Regulatory Takings and the Contested Future for Dutch Planning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regulatory Takings and the Contested Future for Dutch Planning DRAFT – DRAFT – DRAFT Do not quote or cite without permission of the authors Regulatory Takings and the Contested Future for Dutch Planning Harvey M. Jacobs 12 and Erwin van der Krabben 1 Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA, and Visiting Professor, Institute for Management Research, Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Professor, Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and Professor of Real Estate, School of the Built Environment, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland; [email protected] Delivered to the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP), Philadephia, PA October 2014. -1- I. Introduction mixed situation for regulatory takings among the countries of Europe (e.g. Dutch planning – in sectors such as Alterman 2010). A minority view is that urban, regional, environmental, transport, there is a broad form of regulatory takings and housing – is globally admired. Within emerging (e.g. Jacobs 2008b). the Dutch system planners appear to have authority and to be respected, and Dutch Land use planning in the Netherlands plans seem to be implemented. From an in the current period is structured by several American perspective, one of the reasons for recent changes, including: a crisis in the this seems to be the fact that Dutch planners traditional approach of public land operate within a social or legal climate with development, court decisions which very different attitudes about private decrease the role of the central government, property. In particular there does not appear an increasing interest in a new approach to to be anything equivalent to the American land development where the public sector social reverence afforded private property, will broadly define land use, but the private which can lead to intense social conflict over sector will act to realize land use private property’s management via planning, opportunities, a new, 2008, planning law, nor a legal tradition focused upon regulatory and preparations for again a new, but now takings which functions as a political brake more comprehensive planning law to be on the development and implementation of implemented after 2015 (van der Krabben planning policy. But the situation of Dutch and Jacobs 2013 discuss several of these planning is not quite what is seems and the factors in some detail). situation is changing. Part of that change is about regulatory takings. The Dutch system of planning law and practice has long had a mechanism for The literature evidences a conflict regulatory taking, but it has been little called about the status of regulatory takings in upon by landowners, it has resulted in Europe. (For the purpose of this paper modest yearly payments and it is little “regulatory takings” means the obligation of discussed by planning academics. The low government to compensate a landowner level of payment and the generally low level when governmental action is deemed to be of recognition of land-based property rights too onerous. This can be the result of as an issue for planners in the Netherlands is regulatory actions on a parcel or it can be in decided contrast to, for example, the from the spillover effects of other parcels situation in the U.S. (see for example the granted permission via governmental difference in discussion in van der Cammen action.1) The majority view is that there is a et al. 2012 versus Jacobs 2010; however, note the cautionary closing discussion in 1 Alterman (2010) defines these categories of takings actions as: major indirect takings (a decrease in an owner’s takings (where virtually all land value is lost value as a result of negative externalities as a result of a regulatory action), direct from neighboring land as a result of land use takings (a decrease, but not a total decrease, activity expressly permitted through in the value on an owner’s parcel), and government regulation) -2- Needham 2014: 218; this discussion is private property and the appropriate role of expanded upon in section V of this paper).2 government are affecting planning, even in cultures where planning has long-standing The major questions that structure respect. this research are: a) is regulatory takings changing in the Netherlands, as planning in In subsequent sections we discuss the general is under pressure to change, b) if it is changing Dutch planning context, the global changing, what factors best explain the context for regulatory taking and social change in regulator takings that is occurring, conflict over property, regulatory takings in and c) what might be the impacts of this The Netherlands, and end with speculation change for plans and planning practice. on the future of regulatory taking and discussion of necessary research. The research uses institutional and qualitative methodologies. These include II. The Changing Dutch Planning the authors’ knowledge of Dutch planning, Context selected interviews with key planning and legal experts, and a discussion of relevant Dutch planning – in sectors such as court decisions, and an examination of the urban, environmental, transport and housing 2008 Spatial Planning Act. – is globally admired. The Dutch themselves note how to the outsider The We conclude that regulatory taking is Netherlands can seem to be “a planner’s likely to become a more significant paradise” (Faludi and van der Valk 1994). component of the Dutch institutional Buitelaar (2010: 349) begins his landscape. While we anticipated selecting examination of changes in Dutch land policy among a set of hypotheses to explain why (a key element of Dutch planning policy) by this was true, we find instead that we are asserting “in the international literature and most comfortable arguing that it is all the discussions on land management, Dutch hypotheses, taken together, which offer a land policy is often presented as a special way to