DOCSLIB.ORG

Brislands Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Alton Hampshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brislands Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Alton Hampshire Brislands Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Alton Hampshire Archaeological Evaluation for CS Partnership LLP CA Project: 770435 CA Report: 16514 September 2016 Brislands Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Alton Hampshire Archaeological Evaluation CA Project: 770435 CA Report: 16514 Document Control Grid Revision Date Author Checked by Status Reasons for Approved revision by A 19.09.2016 T. Brown DDR Draft Edits REG B 26.09.16 T. Brown DDR Final Draft watermark Neil Adam removed SA HCC This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology © Cotswold Archaeology Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire: Archaeological Evaluation CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 5 4. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 5 5. RESULTS (FIGS 2-4) ......................................................................................... 6 6. DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................... 7 7. CA PROJECT TEAM .......................................................................................... 7 8. REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX A: CONTEXT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 8 APPENDIX B: OASIS REPORT FORM .......................................................................... 9 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Site location plan (1:1250) Fig. 2 Trench location plan showing modern features (1:500) Fig. 3 Trench 1 looking east (2x1m scale) Fig. 4 Trench 2 looking south (2x1m scale) 1 © Cotswold Archaeology Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire: Archaeological Evaluation SUMMARY Project Name: Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks Location: Four Marks, Alton, Hampshire NGR: SU 6600 3383 Type: Evaluation Date: 16 September 2016 Planning Reference: 25699/003 Location of Archive: Hampshire Cultural Trust Accession number: A2016.96 CA Site Code: BBL16 An archaeological evaluation was undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology in September 2016 at Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire. Two trenches were excavated within the footprint of a proposed new residential unit. Within both trenches the natural geology was revealed beneath 0.15m of topsoil and no archaeological features or artefacts were identified or present. A small number of modern service trenches were recorded within each evaluation trench. 2 © Cotswold Archaeology Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire: Archaeological Evaluation 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In September 2016, Cotswold Archaeology (CA) carried out an archaeological evaluation for Robert Maitland at Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire (centred on NGR: SU 6600 3383; Fig. 1). 1.2 Outline planning permission (ref. 25699/003) has been granted by the Local Planning Authority (LPA), East Hampshire District Council, for a replacement dwelling and renovation of an existing mushroom farm warehouse into a workshop/studio 1.3 Following consultation by EHDC with their archaeological planning advisor, Mr Neil Adam, Senior Archaeologist for Hampshire County Council, an archaeological condition was placed on the planning permission. Condition 13 states: ‘That no development shall take place until the applicant has secured the implementation of a programme of archaeological assessment in accordance with a Written Scheme of Investigation that has been submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority. The assessment should take the form of trial trenching within the footprint of the proposed new building.’ 1.5 The evaluation was carried out in accordance with Condition 13, and with a detailed Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) produced by CA (2016) and approved by Neil Adam – the archaeological Advisor to EHDC. The fieldwork also followed Standard and guidance: Archaeological field evaluation (CIfA 2014). The site 1.6 The proposed development area is approximately 0.57ha, and comprises a sub- rectangular area of land with an existing dwelling, outbuilding and mushroom farm building on the site, bordered by Brislands Lane to the west, domestic housing to the north, and farmland to the east and south. The site lies at approximately 170m AOD, and is relatively level. 