DOCSLIB.ORG

Chondrodysplasia in Bouviers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chondrodysplasia in Bouviers Chondrodysplasia in Bouviers Radiographic findings in Bouviers with a radius curvus syndrome Drs. T. Oudenes Project Tutors: Dr. E. Auriemma Prof. Dr. G. Voorhout Abstract Bouviers are a popular breed of dog in Holland. Since some time the breed association has noticed that in different litters pups were born with deformed forelimbs. The abnormalities seen in different degrees in the young Bouviers include: outwardly turned feet, inwardly turned elbows and short legs, some of the dogs show symptoms of lameness. The defect appears to be hereditary and seems to fit into the syndrome of chondrodysplasia. Lameness in the front limbs is a common complaint for owners to seek out veterinary help. The causes can be categorized into congenital anomalies, developmental disorders, traumatic, idiopathic, infectious, nutritional, metabolic and neoplastic disorders. The first two are more common and can have a genetic basis. 28 Bouviers, both with and without the skeletal anomaly, have been clinically and radiographically examined. The age ranged from 6 weeks to 11 years. The most prominent abnormalities found, include (sub)luxation of the radial head and bowing of the proximal radius in a caudolateral direction, bowing of the ulna, a shallow trochlear notch, a widened olecranon fossa and (sub)luxation of the ulna at the level of the carpus and valgus deviation of the front paws. The abnormalities show a lot of similarity with CEL type 1 as reported by Kene et al (1982). 2 Table of Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 Normal anatomy and development of the forelimb 3 Disorders of the forelimb in the growing dog 7 Asynchronous growth of the radius and ulna 7 Retained cartilaginous cone 9 Congenital elbow luxation 9 Materials and methods 11 Results 12 Discussion & conclusion 17 References 21 3 Introduction Bouviers are a popular breed of dog in Holland. Not many hereditary disorders circle in this population. Since some time however dog owners have noticed that in different litters pups were born with deformed forelimbs. The number of litters with pups showing this defect appears to have grown. For that reason the breed association (Nederlandse Bouvier Club) contacted the faculty of veterinary medicine in Utrecht. The faculty set up a couple of dates at which a number of Bouviers (both healthy and with the defect) were clinically and radiographically examined. The abnormalities seen in different degrees in the young Bouviers include: outwardly turned feet, inwardly turned elbows and short legs (Hazewinkel 2008), see figure 1. Some of the dogs have problems in the elbow joint, causing them to show symptoms of lameness (Hazewinkel 2008). The defect appears to be hereditary and seems to fit into the syndrome of chondrodysplasia, a congenital lessening of cartilaginous growth (Hazewinkel 2008). Lameness of the forelimb is a frequently seen problem Figure 1 – Bouvier with abnormal front limbs in dogs under 1 year of age. Many causes are known (Cook 2001). The causes can be categorized into congenital anomalies, developmental disorders, traumatic, idiopathic, infectious, nutritional, metabolic and neoplastic disorders (Cook 2001). The first two can have a genetic basis and could be the cause of the lameness in the Bouviers. Infectious, nutritional, metabolic and neoplastic causes are infrequently seen (Cook 2001). Much research has been dedicated to deformities of the limbs in dogs and a lot of articles have been published on the topic. The syndrome seen in the Bouviers does not seem to fit the most commonly described anomalies. There also seems little known about the defect in the Bouviers; no specific literature is available on growth disorders in the forelimb of Bouviers. The goal of this article is to describe and inventory the abnormalities seen on the radiographs of the front legs of the Bouviers and to find clues for an etiology (and thus pointing out areas for further research). I will start by describing the normal development and anatomy of the forelimb. After that I will recount what is written in the literature on growth disorders that could fit the abnormalities seen in the Bouviers. Next I will describe the defects seen on the radiographs, followed by a discussion of similarities and differences with the literature and the possible etiologic factors. Normal anatomy and development of the forelimb The forelimb is built up of the brachium, antebrachium, carpus and manus. The brachium or upper arm consists of the humerus. At the proximal end of the humerus there is a round caput that contacts the glenoidal cavity of the scapula (Dyce 2002). The tuberculum major and minus, separated by the intertubercular groove, border the caput (Dyce 2002). A spiral groove runs over the lateral side of the shaft (Dyce 2002). At the lateral side of the shaft the deltoid tuberositas is located and connected to the tuberculum major through a prominent ridge (Dyce 4 2002). On the medial side of the shaft the tuberositas teres major is located (Dyce 2002). The distal end of the humerus consists of an articular condyle, divided