DOCSLIB.ORG

View PDF for This Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

No.No. 113 113 DECEMBERDECEMBER 2002 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Office Bearers President Vice President Stephen Hopper John Clarkson Kings Park & Botanic Garden Centre for Tropical Agriculture West Perth PO Box 1054 WA 6005 Mareeba QLD tel: (08) 9480 3605 tel: (07) 4048 4745 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Brendan Lepschi Anthony Whalen Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600, Canberra GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6246 5167 tel: (02) 6246 5175 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor R.O.(Bob) Makinson Andrew Rozefelds Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Tasmanian Herbarium Mrs Macquaries Road GPO Box 252-40 Sydney NSW 2000 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 tel: (02) 9231 8111 tel.: (03) 6226 2635 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Public Officer Annette Wilson Australian Biological Resources Study Environment Australia GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6250 9417 email: [email protected] Affiliate Society Papua New Guinea Botanical Society ASBS Web site www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Webmaster: Murray Fagg Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Email: [email protected] Loose-leaf inclusions with this issue • Application for Membership of ASBS form • Payment of membership dues (membership renewal) form Publication dates of previous issue Austral.Syst.Bot.Soc.Nsltr 112 (September 2002 issue) Hardcopy: 1st Oct 2002; ASBS Web site: 27th Sep 2002 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 113 (December 2002) ASBS Inc. business The ballot on changes to the Society’s rules Report on the Special General Meeting of the Australian Systematic Botany Society, Canberra, 12th December 2002. Members will be aware of the recent activity in redrafting the Society's Rules, in order to bring A special vote of thanks was extended at the them in line with the ACT Registrar General's meeting to Bill Barker and Barry Conn for their Incorporated Associations Act. Both the past and efforts in this long and sometimes tortuous present Council, in particular Bill Barker and exercise. Barry Conn, have been heavily involved in the Brendan Lepschi unenviable task of reworking the existing ASBS ASBS Secretary Rules. All their hard work was put to the test with the recent postal ballot to accept or reject the proposed changes. The purpose of the SGM held in Canberra was to ratify the results of the ballot, Membership Fees 2003 prior to the (hopefully) final step of lodging the revised Rules with the Registrar General. These are now due and are payable to the Sixteen members (including four Council Treasurer, Anthony Whalen. members, John Clarkson joining in via a phone Amount owing is placed on the envelope of this hook-up) met in Canberra for what was to be a issue above the Return address at the bottom very brief but nonetheless vitally important left corner, e.g. in the form “Mship dues: Full meeting. Council is pleased to report overwhelming support from members for the $40”. proposed changes (106 to accept, 3 to reject (four Chapter Conveners have helped in the past to selected changes only)), and as such the revised facilitate payment amongst members by Rules are now in force, pending their imminent assembling and forwarding payments. lodgment with the Registrar General’s Office. Almost a third of ASBS members took part in the Forms to accompany your payment and for ballot, which is also a pleasing outcome, and applications for new membership are loose indicates an active and involved membership who enclosures in the envelope. are interested in the future of the Society. On behalf of Council, I would like to thank all Contact Anthony if there are any issues. members who took part in the ballot for their time and interest. ASBS President’s Report Presented to Annual General Meeting in Adelaide on 24th September 2002 The Society has completed another year of many up to the members to use this excellent diverse activities. publication to keep everyone informed of what is happening in Australian botany. ASBS Newsletter The Society’s Newsletter has continued to ASBS Website develop under the excellent editorship of Robyn The Society’s website has continued to flourish and Bill Barker. The introduction of more under the editorship of Murray Fagg. All issues photographs has added to the visual impact of the since Number 61 are now available in Adobe Newsletter. They continue to enthusiastically Portable Document Format (pdf) on our website. encourage everyone of the membership to Furthermore, “A comparison between the current provide articles of interest. As out-going Rules and the proposed Rules as modified” are President, I will watch with interest the provided on the website for the membership. It is membership’s decision to take the Newsletter in hoped that this format will encourage an electronic format or as printed copy. interpretation and discussion of the proposed Irrespective of the format chosen, as always, it is amendments to the Society’s Rules. 1 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 113 (December 2002) 5th International Flora Malesiana brought into line with the “Associations Symposium Incorporation Act 1991”. These changes will Although I reported on the 5th International Flora provide a more robust framework in which the Malesiana Symposium held in Cairns and Sydney Society operates. (September 2001) in the previous President’s Report, The Society justly deserves to be proud Conclusion of the support provided for this Symposium. This I sincerely thank all members of Council for their excellent conference brought together many dedication to the Society and for their hard work colleagues who work on various aspects of the throughout the year. And, I thank all ASBS flora of the Malesian region. The Society is members for their enthusiastic support to the pleased to have been able to provide financial Society and to Australian systematic botany. It support to all student members of ASBS who has been a privilege to have been President of the made presentations at this conference. It is with Society since 1999 and I wish the Society well pleasure that I thank and congratulate the for the future. The Society has a significant role presenters and organisers for a very successful to play in several arenas. One of the important conference. roles is the influencing of the debate on government funding for research into systematic Beyond Robert Brown botany, both at the Federal and State levels. The Society was proud to support the Beyond ASBS members have the opportunity of Robert Brown Symposium which was the first providing mentoring of the next generation of ASBS conference to be totally organised by post- systematists via under-graduate and post-graduate graduate students. This conference is a model of University programs, whether they are what can be done to encourage new botanical professional lecturers or not. Despite the limited researchers to present a summary of their resources available for plant systematics in research programs even though the projects may Australia, our research output is highly respected not be sufficiently developed for a full internationally. Therefore, we have a voice for presentation at an International gathering. I influencing plant systematics, and related encourage all students to consider running similar conservation research and management beyond events, either in their own right or in association Australia, particularly in developing countries of with other events. Asia and the Pacific. The Society has a valid role to play in keeping the membership informed of Marking the Robert Brown Bicentenary opportunities. It has been a wonderful opportunity for the Society to be involved with the many celebrations The future of the Society is with the membership. of the achievements of Matthew Flinders and Robert Brown. We are proud to have supported Barry Conn the Investigator 200 conference (December National Herbarium of New South Wales 2001), Encounter 2002 (March 2001), Robert Brown 200 conference (May 2002), and future events in northern Australia during the latter part of this year. On behalf of the Society, I sincerely thank Prof. David Mabberley for presenting public lectures in all States on Robert Brown and Ferdinand Bauer. However, it is extremely important to remember the dedication of many ASBS members, across Australia, who have planned and coordinated the many activities that make up this distributed event. I believe that this is the first time that the Society has been involved with such a large distributed event (distributed in space and time). Amendments to the Society’s Rules The redrafting of the Rules by which the Society operates has been an extremely demanding task that has involved considerable effort over several years. I look forward to the amended Rules being presented to the membership for their formal consideration. Although many of the changes appear to represent minor amendments, the Council believes that the Rules have been 2 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 113 (December 2002) Minutes of the 2002 Annual General Meeting of the Australian Systematic Botany Society, Inc. Tuesday 24th September, Benham Lecture Theatre, University of Adelaide 5. ASBS Rules (Constitution) Starting time: 6:15 pm. Suggested changes to the ASBS Rules (Constitution) were presented by Bill Barker. The President welcomed the 14 members present. Proposed that these be accepted, subject to voting by the society members, with special thanks to Present: Barry Conn (President - outgoing), Bill Bill Barker and Barry Conn for grinding through Barker (Vice President - outgoing), Anthony this tortuous issue. Proposed: Steve Hopper; Whalen (Treasurer), Brendan Lepschi (Secretary seconded: Peter Wilson. Carried. Action: – Minutes). Voting papers to be prepared and distributed to Society members by Bill and Robyn Barker.
Recommended publications
  • Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006

    Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006

    Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Current as at 1 September 2017 Queensland Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title . 5 2 Commencement . 5 3 Purpose . 5 4 Definitions . 6 5 Scientific names . 6 Part 2 Classes of native wildlife and declared management intent for the wildlife Division 1 Extinct in the wild wildlife 6 Native wildlife that is extinct in the wild wildlife . 7 7 Declared management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 8 Significance of extinct in the wild wildlife to nature and its value 8 9 Proposed management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 10 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of extinct in the wild wildlife 9 Division 2 Endangered wildlife 11 Native wildlife that is endangered wildlife . 10 12 Declared management intent for endangered wildlife . 10 13 Significance of endangered wildlife to nature and its value . 10 14 Proposed management intent for endangered wildlife . 11 15 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of endangered wildlife . 12 Division 3 Vulnerable wildlife 16 Native wildlife that is vulnerable wildlife . 13 17 Declared management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 13 18 Significance of vulnerable wildlife to nature and its value . 13 19 Proposed management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 14 20 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of vulnerable wildlife . 15 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Division 4 Near threatened wildlife 26 Native wildlife that is near threatened wildlife . 16 27 Declared management intent for near threatened wildlife . 16 28 Significance of near threatened wildlife to nature and its value .
  • Northern Beaches 2019 June Caleyi

