Russia & Cis' Largest Virtual Capital Markets Event
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Russian M&A Review 2017
Russian M&A review 2017 March 2018 KPMG in Russia and the CIS kpmg.ru 2 Russian M&A review 2017 Contents page 3 page 6 page 10 page 13 page 28 page 29 KEY M&A 2017 OUTLOOK DRIVERS OVERVIEW IN REVIEW FOR 2018 IN 2017 METHODOLOGY APPENDICES — Oil and gas — Macro trends and medium-term — Financing – forecasts sanctions-related implications — Appetite and capacity for M&A — Debt sales market — Cross-border M&A highlights — Sector highlights © 2018 KPMG. All rights reserved. Russian M&A review 2017 3 Overview Although deal activity increased by 13% in 2017, the value of Russian M&A Deal was 12% lower than the previous activity 13% year, at USD66.9 billion, mainly due to an absence of larger deals. This was in particular reflected in the oil and gas sector, which in 2016 was characterised by three large deals with a combined value exceeding USD28 billion. The good news is that investors have adjusted to the realities of sanctions and lower oil prices, and sought opportunities brought by both the economic recovery and governmental efforts to create a new industrial strategy. 2017 saw a significant rise in the number and value of deals outside the Deal more traditional extractive industries value 37% and utility sectors, which have historically driven Russian M&A. Oil and gas sector is excluded If the oil and gas sector is excluded, then the value of deals rose by 37%, from USD35.5 billion in 2016 to USD48.5 billion in 2017. USD48.5bln USD35.5bln 2016 2017 © 2018 KPMG. -
A N N U a L R E P O
ANNUAL2011 REPORT PIK Group Annual Report 2011 New Level of Development PIK Group at a glance Annual Report 2011 PIK Group 3 PIK Group at a glance RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT We are a leading residential real estate developer in Russia, with OUR CORE ACTIVITIES ARE: BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS a particular strategic focus on the Moscow Metropolitan Area. The development of residential Each of the Directors confirms that, to the best of his or real estate properties and sales A LEADING MASS MARKET RESIDENTIAL her knowledge: Our principal activity is the development, construction and sale of completed units. DEVELOPER IN RUSSIA WITH 17 YEAR (a) the financial statements, prepared in accordance of mass-market residential properties in the Russian real estate market. TRACK RECORD 1 with International Financial Reporting Standards and The construction of reinforced concrete panel housing, the requirements of Cypriot Companies Law, Cap. FINANCIAL FIGURES 113, in each case included in this Annual Report, give production and assembly of a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial prefabricated panel residential position and profit and losses of the Company and buildings, including construction Around 10.5% market share1 in Moscow Metropolitan Area the undertakings included in the consolidation taken at our development sites and (MMA)2 in 2011 as a whole; and 46.0 bn RUR 9.4 bn RUR 11.7 bn RUR construction services provided Over 12 mln sqm of net selling area (NSA) completed since (b) the Management Report included in this Annual Revenue -
An Overview of Russian Ipos
www.pwc.ru/capital-markets An overview of Russian IPOs: 2005 to 2014 Listing centres, investment banks, legal counsels, auditors and issuers’ jurisdictions IPOs by listing centre (2005 – September 2014) IPOs on LSE by markets Number of IPOs Total (2005 – September 2014*) Listing centre Sept 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 No. % 2014 Main Market (Premium) London Stock Exchange (LSE) 11 19 15 3 2 3 7 5 1 1 67 57 2 Moscow Exchange 3 7 14 3 1 7 - - 2 - 37 32 Alternative NASDAQ (US) - 1 - - - - 1 1 1 - 4 3 Investment 17 Deutsche Börse - 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 3 2 Market (AIM) NASDAQ OMX (Europe) - - 2 - - - - - - - 2 2 Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) - - - - - 2 - - - - 2 2 NYSE - - - - - - - 1 1 - 2 2 Number of IPOs* 14 28 32 6 3 12 9 7 5 1 117 100 * The overview contains a selection of Russian IPOs and may not be a full list of deals for the period. Issuers with IPOs on LSE subsequently moved to premium listing 48 Main Market (GDRs**) Issuer Original market / year Premium listing year Polyus Gold Main Market (GDRs) / 2006 2012 *Of the total 67 IPOs on LSE Polymetal International Main Market (GDRs) / 2007 2011 **Global Depositary Receipts EVRAZ Main Market (GDRs) / 2005 2011 AFI Development Main Market (GDRs) / 2007 2010 Raven Russia AIM / 2005 2010 IPOs by industry and listing centre (2005 – September 2014) 15 14 14 LSE Moscow Exchange NASDAQ (US) NASDAQ OMX (Europe) Deutsche Borse HKEX NYSE 2 1 2 1 11 4 10 10 4 2 2 1 8 1 3 6 6 12 2 7 1 5 Number of IPOs 9 4 4 4 8 8 5 1 3 3 1 5 5 5 5 1 1 4 2 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 Metals & Mining Financial -
