Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 222/Wednesday, November 18

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 1998 / Notices 64097 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Township 59 South, Range 40 East, and concerning the application, EA, or HCP section 19, Township 59 South, Range should be submitted to the Regional Fish and Wildlife Service 41 East, Monroe County, Florida Office. Requests for the documentation (Project). Clearing of the 49 residential must be in writing to be processed. Availability of an Environmental lots will destroy suitable habitat for the Comments must be submitted in writing Assessment and Finding of No three species identified above. A more to be adequately considered in the Significant Impact, and Receipt of an detailed description of the mitigation Service's decision-making process. Application for an Incidental Take and minimization measures to address Please reference permit number Permit for a Proposed Residential the effects of the Project to the protected TE004859±0 in such comments, or in Development Called Ocean Reef Club, species are outlined in the Applicant's requests of the documents discussed Plats 18 and 19, Monroe County, Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), the herein. Florida Service's Environmental Assessment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (EA), and in the SUPPLEMENTARY Rick G. Gooch, Regional HCP INFORMATION Interior. section below. Coordinator, (see ADDRESSES above), The Service also announces the ACTION: Notice. telephone: 404/679±7110, facsimile: availability of an EA and HCP for the 404/679±7081; or Mr. Mike Jennings, Driscoll Properties, Inc. and Driscoll incidental take application. Copies of Fish and Wildlife Biologist, South Foundation, Inc. previously obtained an the EA and/or HCP may be obtained by Florida Ecosystem Office, Vero Beach, making a request to the Regional Office incidental take permit (ITP) pursuant to Florida (see ADDRESSES above), section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered (see ADDRESSES). Requests must be in telephone: 561/562±3909. Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et writing to be processed. This notice also seq.), as amended (Act). The previous advises the public that the Service has SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Key ITP authorized the take of the made a preliminary determination that Largo woodrat and Key Largo cotton endangered Key Largo woodrat issuing the ITP is not a major Federal mouse are subspecies that occur only on (Neotoma floridana smalli), Key Largo action significantly affecting the quality Northern Key Largo. They have been cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus of the human environment within the extirpated from much of the Key Largo allapaticola), and Schaus swallowtail meaning of Section 102(2)(C) of the due to clearing of tropical hardwood butterfly (Heraclides aristodemus National Environmental Policy Act of hammocks for urban development. The ponceanus) in association with 1969, as amended (NEPA). The Finding Schaus swallowtail butterfly is residential construction on 89 lots in of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is restricted to extreme Southeast Florida Plats 18 and 19 of Ocean Reef Club, based on information contained in the and the upper and middle keys. This north Key Largo, Monroe County, EA and HCP. The final determination butterfly is also dependant on tropical Florida. However, the original ITP will be made no sooner than 30 days hardwood hammock vegetation and has expired on May 31, 1995, and 70 of the from the date of this notice. This notice been adversely affected by urban growth 89 lots covered under that ITP were not is provided pursuant to Section 10 of in South Florida and the Florida Keys. altered. Accordingly, a new ITP is the Act and NEPA regulations (40 CFR The Key Largo woodrat represents the required to ensure compliance with the 1506.6). southern most subspecies of the eastern prohibitions of section 9 of the Act The Service specifically requests woodrat (Neotoma floridana). It is while residential construction occurs on information, views, opinions from the restricted to the tropical hardwood the remaining undeveloped lots that public via this Notice on the Federal hammocks of Key Largo. Like the cotton still contain suitable habitat for the action, including the identification of mouse, the woodrat has experienced species listed above. Review of the any other aspects of the human substantial declines in their range due undeveloped lots by the Fish and environment not already identified in principally to urban development on Wildlife Service (Service) indicated that the Service's EA. Further, the Service is Key Largo. Extant woodrats are now 49 of the 70 lots still contain suitable specifically soliciting information found only north of the intersection of habitat for the Key Largo woodrat, Key regarding the adequacy of the HCP as U.S. 1 and C.R. 905. More than 41 Largo cotton mouse, and Schaus measured against the Service's ITP percent of the historical habitat of this swallowtail butterfly. issuance criteria found in 50 CFR Parts species has been lost to urbanization. Forty-one of the 49 lots for which take 13 and 17. Like the