    Northern Beaches 2019 June Caleyi

    p CALEYI i c A n d r e P o r t e n e r s NORTHERN BEACHES G R O U P austplants.com.au/northern-beaches June 2019 Australian Plants Society Northern Beaches APS NORTHERN BEACHES MAY MEETING [email protected] Anne Gray President Dr Conny Harris 9451 3231 At our May meeting Eleanor continued our education on Plant Families by Vice-President David Drage 9949 5179 presenting the Araliaceae Family. Secretary Penny Hunstead 9999 1847 Minutes Secretary Eleanor Eakins 9451 1883 This family is made up of 52 genera and 700 species worldwide. Eleanor Treasurer Lindy Monson 9953 7498 looked at the Astrotricha (star-hair) genus which is found in the Sydney area Regiona Delegate Harry Loots 9953 7498 and is closely related to the Apiaceae Family (flannel flowers). The plants Librarian Jennifer McLean 9970 6528 usually have star hairs on most parts of theAsplenium plant except obtusatum. the pic:Richard upper surface Hunstead of Website Administrator David Drage 9949 5179 the mature leaf. Membership Officer Jan Carnes 0416 101 327 Talk Co-ordinator Russell Beardmore 0404 023 223 Walk Co-ordinator Anne Gray 9402 4797 Catering Officer Georgine Jakobi 9981 7471 Newsletter Editor Jane March 0407 220 380 CALENDAR APS Northern Beaches meeting Thursday June 6, 2019 at Stony Range Botanic Garden, Dee Why. 7.00 pm Plant family. Campanulaceae - Estelle Burrows. 7.15 pm Presentation: Katriona Wragg: NBC Community Nursery Supervisor. Growing A Community Native Plant Nursery. Northern Beaches Council Community Native Plant Nursery started in 2009 and produced less than 1000 plants.
  • Evolutionary Relationships in Eucalyptus Sens. Lat. – a Synopsis

    Evolutionary Relationships in Eucalyptus Sens. Lat. – a Synopsis

    Euclid - Online edition Evolutionary relationships in Eucalyptus sens. lat. – a synopsis This article complements the introductory essay about eucalypts included in the "Learn about Eucalypts" section. Its aim is to provide an up-to-date account of the outcomes of research derived from different groups during the past 5 years relating to relationships within Eucalyptus s.s. As such it includes only those publications and hypotheses relating to higher level relationships of major groupings within the eucalypts. Some of the research reported below also provides insights into biogeographic relationships of the eucalypt group – in large part these are not the focus of this article and are not discussed in detail. Introduction The first comprehensive classification of the eucalypts was published by Blakely in 1934, in which he treated more than 600 taxa, building on earlier work of Maiden and Mueller. Blakely's classification remained the critical reference for Eucalyptus taxonomists for the next 37 years when a new but informal classification was published by Pryor and Johnson (1971). In this work the authors divided the genus into seven subgenera, and although of an informal nature, presented a system of great advance on Blakely's treatment. The small genus Angophora was retained. The next 20 years saw much debate about the naturalness of Eucalyptus and whether other genera should be recognized (e.g., Johnson 1987). Based on morphological data, Hill and Johnson in 1995 proposed a split in the genus and recognition of the genus Corymbia. This new genus of c. 113 species, comprised the ghost gums and the bloodwoods, and Hill and Johnson concluded that Corymbia is the sister group to Angophora, with the synapomorphy of the distinctive cap cells on bristle glands (Ladiges 1984) being unambiguous.
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)

    Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)

    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
  • Genera in Myrtaceae Family

