Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States 132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane Belcourt 45°N Harlem WAS HI Box Wagner NG Plummer E E TO lder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato K IOR Poplar A Toppenish L 43°N New Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N W N arm Spr L ings AK E No H r Fort t Yates U Boston hwe Billings TS R T Crow SE 41°N s Agen cy U t R O CH Worcester OR e Lame Deer A E TA N NTARIO S GON gion MINNESO E O AS Sisseton K M 42°N A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T IN I C WISCONS H Eagle 40°N IDAH Butte Buffalo Boise O C I 6 41°N R M ock SOUTH DAK E y M OTA N ou K GA ntai MICHI n R A egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee Fort Hall t R R es 24 idw Detroit E M E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine R idge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ WA 39°N IO Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD O E NEBRASKA OHI D 37°N Washington, DC Reno Salt Lake 38°N City Omaha Columbus C arson NA City NDIA 22 I NE VA Fort Dayton DA Duchesne Sacramento Indianapolis 36°N 15 IA San Francisco Cincinnati GIN 37°N VIR OIS EST A Oakland ILLIN W INI 29 VIRG UTAH Denver Richmond Virginia Horton Beach San Jose 35°N Kansas ATLANTIC OCEAN ity W C Poplar Saint lls 36°N e Hi t PACIFIC OCEAN s Louis Lexing on- t tte e Faye rn COLOR Colorado Region ADO Springs Fresno CKY KENTU So SOURI 34°N uthwest Reg MIS 35°N ion Greensboro Raleigh Saint George gion KANSAS Wichita e R INA CA Towaoc ern ROL LIFO ast CA RN 26 ,28 , 31 E TH IA Ignacio OR 37, 3 8, 44 N Las Vegas 33°N Shiprock Quapaw Miami 46 Knoxville Navajo Region Farmington Dulce Peoria 34°N Charlotte P Miami/Peoria Modoc Nashville acif Kaw Miami 12 Ottawa 53 Kaw/Ponca 18 Eastern Shawnee ic Tuba ID Federally Recognized Tribal Entity * Tonkawa Pawhuska Cherokee R City 49 33 Wyandotte e Chinle 1 Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 41 g Seneca-Cayuga io 36 Ponca Cherokee n Keams 27 2 Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town LAHOMA 30 Canyon OK Otoe- Pawnee 3 Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Valentine Ohkay Owingeh Missouria Pawnee Tulsa EE 4 Aroostook Band of Micmacs 32°N Fort NESS Chattanooga Defiance TEN 33°N 16 7 50 5 Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Crownpoint Gallup Sac 6 Cayuga Nation Los Iowa and 34 Creek An Muskogee A geles Fox LIN 7 Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma AR Cheyenne-Arapaho 8 45 Memphis RO IZON Concho Okmulgee CA 8 Cheyenne and Arapahoe Tribes, Oklahoma Riverside A Oklahoma Kickapoo TH Long Beach 2 OU Sa City 48 ANSAS S nta Zuni Ramah Caddo-Wichita-Delaware 20 1 Creek/Seminole ARK 9 Comanche Nation, Oklahoma Ana Albuquerque Shawnee Laguna 5 10 Cowlitz Indian Tribe Seminole 19 Amarillo Citizen Palm at 11 Delaware Nation, Oklahoma Sp 21 52 Potaw omi 47 rings Parker Kiowa-Comanche Anadarko Nation- 31°N ee Little Rock Atlanta 12 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 32°N -Apache-Ft Sill Apache/ 11 Absent Seminole Caddo-Wichita-Delaware Shawnee 13 42 13 Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 3 Ada Choctaw Talihina 14 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians Kiowa-Comanche- 9 Apache-Fort Sill Apache 15 Ione Band of Miwok Indians of California Eastern Oklahoma SISSIPPI 16 Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Whiteriver Chickasaw MIS Birmingham Scottsdale 17 Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Phoenix Region A San BAM 18 Kaw Nation, Oklahoma Die ALA go Mesa NE 30°N W MEXICO 43 GIA 19 Kialegee Tribal Town 31°N OR San GE 20 Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma Carlos Yuma Sacaton 21 Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma Coolidge Lubbock 22 Koi Nation of Northern California 23 Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Mescalero Montgomery 24 Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan Philadelphia 25 Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, California 26 Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 29°N Tucson Dallas 30°N Arlington 27 Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma Shreveport Jackson F ort 28 Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Sells Worth 29 Pamunkey Indian Tribe 30 Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma 31 Peoria Tribe Indians of Oklahoma ion 32 Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana So Reg Jacksonville El Paso uthern Plains 17 33 Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 28°N 29°N 34 Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma 35 Samish Indian Nation 36 San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona Mobile 37 Seneca-Cayuga Nation 38 Shawnee Tribe 165°E 170°E 175°E 180° 175°W 170°W 165°W 160°W 155°W 150°W 145°W 140°W 135°W 130°W 125°W 120°W 115°W 39 Shinnecock Indian Nation A TEXAS LOUISIAN 40 Snoqualmie Indian Tribe Barrow 41 Tejon Indian Tribe 27°N 28°N Baton Rouge 42 The Chickasaw Nation Wainwright Inupiat Algaaciq Scale 1:2,850,000 Kaktovik 0 10 20 30 40 43 The Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (St. Mary's) Miles New Orleans Nuiqsut (Barter Island) 44 The Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma CHUKCHI SEA Pilot S tation Austin Orlando Atqasuk (Nooiksut) Holy Cross 45 The Muscogee (Creek) Nation Point Lay (Atkasook) 46 The Quapaw Tribe of Indians Pitka's Point Marshall (Fortuna Ledge) 65°N 47 The Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 65°N RUSSIA Arctic Sl ope Andreafski Iqurmuit Houston n R 48 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town 26°N 27°N Asa'carsarmiut Tribe Yuko Point Hope Kalskag DA 49 Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Ohogamiut San Tampa RI Antonio FLO 50 United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma Arctic Village lskag Kivalina Alaska Region Lower Ka 51 Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) Noatak Anaktuvuk Pass Venetie 52 Wichita and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco & Tawakonie), Oklahoma Shishmaref Ambler R Kotzebue in 53 Wyandotte Nation Kiana Fort Yukon w NANA Shungnak k M Allakaket o Brevig ary's Igloo k Nunapitchuk Akiachak s Mission Kobuk Chalkyitsik u Evansville K Tuluksak Noorvik Kasigluk Kwethluk 25°N 26°N Diomede (Inalik)Wales Alatna (Bettles Field) Deering Selawik Creek Atmautluak Beaver Birch Akiak Buckland Hughes Circle Baird Oscarville King Island Teller Inlet Chin Council Rampart Napakiak Orutsararmiut (Bethel) ik E Huslia Stevens Village sk White Mountain Inset 1 Napaskiak imo Solomon Tanana GambellC om Minto Fairbanks mun Nome Koyukuk Hollywood Savoonga ity (! Agency (Go Koyuk Galena (Louden) Eagle Corpus Christi lovin) Elim Bill Moore's Slough Nenana Miami 25°N Shaktoolik Nulato Ruby Doyon Healy Lake 24°N Chuloonawick Kaltag Manley Dot Lake Beri Kotlik Unalakleet Hot Springs Laredo ng Tetlin 60°N MEXICO 60°N S Hamilton Saint Michael Cantwell Nunam Iquat ra(Sheldonit Emmonak Point) Takotna Telida Northway s Stebbins Tanacross Alakanuk McGrath Grayling Shageluk Ahtna Mentasta Lake CANADA BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS Scammon Bay Nikolai Anvik Crooked Creek Cook Ga kona GULF OF MEXICO Georgetown ALASKA Cheesh-Na Tribe (Chistochina) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hooper BayPaimiut REGIONAL Inlet Gulkana 24°N Red Devil Knik Kluti Kaah (Copper Center) 23°N Calista Chevak OFFICE Tazlina New Stuyahok OFFICE OF TRUST SERVICES Newtok Stony River Chitina Umkumiut Tununak Sleetmute Chickaloon Nunakauyarmiut (Toksoo Bay) Lime Vi llage (! Eklutna Tatitlek Mekoryu Inset 1 Napa imute Skagway JULY 2017 k Tyonek Eyak (Cordova) Chilkat Chuathbaluk Salamatoff PROJECTION INFORMATION: k Eek Nondalton West Central Agency (Klukwan) All data except the (Alaska Inset) are projected to: Legend Aniak Ken ai zet BERING SEA Nightmute Koliganek Newhalen Iliamna Chilkoot Tlingit and Haida Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area Ninilchik Longitude of projection center: 100o West (150o West) Chefornak New Stuyahok Chenega Yakutat (Haines) ! 23°N Pribilof Islands Ale t Pedro Bay ( o Federally Recognized Tribal Entity * 22°N Chugach Douglas Latitude of projection cent er: 45 North Community of St. Pa Kipnuk Ekwok Kokhanok Seldovia Sealaska False easting and northing: 0.0 Tuntutulia Igiugig Port Graham Angoon Alaska Native Village u K k Juneau Office DATA SOURCES: wigillingo Levelock Nanwalek Hoonah Petersburg 1:10M Satellite-derived land cover data and shaded relief with ul Kongiganak King Sa lmon Afognak (English Bay) Wrangell ocean bottom data from NaturalEarthData.com 2015; Public Domain Allotment Kwinhagakk Naknek Sitka 55°N American Indian Reservation data last updated in 2005 from Ouzinkie Kasaan (! 55°N Pribilof Islands Aleut Kake US Census data and USGS 1:24,000 topographic maps; City Community of St.
