DOCSLIB.ORG

A N N U a L R E P O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A N N U a L R E P O ANNUAL2011 REPORT PIK Group Annual Report 2011 New Level of Development PIK Group at a glance Annual Report 2011 PIK Group 3 PIK Group at a glance RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT We are a leading residential real estate developer in Russia, with OUR CORE ACTIVITIES ARE: BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS a particular strategic focus on the Moscow Metropolitan Area. The development of residential Each of the Directors confirms that, to the best of his or real estate properties and sales A LEADING MASS MARKET RESIDENTIAL her knowledge: Our principal activity is the development, construction and sale of completed units. DEVELOPER IN RUSSIA WITH 17 YEAR (a) the financial statements, prepared in accordance of mass-market residential properties in the Russian real estate market. TRACK RECORD 1 with International Financial Reporting Standards and The construction of reinforced concrete panel housing, the requirements of Cypriot Companies Law, Cap. FINANCIAL FIGURES 113, in each case included in this Annual Report, give production and assembly of a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial prefabricated panel residential position and profit and losses of the Company and buildings, including construction Around 10.5% market share1 in Moscow Metropolitan Area the undertakings included in the consolidation taken at our development sites and (MMA)2 in 2011 as a whole; and 46.0 bn RUR 9.4 bn RUR 11.7 bn RUR construction services provided Over 12 mln sqm of net selling area (NSA) completed since (b) the Management Report included in this Annual Revenue in 2011 Gross profit in 2011 EBITDA in 20111 to third parties. inception 88% of project portfolio by value is concentrated in MMA3 Report includes a fair review of the development (2010: 38.1 bn RUR; Л20.7%) (2010: 2.9 bn RUR; Л224.1%) (2010: –2.1 bn RUR; Л557.1%) The production of reinforced and performance of the business and the position concrete panels, window of the Company and the undertakings included in 41.2 46.0 9.4 11.7 38.1 8.7 8.6 frames and other construction the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a INTEGRATED BUSINESS MODEL WITH 33.7 materials. description of the principal risks and uncertainties 2008 2009 2010 SUBSTANTIAL PRODUCTION FACILITIES that they face.” 2011 The servicing and maintenance AND CONSIDERABLE PORTFOLIO OF PROJECTS (3.5) (2.1) 2 This Annual Report has been prepared for the 2.9 of real estate properties shareholders of the Company as a body and no other constructed by us and other persons. The Company, its directors, employees, developers and other activities, agents or advisers do not accept responsibility to any 2008 2009 2010 2011 2008 2009 2010 2011 (28.2) not included in the real estate other person to whom this document is shown or into Source: IFRS accounts Source: IFRS accounts Source: IFRS accounts development, construction and whose hands it may come and any such responsibility industrial segments. #1 in Russia by prefabricated panel facilities or liability is expressly disclaimed. By their nature, the Large/diversified portfolio of projects with 6.9 mln sqm of KEY INDICATORS 3 statements concerning the risks and uncertainties facing unsold NSA valued by CBRE at US$2.7 bln the Company in this Annual Report involve uncertainty Construction services and in-house sales force since future events and circumstances can cause WE BELIEVE results and developments to differ materially from those anticipated. The forward-looking statements contained th sqm th sqm bn RUR WE BELIEVE THAT OUR IMPROVING in this Annual Report reflect knowledge and information 512 510 52.0 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2 3 available at the date of preparation of this Annual Report Transfers to customers in 2011 New sales to customers in 2011 Total cash collections in 2011 INTEGRATED REAL (2010: 434 th sqm; Л18.0%) (2010: 392 th sqm; Л30.1%) (2010: n/a; Л30.3%) 3 and the Company undertakes no obligation to update ESTATE DEVELOPMENT these forwardlooking statements. Further, nothing in this 492 512 520 510 61.8 Annual Report should be construed as a profit forecast. 