Deutsche Bahn AR 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deutsche Bahn AR 2004 Annual Report 2004 Deutsche Bahn AGDeutsche Bahn Annual Report 2004 21,5 mm 216 mm We present the economic development according to German GAAP (HGB) in addition to the audited consolidated financial statements according to IFRS. The EBITDA is a reasonable figure to illustrate the economic progress since the start of the German Rail Reform. In 2001 we fore- casted the return to positive operating income figures for the financial year 2004. We were able to realize that despite tough market and competition conditions. Revenues EBITDA Operating income Gross capital in € million in € million after interest expenditures in € million in € million 28,228 23,963 3,092 3,509 –172 253 9,121 7, 232 25,000 4,000 250 10,000 200 20,000 150 8,000 3,000 100 15,000 6,000 50 2,000 0 10,000 4,000 – 50 1,000 5,000 – 100 2,000 – 150 – 200 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 to 2004: 2003 to 2004: 2003 to 2004: 2003 to 2004: –15.1% +13.5% € + 425 million –20.7% German German Key figures GAAP GAAP Change in € million 20041) 2003 in % Revenues 23,963 28,228 – 15.1 Revenues – comparable 23,963 23,029 + 4.1 Income before taxes 372 – 133 – Income after taxes 280 – 245 – Total assets 46,348 47,647 – 2.7 Fixed assets 41,530 41,362 + 0.4 Equity 5,286 5,076 + 4.1 Interest-bearing debt 14,020 12,731 + 10.1 EBITDA 3,509 3,092 + 13.5 EBIT 951 465 + 104.5 Operating income after interest 253 – 172 – Cash flow before taxes 3,011 2,600 + 15.8 Gross capital expenditures 7,232 9,121 – 20.7 Net capital expenditures 2) 3,244 4,013 – 19.2 Employees (as of Dec 31) 225,512 242,759 – 7.1 1) Pro forma figures Change 2) Gross capital expendi- Performance figures 2004 2003 in % tures less investment grants from third parties Passenger Transport 3) Passenger kilometers Passengers in million 1,694.9 1,681.7 + 0.8 (pkm): product of number 3) Passenger kilometers in million pkm 70,260 69,534 + 1.0 of passengers and Train kilometers in million train-path km 4) 717.7 722.8 – 0.7 mean travel distance 4) Train-path kilometers: Freight Transport 5) driving performance Freight carried in million t 283.6 282.3 + 0.5 in km of trains on rail 6) Ton kilometers in million tkm 83,982 79,864 + 5.2 5) Please note: all ton fig- Mean transport distance in km 296.1 282.9 + 4.7 ures represent metric tons Train kilometers in million train-path km 4) 205.1 204.1 + 0.5 (1,000 kg = 2,200 lbs.) 6) Ton kilometers (tkm): prod- 7) Number of passenger stations 5,697 5,665 + 0.6 uct of freight carried and Train kilometers on track infrastructure in million train-path km 4) 1,000.7 988.2 + 1.3 mean transport distance thereof non-Group companies in million train-path km 4) (88.0) (70.4) + 25.0 7) Thereof in 2004: 5,477 as- Length of line operated in km 34,718 35,593 – 2.5 signed to the Group Pas- senger Stations division 185 mm Successful Rail Reform Rail passenger transport performance in billion pkm +12.0% 62.7 64.5 70.3 71.0 71.6 71.9 72.8 74.4 74.5 69.8 69.5 70.3 120 100 80 60 40 20 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Rail freight transport performance in billion tkm +30.1% 64.5 70.6 69.5 67.9 72.6 73.3 71.5 80.6 80.3 78.0 79.9 84.0 120 100 80 60 40 20 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Productivity in 1,000 ptkm per employee +187% 328 413 468 533 603 656 699 798 840 833 862 941 1, 200 1,000 800 600 400 200 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 EBITDA before special burden compensation in € billion € +5.52 billion –2.01 –1.52 –0.91 –0.45 0.04 0.43 1.26 1.43 2.02 3.09 3.51 3 2 1 0 –1 –2 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 er Operating income after interest in € billion € +3.28 billion 0.23 0.25 0.33 0.27 0.17 –0.09 0.20 –0.20 –0.45 –0.17 0.25 –3.03 –2.67 –2.24 –2.09 –1.79 –1.70 –1.03 –1.04 –0.90 –0.17 0.25 after special burden compensation 1 ns 0 –1 d- before special burden compensation d –2 e –3 s- s- 19949961995 1997 1996 1998 1997 1999 1998 19992000 20002001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 216 mm 21,5 mm DB AG – management holding company Vertically integrated Group structure 24.0 Portfolio focused on core business € billion Group revenues Excellent ratings: Aa1/AA Economic development according to German GAAP p. 46 Group Management Report according to IFRS p. 66 #1 in European rail passenger transport #1 in European public urban transport 11. 2 #1 in German bus transport € billion revenues in Passenger Transport Passenger Transport p.128 #1 in European rail freight transport #1 in European land transport 11. 