1.7 The underlying bedrock geology of the area is mapped as Newhaven Chalk Formation of the Upper Cretaceous age (100.5 – 66 million years ago), with Seaford Chalk Formation, also of the Upper Cretaceous age, located in the northernmost 3 © Cotswold Archaeology Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire: Archaeological Evaluation corner of the site (BGS, 2016). Superficial deposits of clay with flints are recorded as overlaying the chalk, and this was encountered as mid brown silty clay with flint. 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 2.1 Below is a brief description of the archaeological character of the site and its environs. A detailed description can be found within the Written Scheme of Investigation (CA, 2016). Prehistoric (500,000 BC – AD 43) 2.2 No prehistoric heritage assets have been identified within the site. However, a small number of Palaeolithic (500,000 – 10,000 BC) and Neolithic (4000 – 2400 BC) flint tools and Bronze Age (2400 – 700 BC) material has been recovered from the Alton area. A small Middle to Late Iron Age settlement (700 – 100 BC) has been recorded on the northern edge of Alton. Roman (AD 43 – AD 410) 2.3 Several Romano-British findspots have been recorded in the Alton area, including coins, pottery, a lamp, and a paved floor. Artefacts and evidence of a small settlement have been recovered from within the modern limits of Alton. 2.4 A number of Roman roads may meet at a Romano-British town located 1km to the north-east of Alton, near Neatham (believed to be Roman Vindomis). The projected line of the Roman road between London and Winchester crosses the north-eastern corner of the site and is included within the footprint of the proposed new driveway into the New Mushroom Farm Building. Anglo-Saxon (AD 410 – 1066) 2.5 Alton is believed to have Anglo-Saxon origins. A cemetery from this period was discovered, yielding approximately 50 burials and a similar number of cremations. The Alton Buckle was recovered from this cemetery. Medieval (1066 – 1539) 2.6 Records relate to the settlements, and royal manors, of Holybourne and Antsy, and earthworks relating to a former churchyard boundary. 4 © Cotswold Archaeology Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire: Archaeological Evaluation 2.7 The presence of a market in Alton was first recorded in the Domesday Book in the 11th century, and a Charter of 1307 gave Alton the right to hold an annual fayre. Post-medieval (1540 – 1800) 2.8 During this period, Alton hosted a number of breweries and paper-making, tanning and cloth-making industries by the 18th century. 2.9 Historical maps show a number of disused chalk and gravel pits, particularly on the north side of the site. The same mapping survey has shown the site to be used as farmland since at least the early 19th century and contained buildings from the 1930s. 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 3.1 The objectives of the evaluation are to provide information about the archaeological resource within the site, including its presence/absence, character, extent, date, integrity, state of preservation and quality, in accordance Standard and guidance: Archaeological field evaluation (CIfA 2014). This information will enable the Local Planning Authority - Hampshire County Council - to identify and assess the particular significance of any heritage asset, consider the impact of the proposed development upon it, and to avoid or minimise conflict between the heritage asset’s conservation and any aspect of the development proposal, in line with the National Planning Policy Framework (DCLG 2012). 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 The fieldwork comprised the excavation of 2 trenches, measuring 10mx1.8m, in the locations shown on the attached plan (Fig. 2) within the footprint of the proposed new residential unit. Trenches were set out on OS National Grid (NGR) co-ordinates using Leica GPS and surveyed in accordance with CA Technical Manual 4 Survey Manual. 4.2 A proposed new trackway (Fig. 2) will be constructed on the existing ground surface and will not result in any below ground excavation. Following consultation with Neil Adam it was agreed that no evaluation trenches would be required within the footprint of the new trackway as a result of the proposed construction methodology. 5 © Cotswold Archaeology Brislands, Brislands Lane, Four Marks, Hampshire: Archaeological Evaluation 4.3 All trenches were excavated by mechanical excavator equipped with a toothless grading bucket. All machine excavation was undertaken under constant archaeological supervision to the top of the first significant archaeological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency
    SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency Date of Election: Thursday 8 June 2017 Hours of Poll: 7:00 am to 10:00 pm Notice is hereby given that: The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Ranges of electoral Ranges of electoral Station register numbers of Station register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote Number persons entitled to vote thereat thereat Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy 1 AA-1 to AA-1848 2 AB-1 to AB-1961 Alton Street, Alton St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy Holybourne Village Hall, Church Lane, 3 AC-1 to AC-2083 4 AD-1 to AD-1558 Street, Alton Holybourne, Alton Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, 5 AE-1 to AE-2380 All Saints Parish Hall, Queens Road, Alton 6 AF-1 to AF-2418 Alton St John Ambulance Hq, Edgar Hall, Anstey Beech Village Hall, Wellhouse Road, 7 AG-1 to AG-1775/1 8 AH-1 to AH-484/4 Lane Beech Bentworth Jubilee Hall, Church Street, Bentley Memorial Hall, Hole Lane, Bentley 9 AI-1 to AI-892 10 AJ-1 to AJ-465 Bentworth Binsted Sports Pavillion, The Sports Jolly Farmer Public House (Skittle Alley), 11 AKA-1 to AKA-562 12 AKB-1 to AKB-893 Pavillion, The Street, Binsted Binsted Road, Blacknest Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, 13 AL-1 to AL-1802 14 AL-1803 to AL-3605/5 Liphook Liphook Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario Way, Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario
    [Show full text]
  • Chawton Park
    What is being proposed? Enhancing Alton’s vitality and viability EHDC Retail Study Destination 2018 Turnover Benchmark Turnover Surplus/Deficit Bentworth Alton 63.47 80.83 -17.36 Chawton Park Whitehill & Bordon 36.89 27.34 +9.55 Large Development Site Alton Liphook 38.17 27.12 +11.05 Clanfield 3.41 1.57 +1.84 Beech Four Marks 4.99 6.78 -1.79 A31 Grayshott 5.89 5.94 -0.05 Chawton Horndean 25.99 31.25 -5.26 A31 Other East Hampshire 4.11 4.11 n/a Total 182.92 184.93 -2.01 Railway Line Convenience goods actual/benchmark turnover in 2018 (£ millions) Source: EHDC 2018 Site Location Plan Employment Allocation The above table is taken from the East Hampshire Retail and Main • 1200 homes including up to 480 affordable homes Town Centre Uses Study Final Report (October 2018): Table 4.4. It • Homes at an average density of 37 dwellings per hectare shows that despite convenience goods retail sales floorspace in • Local centre of up to 1 Ha with pub, shop, community the District collectively trading just under the expected average centre and employment space (-£2.01 million) in 2018, the performance in Alton is significantly below the benchmark turnover by some £17.36million. Key design themes of proposed development: Development at Chawton Park Farm would be sure to increase • High Quality Design • Sustainable Travel Choices footfall, and therefore provide great benefit to the retail economy of • Local Distinctiveness • Civic Pride the town. Proposed Aerial View • Good connections to Nature • Use of Technology • Enhancement of Historic Context • Long-term Management Chawton Park is located less than two miles from the centre • Green Infrastructure Summary of Alton, which is ranked as the No.1 settlement in the East Hampshire District Council Settlement Hierarchy Background How has Alton grown? • The land at Chawton Park is a suitable and appropriate site Paper, December 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE Hampshire Response to East Hampshire Consultation on Large Development Sites
    11/12/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook CPRE Hampshire Response to East Hampshire Consultation on Large Development Sites [email protected]> Mon 14/10/2019 11:17 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> Cc: 1 attachments (561 KB) 14.10 CPRE Hampshire Response to East Hampshire Consultation on Large Development Sites.docx; 14th October 2019 - by email Please find aached the CPRE Hampshire Response to the East Hampshire Consultaon on Large Development Sites. I would be grateful if you would kindly acknowledge receipt of this email. Kind regards and best wishes, Chief Execuve CPRE Hampshire Mobile: Office: www.cprehampshire.org.uk https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/1 CPRE Hampshire Winnall Community Centre Garbett Road Winchester SO23 0NY Tel: 01962 841897 Email: [email protected] www.cprehampshire.org.uk Working locally and nationally for a beautiful and living countryside East Hampshire Planning Policy 14 October 2019 Dear Sir East Hampshire Draft Local Plan Response to Large Development Sites Consultation This is the Response of CPRE Hamsphire to the Large Development Sites Consultation Applying principles of Sustainability As said in our Response to the Draft Local Plan Review Consultation, we agree in principle that new settlements can present an opportunity to be ambitious, achieving the highest standards of design, the most sustainable development layouts and the most inclusive and positive communities, supported by innovative technologies and modern approaches to infrastructure. However, NPPF 2019 paragraph 72 makes it clear that a standalone new settlement should be of a size to support a sustainable community, with sufficient access to services and employment opportunities within the development itself or in larger towns where there is good access.