A Brief Historical Review of Architecture and Planning In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Brief Historical Review of Architecture and Planning In A Brief While still in London in 1681, William just below the southwest border of Historical Penn developed an idealistic conception present -day Philadelphia . Other concentrations Review of for a utopian settlement of considerable of settlers began to form at Architecture size to be placed in his newly won proprietoryUpland (now Chester ) and Kingsessing , and province in the New World. As and , although Swedish rule ended in an initial step to raise the necessary Planning in 1655 , the people remained and continued money he planned to sell 100 shares, to thrive , extending over a fair portion Philadelphia each representing 5000 acres of country of the region . By the late 1670s land. Two percent of this property English Quakers had also begun moving would be in the " Greene Country into the area, principally on the eastern Towne," or " Liberties," laid out in such side of the Delaware River , where they a manner that in its original conception established the town of Burlington (New it would have had to extend in a milewide Jersey ) in 1677 . strip fifteen miles along the Delaware Upon this primitive but surprisingly River. Here, in the " great town ," well settled area , Penn had intended to the settlers would build their principal apply the grand conception of his Holy homes, each having accessto navigable Experiment . But the original plans water. Central to the Liberties, at a convenientclearly could not fit . When his emissaries harbor, was to be a small commercialarrived to layout Philadelphia around settlement with its area (set at the nucleus of the port at Upland , they 200 acres) apportioned to owners and discovered that most of the land they renters of larger tracts. would need was already occupied , and But the settlement of the Delaware they eventually settled on the current Valley had begun over forty years previouslylocation . Centered around the small with the founding of a Swedish cove at what became known as Dock trading post at Fort Christina (now Creek , the land was held by several owners Wilmington ) in 1638. Five years later will ing to sell and had large adjoining Governor Johan Printz established a unsettled acreage inland where the post farther up the Delaware at Tinicum , liberties could be placed . Facing what was regarded as a hostile environment , [ 1] the participants in the venture pressed Although rather conservative compared Swedish and for a more urban development than with contemporary English and French Early English Work Penn had planned . Following Penn's Baroque schemes, more than any other arrival in late autumn of 1682 and a community on the eastern seaboard it series of compromises and quick improvisationswas a reflection of the ideals of the Age , the settlement began . Those of Reason. Even with the further compromises who were ready to build received land that were to follow , Philadel- along the Delaware , so that the city ph ia' s senseof order and established might assume an established appearance matrix of growth contrasted significantly ; investors who did not settle were with other communities' random given lots on land Penn bought along collection of narrow, angled streets haphazardly the Schuylkill . Construction was placed. Part of the compromise energetically pursued to the point that had involved enlargement of the city , when Penn returned to London in making it , rather than the Liberties , the 1684 he reported that some 357 houses principal settlement. Still Holme's plan, had al ready been erected . while distinctly urban in its system, The 1682 plan of the city appears to attempted to retain the character of the have been closely patterned after Richard country town Penn considered so important Newcourt 's 1666 proposal for the , with free-standing housesset rebuilding of London after the Great on ample lots, gardensand yards surrounding Fire of the same year , the chief elements each. But even this remnant of which - a grand central square at the soon succumbed to economic and social intersection of axial streets (to be called pressures. An increasing number of " High " and " Broad " ), symmetrically small, narrow houseswere erected adjoining placed subordinate squares , and a grid each other along the streets, and pattern of streets - were taken up in the before 1700 the generousblocks themselves proposal for Philadelphia by Penn ' s surveyor were subdivided by alleys where , Thomas Holme . I f not especially smaller houseswere often built . original (it also had similarities to nearby Burlington ) or the first planned city in the country (for example , New Haven in 1638 and Charleston ca . 