434 52.0 PROCESS GIVES 378 392 39.9 US AN IMPORTANT Strong sales growth of apartments (510 th sqm in 2011 32.8 ADVANTAGE IN vs. 392 th sqm in 2010) Increased cash collections from pre-sales (RUB52.0 bln 123 OUR INDUSTRY AS in 2011 vs. RUB39.9 bln in 2010) COMPARED TO OUR Recovering profitability (20.4% gross profit margin in 2011) Net income back into the black (RUB4.8 bln in 2011 vs. net loss 2008 2009 2010 2011 2008 2009 2010 2011 2008 2009 2010 2011 COMPETITORS of RUB6.0 bln) Source: IFRS accounts Source: Management accounts Source: Management accounts The Board of Directors (1) Calculated as PIK’s share in total residential housing completed (in sqm) in MMA in 2011 excluding PIK Group PLC (1) EBITDA represents total comprehensive income/(loss) before income tax expense, interest income, interest expense including penalties payable and depreciation and amortization individual housing (2) PIK own development projects, PIK share. IFRS accounts (2) Moscow Metropolitan Area (MMA) includes Moscow and the Moscow region April 28, 2011 (3) PIK own development projects, PIK share. Management accounts (3) As of December 31, 2011 2 PIK Group Annual Report 2011 Chairman statement Annual Report 2011 PIK Group 3 IN EARLY 2011, PIK SHARES WERE INCLUDED IN QUOTATION LIST A1 ON MICEX-RTS STOCK EXCHANGE, PLACING PIK AMONG A GROUP OF Chairman’s statement BLUE CHIP RUSSIAN COMPANIES Dear Shareholders, On behalf on the Board of Directors, it is a pleasure to present PIK Group’s Annual Report for 2011. Following a difficult two-year period On corporate governance, significant This shift took place in early September 2011 between 2009-2010 in which the progress has been made in opening and served to recognize PIK Group among Group worked hard to restructure its the Board of Directors to more Russian blue-chip companies. We hope that debts and restart operations, in 2011 Independent Directors and ensuring this step will allow us to increase the liquidity the Group made strong progress the interests of all shareholders are of PIK stock and broaden the range of our with the turnaround of its business. well represented. We also worked potential investors. The year proved productive on many on adopting best practice standards. fronts. Operationally, PIK accelerated In August 2011, PIK instituted a Looking to the future, the Group is well the launch of new projects from code of ethics, which prescribed positioned as a leading residential developer its pipeline, starting up on 41 new basic ethical standards and rules of in one of the fastest growing cities in Europe. sites. This in turn helped drive a conduct, by which Group employees We continue to innovate and the quality of significant pick-up in apartment are expected to abide in the course our product is improving, as evidenced by the sales, which increased by over 30% of performing their duties. recent launch of the new “Flagman” building YoY. Financially, we managed to series. Following a large amount of hard work complete PIK’s debt restructuring We also focused on improving our balance sheet is on a sound footing, we programme by reaching agreement transparency in PIK’s have a good pipeline of projects for 2012, with Nomos-Bank on the extension communications with investors. including outside Moscow and we are of the Group’s last overdue credit During the year we approved beginning again to generate good cash flow. facility for a further 3 year period. regulations concerning disclosure The Group is in a better position than it has The completion of this programme practices and set up the Disclosure been for some time to take advantage of its means that PIK can move forward Committee at Management Board well-known brand and deliver sustainable and on a sounder financial footing and level to ensure compliance with profitable growth. grow the business in the interest of the legal requirements of the all stakeholders. During the year we Russian Federation, the listing We would like to take the opportunity to saw further signs that the Russian requirements of the UK, as well as thank all our stakeholders for their support economy is strengthening and will the Management Board’s resolutions in the past year and look forward to showing be able to underpin sustainable and other internal regulations. further improvements in 2012. growth in consumer demand. Russia continues to outperform most of In addition, we made changes in the developed markets, with GDP other bylaws to be in compliance growth reaching 4.2% last year. with higher standards of the Russian Mortgage penetration also continued Micex-RTS stock exchange for to grow and new mortgages originated inclusion into quotation list A1. by the banks reached an all-time high of RUB766bn, a significant factor for PIK and its clients. Vladislav MAMULKIN Chairman 4 PIK Group Annual Report 2011 Our History Annual Report 2011 PIK Group 5 SINCE 2009 WE HAVE WORKED HARD TO GET OUR OPERATIONS INTO GEAR AGAIN, REGAIN Our History CONSUMER CONFIDENCE AND RESTORE PIK’S REPUTATION Founded in 1994, PIK Group is a leading residential property developer in Russia, where today our brand is well known to a whole generation of homebuyers. “YAROSLAVSKY” DEVELOPMENT, MYTISHI, MOSCOW REGION PREFABRICATED PRODUCTION FACILITY, DSK-3 “THE STAR OF RUSSIA” DEVELOPMENT, KHIMKI, MOSCOW REGION “NOVOKURKINO” DEVELOPMENT, KHIMKI, MOSCOW REGION 1998 2001 2004-2007 2007-2009 2009 2009 2009-2011 For many of our customers, As its name With development and Success in Moscow allowed After many year of growth, To reduce the impact of the In April 2009 The residential housing a PIK apartment has been suggests, PIK, an mortgage finance activities the Group to expand into culminating in the successful economic downturn on our Nafta Moskva market started to recover their first experience of abbreviation of in place, we began our other Russian cities and in 2007 IPO of PIK Group on operations and overcome (the “Nafta in 2009, when demand property ownership and a (“First Mortgage Company”), diversification into large 2004 we began the process the London Stock Exchange, related liquidity constraints, Moskva Group”) became from consumers returned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian M&A Review 2017