cotton mouse, woodrats are of federally listed species will occur DATES: Written comments on the ITP vulnerable to habitat loss and during construction related activities application, EA, and HCP should be fragmentation and the indirect affects of have been sold by Driscoll Properties, sent to the Service's Regional Office (see urban encroachment (e.g., competition Inc. and Driscoll Foundation, Inc. to ADDRESSES) and should be received on with black rats and increased predation third parties. The Ocean Reef or before December 18, 1998. from domestic animals). Community Association represents all ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review Key Largo woodrats, like other third party lot owners. the application, HCP, and EA may members of the genus Neotoma, are Driscoll Properties, Inc., Driscoll obtain a copy by writing the Service's known for their construction of large Foundation, Inc., and Ocean Reef Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta, stick nests. Nests are typically built at Community Association (Applicants), Georgia. Documents will also be the base of a tree and are composed of seek an ITP from the Service. The ITP available for public inspection by sticks, twigs, and other organic matter. would authorize for a period of 10 years appointment during normal business Woodrats are territorial in the vicinity of the incidental take of the endangered hours at the Regional Office, 1875 their nest sites, but probably interact Key Largo woodrat, Key Largo cotton Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, socially under some form of hierarchy mouse and Schaus swallowtail butterfly. Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered with other woodrats. Woodrats appear The proposed residential development Species Permits), or Field Supervisor, to attain their greatest densities in is called Ocean Reef Club, Plats 18 and Fish and Wildlife Service, Post Office mature hardwood hammocks, with 19 and will consist of 49 homes located Box 2676, Vero Beach, Florida 32961± lower densities found adjacent to urban on about 20 acres in section 24, 2676. Written data or comments settings. 64098 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 1998 / Notices The Key Largo cotton mouse is larger number of nectar producing plant The no action alternative may result and more reddish in appearance than species endemic to hardwood in the loss of habitat and exposure of the other subspecies in Florida. It is found hammocks, but have most often been Applicants under Section 9 of the Act only on Key Largo in relict tropical observed feeding on guava (Psidium if lots were cleared. If the ITP were not hardwood hammock vegetation. guajava), cheese shrub (Morinda royoc), issued and the Applicants did not Historically the Key Largo cotton mouse and wild coffee (Psychotria undata). remove vegetation from any of the lots, was found throughout Key Largo where Adults rarely feed in open areas habitat for the three federally listed tropical hardwood hammocks existed exposed to direct sunlight. The eggs of species would remain intact and but development and the subsequent this species are typically laid on wild probably provide suitable habitat in the loss of tropical hardwood vegetation lime (Zanthoxylem fagara) and future. The proposed action alternative resulted in a range reduction of this torchwood (Amyris elemifera) with is issuance of the ITP according to the species. It is now found only in North caterpillars subsequently eating young, HCP as submitted and described above. Key Largo, north of the intersection of tender shoots of these species. Under the proposed alternative, about U.S. 1 and C.R. 905. The Applicant's HCP and the 19.6 acres of suitable habitat will be Little is known about the Key Largo Service's EA describes the following destroyed during residential cotton mouse and much is inferred from minimization and mitigation strategy to development. The effect of the other cotton mice populations in be employed by the Applicant to offset minimization and mitigation strategy Florida. In general, this subspecies is the impacts of the Project to the Key will be that about 11 acres of habitat considered a nocturnal tropical Largo woodrat, Key Largo cotton mouse, will be protected or enhanced and hardwood hammock dweller that and Schaus swallowtail butterfly. Many another 11 to 15 acres will be preserved constructs nests in logs, tree hollows of the mitigation measures identified onsite through vegetation set asides. and rock crevices. Key Largo cotton below were implemented and As stated above, the Service has made mice may breed at any time of the year completed as part of the ITP previously a preliminary determination that the and produce two to three litters per issued to Driscoll Properties, Inc. and issuance of the ITP is not a major year. These cotton mice are omnivorous Driscoll Foundation, Inc.: Federal action significantly affecting the and are believed to rely heavily on the • Protect and convey through quality of the human environment large fruit and berry crop produced by conservation easement 5.94 acres of within the meaning of Section 102(2)(C) tropical hardwood hammock vegetation.
Recommended publications
  • Habitat Use of the Key Largo Woodrat (Neotoma Floridana Smalli) Lauren J

