DOCSLIB.ORG

Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960S Properties in Philadelphia County Kristin M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960S Properties in Philadelphia County Kristin M University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2011 Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County Kristin M. Hagar University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Hagar, Kristin M., "Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County" (2011). Theses (Historic Preservation). 171. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/171 Suggested Citation: Hagar, Kristin M. (2011). Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/171 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County Abstract In evaluating a stock of recent-past buildings, it is important to stay alert to the ways in which recent-past heritage is more difficult to assess, and what we might be prone to do to make it easier to assess. It is not enough to involve numerous people in the process and to articulate our method of analysis. We as preservation professionals must also consciously strive to avoid cognitive shortcuts. We must set evaluative standards and choose priorities, without simply dismissing a great portion of the built environment as “crap” or accepting self-evidence as a measure of significance. Complexity should not be a cause for despair. We must lead the public in a more self-reflexive view of built heritage, without getting stuck in never-ending philosophizing and debating. The field would benefit from a more systematic, methodical approach to championing pluralism in heritage and recognizing the polysemy in cultural objects, which nonetheless helps to uncover priorities of highest significance. In sum, prior to, and in addition to, preservation advocacy efforts to publicize and popularize buildings of the recent-past, preservation planning efforts must establish better methods for identifying resources and assessing their significance. In light of the issues and caveats just introduced, this study asks: what is an optimal inventory method for a municipal/county-level commission or nonprofit organization to identify priorities for preservation planning for the recent-past? Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Suggested Citation: Hagar, Kristin M. (2011). Toward a New Approach to Evaluating Significance in Recent-Past Preservation Planning with a Case Study of 1960s Properties in Philadelphia County. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/171 TOWARD A NEW APPROACH TO EVALUATING SIGNIFICANCE IN RECENT-PAST PRESERVATION PLANNING WITH A CASE STUDY OF 1960s PROPERTIES IN PHILADELPHIA COUNTY KRISTIN MARGARET HAGAR A THESIS in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2011 Advisor Aaron Wunsch Lecturer in Historic Preservation Program Chair Randall F. Mason Associate Professor For SMH & JZS ii Acknowledgements Thank you, Aaron Wunsch David B. Brownlee Joseph C. Forte David Hollenberg Benjamin Leech Randall F. Mason Frank G. Matero for your encouragement, as well as for the freedom that you gave me to pursue my thoughts. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS...........................................................................................................vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................1 1.1 Recent-Past Advocacy Initiatives........................................................................................................2 1.2 The Concept of Significance and Its Expansion..................................................................................9 1.3 Statement of the Problem..................................................................................................................15 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF ISSUES................................17 2.1 What Entails an “Optimal” Methodology for Determining Significance?..........................................18 2.1.1 Local Surveys and Historical Context Statements.....................................................................18 2.1.2 “The Epistemology of the Significance Concept”......................................................................22 2.1.3 The Social Construction of Significance....................................................................................27 2.1.4 The Privileging of Architectural Significance.............................................................................32 2.1.5 Section Summary......................................................................................................................43 2.2 How Is the Process of Determining the Significance of Recent-Past Resources Distinct?...................45 2.2.1 Review of Literature on Recent-Past Preservation Planning.......................................................45 2.2.2 Four Factors Affecting the Assessment of Significance in Recent-Past Resources........................51 2.2.3 Recent-Past Preservation Planning is a Challenge: So, Why Bother?..........................................60 2.2.4 Section Summary......................................................................................................................67 CHAPTER 3 MODERNISM IN THE 1960s.............................................................................69 3.1 Enabling Forces behind New Buildings Types and Development Patterns..........................................72 3.1.1 Federal and Municipal Programs...............................................................................................72 3.1.2 Corporate and Institutional Development................................................................................75 3.2 Modernism as an Architectural Movement........................................................................................77 3.2.1 Modernism as Discourse...........................................................................................................77 3.2.2 Major Points in Modernist Discourse in the 1960s...................................................................80 