in a medial area (trochlea) for the ulna and a lateral area (capitulum) for the radius (Dyce 2002). The caudal part of the trochlear groove is continued proximally in a deep fossa olecranon, that offers space for the anconeal process of the ulna (Dyce 2002). Proximal of the articular part are a medial and a lateral epicondyle (Dyce 2002). The foramen supratrochlearis perforates the bottom of the fossa olecranon an opens in the hollow fossa radialis in the cranial part of the shaft (Dyce 2002). The antebrachium or lower arm is formed from two bones: radius and ulna. In the standing animal the ulna is caudal from the radius in the proximal part of the antebrachium, but lateral in the distal part (Dyce 2002). The radius and ulna only make contact at the ends, making pronation and supination (up to 45°) possible (Dyce 2002). The radius is shaped like a rod, widening at the proximal end, where it articulates with the humerus, and at the caudal side with the ulna (Dyce 2002). The shaft is cranio-caudally compressed and slightly bowed in length (Dyce 2002). The distal end is somewhat enlarged and has a slight concave oval form, allowing for abduction, adduction and rotation in the carpus (Dyce 2002). Medial to the carpal joint the radius is lengthened and forms the medial styloid process (Dyce 2002). The ulna has a small shaft and is lengthened proximal to the elbow by the olecranon process (Dyce 2002). Distal to the olecranon on the cranial border is the anconeal process and further distally there is a facet for articulation with the radius (Dyce 2002). The shaft is equal in length to the radius and both bones are separated by a membrane crossing the interosseus space (Dyce 2002). The distal end has a facet for articulation and ends in the lateral styloid process (Dyce 2002). The short carpal bones are located in two rows. The proximal row contains the radial, ulnar and accessory bone (Dyce 2002). The accessory bone extends caudal from the carpus (Dyce 2002). The distal row is numbered 1 through 4 (Dyce 2002). On the medial side of the carpus is a small sesamoid bone (Dyce 2002). Most movements in the carpus occur at the level of the antebrachiocarpal joint, some in the intracarpal articulation and almost none in the carpometacarpal articulation (Dyce 2002). The first signs of the developing limbs are paired projections growing from the ventrolateral surface of the embryo. In dogs these can be seen from the fourth week of gestation (McGeady 2006). The growing extremity consists of a mesenchymal core and an outer layer of ectoderm (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). The first indication of the skeleton consists of a thickening of the central mesoderm forming a core in the limb bud, that later develops into a series of cartilage models shaped like the future mature bones (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006, Bingel 1977). In the next stage the cartilage is replaced by bone tissue. The ossification in a typical long bone takes place through two processes (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). The first process is intramembranous ossification. The perichondrium around the middle of the shaft lays bone on the cartilage within a connective tissue membrane, this causes a tubular bone layer (a collar) to form around the centre of the shaft, that slowly expands to the ends (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). With the second process the cartilage in the centre of the shaft degenerates and the matrix is impregnated with calcium salts (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). Next connective tissue from the periosteum grows into the isle of dead cartilage, bringing with it several cell types with different functions responsible for the process of endochondral ossification (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). The balanced construction and destruction change the middle of the shaft into the primary or diaphysary centre of ossification (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). Later similar centres of ossifications are formed at the two extremities of the cartilage model: secondary or epiphysary centres of ossification (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). Bone growth is more complex then described above. The required size and shape can only be 5 obtained by remodelling the bone, a combination of bone deposition and resorption (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). Eventually only two plates of the original cartilage remain: the epiphisiary or growth plates, situated between the primary and secondary centres of ossification. (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006). Interstitial growth of the cartilage in these growth plates ensures the lengthening of the bone, as long as the growth speed equals the speed of endochondral ossification (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006, Hazewinkel 1998). With the aging of the animal the replacement of cartilage by bone goes faster than the cartilaginous growth, causing the plate to thin and eventually disappear (Dyce 2002, McGeady 2006).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Original Article Pictorial Atlas of Symptomatic Accessory Ossicles by 18F-Sodium Fluoride (Naf) PET-CT
    Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;7(6):275-282 www.ajnmmi.us /ISSN:2160-8407/ajnmmi0069278 Original Article Pictorial atlas of symptomatic accessory ossicles by 18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET-CT Sharjeel Usmani1, Cherry Sit2, Gopinath Gnanasegaran2, Tim Van den Wyngaert3, Fahad Marafi4 1Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET/CT Imaging, Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Khaitan, Kuwait; 2Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; 3Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; 4Jaber Al-Ahmad Molecular Imaging Center, Kuwait Received August 7, 2017; Accepted December 15, 2017; Epub December 20, 2017; Published December 30, 2017 Abstract: Accessory ossicles are developmental variants which are often asymptomatic. When incidentally picked up on imaging, they are often inconsequential and rarely a cause for concern. However, they may cause pain or discomfort due to trauma, altered stress, and over-activity. Nuclear scintigraphy may play a role in the diagnosis and localizing pain generators. 18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) is a PET imaging agent used in bone imaging. Although commonly used in imaging patients with cancer imaging malignancy, 18F-NaF may be useful in the evaluation of benign bone and joint conditions. In this article, we would like to present a spectrum of clinical cases and review the potential diagnostic utility of 18F-NaF in the assessment of symptomatic accessory ossicles in patients referred for staging cancers. Keywords: 18F-NaF PET/CT, accessory ossicles, hybrid imaging Introduction Accessory ossicles are developmental variants which are often asymptomatic. When inciden- Bone and joint pain is a common presentation tally picked up on imaging, they are often incon- in both primary and secondary practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skeletal System
    Essentials of Human Anatomy & Physiology Seventh Edition Foundation • Physical Foundation of the Body The Skeletal System – 206 Bones • Osteology – science of the anatomy, structure, and function of bones – “Os” means Bone • With the exception of teeth, bone IS the hardest substance in the body Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings The Skeletal System • Parts of the skeletal system • Bones (skeleton) • Joints • Cartilages • Ligaments (bone to bone)(tendon=bone to muscle) • Divided into two divisions • Axial skeleton • Copyright © 2003Appendicular Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjaminskeleton Cummings – limbs and girdle 1 Functions of Bones Bones of the Human Body • The skeleton has 206 bones • Support of the body • Two basic types of bone tissue • Protection of soft organs • Compact bone • Movement due to attached skeletal • Homogeneous muscles • Spongy bone • Storage of minerals and fats (K, Mg, • Small needle-like pieces of bone Na) Figure 5.2b • Many open spaces • Blood cell formation (White and Red) Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Classification of Bones Classification of Bones • Long bones • Short bones • Typically longer than wide • Generally cube-shape • Have a shaft with heads at both ends • Contain mostly spongy bone • Contain mostly compact bone •Examples: Carpals, tarsals • Examples: Femur, humerus Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings 2 Classification of Bones on the Classification of Bones Basis of Shape • Flat bones • Thin and flattened • Usually curved • Thin layers of compact bone around a layer of spongy bone •Examples: Skull, ribs, sternum Figure 5.1 Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Unusual Cases of Congenital Forelimb Malformations in Dogs
    animals Article Four Unusual Cases of Congenital Forelimb Malformations in Dogs Simona Di Pietro 1 , Giuseppe Santi Rapisarda 2, Luca Cicero 3,* , Vito Angileri 4, Simona Morabito 5, Giovanni Cassata 3 and Francesco Macrì 1 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (S.D.P.); [email protected] (F.M.) 2 Department of Veterinary Prevention, Provincial Health Authority of Catania, 95030 Gravina di Catania, Italy; [email protected] 3 Institute Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Sicily, Via G. Marinuzzi, 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 4 Veterinary Practitioner, 91025 Marsala, Italy; [email protected] 5 Ospedale Veterinario I Portoni Rossi, Via Roma, 57/a, 40069 Zola Predosa (BO), Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Congenital limb defects are sporadically encountered in dogs during normal clinical practice. Literature concerning their diagnosis and management in canine species is poor. Sometimes, the diagnosis and description of congenital limb abnormalities are complicated by the concurrent presence of different malformations in the same limb and the lack of widely accepted classification schemes. In order to improve the knowledge about congenital limb anomalies in dogs, this report describes the clinical and radiographic findings in four dogs affected by unusual congenital forelimb defects, underlying also the importance of reviewing current terminology. Citation: Di Pietro, S.; Rapisarda, G.S.; Cicero, L.; Angileri, V.; Morabito, Abstract: Four dogs were presented with thoracic limb deformity. After clinical and radiographic S.; Cassata, G.; Macrì, F. Four Unusual examinations, a diagnosis of congenital malformations was performed for each of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Christy Crystal Creek"