    Habitat Use of the Key Largo Woodrat (Neotoma Floridana Smalli) Lauren J

    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-12-2014 Habitat Use of the Key Largo Woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli) Lauren J. Barth Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14110745 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Barth, Lauren J., "Habitat Use of the Key Largo Woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli)" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1644. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1644 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida HABITAT USE OF THE KEY LARGO WOODRAT (NEOTOMA FLORIDANA SMALLI) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES by Lauren J. Barth 2014 To: Interim Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts and Sciences This thesis, written by Lauren J. Barth, and entitled Habitat Use of the Key Largo Woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli), having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Michael Gaines _______________________________________ Phillip Hughes _______________________________________ Joel Heinen _______________________________________ Jennifer Rehage, Co-Major Professor _______________________________________ Michael Ross, Co-Major Professor Date of Defense: November 12, 2014 The thesis of Lauren J.
  • United States Ent of the Interior

    United States Ent of the Interior

    United States ent of the interior FiSH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 1339 :30m Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 February 9, 2010 Memorandum To: Roxa . 11: David Dell ieid Supervisor, South Florida Ecological Services Office Subject: Biological opinion addressing effects of issuing a recovery permit (TE206774-0) to Sean Beckmann for research on the Key Largo cotton mouse This document transmits the Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the proposed issuance of a section 10(a)(l)(A) recovery permit to conduct surveys and collect genetic material of the endangered Key Largo cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypians aflaparicole) (KLCM) Within the hammock habitat on northern Key Largo, Monroe County, Florida. This study will examine if anthropogenic habitat fragmentation has led to a decrease in genetic diversity among isolated southeastern cotton mouse populations. The survey protocol employed in these studies may also incidentally trap the endangered Key Largo woodrat (Neoz‘omafloridana smalli) (KLWR). This document is prepared in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (87 Stat. 884; 16 [ISO 1531 et seq.) This biological opinion is based on published literature, research reports, the permit application and subsequent correspondence, telephone conversations, field investigations, the captive propagation and reintroduction plan for the KLWR (Service 2003), and other sources of information. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at the South Florida Ecological Services Office (SFESO) in Vero Beach, Fiorida. Consultation History On May 16, 2008, Sean Beckmann of the University of Miami, Florida submitted a recovery permit application to the Service’s Southeast Regional Office.
  • Trapping Results of the Endangered Key Largo Cotton Mouse and Key Largo Woodrat

    Trapping Results of the Endangered Key Largo Cotton Mouse and Key Largo Woodrat

    Trapping results of the endangered Key Largo cotton mouse and Key Largo woodrat Daniel U. Greene and Jeffery A. Gore Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Introduction • Sub-species • Endemic KLCM: Peromyscus gossypinus allapaticola • Historically ranged throughout the island • Over two-thirds of historic habitat lost KLWR: Neotoma floridana smalli Population Decline • Concern for population declines in all rodent species in Key Largo since 1970’s • Habitat loss and proposed developments led to Federal listing under the ESA on August 31,1984 • Land purchase: – Majority of North Key Largo protected under State & Federal management Present Habitat • Managed by: – Dagny Johnson Key Largo Hammock Botanical SP – Crocodile Lake NWR • 790-945 ha of upland hardwood hammocks – 851 ha used Habitat Quality • Habitat - range of disturbances • Farming, hurricanes, fire • Fragmentation • 2 inactive military sites • Aquaculture • Residences • Waste transfer station • Large raccoon and feral cat populations • Exotic species • Pythons/boas, iguanas, fire ants, invasive plants Objectives • Develop a standardized methodology for reliably assessing population trends – Based on results from 2007 – Feasible given the personnel & budgetary constraints » Allow for long-term monitoring – 2008-Present – test method • Describe population structure – Fulfill needs in Multi-Species Recovery Plan Methods Stratified Random Design • Randomly selected 34 7 x 7 trapping grids with 10 m spacing (0.36 ha each, 12.24 ha total) Proportional allocation Young - 95 ha (Disturbed >1971) » 6 grids Medium - 325 ha (Disturbed 1940-71) » 12 grids Old - 430 ha (Disturbed <1940) » 16 grids Methods Trapping • 3 sessions in 2007 – 1 March - 11 May – 4 July - 7 Sept. – 29 Oct.
  • The Key Largo Woodrat Resides in Tropical Hardwood

