Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds Second Draft of Second Revision

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds Second Draft of Second Revision U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds Second Draft of Second Revision Clockwise from upper left: Hawaiian clacks, Hawaiian stilt, Hawaiian common moorhen, and Hawaiian coot. ©Erie A. VanderWerf. Used with permission. AR00045351 Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, Second Draft of Second Revision (May 2005) (Original approved 1978; First Revision approved 1985; First Draft of Second Revision released May 1999) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Regional Director, Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX AR00045352 Second Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, 2nd Revision • May 2005 Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, Tribal agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific actions and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in recovery plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Recovery plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to peer review before we adopt them as approved final documents. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Notice of copyrighted material: Permission to use copyrighted images in this recovery plan has been granted by the copyright holders. These images are not placed in the public domain by their appearance herein. They cannot be copied or otherwise reproduced, except in their printed context within this document, without the written consent of the copyright holder. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, Second Draft of Second Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. 155 pp. Electronic copies of this document will be made available at: • http://pacific.fws.goviecoservicesiendangeredirecoveryidefault.htm • http://endangered.fws.govirecovery/index.html AR00045353 Second Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, 2nd Revision • May 2005 Acknowledgments Parts I and II of this recovery plan were drafted in 1997 for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by Andrew Engilis, Jr. (then of Ducks Unlimited, currently of University of California, Davis) and Dr. Frederic A. Reid of the Western Regional Office of Ducks Unlimited. Modifications were made by Dr. Ann Marshall of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which resulted in the Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds Second Revision dated May 1999. Since then, substantial revisions to the draft plan have been made by Leilani Takano and Dr. Eric VanderWerf of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, including the addition of figures illustrating the population trend of each species and maps showing their abundance and distribution on each island. The primary authors of this second draft revised plan are Andrew Engilis, Jr., Dr. Ann Marshall, Dr. Frederic A. Reid, Leilani Takano, and Dr. Eric VanderWerf. For valuable input and constructive comments on waterbird recovery issues we thank J. Michael Reed of Tufts University, Kim Uyehara, Sharon Reilly, and Jennifer Crummer of Ducks Unlimited; Fern Duvall, David Smith, John Polhemus, and Meyer Ueoka of the Hawai' i Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Forestry and Wildlife; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees Karen Gabble, Colleen Henson, Nancy Hoffman, Susan Machina, Mark Metevier, Lynda Myashita, Arlene Pangelinan, Gina Shultz, Mike Silbernagle, Gordon Smith, Chris Swenson, Ron Walker, and Marilet Zablan for valuable insights into waterbird recovery needs, assistance with graphics, and review of the recovery plan. We also thank the Hawai' i Division of Forestry and Wildlife for providing the biannual waterbird count data and the Hawai'i Natural Heritage Program for compiling the data. AR00045354 Second Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, 2nd Revision • May 2005 Executive Summary Current Species Status: This second draft revised recovery plan addresses four species of Hawaiian waterbirds: the Hawaiian duck or koloa maoli (Anas wyvilliana), Hawaiian coot or 'alae ke oke' o (Fulica alai), Hawaiian common moorhen or 'alae 'ula (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis), and Hawaiian stilt or ae' o (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), all listed as endangered. Historically, these four species were found on all of the main Hawaiian Islands except Lana i and Kaho' olawe. Currently, Hawaiian ducks are found on the islands of NF ihau, Kaua'i, 0' ahu, Maui, and Hawai' i; Hawaiian coots and stilts are found on all of