DOCSLIB.ORG

Eleventh International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eleventh International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators Eleventh International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators Leiden, the Netherlands 9-11 September 2010 Book of Abstracts We wish to thank all authors for providing their abstract in the proper format. Furthermore we are greatful to Suze van der Luijt for preparing the documents so accurately. 2 Table of contents In alphabetical order of first author's surname Macro-level analysis of academic web performance: A country multidimensional ranking Aguillo, IF*1, Ortega, JL2 ........................................................................................11 Productivity differences across fields – a macro analysis Dag W. Aksnes*1, Kristoffer Rørstad2, Gunnar Sivertsen3, Fredrik Piro4 The Skewness of Science in 219 Sub-Fields and a Number of Aggregates Pedro Albarrán*, Juan A. Crespo**, Ignacio Ortuño*, and Javier Ruiz-Castillo*17 A time and field dependent h-type index for individual scientific performance measuring Lucy Amez ................................................................................................................18 Dynamic research profile visualisation using cluster transition Andersen JP*1, Schneider JW2 ................................................................................20 Individual Researchers’ Research Productivity: A Comparative Analysis of Counting Methods Éric Archambault,1 Vincent Larivière2 ....................................................................22 Exploring indicators of Open Innovation: The role of co-patents Andrea Azzola1, Paolo Landoni2, Bart Van Looy3...................................................25 Google Scholar Citations to Information and Library Science Journals Judit Bar-Ilan*1 .......................................................................................................28 Scholarly communication in business administration and management science: German-language vs. international journals Reinhard Baumgartner1, Schloegl Christian2..........................................................31 Fuel cells and battery technology in the age of electric vehicles: Have Europe and North America bet on the wrong horse? Alexandre Beaudet*1, Éric Archambault2, David Campbell3 ..................................34 Exploring the bibliometric and semantic nature of negative results Dominique Besagni1, Claire François1, Juan Gorraiz2, Christian Gumpenberger2, Ivana Roche1, Edgar Schiebel3, Martin Wieland2 ...................................................37 Knowledge Creation Process in an Emerging Economy in a Frontier Technology: A case study of Nanotechnology research in India Sujit Bhattacharya, Avinash Prasad Kshitij ............................................................41 Does scientific advancement lean on the shoulders of mediocre research? An investigation of the Ortega hypothesis Lutz Bornmann†, Félix de Moya Anegón$, Loet Leydesdorff# .................................43 Investing in future academics: results of a doctoral fellowship programme at Catalan universities Ángel Borrego, Maite Barrios, Anna Villarroya .....................................................46 Consistent bibliometric rankings of authors and of journals Denis Bouyssou1 and Thierry Marchant2 ...............................................................48 A Comparison of the Accuracy of Models for Mapping the Medical Sciences Kevin W. Boyack*1, Richard Klavans2 ....................................................................49 Spotlighting SciVal Spotlight: A Debate on Light and Shadow Kevin W. Boyack1, Juan Gorraiz2, Richard Klavans1, Wolfgang Mayer2, Ambros Wernisch2 .................................................................................................................52 Long term development of research groups/institutes Robert Braam...........................................................................................................54 Long-term research group dynamics reflected in science indicators. 3 Robert Braam* and Thed van Leeuwen**...............................................................56 The scientific basis of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: exploring a pinnacle of climate change research from the perspective of its knowledge base R.K Buter1................................................................................................................59 An alternative to WoS subject categories: redefining journal sets for closer alignment to a national classification scheme Butler, Linda* ..........................................................................................................62 Seed journal citation network maps: a method based on network theory Clara Calero-Medina and Thed N. van Leeuwen....................................................65 The Impacts of Academic Patenting on Paper Publication: A Quantity-Quality Examination Yuan-Chieh Chang; Phil Y. Yang; T.