DOCSLIB.ORG

Comments on Ehdc Local Plan for Large Scale Developments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comments on Ehdc Local Plan for Large Scale Developments 11/12/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook COMMENTS ON EHDC LOCAL PLAN FOR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS Mon 14/10/2019 12:23 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> 2 attachments (420 KB) COMMENTS ON EHDC LOCAL PLAN FOR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS_131019 .pdf; COMMENTS ON EHDC LOCAL PLAN FOR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS_111019.pdf; Dear Sir/Madam, Please find aached 2 copies of comment from my wife and I in respect of your public consultaon exercise on the dra Local Plan for large scale developments. Please would you kindly acknowledge safe receipt so that we know our comments have arrived at the correct EHDC Planning Department ? Yours sincerely, https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/1 > Planning Policy EHDC Penns Place Petersfield GU31 4EX 12 October 2019 Dear Sir/Madam, COMMENTS ON EHDC LOCAL PLAN FOR LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENTS You have requested comments on proposals for large scale developments in the east Hampshire area as part of a ‘Local Plan’ for large scale development. Currently you have proposed 2 sites in a draft plan issued earlier this year and now you are asking for public comments on these and a further 8 sites as part of a general consultation. The sites are as follows: 10 sites in total are being considered. 5 of which are local lying within Four Marks (including Chawton Park Farm), Medstead and Ropley. 3 further sites outside our area have been nominated at Horndean, Liphook and Neatham Down. 2 sites have been selected in the current EHDC draft Local Plan at Northbrook Park, Bentley and Whitehill & Borden. GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE 5 LOCAL SITES (Four Marks (including Chawton Park Farm), Medstead and Ropley): Four Marks have already exceeded the agreed target of 175 new build dwellings in the period 2013 to 2028 by more than 3 times with very few improvements to infrastructure and local services to match this rapid growth. The sewage system in particular would require a massive investment to increase capacity all the way to the Alton treatment station. At peak times all our road junctions (more than 20) with the A31 are over capacity resulting in frustration and risk taking in order to join the main A31 flow. There is very little local employment leading to increased commuting traffic with the majority heading east towards London. Local schools are already full to capacity and not conveniently located for the proposed sites. We already have unacceptable long waits for Doctors’ appointments and this proposal will increase the delay still further. All of the proposed sites abut existing housing and will cause untold construction misery. Since all of the proposed sites are green field and rich in wildlife, including protected species such as bats and dormice, further development will cause serious disruption, on top of that already inflicted since 2013. SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON THE 5 LOCAL SITES: Chawton Park Farm has already seen an increase in its wildlife due to the Treloars development of 280 dwellings. The loss of trees will be an ecological disaster along with the loss of recreational amenity for local residents. There is a single lane railway bridge in the A31 direction which will create a bottleneck for such a large housing estate. 1 The Four Marks South site proposal is a wildlife corridor connecting the South Downs National Park to the wider countryside between Ropley & Four Marks via Old Down Wood etc. The proposed site is made up of multiple owners who will employ multiple developers making this proposal unworkable. The proposed new school location is poorly located on the edge of the village at the extreme eastern end and furthest from the centre at Oak Green. It also means yet more green field land will be destroyed and unable to be used for agriculture. Land west of Lymington Bottom Road, South Medstead which is located on rising ground will increase the risk of flooding. One of the areas put forward is common to the South Medstead proposal and there is a single lane restricted railway bridge connecting to the main A31 which is already creating traffic bottlenecks at peak times. South Medstead is a site with multiple owners and associated developers making it unsustainable and with one area common to the above proposal for land west of Lymington Bottom Road, South Medstead. Also common is the single lane restricted railway bridge connecting to the main A31 which is already creating traffic bottlenecks at peak times. Land south of Winchester Road, Four Marks is prime agricultural land which will be lost to farm/food production as well as wildlife access/corridors via boundary hedgerows and field edges. Another area of prime green countryside will be lost to wildlife alongside the heritage railway. This site is a long way from the village centre and will create maximum traffic disruption at peak times going towards London. Such a development will considerably disrupt long distance views from the west and southwest including that from the South Downs National Park and the heritage railway. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above I object most strongly to the 5 site proposals around Four Marks as being totally unacceptable and unsustainable in an area which is already overdeveloped with roads struggling to cope during peak traffic periods and with an infrastructure deficit. Whilst I remain unhappy about any large scale developments in this area the 2 sites already chosen by EHDC in their draft Local Plan, Northbrook Park and Whitehill and Bordon, would in my opinion be the lesser evil. Northbrook Park, which is already part industrialised, would become a self contained village and would not interfere with any other settlement, with good road and nearby rail connections. Whitehill and Bordon is an extension of an existing large development with roads and infrastructure improvements to match. The proposals at Horndean, Liphook and Neatham Down are not commented upon since they are not familiar to the undersigned. Yours sincerely 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CPRE Hampshire Response to East Hampshire Consultation on Large Development Sites
    11/12/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook CPRE Hampshire Response to East Hampshire Consultation on Large Development Sites [email protected]> Mon 14/10/2019 11:17 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> Cc: 1 attachments (561 KB) 14.10 CPRE Hampshire Response to East Hampshire Consultation on Large Development Sites.docx; 14th October 2019 - by email Please find aached the CPRE Hampshire Response to the East Hampshire Consultaon on Large Development Sites. I would be grateful if you would kindly acknowledge receipt of this email. Kind regards and best wishes, Chief Execuve CPRE Hampshire Mobile: Office: www.cprehampshire.org.uk https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/1 CPRE Hampshire Winnall Community Centre Garbett Road Winchester SO23 0NY Tel: 01962 841897 Email: [email protected] www.cprehampshire.org.uk Working locally and nationally for a beautiful and living countryside East Hampshire Planning Policy 14 October 2019 Dear Sir East Hampshire Draft Local Plan Response to Large Development Sites Consultation This is the Response of CPRE Hamsphire to the Large Development Sites Consultation Applying principles of Sustainability As said in our Response to the Draft Local Plan Review Consultation, we agree in principle that new settlements can present an opportunity to be ambitious, achieving the highest standards of design, the most sustainable development layouts and the most inclusive and positive communities, supported by innovative technologies and modern approaches to infrastructure. However, NPPF 2019 paragraph 72 makes it clear that a standalone new settlement should be of a size to support a sustainable community, with sufficient access to services and employment opportunities within the development itself or in larger towns where there is good access.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test For the East Hampshire District Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation December 2018 SFRA Interim Supplement 2018 Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background 3.0 Local Flood Risk Context 4.0 Planning Context 5.0 Site Requiring Sequential/Exception Test 6.0 Conclusion Appendix 1 – Sequential Testing Scoring on LAA sites and sites brought forward from the development plan Appendix 2 – Sequential Test Methodology and Scoring Criteria Appendix 3 – A list of sites with planning permission 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document supplements the East Hampshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), October 2018 and supports the East Hampshire Local Plan 2017–2036 (Regulation 18 consultation). The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that proposed site allocations in areas of flood risk are appropriate in the context of the Sequential Test which are required as part of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its accompanying National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG). However, as this is the first public consultation on the East Hampshire draft Local Plan, the Exception Test has not been carried out at this stage (Regulation 18) as allocations may be subject to change. Those allocations that may require an Exception Test prior to the Proposed Submission Local Plan 2017-2036 (Regulation 19) will be carried out at that time. 1.2 The East Hampshire Local Plan covers the area of East Hampshire outside of the South Downs National Park. This area is known as the Planning Authority area (the ‘Area’). The SFRA 2018 therefore covers the Planning Authority area only but during its preparation neighbouring authorities were consulted to address any cross boundary flood issues to inform the SFRA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St – 31St May 2021 Welcome