the main Hawaiian Islands except Kaho' olawe; and Hawaiian common moorhens are found only on the islands of Kaua'i and 0' ahu. Population estimates based on the biannual waterbird count indicate the numbers of birds fluctuate among years and that currently none of these species consistently number more than 2,000 individuals, with the exception of the Hawaiian coot, but these estimates are reliable only for the coot and the stilt. Trend data collected over the past three decades show that Hawaiian coot, moorhen, and stilt populations are either stable or increasing. The status of the Hawaiian duck is difficult to judge due to the difficulty of distinguishing between Hawaiian ducks, feral mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), and hybrids. Hawaiian common moorhen numbers are difficult to estimate due to their secretive habits and use of densely vegetated wetland habitats. Habitat Requirements and Limiting Factors: These endangered Hawaiian waterbirds are found in a variety of wetland habitats including freshwater marshes and ponds, coastal estuaries and ponds, artificial reservoirs, taro (Colocasia esculenta) patches, irrigation ditches, sewage treatment ponds, and in the case of the Hawaiian duck, montane streams and swamplands. The most important cause of decline of the four species of endangered Hawaiian waterbirds is loss of wetland habitat. Other factors that have contributed to waterbird population declines, and which continue to be detrimental, include predation by introduced animals, altered hydrology, alteration of habitat by invasive nonnative plants, disease, and possibly environmental contaminants. Hunting in the late 1800's and early 1900's took a heavy toll on Hawaiian duck populations, and to a lesser extent on populations of the other three endemic waterbirds (Swedberg 1967). Currently, predation by introduced animals may be the greatest threat to the coot, moorhen, and stilt, and hybridization with feral mallards is the most serious threat to the Hawaiian duck. Recovery Priority Number: The recovery priority number for the Hawaiian duck is 2, on a scale of 1C (highest) to 18 (lowest; see Appendix D) reflecting a high degree of threat, a high potential for recovery, and the Hawaiian duck's taxonomic rank as a full AR00045355 Second Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Hawaiian Waterbirds, 2nd Revision • May 2005 species. The moorhen and stilt each have a recovery priority number of 9, reflecting a moderate degree of threat, a high potential for recovery, and their taxonomic rank as a subspecies. The recovery priority number of 14 for the Hawaiian coot reflects a low degree of threat, a high potential for recovery, and taxonomic rank as a full species. The Hawaiian coot was considered a subspecies of the American coot (Fulica americana) at the time it was listed, but it was recently split from the American coot and is now regarded as a distinct species (Fulica alai; American Ornithologists' Union 1989). Recovery Goal: The ultimate goal of the recovery program is to restore and maintain multiple self-sustaining populations of these Hawaiian waterbirds within their historical ranges, which will allow them to be reclassified to threatened status and eventually removed from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Recovery Objectives: The recovery of the endangered waterbirds focuses on the following objectives: 1) increasing population numbers to statewide baseline levels (consistently stable or increasing with a minimum of 2,000 birds for each species); 2) establishing multiple, self-sustaining breeding populations throughout each species' historical range; 3) establishing and protecting a network of both core and supporting wetlands that are managed as habitat suitable for waterbirds, including the maintenance of appropriate hydrological conditions and control of invasive nonnative plants; 4) for all four species, eliminating or controlling the threats posed by introduced predators, avian diseases, and contaminants; and 5) for the Hawaiian duck, removing the threat of hybridization with feral mallards. Recovery Criteria: For consideration of downlisting to threatened status, the following conditions must be met: Hawaiian Duck downlisting criteria Criterion 1. All core wetlands
Recommended publications
  • Metadata for Hawaii Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI)