understand the changes that are case, sometimes even as a role model for unfolding. other countries.” And in a similar vein, Needham (2014a: xv) in the very first As non-Dutch planners have long sentence of his preface offers up that “there looked to Dutch planning as a model, is a lot of interest by professionals, understanding how it is transforming and the politicians and the interested layperson . likely consequences of these changes could in the way the Dutch use their land. Those help in: a) further refining current thinking ‘foreigners’ make study trips to the about the form and consequences of a multi- Netherlands so that they can see and marvel actor negotiated planning system and b) at it . how do the Dutch achieve it?” understanding the way global debates about A partial answer has to do with Dutch attitudes. Faludi (2005: 285) notes in 2 Alterman (2010: xix) says of the a volume on comparative planning cultures, U.S. “(n)owhere else is the property rights the Dutch are “a culture with a soft spot for debate as intensive and high profile . ” -3- planning.” Within the Dutch system . has reached almost mythical proportions” planners appear to have authority and to be (Buitelaar 2010: 351).4 Recent work both respected, and Dutch plans seem to be reflects on the Dutch successes in planning implemented. In this same volume, Faludi (in an almost self-congratulatory fashion) (2005: 292-293) explains that planners “. and seeks to clearly explain to an get the opportunity to operate as international audience how it is that the professionals,” and in general they “. are Dutch have accomplished what they have shielded from political interference.” This (van der Cammen et al. 2012 on the former, is so because the Dutch citizenry Needham 2014a on the latter). traditionally has not regarded the state (in this case public sector planners) as an alien Yet this traditional approach to and force, in fact “trust in the state is the basis success of planning is in the process of for the legitimacy of (all) Dutch change. Faludi (2005: 292) anticipated governmental action” (Faludi 2005: 294). such, even before the 2008 global economic crisis, when he noted that “. no guarantee The exceptionalism of the Dutch exists that the favorable conditions under with regard to spatial organization and social which Dutch planners operate will persist. order and the recognition of such (if not . So the future is open . ..” Five years later always admiration for such) is long standing. Buitelaar (2010) goes further when he titles Roodbol-Mekkes et al. (2012) note a steady his article “Cracks in the Myth,” and stream of positive observations on Dutch Roodbol-Mekkes et al. (2012: 378) added to planning since the 1960s by British, this by suggesting that Dutch planning American and Israeli scholars. In a recent doctrine is in “disarray,” asserting that “the history of Amsterdam, Shorto (2013) talks long-undisputed position of spatial planning about how in the 1600s foreign visitors to in the Netherlands is under attack.”5 And the Netherlands were amazed by the Dutch these concerns about the future of Dutch attention to order, planfulness, social planning are now part of a broader literature cooperation and courtesy. Interestingly (to which this paper is a contribution) noting Shorto also points out that the Dutch have a challenges to the conceptualization, long-standing tradition where they skillfully approach and practice of planning (see, for blend social cooperation and individualism, especially with regard to land management.3 4 Buitelaar’s comments are The long-standing, but especially specifically about land policy. Yet it seems post World War II approach to planning, is reasonable to generalize it to all spatial an approach that “is often praised . .” and “. planning, especially because of the key role of land for planning.
Recommended publications
  • Cross Cultural & Strategic Management
    Cross Cultural & Strategic Management The traditional Chinese philosophies in inter-cultural leadership: The case of Chinese expatriate managers in the Dutch context Li Lin, Peter Ping Li, Hein Roelfsema, Article information: To cite this document: Li Lin, Peter Ping Li, Hein Roelfsema, (2018) "The traditional Chinese philosophies in inter-cultural leadership: The case of Chinese expatriate managers in the Dutch context", Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, Vol. 25 Issue: 2, pp.299-336, https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2017-0001 Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2017-0001 Downloaded on: 24 January 2019, At: 00:53 (PT) References: this document contains references to 102 other documents. The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 1078 times since 2018* Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by All users group For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Planning Systems and Cultures | University College London
    09/29/21 BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning Systems and Cultures | University College London BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning View Online Systems and Cultures 1 Sanyal B. Introduction Chapter. In: Comparative planning cultures. New York: : Routledge 2005. 2 Gielen DM, Tasan-Kok T. Flexibility in Planning and the Consequences for Public-value Capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies 2010;18 :1097–131. doi:10.1080/09654311003744191 3 Rozee L. A new vision for planning – There must be a better way? Planning Theory & Practice 2014;15:124–38. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.873231 4 Colomb C, Tomaney J. Territorial Politics, Devolution and Spatial Planning in the UK: Results, Prospects, Lessons. Planning Practice & Research 2016;31:1–22. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1081337 5 Arbaci S. Ethnic Segregation, Housing Systems and Welfare Regimes in Europe. European Journal of Housing Policy 2007;7:401–33. doi:10.1080/14616710701650443 6 1/3 09/29/21 BENVGPL6: Comparative Planning Systems and Cultures | University College London Fainstein S. Chapter 2 ‘Land Value Capture and Justice’. In: Value capture and land policies . Cambridge, Mass: : Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 2012. 7 Hirt S. Home, Sweet Home: American Residential Zoning in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2013;33:292–309. doi:10.1177/0739456X13494242 8 Blomley N. Land use, planning, and the "difficult character of property”. Planning Theory & Practice 2016;:1–14. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1179336 9 Chapter ‘State and urban space in Brazil: from modernist planning to democratic interventions’ in Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Urban Land Use Planningcomparative Land Urban