    Russian M&A review 2017 March 2018 KPMG in Russia and the CIS kpmg.ru 2 Russian M&A review 2017 Contents page 3 page 6 page 10 page 13 page 28 page 29 KEY M&A 2017 OUTLOOK DRIVERS OVERVIEW IN REVIEW FOR 2018 IN 2017 METHODOLOGY APPENDICES — Oil and gas — Macro trends and medium-term — Financing – forecasts sanctions-related implications — Appetite and capacity for M&A — Debt sales market — Cross-border M&A highlights — Sector highlights © 2018 KPMG. All rights reserved. Russian M&A review 2017 3 Overview Although deal activity increased by 13% in 2017, the value of Russian M&A Deal was 12% lower than the previous activity 13% year, at USD66.9 billion, mainly due to an absence of larger deals. This was in particular reflected in the oil and gas sector, which in 2016 was characterised by three large deals with a combined value exceeding USD28 billion. The good news is that investors have adjusted to the realities of sanctions and lower oil prices, and sought opportunities brought by both the economic recovery and governmental efforts to create a new industrial strategy. 2017 saw a significant rise in the number and value of deals outside the Deal more traditional extractive industries value 37% and utility sectors, which have historically driven Russian M&A. Oil and gas sector is excluded If the oil and gas sector is excluded, then the value of deals rose by 37%, from USD35.5 billion in 2016 to USD48.5 billion in 2017. USD48.5bln USD35.5bln 2016 2017 © 2018 KPMG.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Russian Ipos
    www.pwc.ru/capital-markets An overview of Russian IPOs: 2005 to 2014 Listing centres, investment banks, legal counsels, auditors and issuers’ jurisdictions IPOs by listing centre (2005 – September 2014) IPOs on LSE by markets Number of IPOs Total (2005 – September 2014*) Listing centre Sept 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 No. % 2014 Main Market (Premium) London Stock Exchange (LSE) 11 19 15 3 2 3 7 5 1 1 67 57 2 Moscow Exchange 3 7 14 3 1 7 - - 2 - 37 32 Alternative NASDAQ (US) - 1 - - - - 1 1 1 - 4 3 Investment 17 Deutsche Börse - 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 3 2 Market (AIM) NASDAQ OMX (Europe) - - 2 - - - - - - - 2 2 Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) - - - - - 2 - - - - 2 2 NYSE - - - - - - - 1 1 - 2 2 Number of IPOs* 14 28 32 6 3 12 9 7 5 1 117 100 * The overview contains a selection of Russian IPOs and may not be a full list of deals for the period. Issuers with IPOs on LSE subsequently moved to premium listing 48 Main Market (GDRs**) Issuer Original market / year Premium listing year Polyus Gold Main Market (GDRs) / 2006 2012 *Of the total 67 IPOs on LSE Polymetal International Main Market (GDRs) / 2007 2011 **Global Depositary Receipts EVRAZ Main Market (GDRs) / 2005 2011 AFI Development Main Market (GDRs) / 2007 2010 Raven Russia AIM / 2005 2010 IPOs by industry and listing centre (2005 – September 2014) 15 14 14 LSE Moscow Exchange NASDAQ (US) NASDAQ OMX (Europe) Deutsche Borse HKEX NYSE 2 1 2 1 11 4 10 10 4 2 2 1 8 1 3 6 6 12 2 7 1 5 Number of IPOs 9 4 4 4 8 8 5 1 3 3 1 5 5 5 5 1 1 4 2 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 Metals & Mining Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Russia & Cis' Largest Virtual Capital Markets Event
    REGISTER YOUR PLACE TODAY AT WWW.BONDSLOANSRUSSIA.COM RUSSIA & CIS’ LARGEST VIRTUAL CAPITAL MARKETS EVENT 500+ 40+ 250+ 100+ 2,100+ SENIOR WORLD CLASS SOVEREIGN, CORPORATE INVESTORS CONTACTS AVAILABLE TO ATTENDEES SPEAKERS & FI BORROWERS NETWORK WITH ONLINE It’s great to have Bonds & Loans with us in all times - good and bad. Our team has particularly enjoyed the networking opportunities, the program is excellent too, and you’ve proved once again your reputation of the leading capital markets event in Russia. Dmitri Surkov, Global Head of Revenue Management, Fitch Ratings Gold Sponsor: Silver Sponsors: Bronze Sponsors: Corporate Sponsors: www.BondsLoansRussia.com BRINGING GLOBAL FINANCE LEADERS TOGETHER WITH THE RUSSIA & CIS CAPITAL MARKETS COMMUNITY Meet senior decision-makers from Russia & the CIS sovereigns, corporates and banks; share knowledge; debate; network; and move your business forward in the current economic climate without having to travel. 500+ 40+ 250+ SENIOR WORLD CLASS SOVEREIGN, CORPORATE 100+ ATTENDEES SPEAKERS & FI BORROWERS INVESTORS Access top market practitioners from Industry leading speakers will share Hear first-hand how local and international Leverage our concierge across the globe who are active in “on-the-ground” market intelligence industry leaders are navigating Russia & the meeting service the Russia & CIS markets, including: and updates on Russia & the CIS’s CIS’s current economic climate/what they to engage with global senior borrowers, investors, bankers & economic backdrop. Gain actionable expect in