    HYDRO Hawaii ESI: HYDRO (Hydrology Polygons and Lines) Metadata: Identification_Information Data_Quality_Information Spatial_Data_Organization_Information Spatial_Reference_Information Entity_and_Attribute_Information Distribution_Information Metadata_Reference_Information Identification_Information: Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington Publication_Date: 200111 Title: Hawaii ESI: HYDRO (Hydrology Polygons and Lines) Edition: Second Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Vector digital data Series_Information: Series_Name: None Issue_Identification: Hawaii Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Seattle, Washington Publisher: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington Other_Citation_Details: Prepared by Research Planning, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Hazardous Materials Response Division, Seattle, Washington Description: Abstract: This data set contains vector arcs and polygons representing coastal hydrography used in the creation of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) for Hawaii. The HYDRO data layer contains all annotation used in producing the atlas. The annotation features are categorized into
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    Inventory and Monitoring Plan Keālia Pond National Wildlife Refuge August 2019 June 2019 1 | Page Kellia Pond National Wildlife Refuge Inventory and Monitoring Plan Signature Page Action Signature /PriDted Name Date Bethany Chagnon (WiJdlife Refuge Specialist) By: Prcn,arecl Rachel Rounds (Zone l&M Biologist) Submitted By: Reviewed By: Reviewed By: Reviewed By: Approved By: Table of Contents Signature Page Introduction Methods Results References Appendices Appendix A. Key Legal Mandates and Policies for Inventorying and Monitoring Activities on Units of the NWRS Appendix B. Criteria Appendix B. Criteria and Weights Used to Prioritize Surveys (SMART Tool Table) Appendix C. Results: Prioritization Scores and Status All Ranked Surveys Appendix D. Brief Description of Non-selected Surveys Appendix E. Research Projects IMP Revision Signature Page June 2019 3 | Page Introduction A. Scope and rationale This inventory and monitoring plan (IMP) presents current and expected inventory and monitoring (I&M) activities (surveys) for Keālia Pond NWR (Keālia Pond NWR or Refuge). Most surveys in this IMP are refuge-specific; they evaluate and refine efficacy of resource management actions and measure progress toward achieving resource management objectives identified in refuge planning documents. Some surveys also gather baseline data to develop practical and measurable objectives for restoration projects, or provide baseline data on biological integrity of the Refuge. The IMP also includes cooperative surveys addressing resource issues of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) at larger landscape scales beyond the refuge boundary (e.g., archipelagic) or needs of other agencies and organizations. For cooperative surveys, refuge lands are one of multiple sites including other refuges to address broad-scale resource information needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Kauaʻi Update 2016
    Community Wildfire Protection Plan Kauaʻi Update 2016 KAUAʻI COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2016 UPDATE DEVELOPED BY HAWAIʻI WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION © 2016 IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: KAUAʻI FIRE DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES- DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE; AND KAUAʻI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Developed and Coordinated by: Hawaiʻi Wildfire Management Organization (HWMO), a 501 (c)3 nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting communities and natural resources in Hawaiʻi and the Pacific from wildfire. hawaiiwildfire.org Plan written by: Elizabeth Pickett and Pablo Beimler, HWMO. Public Input Process Coordinated and Led by: Elizabeth Pickett and Ilene Grossman, HWMO, with assistance and participation from agency partners and community members. Maps Created by: Orlando Smith, HWMO. Special Thanks to: Chief Robert Westerman, Captain Daryl Date, and Lieutenant Kilipaki Vaughan of the Kauaʻi Fire Department; Patrick Porter of State Division of Forestry and Wildlife; Elton Ushio of the Kauaʻi Emergency Management Agency; and Dr. Clay Trauernicht of the University of Hawaiʻi Cooperative Extension, CTAHR. Completed using funds from: 2014-16 US Forest Service Competitive Western WUI Grant from the Cooperative Fire Program of the U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Region. In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326 W. Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian Birds 1972*