1670 ), it was of a size (two square miles ) and scope that made it unique in the English colonies . [2] The buildings of the Swedes consisted that time , possibly reflecting the emigration of simple one - and two -room structures from london of a number of carpenters constructed from stones and logs. The no longer employed in the log cabin was introduced to the New rebuilding after the Great Fire . The majority World here by them . While it has of the rural buildings were far less achieved a certain legendary status , after advanced , dwellings acting more as a initial settlement it did not remain prominent fortress from the elements than as a in this region , and only a very few focus for the cultivation of them (for examples of these early log buildings example , the William Brinton House , survive {for example , in Delaware 1704 , near Dilworthtown ). The notable County }. The Swedes ' church es are a exception was Penn 's own country place cultural legacy , but as all extant were in Bucks County , " Pennsbury " (1692 ), erected after 1698 , they represent an which was , if the reconstruction bears al most complete assimilation of any similarities in character to the original English principles of design (see SP I 3 ). , un question ably one of the most The English initially also built wooden splendid houses in the Colonies . laid structures often following the Swedish out in a manner more I ike later Georgian model . However , the soil proved to be plantations in Virginia and South excellent for brickmaking , and eventually Carolina , it establish es a sense of order this form of masonry construction and dominance over the terrain in a became the dominant building method . manner suggestive of Penn 's attitude The early buildings were unsurprisingly toward planning and , indeed , his philos - small and simple in adornment . Aside ophy of civilization itself . from their somewhat awkward proportions , with steep roofs , and such variant details as diamond -paned windows and clustered chimneys , the general character of these houses was far more Renaissance than medieval . As such they were consider ably more advanced than most urban dwellings erected elsewhere at [3] The Georgian By the 1720s Philadelphia was emerging (CC II 7 and 8 ) and the Powel House Period as one of the Colonies ' most substantial (1765 ) (see CC II 3 ) give some indication urban areas and was clearly the of the magnificence achieved . most sophisticated . As much a center of It is interesting that no one figure comparable commerce as of science and the arts , the with William Buckland or Peter city had grown by mid -century to be Harrison appears to have been responsible the second largest in the British Empire . for the major local eighteenth - The values of the divergent and often century structures . This could , in part , conflicting elements , which are responsible be due to the guildlike Carpenters ' Company for any metropolitan growth , , which apparently control led virtually began to coalesce into two major and all building that was conducted in distinct , if interrelated , architectural the city . Robert Smith in his ecclesiastical attitudes . On the one hand , there was a work is the only master builder splendid ornate Georgian , inevitably who attained a significant reputation . reminiscent of London and frequently Gentlemen amateurs sketched out a few more sumptuous in its details than could edifices such as the State House , but the be found elsewhere in the colonies . On carpenter still determined the final form the other hand , there was the conservative of the building . and studied austerity of the buildings of the Quakers . Christ Church (see CC I 20 ) (begun 1727 ) and the Greater Meeting House (1755 ), which once stood a block to the south , illustrate the differences at an extreme . In form as well as detail , the Georgian buildings in the city were among the most sophisticated to be found along the Eastern Seaboard . So venturesome a structure as the State House (see CC I 1 ) (begun ca . 1730 ) was then unique as a civic expression , but visually not an isolated anomaly . Domestic architecture in scale and interior embellishment was often of similar pretension ; while much of it has disappeared , the Neave and Abercrombie Houses (after 1758 ) [4] Juxtaposed with the individual architecturalgreat houses were erected there , often monuments was an equally distinct as elaborate as civic and ecclesiastical sameness fostered by the simplicity design in the city . While all traces of of the Quaker architecture , in keeping these have long since disappeared along both with their religious philosophy and the Delaware , Fairmount Park has preserved the building traditions they had known many that were built along the in England . Somewhat varied , house-by - Schuylkill . Farther into the country house , but with a prevailing unity of these formal structures were the exception basic materials and small scale, Philadelphia . Rural areas began to develop an had many aspects of astraightened - important indigenous architecture essentially out , intensified , block -on - block Buck - Quaker in character , the finest inghamshire village . The unvarying lines results of which appeared in the stone of the streets , with the regularity of farmhouses that have characterized the their intersections , helped secure an impressionregion and have provided a continued of the routine , subduing individual influence on its architecture .