-F. Tsai-Lin ...................................................68 Identifying Core Patents by Citations, Bibliographic Coupling and Co-citation Dar-Zen Chen1, Yi-Shan Sung2, Chung-Huei Kuan3 ...............................................69 The Optimality Property of C-D Knowledge Production Function Bangwen Cheng1, Shumei Liu2, Linfen Shi1, Yali Wang1, Hongjin Yang1 and Jun Yang1........................................................................................................................71 The effect on the research community of the endorsement of SJR and SNIP by Scopus Lisa Colledge ...........................................................................................................74 Effects of the durability of citations over the impact of research teams Rodrigo Costas *1, Thed N. van Leeuwen2, Anthony F. J. van Raan3 .....................75 Order of authorship: effects of age and professional rank Rodrigo Costas*1, Maria Bordons2 .........................................................................77 Publications profile and international visibility in Communication Sciences in Switzerland Daniela De Filippo*1, Carole Probst*2, Benedetto Lepori*3..................................80 Towards Quality Measures for Bibliometric Indicators William Peter Dinkel1, Markus von Ins2 ..................................................................82 Scientometric journals in scientometric databases. Microlevel analysis of lost citations Ekaterina Dyachenko*1, Vladimir Pislyakov2 .........................................................84 A full coverage study of output in the social sciences and humanities (Flanders, 2000- 2009) Tim Engels*1, Nathalie Stevens2 ..............................................................................87 Why is Europe so efficient at producing scientific papers, and does this explain the European Paradox? P. Foland*1, R. D. Shelton2......................................................................................89 Proximity and collaborative Mode 2 knowledge production: The case of non- pharmaceutical Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus research in Europe Koen Frenken1, Sjoerd Hardeman2, Anne ter Wal3, Ron Boschma4........................91 The use of bibliometrics to estimate biomedical research expenditure Antonio García Romero1, Grant Lewison2 ..............................................................94 Technological Capacities of the European Union, 15 members (EU-15) and its Collaboration Profile with Latin American Countries Esther García-Carpintero*1, Armando Albert2 and Luis Plaza-Gomez3 ................96 Bibliometrics in the library, putting science into practice W. Gerritsma, M.E. Loman, J.M.S. Renkema, P.L. van der Togt, I.V. Veerman, M.G.P. van Veller ....................................................................................................98 The historical evolution of interdisciplinarity: 1900-2008 Yves Gingras*1, Vincent Larivière2 .......................................................................100 4 Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics Wolfgang Glänzel*,1,2, Bart Thijs1..........................................................................102 A new representation of relative first-citation times Wolfgang Glänzel1, Ronald Rousseau2 ..................................................................105 Articles vs proceedings papers: do they differ in research relevance and impact? Borja González-Albo Manglano; María Bordons Gangas....................................107 National Research Performances in Light of the Sixth EU Framework Programme Dr. Jürgen Güdler1, Dr. Miriam Henseler*2 .........................................................109 A Worldwide Ranking for 28 Scientific Fields Using Scopus Data, The SCIMAGO Ranking of Journals, Mean Citation Rates and High- and Low-Impact Indicators Vicente Guerrero-Botes; Félix de Moya-Anegón; Javier Ruiz-Castillo................111 Representation of scholarly activity as a multi-relational network: A case study Raf Guns1 ...............................................................................................................113 Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators Thomas Gurney1, Edwin Horlings2, Peter van den Besselaar3 ............................115 Journal Evaluation and Science 2.0: Using Social Bookmarks to Analyze Reader Perception Stefanie Haustein*1,2, Evgeni Golov2, Kathleen Luckanus2, Sabrina Reher2, Jens Terliesner2..............................................................................................................117 Multidimensional Journal Evaluation Stefanie Haustein*1,2 ..............................................................................................120
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Studies and Analysis of Reference Management Software: a Literature Review