6 #3 in sea freight € billion revenues in #5 in air freight Transport and Logistics Transport and Logistics p.136 Attractive stations Largest rail track infrastructure in Europe 290 Functioning competition on the rails non-Group railways take advantage of the open access to our infrastructure Passenger Stations p.142 Track Infrastructure p.148 Services for internal and 31,500 external customers employees in the Services division Services p.156 185 mm Contents 2Chairman’s Letter 6 The Management Board 8 Financial Communication 11 Rating 12 Deutsche Bahn Bond Issues 13 Corporate Governance 17 DB – Mobility, Transport and Logistics 44 Report of the Management Board 46 Economic Development According to German GAAP 66 Group Management Report According to IFRS 116 Employees 122 Environmental Protection 126Group Divisions 128 Passenger Transport 136Transport and Logistics 14 2 Passenger Stations 14 8Track Infrastructure 156 Services 160 Rolling Stock and Stations 166Consolidated Financial Statements 168Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements According to German GAAP 208 Consolidated Financial Statements According to IFRS 283 Additional Information 287 Major Subsidiaries 290 The Boards of Deutsche Bahn AG 294 Report of the Supervisory Board 298 Deutsche Bahn Advisory Board 300 Glossary 302 Events in 2004 304 Imprint Five-Year Summary 1 Chairman’s Letter Hartmut Mehdorn CEO and Chairman of the Management Board of Deutsche Bahn AG Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, The Deutsche Bahn Group saw a good performance in the 2004 financial year. In light of the challenging economic environment, this was not a matter of course. Our German home market in particular continued to show weak economic development. In addition, the fierce competition between individual rail companies and other modes of transport has intensified. Cost optimizations and a constantly increasing level of efficiency are therefore entrepreneurial necessities and normal business also for us. The fact that we have clearly achieved our defined goals, mainly the return to positive operating income, is primarily due to the noticeable improvements in our service and quality. These have satisfied our customers in various business units. Additionally we have reinforced our restructuring efforts where necessary. This impacted revenues and earn- 2 Deutsche Bahn Group | Annual Report 2004 Chairman’s Letter ings with a four percent growth in revenues in the core business to around 24 billion euro and positive operating income after interest of 253 million euro, representing an im- provement of 425 million euro compared to the previous year. Even though our original forecasts were given against the background of better economic expectations, we have achieved the income forecasts that we had announced in spring 2001 upon the launch of our “DB Campaign” and the related capital expenditure and modernization programs. The EBITDA adjusted for special burden compensations which were paid through 2002, has become the relevant figure to measure our operating improvements since the start of the German Rail Reform. Since the founding of Deutsche Bahn AG, we have improved EBITDA by more than 500 million euro per year and today achieve an EBITDA 5.5 billion euro higher than that of 1994. In addition to the growth in rail passenger and rail freight transport, this is the best argument in favor of our model of an entrepreneurial-driven, vertically integrated railroad. While the aforementioned figures refer to our previous accounting standards according to German GAAP (HGB), this includes Consolidated Financial Statements for the first time according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). We have proactively opted for the transition to international accounting standards, as our corporate manage- ment approach is closely linked to capital market standards. The IFRS will be established as a mandatory standard for companies oriented towards the capital market in the coming years via corresponding EU regulations. The strong increase in earnings compared to the previous year is also shown under IFRS, and is even more pronounced than under HGB. The key operating figures reveal the mostly positive performance of our business units: due to a considerably enhanced on-time performance, well-accepted price offers and an improvement in service. The Long-Distance Transport business unit thereby managed to achieve a turnaround. Together with the Regional and Urban Transport business units, we were able to increase rail passenger transport performance by more than one percent and thus gain market shares in a once again shrinking overall market.