    ALTON Walking & Cycling Festival 1st – 31st May 2021 Welcome... Key: to Alton Town Councils walking and cycling festival. We are delighted that Walking experience isn’t necessary for this year’s festival is able to go ahead and that we are able to offer a range Easy: these as distances are relatively short and paths and of walks and cycle rides that will suit not only the more experienced enthusiast gradients generally easy. These walks will be taken but also provide a welcome introduction to either walking or cycling, or both! at a relaxed pace, often stopping briefly at places of Alton Town Council would like wish to thank this year’s main sponsor, interest and may be suitable for family groups. the Newbury Buiding Society and all of the volunteers who have put together a programme to promote, share and develop walking and cycling in Moderate: These walks follow well defined paths and tracks, though they may be steep in places. They and around Alton. should be suitable for most people of average fitness. Please Note: Harder: These walks are more demanding and We would remind all participants that they must undertake a self-assessment there will be some steep climbs and/or sustained for Covid 19 symptoms and no-one should be participating in a walk or cylcle ascent and descent and rough terrain. These walks ride if they, or someone they live with, or have recently been in close contact are more suitable for those with a good level of with have displayed any symptoms. fitness and stamina.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • EHDC Large Development Sites Consultation – Sept/Oct 2019
    EHDC Large Development Sites Consultation – Sept/Oct 2019 Our Response We have chosen to comment in detail only on the two sites in close proximity to Alton: Neatham Down and Chawton Park Farm. But firstly, some general observations on others of particular significance to the town:- The Four Marks sites Most, if not all, of the Four Marks sites seem to be piece-meal additions to what is already a rapidly expanding village. Like Alton, we feel that Four Marks is already taking more than its fair share of new development, and needs time to develop a proper infrastructure of supporting facilities and services, without the burden of still more housing. Most of the suggested schemes are just crude, unsustainable forms of infill, (eg South Medstead); others, such as Four Marks South and Land South of Winchester Road, would have a severe impact on the visual quality of the landscape on the edges of the village, and change the character of its setting significantly. We would therefore object to any of these sites going forward. Northbrook Farm Whilst this scheme, unlike all the others, has the merit of establishing a genuinely new, independent settlement, with its own identity and infrastructure, the landscape impact is considerable: it would create a damaging interruption to what is a pleasant, continuously rural belt of countryside, straddling the Wey Valley for the entire stretch between Farnham and Alton, for example when viewed from the main railway line. We would therefore object to this site progressing any further. Whitehill & Bordon Of all the sites, the potential for expanding Whitehill & Bordon in the way described seems the most appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Museums Service Historic Resources Centre
    GB 1869 AA2/110 Winchester Museums Service Historic Resources Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 41727 The National Archives ppl-6 of the following report is a list of the archaeological sites in Hampshire which John Peere Williams-Freeman helped to excavate. There are notes, correspondence and plans relating to each site. p7 summarises Williams-Freeman's other papers held by the Winchester Museums Service. William Freeman Index of Archaeology in Hampshire. Abbots Ann, Roman Villa, Hampshire 23 SW Aldershot, Earthwork - Bats Hogsty, Hampshire 20 SE Aldershot, Iron Age Hill Fort - Ceasar's Camp, Hampshire 20 SE Alton, Underground Passage' - Theddon Grange, Hampshire 35 NW Alverstoke, Mound Cemetery etc, Hampshire 83 SW Ampfield, Misc finds, Hampshire 49 SW Ampress,Promy fort, Hampshire 80 SW Andover, Iron Age Hill Fort - Bagsbury or Balksbury, Hampshire 23 SE Andover, Skeleton, Hampshire 24 NW Andover, Dug-out canoe or trough, Hampshire 22 NE Appleshaw, Flint implement from gravel pit, Hampshire 15 SW Ashley, Ring-motte and Castle, Hampshire 40 SW Ashley, Earthwork, Roman Building etc, Hampshire 40 SW Avington, Cross-dyke and 'Ring' - Chesford Head, Hampshire 50 NE Barton Stacey, Linear Earthwork - The Andyke, Hampshire 24 SE Basing, Park Pale - Pyotts Hill, Hampshire 19 SW Basing, Motte and Bailey - Oliver's Battery, Hampshire 19 NW Bitterne (Clausentum), Roman site, Hampshire 65 NE Basing, Motte and Bailey, Hampshire 19 NW Basingstoke, Iron
    [Show full text]
  • FAR [HANTS.] FARMERS Continued