    Studies and analysis of reference management software: a literature review Jesús Tramullas Ana Sánchez-Casabón {jesus,asanchez}@unizar.es Dept .of Library & Information Science, University of Zaragoza Piedad Garrido-Picazo [email protected] Dept. of Computer and Software Engineering, University of Zaragoza Abstract: Reference management software is a well-known tool for scientific research work. Since the 1980s, it has been the subject of reviews and evaluations in library and information science literature. This paper presents a systematic review of published studies that evaluate reference management software with a comparative approach. The objective is to identify the types, models, and evaluation criteria that authors have adopted, in order to determine whether the methods used provide adequate methodological rigor and useful contributions to the field of study. Keywords: reference management software, evaluation methods, bibliography. 1. Introduction and background Reference management software has been a useful tool for researchers since the 1980s. In those early years, tools were made ad-hoc, and some were based on the dBase II/III database management system (Bertrand and Bader, 1980; Kunin, 1985). In a short period of time a market was created and commercial products were developed to provide support to this type of information resources. The need of researchers to systematize scientific literature in both group and personal contexts, and to integrate mechanisms into scientific production environments in order to facilitate and expedite the process of writing and publishing research results, requires that these types of applications receive almost constant attention in specialized library and information science literature. The result of this interest is reflected, in bibliographical terms, in the publication of numerous articles almost exclusively devoted to describing, analyzing, and comparing the characteristics of several reference management software products (Norman, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: a Review and Framework
    Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework Item Type Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated) Authors Trant, Jennifer Citation Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework 2009-01, 10(1) Journal of Digital Information Journal Journal of Digital Information Download date 02/10/2021 03:25:18 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105375 Trant, Jennifer (2009) Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework. Journal of Digital Information 10(1). Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework J. Trant, University of Toronto / Archives & Museum Informatics 158 Lee Ave, Toronto, ON Canada M4E 2P3 jtrant [at] archimuse.com Abstract This paper reviews research into social tagging and folksonomy (as reflected in about 180 sources published through December 2007). Methods of researching the contribution of social tagging and folksonomy are described, and outstanding research questions are presented. This is a new area of research, where theoretical perspectives and relevant research methods are only now being defined. This paper provides a framework for the study of folksonomy, tagging and social tagging systems. Three broad approaches are identified, focusing first, on the folksonomy itself (and the role of tags in indexing and retrieval); secondly, on tagging (and the behaviour of users); and thirdly, on the nature of social tagging systems (as socio-technical frameworks). Keywords: Social tagging, folksonomy, tagging, literature review, research review 1. Introduction User-generated keywords – tags – have been suggested as a lightweight way of enhancing descriptions of on-line information resources, and improving their access through broader indexing. “Social Tagging” refers to the practice of publicly labeling or categorizing resources in a shared, on-line environment.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Good Reference Manager? A
    1 What Makes A Good Reference Manager? 2 Quantitative Analysis of Bibliography Management Applications 3 4 5 ∗ 6 ANONYMOUS AUTHOR(S) 7 Reference managers have been widely used by researchers and students. While previous performed qualitative analysis for reference 8 managers, it is unclear how to asses these tools quantitatively. In this paper, we attempted to quantify the physical and mental effort to 9 10 use a reference manager. Specifically, we use a keystroke and mouse move logger, RUI, to record and analyze the user’s activities and 11 approximate the physical and mental effort. We also use pre- and post-study surveys to keep track of the participant’s preferences and 12 experiences with reference managers, and also their self-reported task load (NASA TLX Index.) In this pilot work, we first collected 69 13 pre-study surveys from graduate students to understand their experience with reference managers, and then conducted user study 14 with 12 voluntary participants. Four common reference managers, Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote, and RefWorks, were included in our 15 study. The results show, for the same task, different software might require different levels of effort, and users generally preferthe 16 tools that require less effort. We also observe that although these reference managers share similar features, the differences intheir 17 18 presentation and organization matter. Factors such as pricing, cloud sync and accuracy of bibliography generation also influence the 19 preference of users. We conclude this work by providing a set of guidelines for users and developers. 20 CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing ! Usability testing; Activity centered design.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendeley Reader Counts for US Computer Science Conference