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2004 Missoula County Sheriff's Department case #8509102: A comprehensive forensic case report for "Christy Crystal Creek" Sydney Wimbrow The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Wimbrow, Sydney, "Missoula County Sheriff's Department case #8509102: A comprehensive forensic case report for "Christy Crystal Creek"" (2004). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5884. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5884 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ♦♦Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission y No, I do not grant permission_____ Author's Signature: Z) Date:_____________________________ Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with
    [Show full text]
  • Fractures of the Carpal Bones Excluding the Scaphoid
    FRACTURES OF THE CARPAL BONES EXCLUDING THE SCAPHOID BY MUNIR A. SHAH, MD, AND STEVEN F. VIEGAS, MD Carpal fractures excluding the scaphoid can cause morbidity that is dispropor- tionate to their incidence because they are easily overlooked and are often harbingers of a wider wrist injury. Failure to recognize a more global injury pattern can result in undertreatment and permanent wrist dysfunction. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion,familiarity with carpal topography to guide the physical examination,and judicious use of specialized radiographic views and ancillary imaging techniques. Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand racture of the carpal bones, excluding the topography to guide the physical examination and scaphoid, account for approximately 40% of judicious use of specialized radiographic views and Fall carpal fractures.1 Paradigms for evaluation ancillary imaging techniques based on clinical sus- and treatment of the fractured scaphoid are well picion. Second, such fractures are often harbingers delineated in the literature. The less common frac- of significant ligamentous disruption or associated tures of other carpal bones have received consider- carpal fractures. Failure to recognize a more global ably less attention. However, these injuries can injury pattern can result in undertreatment and produce morbidity that is disproportionate to their permanent wrist dysfunction. incidence for several reasons. First, carpal fractures We examine the incidence, mechanisms of injury, excluding the scaphoid may have a subtle clinical associated osseous and ligamentous injuries, physical and radiographic presentation and are easily over- examination findings, useful radiographic views, and looked. Diagnosis requires familiarity with carpal ancillary imaging techniques and management prin- ciples of these often overlooked carpal fractures.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Foot Pain Due to Os Vesalianum Pedis in a Young Football Player; a Case Report and Review of the Current Literature
    Skeletal Radiology (2019) 48:1821–1828 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03190-4 CASE REPORT Lateral foot pain due to os vesalianum pedis in a young football player; a case report and review of the current literature Faruk Aykanat1 & Cornelis Vincenten2 & Mehmet Cenk Cankus1 & Ozkan Kose3,4 & Muzaffer Sindel5 Received: 11 January 2019 /Revised: 5 February 2019 /Accepted: 14 February 2019 /Published online: 27 February 2019 # ISS 2019 Abstract Os vesalianum pedis is a rare accessory ossicle located at the 5th metatarsal base. This anatomic variation is typically asymp- tomatic and usually detected incidentally on routine foot radiographs. However, it may be a source of lateral foot pain and rarely become symptomatic following traumatic ankle injuries such as an inversion ankle sprain. To date, seven symptomatic os vesalianum pedis cases that required surgical treatment have been reported in the current literature. Herein, a 17-year-old professional football player with a symptomatic os vesalianum pedis was presented. The ossicle was surgically removed upon failure of conservative treatment. At the sixth month, the patient returned to sport without any restriction or pain. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options of symptomatic os vesalianum pedis were discussed with an extensive literature review. Keywords Accessory ossicle . Foot . Os vesalianum pedis . Anatomic variation . Metatarsal apophysis Introduction relatively rare accessory ossicle compared to commonly seen ossicles such as os trigonum and an accessory navicular bone. Numerous skeletal variations such as accessory ossicles, bipar- The incidence of OVP is reported to be between 0.1 and 5.9% in titions, and coalitions can be observed around the foot and ankle.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Accessory Bones of the Foot in Turkish Patients