    The Key Largo Woodrat Resides in Tropical Hardwood

    Key Largo Woodrat Neotoma floridana smalli he Key Largo woodrat resides in tropical hardwood Federal Status: Endangered (August 31, 1984) hammocks on Key Largo. This small endemic rodent Tonce ranged throughout all of Key Largo, but today Critical Habitat: None Designated is limited to the northernmost portions. Known for its habit Florida Status: Endangered of building large stick houses, Key Largo woodrats depend Recovery Plan Status: Original (May 18, 1999) heavily on the natural vegetation of the tropical hardwood Geographic Coverage: Rangewide hammocks to obtain material for constructing these houses. Although large portions of the remaining habitat are now in Figure 1. Distribution of the Key Largo woodrat; protection, there has been such a reduction in its total range this species is endemic only to Key Largo in the and habitat that the future of this species remains in an Florida Keys. endangered condition. This account represents the range-wide recovery plan for the Key Largo woodrat. Description The color of the Key Largo woodrat is described as sepia or grey-brown above shading into cinnamon on the sides, with cream or white ventral coloration. The forefeet are white to the wrist and the hindfeet are primarily white to the ankles. The Key Largo woodrat has large ears, protuberant eyes, and a hairy tail. The head-and-body-length of the Key Largo woodrat ranges from 120 to 230 mm, their tail length ranges from 130 to 190 mm, and their hindfoot length ranges from 32 to 39 mm. Males, on average, weigh 258 g, while the females tend to be much smaller, weighing only 210 g (Hersh 1981).
  • Burmese Pythons in South Florida: Scientific Support for Invasive Species Management1 Rebecca G

    Burmese Pythons in South Florida: Scientific Support for Invasive Species Management1 Rebecca G

    WEC242 Burmese Pythons in South Florida: Scientific Support for Invasive Species Management1 Rebecca G. Harvey, Matthew L. Brien, Michael S. Cherkiss, Michael Dorcas, Mike Rochford, Ray W. Snow, and Frank J. Mazzotti2 A Rapidly Growing Problem Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) are popular pets in the United States because of their attractive color pattern, reputed docility, and the allure (for some) of owning a giant snake. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, approximately 99,000 Burmese pythons were imported to the United States between 1996 and 2006 (compared to only 17,000 between 1970 and 1995). The species is classified by the World Conservation Union as “near threatened” in its native range in Southeast Asia due to exportation for the pet trade and hunting for skins. Thousands of pythons are also captive bred each year in the U.S. for sale as pets. Burmese pythons sell at reptile trade shows for as little as $20, and at pet stores for $65-80. An inexperienced snake keeper who takes home a 50-centime- ter (20-inch) hatchling is, within a year, responsible for a brawny 2.4-meter (eight-foot) predator. Unable to handle their giant snakes, and unable to find new homes for them, some owners illegally release them into the wild. Released and escaped Burmese pythons are now breeding in the wild, Figure 19. and their growing numbers may result in dire consequences Credits: Mike Rochford, University of Florida for native wildlife and ecosystems in South Florida. Native to Southeast Asia, Burmese pythons are an exotic (nonnative) species in South Florida.
  • Pub List 111210

    Pub List 111210

    Jim Boone’s Publications Ph. D. Dissertation Boone, J. L. 1995. Patterns of temporal and geographic variation in the genetics and morphology of cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus). Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, 239 pp. M.S. Thesis Boone, J. L. 1990. Reassessment of the taxonomic status of the Cotton Mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus anastasae) on Cumberland Island, Georgia, and the implications of this information for conservation. MS Thesis, Univ. of Georgia. 70 pp. B.S. Thesis Boone, J. L. 1986. Morphological differences between populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus rubidus) in sand dune and upland habitats. B.S. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. Books Hiatt, H., and J. Boone. 2003. Clark County, Nevada: Species Account Manual. Department of Comprehensive Planning, Clark County, Nevada. 218 pp. Refereed Literature Rautenstrauch, K. R., D. L. Rakestraw, G. A. Brown, J. L. Boone, and P. E. Lederle. 2002. Patterns of Burrow Use by Desert Tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) in Southcentral Nevada. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 4(2):398-405. Boone, J. L., and E. A. Holt. 2001. Field Sexing Young Free-ranging Desert Tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) Using External Morphology. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 4(1):28-33. Boone, J. L., P. E. Lederle, and S. L. Petersen. 1999. More Additions to the Birds of Nevada Test Site. Western Birds, 30:211-213. Laerm, J., W. M. Ford, T. S. McKay, M. A. Menzel, L. T. Lepardo, and J. L. Boone. 1999. Soricid Communities in the Southern Appalachians. Pp. 177-193 in Proceedings of the Appalachian Biodiversity Symposium: Virginia Museum of Natural History, Special Publication Number 7, Blackburg.
  • Evaluating Nest Supplementation As a Recovery Strategy for the Endangered Rodents of the Florida Keys Michael V