An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest Public Companies
An Overview Of Boards Of Directors At Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies,” while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the impetuous development of digital technologies continues The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times Twenty-four percent of the companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture. -
Deal Drivers Russia
February 2010 Deal Drivers Russia A survey and review of Russian corporate finance activity Contents Introduction 1 01 M&A Review 2 Overall deal trends 3 Domestic M&A trends 6 Cross-border M&A trends 8 Private equity 11 Acquisition finance 13 Valuations 14 02 Industries 15 Automotive 16 Energy 18 Financial Services 20 Consumer & Retail 22 Industrial Markets 24 Life Sciences 26 Mining 28 Technology, Media & Telecommunications 30 03 Survey Analysis 32 Introduction Prediction may be fast going out of fashion. At the end of 2008, CMS commissioned mergermarket to interview 100 Russian M&A and corporate decision makers to find out what they thought about the situation at the time and what their views on the future were. Falling commodity prices were viewed as the biggest threat, the Financial Services sector was expected to deliver the greatest growth for M&A activity and the bulk of inward investment was expected from Asia. The research revealed that two thirds of the respondents expected the overall level of M&A activity to increase over the course of 2009, with only one third predicting a fall. That third of respondents was right and, in general, the majority got it wrong or very wrong. The survey did get some things right – the predominance of Who knows? What’s the point? We consider the point to be the domestic players, the increase of non-money deals, the in the detail. Our survey looks at the market in 2009 sector number of transactions against a restructuring background, by sector – what was ‘in’ and what was ‘out’. -
Годовой Отчет Annual Report
годовой отчет 2 0 0 6 annual report STATEMENT OF THE offices. The Bank continues with regional CHIEF EXECUTIVE expansion, and has already in place 13 branch% es in Russian cities in 2006 compared to 7 branches by the year end 2005. MBRD's Dear shareholders, customers and partners regional network comprises 54 offices regis% of the Bank: tered with the Bank of Russia and located in 22 Today, the banking sector dramatically shows most industrialised federal constituencies of it can be a development engine not only for home the Russian Federation. In so doing, the Bank financial system, but also for the Russian econo% intends to step up efforts in further building up my at large. By meeting demands of domestic the banking chain in the future. companies, deposit%taking institutions are MBRD, no doubt, notably strengthened its becoming, in essence, national circulatory sys% positions in the Russian financial market over the tem giving access to financing. To comply with reporting year. To illustrate, net assets increased such an important role, Russian banks should by nearly RUR23.28 billion, while capital rose have adequate capital, technologies, diversified more than by RUR1.7 billion. Total income was network and quality products. RUR5.154 billion against 2.9 billion in 2005, and Presently, Moscow Bank for Reconstruction net profit increased by 65% to RUR442 million. and Development strategically focuses on retail In March 2006, a US$60m 10%year subordi% business development. It means expanding the nated eurobond issue placed on the Luxembourg existent spectrum of services, implementing Stock Exchange was an important event. -
Who Governs the Russian Economy? a Cross-Section of Russia's Largest Corporations