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] 409 FAR [HANTS.] FARMERS continued. tTurvill Dllniel, }un. Pullen's farm, Warr George, Pennington, Lymington Tarver John, Corhampton, Bishop's West Worldham, Alton Warren George, Swathling, South Waltham tTurvill John, HartIey Park farm, Swathling, Southampton Tate George, Mattingley, Winchfield RartIey Manditt, Alton Warren J. Soak,Hambledon,Horn Dean Tate William Henry, ROUlsey tTurvill William, Manor house, West Warren Levi, Luckham farm, Winchfld Taylor G. Newnham Binstead, Ryde Worldham, Alton Warwick J. Martyr Worthy,Winchester Taylor James, Winsor, Southampton TwitchenJohn,Charcot farm,Whitchrch Warwick William, Awbridge, Romsey TaylorJohn, Bockhampton, Ringwood Twitchin Andrew, North Oakley, Waterfield .John, Winkton, Ringwood Taylor Jhn. Grove pl.Nurslin~,Sthmptn Kingsclere, Newbury Waterman Christmas, Selborne, Alton TaylorJhn.WiIliam,Burton,Christchrch Twitchin Andrew, jun. New barn, Waterman Wm. :Fawley, Sonthampton Taylor J oseph Hen. Winkton, Ringwood Hurstbourne Priors, Whitchurch Waters Frederick, Hollington, East Taylor Mrs. Catherington, Horn Dean Twitchin Edwin, North Oakley, Kings- Woodhay, Newbury TaylorThomas, Basing, Basing-stoke clere, Newbury Waters Henry, Abshott Hook, Titch- Taylor T. Swanmore, Bishop's Waltham Twitchin Geo. Worting wood, Worting, field, Fareham TaylorW.Eg-bury,St.MaryBourn.Andvr Basingstoke Waters Henry, Longstock, Winchester Taylor WiIliam, Noke farm,Northwood, Twitchin George Web!>, Hurstbourne Waters WiIliam, Bisterne, Ring-wood Newport, Isle of Wight Priors, ·Whitchurch Watkin James, Titchfield, Fareham Taylor WiIliam, Yateley, Farnborough Twitchin Henr)', Holyborne, Alton Watkins Henry, Sparsholt, Winchester Tee Henry, Leigh farm, Havant Twitchin Thomas, Hanning-ton,Newbry tWatney T. J. Home park, l"royle,Alton Tee Rd.Barn grn.Hambledn.Horn Dean Twitchin William, Neatham, Holy- Watridge Hr. Baddesley farm, Romsey Terry R.Ashurst bdg.Totton,Southmptn bourne, Alton Watson A.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Magazine £2 Where Sold Delivered Free to Every House in Holybourne & Neatham Summer 2020
    Holybournewww.holybourne.com &Neatham Village Magazine £2 where sold Delivered free to every house in Holybourne & Neatham Summer 2020 A Ward Sister’s Story VE Day 75 The Prince of Wales BUMPER ISSUE! Holybourne2 Summer 2020 www.holybourne.com &Neatham Village Magazine triplefff.com 01420 561422 | [email protected] 3 Magpie Works, Station Approach, Four Marks, Hampshire, GU34 5HN triplefbrewery @triplefbrewer triplefbrewery Brewery Tours Do something dierent or better still, buy a Brewery Tour as a gift! Our tours include a half pint of any Triple f beer available at the time, to drink as our Brewer walks you through our brewery. Two further half pints can be enjoyed in our onsite bar afterwards. Vouchers are available online, by giving us a call or popping into our onsite shop. The Shop We stock an incredible selection of the best rated craft beers from around the world but if beers aren’t your thing then maybe our selection of artisan Gins, Rums, Vodkas, Whiskeys and more can tempt you. Opening times : Mon - Fri 9am-5pm • Sat 10am-2pm The Bar Our newly refurbished bar with roaring re, cosy snugs, booths and bar seating serves all our core beers plus our seasonal brews and guest ales. We have the best artisan spirits, mixers and a soft drinks menu that’ll make every non-drinker drool! We also have a guest cider each week as well as a bottled range from local producers. Opening times: Wed & Thur 5 - 9pm • Fri 3 - 9pm • Sat 12 - 9pm • Sun 12 - 9pm alto nomine 3.8% A.B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at Manor Cottages, Neatham, Alton, 1984-6
    Proc. Hampsh. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 46, 1990, 17-30 EXCAVATIONS AT MANOR COTTAGES, NEATHAM, ALTON, 1984-86 By DAVID GRAHAM with contributions by M A B LYNE and R A MERSON ABSTRACT single building, dug footings for a garage extension on the east side of the cottage. Limited trial trenching, in the gardens ofNos 3 & 4 Manor These cut through approximately 1.0 m of Cottages, Neatham, revealed evidence for occupation of the disturbed gravel and exposed the top of half of area from the mid 2nd to the late 4th centuries AD. This an apparently circular, stone-lined shaft. Mr occupation, in part, probably represents 'ribbon development' Dye dug a further 0.50 m into this feature and along the Silchester-Chichester road, to the south of the recovered a number of sherds of coarse grey- Roman town at Neatham. Mortared footings were also ware and a fragment of combed hypocaust flue found, however, which are probably the remains of a tile. These finds were reported to the Curtis courtyard wall belonging to a large building, or buildings. From surface evidence, these appear to have existed in the Museum in Alton and as a result the site was field immediately to the south of the gardens. visited by members of the Farnham & District Museum Society. While no further work was possible within the footing trenches, it was INTRODUCTION apparent that Mr Dye had discovered the top of a 3rd/4th century Roman well and that other Roman material was therefore likely to The site (SU 7423 4077) lies on river terrace be present in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Planning Policy Team East Hampshire District Council Penns
