DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H1885

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

April 1, 1998 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H1885 Rush Smith (TX) Tierney LAYING ON THE TABLE HOUSE In fact, that is the way it was, until Ryun Smith, Adam Torres Sabo Smith, Linda Towns RESOLUTION 309 AND HOUSE in the mid-1960's President Johnson got Salmon Snowbarger Traficant RESOLUTION 403 the idea that by not spending the Sanchez Snyder Turner Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, I ask money, he could help fund the Vietnam Sanders Solomon Upton War. Sandlin Souder Velazquez unanimous consent that House Resolu- Sanford Spence Vento tion 309, dealing with the rule on fast Indeed, it was Eisenhower and the Sawyer Spratt Visclosky track, and House Resolution 403, deal- Congress which made a Contract with Saxton Stabenow Walsh America, and that contract was you Scarborough Stark Wamp ing with the rule on the bank reform Schaffer, Bob Stearns Watt (NC) bill, be laid on the table. pay your gas tax, and that money is Schumer Stenholm Watts (OK) The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. spent to improve highways. Unfortu- Scott Stokes Waxman HEFLEY). Is there objection to the re- nately, in the past several years, we Sensenbrenner Strickland Weldon (FL) have had a fraud perpetrated on the Serrano Stump Weldon (PA) quest of the gentleman from New Sessions Stupak Weller York? American people. It has not happened. Shadegg Sununu Wexler There was no objection. We have had abate and switch. You pay Shaw Talent Weygand your gas tax, but the money in the Shays Tanner White f Sherman Tauscher Whitfield trust fund does not get spent. To the Shimkus Tauzin Wicker BUILDING EFFICIENT SURFACE tune, there is $23 billion in that High- Shuster Taylor (MS) Wise TRANSPORTATION AND EQUITY way Trust Fund today. Sisisky Taylor (NC) Wolf ACT OF 1998 Let me share with Members some- Skaggs Thomas Woolsey Skeen Thompson Wynn The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- thing that a very well-known American Skelton Thornberry Yates ant to House Resolution 405 and rule said when he was Governor of a State Slaughter Thune Young (AK) XXIII, the Chair declares the House in just a few years ago. He said this on Smith (MI) Thurman Young (FL) television: ``The Congress took that Smith (NJ) Tiahrt the Committee of the Whole on the State of the Union for the consider- money from us under a solemn con- NAYSÐ8 ation of the bill, H.R. 2400. tract to turn right around and give it Bachus Hostettler Schaefer, Dan back to the States to be spent on roads b 1340 Barton Paul Watkins and highways. Instead, they are hoard- Gillmor Paxon IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ing that money up there, and the only NOT VOTINGÐ11 Accordingly, the House resolved reason is to make the Federal deficit Cannon Kennedy (MA) Royce itself into the Committee of the Whole look smaller than it is. It is just Condit Klug Smith (OR) House on the State of the Union for the wrong. It is wrong as it can be, and we Gonzalez Payne Waters Jefferson Rangel consideration of the bill (H.R. 2400) to ought to stop it. It is in violation of authorize funds for Federal-aid high- the solemn contract the national gov- b 1336 ways, highway safety programs, and ernment has to the people who pay the Mr. PAXON and Mr. BARTON of transit programs, and for other pur- tax.'' Governor Bill Clinton. Texas changed their vote from ``yea'' poses, with Mr. HASTINGS of Washing- So I say now to the Clinton Adminis- to ``nay.'' ton in the chair. tration, join us. Keep your word. Help Messrs. DOYLE, HEFNER, The Clerk read the title of the bill. us unlock the trust fund so that money The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to the CHRISTENSEN and MEEHAN changed can go where it is supposed to go, to rule, the bill is considered as having their vote from ``nay'' to ``yea.'' improve America's transportation in- been read the first time. So (two-thirds having voted in favor frastructure. Under the rule, the gentleman from thereof) the rules were suspended and We swallowed hard in the committee Pennsylvania (Mr. SHUSTER) and the the bill, as amended, was passed. to get where we are today on a couple gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. OBER- The title of the bill was amended so of very, very important compromises. STAR) each will control one hour, and as to read: ``A bill to amend the Fed- We agreed that from this point for- the gentleman from Texas (Mr. AR- eral Credit Union Act to clarify exist- ward, we would not count the interest CHER) and the gentleman from New ing law with regard to the field of in the trust fund. York (Mr. RANGEL) will each control 15 membership of Federal credit unions, Over the life of this bill, that