    1 Mendeley Reader Counts for US Computer Science Conference Papers and Journal articles1 Mike Thelwall, Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group, University of Wolverhampton, UK. Although bibliometrics are normally applied to journal articles when used to support research evaluations, conference papers are at least as important in fast-moving computing- related fields. It is therefore important to assess the relative advantages of citations and altmetrics for computing conference papers to make an informed decision about which, if any, to use. This paper compares Scopus citations with Mendeley reader counts for conference papers and journal articles that were published between 1996 and 2018 in 11 computing fields and had at least one US author. The data showed high correlations between Scopus citation counts and Mendeley reader counts in all fields and most years, but with few Mendeley readers for older conference papers and few Scopus citations for new conference papers and journal articles. The results therefore suggest that Mendeley reader counts have a substantial advantage over citation counts for recently-published conference papers due to their greater speed, but are unsuitable for older conference papers. Keywords: Altmetrics; Mendeley; Scientometrics; Computer Science; Computing; Conference papers 1 Introduction Altmetrics, social media indicators for the impact of academic research derived from the web (Priem, Taraborelli, Groth, & Neylon, 2010), are now widely available to help assess academic outputs. Altmetric.com, for example, collects a range of data about online mentions of academic documents, supplying it to journal publishers to display in article pages, to institutions to help them analyse their work and to researchers to track the impact of their publications (Adie & Roe, 2013; Liu & Adie, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Module Five - Management of Information
    Module Five - Management of Information Introduction “Where did I read this information?”, “I know that I printed a copy of this article, but I don't remember where I kept it.” These are very common situations among researchers, students or anybody whose works involve using documents. In the course of learning, teaching and research, information accessed from diverse sources accumulates. Without a proper information management practice; such information may be difficult to find and later locate. In certain instance some people may print the same documents again and again, or search for the same information every time they need it. As a consequence there is a need for this information to be organized so that it becomes easily accessible. Managing this information properly will save time, energy and lead to increased productivity. This module discusses tools and techniques for collecting, storing, organizing and using information. Special attention will be given to the management of the following categories of information: bibliographic references, primary documents such as books or articles, user’s notes and manuscripts. Learning Objectives In this module we will: • Explain the benefits of good organization of information, • Present referenced management tools, • present bookmark management tools, • Discuss information management techniques. Learning Outcomes At the end of the module, one should be able to: • Understand the importance of managing information, • Use a reference management software for storing bibliographic references, •
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Management Software (Rms) in an Academic Environment: a Survey at a Research University in Malaysia
    Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 10 th June 2016. Vol.88. No.1 © 2005 - 2016 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved . ISSN: 1992-8645 www.jatit.org E-ISSN: 1817-3195 REFERENCE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE (RMS) IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT: A SURVEY AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY IN MALAYSIA 1MOHAMMAD OSMANI, 2ROZAN MZA, 3BAKHTYAR ALI AHMAD, 4ARI SABIR ARIF 1 Department of Management, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran 2 Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor, Malaysia 3 Faculty of Geo Information and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor, Malaysia 4 Faculty of Physical and Basic Education, University of Sulaimani (UOS), Sulaimani, Iraq E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Reference Management Software is used by researchers in academics to manage the bibliographic citations they encounter in their research. With these tools, scholars keep track of the scientific literature they read, and to facilitate the editing of the scientific papers they write. This study presents the results of a quantitative survey performed at a research university in Malaysia. The aims of the survey were to observe how much these softwares are used by the scientific community, to see which softwares are most known and used, and to find out the reasons and the approaches behind their usage. Manually questionnaire was distributed to the Master and PhD students at all faculties in Jun 2014. The data collected were analysed through a constant comparative analysis, and the following categories were drawn: a basic practical approach to the instrument, the heavy impact of the time factor, the force of habit in scholars, economic issues, the importance of training and literacy, and the role that the library can have in this stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluación De Software Libre Para La Gestión De Bibliografía