    Genera in Myrtaceae Family

    Genera in Myrtaceae Family Genera in Myrtaceae Ref: http://data.kew.org/vpfg1992/vascplnt.html R. K. Brummitt 1992. Vascular Plant Families and Genera, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew REF: Australian – APC http://www.anbg.gov.au/chah/apc/index.html & APNI http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/apni Some of these genera are not native but naturalised Tasmanian taxa can be found at the Census: http://tmag.tas.gov.au/index.aspx?base=1273 Future reference: http://tmag.tas.gov.au/floratasmania [Myrtaceae is being edited at mo] Acca O.Berg Euryomyrtus Schaur Osbornia F.Muell. Accara Landrum Feijoa O.Berg Paragonis J.R.Wheeler & N.G.Marchant Acmena DC. [= Syzigium] Gomidesia O.Berg Paramyrciaria Kausel Acmenosperma Kausel [= Syzigium] Gossia N.Snow & Guymer Pericalymma (Endl.) Endl. Actinodium Schauer Heteropyxis Harv. Petraeomyrtus Craven Agonis (DC.) Sweet Hexachlamys O.Berg Phymatocarpus F.Muell. Allosyncarpia S.T.Blake Homalocalyx F.Muell. Pileanthus Labill. Amomyrtella Kausel Homalospermum Schauer Pilidiostigma Burret Amomyrtus (Burret) D.Legrand & Kausel [=Leptospermum] Piliocalyx Brongn. & Gris Angasomyrtus Trudgen & Keighery Homoranthus A.Cunn. ex Schauer Pimenta Lindl. Angophora Cav. Hottea Urb. Pleurocalyptus Brongn. & Gris Archirhodomyrtus (Nied.) Burret Hypocalymma (Endl.) Endl. Plinia L. Arillastrum Pancher ex Baill. Kania Schltr. Pseudanamomis Kausel Astartea DC. Kardomia Peter G. Wilson Psidium L. [naturalised] Asteromyrtus Schauer Kjellbergiodendron Burret Psiloxylon Thouars ex Tul. Austromyrtus (Nied.) Burret Kunzea Rchb. Purpureostemon Gugerli Babingtonia Lindl. Lamarchea Gaudich. Regelia Schauer Backhousia Hook. & Harv. Legrandia Kausel Rhodamnia Jack Baeckea L. Lenwebia N.Snow & ZGuymer Rhodomyrtus (DC.) Rchb. Balaustion Hook. Leptospermum J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. Rinzia Schauer Barongia Peter G.Wilson & B.Hyland Lindsayomyrtus B.Hyland & Steenis Ristantia Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh.
  • (OUV) of the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area

    (OUV) of the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area

    Handout 2 Natural Heritage Criteria and the Attributes of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area The notes that follow were derived by deconstructing the original 1988 nomination document to identify the specific themes and attributes which have been recognised as contributing to the Outstanding Universal Value of the Wet Tropics. The notes also provide brief statements of justification for the specific examples provided in the nomination documentation. Steve Goosem, December 2012 Natural Heritage Criteria: (1) Outstanding examples representing the major stages in the earth’s evolutionary history Values: refers to the surviving taxa that are representative of eight ‘stages’ in the evolutionary history of the earth. Relict species and lineages are the elements of this World Heritage value. Attribute of OUV (a) The Age of the Pteridophytes Significance One of the most significant evolutionary events on this planet was the adaptation in the Palaeozoic Era of plants to life on the land. The earliest known (plant) forms were from the Silurian Period more than 400 million years ago. These were spore-producing plants which reached their greatest development 100 million years later during the Carboniferous Period. This stage of the earth’s evolutionary history, involving the proliferation of club mosses (lycopods) and ferns is commonly described as the Age of the Pteridophytes. The range of primitive relict genera representative of the major and most ancient evolutionary groups of pteridophytes occurring in the Wet Tropics is equalled only in the more extensive New Guinea rainforests that were once continuous with those of the listed area.
  • Supplementary Material Saving Rainforests in the South Pacific