means minutes. to preserve the integrity and purpose $15 billion in debt reduction for our The Chair recognizes the gentleman of federal credit unions, to enhance su- country. And we swallowed hard and from Pennsylvania (Mr. SHUSTER). said that approximately $10 billion of pervisory oversight of insured credit Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Chairman, I yield unions, and for other purposes.'' the $23 billion in the balance will be re- myself such time as I may consume. turned. A motion to reconsider was laid on (Mr. SHUSTER asked and was given b the table. permission to revise and extend his re- 1345 f marks.) Put those two figures together and Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Chairman, today you get about $25 billion in reduced PERSONAL EXPLANATION we bring to the floor of the House his- debt for the Federal Government, an Mr. CONDIT. Mr. Speaker, I was unavoid- toric legislation, legislation to rebuild amount which approximates the in- able detained for roll call vote 92, The Credit America so that we have a 21st Century crease in spending that this bill pro- Union Membership Access Act. Had I been transportation system. In the 21st Cen- poses. We only spend the revenue com- present, I would have voted aye. I would ask tury, from Seattle to Miami, from New ing into this Trust Fund from this that this be reflected in the RECORD in the ap- York to California, America is growing point forward. We only spend the propriate section. and prospering, but our infrastructure money paid for by the American people is crumbling. in the gas tax and the related transpor- f There are two fundamental principles tation taxes. Indeed, the projection is in the bill we bring to the floor today. we come in over the 6-year period GENERAL LEAVE The first is to put the trust back in the about $3 billion under the revenue com- Mr. BEREUTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask Transportation Trust Funds. It is to re- ing in. unanimous consent that all Members store honesty in budgeting. I would be quick to say, if there is no may have 5 legislative days within Every time an American drives up to need to spend this money, we certainly which to revise and extend their re- the gas pump and pays his or her 18.4- should not spend it, nor should we let marks and include extraneous material cent gas tax for every gallon of tax, it accumulate. We should reduce the on H.R. 1151, as amended. that money goes into the Highway taxes. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to Trust Fund and Americans have the So that brings me to, really, the sec- the request of the gentleman from Ne- right to believe that the money in the ond fundamental principle: That is, braska? trust fund is going to be spent to im- what are the needs for investment in There was no objection. prove transportation. infrastructure for America? I suggest H1886 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE April 1, 1998 that the needs are very clear; indeed, naysayers, we would have thought we to other categories, should the States they are overwhelming. Twenty-seven would have squeaked through, at best. and the localities so choose. percent of the highways in America are Instead, when the vote came, it was six Beyond that, we recognize the na- in poor condition. The average Amer- to one overwhelmingly in support of tional interest. Those who talk about ican is stuck 26 hours out of every year the rule for this bill. just give it all back to the States I in traffic. That does not really tell the Who are the supporters of this bill? It think must be living in 1920 instead of whole story. The average American liv- is not just us. All 50 governors have en- 1998. Interestingly, there is a greater ing in one of our big cities is stuck in dorsed this bill. The League of Cities, Federal interest today to tie our coun- traffic, bumper-to-bumper traffic, over the mayors have endorsed this bill. The try together than there has ever been. 50 hours in a year, more than a work- counties have endorsed this bill. The Why? Because we have more interstate week in a year. State legislatures have endorsed this travel than we have ever had. Indeed, on our highways, 42,000 Amer- bill. Environmentalists have endorsed I love to refer to Oklahoma City as icans are killed every year. Of that this bill. Safety groups have endorsed an example. Out there, you have two 42,000, 9,000 are kids killed on our high- this bill. Labor, the AFL-CIO and the interstates that cross, 35 and 40. They ways. The experts tell us that 30 per- Chamber of Commerce, what a pair, were built to carry 60,000 vehicles a cent of highway fatalities are caused have both endorsed this legislation.
Recommended publications
  • Moline Centre Master Plan Update on the Mississippi November 13, 2001