    Comparative Urban LandComparative Planning Use ‘This book draws on a remarkable range of empirical cases and urban plans from all over the world to present a series of sharply delineated lessons about best practice approaches to land-use control in cities. Essential reading for anyone concerned with how to make the cities of the twenty- first century work smoothly and effectively in the public interest.’ Allen J. Scott, Distinguished Research Professor, University of California, Los Angeles Comparative Urban Land Use Planning The land use planning systems of the world are remarkably similar. Yet real urban problems – crime, drug abuse, inequality, alienation – are not easily solved by a traditional strategic planning process. Planning regimes are therefore under constant pressure to adjust, but often with a lack of knowledge of how things might be done better. Even though each regime arises in a cultural milieu, international trends can be spotted and best practices discerned. This work is scholarly and emotional, revealing a great love of cities and expressing a call for the development of relevant, more grounded, land use planning. Leslie A. Stein is Adjunct Professor of Urban Planning at the University of Sydney, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning. He was Best Practice recently Senior Fellow at the Global Center for Environmental Legal Studies at Pace University in New York and Visiting Scholar at the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. He was Chief Counsel to the Sydney Metropolitan Strategy and his books include Principles of Planning Law. Professor Stein is also a certified psychoanalyst and a graduate of Stein the C.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Network of Planning Expertise in St. Petersburg: Civic
    Uncovering the Network of Planning Expertise in St. Petersburg: Civic and State by Svetlana Moskaleva Submitted to: Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Sociology and Social Anthropology Supervisors: Prof. Jean-Louis Fabiani Prof. Judit Bodnar CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2019 Abstract This study explores the role of expertise in urban planning. Using the example of “urbanistica” – a local name for urban studies in Russia, the thesis will discuss the possibility of conceptualization of the struggle for recognition between various groups, including activists and professionals. The analysis will focus on an activist group which is involved in the projects of urban redevelopment in St. Petersburg. Members of the group work in research centers, as well as in city committees and use digital platforms to involve citizens in the discussion of urban problems. The purpose of the study is to expose the mechanisms of the social construction of civic expertise of urban problems and to contextualize global and local conditions in which this activity has been forming. Following Gil Eyal’s concept of expertise as a network as well as studies on transferring urban ideas (Friedman, King, Collier), I describe the hybridity of civic and state expertise and comprehend the processes occurring within groups, their integration into the institutional context. Through the analysis of planning documents, I trace how global urban concepts influence this context, producing political discourses or rather co-producing them together with citizens who are striving to become new political actors in urban planning.
    [Show full text]
  • History of City Planning Institution: University of California Date Offered: Fall 2007
    This syllabus courtesy of the Vernacular Architecture Forum Syllabus Exchange A collaborative project of the Vernacular Architecture Forum www.vafweb.org/resources/syllabi.html _____________________________________________________________________ instructor: Michael Teitz, James Buckley and Greg Newmark course title: History of City Planning institution: University of California date offered: Fall 2007 posted date: June 2008 stable URL: www.vafweb.org/resources/syllabi/teitzetal.pdf _____________________________________________________________________ This document is provided for non-commercial, informational purposes only. Department of City and Regional Planning CP200 – Fall 2007 University of California, Berkeley Michael Teitz/James Buckley/Greg Newmark CP 200: HISTORY OF CITY PLANNING (Tu/Th 11-12:30, 108 Wurster; Discussion Sections: TBA) Introduction This course covers the evolution of the ideals, profession, and practice of city planning from the 19th to the 21st Century. It explores the changing relationships between city and regional planning and broader historical trends in the light of changing ideas about who cities are for; about urban problem-solving; about how urban settlements should be organized and re-organized; about the relationships between the built and natural environments; and about the effects of urban form and organization on society. The focus is substantially but not entirely upon the American experience. Requirements 1. Attendance and participation in discussion: 10% 2. Mid-term exam: 15% 3. Research Paper: History of a Planning Idea, Program, or Movement: 50% 4. Final exam: 25% Readings 1. Peter Hall. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. (3rd edition) New York: Basil Blackwell, 2002. 2. Dolores Hayden. Building Suburbia: Greenfields and Urban Growth, 1820-2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Viennese Planning Culture: Understanding Change and Continuity Through the Hauptbahnhof