    HAWAIIAN BIRDS 1972* ANDREW J. BERGER More kinds (species and subspecies) of birds have become extinct in Hawaii than on all continents’ of the world combined. These endemic Hawaiian birds have become ex- tinct since 1844l, and most of them have succumbed since the 1890s. Table 1 lists the endemic Hawaiian birds which are presumed to be extinct. Moreover, Hawaiian birds account for nearly one-half of the birds in the U. S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlifes’ Red Book of rare and endangered species. The follow- ing list contains 16 of the rare and endangered Hawaiian birds: Newells’ Manx Shear- water (Puffinus puffinus newel&), Hawaiian Dark-rumped Petrel (Pterodroma phaeo- pygia sandwichensis), Harcourt s’ Storm Petrel (Oceanodroma Castro cryptoleucura), Nene or Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), Koloa or Hawaiian Duck (Anas wyvilliana) , Laysan Duck (Anus laysanensis) , Hawaiian Hawk (Buteo solitarius) , Hawaiian Gallinule (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis) , Hawaiian Coot (Fulica ameri- cana alai), Hawaiian Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus himantopus knudseni), Hawaiian Crow (Corvus tropicus), Large Kauai Thrush (Phaeornis obscurus myadestina), Molo- kai Thrush (Phaeornis o. rutha), Small Kauai Thrush (Phaeornis palmeri), Nihoa Millerbird (Acrocephalus familiaris kingi), and the Kauai 00 (Moho braccetus). TO this list may be added the non-migratory Hawaiian population of the Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax n. hoactli). But, there are even more endangered Hawaiian birds! Because of their special interest to ornithologists,
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122, Box 50088 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 In Reply Refer To: 20 lO-F -0190 Ms. Sharon Thomas MAY 13 2010 Environmental Protection Specialist Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Subject: Formal Endangered Species Section 7 Consultation on the U.S. Department of Energy Federal Loan Guarantee to Kahuku Wind Power, LLC, Oahu, Hawaii Dear Ms. Thomas: This transmits the biological opinion of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on the potential impacts of the Department of Energy's (DOE) proposed issuance of a federal loan guarantee to Kahuku Wind Power, LLC, for the construction and operation of a 30 megawatt (MW) wind power generation facility in Kahuku, Oahu, Hawaii, pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 USC 1531, et seq.). The USFWS received your March 5, 2010, letter requesting initiation of consultation on March 9, 2010, with the attached Kahuku Wind Power Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §195D and the DOE draft Environmental Assessment (DOE/EA-1726) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 USC 4321, et seq.). The proposed project consists of twelve 2.5 MW wind turbine generators (WTGs), an operations and maintenance building, one permanent unguyed meteorological (met) tower, one on-site and two off-site microwave towers, an electrical substation, Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), re-configuration of overhead transmission lines, an underground collection system, and a network of unpaved service roadways.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Scanned Documents
    26? ArcAhvj qf Mwwnd Hbfofy (1996) 23 (1): 1-42 The contribution of the voyage of H.M.S. Blonde (1825) to Hawaiian ornithology By STORRS L. OLSON Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, ua.A. The voyage of H.M.S. Mm* (1825) was the Ant after Cook': thnd voyage (1778-79) to bring back significant new knowledge of the ornithology of the Hawaiian Islands. Twenty-five existing Hawaiian specimens of birds from the voyage are traced and discussed, along with previously unpublished natural history notes by the expedition's naturalist, Andrew Bloxam. The B/om/f expedition is the only one known to have obtained a thrush (f Aoeon:ij=AfyadMff.i) on Oahu, and two specimens probably of Oahu origin, including the type of Tlwdw; wooAenju Bloxam, are identined. The name /Vecforina ./&n%i Bloxam (1827) is shown to have priority over ffimonomg cWork Cabanis (1850) for the Oahu Amakihi. INTRODUCTION After the European discovery of the Hawaiian archipelago in 1778-79, on James Cook's Anal voyage, which brought back numerous specimens of birds (Medway, 1981), the next expedition to the islands to make a significant contribution to ornithology was that of H.M.S. ZMonde, in 1825. The ornithological results of this voyage were very poorly documented, however. Although the literature does not well reflect the fact, most of the specimens of Hawaiian birds known to have been preserved on the voyage of the Blonde still exist, along with considerable unpublished natural history information compiled by the expedition's naturalist, Andrew Bloxam.