    Moline Centre Master Plan Update on the Mississippi November 13, 2001

    Moline Centre Master Plan Update on the Mississippi November 13, 2001 City of Moline, Illinois Renew Moline Prepared by: Acknowledgements Table of Contents CITY OF MOLINE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Acknowledgements........................................................... 1 Maps Stanley Leach, Mayor John Wetzel, Chairman Table of Contents ............................................................. 1 Map 1: Economic Links................................................... 7 Jeff Nelson Introduction....................................................................... 2 Map 2: Redevelopment Districts .................................... 9 RENEW MOLINE Bob Nelson Methods-Opportunity Analysis ...................................... 3 Map 3: Master Plan ......................................................... 11 Tom Robinson, President Jim Graham Map 4: Parking ................................................................ 13 Pete McDermott Opportunity Analysis................................. 4 Map 5: Wayfinding .......................................................... 15 Roger Strandlund Opportunities .................................................................... 4 CITY COUNCIL Diane Reinsch Map 6: Preservation & Redevelopment ....................... 17 Timothy Bell Pat Gormley Economic Links ................................................................ 6 Map 7: Design & Enhancements.................................. 18 Pat O’Brien Marilyn Ade Districts .............................................................................
  • 2004 Master Plan

    2004 Master Plan

    Acknowledgements Development of this plan was funded through a planning services agreement with the Massachusetts Interagency Work Group (IAWG) under the Community Development Planning Program. Funding for this program was provided by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, the Department of Housing and Community Development, the Department of Economic Development, and the Executive Office of Transportation and Construction. Prepared by the Ware Community Development Committee in cooperation with the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission Credits Ware Community Development Committee Camille Cote Members: Jack McQuaid, Selectboard Paul Hills-Community Development Gerald Matta, Selectboard Director Gini and John Desmond Nancy Talbot-School Committee/ Town John Stasko Clerk John M. Prenosil Kelly Hudson-School Committee Deborah Pelloni Gilbert St. George-Sorel-Director of Maggie Sorel Public Works –Water Department David Gravel Joan Butler-Ware Adult Education Bill Bradley Center John Lasek James Kubinski-Selectboard Chris Labbe Jason Nochese, Town Treasurer and Claudia Chicklas-Chairman, Historical Collector Commission Frank Tripoli-Advisory Committee for the Evie Glickman-Valley Human Services, Community Development Department Inc. Mary Harder Chad Mullin-Public Affairs Department, Denis R. Ouimette, Finance Committee Mary Jane Hospital and Greenways Trail Committee PVPC Staff: Christopher Curtis, Principal Planner Denis Superczynski, Senior Planner Rebekah McDermott, Planner Jim Scace, Senior Planner-GIS Specialist Tim Doherty, Transportation
  • Downtown Visioning Initiative I N D I a N A

    Downtown Visioning Initiative I N D I a N A

    H U N T I N G T O N 2012 DOWNTOWN VISIONING INITIATIVE I N D I A N A Ball State University • Community- Based Projects Imagine Huntington Table of Contents What is CBP?.....2-3 Placemaking in Downtown Huntington Goals and Objectives.....36-37 Community Profile Summary....4-5 Design Guidelines.....38-39 Ecology and Sustainability.....40-41 What is Huntington?....6-7 Parks and Open Space.....42-43 Demographics.....8-9 Learning in Downtown Huntington Goals and Objectives.....44-45 Survey Results....10-11 Lifelong Learning.....46-47 Imagine Downtown Huntington.....12-13 Working in Downtown Huntington Goals and Objectives.....48-49 Enjoying Downtown Huntington Work Opportunities.....50-51 Goals and Objectives.....14-15 Arts.....16-19 Moving Around in Downtown Huntington Amphitheater….16 Goals and Objectives.....52-53 Art Education….17 Transportation.....54-55 Local Artists and Placemaking …..18-19 Complete Streets…..54 Shuttle Service and Public Transit…..55 Tourism.....20-21 Recreation.....22-23 Infrastructure....56-59 Shopping and Dining.....24-29 Efficient Parking 56 Attracting Businesses….24-25 Stormwater Management 57 Food co-op…..26-27 Wayfinding Signage 58-59 Riverfront Retail and Dining…..28-29 Two Scenarios Living in Downtown Huntington Expanding Downtown.....60 Goals and Objectives.....30-31 Riverfront Destination.....61 Housing.....32-35 Residential in the Downtown…..32-33 Huntington University Off-Campus Housing…..34-35 2012 Community Visioning Initiative 1 What is the Community-Based Project Program? Community Based Project Program (CBP) has been helping Indiana communities for over 40 years through Ball State University’s Department of Urban Planning and the College of Architecture and Planning.
  • Organizations & Departments with Oversight