iv Table of Contents CHAPTER 3 MODERNISM IN THE 1960s (continued) 3.3 Consumerism in Architecture...........................................................................................................86 3.3.1 What is Consumerist Architecture?..........................................................................................86 3.3.2 Examples of Key Types of Consumerist Architecture of the 1960s...........................................88 3.3.3 Relationship between Modernist and Consumerist Architecture of the 1960s..........................90 CHAPTER 4 PHILADELPHIA MODERNISM INITIATIVE, SUMMER 2010...................93 4.1 A Great Project.................................................................................................................................94 4.1.1 Philadelphia Modernism Thematic Context Statement............................................................95 4.1.2 Creating the Inventory, and Evaluating for Priorities................................................................99 4.2 Reflections on the Initiative›s First Phase..........................................................................................108 CHAPTER 5 A DIFFERENT APPROACH.............................................................................117 5.1 The Criterion of Multiplicity............................................................................................................118 5.2 Sketching a Methodology.................................................................................................................122 5.3 Conclusions from the Test................................................................................................................129 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................138 BIBLIOGRAPHY..........................................................................................................................143 APPENDICES...............................................................................................................................154 A Buildings Inventory: Philadelphia County, 1959-70, Chronological Order....................................154 B Buildings Inventory: Philadelphia County, 1959-70, Alphabetical Order.......................................161 C Buildings Inventory: Selection of Inventory Processed in GIS Attributes Table..............................168 INDEX..........................................................................................................................................171
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remembering Robert Venturi, a Modern Mannerist
    The Plan Journal 4 (1): 253-259, 2019 doi: 10.15274/tpj.2019.04.01.1 Remembering Robert Venturi, a Modern Mannerist In Memoriam / THEORY Maurizio Sabini After the generation of the “founders” of the Modern Movement, very few architects had the same impact that Robert Venturi had on architecture and the way we understand it in our post-modern era. Aptly so and with a virtually universal consensus, Vincent Scully called Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture (1966) “probably the most important writing on the making of architecture since Le Corbusier’s Vers une architecture, of 1923.” 1 And I would submit that no other book has had an equally consequential impact ever since, even though Learning from Las Vegas (published by Venturi with Denise Scott Brown and Steven Izenour in 1972) has come quite close. As Aaron Betsky has observed: Like the Modernism that Venturi sought to nuance and enrich, many of the elements for which he argued were present in even the most reduced forms of high Modernism. Venturi was trying to save Modernism from its own pronouncements more than from its practices. To a large extent, he won, to the point now that we cannot think of architecture since 1966 without reference to Robert Venturi.2 253 The Plan Journal 4 (1): 253-259, 2019 - doi: 10.15274/tpj.2019.04.01.1 www.theplanjournal.com Figure 1. Robert Venturi, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture (London: The Architectural Press, with the Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1977; or. ed., New York: The Museum of Art, 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Postmodern Historicism: Identification, Ve Aluation, and Prescriptions for Preeminent Sites
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2013 Protecting Postmodern Historicism: Identification, vE aluation, and Prescriptions for Preeminent Sites Jonathan Vimr University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Vimr, Jonathan, "Protecting Postmodern Historicism: Identification, vE aluation, and Prescriptions for Preeminent Sites" (2013). Theses (Historic Preservation). 211. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/211 Suggested Citation: Vimr, Jonathan (2013). Protecting Postmodern Historicism: Identification, vE aluation, and Prescriptions for Preeminent Sites. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/211 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protecting Postmodern Historicism: Identification, vE aluation, and Prescriptions for Preeminent Sites Abstract Just as architectural history traditionally takes the form of a march of styles, so too do preservationists repeatedly campaign to save seminal works of an architectural manner several decades after its period of prominence. This is currently happening with New Brutalism and given its age and current unpopularity will likely soon befall postmodern historicism. In hopes of preventing the loss of any of the manner’s preeminent works, this study provides professionals with a framework for evaluating the significance of postmodern historicist designs in relation to one another. Through this, the limited resources required for large-scale preservation campaigns can be correctly dedicated to the most emblematic sites. Three case studies demonstrate the application of these criteria and an extended look at recent preservation campaigns provides lessons in how to best proactively preserve unpopular sites.