    [Show full text]
  • Годовой Отчет Annual Report
    годовой отчет 2 0 0 6 annual report STATEMENT OF THE offices. The Bank continues with regional CHIEF EXECUTIVE expansion, and has already in place 13 branch% es in Russian cities in 2006 compared to 7 branches by the year end 2005. MBRD's Dear shareholders, customers and partners regional network comprises 54 offices regis% of the Bank: tered with the Bank of Russia and located in 22 Today, the banking sector dramatically shows most industrialised federal constituencies of it can be a development engine not only for home the Russian Federation. In so doing, the Bank financial system, but also for the Russian econo% intends to step up efforts in further building up my at large. By meeting demands of domestic the banking chain in the future. companies, deposit%taking institutions are MBRD, no doubt, notably strengthened its becoming, in essence, national circulatory sys% positions in the Russian financial market over the tem giving access to financing. To comply with reporting year. To illustrate, net assets increased such an important role, Russian banks should by nearly RUR23.28 billion, while capital rose have adequate capital, technologies, diversified more than by RUR1.7 billion. Total income was network and quality products. RUR5.154 billion against 2.9 billion in 2005, and Presently, Moscow Bank for Reconstruction net profit increased by 65% to RUR442 million. and Development strategically focuses on retail In March 2006, a US$60m 10%year subordi% business development. It means expanding the nated eurobond issue placed on the Luxembourg existent spectrum of services, implementing Stock Exchange was an important event.
    [Show full text]
  • US Sanctions on Russia
    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dmitri V. Kovalenko
    Dmitri V. Kovalenko Partner, Moscow Mergers and Acquisitions; Private Equity; Capital Markets Dmitri Kovalenko is co-head of the Moscow office and represents international and Russian clients on a broad range of mergers and acquisitions, private equity and joint venture transac- tions in Russia and other countries covering various industries and sectors. Mr. Kovalenko has practiced law in Skadden’s Moscow, Chicago and Paris offices since 1994. He is ranked in the top tier for Russia M&A and Russia capital markets work by Chambers Global and Chambers Europe, as well as for private equity in Russia by Chambers Europe. Mr. Kovalenko also was named as the 2021 Mergers and Acquisitions Lawyer of the Year and the 2020 Capital Markets Lawyer of the Year by The Best Lawyers in Russia, and was listed in the publication’s Global Business Edition. Additionally, he is listed as a leading individual in IFLR1000 and Who’s Who Legal, as well as repeatedly in The Legal 500 EMEA as a member of its Commercial, Corporate and M&A: Moscow Hall of Fame. T: 7.495.797.4600 F: 7.495.797.4601 His M&A and private equity experience has included advising: [email protected] - Mercury Retail Group in its US$1.2 billion sale of JSC Dixy Group to PJSC Magnit; - Horvik Limited in relation to its preconditional mandatory offer to acquire Trans-Siberian Gold Education plc, an AIM-quoted gold producer; LL.M. (with honors), Northwestern - Kismet Acquisition One, a special purpose acquisition company, in its US$1.9 billion initial University School of Law, Chicago, merger with Nexters Global Limited, the first-ever de-SPAC transaction involving a Russian USA, 1996 company.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Russia's Structural Leaders
