Have Free Markets Failed Us?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Have Free Markets Failed Us? JARGONALERT RESEARCHSPOTLIGHT Underemployment Have Free Markets Failed Us? BY DAVID VAN DEN BERG BY STEPHEN SLIVINSKI he monthly unemployment rate most people are Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. For general audiences, the s it merely a coincidence that living standards rose countries adopting them. For instance, these economists familiar with tracks people who are out of work and fact that the official unemployment rate follows the same sharply and absolute poverty declined while the world do not necessarily look askance at capital controls or see Tsearching for new jobs. However, it’s only one of trend as alternative unemployment figures makes things Iembraced free market policies beginning in 1980? price stability as an important precondition to economic six measures of unemployment published by the Bureau easy, says Faberman. “For a lay person, what this tells you is That’s the question Harvard University economist Andrei growth. of Labor Statistics (BLS). The BLS also produces a broader that looking at the unemployment number is going to give Shleifer ponders in this essay. A recent book co-authored by Stiglitz, surveyed by measurement, sometimes referred to as the “underem- you the same story in relative terms as looking at the under- He names the period between 1980 and 2005 as the “Age Shleifer in this essay, seeks to make the case for significant ployment rate” or the “U-6 rate” after the dataset on which employment number.” Because they move in the same of Milton Friedman” to acknowledge the adoption — state intervention in developing economies. Yet, Shleifer it is based. The U-6 rate, according to the BLS, includes the direction, both numbers will tell the same general story over at least in modified form — of many of the late Nobel argues, the evidence offered is not persuasive. On inflation, officially unemployed plus all marginally attached workers time, Faberman says. laureate’s market-oriented proposals. The policies pursued for instance, their argument often amounts to a straw man, and people employed part-time for economic reasons as a Unemployment measures and other labor market indica- in that spirit include capital market deregulation, the Shleifer maintains. Stiglitz and his co-authors see advocates share of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached tors are derived from data generated by the Current lowering of trade barriers, inflation-conscious monetary of zero inflation as their main opposition when that point of workers. Through June 2009, the underemployment rate Population Survey (CPS), sent to 60,000 households a policy, the adoption of flexible exchange rates, and tax cuts. view isn’t held by most market-oriented economists, who reached 16.5 percent, the highest since the BLS redesigned month. Before the 1994 changes to the survey, the BLS sent It’s hard to argue that these policies didn’t at least argue that a certain level of inflation might need to be toler- its unemployment figures and created the the old and new versions of the question- have some positive effect. As Shleifer points out, they corre- ated, at least in the short run. Meanwhile, Stiglitz and his U-6 in 1994. In 1993 the BLS stopped the naire simultaneously between July 1992 sponded to substantial increases co-authors are incautious when U-7 data set, which was previously its and December 1993. The new question- in the rate of growth in per-capita they “express little concern for broadest measure of unemployment. naire produced an unemployment rate GDP worldwide and it’s quite “The Age of Milton Friedman” by the huge costs that high inflation Workers classified as “marginally half a percentage point higher for 1993. likely that they were the main has brought to countries that lost attached” and “discouraged workers” are Survey participants faced more exten- drivers of the growth. The Andrei Shleifer. Journal of Economic control of their fiscal policy, included in the underemployment calcula- sive questioning under the new countries for which market liber- Literature, March 2009, vol. 47, including many Latin American tion. They are typically just a small portion questionnaire, which generally registered alization policies provided the and transition economies.” of the people outside the labor force as more labor force activity, especially for best relative return were those no. 1, pp. 123-135. Stiglitz and his co-authors also measured by the BLS, which defines the workers who traditionally have more that were once the most heavily favor capital controls as a way to labor force as the sum of all employed and part-time or irregular work force partici- regulated, such as the countries stem swings in speculative capital unemployed people. Employed people per- pation. That’s why the new survey yielded of East and South Asia. (Aggregate growth trends mask a investment. As Shleifer notes, they lean heavily on the