urban renewal program is conflated with that for public housing, for example. Advocates for the latter became reluctant allies of urban renewal, but the two programs had entirely different origins and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Iulillllclljfal§ ~ NEWSLETTER ~ Ifll~Ifffi1lljiffis = the SOCIETY of ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS ~ Iidieilllilllslllffis ~ ~OS· 1940 · S\\~ DECEMBER 1971 VOL
    ~~CHIT E C TU RJI("' ~ IUlillllCllJfAl§ ~ NEWSLETTER ~ IFll~Ifffi1llJiffiS = THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS ~ IIDIEilllilllSlllffiS ~ ~OS· 1940 · S\\~ DECEMBER 1971 VOL. XV NO.6 PUBLISHED SIX TIMES A YEAR BY THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS 1700 WALNUT STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19103 JAMES F. O'GORMAN, PRESIDENT EDITOR: JAMES C. MASSEY, 614 S. LEE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314. ASSOCIATE EDITOR: MRS. MARIAN CARD DONNELLY, 2175 OLIVE STREET, EUGF;NE, OREGON 97405 SAH NOTICES Diego architecture (see "Journals" and "Booklets" 1972 Annual Meeting. San Francisco, January 26-30. sections). The Trust's highest award, the Louise du Pont Crowninshield Award, was presented to Mrs. S. Henry 1973 Annual Meeting. Cambridge and London, August Edmunds, Director of the Historic Charleston Foundation. 15-27. (See announcement, page 3). 1974 Annual Meeting. New Orleans, April 3-7. The Old Sturbridge Village. The National Endowment for the SAH will meet alone in 1974, instead of holding a joint Humanities has authorized a total of $63,800 in grants for meeting with CAA in Detroit. a rna jor historical research project, Village President Domestic Tours. 1972, H. H. RICHARDSON, HIS CON­ Alexander J. Wall has announced. The funds will be used TEMPORARIES AND HIS SUCCESSORS IN BOSTON for a study of early New England vernacular architecture AND VICINITY, August 23-27, Robert B. Rettig, Chairman by Richard M. Candee, SAH, the Village's researcher in (members to receive announcement by April 15, 1972); architecture. Old Sturbridge Village will use the funds to 1973, PHILADELPHIA; 1974, UTICA, NEW YORK and continue its studies of the buildings found in New England vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    A PRESERVATION REVOLUTION: RESURRECTING FRANKLIN COURT FOR THE BICENTENNIAL Ryan Zeek Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May 2019 Acknowledgments I am greatly indebted to my advisor, Andrew Dolkart, for his guidance and feedback throughout this process. Likewise, I am similarly thankful for the input provided by my readers, Paul Bentel and Will Cook. I received inspiration and support from other faculty members as well, including Michael Adlerstein, Erica Avrami, Françoise Bollack, Chris Neville, Richard Pieper, and Norman Weiss – thank you. I am also very thankful for the support that I received from Tyler Love and Andrea Ashby at the National Park Service’s Independence National Historical Park Archives, as well as from Heather Isbell Schumacher at the University of Pennsylvania’s Architectural Archives. I would also like to thank Franklin Vagnone and Jeffrey Cohen, who kindly lent their time to answer my questions and point me in valuable directions. In addition, I would like to thank Glen Umberger, for it was during a conversation with him while I was an intern at The New York Landmarks Conservancy that the idea for this thesis first entered the world. I am also indebted to the Preservation League of New York State and the Zabar Family Scholarship for their support. Without the members of my cohort, who listened to my ideas and struggles both, and buoyed me up throughout the whole process, this thesis would not have been possible – thank you all for being some of the most incredible colleagues that a preservationist could ever want.
    [Show full text]
  • Selena Anders CV
    CURRICULUM VITAE SELENA ANDERS, PH.D. Via Ostilia, 15 Rome, Italy 00184 +39 3345824183 [email protected] Education Ph.D. 2016 “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy Department of Architecture-Theory and Practice Dissertation: Medieval Porticoes of Rome: New Methods and Technologies for Revealing Rome’s Architectural and Urban Heritage under the supervision of Antonino Saggio and Simona Salvo M. Arch 2009 University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana School of Architecture, cum laude Master’s Thesis: Welcome Center, Chicago 2016 An Architectural and Urban Design Proposal for Chicago’s Bid for the 2016 Summer Olympic Games B.A. 2005 DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois Majors: History of Art & Architecture and Anthropology, magna cum laude Minor: Italian Language & Literature Additional Training Postgraduate Archeworks, Chicago, Illinois Certificate Social and Environmental Urban Design 2006 Previous Positions Academic 2016-Present Assistant Professor School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2014-Present Co-Director and Co-Founder of HUE/ND (Historic Urban Environments Notre Dame) School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2012-2016 Professor of the Practice School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2010-2012 Visiting Assistant Professor School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2007-2009 Graduate Teaching Assistant School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2007-2009 Graduate Research Assistant School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame | Selena Anders 2019 | 1 2009-2014 Collaborator for D.H.A.R.M.A. LAB (Digital Historic Architectural Research and Material Analysis) School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2004-2005 Peer Mentor Student Support Services: Trio Program, DePaul University 2002-2005 Researcher Ronald E.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Edward Steinfeld