Recommended publications
  • Domestic Train Reservation Fees
    Domestic Train Reservation Fees Updated: 17/11/2016 Please note that the fees listed are applicable for rail travel agents. Prices may differ when trains are booked at the station. Not all trains are bookable online or via a rail travel agent, therefore, reservations may need to be booked locally at the station. Prices given are indicative only and are subject to change, please double-check prices at the time of booking. Reservation Fees Country Train Type Reservation Type Additional Information 1st Class 2nd Class Austria ÖBB Railjet Trains Optional € 3,60 € 3,60 Bosnia-Herzegovina Regional Trains Mandatory € 1,50 € 1,50 ICN Zagreb - Split Mandatory € 3,60 € 3,60 The currency of Croatia is the Croatian kuna (HRK). Croatia IC Zagreb - Rijeka/Osijek/Cakovec Optional € 3,60 € 3,60 The currency of Croatia is the Croatian kuna (HRK). IC/EC (domestic journeys) Recommended € 3,60 € 3,60 The currency of the Czech Republic is the Czech koruna (CZK). Czech Republic The currency of the Czech Republic is the Czech koruna (CZK). Reservations can be made SC SuperCity Mandatory approx. € 8 approx. € 8 at https://www.cd.cz/eshop, select “supplementary services, reservation”. Denmark InterCity/InterCity Lyn Recommended € 3,00 € 3,00 The currency of Denmark is the Danish krone (DKK). InterCity Recommended € 27,00 € 21,00 Prices depend on distance. Finland Pendolino Recommended € 11,00 € 9,00 Prices depend on distance. InterCités Mandatory € 9,00 - € 18,00 € 9,00 - € 18,00 Reservation types depend on train. InterCités Recommended € 3,60 € 3,60 Reservation types depend on train. France InterCités de Nuit Mandatory € 9,00 - € 25,00 € 9,00 - € 25,01 Prices can be seasonal and vary according to the type of accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit TR0003 (REV 10/98) at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-17-2969 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE A Comparative Analysis of High Speed Rail Station Development into Destination and/or Multi-use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon February 2017 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Ph.D. / Deike Peters, Ph.D. MTI Report 12-75 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business 3762 San José State University 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER San José, CA 95192-0219 65A0499 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Final Report Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Information MS-42, PO Box 942873 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT As a burgeoning literature on high-speed rail development indicates, good station-area planning is a very important prerequisite for the eventual successful operation of a high-speed rail station; it can also trigger opportunities for economic development in the station area and the station-city. At the same time, “on the ground” experiences from international examples of high-speed rail stations can provide valuable lessons for the California high-speed rail system in general, and the San Jose Diridon station in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel Freiburg
    ADD-ON Freiburg- Basel Manual Handbuch_120x178_Freiburg-Basel_de_2019.indd 1 12.10.18 11:07 Freiburg-Basel Developed by: Pad-Labs GmbH Manual: Pad-Labs GmbH, Aerosoft Freiburg- Basel Manual Copyright: © 2018 / Aerosoft GmbH Airport Paderborn/Lippstadt D-33142 Büren, Germany Tel: +49 (0) 29 55 7603-10 Fax: +49 (0) 29 55 7603-33 Add-on for E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aerosoft.com All trademarks and brand names are trademarks or registered of their Train Simulator 2019 respective owners. All rights reserved. 2 3 Aerosoft GmbH 2018 Freiburg-Basel Content Credits .....................................................................19 Copyrights ...............................................................20 Starting Off ...............................................................6 Minimum System Requirements ............................................. 6 Installation ............................................................................. 6 Settings in Train Simulator ..................................................... 7 Support ................................................................................. 7 About Freiburg-Basel ...............................................8 The Route .............................................................................. 8 Stations: ..................................................................... 8 Rolling Stock ......................................................................... 9 Class 189 ................................................................... 9