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Interim Supplement Incorporating Sequential Test For the East Hampshire District Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation December 2018 SFRA Interim Supplement 2018 Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Background 3.0 Local Flood Risk Context 4.0 Planning Context 5.0 Site Requiring Sequential/Exception Test 6.0 Conclusion Appendix 1 – Sequential Testing Scoring on LAA sites and sites brought forward from the development plan Appendix 2 – Sequential Test Methodology and Scoring Criteria Appendix 3 – A list of sites with planning permission 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document supplements the East Hampshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), October 2018 and supports the East Hampshire Local Plan 2017–2036 (Regulation 18 consultation). The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that proposed site allocations in areas of flood risk are appropriate in the context of the Sequential Test which are required as part of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its accompanying National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG). However, as this is the first public consultation on the East Hampshire draft Local Plan, the Exception Test has not been carried out at this stage (Regulation 18) as allocations may be subject to change. Those allocations that may require an Exception Test prior to the Proposed Submission Local Plan 2017-2036 (Regulation 19) will be carried out at that time. 1.2 The East Hampshire Local Plan covers the area of East Hampshire outside of the South Downs National Park. This area is known as the Planning Authority area (the ‘Area’). The SFRA 2018 therefore covers the Planning Authority area only but during its preparation neighbouring authorities were consulted to address any cross boundary flood issues to inform the SFRA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St – 31St May 2021 Welcome
    ALTON Walking & Cycling Festival 1st – 31st May 2021 Welcome... Key: to Alton Town Councils walking and cycling festival. We are delighted that Walking experience isn’t necessary for this year’s festival is able to go ahead and that we are able to offer a range Easy: these as distances are relatively short and paths and of walks and cycle rides that will suit not only the more experienced enthusiast gradients generally easy. These walks will be taken but also provide a welcome introduction to either walking or cycling, or both! at a relaxed pace, often stopping briefly at places of Alton Town Council would like wish to thank this year’s main sponsor, interest and may be suitable for family groups. the Newbury Buiding Society and all of the volunteers who have put together a programme to promote, share and develop walking and cycling in Moderate: These walks follow well defined paths and tracks, though they may be steep in places. They and around Alton. should be suitable for most people of average fitness. Please Note: Harder: These walks are more demanding and We would remind all participants that they must undertake a self-assessment there will be some steep climbs and/or sustained for Covid 19 symptoms and no-one should be participating in a walk or cylcle ascent and descent and rough terrain. These walks ride if they, or someone they live with, or have recently been in close contact are more suitable for those with a good level of with have displayed any symptoms. fitness and stamina.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walk Four Marks to Medstead
    Walk No. 5 A Circular Walk from Four Marks to Medstead 5¼ miles. Time 3 hours. GR. 672361 OS Explorer Map 132 By car: take the A31 from Alton to the village of Four Marks. Just after Charters Close turn right into Boyneswood Road and in about 1/3mile turn right into Chawton Park Wood. There is a free car park. By bus: take the 64 from Alton towards Alresford and alight just past the Four Marks sign at Telegraph Lane bus stop. Walk towards the village and at Boyneswood Road follow car directions above. By train: take the Watercress Line from Alton and alight at Medstead & Four Marks station. At the Alton end of the platform a gate (if locked ask staff to open it) leads to a footpath to Boyneswood Road. Turn left and walk mile along Boyneswood Road to Chawton ParkW