    Organizations & Departments with Oversight

    A Civic Vision for the Central Delaware 2 PennPraxis WRT William Penn Foundation F O R E W O R D The William Penn Foundation, founded in 1945 by Otto and Phoebe Haas, is dedicated to improving the quality of life in the Greater Philadelphia region. We seek to build on the region’s assets and enhance the economic competitiveness of Greater Philadelphia. We have long believed that the Delaware River is one of our region’s most significant assets. For more than a decade, the Foundation has sought to promote the historically industrialized Delaware Riverfront as a both a natural and community resource. In recent years the riverfront has experienced tremendous redevelopment pressure. However, due to the absence of an effective master plan and weak land use controls, most of this development has occurred in an ad-hoc and uncoordinated manner, raising concerns that the city would fail to fully maximize the waterfront’s economic and community development benefits and potential to deliver important new public access and amenities. In response to these concerns, the Foundation launched the central Delaware riverfront planning process to provide needed planning resources for the waterfront. We also sought a new model for large-scale, open, transparent civic visioning and planning that we hope will be replicable elsewhere in Philadelphia and will set a new standard for public access and participation in the city’s development decisions. Although Philadelphia has come late to the waterfront development game, our tardiness gives us one important advantage – we can learn from the experiences of many other cities.
  • Report Reflect the Views of the Authors, Who Are Responsible for the Facts and the Accuracy of the Data Presented Herein

    Report Reflect the Views of the Authors, Who Are Responsible for the Facts and the Accuracy of the Data Presented Herein

    Carter&Riverfront:&Reimagining&the&Scranton&Peninsula& A"Capstone"Project"of"Cleveland"State"University’s"UST"611"Planning"Studio!! May,"2015 Two Visions: Transforming the Scranton Planning Studio Peninsula, Cleveland, Ohio Students Ayden Ergun Alethea Ganaway Rachel Gruic Timothy Holcomb Brandon Isner William Jones Steven Kanner Nathaniel Neider Julie Quinn Julia Schnell Megan Shockey Kessa Turnbull Xin Xu Instructors Professor Jim Kastelic Professor Wendy Kellogg Carter&Riverfront:&Reimagining&the&Scranton&Peninsula& A!Capstone!Project!of!Cleveland!State!University’s!UST!611!Planning! Studio!! May, 2015 Prepared for Forest City Enterprises The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the In Fulfillment of official views or policies of the Cleveland State University or Forest City Enterprises (which Cleveland State University’s, Levin College of paid a stipend to the CSU program in order to participate as a client). Urban Affairs 2015 UST 611Urban Planning All material contained in this document are open source and available to anyone at no cost. It Studio requirements may not be resold without the permission of the authors. When citing this work, proper credit is required . Please cite as follows: This Paper is Available on Our Website CSU, Levin College of Urban Affairs, 2015 UST 611Urban Planning Studio ( Ergun, A., https:// carter-riverfront.com Ganaway, A., Gruic, R., Holcomb, T., Isner, B., Jones,
  • 06 CVCD Parks-And-Open-Space

    06 CVCD Parks-And-Open-Space

    Purpose General Findings Goals 6 Early Action Create New Parks Connect the City to the Riverfront Invest in a Sustainable Riverfront AND OPEN PARKS SPACE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Port Richmond Riverfront Park In coordination with GreenPlan Philadelphia the civic vision recommends a park system that connects across city neighborhoods and along the river’s edge. A park at the end of Lehigh Avenue serves potential job centers to the north and south and is connected to Delaware Boulevard, a riverfront trail and a Lehigh Viaduct cross-city trail. 6 Parks and Open Space The central Delaware riverfront is severely lacking in public open space, but it has the potential to host a world-class park system. Currently, there are only two public parks in the project area, Penn Treaty Park and Pulaski Park, and these occupy just eight of the area’s 1,146 acres. Another possible park location would be Penn’s Landing, a hard-surfaced, signifi cantly underutilized public asset in need of revitalization. A more extensive, contiguous and designed system of open spaces at the river’s edge would improve quality of life for neighbors, increase the value of future development, preserve and support natural life and attract visitors from across the region. Parks and Open Space 119 Purpose The purpose of the following recommendations on parks and open Parks and open spaces also have important health benefits for space is to improve the quality of life along the riverfront and the river residents, as well as for the city as a whole. Having such recreational itself by building a network of public open spaces that are ecologically assets increases activity levels and therefore improves the health of productive and attractive.
  • Ontario International Student Guide