    CURRICULUM VITAE Edward Steinfeld June 28, 2019 Education University of Michigan, Doctorate of Architecture, December, 1972 University of Michigan, Master of Architecture, 1969 Carnegie Mellon University, Bachelor or Architecture, June 1968 Awards Nadine Carter Russell Chair in Interior Design, College of Art and Design, Louisiana State University, 2017 James Haecker Award for Distinguished Leadership in Architectural Research, Architectural Research Centers Consortium, 2015 SUNY Distinguished Professor, State University of New York, 2012 President’s Award for Excellence. University at Buffalo. 2010 Ron Mace/Design for the 21st Century Award in recognition of leadership in the field of universal design, Adaptive Environments, 2004. U.S. Patent 6 820 290 B1, Movable Bathroom Fixtures, Nov. 23, 2004 (with A. Mullick and D. Kelley) Distinguished Professor, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Spring ’03. Silver Award for Excellence in Design, Universal Bathroom Suite, Industrial Design Society of America, 2002. (with Abir Mullick and Drew Kelley) Bronze Prize, Universal Bathroom Suite, Annual Product Design for an Aging Society Competition, awarded by the American Society on Aging, 2001. (with Abir Mullick and Drew Kelley) Progressive Architecture Citation for Applied Research as Expert Advisor to Adaptive Environments Center, 1990 Best Practices in Effective Accessibility Research, Hand Anthropometrics Project, U.S. Interagency Committee on Handicapped Research, 1987 National Endowment for the Arts, Design Research Recognition Award, 1983 Progressive Architecture Award for Applied Research - New ANSI Standards Research, 1979 Gerontology Traineeships, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1968-1971 Pittsburgh Plate Glass Traveling Fellowship, 1967 1 Carnegie Scholarships, 1963-1968 Certificates and Licenses Registered Architect, New York State, 1978 Specialist in Aging Certificate, Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, 1970 Current Positions SUNY Distinguished Professor of Architecture, 2012 – Present Adjunct Professor, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft-New Haven
    Tomorrow is Here: New Haven and the Modern Movement The New Haven Preservation Trust Report prepared by Rachel D. Carley June 2008 Funded with support from the Tomorrow is Here: New Haven and the Modern Movement Published by The New Haven Preservation Trust Copyright © State of Connecticut, 2008 Project Committee Katharine Learned, President, New Haven Preservation Trust John Herzan, Preservation Services Officer, New Haven Preservation Trust Bruce Clouette Robert Grzywacz Charlotte Hitchcock Alek Juskevice Alan Plattus Christopher Wigren Author: Rachel D. Carley Editor: Penny Welbourne Rachel D. Carley is a writer, historian, and preservation consultant based in Litchfield, Connecticut. All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Rights to images in the collection of the New Haven Museum and Historical Society are granted for one- time use only. All photographs by Rachel Carley unless otherwise credited. Introduction Supported by a survey and planning grant from the History Division of the Connecticut Commission on Culture & Tourism, this overview of modern architecture and planning in New Haven is the first phase of a comprehensive project sponsored by the New Haven Preservation Trust. The intent is to investigate how and why the city became the center for one of the country’s most aggressive modern building programs of the post-World War II era, attracting a roster of internationally recognized architects and firms considered to be among the greatest leaders of the modernist movement. Although the architectural heritage of this city includes fine examples of early 20th- century contemporary design predating the war, the New Haven story relates most directly to the urban renewal years of the 1950s to 1970s and their dramatic reshaping of the city skyline during that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960S Properties in Philadelphia County Kristin M
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2011 Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County Kristin M. Hagar University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Hagar, Kristin M., "Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County" (2011). Theses (Historic Preservation). 171. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/171 Suggested Citation: Hagar, Kristin M. (2011). Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/171 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County Abstract In evaluating a stock of recent-past buildings, it is important to stay alert to the ways in which recent-past heritage is more difficult to assess, and what we might be prone to do to make it easier to assess. It is not enough to involve numerous people in the process and to articulate our method of analysis. We as preservation professionals must also consciously strive to avoid cognitive shortcuts. We must set evaluative standards and choose priorities, without simply dismissing a great portion of the built environment as “crap” or accepting self-evidence as a measure of significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Planning and Architecture for City Revitalization
    Arch. 8 Comport. /Arch. Behav., Vol. 5, no. 4, p. 305-338 (1989) Joining Old and New: Neighbourhood Planning and Architecture for City Revitalization Louis Sauer Daniel Arbour & Associates 1100 RenC-Levesque Boulevard West Montrtial, Quebec Canada H3B 4P3 Summary This paper provides an ordered account of the process of planning and designing a neighbourhood for center-city revitalization in Baltimore. It intends to make explicit design judgements in a complex architectural and planning project involving the con- flicting goals of a City government, a developer, residents and the designer. The use of existing environmental design research, of informal research done by the designer, and of two researchers assigned to different tasks is described as one of the bases for these design judgements. The paper explains the varied roles and agendas of the participants and discusses the designer's use of alternatives to mediate both among these parties and between the aesthetics of the old and the new. Finally, the paper of- fers directions on the outcome of the designer's decisions, and on those aspects of neighbourhood life that are beyond his pqwer to influence. Rdsume L'article propose un expose systCmatique du processus de planification d'un quartier destine B revitaliser le centre-ville de Baltimore. I1 propose une Cvaluation ex- plicite du projet dans un contexte architectural et de planification complexe comprenant les buts contradictoires poursuivis par les autoritks de la ville, le promoteur, les habi- tants et l'architecte. L'emploi par l'architecte des rCsultats d'autres recherches, de ceux de ses propres travaux, ainsi que le recours il deux chercheurs auxquels des tPches di- verses ont CtC attribuCes servent de base aux dkcisions relatives au projet.
    [Show full text]