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Primeras Paginas Rha5
    RHA, Vol. 5, Núm. 5 (2007), 15-28 ISSN 1697-3305 GERMAN STATE ACTION AND RAILWAY POLICY DURING THE 20TH CENTURY Ralf Roth* Recibido: 3 Junio 2007 / Revisado: 4 Septiembre 2007 / Aceptado: 1 Octubre 2007 INTRODUCTION and Württemberg in the 1840s. Prussia, which The question of state and railway is one of the next to Austria was the largest state of the German most important in Germany’s history. Many scho- Confederation, favoured a mixed system from the lars have contributed to this topic. New research 1840s onwards. At that time, the Prussian state shed light on this field in the last decade. Initiated planned a railway for the eastern –and economi- and financed by the Deutsche Bahn AG (German cally underdeveloped– parts of the country. The Railway Company) and the Gesellschaft für Unter - Ostbahn (Eastern Railway) was planned to initiate nehmensgeschichte (Society for Entrepreneurial economic improvement of this part of the mo - History), an extensive research project took place narchy in order to counterbalance the powerful, from 1994 to 1998. The outcome of this project wealthy and politically liberal departments in the was summarised in a study by Lothar Gall and West. But the state itself did not have the money Manfred Pohl, Die Eisenbahn in Deutschland (The for railway construction at that time. On the one Railway in Germany), which appeared in 19991. hand, debts from the Napoleonic Wars still burde- The perspective of the present article follows the ned the state budget. On the other hand, the argumentation of Gall and Poll’s study of the long potential private investors, wealthy merchants and and winding road of Germany’s state railway.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauptbericht AP 4G
    AP 4G Schaffhausen - Hauptbericht Agglomerationsprogramm Schaffhausen 4. Generation (2939) Hauptbericht - Teil 1/4 Mai 2021 1 AP 4G Schaffhausen - Hauptbericht Impressum Agglomerationsprogramm Schaffhausen 4. Generation (2939) - Hauptbericht 1/4 Verein Agglomeration Schaffhausen (VAS) Beckenstube 7 CH-8200 Schaffhausen Leitung Agglomerationsprogramm Tiefbau Schaffhausen (TSH) Schweizersbildstrasse 69 CH-8200 Schaffhausen [email protected] Dino Giuliani (Dienststellenleiter, Kantonsingenieur) Dr. Christian Ordon (Leiter Agglomerationsprogramme) Planermandat: EBP Schweiz AG, Zürich Fabienne Perret (Projektleitung EBP) Dr. Reto Nebel (stellvertretende Projektleitung EBP) Dr. Samuel Graf Benjamin Stadler Schaffhausen, Mai 2021 Hinweis: Das Agglomerationsprogramm Schaffhausen 4 Generation setzt sich aus den vier Teilen «Hauptbe- richt», «Kartenband», «Massnahmen» und «Kurzfassung Hauptbericht» zusammen. Aus Gründen der besseren Lesbarkeit wird auf die gleichzeitige Verwendung männlicher und weiblicher Sprach- formen verzichtet. Sämtliche Personenbezeichnungen gelten für beide Geschlechter. 2 AP 4G Schaffhausen - Hauptbericht Abkürzungsverzeichnis AGI Amt für Geoinformation des Kantons Schaffhausen AP Agglomerationsprogramm ARE Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung ASTRA Bundesamt für Strassen BAV Bundesamt für Verkehr BeSA Beitragsberechtigte Städte und Agglomerationen BFS Bundesamt für Statistik BSM Black Spot Management BVWP Bundesverkehrswegeplan B+R Bike-and-Ride DB Deutsche Bahn DTV Durchschnittlicher Tagesverkehr EKZ Einkaufszentrum ESP Entwicklungsschwerpunkt
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2
