DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 216/Friday, November 6, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 216/Friday, November 6, 2020 71094 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices European artist who immigrated to the Dated: October 22, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is United States in the 1890s and traveled Melanie O’Brien, here given in accordance with the throughout the Midwest, acquired these Manager, National NAGPRA Program. Native American Graves Protection and two items. The Thomas Gilcrease [FR Doc. 2020–24684 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. Foundation purchased Lenders’ BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 3003, of the completion of an inventory collection on June 7, 1950. Thomas of human remains and associated Gilcrease transferred his collection to funerary objects under the control of the the City of Tulsa in 1955 and 1964. The DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Indiana Department of Natural unassociated funerary objects are two Resources, Division of Historic pairs of moccasins (accession numbers National Park Service Preservation and Archaeology, 84.425a–b and 84.426a–b). Indianapolis, IN. The human remains [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–NPS0031106; were removed from site 12–M–623, in The moccasins were identified as PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] Cheyenne in Gilcrease Museum’s Madison County, IN. records, and that affiliation was Notice of Inventory Completion: This notice is published as part of the confirmed during consultation with the Indiana Department of Natural National Park Service’s administrative Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Resources, Division of Historic responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3) and 43 CFR 10.11(d). Oklahoma. Both pairs of moccasins are Preservation and Archaeology, The determinations in this notice are covered in dirt and show signs of having Indianapolis, IN been buried. Moccasins are regularly the sole responsibility of the museum, buried with individuals. AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. institution, or Federal agency that has ACTION: Notice. control of the Native American human Determinations Made by the Gilcrease remains and associated funerary objects. Museum SUMMARY: The Indiana Department of The National Park Service is not Officials of the Gilcrease Museum Natural Resources, Division of Historic responsible for the determinations in have determined that: Preservation and Archaeology, through this notice. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the agency of Ball State University, Consultation the five cultural items described above Department of Anthropology has completed an inventory of human As agents of the Indiana Department are reasonably believed to have been of Natural Resources, Division of placed with or near individual human remains and associated funerary objects, in consultation with the appropriate Historic Preservation and Archaeology, remains at the time of death or later as a detailed assessment of the human part of the death rite or ceremony and Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, and has determined that remains was made by the Ball State are believed, by a preponderance of the University, Department of Anthropology evidence, to have been removed from a there is no cultural affiliation between the human remains and associated professional staff in consultation with specific burial site of a Native American representatives of the Citizen individual. funerary objects and any present-day Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Potawatomi Nation, Oklahoma; • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there Delaware Nation, Oklahoma; Eastern is a relationship of shared group organizations. Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma; identity that can be reasonably traced Hannahville Indian Community, between the unassociated funerary organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control Michigan; Miami Tribe of Oklahoma; objects and the Cheyenne and Arapaho and Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Tribes, Oklahoma (previously listed as of these human remains and associated funerary objects should submit a written Indians, Michigan and Indiana Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of (hereafter referred to as ‘‘The Consulted request to the Indiana Department of Oklahoma). Tribes’’). Natural Resources, Division of Historic Additional Requestors and Disposition The following Tribes were invited to Preservation and Archaeology through consult, but did not participate: Lineal descendants or representatives Ball State University. If no additional Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian requestors come forward, transfer of Oklahoma; Bad River Band of the Lake organization not identified in this notice control of the human remains and Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of that wish to claim these cultural items associated funerary objects to the Indian the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin; should submit a written request with Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan; information in support of the claim to stated in this notice may proceed. Cherokee Nation; Chippewa Cree Laura Bryant, Gilcrease Museum, 1400 DATES: Representatives of any Indian Indians of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation, North Gilcrease Museum Road, Tulsa, Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization Montana (previously listed as OK 74127, telephone (918) 596–2747, not identified in this notice that wish to Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky email [email