exam- formed any work for pay or profit during a higher labor force participation rate. It few key differences between regions. Rapid growth in Asia ple of Malaysia as a country that imposed such controls and the survey week, did at least 15 hours of also revealed longer durations of unem- towers above slow growth in Latin America and stagnation was able to escape the Asian financial crisis of the 1990s. Yet unpaid work in a family-owned business, or ployment, a higher proportion of in Africa.) that example is still controversial as recent analysis has were absent from work because of bad weather, illness, vaca- unemployed people re-entering the work force, and a lower The triumph over runaway inflation and high punitive failed to find that these controls had macro-economic bene- tion, industrial disputes, or various personal reasons. People proportion of new entrants. tax rates was evident during the Age of Friedman. The world fits. Instead, Shleifer suggests that such controls encouraged who do not have a job but have actively searched for one in Because the U-6 was first published in 1996, it is not pos- median annual inflation rate declined from 14.3 percent in misallocation of capital and political corruption. the last four weeks and are immediately available for work sible to compare recent underemployment rates to those in 1980 to 4.1 percent in 2005. Marginal income tax rates Shleifer reminds us that we must be careful to learn are counted as unemployed. earlier severe downturns such as the 1982 recession. For dropped from the population-weighted average of 65 per- the right lessons from the experiences of developing Typically most people not in the labor force do not seek instance, marginally attached workers were not included in cent in 1980 to 36.7 percent in 2005. economies. The transition to a more free market system employment because they’re retired, attending to family unemployment measures prior to the 1994 redesign. The BLS Markets became more international in scope due to a “has taught us that economic and political disorganization, responsibilities, going to school, or are physically unable also tightened the definition of discouraged workers, which weakening of trade barriers too. Tariff rates fell from the combined with obsolete human capital of both economic work. The marginally attached are neither employed nor reduced their numbers considerably after the CPS redesign. population-weighted world average of 43 percent in 1980 to agents and politicians, can sharply slow down the economic looking for work but have sought work in the past year and However, one element of the underemployment rate can be 13 percent in 2004. As formal goods markets become more turnaround.” The other obvious problem facing the devel- are available immediately. Family responsibilities or trans- compared to earlier downturns — the level of involuntary free, black market activity declined. oping world now, he writes, is the lack of new business portation concerns can keep marginally attached workers part-time workers. That figure, which can be traced back to The benefits of abandoning dirigistic policies have investment — a phenomenon that must be tied to the lack out of the work force. Discouraged workers are not 1955, is higher today than at any point since then. become clear to many in the developed world and this, in of institutional barriers to arbitrary political power which employed and not seeking work because they believe noth- Over time, the gap between unemployment and under- turn, has raised people’s hopes and expectations. Shleifer spawns predatory regulatory and fiscal policies. ing is available for them. employment rates has remained fairly constant in recounts a trip he took to Chile a decade ago. At that time, “On strategy, economics got the right answer: free All six unemployment measures the Bureau of Labor percentage terms, according to BLS data. However, the the ambition of policymakers was to overtake Argentina. In market policies, supported but not encumbered by the Statistics publishes follow a similar pattern: Both the under- severity of the current recession could produce some signif- 2007, policymakers wanted to match the growth of Australia government, deliver growth and prosperity,” Shleifer con- employment and unemployment rates move in the same icant short-term structural changes in the labor market. OOK and New Zealand. cludes. “And while a lot has been accomplished in the last direction. What is perhaps most relevant to economic Monitoring the unemployment and underemployment rates THY C Yet some scholars, most notably Columbia University quarter century, a lot remains to be done.” In short, the prin- researchers is how these measures move relative to each will be important both during the current downturn and the economist and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, remain ciples to which Milton Friedman devoted his career can TION: TIMO other, says Jason Faberman, an economist at the Federal recovery following it.