    Evaluating Nest Supplementation As a Recovery Strategy for the Endangered Rodents of the Florida Keys Michael V

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluating nest supplementation as a recovery strategy for the endangered rodents of the Florida Keys Michael V. Cove1,2, Theodore R. Simons3, Beth Gardner4, Andrew S. Maurer5, Allan F. O’Connell6 The Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli) and Key Largo cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus allapaticola)are federally endangered subspecies endemic to the tropical hardwood hammocks of Key Largo, Florida. Woodrats are considered generalists in habitat and diet, yet a steady decline in natural stick nests and capture rates over the past several decades suggests that they are limited by the availability of nesting habitat due to habitat loss and fragmentation. The more specialized Key Largo cotton mouse appears to rely on old growth hammock, a habitat type that is rare following past land clearing. In 2004, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service started building supplemental nest structures to restore habitat quality and connectivity for these endangered rodents, but nest use requires evaluation. We used camera traps and occupancy models to evaluate the factors influencing woodrat and cotton mouse use of the supplemental nests. We detected woodrats at 65 and cotton miceat 175 of 284 sampled nest structures, with co-occurrence at 38 nests. Woodrat nest use followed a gradient from low nest use in the north to high nest use in the south, which might relate to the proximity of free-ranging domestic cat (Felis catus) colonies in residential developments. Cotton mouse nest use, however, was related positively to mature hammock and related negatively to disturbed areas (e.g. scarified lands). The two species occurred independently of each other.
  • SERDP Project ER18-1653

    SERDP Project ER18-1653

    FINAL REPORT Approach for Assessing PFAS Risk to Threatened and Endangered Species SERDP Project ER18-1653 MARCH 2020 Craig Divine, Ph.D. Jean Zodrow, Ph.D. Meredith Frenchmeyer Katie Dally Erin Osborn, Ph.D. Paul Anderson, Ph.D. Arcadis US Inc. Distribution Statement A Page Intentionally Left Blank This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. Page Intentionally Left Blank Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
  • Reading Essentials an Interactive Student Textbook Fl7.Msscience.Com Glencoe Science to the Student

    Reading Essentials an Interactive Student Textbook Fl7.Msscience.Com Glencoe Science to the Student

    Reading Essentials An Interactive Student Textbook fl7.msscience.com Glencoe Science To the Student In today’s world, knowing science is important for thinking critically, solving problems, and making decisions. But understanding science sometimes can be a challenge. Reading Essentials takes the stress out of reading, learning, and understanding science. This book covers important concepts in science, offers ideas for how to learn the information, and helps you review what you have learned. In each chapter: • Before You Read sparks your interest in what you’ll learn and relates it to your world. • Read to Learn describes important science concepts with words and graphics. Next to the text you can find a variety of study tips and ideas for organizing and learning information: • The Study Coach offers tips for getting the main ideas out of the text. • Foldables™ Study Organizers help you divide the information into smaller, easier- to-remember concepts. • Reading Checks ask questions about key concepts. The questions are placed so you know whether you understand the material. • Think It Over elements help you consider the material in-depth, giving you an opportunity to use your critical-thinking skills. • Picture This questions specifically relate to the art and graphics used with the text. You’ll find questions to get you actively involved in illustrating the concepts you read about. • Applying Math reinforces the connection between math and science. • Use After You Read to review key terms and answer questions about what you have learned. The Mini Glossary can assist you with science vocabulary. Review questions focus on the key concepts to help you evaluate your learning.
  • Sea Level Rise Adaptation in the Florida Keys: Conserving Terrestrial and Intertidal Natural Areas and Native Species

    Sea Level Rise Adaptation in the Florida Keys: Conserving Terrestrial and Intertidal Natural Areas and Native Species