Recommended publications
  • Newark Earthworks Center - Ohio State University and World Heritage - Ohio Executive Committee INDIANS and EARTHWORKS THROUGH the AGES “We Are All Related”
    Welcoming the Tribes Back to Their Ancestral Lands Marti L. Chaatsmith, Comanche/Choctaw Newark Earthworks Center - Ohio State University and World Heritage - Ohio Executive Committee INDIANS AND EARTHWORKS THROUGH THE AGES “We are all related” Mann 2009 “We are all related” Earthen architecture and mound building was evident throughout the eastern third of North America for millennia. Everyone who lived in the woodlands prior to Removal knew about earthworks, if they weren’t building them. The beautiful, enormous, geometric precision of the Hopewell earthworks were the culmination of the combined brilliance of cultures in the Eastern Woodlands across time and distance. Has this traditional indigenous knowledge persisted in the cultural traditions of contemporary American Indian cultures today? Mann 2009 Each dot represents Indigenous architecture and cultural sites, most built before 1491 Miamisburg Mound is the largest conical burial mound in the USA, built on top of a 100’ bluff, it had a circumference of 830’ People of the Adena Culture built it between 2,800 and 1,800 years ago. 6 Miamisburg, Ohio (Montgomery County) Picture: Copyright: Tom Law, Pangea-Productions. http://pangea-productions.net/ Items found in mounds and trade networks active 2,000 years ago. years 2,000 active networks trade and indicate vast travel Courtesy of CERHAS, Ancient Ohio Trail Inside the 50-acre Octagon at Sunrise 8 11/1/2018 Octagon Earthworks, Newark, OH Indigenous people planned, designed and built the Newark Earthworks (ca. 2000 BCE) to cover an area of 4 square miles (survey map created by Whittlesey, Squier, and Davis, 1837-47) Photo Courtesy of Dan Campbell 10 11/1/2018 Two professors recover tribal knowledge 2,000 years ago, Indigenous people developed specialized knowledge to construct the Octagon Earthworks to observe the complete moon cycle: 8 alignments over a period of 18 years and 219 days (18.6 years) “Geometry and Astronomy in Prehistoric Ohio” Ray Hively and Robert Horn, 1982 Archaeoastronomy (Supplement to Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • The Modoc Nation (Formerly Known As the “Modoc Tribe”), A
    The Modoc Nation (formerly known as the “Modoc Tribe”), a federally recognized native nation by virtue of the Lakes Treaty of 1864 and the Klamath Tribe Restoration Act of 1986 We can no longer tolerate outright refusal of protecting our best interest. If the current conditions were to continue the outright extermination of our people would be complete. Our Ancestral land and water rights will be non- existent and we will be unable to hunt fish and gather as we have always done since time immemorial. We have always been the Modoc Tribe of Northern California and Southern Oregon. We have always been a separate tribe, we were never a band of the Klamath’s and we have never relinquished our Federal Recognition. Our Tribe existed long before there was a California or Oregon. Our tribe is a Federally Recognized Tribe, instead of taking things out of context and stating we are not separate from the Klamath Tribe. (Although the short terminology refers to the Klamath Tribe or Tribes, the long definition has always stated 3 separate tribes in all treaties). There is the Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma, who was forced there not by choice and chose to stay rather than be forced to live with the Klamath tribe. There are Modocs enrolled in the Klamath Tribe(s) as “Klamath”, since the Klamath tribe refuses to acknowledge the Modoc tribe (except when there is financial gain by using our name). We represent all Modoc people of Northern California and Southern Oregon who are enrolled in The Modoc Nation as “Modoc” as we are the Modoc Tribe who have existed in our Ancestral Homelands for over fourteen thousand years or more.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A