Recommended publications
  • The Business Cycle and the Stock Market
    -1- THE BUSINESS CYCLE AND THE STOCK MARKET by Andrei S leifer A.B., Harv d University (1982) SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 1986 Andrei Shleifer 1986 The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of author__ Department of Economics May 12, 1986 Certified by Peter A. Diamond / Thesis Supervisor Certified by Franklin M. Fisher / Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Richard S. Eckaus Chairman, Departmental Graduate Committee ARCHIVES MASSACHUSETT SIN!TiTUTE OF TCHNN N1'' JUN 1 3 198E LIBRA";. - - 2 ABSTRACT The three essays of this thesis concern the role of expectations in determining the allocation of resources, particularly in the macroecono- mic context. Specifically, all three papers are motivated by the propo- sition that private agents' beliefs are aggregated into stock market prices, which can therefore influence the allocation of investment. The first essay does not deal with financial markets explicitly, although it explores the role of animal spirits in determining invest- ment. The essay describes an artificial economy, in which firms in dif- ferent sectors make inventions at different times, but innovate simultaneously to take advantage of high aggregate demand. In turn, high demand results from simultaneous innovation in many sectors. The economy exhibits multiple cyclical equilibria, with entrepreneurs' expectations determining which equilibrium obtains. These equilibria are Pareto ranked, and the most profitable equilibrium need not be the most effi- cient.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREI SHLEIFER 1 March 2019
    ANDREI SHLEIFER 1 March 2019 ANDREI SHLEIFER Department of Economics Harvard University M9 Littauer Center Cambridge, MA 02138 Date of Birth: February 20, 1961 Citizenship: U.S.A. Undergraduate Studies: Harvard, A.B., Math, 1982. Graduate Studies: MIT, Ph.D., May, 1986. Thesis Title: “The Business Cycle and the Stock Market” EMPLOYMENT: John L. Loeb Professor of Economics, Harvard University, 1991 - present. Professor of Finance and Business Economics, Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago, 1989 - 1990. Assistant Professor of Finance and Business Economics, Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago, 1987 - 1989. Assistant Professor of Economics, Princeton University, 1986 - 1987. OTHER AFFILIATIONS: Faculty Research Fellow and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1986- Associate and Advisory Editor, Journal of Financial Economics, 1988 - . Associate Editor, Journal of Finance, 1988 - 1991. Editor, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989 - 1999, 2012 - Advisor, Government of Russia, 1991 - 1997. Principal, LSV Asset Management, 1994 - 2003. Editor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003 - 2008. ANDREI SHLEIFER 2 March 2019 AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, AND GRANTS: National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship, 1983 - 1986. CRSP Distinguished Visiting Scholar, Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago, March-June, 1986. Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship, 1990. National Science Foundation Grants, 1988 - 1989, 1990 - 1991, 19 94 - 1996, 1998 - 2000, 2001 - 2003. Presidential Young Investigator Award, 1989 - 1994. Bradley Foundation Grant, 1989, 1990, 1991 - 1992. Russell Sage Foundation Grant (with R. Vishny), 1988, 1991. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant (with L. Summers), 1986, 1988 - 1990. Fellow, Econometric Society, 1993. Roger F. Murray Award of the Q-Group, 1994, and the Smith-Breeden Prize of the Journal of Finance for Distinguished paper, 1995, given to “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk.” Member, U.S.-Israel Joint Economic Development Group, 1995 - 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Shleifer's Failure
    Shleifer’s Failure THE FAILURE OF JUDGES AND THE RISE OF REGULATORS. By Andrei Shleifer. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2012. 352 pages. $40.00. Reviewed by Jonathan Klick* I. Introduction Andrei Shleifer is undoubtedly among the world’s most important economists. By standard citation measures, no one else is anywhere close. For example, his nearly 19,000 citations in the RePEc rankings1 as of October 2012 place him ahead of Nobel Prize2 winners such as James Heckman (12,212),3 Joseph Stiglitz (11,431),4 and Robert Lucas (9,314).5 His work on corporate finance, behavioral finance, and transition economics earned him the American Economic Association’s prestigious John Bates Clark medal in 1999.6 Perhaps not even international scandal will keep Shleifer from taking his place among the Nobelists.7 Shleifer’s influence in legal scholarship is almost as large. With more than 1,000 Westlaw citations,8 Shleifer would compare favorably to most law and economics specialists in top U.S. law schools.9 Given all of this, the publication of Shleifer’s book The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators10 as part of the MIT Press’s Walras-Pareto Lecture series is sure to be of interest to a wide range of legal scholars, students, and policy makers—and especially to those who do not have access to JSTOR11 and a * Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania. 1. Top 5% Authors, as of October 2012, IDEAS, http://ideas.repec.org/top/top .person.nbcites.html. 2. Formally the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, NOBELPRIZE.ORG, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics, but only pedants note this, such as bloggers who disagree with a given Nobelist’s positions.