    [Show full text]
  • William S. Huff Papers Louis I
    William S. Huff Papers Louis I. Kahn Collection MS 139.1 University Archives State University of New York at Buffalo Note: This inventory is incomplete. Item descriptions provided by William S. Huff. Terms of Access: This collection is unprocessed. Permission to use unprocessed materials requires the approval of the University Archivist. Contact University Archives at 716-645-2991 or lib- [email protected] for more information. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Container List Box 1 ° Program: Bicentennial Symposium on the Arts, 9/10 x 59 ° Program: “The Arts the Artist and Society,” (n.d) double-sided, one page folded over ° Letter: Louis I. Kahn (LIK) to William S. Huff (wsh), 22 viii 56 ° Copy of letter: LIK to Architectural Forum, about death of F. L. Wright (n.d) ° Letterhead with LIK’s original signature ° Letterhead with LIK’s original signature ° Letterhead with LIK’s original signature ° Copy of letter: LIK to wsh, [summer 1960] ° Copy of transcript of letter: LIK to wsh, [summer 1960] ° Original LIK sketch: plan, south elevation, west elevation, ruled yellow paper ° Original LIK sketch: freehand perspective of new, final scheme, white trace ° Newspaper clipping: “Tribune-Review Announces Plans for New Building, Greensburg Tribune-Review,” 28 xi 59, p. 1 ° Newspaper clipping: “Plans for New Building,” Tribune-Review, 28 xi 59 (cont.) ° Newspaper clipping: “Plans for New Building,” Tribune-Review, 28 xi 59 (cont.) ° Newspaper clipping: “Plans for New Building,” Tribune-Review,
    [Show full text]
  • ANNE TYNG: INHABITING GEOMETRY April 15 – June 18, 2011 GRAHAM FOUNDATION
    ANNE TYNG: INHABITING GEOMETRY April 15 – June 18, 2011 GRAHAM FOUNDATION Anne Tyng, A Life Chronology By: Ingrid Schaffner, Senior Curator, Institute of Contemporary Art Philadelphia & William Whitaker, Curator and Collections Manager, The Architectural Archives, University of Pennsylvania All quotes: Anne Tyng. 1920 Bauer; classmates include Lawrence Halprin, Philip July 14: born in Jiangxi, China, to Ethel and Walworth Johnson, Eileen Pei, I.M. Pei, and William Wurster. Tyng, American Episcopal Missionaries. The fourth of five children, Tyng lives in China until 1934 with periodic furloughs in the United States. 1944 Graduates Harvard University, MA Architecture. In New York, works briefly in the offices of: Konrad Wachsmann; 1937 Van Doren, Nowland, and Schladermundt; Knoll Graduates St. Mary‘s School, Peekskill, New York. Returns Associates. to China for a family visit; continues to travel with her sister around the world via South Asia and Europe. 1945 Moves to Philadelphia to live with parents (having left as refugees of the Japanese invasion in 1939, they return to 1938 China in 1946). Employed by Stonorov and Kahn. The only Enrolls in Radcliffe College, majoring in fine arts. woman in an office of six, Tyng is involved in residential and city planning projects. 1941 1947 Takes classes at the Smith Graduate School of Architecture Joins Louis I. Kahn in his independent practice; initial and Landscape Architecture (a.k.a The Cambridge School), projects include the Weiss House (1947-50) and Genel the first women‘s school to offer architectural studies in House (1948-51), as well as the Radbill Building and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Reston, a Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts
    Reston, A Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources AND Fairfax County PREPARED BY: Hanbury Preservation Consulting AND William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research Reston, A Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts W&MCAR Project No. 19-16 PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 (804) 367-2323 AND Fairfax County Department of Planning and Development 12055 Government Center Parkway Fairfax, VA 22035 (702) 324-1380 PREPARED BY: Hanbury Preservation Consulting P.O. Box 6049 Raleigh, NC 27628 (919) 828-1905 AND William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research P.O. Box 8795 Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795 (757) 221-2580 AUTHORS: Mary Ruffin Hanbury David W. Lewes FEBRUARY 8, 2021 CONTENTS Figures .......................................................................................................................................ii Tables ........................................