Recommended publications
  • 208-10 REX AVE Name of Resource: William L
    ADDRESS: 208-10 REX AVE Name of Resource: William L. Hirst-H. Louis Duhring Residence Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: Virginia, William, and Hewson Baltzell Nominator: Chestnut Hill Conservancy Staff Contact: Laura DiPasquale, [email protected] OVERVIEW: This nomination proposes to designate the property at 208-10 Rex Avenue in Chestnut Hill and list it on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. The nomination argues that the house, constructed about 1857-60, with alterations around 1893 and a substantial rear addition in 1927, satisfies Criteria for Designation A, C, and E. Under Criterion A, the nomination contends that the property has significant character as one of the early prominent suburban villas constructed in the first period of the development of the suburban character of the Chestnut Hill section of the city after the extension of the first railroad to the area. The nomination also argues that the building is significant under Criterion A for its association with architect H. Louis Duhring, who owned and lived in the house between 1919 and 1946, and under Criterion E as a representative example of Duhring’s influential architectural work. The nomination also contends that the property is significant under Criterion C as reflecting the environment of both the period of its original Italianate construction and its Arts and Crafts addition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the nomination demonstrates that the property at 208-10 Rex Avenue satisfies Criteria for Designation A, C, and E. ADDITIONAL MAPS: Figure 1: Detail of 1876 City Atlas of Philadelphia, 22nd Ward, Plate C. Source: Free Library of Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Reston, a Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts
    Reston, A Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources AND Fairfax County PREPARED BY: Hanbury Preservation Consulting AND William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research Reston, A Planned Community in Fairfax County, Virginia Reconnaissance Survey of Selected Individual Historic Resources and Eight Potential Historic Districts W&MCAR Project No. 19-16 PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23221 (804) 367-2323 AND Fairfax County Department of Planning and Development 12055 Government Center Parkway Fairfax, VA 22035 (702) 324-1380 PREPARED BY: Hanbury Preservation Consulting P.O. Box 6049 Raleigh, NC 27628 (919) 828-1905 AND William & Mary Center for Archaeological Research P.O. Box 8795 Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795 (757) 221-2580 AUTHORS: Mary Ruffin Hanbury David W. Lewes FEBRUARY 8, 2021 CONTENTS Figures .......................................................................................................................................ii Tables ........................................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... v 1: Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • CRM: the Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number I Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship Volume 3 Number i Winter 2006 Editorial Board Contributing Editors David G. Anderson, Ph.D. Megan Brown Department of Anthropology, Historic Preservation Grants, University of Tennessee National Park Service Gordon W. Fulton Timothy M. Davis, Ph.D. National Park Service National Historic Sites Park Historic Structures and U.S. Department of the Interior Directorate, Parks Canada Cultural Landscapes, National Park Service Cultural Resources Art Gomez, Ph.D. Intermountain Regional Elaine Jackson-Retondo, Gale A. Norton Office, National Park Service Ph.D. Secretary of the Interior Pacific West Regional Office, Michael Holleran, Ph.D. National Park Service Fran P. Mainella Department of Planning and Director, National Park Design, University of J. Lawrence Lee, Ph.D., P.E. Service Colorado, Denver Heritage Documentation Programs, Janet Snyder Matthews, Elizabeth A. Lyon, Ph.D. National Park Service Ph.D. Independent Scholar; Former Associate Director, State Historic Preservation Barbara J. Little, Ph.D. Cultural Resources Officer, Georgia Archeological Assistance Programs, Frank G. Matero, Ph.D. National Park Service Historic Preservation CRM: The Journal of Program, University of David Louter, Ph.D. Heritage Stewardship Pennsylvania Pacific West Regional Office, National Park Service Winter 2006 Moises Rosas Silva, Ph.D. ISSN 1068-4999 Instutito Nacional de Chad Randl Antropologia e Historia, Heritage Preservation Sue Waldron Mexico Service, Publisher National Park Service Jim W Steely Dennis | Konetzka | Design SWCA Environmental Daniel J. Vivian Group, LLC Consultants, Phoenix, National Register of Historic Design Arizona Places/National Historic Landmarks, Diane Vogt-O'Connor National Park Service National Archives and Staff Records Administration Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Code Title Date Start Time CE Hours Description Tour Format