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES a NORMAL COUNTRY Andrei
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A NORMAL COUNTRY Andrei Shleifer Daniel Treisman Working Paper 10057 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10057 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2003 We thank Anders Aslund, Olivier Blanchard, Maxim Boycko, David Cutler, Martin Feldstein, Sergei Guriev, Stephen Hanson, Simon Johnson, David Laibson, Dwight Perkins, Lawrence Summers, Judith Thornton, Katia Zhuravskaya, and participants at a seminar at the University of Washington. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2003 by Andrei Shleifer and Daniel Treisman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. A Normal Country Andrei Shleifer and Daniel Treisman NBER Working Paper No. 10057 October 2003 JEL No. P2, P3, P5 ABSTRACT During the 1990s, Russia underwent an extraordinary transformation from a communist dictatorship to a multi-party democracy, from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, and from a belligerent adversary of the West to a cooperative partner. Yet a consensus in the US circa 2000 viewed Russia as a disastrous and threatening failure, and the 1990s as a decade of catastrophe for its citizens. Analyzing a variety of economic and political data, we demonstrate a large gap between this perception and the facts. In contrast to the common image, by the late 1990s Russia had become a typical middle-income capitalist democracy. Andrei Shleifer Harvard University Department of Economics M9Littauer Center Cambridge, MA 02138 and NBER [email protected] Daniel Treisman University of California, Los Angeles Political Science Department 3265 Bunche Hall Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472 [email protected] 1 Introduction During the 1990s, Russia underwent an extraordinary transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Higher Prices Stimulate Product Use? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Zambia
    Can Higher Prices Stimulate Product Use? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Zambia Nava Ashraf James Berry Jesse M. Shapiro Working Paper 07-034 Copyright © 2006, 2007, 2008 by Nava Ashraf, James Berry, and Jesse M. Shapiro Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Can Higher Prices Stimulate Product Use? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Zambia Nava Ashraf James Berry Harvard Business School Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jesse M. Shapiro University of Chicago and NBER August 14, 2008 Abstract The controversy over whether and how much to charge for health products in the developing world rests, in part, on whether higher prices can increase use, either by targeting distribution to high-use households (a screening e¤ect), or by stimulating use psychologically through a sunk-cost e¤ect. We develop a methodology for separating these two e¤ects. We implement the methodology in a …eld experiment in Zambia using door-to-door marketing of a home water puri…cation solution. We …nd that higher prices screen out those who use the product less. By contrast, we …nd no consistent evidence of sunk-cost e¤ects. JEL classi…cation: C93, D12, L11, L31 Keywords: chlorination, water-borne diseases, sunk-cost e¤ect, non-pro…t strategy, social marketing We are grateful to Gary Becker, Stefano DellaVigna, Dave Donaldson, Erik Eyster, Matthew Gentzkow, Jerry Green, Ali Hortaçsu, Emir Kamenica, Dean Karlan, Larry Katz, Michael Kremer, Stephen Leider, Steve Levitt, John List, Kevin M.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Working Papers\7804.Wpd
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
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Milton Friedman
    Journal of Economic Literature 2009, 47:1, 123–135 http:www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.123 The Age of Milton Friedman Andrei Shleifer* Between 1980 and 2005, as the world embraced free market policies, living stan- dards rose sharply, while life expectancy, educational attainment, and democracy improved and absolute poverty declined. Is this a coincidence? A collection of essays edited by Balcerowicz and Fischer argues that indeed reliance on free market forces is key to economic growth. A book by Stiglitz and others disagrees. I review and com- pare the two arguments. 