DOCSLIB.ORG

Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action (MPGCA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action (MPGCA) Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action (MPGCA) Transport Initiatives: Stock-take on action toward implementation of the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development Second Progress Report November 2017 + Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................................. iii I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Background on this report ................................................................................................................ 2 B. Objectives of the Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action ............................................... 2 C. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Mapping of MPGCA Transport Initiatives ............................................................................................. 5 A. Types of signatories and partners ..................................................................................................... 6 B. Alignment with the “Avoid-Shift-Improve" framework .................................................................... 8 C. Types of activities ............................................................................................................................ 10 III. How do the MPGCA Transport Initiatives measure progress? ....................................................... 11 A. Assessment of internal outputs of the MPGCA Transport Initiatives ............................................. 11 B. Assessment of External Outcomes of the MPGCA Transport Initiatives ........................................ 18 C. Assessment of External Impacts of the MPGCA Transport Initiatives ............................................ 22 D. Monitoring of Progress ................................................................................................................... 25 IV. Policy barriers and importance of state support ............................................................................ 27 A. Policy Barriers ................................................................................................................................. 27 B. Importance of State Support .......................................................................................................... 29 C. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 31 V. MPGCA Transport Initiatives and the Link to SDG Related Transport Targets ................................... 32 A. MPGCA Transport Initiatives and SDG targets ................................................................................ 32 VI. MPGCA Transport Initiatives and their Link to Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) ....... 34 A. MPGCA Transport Initiatives and NDCs .......................................................................................... 34 VII. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................... 37 A. Progress since COP22: expanding activities and impacts ............................................................... 37 B. Clear acceleration signals for non-state actor action since COP22 ................................................ 38 C. Achievements made towards building resilience to climate change ............................................. 39 Annex I: Profiles of MPGCA Transport Initiatives ....................................................................................... 41 ii List of Tables and Figures Table 1. Overview of MPGCA Transport Initiatives Signatories and Partners by type of institution ........... 6 Table 2. MPGCA Transport Initiatives Organized by Avoid-Shift-Improve Approach ................................... 8 Table 3. MPGCA Transport Initiatives Organized by Types of objectives ................................................... 10 Table 4. Overview of internal outputs of MPGCA Transport Initiatives ..................................................... 12 Table 5. Overview of external outcomes of MPGCA Transport Initiatives ................................................. 18 Table 6. Overview of external impacts of MPGCA Transport Initiatives..................................................... 22 Table 7. Overview of measures for monitoring and reporting ................................................................... 25 Table 8. Examples of state support for MPGCA Transport Initiatives ........................................................ 30 Table 9. Linkages between the MPGCA Transport Initiatives and the SDGs .............................................. 32 Table 10. Summary of progress of MPGCA transport initiatives ................................................................ 37 Table 11. Estimated GHG reduction potential and cost per ton of transport measures ............................ 53 Figure 1. Percentage of NDCs with linkages to MPGCA Transport Initiatives ............................................ 35 Figure 2. Number of NDCs that contain proposed measures linked to the MPGCA Transport initiatives (Direct and Indirect) ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 3. ACA Accredited airports over time (2010-2017) .......................................................................... 41 Figure 4. Distribution of ACA accredited airports ....................................................................................... 