    [Show full text]
  • Focal Species: Hawaiian Water Birds: • Hawaiian Coot Or 'Alae
    Hawaiian Bird Conservation Action Plan Focal Species: Hawaiian Water birds: Hawaiian Coot or ‘Alae ke‘oke‘o (Fulica alai) Hawaiian Gallinule or ‘Alae ‘Ula (Gallinula galeata sandvicensis) Hawaiian Stilt or Ae‘o (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni) Synopsis: These three waterbirds use a variety of wetlands, but habitat loss and degradation have reduced their range and abundance. The Hawaiian Coot is considered a full species, while the gallinule and stilt are subspecies of North American taxa. The coot and stilt are widespread and relatively numerous, but the more secretive gallinule is found on only two islands and is thought to have a smaller population. Habitat protection and management are keys to recovery of these species. They nest on the ground or in low wetland vegetation, where they are vulnerable to non-native predators, so predator control also is important to increase reproduction. Hawaiian Coot, Gallinule, and Stilt (left to right). Photos Eric VanderWerf Geographic region: Hawaiian Islands Group: Water birds Federal Status: Endangered (coot, gallinule, and stilt) State status: Endangered (coot, gallinule, and stilt) IUCN status: Vulnerable (coot only, gallinule and stilt NA) PIF/ABC score, rank: 17/20, 18/20, 18/20, At-risk Watch List 2007 Score: Red (coot, gallinule, and stilt) Climate Change Score: Moderate (coot, gallinule, and stilt) Status: The Hawaiian Coot, Hawaiian Gallinule, and Hawaiian Stilt are all listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) and by the state of Hawaii. The Hawaiian Coot is considered vulnerable by the IUCN. The Hawaiian Gallinule and Hawaiian Stilt are subspecies of the Common Gallinule and Black-necked Stilt of North America, respectively, and thus are not specifically considered by the IUCN.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement and Sexual Dimorphism of the Endangered Hawaiian Coot, (Fulica Alai), on Oahu a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Divisi
    MOVEMENT AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM OF THE ENDANGERED HAWAIIAN COOT, (FULICA ALAI), ON OAHU A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ZOOLOGY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) DECEMBER 2016 By Randi A. Riggs Thesis Committee: Robert Cowie, Chairperson Andrew Taylor Robert Thomson Keywords: Rallidae, waterbird, conservation, collar, mark-resight, Program MARK, sex ratio, morphometrics, shield size, Hawaii ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am immensely grateful to my advisor, Robert Cowie for his mentorship, and especially for his advice and help improving this manuscript. I want to also extend my sincere thanks to my committee members for their support, especially Andrew Taylor for assistance with data analysis and Robert Thomson for helpful comments on the manuscript. Special thanks expressly to Eric Vanderwerf for assistance with Program MARK. I am grateful to Michael Silbernagle, Jared Underwood, Aaron Nadig and Dave Ellis of the USFWS and Jason Misaki, Katie Doyle and James Cogswell of DOFAW, Hugo Devries and Cindy Turner (owners of Kaelepulu wetland) for access to field sites and for assistance with field work. I thank Kira Krend, Thomas Smith, Sam Bader, Karen Wattam, Jess Mattingly-Faith, Cherish Frates and all volunteers for assistance with field work; Arleonne Dibben-Young, Kira Krend, and Anna Gabela for training, and David Duffy for assistance with obtaining permits. I also appreciate Michael Silbernagle for his advice about the research project in its early stages of development. I am grateful to Arleonne Dibben- Young, Al Silva, Hob Osterlund, Kurt Pohlman, Pete Donaldson, Marie McKenzie, Kim Uyehara, Mike Ord, Lance Tanino, the Hawaii Audubon Society and the Hawaii birding community for valuable resight reports.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Analysis of the Endemic Avifauna of the Hawaiian Islands. Harold Douglas Pratt Rj Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1979 A Systematic Analysis of the Endemic Avifauna of the Hawaiian Islands. Harold Douglas Pratt rJ Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Pratt, Harold Douglas Jr, "A Systematic Analysis of the Endemic Avifauna of the Hawaiian Islands." (1979). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3347. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3347 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the Him inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • American Coot and Black-Necked Stilt on the Island of Hawaii