    Case Study : Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Co rruption Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2 Authors: Katja Geißler, Hertie School of Governance Florin Nita, Hertie School of Governance This case study was written at the Hertie School of Governanc e for students of public po licy Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 3 Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Corru ption Kontakt: Anna Peters Projektmanager Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen/Corporate Soc ial Responsibility Bertelsmann Stiftung Telefon 05241 81 -81 401 Fax 05241 81 -681 246 E-Mail anna .peters @bertelsmann.de Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 4 Inhalt Ex ecu tive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 5 Deutsche Bahn AG and its Corporate History ................................ ............................... 6 A New Manager in DB ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 7 DB’s Successful Take Off ................................ ................................ ............................. 8 How the Corruption Scandal Came all About ................................ ................................ 9 Role of Civil Society: Transparency International ................................ ........................ 11 Cooperation between Transparency International and Deutsche Bahn AG .................. 12 What is Corruption? ................................ ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Streckenkarte Regionalverkehr Rheinland-Pfalz / Saarland
    Streckenkarte Regionalverkehr Rheinland-Pfalz / Saarland Niederschelden Siegen Mudersbach VGWS FreusburgBrachbach Siedlung Eiserfeld (Sieg) Niederschelden Nord Köln ten: Kirchen or Betzdorf w Au (Sieg) ir ant Geilhausen Hohegrete Etzbach Köln GrünebacherhütteGrünebachSassenroth OrtKönigsstollenHerdorf Dillenburg agen – w Breitscheidt WissenNiederhövels (Sieg)Scheuerfeld Alsdorf Sie fr Schutzbach “ Bonn Hbf Bonn Kloster Marienthal Niederdreisbach ehr Köln Biersdorf Bahnhof verk Obererbach Biersdorf Ort Bonn-Bad Godesberg Daaden 0180 t6 „Na 99h 66 33* Altenkirchen (Ww) or Bonn-Mehlem Stichw /Anruf Rolandseck Unkel Büdingen (Ww) Hattert Oberwinter Ingelbach Enspel /Anruf aus dem Festnetz, HachenburgUnnau-Korb Bad BodendorfRemagen Erpel (Rhein) *20 ct Ahrweiler Markt Heimersheim Rotenhain Bad Neuenahr Walporzheim Linz (Rhein) Ahrweiler bei Mobilfunk max. 60 ct Nistertal-Bad MarienbergLangenhahn VRS Dernau Rech Leubsdorf (Rhein) Westerburg Willmenrod Mayschoß Sinzig Berzhahn Altenahr Bad Hönningen Wilsenroth Kreuzberg (Ahr) Bad Breisig Rheinbrohl Siershahn Frickhofen Euskirchen Ahrbrück Wirges Niederzeuzheim Brohl Leutesdorf NeuwiedEngers Dernbach Hadamar Köln MontabaurGoldhausenGirod Steinefrenz Niederhadamar Namedy Elz Andernach Vallendar Weißenthurm Urmitz Rheinbrücke Staffel Miesenheim Dreikirchen Elz Süd Plaidt Niedererbach Jünkerath Mendig KO-Lützel Limburg (Lahn) KO-Ehrenbreitstein Diez Ost Gießen UrmitzKO-Stadtmitte Thür Kruft Diez Eschhofen Lissendorf Kottenheim KO-Güls Niederlahnstein Lindenholzhausen Winningen (Mosel) BalduinsteinFachingen
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Nr. 4 2019
    Karlsruhe–Basel im Fokus Informationen zur Ausbau- und Neubaustrecke Karlsruhe–Basel Nr. 4 | Dezember 2019 Editorial An fünf Tagen rund um die Uhr: Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Arbeiten zur Inbetriebnahme zum Jahresende möchte ich den Fokus auf einige der westlichen Gleistrasse zurückliegende Meilen­ steine legen, gleichzeitig aber auch einen Blick in die Zukunft wer­ fen. Die Gleise der Neubaustrecke zwischen dem Abzweig Bashaide und Ötigheim sind fast vollständig verlegt und für den Tunnel Rastatt haben wir einen Plan zum Weiter­ bau erarbeitet. Im Juli war offizieller Bau­ start für Müllheim und Auggen, während in Haltingen und Weil am Rhein Anfang November bereits das erste Gleis der neuen westlichen Gleistrasse in Betrieb ging. Im November fand außerdem ein Erörterungs­ termin für die Güterumfahrung zwischen Kenzingen und Müllheim im Planfeststel­ lungsabschnitt 8.1 Riegel–March statt. 