    Ontario International Student Guide

    ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL STUDENT GUIDE International Student Étudiants Internationaux CONNECT SE CONNECTENT Contents CANADA................................................................................................ 2 Canadian Cultural Values and Beliefs .........................................................4 ONTARIO ............................................................................................ 10 Multicultural Society .........................................................................................11 Ontario’s Climate ...............................................................................................12 Franco-Ontario...................................................................................................13 French-language and Bilingual Colleges and Universities ............... 14 EDUCATION IN ONTARIO................................................................. 16 Post-Secondary Programs .............................................................................17 Language Requirements .............................................................................. 20 Financial Resources ........................................................................................21 LIVING IN ONTARIO ..........................................................................22 Housing ................................................................................................................22 Banking and Finance ....................................................................................
  • Hampshire Bird Club, Inc. Amherst, Massachusetts May, 2015

    Hampshire Bird Club, Inc. Amherst, Massachusetts May, 2015

    1 Hampshire Bird Club, Inc. Amherst, Massachusetts www.hampshirebirdclub.org Volume 31, No. 9 May, 2015. In this edition: • The program this month, and the last remaining program for the year, • field trip reports and the crowded trip schedule for the next month, • some great offerings from the Education Committee , • the Annual General Meeting announcement, • a call-to-arms from the Refreshment Committee , • Celebrate Birds : a family birding festival in the valley, • Hitchcock and Broad Brook Coalition programs, and • a plea on behalf of the Worthington cranes . I hope you find some of it useful. NEXT PROGRAM Monday, May 11 at 7:15 p.m. Jonah Keane joins us to shed light on Arcadia: The Past, Present and Future of Mass Audubon in the Pioneer Valley Immanuel Lutheran Church; 867 North Pleasant Street, Amherst. Jonah Keane will discuss the work of the country’s oldest Audubon society. Mass Audubon has been active in the Valley for over 70 years, though questions exist about how they function, the breadth of their work, and what their connection to birds is in the 21 st century. Jonah will answer these questions as well as outline their vision locally for the coming years. He’ll also describe the birds and habitat management that occur at Arcadia Wildlife Sanctuary and why Arcadia is one of the Valley’s natural gems. Jonah is the Sanctuary Director for Mass Audubon’s Connecticut River Valley Sanctuaries and is based at Arcadia Wildlife Sanctuary in Easthampton and Northampton. He started in his position in January 2014 after nine years managing programs with the Student Conservation Association.
  • Ltie Commonweactii of Nussachusetts Wecutive Ofice of Environmentalaffairs IOO Cam6dge Street, Suite 900 Boston, Mfl02114

    Ltie Commonweactii of Nussachusetts Wecutive Ofice of Environmentalaffairs IOO Cam6dge Street, Suite 900 Boston, Mfl02114

    ltie CommonweaCtIi of Nussachusetts wecutive Ofice of EnvironmentalAffairs IOO cam6dge Street, Suite 900 Boston, Mfl02114 Deval Patrick GOVERNOR Timothy Murray LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ' Tel: (61 7) 626-100( Ian Bodes Fax: (6 17) 626-1 18 1 SECRETARY httpJ/www.mass.gov/envi 'February 8,2007 CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM PROJECT NAME: 1-9 1 at Route 9 (Interchange 19) Interchange Improvement Project PROJECT MUNICIPALITY: Northampton PROJECT WATERSHED: Connecticut River EOEA NUMBER: 13935 PROJECT PROPONENT: Massachusetts Highway Department DATE NOTICED IN MONITOR: December 23,2006 Pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (G. L. c. 30, ss. 61-62H) and Section 1 1.06 of the MEPA regulations (301 CMR 1 1.00), I hereby determine that this project does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Proiect Description As described in the Environmental Notification Form (ENF), the Massachusetts Highway Department (MassHighway) is proposing to reconfigure the I-91IRoute 9 Interchange (Interchange 19) to provide access in all directions to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety. The project aims to alleviate existing interchange operation deficiencies attributed to traffic volumes on Route 9, the strong reliance on the Calvin Coolidge Bridge (Route 9) as a means to cross the Connecticut River, and the current partial interchange layout of Interchange 19. The project is consistent with the long-term improvement recommendations of the .Connecticut
  • Allocation of FY 2000 Funding for High Priority Projects