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-LIS Evaluación de software libre para la gestión de bibliografía Mónica Giménez López Jesús Tramullas Saz Resumen Las herramientas sociales de gestión de bibliografía están emergiendo rápidamente en la web. En este trabajo se lleva a cabo una evaluación de las herramientas de gestión bibliográfica más reconocidas existentes en la red. Al tratarse de herramientas libres y open source, se pretende elegir la mejor para desarrollar un servicio de gestión de bibliografías en castellano. Palabras clave Gestión bibliográfica, software libre, redes sociales, web 2.0., web semántica, Abstract The Social Tools in bibliography management are growing really fast on the Internet. In this project we’re going to evaluate the most popular management bibliography tools known. We’re going to select the best open source tool in order to develop a bibliography management service in Spanish Castilian. Keywords Bibliography management, free software, open source, social network, web 2.0., semantic web 1. Introducción Este trabajo pretende hacer una evaluación de varias herramientas de gestión bibliográfica que existen en la red, y que permiten importar, organizar, exportar, editar y compartir referencias bibliográficas, así como crear bibliografías personales y darle formato. Entre la amplia variedad de herramientas de gestión bibliográfica, disponibles, se han seleccionado las siguientes: • Bibsonomy ( http://www.bibsonomy.org ) • CiteuLike ( http://www.citeulike.org ) • Connotea ( www.connotea.org ) • Refbase ( http://refbase.sourceforge.net ) • Wikindx ( http://wikindx.sourceforge.net/ ) • Zotero ( http://www.zotero.org/ ) Se han analizado las características y capacidades que pueden interesar desde un punto de vista documental.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War and the East-West Battle for Information Superiority, 1945 - 1969
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Empowering The neE my: The oldC War And The East-West Battle orF Information Superiority, 1945 - 1969 Stan Trembach University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Trembach, S.(2016). Empowering The Enemy: The Cold War And The East-West Battle For Information Superiority, 1945 - 1969. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3882 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EMPOWERING THE ENEMY: THE COLD WAR AND THE EAST-WEST BATTLE FOR INFORMATION SUPERIORITY, 1945 - 1969 by Stan Trembach Bachelor of Arts Samara State Pedagogical University, 2002 Master of Arts Clemson University, 2004 Master of Library Science University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, 2006 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Library and Information Science College of Information and Communications University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Samantha K. Hastings, Major Professor R. David Lankes, Committee Member Patricia E. Feehan, Committee Member Charles Bierbauer, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Stan Trembach, 2016 All Rights Reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people whose contributions have made this work possible. I would like to thank my Dissertation Committee: Samantha K. Hastings (Chair), R. David Lankes, Patricia E.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Techniques in Network and Information Technologies, February
    Tools to support research M. Antonia Huertas Sánchez PID_00185350 CC-BY-SA • PID_00185350 Tools to support research The texts and images contained in this publication are subject -except where indicated to the contrary- to an Attribution- ShareAlike license (BY-SA) v.3.0 Spain by Creative Commons. This work can be modified, reproduced, distributed and publicly disseminated as long as the author and the source are quoted (FUOC. Fundació per a la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya), and as long as the derived work is subject to the same license as the original material. The full terms of the license can be viewed at http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es/legalcode.ca CC-BY-SA • PID_00185350 Tools to support research Index Introduction............................................................................................... 5 Objectives..................................................................................................... 6 1. Management........................................................................................ 7 1.1. Databases search engine ............................................................. 7 1.2. Reference and bibliography management tools ......................... 18 1.3. Tools for the management of research projects .......................... 26 2. Data Analysis....................................................................................... 31 2.1. Tools for quantitative analysis and statistics software packages ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Rtigo De R Evisão