    Location Codes Workgroup FIPS Coding Scheme Recommendation Summary Position 1 Position 2 Positions 3-5 Interstate Case FIPS State Identifier County/Functional Entity 9 0 BIA Tribe Identifier Tribal Case (Federally recognized) 8 0 ISO Country Identifier International Case Exception 0-9, A-Z (Canada – sub- jurisdiction) Tribal and International Case Location Codes 1 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal locator codes coding scheme Tribal Case Locator Codes • Classification code - 9 in position 1 • “0”(zero) in position 2 • Tribe Identification - BIA code in positions 3-5 Example: Chickasaw Nation 90906 • Addresses for tribal grantees– provided by tribes to IRG staff List of current tribal grantees: http://ocse.acf.hhs.gov/int/directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.tribalivd • Link to tribal government addresses web site: http://www.doi.gov/leaders.pdf 11/15/2006 2 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal Identification Codes Code Name 001 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 006 Onondaga Nation of New York 007 St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York 008 Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York 009 Tuscarora Nation of New York 011 Oneida Nation of New York 012 Seneca Nation of New York 013 Cayuga Nation of New York 014 Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine 018 Penobscot Tribe of Maine 019 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 020 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut 021 Seminole Tribe of Florida, Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton, Hollywood & Tampa Reservations 026 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 027 Narragansett
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Sill Apache Energy Planning Project
    FortFort SillSill ApacheApache EnergyEnergy PlanningPlanning ProjectProject Fort Sill Apache Tribe Apache, Oklahoma 73005 580-588-2298 1 ProjectProject OverviewOverview z To create an Energy Office within the Tribal Structure z To complete an Energy Analysis of Tribal Building Space, current and proposed z To Develop a Tribal Strategic Energy Plan 2 ProjectProject LocationLocation z Southwestern Oklahoma • Tribal Headquarters, Apache, Oklahoma • Apache Y Property • East Gore, Lawton • Future land purchases z Eastern New Mexico (Near El Paso) z Arizona 3 TribalTribal JurisdictionalJurisdictional AreaArea -- OklahomaOklahoma z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe has jurisdiction over 65 surface (4,162.2 acres) and 41 mineral (2,841.4) tracts over three counties in Southwestern Oklahoma (allotted lands) z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe owns over 400 acres in rural Caddo County and within the Lawton, OK SMSA z The Tribe anticipates other land purchases within the next 12 months 4 TribalTribal PropertiesProperties –– NewNew MexicoMexico andand ArizonaArizona z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe owns 2 acres in Arizona z Portions of New Mexico and Arizona are considered aboriginal lands z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe owns land near Deming, New Mexico, an area east of El Paso, Texas 5 ProjectProject ParticipantsParticipants z Tribal Members z Area Native Americans z Local Community z Area Utilities z State Energy Resources 6 FortFort SillSill ApacheApache TribalTribal MembersMembers z Over half of the Tribe’s membership live outside the State of Oklahoma z Almost
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States
    132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane 45°N Harlem Belcourt WAS HIN Box Wagner E GTO Plummer Elder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato IO Poplar K R Toppenish A 43°N New L Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N Warm N Springs LA KE No H r Fort U t Yates Boston hw Billings R TS e Crow ET 41°N s Agency O S t HU Worcester O R N AC RE eg Lame Deer OTA NTARIO SS GON io MINNES E O MA 42°N n Sisseton K A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T SIN I C WISCON Eagle H 40°N IDA Butte Buffalo Boise HO C I 6 41°N R M o E cky M SOUTH DAKOTA ou K AN ntai ICHIG n R A M egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee R Fort Hall R west 24 E d Detroit Mi E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine Ridge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ A 39°N IOW Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD E NEBRASKA OHIO D