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... v 1: Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • CRM: the Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number I Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number i Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors David G. Anderson, Ph.D. Megan Brown Department of Anthropology, Historic Preservation Grants, University of Tennessee National Park Service Gordon W. Fulton Timothy M. Davis, Ph.D. National Park Service National Historic Sites Park Historic Structures and U.S. Department of the Interior Directorate, Parks Canada Cultural Landscapes, National Park Service Cultural Resources Art Gomez, Ph.D. Intermountain Regional Elaine Jackson-Retondo, Gale A. Norton Office, National Park Service Ph.D. Secretary of the Interior Pacific West Regional Office, Michael Holleran, Ph.D. National Park Service Fran P. Mainella Department of Planning and Director, National Park Design, University of J. Lawrence Lee, Ph.D., P.E. Service Colorado, Denver Heritage Documentation Programs, Janet Snyder Matthews, Elizabeth A. Lyon, Ph.D. National Park Service Ph.D. Independent Scholar; Former Associate Director, State Historic Preservation Barbara J. Little, Ph.D. Cultural Resources Officer, Georgia Archeological Assistance Programs, Frank G. Matero, Ph.D. National Park Service Historic Preservation CRM: The Journal of Program, University of David Louter, Ph.D. Heritage Stewardship Pennsylvania Pacific West Regional Office, National Park Service Winter 2006 Moises Rosas Silva, Ph.D. ISSN 1068-4999 Instutito Nacional de Chad Randl Antropologia e Historia, Heritage Preservation Sue Waldron Mexico Service, Publisher National Park Service Jim W Steely Dennis | Konetzka | Design SWCA Environmental Daniel J. Vivian Group, LLC Consultants, Phoenix, National Register of Historic Design Arizona Places/National Historic Landmarks, Diane Vogt-O'Connor National Park Service National Archives and Staff Records Administration Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • Buried Treasures Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc
    Buried Treasures Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc. P. O. Box 536309, Orlando, FL 32853-6309 Web Site: http://www.cfgs.org Editor: Betty Jo Stockton (407) 876-1688 Email: [email protected] The Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc. meets monthly, September through May. Meetings are held at the Marks Street Senior Center on the second Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. Marks Street Senior Center is located at 99 E. Marks St, which is between Orange Ave. and Magnolia, 4 blocks north of East Colonial (Hwy 50). The Daytime Group meets year-round at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday afternoons bi-monthly (odd numbered months.) The Board meets year-round on the third Tuesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at the Orlando Public Library. All are welcome to attend. Table of contents President’s Message. 2 Thoughts from your editor. 2 Funeral Home and Newspaper Research Can Be Astonishing. 3 Carey Hand Funeral Home Records Now Online. 5 Tracking Granddad: The elusive William Ernest JA(C)QUES............................. 7 David Nathaniel Leonidas HANCOCK 1864-1901. 9 German Research Helps. 10 Family History in a Bottle . found under an outhouse!. 12 Florida U.S. Military Personnel Who Died from Hostile Action in the Korean War, 1950-1957 (Including Missing and Captured). 13 Alvin Jefferson NYE, Sr.. 15 Cluster vs. Cluster Research Approach.. 17 Florida 1885 Census Now Online. 19 State Census - 1885 Orange County, Florida. 20 Index....................................................................... 22 Contributors to this issue Cathy Burnsed Sharon Lynch A.G. Conlon George Morgan Paul Enchelmeyer Elaine Powell Carla Heller Betty Jo Stockton Lynne Knorr Buried Treasures Central FL Genealogical Society Vol 36, No 4 - Fall 2005 1 President’s Message Thoughts from your editor Since this is January, I thought I’d give you a “state For the second time in six months, I’ve been of the society” message.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded by [New York University] at 07:16 16 August 2016 Kahn at Penn