    June 7, 2011 GS SUSTAIN Equity Research Identifying Russia’s structural leaders Identifying long-term winners with SUSTAIN Russia Structural Leaders List We have applied the GS SUSTAIN framework to We have identified eight companies that have RUSSIA STRUCTURAL LEADERS 75 companies across our Russian coverage to delivered and in our view will continue to deliver y identify those well positioned to deliver long-term industry leading cash returns: Mechel, EDCL, Company Sector quality quartile position quartile Management CROCI CROCI average 2011- % 13E, CROCI change 2006-10, % quartile CROCI outperformance through sustained high cash Alliance Oil, Rosneft and Novatek in the natural Novatek Energy 32.1% 0.3% 1 1 1 Oil Serv & Pipe Eurasia Drilling Co 28.2% -2.1% 2 1 1 returns. The framework combines forecast cash resources space and Magnit, Cherkizovo and M- producers Mechel Steel 21.9% -0.6% 2 1 1 returns with objective measures of industry Video in the consumer segment. Investing in this Alliance Oil CompaEnergy 17.4% 0.8% 2 1 1 Magnit (GDR) Consumer 17.1% -0.2% 2 1 1 positioning and management quality, which in a list of companies would have generated over Cherkizovo Group Consumer 16.1% 1.2% 2 1 2 M-VIDEO Consumer 15.0% 1.4% 2 1 2 Russian context focus predominantly on 300% outperformance vs. the MSCI Russia since Rosneft Energy 13.9% 1.0% 2 1 2 ownership and corporate governance issues. January 2006. RUSSIA STRUCTURAL LEADERS WATCH LIST Russia at the intersection of global structural Russia Structural Leaders Watch List Company Sector dust y CROCI average 2011-13E, % CROCI change 2006-10, % quartile CROCI position quartile Management quality quartile trends Disclosure remains sub par in many Russian Uralkali Mining 38.3% 2.4% 1 1 3 Globaltrans Transport 20.3% 2.3% 1 1 3 Oil Serv & Pipe Russia’s economy and equity market are corporates and is the main reason why a number ChelPipe 18.0% -1.3% 2 1 3 producers undergoing a dramatic transformation through of companies that are forecast to generate Mail.ru Group Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest
    An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: • “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail • The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board • Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee • Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies”, while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample • The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors • Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the development of digital technologies continues • The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit • Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent • The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times • Twenty-four percent of companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE PARTNERSHIP IN FIGHTING NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES Corporate healthy lifestyle efforts at enterprises have significant potential March 13, 2014, Moscow — The Association of International Pharmaceutical Manufacturers (AIPM) together with the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA) released the findings of an analytical research on corporate healthy lifestyle practices at Russian and global companies and provide recommendations on the development and implementation of such programs. The study was prepared with support of the National Research and Development Center for Preventive Medicine at the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP), in partnership with the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. The research entitled Recommendations on Development and Introduction of Corporate Healthy Lifestyle Programs for Employees contributes to a series of publications on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) initiated by AIPM and IFPMA1. This study reviews global and Russian practices in fighting the main risk factors of NCDs as well as recommendations for developing health programs both for corporate senior management and government. NCD preventive efforts worldwide focus on curbing the main risk factors – tobacco use, the harmful use of alcohol, unhealthy diets and physical inactivity. For each of these risk factors, successful strategies have been implemented in many countries: for instance, fiscal interventions have proved to be most efficient in fighting smoking and harmful use of alcohol; and mass media campaigns – in fighting physical inactivity and unhealthy diets. At the same time, to achieve full effect, comprehensive and coordinated measures are necessary. In this context, the potential of corporate programs to contribute to combating the main risk factors has been particularly underestimated.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the ROAD City Moscow
    a a a s r Hotel Hilton i a y t k li s D vo o u M t o e l li k va a t y u u uc ry k o 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa e Ragout a a h p r k e a i y e h s e ulitsa Fadeeva t p s ga a v a s 4-ya 11Tverskaya Yamskaya ulitsa ele p k p M D o y i s e 3 Sad r r a tsa ova k s e s uli p - naya Samotechnaya ulitsa ya NII Skoroy Pomoshchi a it ya tech Sadovaya -S s S u l 1-ya Brestskaya ulitsa ovaya Samo uk ’ kor Sad ha l p lo u 1 rev Sklifosovskogo e S Kazansky s t n k ulitsa Chayanova 1 ka y a ya p a az T u s T v lit y vokzal sa o h t e a i r K n l s lok h iy u k y s B ’ p a l - Kalanchevskaya ulitsa l a y reu eu e o e r 1 o r a p A. A. Chernikhov Design e Dokuchaev pereulok y 6 l iy e n B a Y y ’ u e s am h p and Architecture