ood. The Walk starts at Chawton Park grassy track to level out again and Car Park in Boyneswood Road, then descending to another grassy Medstead. The walk is on public track. footpaths although there is a small amount of road walking on Turn left along this track and in quiet lanes. The walk is mostly on about 150 yards at cross tracks level ground except for one or two (sign posted), take the path on the inclines, but no steep climbs. right which climbs uphill through Most of the stiles are sound and trees to a barrier / gate on the edge in a good state except for one or of the wood. Go through the gate two in Medstead that are broken and walk along a path between a or missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Four Marks Annual
    FOUR MARKS PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the ANNUAL PARISH MEETING Held on Wednesday 8TH APRIL 2015, commencing at 7.30pm At the Village Hall, Four Marks __________________________________________________________________________ Four Marks’ Annual Parish Meeting was held in the Village Hall on Wednesday 8th April 2015 commencing at 7.30pm The Chairman opened the meeting by welcoming everyone, and introduced our speaker for the evening, Robin Jarman, Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner Hampshire and Isle of Wight. Following a very interesting presentation by Robin Jarman the following questions were asked: Q. Cllr Thomas, are other District Council’s funding additional PCSO’S, as East Hampshire District Council are planning to do? A. Not that he was aware of, however Simon Hayes was keen to increase them where possible. Q. Cllr Sensier. Would the priorities listed have taken place without this change? A. Mr Jarman responded by saying that they had taken on the existing police authority staff, which had been an interesting experience, staff had not increased but had changed, a good deal of networking was taking place to find out what was needed, and a communications team brought in. Q. Cllr Timms. Can you please reiterate how important is CCTV? A. Extremely important, and with its inception, the police are able to use technology to their advantage and for capturing evidence. Q. Cllr Foster. You spoke about youth engagement, how are you doing this? And, are Street pastors relevant? A. A group of youths has been compiled, although keeps changing, from all walks of life and areas, such as Winchester, Southampton and Portsmouth, and new head co-ordinator is just about to start.
    [Show full text]
  • EHDC Large Development Sites Consultation – Sept/Oct 2019
    EHDC Large Development Sites Consultation – Sept/Oct 2019 Our Response We have chosen to comment in detail only on the two sites in close proximity to Alton: Neatham Down and Chawton Park Farm. But firstly, some general observations on others of particular significance to the town:- The Four Marks sites Most, if not all, of the Four Marks sites seem to be piece-meal additions to what is already a rapidly expanding village. Like Alton, we feel that Four Marks is already taking more than its fair share of new development, and needs time to develop a proper infrastructure of supporting facilities and services, without the burden of still more housing. Most of the suggested schemes are just crude, unsustainable forms of infill, (eg South Medstead); others, such as Four Marks South and Land South of Winchester Road, would have a severe impact on the visual quality of the landscape on the edges of the village, and change the character of its setting significantly. We would therefore object to any of these sites going forward. Northbrook Farm Whilst this scheme, unlike all the others, has the merit of establishing a genuinely new, independent settlement, with its own identity and infrastructure, the landscape impact is considerable: it would create a damaging interruption to what is a pleasant, continuously rural belt of countryside, straddling the Wey Valley for the entire stretch between Farnham and Alton, for example when viewed from the main railway line. We would therefore object to this site progressing any further. Whitehill & Bordon Of all the sites, the potential for expanding Whitehill & Bordon in the way described seems the most appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Museums Service Historic Resources Centre