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Associates P.O
    THOMPSON ASSOCIATES P.O. Box467 Point of Rocks, MD 21777 Office: 703-779-8783 Fax: 202-905-0057 Cell: 301-535-0488 [email protected] COMMENT LETTER Transmitted Via First Class Mail Office of Federal Acknowledgment MS-348-SIB 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20240 Re: Petition for Federal Acknowledgment Piro/Manso/Tiwa Indian Tribe of the Pueblo of San Juan Guadalupe Dear Sirs: I am writing on behalf of the Fort Sill - Chiricahua/Warm Springs - Apache Tribe (FSA Tribe) in my capacity as Tribal Attorney regarding the Federal Acknowledgement Petition of the group called the Piro/Manso/Tiwa Indian Tribe of the Pueblo of San Juan Guadalupe. (Petition # 5) This group apparently filed an application or a supplemental application for Federal Acknowledgement on or about September 29, 2015. Although as will be pointed out in our Comment Letter and as outlined on your website; the Tribe has also filed numerous previous submissions for recognition to the Office of Federal Acknowledgement. As you are aware from The FSA Tribe's previous communications regarding Petition# 5; the FSA Tribe believes that it was not provided adequate and lawful Notice as required under 25 C.F.R. § 83.22(b)(2)(1V) by the Office of Federal Acknowledgement (OFA). 1 And thus the Tribe believes it should be afforded additional time, past the March 28, 2016 deadline, to provide comments on Petition # 5. The Tribe today, filed a "Request for Reconsideration of Fort Sill Apache Tribe's Request for Extension of Time to Comment on Piro/Manso/Tiwa Federal Acknowledgement Petition" to the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs (Enclosure 1) The Tribe wants to be abundantly clear that in filing this "Comment Letter"; the Tribe is not waiving any of its rights with regard to the issues raised in its Request for Reconsideration and that the Tribe still requests additional time as outlined in its Request for Reconsideration to further supplement this submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Qualifications
    NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND INJURY DETERMINATION AQUATIC STUDY DESIGN AND SAMPLING ANALYSIS PLAN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS OTTAWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA 811 3rd Avenue NE PO Box 110 MIAMI, OK 74354 The Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma, on behalf of the 6 TREATY Tribes of Oklahoma comprised of the Cherokee Nation; Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma; Miami Tribe of Oklahoma; Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma; Seneca-Cayuga Nation; and the Wyandotte Nation, invites qualified candidate submittals consisting of study design, sampling and analysis plan, and performance budget for a conducting a natural resource damage assessment of aquatic resources that are culturally significant to the 6 TREATY Tribes of Oklahoma. The assessment project location is Northeastern Oklahoma within the Tribes’ respective jurisdictions and areas therein where mining related heavy metals are present, as indicated in Reconnaissance Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Clay Fraction of Sediments Downstream of the Tar Creek Superfund Site in Northeastern Oklahoma (2011). This and other reference materials, including a list of culturally significant targeted species can be found at http://www.wyandotte- nation.org/community/environment/. Submittals shall take into consideration that the project’s scope of services includes, but is not limited to: 1. Measuring concentrations of As, Cd, Pb and Zn in culturally significant aquatic species that are in respective Tribal jurisdictional areas where mining-related heavy metals contamination is present. 2. Determining whether concentrations of any of these metals that are measured in culturally significant aquatic species in these areas has caused or is causing injury to those resources, the extent of any such injury, and any resulting damages per DOI’s NRDA guidance, 43 CFR Part 11, including but not limited to injury determination per 43 C.F.R §11.62(f)(1)(ii) and 43 CFR §11.64(f)(3).