Kari Liuhto & Peeter Vahtra Who governs the Russian economy? A cross-section of Russia's largest corporations Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute 12/2009 ISSN 1795 - 5076 Who governs the Russian economy? A cross-section of Russia's largest corporations 1 Kari Liuhto2 and Peeter Vahtra3 12/2009 Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute http://www.tse.fi/pei 1 We wish to thank the following Finnish research foundations which have made it possible to conduct this report and numerous earlier studies linked with the theme; Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Foundation for Economic Education, Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, The Marcus Wallenberg Economic Foundation and The Paulo Foundation. 2 Kari Liuhto is Professor in International Business and Director of the Pan-European Institute at the Turku School of Economics. His research interests include EU-Russia economic relations, energy relations in particular, foreign investments into Russia and the investments of Russian firms abroad, and economic policy measures of strategic significance. Liuhto has worked as an expert in several Russia-related projects funded by both Finnish institutions and foreign ones, such as the European Commission, the European Parliament, the United Nations, and the World Bank. 3 Peeter Vahtra is a Research Fellow at the Pan-European Institute at the Turku School of Economics. His areas of research expertise include Russia’s energy policy, FDI to and from Russia and Russia’s economic policy. Kari Liuhto and Peeter Vahtra PEI Electronic Publications 12/2009 www.tse.fi/pei __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents 1. The state has increased its ownership in big business, but left small and medium-sized companies untouched 2 2. -
RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T
RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T. Allison, Director Editor: Ben Dunlap Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project Production Director: Melissa C..Carr John F. Kennedy School of Government Researcher: Emily Van Buskirk Harvard University Production Assistant: Emily Goodhue SPOTLIGHT ON RUSSIA’S OLIGARCHS On July 28 Russian President Vladimir Putin met with 21 of Russia’s most influ- ential businessmen to “redefine the relationship between the state and big busi- ness.” At that meeting, Putin assured the tycoons that privatization results would remained unchallenged, but stopped far short of offering a general amnesty for crimes committed in that process. He opened the meeting by saying: “I only want to draw your attention straightaway to the fact that you have yourselves formed this very state, to a large extent through political and quasi-political structures under your control.” Putin assured the oligarchs that recent investi- The Kremlin roundtable comes at a crucial time for the oligarchs. In the last gations were not part of a policy of attacking big business, but said he would not try to restrict two months, many of them have found themselves subjects of investigations prosecutors who launch such cases. by the General Prosecutor’s Office, Tax Police, and Federal Security Serv- ice. After years of cozying up to the government, buying up the state’s most valuable resources in noncompetitive bidding, receiving state-guaranteed loans with little accountability, and flouting the country’s tax laws with imp u- nity, the heads of some of Russia’s leading financial-industrial groups have been thrust under the spotlight. -
US Sanctions on Russia
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L. -
Russian Media Policy in the First and Second Checen Campaigns
Laura Belin (doctoral candidate, University of Oxford) e-mail: [email protected] Paper given at the 52nd conference of the Political Studies Association Aberdeen, Scotland, 5-8 April 2002 RUSSIAN MEDIA POLICY IN THE FIRST AND SECOND CHECHEN CAMPAIGNS The military campaign in Chechnya from December 1994 to August 1996 became the "first real test of journalists' freedoms" since the end of the Soviet Union1 and loomed large in perceptions about the Russian media for the rest of the 1990s. Though some journalists had condemned "shock therapy" in 1992 and the shelling of the parliament in 1993, the Chechen war prompted the journalistic community to desert Boris Yel'tsin en masse for the first time. Moscow-based television networks were the public's main source of information on the fighting.2 The private network NTV exposed official lies about