    Sea Level Rise Adaptation in the Florida Keys: Conserving Terrestrial and Intertidal Natural Areas and Native Species A Workshop Synthesis August 2012 Sea Level Rise Adaptation in the Florida Keys: A Workshop Synthesis The Nature Conservancy’s Florida Chapter and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Florida Keys National Wildlife Refuges Complex co-sponsored a workshop to engage stakeholders in information sharing and facilitated discussions of research and monitoring needs and adaptive management strategies for minimizing the consequences of sea level rise on terrestrial and intertidal natural areas and native species in the Florida Keys. On May 10-12, 2011, 90 land managers, biologists, regulators, scientists and conservationists gathered at Hawks Cay Resort near Marathon, Florida, to share information about past, current and future research, monitoring and management efforts focused on sea level rise in the Florida Keys, to lay a foundation for an integrated research agenda and long-term monitoring network, and to begin identifying best management practices for adapting to sea level rise. Day one of the event included introductory presentations about climate change in general, impacts on peninsular Florida and impacts on the Florida Keys, followed by a “Managers’ Panel” comprised of public natural resource managers explaining their organization’s management approaches and issues. It also included field trips to middle and lower Keys natural areas where participants saw firsthand and discussed issues associated with sea level rise in this low-lying archipelago of limestone islands that support rich assemblages of plants and animals, some of which are endemic to the Keys and/or extremely rare, in addition to more than 70,000 permanent residents and millions of visitors each year.
  • American Alligator

    American Alligator

    American alligator Alligator mississippiensis (Photo by FWC) Taxonomic Classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Reptilia Order: Crocodila Family: Alligatoridae Genus/Species: Alligator mississippiensis Common Name: American alligator Listing Status Federal Status: Threatened (Similarity of Appearance to the American Crocodile) FL Status: Federally-designated Threatened (Similarity of Appearance) FNAI Ranks: G5/S4 (Globally: Demonstrably Secure/State: Apparently Secure). IUCN Status: LC (Least Concern) Physical Description The American alligator is a black reptile that can reach lengths of 13-14.7 feet (4-4.5 meters) and a weight in excess of 1,000 lbs (454 kilograms) (Florida Museum of Natural History, n.d.). A special feature of the alligator is its nostrils. The nostrils are upward facing on the long snout, which allows the alligator to breathe when its body is submerged (Smithsonian National Zoological Park, n.d.). Also, armored plates (scutes) cover the body. Alligators have a vertically flattened tail, and a light yellow throat and belly. Alligators are ectothermic (body temperature is externally regulated) and are generally active when external temperatures are 82-92°F (28-33°C). American Alligator 1 | Page They stop feeding when the external temperature drops to 70°F (21°C), and they will go dormant (inactive) at (55°F) 13°C. While in a dormant stage, they can be found in burrows. Life History Adult alligators are opportunistic feeders (they feed on what is available). Adults feed on small mammals, birds, fish, turtles, and snakes; juveniles feed on small fish, insects, and amphibians. In the Everglades, alligators primarily feed on apple snails (P. Moler pers.
  • Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves Management Plan

    Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves Management Plan

    Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves Management Plan Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves 1277 NE 79th Street Causeway • Miami, FL 33138 305.795.3486 • www.dep.state.fl.us/coastal/sites/biscayne/ Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS #235, Tallahassee, FL 32399 www.aquaticpreserves.org This publication funded in part through a grant agreement from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Coastal Management Program by a grant provided by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA07NOS4190071- CZ823 NA11NOS4190077-CM227. The views, statements, finding, conclusions, and recommendations expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Florida, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or any of its sub-agencies. February 2013 This tiny dwarf seahorse, no bigger than the size of the tip of a finger, is seen here effectively blending into his environment, along a bed of Laurencia sp., a macroalgae, and holding onto a blade of manatee grass. Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves Management Plan Includes: • Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve • Biscayne Bay - Cape Florida to Monroe County Line Aquatic Preserve Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserves 1277 NE 79th Street Causeway • Miami, FL 33138 305.795.3486 • www.dep.state.fl.us/coastal/sites/biscayne/ Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS #235, Tallahassee, FL 32399 www.aquaticpreserves.org The backdrop of the pristine and protected Bill Sadowski Critical Wildlife Area is the downtown Miami skyline.