    Tour Program Code Title Date Start Time CE Hours Description Accessibility Format ET101 Historic Boathouse Row 05/18/16 8:00 a.m. 2.00 LUs/GBCI Take an illuminating journey along Boathouse Row, a National Historic District, and tour the exteriors of 15 buildings dating from Bus and No 1861 to 1998. Get a firsthand view of a genuine labor of Preservation love. Plus, get an interior look at the University Barge Club Walking and the Undine Barge Club. Tour ET102 Good Practice: Research, Academic, and Clinical 05/18/16 9:00 a.m. 1.50 LUs/HSW/GBCI Find out how the innovative design of the 10-story Smilow Center for Translational Research drives collaboration and accelerates Bus and Yes SPaces Work Together advanced disease discoveries and treatment. Physically integrated within the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman Center for Walking Advanced Medicine and Jordan Center for Medical Education, it's built to train the next generation of Physician-scientists. Tour ET103 Longwood Gardens’ Fountain Revitalization, 05/18/16 9:00 a.m. 3.00 LUs/HSW/GBCI Take an exclusive tour of three significant historic restoration and exPansion Projects with the renowned architects and Bus and No Meadow ExPansion, and East Conservatory designers resPonsible for them. Find out how each Professional incorPorated modern systems and technologies while Walking Plaza maintaining design excellence, social integrity, sustainability, land stewardshiP and Preservation, and, of course, old-world Tour charm. Please wear closed-toe shoes and long Pants. ET104 Sustainability Initiatives and Green Building at 05/18/16 10:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Buried Treasures Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc
    Buried Treasures Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc. P. O. Box 536309, Orlando, FL 32853-6309 Web Site: http://www.cfgs.org Editor: Betty Jo Stockton (407) 876-1688 Email: [email protected] The Central Florida Genealogical Society, Inc. meets monthly, September through May. Meetings are held at the Marks Street Senior Center on the second Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. Marks Street Senior Center is located at 99 E. Marks St, which is between Orange Ave. and Magnolia, 4 blocks north of East Colonial (Hwy 50). The Daytime Group meets year-round at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday afternoons bi-monthly (odd numbered months.) The Board meets year-round on the third Tuesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at the Orlando Public Library. All are welcome to attend. Table of contents President’s Message. 2 Thoughts from your editor. 2 Funeral Home and Newspaper Research Can Be Astonishing. 3 Carey Hand Funeral Home Records Now Online. 5 Tracking Granddad: The elusive William Ernest JA(C)QUES............................. 7 David Nathaniel Leonidas HANCOCK 1864-1901. 9 German Research Helps. 10 Family History in a Bottle . found under an outhouse!. 12 Florida U.S. Military Personnel Who Died from Hostile Action in the Korean War, 1950-1957 (Including Missing and Captured). 13 Alvin Jefferson NYE, Sr.. 15 Cluster vs. Cluster Research Approach.. 17 Florida 1885 Census Now Online. 19 State Census - 1885 Orange County, Florida. 20 Index....................................................................... 22 Contributors to this issue Cathy Burnsed Sharon Lynch A.G. Conlon George Morgan Paul Enchelmeyer Elaine Powell Carla Heller Betty Jo Stockton Lynne Knorr Buried Treasures Central FL Genealogical Society Vol 36, No 4 - Fall 2005 1 President’s Message Thoughts from your editor Since this is January, I thought I’d give you a “state For the second time in six months, I’ve been of the society” message.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoriality and Surveillance: Defensible Space and Low-Rise Public Housing Design, 1966-1976
    Territoriality and Surveillance: Defensible Space and Low-Rise Public Housing Design, 1966-1976 Patricia A. Morton Abstract This essay investigates how theories of crime prevention through environmen- tal design influenced the architecture and planning of American public housing in the 1960s and 1970s. In this period, high crime rates were strongly associated with high-rise public housing, exemplified by St. Louis’s notorious Pruitt-Igoe complex. Analyzing four federally-subsidized housing projects, I show how ideas about the environment’s effect on human behavior, exemplified by Oscar New- man’s theory of “defensible space,” motivated experiments with low-rise, high- density public housing as alternatives to crime-ridden high-rises. Newman’s theory held that correct design could solve the crime problem by increasing a sense of territoriality among residents and encouraging their surveillance of pub- lic spaces. The projects analyzed here had variable success in preventing crime and fostering community among their residents, raising questions about the effi- cacy of architecture and planning alone to produce security and constitute com- munity in public housing. By the mid-1960s, alarm over conditions in high-rise public hous- 1 1 See National Com- ing in the United States was acute. Increased crime and deteriorating mission on Urban Prob- buildings belied the promise of urban renewal and public housing pro- lems; Wright 220-39. grams to eliminate blight and improve living standards for the poor and 2 Among recent critical 2 histories of public hous- the working class. Fear of crime was widespread among residents of ing, see Bloom, Umbach, subsidized housing and was strongly associated with the architecture of and Vale; Hunt; Vale.