how the war was waged. Newscasts on state-owned Russian Television (RTR), which reached a nationwide audience on Channel 2, soon followed NTV's lead. Virtually all privately owned newspapers also raised their voices against the military campaign. The predominant slant of war coverage became a source of pride for many journalists. Though damning news reports did not end the bloodshed, steadfast public opposition to the war impelled Yel'tsin to pursue a ceasefire agreement while running for reelection in 1996.3 Both supporters and opponents of the military campaign believed that media coverage fostered and sustained the majority view. Yel'tsin rarely retreated from unpopular policies, but his turnaround on Chechnya arguably demonstrated that journalists had helped bring some degree of transparency and therefore accountability to 1 Frank Ellis, From Glasnost to the Internet: Russia's New Infosphere, London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1999, p. -
25 YEARS of GROWTH in HARMONY with OUR CUSTOMERS Highlights 1
ANNUAL REPORT 2016 25 YEARS OF GROWTH IN HARMONY WITH OUR CUSTOMERS Highlights 1. Strategic Report 5. For Shareholders and Investors Key Financial Performance Indicators 2. Overview of Operations 6. Sustainable Development Mission and Values 3. Financial Results Contacts 2 / 197 4. Corporate Governance System Appendices www.mkb.ru Annual Report 2016 / Table of Contents Table of Contents Highlights Key Financial Performance Indicators Mission and Values 1. Strategic Report 2. Overview of operations 5. For shareholders and investors Appendices 1.1. Address of the Chairman of the 2.1. Corporate banking 6. Sustainable development Appendix 1. Supervisory Board IFRS Statements 2.2. Retail banking 6.1. Human Resources 1.2. Address of the Chairman of the Appendix 2. Management Board 2.3. Cash handling 6.2. Corporate Culture RAS Statements and Social Responsibility 1.3. Management Responsibility 3. Financial results Appendix 3. Statement 6.3. Information technologies List of interested party transactions 3.1. Income statement analysis made in the reporting year (2016) 1.4. Economy and banking sector 6.4. Society 3.2. Key Results List of major transactions made in 1.5. Business model. 6.5. Environmental Management the reporting year (2016) Competitive advantages. 3.3. Income statement analysis Position in the industry. Contacts List of transactions requiring 3.4. Structure of assets and liabilities approval under the Charter made in 1.6. Strategy under IFRS the reporting year (2016) 1.7. Risk Management 4. Corporate governance system Appendix 4. Report on Compliance with the Principles and Recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code. Highlights 1. Strategic Report 5. -
Dmitri V. Kovalenko
Dmitri V. Kovalenko Partner, Moscow Mergers and Acquisitions; Private Equity; Capital Markets Dmitri Kovalenko is co-head of the Moscow office and represents international and Russian clients on a broad range of mergers and acquisitions, private equity and joint venture transac- tions in Russia and other countries covering various industries and sectors. Mr. Kovalenko has practiced law in Skadden’s Moscow, Chicago and Paris offices since 1994. He is ranked in the top tier for Russia M&A and Russia capital markets work by Chambers Global and Chambers Europe, as well as for private equity in Russia by Chambers Europe. Mr. Kovalenko also was named as the 2021 Mergers and Acquisitions Lawyer of the Year and the 2020 Capital Markets Lawyer of the Year by The Best Lawyers in Russia, and was listed in the publication’s Global Business Edition. Additionally, he is listed as a leading individual in IFLR1000 and Who’s Who Legal, as well as repeatedly in The Legal 500 EMEA as a member of its Commercial, Corporate and M&A: Moscow Hall of Fame. T: 7.495.797.4600 F: 7.495.797.4601 His M&A and private equity experience has included advising: [email protected] - Mercury Retail Group in its US$1.2 billion sale of JSC Dixy Group to PJSC Magnit; - Horvik Limited in relation to its preconditional mandatory offer to acquire Trans-Siberian Gold Education plc, an AIM-quoted gold producer; LL.M. (with honors), Northwestern - Kismet Acquisition One, a special purpose acquisition company, in its US$1.9 billion initial University School of Law, Chicago, merger with Nexters Global Limited, the first-ever de-SPAC transaction involving a Russian USA, 1996 company.