    GB 1869 AA2/110 Winchester Museums Service Historic Resources Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 41727 The National Archives ppl-6 of the following report is a list of the archaeological sites in Hampshire which John Peere Williams-Freeman helped to excavate. There are notes, correspondence and plans relating to each site. p7 summarises Williams-Freeman's other papers held by the Winchester Museums Service. William Freeman Index of Archaeology in Hampshire. Abbots Ann, Roman Villa, Hampshire 23 SW Aldershot, Earthwork - Bats Hogsty, Hampshire 20 SE Aldershot, Iron Age Hill Fort - Ceasar's Camp, Hampshire 20 SE Alton, Underground Passage' - Theddon Grange, Hampshire 35 NW Alverstoke, Mound Cemetery etc, Hampshire 83 SW Ampfield, Misc finds, Hampshire 49 SW Ampress,Promy fort, Hampshire 80 SW Andover, Iron Age Hill Fort - Bagsbury or Balksbury, Hampshire 23 SE Andover, Skeleton, Hampshire 24 NW Andover, Dug-out canoe or trough, Hampshire 22 NE Appleshaw, Flint implement from gravel pit, Hampshire 15 SW Ashley, Ring-motte and Castle, Hampshire 40 SW Ashley, Earthwork, Roman Building etc, Hampshire 40 SW Avington, Cross-dyke and 'Ring' - Chesford Head, Hampshire 50 NE Barton Stacey, Linear Earthwork - The Andyke, Hampshire 24 SE Basing, Park Pale - Pyotts Hill, Hampshire 19 SW Basing, Motte and Bailey - Oliver's Battery, Hampshire 19 NW Bitterne (Clausentum), Roman site, Hampshire 65 NE Basing, Motte and Bailey, Hampshire 19 NW Basingstoke, Iron
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 -W2W Data
    Wheels to work hirers - East Hampshire District Council August 2009 - August 2014 Rider Age Length of Referred by Urban Purpose of Did they Location End Start After loan loan or loan find destination date (months) Rural work? 1 17 11 Press release Rural Work N/A Bordon Alton 12/09 Moped/motorbike 2 19 11 Alton JCP Urban Job seeking Yes East Worldham Various 02/10 3 21 11 Employer Rural Work N/A Liss Milland 02/10 Moped/motorbike 4 22 7 Alton JCP Rural Work N/A Alton Basingstoke 04/10 Moped/motorbike 5 19 8 Community Rural Work N/A Headley Down/ Haslemere 07/10 Moped/motorbike Centre Bordon 6 17 3 Alton JCP Rural Work N/A Upper Wield Four Marks 08/18 Public tranpsort 7 19 4 Employer Rural Work N/A Medstead / Alton 09/10 Public tranpsort / Alton moved closer to work 8 20 1 Bordon JCP Rural Job seeking No Whitehill / Various 08-Oct Moped/motorbike Bordon 9 20 4 Self referal Rural Work N/A Bordon Lindford 04/10 Public transport 10 18 3 EH Youth Rural Job seeking Yes Liphook Basingstoke 07/10 Moped/motorbike Offending 11 18 5 Info via Youth Rural Job seeking Yes Headley/ Various 11/10 Moped/motorbike Tube Bordon 12 17 4 Connexions Rural Job seeking yes Liphook Various 12/10 13 19 4 Previous hirer Urban Work N/A Alton Lasham 01/11 Moped/motorbike 14 16 2 Employer Rural Work N/A Clanfield Cosham 01/11 Moped/motorbike 15 19 1 Bordon JCP Rural Job seeking Yes Bordon Petersfield 03/10 Moped/motorbike 16 20 5 Press release Urban Work N/A Alton Alton 07/10 Moped/motorbike 17 20 3 Alton JCP Rural Job seeking Yes Ropley Alton 02/10 Car 18 20 2 Employer
    [Show full text]
  • Objections to the Proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site
    11/1/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook Objections to the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site Sun 13/10/2019 07:31 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> 1 attachments (249 KB) 0 OBJECTION to Four Marks South Large Development Site.docx; Dear Sir or Madam, Please find aached, as Word file <0 OBJECTION to Four Marks South Large Development Site.docx>, my submission of objecons to the Four Marks South Large Development Site proposal. Kind regards, ___________________________ https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/1 Objections to the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site Objections concerning Large Development Sites (Regulation 18) Consultation Questionnaire (3 September – 15 October 2019) Objection submitted by: Name: Email: Address Line 1: Post Town: Post Code: Objections submitted by email to: [email protected] And also, by post to: Planning Policy, East Hampshire District Council, Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire GU31 4EX 1 Proposed Four Marks South Large Development - Comments & Objections A Brief Summary of objections to the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site, with greater detail, fuller argumentation and source references shown below: A) General Comments and Objections based on relevant local, Council and UK Government documentation Local, East Hampshire District Council and UK Government documentation all confirm that the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site is inappropriate and contravenes, conflicts with or violates local, Council and UK Government policies (see more detailed argumentation in the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site ‘Objections in Greater Detail’ section below this ‘Brief Summary’): • The Four Marks settlement boundary does not include the land designated for the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site.
    [Show full text]