    ANÁLISE DAS IDEIAS DE A. I. MIKHAILOV SOBRE O IMPACTO E A UTILIZAÇÃO DAS NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS NA CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO (1977-1986) Roberto Lopes dos Santos Junior Doutor em Ciência da Informação Professor da Faculdade de Arquivologia Universidade Federal do Pará [email protected] de Revisão Artigo Resumo Análise das ideias do pesquisador soviético Alexander Ivanovich Mikhailov (1905-1988) sobre as novas tecnologias e seu papel e impacto na sociedade contemporânea e na Ciência da Informação. A pesquisa baseou-se em levantamento bibliográfico e revisão de literatura em periódicos russos, norte-americanos e europeus, centralizados na produção bibliográfica de Mikhailov, no período entre 1977 e 1986. Inicialmen- te, o artigo fez breve análise histórica sobre o desenvolvimento da Ciência da Informação e da Ciência da computação na antiga União Soviética. Posteriormente, o trabalho discorreu sobre a abordagem de Mi- khailov sobre as novas tecnologias, apresentando aspectos teóricos sobre a relação da Ciência da Informa- ção com essas tecnologias, e dos projetos e iniciativas de automação e mecanização da informação cientí- fica na antiga União Soviética. A pesquisa identificou que a abordagem de Mikhailov a essas temáticas mostrou-se coerente e apresentou consistência, mesmo que, em algumas partes, tenha-se percebido um inevitável envelhecimento. Palavras-chave A. I. Mikhailov. Novas tecnologias. Informatika / Ciência da Informação. 1 INTRODUÇÃO termos de estudo da informação em âmbito internacional (SANTOS JUNIOR; PI- O campo de estudo relacionado
    [Show full text]
  • Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools William Marino Eastern Michigan University, [email protected]
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU University Library Faculty Scholarship University Library 1-1-2012 Fore-cite: Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools William Marino Eastern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/lib_sch Recommended Citation Marino, William, "Fore-cite: Tactics for Evaluating Citation Management Tools" (2012). University Library Faculty Scholarship. Paper 7. http://commons.emich.edu/lib_sch/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Library at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact lib- [email protected]. Fore-cite: tactics for evaluating citation management tools Introduction Once upon a time, there was a very limited set of options regarding citation management software, and this set was well understood to the trained mind and did what it was meant to do, and that was good. A leader, Endnote, arose among that set and was consequently supported by academic libraries and other research institutions across the world, who merrily spread the word that technology was breaking the age- long chains of paper’s tyranny—at least when it came to storing and sorting one’s references. As the internet matured, with the advent of Web 2.0 and cloud computing, this set began to expand and the environment began to change. Increased functionality and flexibility meant that users began to question the hegemony of the leader. Librarians, those champions of information, began to develop comparisons to assist users with the gnawing decision of which tool was best.
    [Show full text]
  • Citeulike – Connotea
    2Collab – Bibsonomy – citeulike – Connotea LARDY Jean-Pierre URFIST de LYON - UCBL http://urfist.univ-lyon1.fr DADI : http://dadi.enssib.fr Maj : mai 2010 CiteUlike, Connotea, BibSonomy et 2collab sont un type particulier de services de bookmarking social, d’aide à la gestion de collections de références bibliographiques. Gratuits, il s utilisent le principe du "social bookmarking" dont le plus connu est Delicious, pour aider les chercheurs à conserver et partager leurs références bibliographiques. Ces services ne gèrent pas le texte intégral des articles. De plus en plus de plateformes de journaux électroniques proposent des boutons pour récupérer les références d’articles : exemple d’edpSciences. Les utilisateurs peuvent décrire les ressources avec des mots-clés arbitraires, appelés tags ou étiquettes. Ces services ne sont pas interfacés avec les logiciels de traitement de texte mais on peut utiliser Zotero comme intermédiaire. Nom Origine Date de lancement Coût Open 2collab Elsevier Nov 2007 Gratuit Non BibSonomy Université de Kassel Jan 2006 Gratuit Oui CiteULike Oversity Ltd Springer Nov 2004 Gratuit Non Connotea Nature Publishing Déc 2004 Gratuit Oui Volumétrie Nom Vus par Google Vus par Exalead annoncé 2collab références signets 22 400 BibSonomy références signets 366 000 73 000 CiteULike références 565 000 166 350 1 970 000 Connotea références signets 56 200 71 500 L’importation de signets est facilitée par la possibilité d’installer des plugins dans le navigateur. Nom 2collab http://www.2collab.com/addtocollabFF?version=3 BibSonomy http://www.bibsonomy.org/help/basic/buttons CiteULike http://www.citeulike.org/post Connotea http://www.connotea.org/bookmarklets LARDY Jean-Pierre URFIST de LYON 1 2collab http://www.2collab.com Lancé par Elsevier en novembre 2007.
    [Show full text]