Studio l k z o u h r Sukharevskaya s O v k o s v k o y o a h y y K k a i h a u L c li r Ryazanskiy proezd ts a e n Novoryazanskaya ulitsa 1-ya 11Tverskaya Yamskaya ulitsa s t a t la li n u a a iy o y l a K n Tsventoy bul’var u l’ p Sadovaya-Spasskaya ulitsa fa e m e r iu ultisa Petrovka r e a r e T p 52 k r Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya ulitsa 53 ya u n a a ulitsa Malaya Dmitrovka k v l iy o o e o lok v n l d reu ’ n pe k t Mayakovskaya eu Sa Maliy Karetniy l a e m r u s r 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa pe b S iy V n y y o a o r s n he o t ulitsa Mashi poryvaevoy z i t t l ru ni pereulok 2-ya Brestskaya ulitsa etniy e O dniy Kar k u k Sad e v ereulo Orlikov pereulok o r arevskiy p Vasilyevskaya ulitsa S s kh Daev pereulok v T Bol’shoy Su 64 Ermitazh T o s Krasnovorotskiy proezd s v Mosproekt-2 k e i Tishinskaya ulitsa Yuliusa Fuchika y t p Pushkinskaya
    [Show full text]
  • Information (Materials) Provided to the Shareholders During the Preparation for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders OJSC “Uralkali”
    Information (materials) provided to the shareholders During the preparation for the Annual General Meeting Of Shareholders OJSC “Uralkali” Information on the candidates nominated for election to the Board of Directors, Revision Commission and Auditors of OJSC Uralkali Information on the candidates nominated for election to the Board of Directors Vladislav Baumgertner Member of the Board of Directors in 2004–2010. Vladislav Baumgertner was born in 1972. In 1994 he graduated from the State Technical University of the Urals and qualifi ed as an Electrical Engineer. In 2001 Mr. Baumgertner completed his studies at Kingston Business School and earned an MBA (Master of Business Administration). In 2003 Vladislav Baumgertner graduated from the University of London with an MSc degree in Financial Management. From 2005 until July 2010 he served as the General Director of OJCS Uralkali. In 2004–2010 he served on the Boards of Directors of several of the Uralkali's subsidiaries and was also a member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Silvinit and CJSC Belarusian Potash Company. Vladislav Bamgertner was a member of the Investments and Development Committee of the Board of Directors. The powers of V. Baumgertner as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company were terminated on 18 June 2010. From October 2010 until February 2011 Vladislav Baumgertner worked as the General Director of OJSC Silvnit. Mr. Baumgertner currently serves on the Boards of Directors of the following companies: OJSC Galurgia, CJSC VNII Galurgii and CJSC Solikamsky construction trust. He is a member of the Supervisory Board of CJSC Belarusian Potash Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Megapolis Public Transport System
    International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 9, Issue 10, October 2018, pp. 647–658, Article ID: IJCIET_09_10_068 Available online at http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJCIET?Volume=9&Issue=10 ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316 ©IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed MEGAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM Tatyana Sakulyeva PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of forwarding Services Management, The State University of Management, 109542, Rjazanskij Prospekt, 99, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT The development of public transport is one of the the issue of the day, as it directly or indirectly affects the efficiency of the country's economy and the implementation of socio -economic functions. The system of urban passenger transport plays an important role in big cities life especially in solving the spectrum of issues related to the problems of providing comfortable, safe, high-quality transport services to all citizens. The article examines the problems and prospects of development of public transport in a megapolis based on the Moscow experience. After the detailed research, there will be provided the recommendations directed to solve transport problems in Moscow. Successful growth and development are impossible without improving the infrastructure and communications of urban passenger transport. Key words: public transport, transportation infrastructure, metro, bus, tram and trolleybus routes, suburban electric trains. Cite this Article: Tatyana Sakulyeva, Megapolis Public Transport System, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) 9(10), 2018, pp. 647–658. http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJCIET?Volume=9&Issue=10 1. INTRODUCTION It is impossible to imagine big cities without public transport system. The main role of public transport is to ensure the permanent urban development (Mageean & Nelson, 2003; Cullinane, 2002; Paget-Seekins & Tironi, 2016).
    [Show full text]