42 iii List of Abbreviations 2DS Two-Degree Scenario ACERT Airport Carbon and Emissions Reporting Tool A-S-I Avoid-Shift-Improve ATAG Air Transport Action Group CCAC Climate and Clean Air Coalition CO2 Carbon Dioxide COP Conference of the Parties CORSIA Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation ECF European Cyclist’ Federation ESRS Environment Strategy Reporting System EU European Union EV Electric Vehicles GFEI Global Fuel Economy Initiative GGFAP Global Green Freight Action Plan GHG Greenhouse Gas GLEC Global Logistics Emissions Council HDDI Heavy Duty Diesel Initiative ICAO International Civil Aviation Association ICCT International Council on Clean Transportation ITS Intelligent Transport System LC2RTI Low Carbon Road and Road Transport Initiative MPGCA Global Climate Action Agenda MPGCA Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action NDC Nationally Determined Contribution NUA New Urban Agenda REDII European Renewable Energy Directive SDG Sustainable Development Goals SE4ALL Sustainable Energy for All SLoCaT Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon Transport TUMI Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative UEMI Urban Electric Mobility Initiative UIC International Union of Railways UITP International Association of Public Transport UN United Nations UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change WCA World Cycling Alliance ZEV Zero-Emission Vehicles 1 I. Introduction A. Background on this report This report gives an overview of 21 voluntary multi-stakeholder initiatives on sustainable, low carbon transport, the manner in which they measure progress and their alignment with the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development. This is the Second Progress Report updated based on the first progress report released at the Marrakech Climate Conference of the Parties (COP22) in November 2016. The Second Progress Report covers the progress of the initiatives up until 31st October 2017. B. Objectives of the Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action Inspired by the call to action by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in September 2014 and followed up by the Lima Paris Action Agenda (LPAA), 15 transport initiatives were developed by non-state actors in the transport sector that were showcased during COP21 at the Transport Focus event on December 3rd, 20151. COP21 also decided to appoint High Level Champions (HLC) to “facilitate through strengthened high- level engagement in the period 2016–2020 the successful execution of existing efforts and the scaling-up and introduction of new or strengthened voluntary efforts, initiatives and coalitions”. Following the appointment of the first two High Level Champions and the COP 22 in Marrakech, the action agenda was renamed as Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action (MPGCA) in November 2016. These commitments were developed to trigger more ambitious action in all major parts of the transport sector. The selection of the initiatives followed a scientific and systematic approach and combines a top- down with a bottom-up approach. The systematic top-down approach was based on IPCC and UNEP reports which defined the key sub sectors where action needs to be taken to remain on a 2° pathway. The bottom-up process, through which organizations were invited to propose initiatives helped us to understand the initiatives that stakeholders are proposing. The underlying idea of the MPGCA was to make sure all key sectors were covered with impactful initiatives, which could be joined by states as well as non-states actors, so that the global ambition of countries to act on climate change can be scaled up. The MPGCA is planned to be a living process: some initiatives might
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nonstate Actors in the Climate Arena
    Sponsored by The Stanley Foundation, National Defense University, and World Future Society November 19, 2014 Being There: The Nonstate Role in Multilateral Cooperation Conference Washington, DC Nonstate Actors in the Climate Arena by Josh Busby, University of Texas-Austin and Jennifer Hadden, University of Maryland-College Park This Working Paper was prepared for Being There: The Nonstate Role in Multilateral Cooperation. Participants neither reviewed nor approved this paper; the views expressed are the personal views of the author and not necessarily those of the Stanley Foundation, the National Defense University, or the World Future Society. This paper is in draft form and has not been edited for publication. The author's affiliation is listed for identification purposes only. Nonstate Actors in the Climate Arena Josh Busby, University of Texas-Austin, [email protected] Jennifer Hadden, University of Maryland-College Park, [email protected] Greenhouse gas concentrations peaked above 400 parts per million in 2013, the highest level in 800,000 years (Freedman 2013). With some climate change now inevitable, concern has shifted to containing the expected increase and minimizing the consequences. Political leaders have previously committed to restraining global temperatures to no more than a 2 degrees Celsius increase above pre-industrial levels, a level beyond which scientists fear “dangerous” consequences. Since the main greenhouse gas -- carbon dioxide -- persists in the atmosphere for about one hundred years, analysts note with urgency that the world has only a few decades to move towards dramatic decarbonization of the global economy in order to avoid overshooting the 2 degrees target. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has been the main instrument for international negotiations on climate since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions Gap Report 2018 © 2018 United Nations Environment Programme November 2018
    Emissions Gap Report 2018 © 2018 United Nations Environment Programme November 2018 ISBN: 978-92-807-3726-4 Job number: DEW/2210/NA This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UN Environment would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UN Environment. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Communication Division, UN Environment, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. For general guidance on matters relating to the use of maps in publications please go to http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm Disclaimers Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by UN Environment or the authors. The use of information from this document for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion with no intention on infringement of trademark or copyright laws.