2020 gehen die umfangreichen Bau arbeiten Die Sperrpausen wurden intensiv genutzt: Tagesanbruch um 7 Uhr auf der Baustelle in Haltingen an der EÜ Nordwest- weiter, die ersten Verfahren zur Beteiligung umfahrung. der Öffentlichkeit im Streckenabschnitt Appenweier– Kenzingen finden statt und n Weil am Rhein und Haltingen ist die neue eines Krans, der bis zu 400 Tonnen Gewicht im Abschnitt Kenzingen–Müllheim werden I westliche Gleistrasse in Fahrtrichtung Ba­ aufnehmen kann, ausgehoben. Im Bereich der Planunter lagen offengelegt. Wir werden au­ sel am 5. November 2019 in Betrieb gegangen. EÜ Nordwestumfahrung bis zum nördlichen ßerdem den Dialog in der Region fortführen Zuvor waren noch einmal umfangreiche Bau­ Betontrog wurden außerdem die Gleise der und unsere Informationsangebote vor Ort arbeiten notwendig. Während einer fünftägi­ Rheintalbahn ausgebaut. Anschließend konn­ weiter ausbauen.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified Xxix S E C\E T
    A. Fighter; Total claims against enemy aircraft during the month were 39-0-13 in the air and 1-0-2 on the ground. Missions 25 Sorties 296 d. Flak.— XIX TAC aircraft losses for the month because of flak Tons Bombs on Tgts 128 were unusually high. Out of the 50 aircraft lost, 35 were victims of Tons Frags 14.69 flak. The enemy, realizing that the greatest threat to the success of Tons Napalm 7.15 its ARD3NNBS salient was American air power, built up a very strong Tons Incendiaries 10.25 anti-aircraft defense around the entire area. Rockets 22 Claims (air) 4-1-1 The TTY TAC A-2 Flak Officer, reporting near the end of the Geraan retreat from the Bulge area, said: B. Reconnaissance: "The proportion of flak protection to troops and area involved (in Tac/R Sorties 58/36 1. INTRODUCTION. the ARDENNES area) was higher than in any previous operation in this P/R Sorties 7/6 war's history. Artillery sorties 4/2 a. General.— opening the year of 1945, the XIX Tactical Air Com­ mand-Third US Army team had a big job on its hands before it could re­ "Flak units were apparently given the highest priorities in supply C. Night Fighter: sume the assault of the SIEGFRIED LINE. The German breakthrough into of fuel and ammunition. They must also have been given a great degree of the ARDENNES had been checked but not yet smashed. The enemy columns freedom in moving over roads always taxed to capacity. Sorties 15 which had surged toward the MEUSE were beginning to withdraw, for the Claims (air) 1-0-0 v­ wily Rundstedt's best-laid plans had been wrecked on the rock of BAS­ "In addition to the tremendous quantities of mobile flak assigned TOGNS.
    [Show full text]
  • Rechtsnachfolge Der Deutsche Bahn AG in Haftungsansprüche Gegen Die Reichsbahn
    Wissenschaftliche Dienste Ausarbeitung Rechtsnachfolge der Deutsche Bahn AG in Haftungsansprüche gegen die Reichsbahn © 2021 Deutscher Bundestag WD 5 - 3000 - 030/21 Wissenschaftliche Dienste Ausarbeitung Seite 2 WD 5 - 3000 - 030/21 Rechtsnachfolge der Deutsche Bahn AG in Haftungsansprüche gegen die Reichsbahn Aktenzeichen: WD 5 - 3000 - 030/21 Abschluss der Arbeit: 10. Mai 2021 Fachbereich: WD 5: Wirtschaft und Verkehr, Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz Die Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages unterstützen die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages bei ihrer mandatsbezogenen Tätigkeit. Ihre Arbeiten geben nicht die Auffassung des Deutschen Bundestages, eines sei- ner Organe oder der Bundestagsverwaltung wieder. Vielmehr liegen sie in der fachlichen Verantwortung der Verfasse- rinnen und Verfasser sowie der Fachbereichsleitung. Arbeiten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste geben nur den zum Zeit- punkt der Erstellung des Textes aktuellen Stand wieder und stellen eine individuelle Auftragsarbeit für einen Abge- ordneten des Bundestages dar. Die Arbeiten können der Geheimschutzordnung des Bundestages unterliegende, ge- schützte oder andere nicht zur Veröffentlichung geeignete Informationen enthalten. Eine beabsichtigte Weitergabe oder Veröffentlichung ist vorab dem jeweiligen Fachbereich anzuzeigen und nur mit Angabe der Quelle zulässig. Der Fach- bereich berät über die dabei zu berücksichtigenden Fragen. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung und Fragestellung 4 2. Haftung nach dem Allgemeinen Kriegsfolgengesetz 4 2.1. Grundsätzliches Erlöschen von Rechtsansprüchen 4 2.2. Bundesentschädigungsgesetz 4 2.3. Ausnahmebestimmungen 5 2.3.1. Bundesbahnvermögensgesetz 5 2.3.1.1. Grundsatz: nur Aktiva 5 2.3.1.2. Schuldrechtliche Ansprüche 6 2.3.1.3. Ausnahme: „ausländische“ Unternehmen in privater Rechtsform 7 2.3.2. Bundesbahngesetz 8 3. Rechtslage im Beitrittsgebiet 10 3.1. Recht der DDR 10 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Running out of Land Designing Strategies for Ammerland’S Competing Land Use Demands