protected], by request transfer of control of these Boy’s Reservation, Montana); Delaware December 7, 2020. After that date, if no human remains and associated funerary Tribe of Indians; Eastern Band of additional claimants have come objects should submit a written request Cherokee Indians; Forest County forward, transfer of control of the with information in support of the Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin; unassociated funerary objects to the request to the Indiana Department of Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Natural Resources, Division of Historic Chippewa Indians, Michigan; Kaw Oklahoma (previously listed as Preservation and Archaeology through Nation, Oklahoma; Keweenaw Bay Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma) Ball State University at the address in Indian Community, Michigan; Kickapoo may proceed. this notice by December 7, 2020. Traditional Tribe of Texas; Kickapoo The Gilcrease Museum is responsible ADDRESSES: Kevin C. Nolan, Applied Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo for notifying the Cheyenne and Arapaho Anthropology Laboratories, Ball State Reservation in Kansas; Kickapoo Tribe Tribes, Oklahoma (previously listed as University, 2000 W University Ave., of Oklahoma; Lac Courte Oreilles Band Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma) Muncie, IN 47306, telephone (765) 285– of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of that this notice has been published. 5325, email [email protected]. Wisconsin; Lac du Flambeau Band of VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Nov 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices 71095 Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the the partial skeleton of an adult male 30– Tribes and The Invited Tribes that this Lac du Flambeau Reservation of 35 years old; the partial skeleton of a notice has been published. Wisconsin; Lac Vieux Desert Band of juvenile of unknown sex less than 6 Dated: October 22, 2020. Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of years old; and a single clavicle fragment Melanie O’Brien, Michigan; Match-e-be-nash-she-wish belonging to an individual of unknown Manager, National NAGPRA Program. Band of Pottawatomi Indians of age and sex. No known individuals were Michigan; Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, identified. No associated funerary [FR Doc. 2020–24683 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] Minnesota (Six component reservations: objects are present. BILLING CODE 4312–52–P Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake); Fond du Lac Band; Grand Portage Band; Leech Determinations Made by the Indiana Lake Band; Mille Lacs Band; White Department of Natural Resources, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Division of Historic Preservation and Earth Band); Nottawaseppi Huron Band National Park Service of the Potawatomi, Michigan Archaeology (previously listed as Huron Potawatomi, Officials of the Indiana Department of [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–NPS0031105; Inc.); Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Ottawa Natural Resources, Division of Historic PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] Tribe of Oklahoma; Peoria Tribe of Preservation and Archaeology have Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of determined that: Notice of Inventory Completion: Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the Michigan State University, East Nebraska; Prairie Band Potawatomi human remains described in this notice Lansing, MI Nation (previously listed as Prairie Band are Native American based on the of Potawatomi Nation, Kansas); Quapaw context of discovery and analysis of the AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Nation (previously listed as The human remains. ACTION: Notice. Quapaw Tribe of Indians); Quechan • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian human remains described in this notice SUMMARY: Michigan State University has Reservation, California & Arizona; Red represent the physical remains of three completed an inventory of human Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa individuals of Native American remains in consultation with the Indians of Wisconsin; Red Lake Band of ancestry. appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Chippewa Indians, Minnesota; Sac & • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a Hawaiian organizations and has Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 225/Tuesday, November 21, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 21, 2000 / Notices 69963 Mohican Indians of Wisconsin, the Band of Mohawk Indians of New York, Dated: November 14, 2000. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community of John Robbins, New York, and the Tuscarora Nation of Mohican Indians of Wisconsin, the Assistant Director, Cultural Resources New York. Representatives of any other Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of Stewardship and Partnerships. Indian tribe that believes itself to be New York, and the Tuscarora Nation of [FR Doc. 00±29810 Filed 11±20±00; 8:45 am] culturally affiliated with these human New York. BILLING CODE 4310±70±F remains and associated funerary objects In 1961±1962, partial human remains should contact Connie Bodner, NAGPRA Liaison, Rochester Museum representing 25 individuals were DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and Science Center, 657 East Avenue, recovered from the Pen site (Tly 003) in Rochester, NY 14607±2177, telephone Lafayette, Onondaga County, NY, by National Park Service (716) 271±4552, extension 345, before Peter Pratt and other unnamed Notice of Inventory Completion for December 21, 2000. Repatriation of the individuals. These were donated to the Rochester Museum and Science Center Native American Human Remains and human remains to the St. Regis Band of Associated Funerary Objects in the Mohawk Indians of New York may in 1979. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary Possession of the Rochester Museum begin after that date if no additional and Science Center, Rochester, NY claimants come forward. objects are present. Dated: November 14, 2000. Based on skeletal morphology, these AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Indian Land Claims: a Historical and Legal Perspective