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 07:16 16 August 2016 Kahn at Penn Louis I. Kahn is widely known as an architect of powerful buildings. But although much has been said about his buildings, almost nothing has been written about Kahn as an unconventional teacher and philosopher whose influence on his students was far-reaching. Teaching was vitally important for Kahn, and through his Master’s Class at the University of Pennsylvania, he exerted a significant effect on the future course of architectural practice and education. This book is a critical, in-depth study of Kahn’s philosophy of education and his unique pedagogy. It is the first extensive and comprehensive investi- gation of the Kahn Master’s Class as seen through the eyes of his graduate students at Penn. James F. Williamson is a Professor of Architecture at the University of Memphis and has also taught at the University of Pennsylvania, Yale, Drexel University, and Rhodes College. He holds two Master of Architecture degrees from Penn, where he was a student in Louis Kahn’s Master’s Class of 1974. He was later an Associate with Venturi, Scott Brown, and Associates. For over thirty years he practiced as a principal in his own firm in Memphis with special interests in religious and institutional architecture. Williamson was elected to the College of Fellows of the American Institute of Architects in recognition of his contributions in architectural design and education. He is the recipient of the 2014 AIA Edward S. Frey Award for career contribu- tions to religious architecture and support of the allied arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Houses Undergoing Psychoanalysis: Gehry's Residence, Venturi's Mother's House and Johnson's Glass House
    Houses Undergoing Psychoanalysis: Gehry's Residence, Venturi's Mother's House and Johnson's Glass House Ruth Palmon Bachelor of Architecture Bezalel Academy of Art and Design Jerusalem, Israel, 1997 - Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2002 © 2002 Ruth Palmon. All Rights Reserved The Author hereby grants MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: Department of Architecture May 23, 2002 Certified by: Julian Beinart Professor of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Julian Beinart Professor of Architecture MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Chairman ,Department Committee on Graduate Students OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 2 4 2002 ROTCH LIBRARIES Mark M. Jarzombek, Associate Professor of History and Architecture, Reader. Beatriz Colomina, Professor of History and Theory of Architecture, Princeton University, Reader. 2 Houses Undergoing Psychoanalysis: Johnson's Glass House, Venturi's Mother's House, and Gehry's Residence. By Ruth Palmon Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 23, 2002 in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies ABSTRACT The objective of this thesis is to explore the relationship between the self and the house. In approaching the subject, my assumptions were that the basic condition of the house-self relationship is of tension and animosity and that architectural design, following a psychoanalytical tendency to reduce tension, is used to improve this condition. When great amounts of energy and care are invested in this process, the narrative of tension and its resolution is brought to the surface through architectural drawings.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoriality and Surveillance: Defensible Space and Low-Rise Public Housing Design, 1966-1976
    Territoriality and Surveillance: Defensible Space and Low-Rise Public Housing Design, 1966-1976 Patricia A. Morton Abstract This essay investigates how theories of crime prevention through environmen- tal design influenced the architecture and planning of American public housing in the 1960s and 1970s. In this period, high crime rates were strongly associated with high-rise public housing, exemplified by St. Louis’s notorious Pruitt-Igoe complex. Analyzing four federally-subsidized housing projects, I show how ideas about the environment’s effect on human behavior, exemplified by Oscar New- man’s theory of “defensible space,” motivated experiments with low-rise, high- density public housing as alternatives to crime-ridden high-rises. Newman’s theory held that correct design could solve the crime problem by increasing a sense of territoriality among residents and encouraging their surveillance of pub- lic spaces. The projects analyzed here had variable success in preventing crime and fostering community among their residents, raising questions about the effi- cacy of architecture and planning alone to produce security and constitute com- munity in public housing. By the mid-1960s, alarm over conditions in high-rise public hous- 1 1 See National Com- ing in the United States was acute. Increased crime and deteriorating mission on Urban Prob- buildings belied the promise of urban renewal and public housing pro- lems; Wright 220-39. grams to eliminate blight and improve living standards for the poor and 2 Among recent critical 2 histories of public hous- the working class. Fear of crime was widespread among residents of ing, see Bloom, Umbach, subsidized housing and was strongly associated with the architecture of and Vale; Hunt; Vale.