    Supplementary Material Saving Rainforests in the South Pacific

    Australian Journal of Botany 65, 609–624 © CSIRO 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT17096_AC Supplementary material Saving rainforests in the South Pacific: challenges in ex situ conservation Karen D. SommervilleA,H, Bronwyn ClarkeB, Gunnar KeppelC,D, Craig McGillE, Zoe-Joy NewbyA, Sarah V. WyseF, Shelley A. JamesG and Catherine A. OffordA AThe Australian PlantBank, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mount Annan, NSW 2567, Australia. BThe Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia DBiodiversity, Macroecology and Conservation Biogeography Group, Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. EInstitute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222 Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand. FRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, RH17 6TN, United Kingdom. GNational Herbarium of New South Wales, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. HCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 (below) comprises a list of seed producing genera occurring in rainforest in Australia and various island groups in the South Pacific, along with any available information on the seed storage behaviour of species in those genera. Note that the list of genera is not exhaustive and the absence of a genus from a particular island group simply means that no reference was found to its occurrence in rainforest habitat in the references used (i.e. the genus may still be present in rainforest or may occur in that locality in other habitats). As the definition of rainforest can vary considerably among localities, for the purpose of this paper we considered rainforests to be terrestrial forest communities, composed largely of evergreen species, with a tree canopy that is closed for either the entire year or during the wet season.
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland

    South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Reconstructing the Deep-Branching Relationships of the Papilionoid Legumes

    Reconstructing the Deep-Branching Relationships of the Papilionoid Legumes

    SAJB-00941; No of Pages 18 South African Journal of Botany xxx (2013) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes D. Cardoso a,⁎, R.T. Pennington b, L.P. de Queiroz a, J.S. Boatwright c, B.-E. Van Wyk d, M.F. Wojciechowski e, M. Lavin f a Herbário da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (HUEFS), Av. Transnordestina, s/n, Novo Horizonte, 44036-900 Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil b Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, EH5 3LR Edinburgh, UK c Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Modderdam Road, \ Bellville, South Africa d Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P. O. Box 524, 2006 Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa e School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA f Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA article info abstract Available online xxxx Resolving the phylogenetic relationships of the deep nodes of papilionoid legumes (Papilionoideae) is essential to understanding the evolutionary history and diversification of this economically and ecologically important legume Edited by J Van Staden subfamily. The early-branching papilionoids include mostly Neotropical trees traditionally circumscribed in the tribes Sophoreae and Swartzieae. They are more highly diverse in floral morphology than other groups of Keywords: Papilionoideae. For many years, phylogenetic analyses of the Papilionoideae could not clearly resolve the relation- Leguminosae ships of the early-branching lineages due to limited sampling.
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California

    Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California

    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
  • Revisão Taxonômica E Filogenia De Poecilanthe S.L. (Leguminosae

    Revisão Taxonômica E Filogenia De Poecilanthe S.L. (Leguminosae

    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS José Eduardo de Carvalho Meireles Revisão taxonômica e filogenia de Poecilanthe s.l. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Brongniartieae) Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas como um dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia Vegetal Orientadora: Dra. Ana Maria Goulart de Azevedo Tozzi Campinas – SP 2007 i ii iii Dedico essa tese à minha família, que está se lixando para as plantas, mas me ensinou o que levo de mais importante iv AGRADECIMENTOS À Dra. Ana Tozzi pela orientação, incentivo e apoio durante a execução do trabalho. Ao Dr. Haroldo Lima, pela amizade, colaboração, e por ter me ensinado a dar os primeiros passos. A ele devo grande parte do que sei. Aos professores do Departamento de Botânica, principalmente Dra. Angela Martins, Dr. João Semir, Dra. Kikyo Yamamoto, Dra. Luiza Kinoshita, Dra. Maria do Carmo Amaral, Dra. Sandra Guerreiro e Dr. Volker Bittrich. Aos professores e colegas do JBRJ, especialmente à Dra. Marli Pires, Dr. Vidal Mansano, Luciana e Robson. Aos doutores Gwilym Lewis, Enrique Forero e Matt Lavin pelas inúmeras sugestões e pela paciência incomensurável de corrigir os manuscritos. Ao Dr. Matt Lavin ainda pela dedicação, ensinamentos e confiança no trabalho. A todos os colegas do departamento, Ana(s) (Cristina e Paula), André, Bil, Careca, Caiafa, Cristiano, Fabiana, Fabiano, Gastão, Gustavo, Itayguara, João Carlos, Karina, Kayna, Leonardo, Marcelinho, Marcos, Roberta, Rita, Rodrigo, Rosilene, Rubem, Sandra, Samantha, Shesterson e Tiago. Quero agradecer em especial ao André Gil, João Aranha e Lidy alarga- chapéu, pela amizade e imensa colaboração. v Às pessoas que me apoiaram durante as viagens de campo: Zé Du e Cida, Nory, Daniel e Everaldo do INPA.
  • Fitzroy, Queensland

    Fitzroy, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.