    [Show full text]
  • 304 EN Full Document NOV-15 EN.Indd
    CLIMATE CHANGE Mitigation: Solving the Rubik’s cube Why institutional investors matter Getting policies in line Supporting investment and disclosure No 304 November 2015 www.oecdobserver.org Nuclear vision Decarbonising transport No jobs on a dead planet Economics for the Anthropocene Spotlight: Ville Lumière–Paris lights the way Climate change Seeing the light ©Marcelo Del Pozo/Reuters ©Marcelo ©Rodi Said/Reuters ©Rodi CONTENTS No 304 Novemberr 2015 EDITORIAL 30 Business brief: ARDCI on how regional BOOKS 2 Overcoming climate change and unleashing authorities in Africa are now getting involved 65 Reviews: Renewable workers; Groundwater a dynamic, zero-carbon economy in the fi ght against climate change by making is not so well Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD concrete commitments 66-67 New publications 3 Paris attacks 31 There are no jobs on a dead planet 68 Review: Fossil folly; Crossword John Evans, General Secretary, Trade Union NEWS BRIEF Advisory Committee to the OECD (TUAC) DATABANK 4-5 Growth prospects cloudy; OECD-G20 BEPS 32 Decarbonising transport: From smart technology to smart use 69 Mapping carbon emissions; Breaking down project endorsed; Drug spending slows; carbon emissions Soundbites; Economy; Country roundup; 34 Build more, build right: Development fi nance, infrastructure and climate change 70 Main economic indicators Helmut Schmidt; Other stories; Plus ça 72 Supporting green growth in Southeast Asia change Naeeda Crishna Morgado and Juan Casado- Asensio ORDER FORM… ORDER FORM CLIMATE CHANGE 36 Energy transitions,
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Climate Roadmap – Mission [Almost] Accomplished!
    1 A brief history of local government climate advocacy: the Local Government Climate Roadmap – mission [almost] accomplished! ICLEI BRIEFING SHEET - Climate Series, No. 01 On the eve of COP21, and what is hoped to be an ambitious and breakthrough global climate agreement, ICLEI takes a look back at 25 years of climate advocacy by local and subnational governments. In particular, the Local Government Climate Roadmap is concluding its eight year quest for the recognition, engagement, and empowerment of local and subnational governments as governmental stakeholders in the global climate regime. Key Messages • 2013 - 2015: the Local Government Climate Roadmap mission is accomplished, as the world • The threats to humanity and the planet posed by climate heads towards a climate deal at COP21 in Paris change cannot be addressed without the engagement 2015. After eight years of immense mobilization at all of local governments. However, prior to the founding of levels, the Local Government Climate Roadmap has ICLEI in 1990, cities did not widely discuss the threat of managed to reach its overarching goals. It has secured climate change, nor did they have a representative voice recognition of local and subnational governments in international climate discussions. (e.g. through COP decisions), engagement (e.g. in ADP Technical Examination Processes, Friends of Cities) and • In 2007, ICLEI launched the Local Government Climate empowerment (e.g. with new financing programs) within Roadmap with the mission to promote the recognition, the global climate
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and Latin America Towards More Ambitious Collective Climate Action
    EUROPE AND LATIN AMERICA TOWARDS MORE AMBITIOUS COLLECTIVE CLIMATE ACTION By Hans JH Verolme with Enrique Maurtua Konstantinidis and Paola Vasconi Reca Will the international community manage to conclude a fair and values, Latin America and the European Union could strengthen ambitious global agreement in Paris in 2015? their bi-regional partnership and develop new narratives that might help to overcome the North-South division. In spite of the frustration with the slow progress of multilat- eral processes, civil society across the world continuously tries This report provides an introduction to European and Latin to push leaders to commit to meaningful climate action. An American civil society perspectives on international climate ambitious and fair global climate deal can only be reached, if change policy and politics. Europe and Latin America can learn alliances can be formed that go beyond the binary split between a lot from each other and there is significant scope for deeper developed and developing countries. collaboration to increase climate ambition. By exploring the po- tential of joint demands and proposals, the report shows how The European Union plays a key role in international climate Europe and Latin America can ally towards more ambitious negotiations and should strengthen and build new alliances for collective climate action. We hope this analysis innspires civil an ambitious outcome in Paris. With the 2014 Climate Summit society organisations and democratic institutions to further ex- taking place in Lima, Latin America is put into the spotlight of plore the potential for collaboration between Europe and Latin the international climate scene. Based on shared history and America to tackle the global climate crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Non-State Climate Action: a Progress Assessment of Commitments Launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit
    Strengthening non-state climate action: a progress assessment of commitments launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit Sander Chan, Robert Falkner, Harro van Asselt and Matthew Goldberg November 2015 Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 242 Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 216 The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment was established by the London School of Economics and Political Science in 2008 to bring together international expertise on economics, finance, geography, the environment, international development and political economy to create a world- leading centre for policy-relevant research and training. The Institute is funded by the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment and the Global Green Growth Institute. It has nine research programmes: 1. Adaptation and development 2. Carbon trading and finance 3. Ecosystems, resources and the natural environment 4. Energy, technology and trade 5. Future generations and social justice 6. Growth and the economy 7. International environmental negotiations 8. Modelling and decision making 9. Private sector adaptation, risk and insurance More information about the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment can be found at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham. The Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) was established by the University of Leeds and the London School of Economics and Political Science in 2008 to advance public and private action on climate change through innovative, rigorous research. The Centre is funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council. Its second phase started in 2013 and there are five integrated research themes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Understanding NAZCA: Challenges and Future of the World's Largest
    Understanding NAZCA: Challenges and Future of the World's Largest Voluntary Climate Action Platform A Memo Prepared by Yale University Angel Hsu, Yaping Cheng, Amy Weinfurter, Kaiyang Xu, and Cameron Yick April 2016 1 Table of Contents Acronyms Summary for Policymakers Introduction A. Key Figures & Data Comparability A-1. Cities and Regions A-2. Companies A-3. Investors and Civil Society Organizations A-4. Green bonds A-5. Double Counting Issues B. Data providers B-1. Overview of data providers B-2. Existing data providers and schemes B-3. Potential new data partners C. Homogenization of commitments by themes C-1. Emissions Reduction (ER) C-2. Energy Access & Efficiency (EAE) C-3. Renewable Energy (RE) C-4. Private Finance (PF) C-5. Use of Carbon Price (UCP) C-6. Other C-7. Forestry C-8. Transport C-9. Buildings C-10. Agriculture C-11. Resilience C-12. Short-term pollutant (STP) C-13. Innovation D. Aggregation for greater significance and level of confidence E. Suggestions for improvement Appendix I: Overview of NAZCA’s Data Providers Note: The number of commitments on NAZCA and the number of scraped commitments do not match exactly, due to technical challenges such as empty pages and repetitive entries of the NAZCA website. This paper is based on a custom database the Yale team built from scraping and cleaning the NAZCA data as of February 28, 2016. This customized process has allowed for a more accurate database by which to analyze the composition and meaning of non-state and sub-national climate actions recorded in NAZCA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for 2 Degrees Scenario Analysis
    A FRAMEWORK FOR 2 DEGREES SCENARIO ANALYSIS: A Guide for Oil and Gas Companies and Investors for Navigating the Energy Transition ABOUT CERES Ceres is a non-profit organization that is mobilizing many of the world’s largest companies and investors to take stronger action on climate change, water scarcity and other global sustainability challenges. Ceres directs the Investor Network on Climate Risk, a group of 124 institutional investors managing $15 trillion in assets focused on the business risks and opportunities of climate change and water scarcity. Ceres also engages with 100-plus companies, many of them Fortune 500 businesses, committed to sustainable business practices and the urgency for strong climate and clean energy policies. For more information, visit www.ceres.org or follow on Twitter@CeresNews. ABOUT AMY MYERS JAFFE Amy Myers Jaffe is a leading expert on global energy policy, geopolitical risk, and energy and sustainability. Jaffe serves as executive director for Energy and Sustainability at University of California, Davis, and as senior advisor, energy and sustainability to the Office of the Chief Investment Officer of the Regents, University of California. She is associate editor (North America) for the academic journal Energy Strategy Reviews and serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Economics and Energy and Environmental Policy. Jaffe’s research focuses on sustainable investment, corporate investment strategies in the energy sector, and oil and gas geopolitics. Jaffe is also a global fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington D.C. ABOUT CERES’ CARBON ASSET RISK (CAR) INITIATIVE Persistently low oil prices, the success of the Paris Agreement, and the rapid evolution of clean energy technologies have combined to present the oil and gas industry with a significant risk to its business model.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions Gap Report 2018 © 2018 United Nations Environment Programme November 2018
    Emissions Gap Report 2018 © 2018 United Nations Environment Programme November 2018 ISBN: 978-92-807-3726-4 Job number: DEW/2210/NA This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UN Environment would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication Emissions Gap Report 2018 that uses this publication as a source. November 2018 No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UN Environment. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Communication Division, UN Environment, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. For general guidance on matters relating to the use of maps in publications please go to http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm Disclaimers Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by UN Environment or the authors. The use of information from this document for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion with no intention on infringement of trademark or copyright laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer on Hfcs