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 155/Tuesday, August 11, 2020
    48556 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 11, 2020 / Notices CO 80205, telephone (303) 370–6056, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is Affairs; performed a skeletal and email [email protected], by here given in accordance with the dentition analysis on October 25, 1995. September 10, 2020. After that date, if Native American Graves Protection and Although the exact date or pre-contact no additional requestors have come Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. period associated with this site is forward, transfer of control of the 3003, of the completion of an inventory unknown, as no reliable temporal human remains and associated funerary of human remains under the control of indictors were recovered or recorded, objects to The Tribes may proceed. the Bruce Museum, Greenwich, CT. The the Shorakapock site is well The Denver Museum of Nature & human remains were removed from the documented in the New York Science and the U.S. Department of Shorakapock Site in Inwood Hill Park, archeological and historical literature. Agriculture, Forest Service, Gila New York County, NY. Records from 17th and 18th century National Forest are responsible for This notice is published as part of the documents indicate at least five notifying The Tribes that this notice has National Park Service’s administrative settlements may been located within or been published. responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 near the Inwood Hill Park vicinity. According to The Cultural Landscape Dated: July 7, 2020. U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of Foundation, the site was inhabited by Melanie O’Brien, the Lenape tribe through the Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT ACIIPIHKAHKI: IŠI KATI MIHTOHSEENIWIYANKIWI MYAAMIONKI ROOTS of PLACE: EXPERIENCING a MIAMI LANDSCAPE by JOSHUA SUTTER
    ABSTRACT ACIIPIHKAHKI: IŠI KATI MIHTOHSEENIWIYANKIWI MYAAMIONKI ROOTS OF PLACE: EXPERIENCING A MIAMI LANDSCAPE by JOSHUA SUTTERFIELD This thesis explores an individual interpretation of Miami Ecological Knowledge (MEK), which is a form of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) specific to the Miami people. Through the research project my own identity and understanding of concepts such as landscape, place, time and nature have evolved into a multifaceted and multicultural interpretative lens. This work combines MEK and ecological science to provide an example of Native American research within an academic setting. The research is guided by the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma‘s cultural revitalization effort and is intended as a contribution to that effort. Because this research was directed by the Miami Tribe‘s interest in cultural revitalization it contributes to what has been referred to as decolonization. aciipihkahki: iši kati mihtohseeniwiyankwi myaamionki Roots of Place: Experiencing a Miami Landscape A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography by Joshua Sutterfield Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2009 Advisor_____________________________ Professor Thomas C. Klak Reader______________________________ Professor Jerry Green Reader______________________________ Professor Daniel M. Cobb © Joshua Sutterfield 2009 Table of Contents List of Figures Chapter 1: Introduction and Methodology 1 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Background of the Myaamiaki 1.3. Research Goals & Methodology 1.4. Research Location Chapter 2: Literature Review 20 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Sustainability and TEK 2.3. Landscape Interpretation and Evaluation as a Cultural Lens 2.4. Place, Memory and Peoplehood 2.5. Conclusion Chapter 3: Myaamia Cultural Concepts 33 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitration Award on Tribal I- Gaming with Non-US Players
    TRIBAL GAMING Arbitration award on tribal i- gaming with non-US players amendment to their Compact the Tribe’s claim that internet An arbitration award by a sole authorising the type of internet gaming was permitted under the arbitrator recently approved a gaming ultimately addressed by the Compact13. The arbitrator defined submission by the State of Award, apparently, due to the belief the question in dispute and then Oklahoma and the Iowa Tribe of that the Compact required recognised there was no real Oklahoma as to the legality of amendment to lawfully include dispute: “This Arbitration involves such games. In the review process only the question of whether or internet gaming in which the server provided by the IRGA7, the not the Tribe is permitted pursuant is located on Indian lands in Department of the Interior (‘DOI’) to IGRA, the Tribal-State Gaming Oklahoma and the players are rejected the Compact on the basis Act, the Iowa Tribal Gaming located outside of the US. Graydon that the increased fees due the State Ordinance, and the Compact to were not justified by any offer and conduct covered games Dean Luthey, Jr., Partner at Gable meaningful concession from the through the use of the Internet Gotwals, discusses the award and State8. The parties agreed to using computer servers located on the questions it raises. another amendment providing for Tribal lands to players located fees equal to the exclusivity fees for outside the boundaries of other covered games. Again, the Oklahoma and the United States An arbitration award by a sole DOI rejected the amendment, this where such gaming is lawful.
    [Show full text]