1. Introduction also embraced free market policies. All three of these leaders professed inspiration from he last quarter century has witnessed the work of Milton Friedman. It is natural, Tremarkable progress of mankind. The then, to refer to the last quarter century as world’s per capita inflation-adjusted income the Age of Milton Friedman. rose from $5,400 in 1980 to $8,500 in 2005. The association between free mar- Schooling and life expectancy grew rapidly, ket policies and social progress notwith- while infant mortality and poverty fell just standing, economists remain divided in as fast. Compared to 1980, many more coun- their assessments of this Age. Two recent tries in the world are democratic today. books illustrate the divisions. A collection The last quarter century also saw wide of papers edited by Leszek Balcerowicz acceptance of free market policies in both and Stanley Fischer—Living Standards rich and poor countries: from private own- and the Wealth of Nations: Successes and ership, to free trade, to responsible budgets, Failures in Real Convergence (MIT Press, to lower taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrei Shleifer Murphy Kevin M
    Epstein Larry G Hynes J Allan Karni Edi Smith V Kerry Bolton Patrick Anna L. Paulson Lach Saul Robin Brooks Robert M. Townsend Jeremy Bulow Isabel Correia Bresnahan Timothy F Rosemary Avery Joseph G. Altonji Peterson David W Chen Chau-nan Bhagwan Chowdhry Lars Peter Hansen Stern Robert M Bertin Amy L Weingast Barry R Alan Mathios Cabreales Antonio Lang Larry H P Donald Kenkel Barton H. Hamilton Zuber Richard A Hugo Hopenhayn Robert B. Ekelund Jr. Michael Greenstone David Dranove Saks Daniel H Deaton Angus Findlay Ronald Philip DeCicca Cropper Maureen L. Shiller Robert J Assaf Razin Harold G. Moulton Dooley Martin D S. Lawrence Bigelow Francesco Drago Robert D. Tollison Greif Avner Myron W. Watkins C. Arnold Anderson Tai-wei Hu Alon Brav Whalley John Bruno Biais Postlewaite Andrew Tano Santos Sanjeev Goyal Cole Harold L Ehrenberg Ronald G Day Richard H Neumann George R Harrison Glenn W Ricardo J. Caballero Thomas Sargent Christina Paxson J. David Brown Bhattacharya Sudipto McMillan John Jonathan M. Karpoff Rucker Randal R Bronars Stephen G Luigi Guiso Hubbard R Glenn Diebold Francis X Wolfe Barbara L Lior Menzly Leffler Keith B Luigi Pistaferri Paul Gomme Friedman Daniel Lewis Tracy R Stiglitz Joseph E Wellisz Stanislaw Hoffer George E Firms Zeckhauser Richard J Eswaran Mukesh Orazio P. Attanasio Thomas Cooley Hodrick Robert J Kerwin Kofi Charles Vernon Henderson John Knowles Blair Douglas H Schwert G William Deaton Angus S Zellner Arnold Rothkopf Michael H Wolpin Kenneth I Michael Mann French Kenneth R Michael P. Keane Cass DavidMilgrom Paul Hansen Lars Peter Frey Bruno S StarkRosenzweig Oded Mark R Andrew W.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE José A
    November, 2015 CURRICULUM VITAE José A. Scheinkman Department of Economics Columbia University ACADEMIC BACKGROUND B.A. in Economics (1969) Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. M.S. in Mathematics (1970) Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada, Brazil. M.A. in Economics (1973) University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. Ph.D. in Economics (1974) University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. HONORS Fellow, Econometric Society (elected 1978). Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1992). Docteur honoris causa, Université Paris-Dauphine (2001). Blaise Pascal Chair, France (2002). Fellow, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (2007). Member, National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008), Chair of Section 54 (Economic Sciences) (2012- 2015). Corresponding Member, Brazilian Academy of Sciences (elected 2012) CME Group-MSRI Prize in Innovative Quantitative Applications (2014) ACADEMIC POSITIONS Present Positions: Columbia University: Charles and Lynn Zhang Professor of Economics 2015- Princeton University: Theodore A. Wells '29 Professor of Economics Emeritus 2013- Past Positions: Columbia University: Edwin W. Rickert Professor of Economics 2013-2015. Princeton University: Theodore A. Wells '29 Professor of Economics 1999- 2013. University of Chicago: Alvin H. Baum Distinguished Service Professor of Economics, 1997-1999, Chairman of Department of Economics, 1995-1998, Alvin H. Baum Professor of Economics, 1987-1997, Professor of Economics, 1981-1986, Associate Professor of Economics, 1976-1981, Assistant Professor of Economics, 1973-1976, Post- Doctoral Fellow in Political Economy, 1973-1974. Visiting Professorships: Collège de France, 2008; EHESS (Paris), 2003-2004; Princeton University, 1998; CEREMADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1985- 1994; EPGE, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Rio de Janeiro) 1978-1979; Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada (Rio de Janeiro), 1978-1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Prize in Economics