    Original Investigation 147 Prevalence of Accessory Bones of the Foot in Turkish Patients Esat Uygur1, Birol Aktaş2, Tayyar Taylan Öz2, Samet Erinç2, Murat Koç3 1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Emsey Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey 2Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, İstanbul Medeniyet University Göztepe Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey 3Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and distribution of accessory bones of the foot by age and gender in a Turkish patient group. Methods: Dorsoplantar and lateral foot radiographs acquired from the data related to outpatient clinics patients in 2014 were retrospectively examined for the presence of accessory bones. The computed radiography images were evaluated via a picture archiving and communication system. A total of 8204 radiographs were assessed and 6779 radiographs were found to be eligible for inclusion in the study. Results: 47.4% of the radiographs were from males and 52.5% females. The prevalence of accessory bones in the whole study group was found to be 18.1%. Gender analysis showed that 17.5% of the female radiographs and 16.4% of the male radiographs had accessory bones. Among all the accessory bones found in the study group, os tibiale externum was found to be the most common accessory bone (32.1%). Conclusion: In the present study, no significant difference was detected in terms of gender. Os tibiale externum was found to be the most common accessory bone of the foot. Os peroneum and os trigonum were found to be the second and third most common, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessory Navicular Syndrome
    Accessory Navicular Syndrome What is the Accessory Navicular? The accessory navicular (os navicularum or os tibiale externum) is an extra bone or piece of cartilage located on the inner side of the foot just above the arch. It is incorporated within the posterior tibial tendon, which attaches in this area. An accessory navicular is congenital (present at birth). It is not part of normal bone structure and therefore is not present in most people. What is Accessory Navicular Syndrome? People who have an accessory navicular often are unaware of the condition if it causes no problems. However, some people with this extra bone develop a painful condition known as accessory navicular syndrome when the bone and/or posterior tibial tendon are aggravated. This can result from any of the following: Trauma, as in a foot or ankle sprain Chronic irritation from shoes or other footwear rubbing against the extra bone Excessive activity or overuse Many people with accessory navicular syndrome also have flat feet (fallen arches). Having a flat foot puts more strain on the posterior tibial tendon, which can produce inflammation or irritation of the accessory navicular. Signs and Symptoms of Accessory Navicular Syndrome Adolescence is a common time for the symptoms to first appear. This is a time when bones are maturing and cartilage is developing into bone. Sometimes, however, the symptoms do not occur until adulthood. The signs and symptoms of accessory navicular syndrome include: A visible bony prominence on the midfoot (the inner side of the foot, just above the arch) Redness and swelling of the bony prominence Vague pain or throbbing in the midfoot and arch, usually occurring during or after periods of activity Diagnosis To diagnose accessory navicular syndrome, the foot and ankle surgeon will ask about symptoms and examine the foot, looking for skin irritation or swelling.
    [Show full text]
  • FIPAT-TA2-Part-2.Pdf
    TERMINOLOGIA ANATOMICA Second Edition (2.06) International Anatomical Terminology FIPAT The Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology A programme of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) TA2, PART II Contents: Systemata musculoskeletalia Musculoskeletal systems Caput II: Ossa Chapter 2: Bones Caput III: Juncturae Chapter 3: Joints Caput IV: Systema musculare Chapter 4: Muscular system Bibliographic Reference Citation: FIPAT. Terminologia Anatomica. 2nd ed. FIPAT.library.dal.ca. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology, 2019 Published pending approval by the General Assembly at the next Congress of IFAA (2019) Creative Commons License: The publication of Terminologia Anatomica is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license The individual terms in this terminology are within the public domain. Statements about terms being part of this international standard terminology should use the above bibliographic reference to cite this terminology. The unaltered PDF files of this terminology may be freely copied and distributed by users. IFAA member societies are authorized to publish translations of this terminology. Authors of other works that might be considered derivative should write to the Chair of FIPAT for permission to publish a derivative work. Caput II: OSSA Chapter 2: BONES Latin term Latin synonym UK English US English English synonym Other 351 Systemata Musculoskeletal Musculoskeletal musculoskeletalia systems systems
    [Show full text]
  • Congenital Parotid Ectopia in Accessory Maxilla and Facial Cleft Anomalies