    [Show full text]
  • FREE LIBRARY of PHILADELPHIA, CENTRAL LIBRARY HABS PA-6749 1901 Vine Street PA-6749 Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania
    FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA, CENTRAL LIBRARY HABS PA-6749 1901 Vine Street PA-6749 Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA. CENTRAL LIBRARY HABS NO. PA-6749 Location: 1901Vine Street, bounded by 19xth , 20>thUi and Wood Streets, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. The library faces south onto Logan Circle and the Benjamin Franklin Parkway that runs at a diagonal from Vine Street. Owner: The library is part of the Free Library of Philadelphia system and is owned by the City of Philadelphia. Present Use: Central library Significance: The Central Library, built between 1917 and 1927, was designed by well-known architect Horace Trumbauer and his associate Julian Abele and it is the flagship of the Philadelphia Free Library system. Favoring French architecture of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, they based their design on the twin Ministere de la Marine and Hotel de Crillon on Place de la Concorde in Paris. The library was the first structure to be erected along the city's new parkway, which was likewise inspired by Parisian precedents, namely the Champs d'Elysee. It too was the work of Horace Trumbauer, with architects Paul Cret, Clarence Zantzinger, and French planner Jacques Greber. Intended as a grand boulevard linking City Hall to the Philadelphia Museum of Art and Fairmount Park, it was later named for Benjamin Franklin. The parkway and the civic structures and monuments that line it were a product of Philadelphia's City Beautiful movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination of Historic Building, Structure, Site, Or Object
    NOMINATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OR OBJECT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with a Board of Revision of Taxes address) Street address: 208-210 Rex Avenue Postal code: 19118 Councilmanic District: 8th 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name: William L. Hirst Residence; H. Louis Duhring Residence Common Name: 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair poor ruins Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use: 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED 6. DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED 7. SIGNIFICANCE Period of Significance (from year to year): c.1857-1946 Date(s) of construction and/or alteration: c.1857-60; c.1893, 1927 Architect, engineer, and/or designer: H. Louis Duhring (1927) Builder, contractor, and/or artisan: Original owner: William L. Hirst Other significant persons: CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic resource satisfies the following criteria for designation (check all that apply): (a) Has significant character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, Commonwealth or Nation or is associated with the life of a person significant in the past; or, (b) Is associated with an event of importance to the history of the City, Commonwealth or Nation; or, (c) Reflects the environment in an era characterized by a
    [Show full text]
  • The Difficult Legacy of Urban Renewal
    6 CRM JOURNAL WINTER 2006 The Difficult Legacy of Urban Renewal by Richard Longstreth Perhaps no term associated with the American landscape is fraught with more pejorative connotations than "urban renewal." Although the Federal Government program bearing that name ended over 30 years ago, the term remains in common parlance, almost always in reference to something that should not have occurred (as in, "This city suffered from widespread urban renewal") or something unfortunate that might occur ("That project would be as devastating as urban renewal"). The term evokes myriad negative references—from the wholesale destruction of neighborhoods we would rush to preserve today; to forced relocation and, with it, community dissolution, primarily affecting underprivileged minority communities; to large-scale commercial development, with cold, anonymous-looking architecture that is incompatible with the urban fabric around it; to vast, little used pedestrian plazas; to boundless accommodation of motor vehicles, including freeway net­ works destined to augment, rather than relieve, congestion almost from the time of their completion, and immense parking garages that dwarf all that is around them. Critics continue to ask how we, as a society, could have ravaged our cities and towns the way we did. The prevailing view remains that urban renewal affords only lessons in what we must avoid. The historical reality is, of course, much more complicated. While many of the stereotypical castings have some foundation in reality, our perspective also has been shaped by myths and half knowledge. The urban renewal program is conflated with that for public housing, for example. Advocates for the latter became reluctant allies of urban renewal, but the two programs had entirely different origins and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Iulillllclljfal§ ~ NEWSLETTER ~ Ifll~Ifffi1lljiffis = the SOCIETY of ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS ~ Iidieilllilllslllffis ~ ~OS· 1940 · S\\~ DECEMBER 1971 VOL