    VIENNESE PLANNING CULTURE: UNDERSTANDING CHANGE AND CONTINUITY THROUGH THE HAUPTBAHNHOF by VERONICA RAFFAELA SOPHIE REISS B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2014 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN PLANNING in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (PLANNING) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (VANCOUVER) AUGUST, 2017 © Veronica Raffaela Sophie Reiss, 2017 Abstract Today, cities across the globe face a multitude of similar challenges – climate change, new disruptive technologies, new conceptions of both labour and capital, and mass migration, among others; simultaneously, planning scholars are continually acknowledging the diversity of both the conception and practice of planning around the world. As such, the concept of planning cultures has grown in recognition and importance. While the literature around planning cultures grows, few area specific studies have been completed. This thesis seeks to contribute to the understanding of the planning culture of Vienna, Austria, through an exploration of the history of urban planning in Vienna and through a contemporary case study of the planning of the Vienna Hauptbahnhof project, the recently completed central train station. This thesis seeks to expand the understanding of planning processes, practices, and outcomes in Vienna, a city world renowned for its affordable and social housing, as well as for its high quality of life. ii Lay Summary This thesis seeks to expand the understanding of spatial planning processes, practices, and outcomes in Vienna, Austria, a city world renowned for its affordable and social housing, as well as for its high quality of life. This is done through an exploration of the history of urban planning in Vienna and through a case study of the planning process of the recently completed Vienna central train station.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III
    National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III NATIONAL REPORT ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT – HABITAT III Publication data Published by: Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning, Spatial Planning, Construction and Housing Directorate Edited by: mag. Ina Šuklje Erjavec mag. Tomaž Miklavčič mag. Aša Rogelj Zala Jerman Authors of individual sections: Dr. Vlasta Vodeb Dr. Luka Mladenovič Dr. Matej Nikšič Boštjan Cotič mag. Ina Šuklje Erjavec Sergeja Praper mag . Andrej Gulič Dr. Richard Sendi Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia mag. Tomaž Miklavčič Gregor Robič Nina Uršič Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning; Spatial Planning, Construction and Housing Directorate Translation to English: Doris Sodja, PSD Proofreading: Philip Burt Ljubljana, September 2016 The opinions and views expressed in the text do not necessarily represent the official opinions and views of the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning. The border between the Republic of Slovenia and the Republic of Croatia is not fixed and is subject to arbitration. The content and presentations in the National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III refer to various documents; however, the latter do not represent the actual state border and do not prejudge its determination or indication. National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III Preface At the global and European level, most of the population, economic activities, social and cultural interaction s , environmental and social problems are nowadays concentrated in cities. Therefore, greater emphasis is put on the appropriate development of cities to achieve sustainable development, reduce impacts on the environment and achieve welfare for all. To respond appropriately to the challenges posed by cities, we must initially identify these challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Civil Society and Formal Planning Institutions
    Developing Neighbourhood Management Capacity in Kobe, Japan: Interactions between civil society and formal planning institutions Patsy Healey Case study prepared for Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009 Available from http://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2009 Patsy Healey is professor emeritus in the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape at Newcastle University. She is a specialist in planning theory and the practice of planning and urban regeneration policies. She has undertaken research on how planning strategies work out in practice and on partnership forms of neighbourhood regeneration experiences. In recent years, she has been developing approaches to collaborative planning practices, linked to an institutionalist analysis of urban socio-spatial dynamics and urban governance. She has undertaken empirical work in the UK, in other European countries and in Latin America. Recent books include Collaborative Planning: shaping places in fragmented societies (1997, 2nd edition 2006) and Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies (2007). She is Senior Editor of the Journal, Planning Theory and Practice. Comments may be sent to the author by e-mail: [email protected]. Disclaimer: This case study is published as submitted by the consultant, and it has not been edited by the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Carmen Díez Medina Javier Monclús Editors