    International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 77 (2013) 608–612 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijporl Case report Congenital parotid ectopia in accessory maxilla and facial cleft anomalies: Three cases report a b, b Lisha Sun , Zhipeng Sun *, Xuchen Ma a Key Laboratory of Oral Pathology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China b Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: To further document the clinical features of accessory maxilla with three additional cases report. Clinical Received 23 October 2012 and radiological features of three cases of accessory maxilla were presented. Related literature was Received in revised form 28 December 2012 summarized for comparison. Ectopic parotid gland, facial cleft and accessory maxilla are three Accepted 30 December 2012 concomitant malformations in this condition. The tooth-bearing accessory maxillary duplication derives Available online 24 January 2013 from the abnormal growth of the zygoma or zygomatic arch. Facial cleft, parotid ectopia and tooth- bearing accessory maxilla may constitute a rare congenital syndrome. Keywords: ß 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Congenital Tooth Maxilla Zygoma Parotid gland 1. Introduction 2.1. Case 1 The terms of ‘‘maxillary duplication’’ and ‘‘accessory maxilla’’ A 13-year-old boy with facial deformity was referred to our have been used to describe an extremely rare clinical entity hospital. The patient was discovered with bilateral lateral facial characterized by redundant tooth-bearing bony segment posterior clefts and cleft palate at birth.
    [Show full text]
  • I1/Keiicanjilseum
    I1/keiicanJIlseum PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 1729 MAY 11, 1955 The Jaw Musculature in Protoceratops and in Other Ceratopsians BY GEORG HAAs' INTRODUCTION It is certainly almost impossible to get an unequivocal and precise idea of the muscular topography in an extinct vertebrate the systematic posi- tion of which precludes a close analogy with a recent relative. Neverthe- less, many attempts to reconstruct parts or the whole of the muscular system of extinct vertebrates have been made. A complete skeleton tells only half of the possible function of the locomotor apparatus. I think that every worker on vertebrate muscles should try to get an idea of the possible location of the muscles in fossil animals, especially if the material is rich and complete enough, and if the animal in question has more or less related recent relatives which may be used for comparison. After having seen the rich collection of ceratopsian skulls in the American Museum of Natural History, the author asked the help of Dr. E. H. Colbert, who kindly gave him every assistance in order to study the primitive ceratopsian Protoceratops andrewsi. Exceptionally well-pre- served and ample material promised to lead to a closer understanding than had previously been possible of an early representative of a group that subsequently became very diversified. The attention of the author was especially attracted to this group because he is of the opinion that almost every reconstruction (of which there are a large number) of ceratopsids seemed to be conditioned by the notion that these reptiles must resemble in some way the rhinoceroses, especially because the animals of both groups are herbivorous, rather heavily built, and have horns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symptomatic Accessory Navicular Bone
    The Symptomatic Accessory Navicular Bone Gregory Strayhorn, MD, MPH, and James Puhl, MD Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and Iowa City, Iowa The accessory navicular bone may serve as a nidus for in­ flammation and irritation of the medial aspect of the foot. When symptoms occur, the presence of the bone is frequently misdiagnosed as a fracture of the navicular bone. Conservative treatment of the symptoms associated with the accessory na­ vicular bone may not permanently resolve the inflammation and discomfort. When conservative therapy is ineffective, ex­ cision of the accessory navicular bone is the treatment of choice to alleviate pain and disability. It has been reported that 10 to 14 percent of rather than as affecting the normal mechanics of normal feet have an accessory navicular bone.1 the foot.2,5 Other reports have estimated a 5 percent preva­ lence in the general population.2 The accessory navicular bone has been implicated in the produc­ Anatomy tion of a weak, painful foot.3 It was once thought The accessory navicular bone is located poste­ that the bone interfered with the normal mechan­ rior medially behind the tuberosity of the navicular ics of the foot because its relationship to the pos­ bone and is found unilaterally or bilaterally. The terior tibialis tendon then led to the development accessory navicular bone may be independent of of the flat foot.4 More recent studies have refuted the navicular bone, form a fibrocartilaginous union, the theory that the accessory navicular bone inter­ or form a natural bony union with the navicular feres with the mechanics of the foot; they suggest bone.
    [Show full text]