    Delaware Indian land Claims: A Historical and Legal Perspective DAVID A. EZZO Alden, New York and MICHAEL MOSKOWITZ Wantagh, New York In this paper we shall discuss Delaware Indian land claims in both a histori­ cal and legal context. The first section of the paper deals with the historical background necessary to understand the land claims filed by the Delaware. In the second part of the paper the focus is on a legal review of the Delaware land claims cases. Ezzo is responsible for the first section while Moskowitz is responsible for the second section. 1. History The term Delaware has been used to describe the descendants of the Native Americans that resided in the Delaware River Valley and other adjacent areas at the start of the 17th century. The Delaware spoke two dialects: Munsee and Unami, both of these belong to the Eastern Algonquian Lan­ guage family. Goddard has noted that the Delaware never formed a single political unit. He also has noted that the term Delaware was only applied to these groups after they had migrated from their original Northeastern homeland. Goddard sums up the Delaware migration as follows: The piecemeal western migration, in the face of white settlement and its attendant pressures during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, left the Delaware in a number of widely scattered places in Southern Ontario, Western New York, Wisconsin, Kansas and Oklahoma. Their history involves the repeated divisions and consolidations of many villages and of local, political and linguistic groups that developed in complicated and incompletely known ways. In addition, individuals, families and small groups were constantly moving from place to place.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 23/Wednesday, February 4, 2015
    6120 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices determined they are of Native American Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, subject to Liaison, History Colorado, 1200 ancestry. No known individuals were forthcoming conditions imposed by the Broadway, Denver, CO 80203, telephone identified. No associated funerary Secretary of the Interior. On May 15–16, (303) 866–4531, email sheila.goff@ objects are present. 2008, the responses from the Jicarilla state.co.us by March 6, 2015. After that In May 2014, human remains Apache Nation, New Mexico, and the date, if no additional requestors have representing, at minimum, one Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma were come forward, transfer of control of the individual were inadvertently submitted to the Review Committee. On human remains to the Southern Ute discovered at the bottom of a slope on September 23, 2008, the Assistant Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute private property near Grand Mesa, CO. Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Reservation, Colorado, and the Ute The Mesa County Coroner investigated Parks, as the designee for the Secretary Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain and ruled out forensic interest. The of the Interior, transmitted the Reservation, Colorado, New Mexico & exact location from which the human authorization for the disposition of Utah may proceed. remains originated could not be located, culturally unidentifiable human History Colorado is responsible for but it is presumed they eroded from remains according to the Process and notifying The Consulted and Invited higher ground. The human remains NAGPRA, pending publication of a Tribes that this notice has been were transferred to History Colorado, Notice of Inventory Completion in the published.
    [Show full text]
  • [Nps-Waso-Nagpra-Nps0031649; Ppwocradn0-Pcu00rp14.R50000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/01/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-06655, and on govinfo.gov 4312-52 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-NPS0031649; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Princeton University has completed an inventory of human remains, in consultation with the appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations and has determined that there is no cultural affiliation between the human remains and any present-day Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request to Princeton University. If no additional requestors come forward, transfer of control of the human remains to the Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request with information in support of the request to Princeton University at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Bryan R. Just, Princeton University Art Museum, Princeton, NJ 08544, telephone (609) 258-8805, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A