    Running out of land Designing strategies for Ammerland’s competing land use demands 6th EMiLA Summer School 28.08.-06.09.2014 EMiLA SUMMER SCHOOL 2014 Ammerlands historical park-like landscape with its meadows, groves, hedges and nurseries is increasingly challenged by competing land use demands, such as an expanding industrialised agriculture, ongoing construction activities, the expansion of nature reserves and peat extraction. All of these land uses aim to expand, but space is limited. Above all, these recent changes strongly influence the appearance of the historical park-like landscape which is a backbone for the local tourism. The EMiLA Summer School will work on regional landscape design with a particular focus on the involvement of local CONTACT stakeholders. Students will develop landscape concepts based on the cooperation with the real “landscape Leibniz Universität Hannover players”. During the workshop, the international teams will Faculty of Architecture and Landscape Sciences negotiate the stakeholders interests by developing systems Institute of Open Space Planning and Design of cooperations and their future activities. The “landscape Verena Butt players” such as nursery owners, farmers, planners and EMiLA-Coordinator mayors will be actively involved by offering guided tours, Herrenhäuser Str. 2a lectures and joining into design studio discussions. Regional D – 30419 Hannover experts and laymen will be invited to discuss the design proposals during the final exhibition. Phone: ++49 – (0)511 – 762 3627 Secretary: ++49 – (0)511 – 762 5528 During ten days, students from nine countries and four eMail: [email protected] continents will work in international teams of five, tutored Website: www.landschaft.uni-hannover.de, www.emila.eu by two teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We Were Able to Increase Our Transport Performance in Passenger and Freight Transport Significantly in 2000
    Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We were able to increase our transport performance in passenger and freight transport significantly in 2000. Positive Income Development Our operating income after interest improved by € 286 million. Modernization of Deutsche Bahn AG A comprehensive fitness program and the expansion of our capital expenditures will pave the way to our becoming an even more effective railway. Key figures Change in € million 2000 1999 in % Revenues 15,465 15,630 – 1.1 Revenues (comparable) 15,465 14,725 + 5.0 Income before taxes 37 91 – 59.3 Income after taxes 85 87 – 2.3 EBITDA 2,502 2,036 + 22.9 EBIT 450 71 + 533.8 Operating income after net interest 199 – 87 + 328.7 Return on capital employed in % 1.6 0.3 – Fixed assets 34,671 33,495 + 3.5 Total assets 39,467 37,198 + 6.1 Equity 8,788 8,701 + 1.0 Cash flow (before taxes) 2,113 2,107 + 0.3 Gross capital expenditures 6,892 8,372 – 17.7 Net capital expenditures 1) 3,250 3,229 + 0.7 Employees (as of Dec 31) 222,656 241,638 – 7.9 Performance figures Change Passenger Transport 2000 1999 in % Passengers DB Reise&Touristik million 144.8 146.5 – 1.2 DB Regio million 1,567.7 1,533.6 + 2.2 Total million 1,712.5 1,680.1 + 1.9 Passenger kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million pkm 2) 36,226 34,897 + 3.8 DB Regio million pkm 2) 38,162 37,949 + 0.6 Total million pkm 2) 74,388 72,846 + 2.1 Train kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million train-path km 175.9 177.5 – 0.9 DB Regio million train-path km 563.9 552.4 + 2.1 Total million train-path km 739.8 729.9 + 1.4 Freight Transport
    [Show full text]