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Theories and Revolutions Robert Venturi
    Design Theories and Revolutions Robert Venturi Postmodern Denise the Menace of the Architecture By Gracjan Labowicz Intro Designers use many various ways to portray their ideas. What’s very special and what intrigues me the most is the fact that using different ways of communications they are able to describe a vision from their own perspective-their own sense of something in their own style. Either way: they actually describe it-write about it or produce images, that are projecting a thought into something physical (building, drawing, piece of writing). Robert Venturi, a theorist, revolutionist and a inspiring designer through his books: “Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture” 1966 and “Learning from Las Vegas” 1972 gained enormous recognition in architectural design field, but also have revolutionised ideas at the end of 20th century. Particularly the book “Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture” is described as the single most important book on a subject since Le Corbusier’s ‘Vers Une Architecture’. Robert Venturi published his first book “Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture” thanks to Museum of Modern Art Papers on Architecture in New York. It had to be done this way, otherwise Venturi couldn’t get sponsorship. Robert Venturi stressed that Architectural research is not treated in the same way as industrial or scientific research. He talks about “inverted scale of values” as part of the research system promoted by business and government. He pointed out that Architectural research is very important, because what’s left after Architects intervention is a real building, real imprint on worlds surface, that will always remain a part of landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Baunetzwoche#309
    BAUNETZ #309 Das Querformat für Architekten, 1. März 2013 WOCHE Special: „Kahn hatte eine geradezu mystische Verbindung zu Baumaterialien.“ LOUIS KAHN Frank Gehry DIE KRAFT „Oh, Kahn war unmöglich! Er überlegte es sich tausendmal anders!“ DER Robert Stern ARCHIT „Das war eine Magie. Oder die Suche EKTUR „Von dem Architekten Louis Kahn hatten wir noch nach einer Magie. Louis Kahn war ein nie gehört. Er war schon über fünfzig!“ unglaublich hartnäckiger Mensch.“ Denise Scott Brown Renzo Piano „Die Verbindung, die er zwischen Vergangenheit und Gegenwart herstellt, „Wir müssen Louis Kahns Ideen auf eine Art und Weise wie er sich von der Vergangenheit inspirieren lässt und sie für die weiterentwickeln, die unserer heutigen Zeit entspricht.“ Gegenwart neu interpretiert, da habe ich viel von ihm übernommen.“ Sou Fujimoto Moshe Safdie „Das Indian Institute of Management war ein Schlag ins Gesicht. „Er hat tatsächlich Gebäude geschaffen, die eine sehr ausgeprägte Ein Gebäude, vielleicht zweitausend Jahre alt, – vielleicht manchmal auch zu stark ausgeprägte – eigene vielleicht aber auch erst im gegenwärtigen Jahrzehnt erbaut.“ Identität haben und von ihrer Funktion unabhängig sind.“ Alejandro Aravena Herman Hertzberger „Ich bin eigentlich nur an Architekten wirklich „Die sensibelsten Menschen haben eine Antenne, und sie spüren interessiert, die an Räumen interessiert sind. den Pulsschlag des Ortes. Eben diesen Pulsschlag fand Und das hat man an ihm gespürt.“ ich bei Kahn, und das hat mich am stärksten beeindruckt.“ Peter Zumthor Balkrishna Doshi BauNETZWOCHE-Newsletter bestellen! Start 01 Editorial 02–17 Special 18 Architektenprofile 19–24T ipps 25–26 Buchrezension 27 *Modehaus der Woche Archiv DIE KRAFT DER ARCHITEKTUR LOUIS KAHN (1901–1974) Parlamentsgebäude in Dhaka, Bangladesch, 1962–83 01 Editorial 02 –17 Special 18 Architektenprofile 19–24T ipps 25–26 Buchrezension 27 *Modehaus der Woche 309 Eine Ausstellung mit dem treffenden Titel „Louis Kahn.
    [Show full text]