    Primer on HFCs Fast action under the Montreal Protocol can limit growth of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), prevent 100 to 200 billion tonnes of CO2-eq by 2050, and avoid up to 0.5°C of warming by 2100 Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development IGSD Working Paper: 12 September 2016 Lead authors Durwood Zaelke, Nathan Borgford-Parnell, and Stephen O. Andersen. Contributing authors Kristin Campbell, Xiaopu Sun, Dennis Clare, Claire Phillips, Stela Herschmann, Yuzhe Peng Ling, Alex Milgroom, and Nancy J. Sherman. Acknowledgements We thank our outside reviewers for their valuable contributions. About the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development (IGSD) IGSD’s mission is to promote just and sustainable societies and to protect the environment by advancing the understanding, development, and implementation of effective and accountable systems of governance for sustainable development. Beginning in 2005, IGSD embarked on a “fast-action” climate mitigation campaign that will result in significant reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and will limit temperature increase and other climate impacts in the near term. The focus is primarily on strategies to reduce non-CO2 climate pollutants as a complement to cuts in CO2, which is responsible for more than half of all warming. It is essential to reduce both non-CO2 pollutants and CO2. Neither alone is sufficient to limit the increase in global temperature to a safe level. IGSD’s fast-action strategies include reducing emissions of short-lived climate pollutants—black carbon, methane, tropospheric ozone, and hydrofluorocarbons. They also include measures to promote energy efficiency of air conditioners and other appliances, and measures to capture, reuse, and store CO2 after it is emitted, including biosequestration and mineralization strategies that turn carbon dioxide into stable forms for long-term storage while enhancing sustainable food supply.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE BUSINESS JOURNAL® Volume VII, No
    on for the Clim mati ate C for han In g ic e I g nd te u a s r t t r S y CLIMATE CHANGE BUSINESS JOURNAL® Volume VII, No. 10-12 Fourth Quarter 2014 Climate Change Service Climate Change Industry Drivers 2014 Providers Track Growth to While climate change continues to be discussed at the global, regional, national, Non-Regulatory Drivers state and local levels, distinct market drivers to propel growth in climate change industry segments remain few and far between. Nevertheless a number of corpo- he December 2014 Lima climate rate and government initiatives are keeping technology and services providers busy. change talks concluded with an outcome that was relatively Greenhouse Gas Reporting: Consultants help clients derive bottom line value Tsuccessful—as long as one didn’t expect from GHG and sustainability metrics; CPG and Retail focus on supply chains 4 a breakthrough agreement. Negotiators Climate Finance: The private sector favors mitigation projects, but consultants agreed on some key building blocks and see a trend towards funding more resilience and adaptation work. AECOM interim steps to prepare for the December Australia and independent consultant Michael Furniss refect on public and 2015 Paris meeting—most importantly, private sector fnancing for adaptation 9 that each country provide its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution Q&A With Climate Advisers: Andreas Dahl-Jørgensen, Managing Director (INDC) for greenhouse gas (GHG) of Climate Advisers, discusses the fast-moving development of corporate reductions by March 2015. commitments to source “zero-deforestation” commodities 14 At Paris in December 2015, nations Clean Power Plan will create demand for counsel, consulting and scenario planning: will agree on—or fail to agree on—post- CCBJ explores the opportunities with Analysis Group, Black & Veatch, Crowell and Mor- 2020 climate change mitigation and ing, ICF and Leidos Engineering 17 adaptation goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Emission Development to Achieve PROGRAM BOOK
    Low Emission Development to Achieve CARBON NEUTRALITY AND SDGs :12th International Greenhouse Gas Conference PROGRAM BOOK Low Emission Development to Achieve CARBON NEUTRALITY AND SDGs :12th International Greenhouse Gas Conference PROGRAM 14:00 – 14:27 OPENING SESSION Opening Remarks Heung-Won Seo President of Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center (GIR) Welcoming Remarks Han Jeoung Ae Minister of Environment, Republic of Korea Park Nam-choon Mayor of Incheon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea Congratulatory Remarks Liu Zhenmin Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations (UN DESA) Yeonseob Ha Executive Vice President of International Campus, Yonsei University 14:27 – 15:05 LAUNCHING THE DECADE OF ACTION IN KOREA & THE 2ND PHASE OF UNOSD Video Decade of Action Video Presentation on 2nd phase of UNOSD Chun Kyoo Park Head, United Nations Office for Sustainable Development (UNOSD) Message from Stakeholders Sun-Jin Yun Chair, Sustainable Development Committee, Republic of Korea Kim Hong-jang Chair, Korea Local Governments Alliance for Sustainable Development Kyung-Ho Lee Chair, Korea Business Council for Sustainable Development Yelin Heo Chair, Youth-Level Political Forum Korea (YLPF Korea) Launching Ceremony Decade of Action in Korea and 2nd phase of UNOSD Launching Ceremony 15:05 – 15:20 PHOTO SESSION & BREAK Low Emission Development to Achieve Carbon Neutrality and SDGs Low Emission Development to Achieve Carbon Neutrality and SDGs 02 : 12th International Greenhouse Gas Conference : 12th International
    [Show full text]