    ~~CHIT E C TU RJI("' ~ IUlillllCllJfAl§ ~ NEWSLETTER ~ IFll~Ifffi1llJiffiS = THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS ~ IIDIEilllilllSlllffiS ~ ~OS· 1940 · S\\~ DECEMBER 1971 VOL. XV NO.6 PUBLISHED SIX TIMES A YEAR BY THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS 1700 WALNUT STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19103 JAMES F. O'GORMAN, PRESIDENT EDITOR: JAMES C. MASSEY, 614 S. LEE STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314. ASSOCIATE EDITOR: MRS. MARIAN CARD DONNELLY, 2175 OLIVE STREET, EUGF;NE, OREGON 97405 SAH NOTICES Diego architecture (see "Journals" and "Booklets" 1972 Annual Meeting. San Francisco, January 26-30. sections). The Trust's highest award, the Louise du Pont Crowninshield Award, was presented to Mrs. S. Henry 1973 Annual Meeting. Cambridge and London, August Edmunds, Director of the Historic Charleston Foundation. 15-27. (See announcement, page 3). 1974 Annual Meeting. New Orleans, April 3-7. The Old Sturbridge Village. The National Endowment for the SAH will meet alone in 1974, instead of holding a joint Humanities has authorized a total of $63,800 in grants for meeting with CAA in Detroit. a rna jor historical research project, Village President Domestic Tours. 1972, H. H. RICHARDSON, HIS CON­ Alexander J. Wall has announced. The funds will be used TEMPORARIES AND HIS SUCCESSORS IN BOSTON for a study of early New England vernacular architecture AND VICINITY, August 23-27, Robert B. Rettig, Chairman by Richard M. Candee, SAH, the Village's researcher in (members to receive announcement by April 15, 1972); architecture. Old Sturbridge Village will use the funds to 1973, PHILADELPHIA; 1974, UTICA, NEW YORK and continue its studies of the buildings found in New England vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    A PRESERVATION REVOLUTION: RESURRECTING FRANKLIN COURT FOR THE BICENTENNIAL Ryan Zeek Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May 2019 Acknowledgments I am greatly indebted to my advisor, Andrew Dolkart, for his guidance and feedback throughout this process. Likewise, I am similarly thankful for the input provided by my readers, Paul Bentel and Will Cook. I received inspiration and support from other faculty members as well, including Michael Adlerstein, Erica Avrami, Françoise Bollack, Chris Neville, Richard Pieper, and Norman Weiss – thank you. I am also very thankful for the support that I received from Tyler Love and Andrea Ashby at the National Park Service’s Independence National Historical Park Archives, as well as from Heather Isbell Schumacher at the University of Pennsylvania’s Architectural Archives. I would also like to thank Franklin Vagnone and Jeffrey Cohen, who kindly lent their time to answer my questions and point me in valuable directions. In addition, I would like to thank Glen Umberger, for it was during a conversation with him while I was an intern at The New York Landmarks Conservancy that the idea for this thesis first entered the world. I am also indebted to the Preservation League of New York State and the Zabar Family Scholarship for their support. Without the members of my cohort, who listened to my ideas and struggles both, and buoyed me up throughout the whole process, this thesis would not have been possible – thank you all for being some of the most incredible colleagues that a preservationist could ever want.
    [Show full text]
  • Selena Anders CV
    CURRICULUM VITAE SELENA ANDERS, PH.D. Via Ostilia, 15 Rome, Italy 00184 +39 3345824183 [email protected] Education Ph.D. 2016 “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy Department of Architecture-Theory and Practice Dissertation: Medieval Porticoes of Rome: New Methods and Technologies for Revealing Rome’s Architectural and Urban Heritage under the supervision of Antonino Saggio and Simona Salvo M. Arch 2009 University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana School of Architecture, cum laude Master’s Thesis: Welcome Center, Chicago 2016 An Architectural and Urban Design Proposal for Chicago’s Bid for the 2016 Summer Olympic Games B.A. 2005 DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois Majors: History of Art & Architecture and Anthropology, magna cum laude Minor: Italian Language & Literature Additional Training Postgraduate Archeworks, Chicago, Illinois Certificate Social and Environmental Urban Design 2006 Previous Positions Academic 2016-Present Assistant Professor School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2014-Present Co-Director and Co-Founder of HUE/ND (Historic Urban Environments Notre Dame) School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2012-2016 Professor of the Practice School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2010-2012 Visiting Assistant Professor School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2007-2009 Graduate Teaching Assistant School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2007-2009 Graduate Research Assistant School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame | Selena Anders 2019 | 1 2009-2014 Collaborator for D.H.A.R.M.A. LAB (Digital Historic Architectural Research and Material Analysis) School of Architecture, University of Notre Dame 2004-2005 Peer Mentor Student Support Services: Trio Program, DePaul University 2002-2005 Researcher Ronald E.
    [Show full text]