    Location Codes Workgroup FIPS Coding Scheme Recommendation Summary Position 1 Position 2 Positions 3-5 Interstate Case FIPS State Identifier County/Functional Entity 9 0 BIA Tribe Identifier Tribal Case (Federally recognized) 8 0 ISO Country Identifier International Case Exception 0-9, A-Z (Canada – sub- jurisdiction) Tribal and International Case Location Codes 1 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal locator codes coding scheme Tribal Case Locator Codes • Classification code - 9 in position 1 • “0”(zero) in position 2 • Tribe Identification - BIA code in positions 3-5 Example: Chickasaw Nation 90906 • Addresses for tribal grantees– provided by tribes to IRG staff List of current tribal grantees: http://ocse.acf.hhs.gov/int/directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.tribalivd • Link to tribal government addresses web site: http://www.doi.gov/leaders.pdf 11/15/2006 2 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal Identification Codes Code Name 001 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 006 Onondaga Nation of New York 007 St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York 008 Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York 009 Tuscarora Nation of New York 011 Oneida Nation of New York 012 Seneca Nation of New York 013 Cayuga Nation of New York 014 Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine 018 Penobscot Tribe of Maine 019 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 020 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut 021 Seminole Tribe of Florida, Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton, Hollywood & Tampa Reservations 026 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 027 Narragansett
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Indians V. Cherokee Nation, 193 US
    DELAWARE INDIANS v. CHEROKEE NATION. 127 193 U. S. Syllabus. beneficiaries of the $300,000, but the disposition of that under the treaty was to be in the United States, and only to be used for freedmen who should remove from the territory. None have removed. There is an intimation in the brief of their counsel that in their memorials to Congress they ex- pressed a willingness to remove, but Congress did not choose and has not chosen to remove them; indeed, has provided for the exact opposite-provided for the allotment of homes to them out of the lands of the Indians and for payment to the Indians therefor if it should be determined, in this suit, that the freedmen were not, independently of that agree- ment, "entitled to allotments in Choctaw and Chickasaw lands." As we hold the freedmen were not so entitled, the decree of the Court of Claims is Afirmed. DELAWARE INDIANS v. CHEROKEE NATION. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 240. Argued December 1, 2, 1903.-Decided February 23, 1904. In a suit brought under § 25 of the act of June 28, 1898, 30 Stat. 495, by the Delaware Indians residing in the Cherokee Nation for the purpose of determining their rights in and to the lands and funds of the Cherokee Nation under their contract and agreement with the Cherokee Nation of April 8, 1867. Held that the registered Delawares acquired in the 157,000 acres set off to them east of the ninety-sixth meridian only the right of occupancy during life with a right upon allotment of the lands to not less than 160 acres together with their improvements, and their children and descend- ants took only the rights of other citizens of the Cherokee Nation as the same are regulated by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: New York State Museum
    74866 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 18, 2012 / Notices connecting the two substations, an comments resulted in the addition of History and Description of the Cultural electrical interconnection facility/ clarifying text, but did not significantly Items switchyard owned and operated by change the proposed alternatives. The cultural items are eight wampum Western, an operations and belts. Seven of the wampum belts are on maintenance building, and temporary Vanessa Hice, Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands. loan to the Seneca National Museum in and long-term laydown areas. Three Salamanca, NY, and one wampum belt meteorological towers would remain on Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10. is housed at the New York State the site to measure the wind speed and [FR Doc. 2012–30537 Filed 12–14–12; 4:15 pm] Museum in Albany, NY. direction across the site over the life of BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P The Five Nations Alliance Belt, also the project. known as the Mary Jamison Belt, is The applicant (SWE) has requested to composed of seven rows of dark purple interconnect its proposed project to the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR beads with three open white diamonds. electrical transmission grid via The belt measures 161⁄4 inches long and Western’s Davis-Mead 230-kilovolt National Park Service two inches wide. It is a portion of an transmission line. Western, a Federal original belt that measured two feet long agency, is participating in the EIS [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–11793; 2200–1100– and contained five diamonds process as a cooperating agency and 665] representing the Five Iroquois Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States
    132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane 45°N Harlem Belcourt WAS HIN Box Wagner E GTO Plummer Elder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato IO Poplar K R Toppenish A 43°N New L Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N Warm N Springs LA KE No H r Fort U t Yates Boston hw Billings R TS e Crow ET 41°N s Agency O S t HU Worcester O R N AC RE eg Lame Deer OTA NTARIO SS GON io MINNES E O MA 42°N n Sisseton K A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T SIN I C WISCON Eagle H 40°N IDA Butte Buffalo Boise HO C I 6 41°N R M o E cky M SOUTH DAKOTA ou K AN ntai ICHIG n R A M egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee R Fort Hall R west 24 E d Detroit Mi E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine Ridge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ A 39°N IOW Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD E NEBRASKA OHIO D
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]