Against the Grain Volume 30 Issue 2 Article 23 2018 Cases of Note-Copyright-Constructive Trust Bruce Strauch The Citadel, Emeritus,
[email protected] Bryan M. Carson Western Kentucky University,
[email protected] Jack Montgomery Western Kentucky University Libraries,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Strauch, Bruce; Carson, Bryan M.; and Montgomery, Jack (2018) "Cases of Note-Copyright-Constructive Trust," Against the Grain: Vol. 30: Iss. 2, Article 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.8049 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact
[email protected] for additional information. LEGAL ISSUES Section Editors: Bruce Strauch (The Citadel) <
[email protected]> Jack Montgomery (Western Kentucky University) <
[email protected]> Cases of Note — Copyright — Constructive Trust Column Editor: Bruce Strauch (The Citadel, Emeritus) <
[email protected]> MATTEL, INC. V. MGA ENTERTAIN- Pool, Bratz Babyz Ponyz Buggy Blitz, Ninth said ‘twas inequitable to transfer a MENT, INC. UNITED STATES COURT OF etc.), video games (“Bratz: Girlz Really billion dollar brand because Bryant had an APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, Rock,” “Bratz: Forever Diamondz,” idea in the last weeks of his job. 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 26937. “Bratz: Rock Angelz,” etc.) AND Bratz So Now What? This opinion was written by Chief Judge the movie. Well, you’re back with copyright viola- Alex Kozinski who was considered one of the The Appeal great brains of copyright.