    AMERICAN COOT AND BLACK-NECKED STILT ON THE ISLAND OF HAWAII PETER W.C. PATON, Redwood ScienceLab, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, Califor- nia 95521 J. MICHAEL SCOTT, Condor Research Center, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2291-A PortolaRd., Ventura, California93003 (presentaddress: Idaho Cooperative Fisheriesand WildlifeUnit, Collegeof Forestry,Range, and WildlifeScience, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843) TIMOTHY A. BURR, Hawaii Dept. of Land and Natural Resources,Division of Forestry and Wildlife, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 (present address: PACNAV- FACENGCO, Code 24-B, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860) Ornithologistsstudying the wetlandavifauna of the islandof Hawaiiduring the late 1800s reportedtwo endemic species(Hawaiian Rail Porzanasand- wichensisand Hawaiian Duck Anas wyvilliana),three endemic subspecies (American[Hawaiian] Coot Fulicaamericana alai, Black-necked[Hawaiian] Stilt Himantopus mexicanusknudseni, and Common [Hawaiian] Moorhen Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis),and one indigenous species (Black- crowned Night-Heron Nycticorax nycticorax hoactli) (Wilson and Evans 1890-1899, Rothschild1893-1900, Henshaw 1902, Perkins1903). The rail is now extinct. The moorhen, althoughpresent on other islands,has been extirpated from Hawaii. The coot, moorhen and duck are classifiedas en- dangered by the State of Hawaii and the Federal government (USFWS 1983). One otherendangered endemic water bird, the stilt,was apparently absentfrom the islandfrom 1896 to as recentlyas the early 1960s (Walker 1962, Banko 1979, Patonand Scott 1985). Researchis currentlybeing con- ducted on the Hawaiian Duck by the Hawaiian Divisionof Forestryand Wildlife (HDFW), as informationon this speciesis limited(Jon Giffin pets. comm.). Surveysof the wetlandsof Hawaii conductedover the past20 years by the HDFW have providedbaseline data on the populationtrends of the coot and stilt (unpubl. data on file, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Honolulu, Hawaii Avian History Report 1 Winston E. Banko Hawaii
    COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA Department of Botany Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (808) 948- 8218 Clifford W. Smith, Director Associate Professor of Botany Avian History Report 1 HISTORY OF ENDEMIC HAWAIIAN BIRDS INTRODUCTION Winston E. Banko Research Associate Hawaii Field Research Center Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Hawaii 96718 March 1979 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contract No. CX 8000 8 Contribution i ABSTRACT The history of endemic Hawaiian birds is developed in three ma j or parts. Narrative accounts of 69 taxa, based on records since 1778, are detailed in Part I. Major ecological factors of population changes, such as depletion of food by foreign organisms, predation, disease, and habitat alteration, are treated in Part Chronological, geographical, and ecological elements of avian depopulation are synthesized and offered with conclusions in Part 111. The Introduction states the objectives, lists the endemic avifauna, defines the historical scope, and outlines the complete work. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.. ........................ i LIST OF TABLES. ...................... ii INTRODUCTION. ....................... ENDEMIC HAWAIIAN AVIFAUNA ................. 2 HISTORICAL SCOPE. ..................... 10 OUTLINE OF COMPLETE WORK. ................. 10 HISTORY OF ENDEMIC HAWAIIAN BIRDS ............. 11 LITERATURE CITED. ..................... 13 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Endemic Hawaiian avifauna grouped according to characteristic environment ........... 4 'I 2 ENDEMIC HAWAIIAN AVIFAUNA The term " endemic" is used i n this report to include only scientifically described species and subspecies known t o have existed exclusively in the Hawaiian Islands during the historic period (since 1778). Such a definition eliminates all migratory and introduced birds and all but two species of sea birds leaving, according to the authorities consulted, the 69 taxa listed in Table 1.
    [Show full text]