    Allocation of FY 2000 Funding for High Priority Projects

    Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration HIPA-1100-Q92-0009 Subject: ACTION: Allocation of FY 2000 Funding for Date: November 18, 1999 High Priority Projects (Demonstration Projects) - Section 1602 of TEA-21 Reply to From: Henry H. Rentz Attn. of: HIPA-10 Director of Program Administration To: Division Administrators Section 1101(a)(13) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21, P.L. 105-178), as amended by the TEA-21 Restoration Act (Title IX of P.L. 105-206), authorized $9,359,850,000 from the Highway Trust Fund over a 6-year period for the 1851 high priority projects listed in Section 1602, as amended by the FY 2000 Department of Transportation (DOT) Appropriations Act (Public Law 106-69). Of these funds, $1,684,773,000, or 18 percent, is authorized for FY 2000. In addition, the FY 2000 DOT Appropriations Act provides $90,000,000 in revenue aligned budget authority (RABA) for the high priority projects. This RABA is proportionally shared by the 1851 high priority projects based upon the authorized amount for each project in Section 1602 of TEA-21. We are hereby allocating $1,757,229,138 to the States for FY 2000 for the high priority projects as shown on Attachment 1. This allocation does not include funds that are being provided directly to Federal Lands Highway or to other Federal agencies at the request of the involved States. These funds are being allocated in separate memorandums. The program code for these funds is Q92. The funds are available until expended and are subject to obligation limitation.
  • Pioneer Valley Region Congestion Management System Pioneer

    Pioneer Valley Region Congestion Management System Pioneer

    PioneerPioneer ValleyValley RegionRegion CongestionCongestion ManagementManagement SystemSystem prepared for the pionner valley metropolitan planning organization Update on Status of Current CMS Projects Moving Recommended CMS Strategies to the Next Step FINAL REPORT April, 2005 This document was prepared under contract with the Executive Office of Transportation, with the cooperation of the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. PIONEER VALLEY REGION CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Prepared For the Pioneer Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization UPDATE ON STATUS OF CURRENT CMS PROJECTS FINAL REPORT Moving Recommended CMS Strategies to the Next Step April 2005 This document was prepared under contract with the Executive Office of Transportation, with the cooperation of the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. REGIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 2 III. TRAVEL TIME RUNS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 IV. LOCATION SPECIFIC SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................................
  • Before Coolidge Bridge Reconstruction

    Before Coolidge Bridge Reconstruction

    Travel Behavior Study of Route 9 and Route 116 Commuters: Before Coolidge Bridge Reconstruction. Project No. UMAR12-10 UTC Year 12 Emily Parkany University of Massachusetts/Amherst [email protected] (610) 519-4957 October 2004 Submitted to New England (Region One) UTC Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Travel Behavior Study of Route 9 and Route 116 Commuters: Before Coolidge October 2004 Bridge Reconstruction 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Emily Parkany 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Massachusetts/Amherst, Transportation Center, Marston Hall, Amherst, MA 01003 11. Contract or Grant No. DTRS99-G-0001 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered New England (Region One) UTC Final Report for UTC Year 12 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room E40-278 Cambridge, MA 02139 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the US Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program 16. Abstract There is a huge body of literature in social psychology describing seventy years of theory and experimentation relating attitudes to behavior. Much of it suggests a stronger causal link between choices and attitudes than between attitudes and choices— attitude models conditioned on revealed choice explain more than knowing peoples’ attitudes and determining what choice they will make. Alternate analyses suggest that we need to use attitudinal and other data to determine respondents’ intentions rather than desires in order to better predict behavior.