    Carmen Díez Medina Javier Monclús Editors Urban Visions From Planning Culture to Landscape Urbanism Urban Visions Carmen Díez Medina Javier Monclús Editors Urban Visions From Planning Culture to Landscape Urbanism 123 Editors Carmen Díez Medina Javier Monclús School of Engineering and Architecture School of Engineering and Architecture University of Zaragoza University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain Spain Translations: Trasluz SL (Foreword and Introduction); Caterina Fitzgerald (Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 24), Acantho (all other chapters); Hayden Salter (whole book review). ISBN 978-3-319-59046-2 ISBN 978-3-319-59047-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017944206 Translation from the Spanish language edition: Visiones urbanas. De la cultura del plan al urbanismo paisajístico by Javier Monclús and Carmen Díez Medina, © Abada Editores 2017. All Rights Reserved. © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning in Cold War Europe
    RCW 2 PLANNING IN COLD WAR EUROPE WAR PLANNING IN COLD Michel Christian, Sandrine Kott, Ondrej Matejka Michel Christian, Sandrine Kott, The book opens new perspectives on the global Cold War by looking at Ondrej Matejka (Eds.) social and economic planning. Despite the rival visions of the world that they put forward, ideas and practices of planning were also at the core of a common project of modernity. Based on new archival research, the contri- butions in this volume show how social and economic knowledge circulated globally and was reinterpreted and appropriated in various national and PLANNING local contexts. IN COLD WAR THE SERIES: RETHINKING THE COLD WAR The peer-reviewed series offers books that illuminate the multifaceted history of the Cold War in both its European and Global dimensions, across EUROPE and beyond the Iron Curtain. It focuses on the interactions, interdependen- COMPETITION, COOPERATION, CIRCULATIONS cies and co-operation of Eastern state socialist countries (and their citizens) with Western capitalist, Latin American, African and non-aligned states (1950s–1970s) (and their citizens), as well as with China. ( Eds. ) RETHINKING THE COLD WAR www.degruyter.com ISBN 978-3-11-052656-1 ISSN 2567-5311 Michel Christian, Sandrine Kott, Ondřej Matějka (Eds.) Planning in Cold War Europe Rethinking the Cold War Edited by Kirsten Bönker and Jane Curry Volume 2 Planning in Cold War Europe Competition, Cooperation, Circulations (1950s–1970s) Edited by Michel Christian, Sandrine Kott, Ondřej Matějka Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation. ISBN 978-3-11-052656-1 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-053469-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-053240-1 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110534696 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • Shanghai, London, and Paris Through the Looking Glass Carlos López
    Shanghai, London, and Paris through the Looking Glass Carlos López Galviz, School of Advanced Study, University of London [email protected] In the sequel to Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865), Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (1871), Lewis Carroll showed us the limits but also the possibilities of mirroring worlds. By stepping into a mirror, Alice discovers a distinct reflection of her own world, filled with new characters, notable among them the White Queen, who remembers future events. The mirror and the White Queen will help to locate the reflection that I wish to propose here. Images of the future of cities, to which imagined transport and mobility infrastructures are key, function like mirrors: they project worlds that are both a distortion and a promise of alternative realities, in the past and today. One of our tasks as historians is to remember things, events, people, an important part of which concerns remembering how the future has been envisioned before us, and the effects that these visions might have on our own futures: who envisioned what and in whose interest, for example, using what vehicles, under which circumstances and in response to what motivations. These are the questions that will serve as referents for this contribution, which, I must add, is as brief as it is speculative. My aim is to draw connections rather than providing an exhaustive survey of the fields to which this reflection might speak. I will show the pertinence of drawing parallels between contexts that are as different as they are distant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of Sustainable Built Environment Development in Iran
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UWL Repository Engineering Sustainability Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering Sustainability http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/ensu.14.00017 A critical review of sustainable built Paper 1400017 environment development in Iran Received 21/04/2014 Accepted 22/04/2015 Hakiminejad, Fu and Mohammadzadeh Titkanlou Keywords: developing countries/environment/sustainability ice | proceedings ICE Publishing: All rights reserved A critical review of sustainable built environment development in Iran 1 Ahmadreza Hakiminejad BArch, MA, PGC 3 Hamideh Mohammadzadeh Titkanlou BSc, MA, PhD PhD Candidate, Department of Built Environment, School of Computing Member of Managerial Board, Andisheh New Town Development and Technology, University of West London, London, UK Company, Tehran, Iran 2 Changfeng Fu MEng, MPhil, PhD, MRTPI, MCIAT Associate Professor, Department of Built Environment, School of Computing and Technology, University of West London, London, UK 1 2 3 Population explosion, irresponsible consumerism, environmental catastrophes, tremendous market-based urban development and the dedication of cities to cars and concrete rather than citizens and environment has put a big question mark over the future of the world’s developing countries. Urban sustainability has emerged as the only solution to the environmental, social and economic challenges facing our cities. In recent years in countries struggling with the concept of urban sustainability, such as Iran, academic circles and the state have had heated debates over sustainable development. The purpose of this paper is to examine the current situation of sustainable development of the built environment in Iran. The focus is on recognition of urban governance, policies and regulations.
    [Show full text]