    Planning Policy Team East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX 15 October 2019 Dear Sir / Madam East Hampshire Local Plan 2017-2036 – Large Sites Consultation Thank you for consulting the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA) on your large sites consultation which is seeking to gather comments on the potential large development sites being considered, to help inform the identification of the chosen sites in the Proposed Submission East Hampshire Local Plan. As you are aware, the SDNPA and all relevant authorities (including EHDC) are required to have regard to the purposes of the South Downs National Park as set out in Section 62 of the Environment Act 1995. The purposes are ‘to conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the area’ and ‘to promote opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities of the national park by the public.’ We support East Hampshire’s continuing liaison with neighbouring authorities, including the SDNPA, to ensure cross-boundary strategic priorities are fully addressed. I would take the opportunity to highlight the SDNPA’s strategic cross-boundary priorities which provide a framework for these discussions and are the focus of this consultation response: Conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the area. Conserving and enhancing the region’s biodiversity (including green infrastructure issues). The delivery of new homes, particularly affordable homes for local people and pitches for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople. The promotion of sustainable tourism. Development of the local economy. Improving the efficiency of transport networks by enhancing the proportion of travel by sustainable modes and promoting policies which reduce the need to travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Chawton Chawton
    Chawton Chawton 1.0 PARISH Chawton 2.0 HUNDRED Alton 3.0 NGR 470800 137000 4.0 GEOLOGY Lower Chalk 5.0 SITE CONTEXT (Map 2) Chawton lies 2.5km south-south-west of Alton, set out along a straight road that once formed a section of the A32. The settlement has now been by-passed. The road that forms the approximate north / south axis of Chawton exploits the valley of the Lavant Stream. It was formerly the London to Gosport road (a King’s highway) but it is known locally as The Street (see Paragraph 6.2 for further clarification). The parish church, at the south send of the settlement is situated at c. 115m AOD with little variation at the north end of The Street where it is bisected by the A32. On the west side of the A32 is Chawton Park Wood wherein are the the lines of the park pales of the Medieval Chawton Park. The Park probably dates to 1252 when the St Johns, then Lords of the manor, gained immunity from Forest Law. 6.0 PLAN TYPE & DESCRIPTION (Maps 3 / 1, 3 / 2, 4 / 1, 4 / 2, 5 / 1 and 5 / 2) Church & manor house + irregular row 6.1 Church & manor house Chawton House and the parish church stand as a group within 200m east of the south end of The Street, formerly the London - Gosport road (see Paragraph 5.0). The Lavant Stream flows south / north adjacent to the west side of the churchyard though it is frequently dry. The present Chawton House was begun soon after 1585 and was probably constucted on the site of its Medieval predecessor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ha:\Ipshire. (Kelly'b
    30 ALTON. HA:\IPSHIRE. (KELLY'B John Dotton esq. of Alton Westbrook. The. principal land­ .A.nstey is a tithing of the parish, about I mile norfu­ owners are Montagu G. Knight, John Gathorne Wood, east. Henry Hall esq. is lord of the manor of Anstey. Frederick Crowley esqrs. and Winchester College. The Anstey Manor House is the residence of Gerald Hall esq. soil is clay; subsoil, chalk. The chief crops are corn and Parish Clerk and Sexton-St. Lawrence, John Roberi hops. The arPa is 3,9I4 acres of land and II of water; Henwood Adams. rateable value, £,2I,179; the population in 1891 was 4,761, Parish Clerk-All Saints, William Pickett. including 7 officers and u6 inmates in the workhouse. OFFICIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, LOCAL INSTITUTIO:\"S &c. Post, M. 0. & T. 0., T. M. 0., S. B., Express Delivery, ~Iedical Officer of Health, Edward J. L. Leslie L.R.C.P. Parcel Post & .Annuity & Insurance Office.-John Edin. Anstey villa Fred Parsons, postmaster, High street. General Sanitary Inspector, Waiter F. Blake, Normandy street postal business from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Tele­ Public Establishments. graph business 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. ; sundays, 8 to IO a.m. Letters delivered at 7 a. m. from London & all parts; Alton Assembly Rooms & Town Hall Co. Lim. (Edward xo a.m. from London, Scotland, Ireland, Bath, Bristol Knowles, sec.), High street & West of England generally; 6 p.m. from London, Cemetery, William 'l'rimmer, clerk to the burial board Farnham, Winchester, Southampton, South & South­ County Court, held at Town hall every two months or West of England generally; sundays, 7 a.m.
    [Show full text]