    The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science is set to be announced on PRIZE IN Monday. The contenders include Jean Tirole, Bengt Holmstrom, Oliver Hart, Robert Barro, Paul Romer, Avinash Dixit, Angus Deaton, Lars Peter Hansen, NOBELECONOMICS William Baumol, Robert Shiller, Richard Thaler, Andrei Shleifer, William Nordhaus, Douglas Diamond, Alan Krueger, David Card, Joshua Angrist, Jerry THE LAUREATES Hausman and Eugene Fama. A look at the winners through the last 10 years 2012 2011 Alvin E Roth LLOYD S SHAPLEY Born: 18 December, 1951, US Born: 2 June, 1923, US Affiliation at the time of Affiliation at the time the award: Harvard of the award: University, Cambridge, MA, University of USA, Harvard Business California, Los School, Boston, MA, USA Angeles, CA, US For the theory of stable allocations and the practice of market design Thomas J Sargent 2010 2009 Born: 1943, US Affiliation at the time of the Elinor Ostrom Peter A Diamond award: New York University, Born: 29 April, 1940, US Born: 7 August, 1933, US New York, NY, US Affiliation at the Affiliation at the time of the award: Christopher A Sims time of the Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, award: US, Arizona State University, Tempe, Born: 1942, US Massachusetts AZ, US Affiliation at the Institute of For her analysis of economic governance, especially the commons time of the Technology award: (MIT), Cambridge, Oliver E Williamson Princeton MA, US Born: 27 September, 1932, US University, Affiliation at the time of the award: Princeton, NJ, Dale T Mortensen University of California,
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Economist Andrei Shleifer Joins SKEMA As a Visiting Professor
    Press Release Harvard economist Andrei Shleifer joins SKEMA as a Visiting Professor One of the world’s leading economists, this eminent professor will conduct post- COVID-19 research on finance and growth at SKEMA Business School for the academic year. Sophia Antipolis, December, 9: He is the world's most highly cited economist for his research work. He has taken a year leave from the Harvard campus, where he has been teaching since 1991, to join SKEMA as a visiting professor. Alice Guilhon, SKEMA’s dean, is delighted with his arrival: "Andrei is recognised as one of the world's leading economists. He can make a significant contribution to SKEMA's research, particularly in the crucial area of French and European post-COVID-19 financial and economic recovery." Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, associate dean for academic strategy at SKEMA and professor of finance and economics, with whom Andrei Shleifer will continue to work, underlines a historic cooperation between them: "We have been co-authors for over 25 years, starting at Harvard where we spent several years together and help create the area of "Law and Finance." The economists will work together this year from the assignment is from September 15, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Based at the Sophia Antipolis campus, his research work will give him access to SKEMA's resources from its three sites in France. Helping leaders to boost growth The economists will work together this year at SKEMA on several research projects. One of these projects will study the factors that determine investment and are at the origin of macroeconomic development and employment growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard H. Thaler
    RICHARD H. THALER Chicago Booth School of Business: 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 Phone: 773‐702‐5208 ▪ Fax: 773‐702‐0013 ▪ [email protected] Charles R. Walgreen Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics, Booth Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago. Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research PERSONAL DATA Born: September 12, 1945; East Orange, New Jersey EDUCATION Ph.D. University of Rochester, 1974 M.A. University of Rochester, 1970 B.A. Case Western Reserve University, 1967 Dissertation Title: "The Value of Saving A Life: A Market Estimate" Supervisor: Sherwin Rosen HONORS Nobel Prize in Economic Science, 2017; Member, National Academy of Science, American Academy of Arts and Sciences; Fellow, American Finance Association; Fellow, Econometrica Society; Vice President, American Economics Association; President, American Economics Association; TIAA‐CREF Paul Samuelson Award; Keil Global Economy Prize; CFA Institute Nicholas Molodovsky Prize PhD Honoris Causa, Case Western University, University of Rochester, Erasmus University PRIOR EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Jan 1998 ‐ Jun 1998 Fellow Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences Stanford, California Jan 1988 ‐ Jun 1995 Henrietta Johnson Louis Professor of Economics Johnson Graduate School of Management Cornell University and Director, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research Sep 1994 ‐ Jun 1995 Visiting Professor Sloan School of Management, MIT Jan 1993 ‐ Jul 1993 Visiting Professor Sloan School
    [Show full text]