Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2000

RESPONSE OF PARASITOIDS Dendrosoter protuberans AND Cheiropachus quadrum TO ATTRACTANTS OF Phloeotribus scarabaeoides IN AN OLFACTOMETER

CARLOS LOZANO,1,* EMILIO GONZALEZ,1 ARANZAZU PENA,˜ 1 MERCEDES CAMPOS,1 M. TERESA PLAZA,2 MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ,2 ISIDORO IZQUIERDO,2 and JUAN TAMAYO2

1Department of Agrobiolog´ıa y Proteccion´ Vegetal Estacion´ Experimental del Zaid´ın (CSIC) Granada, Spain 2Department of Qu´ımica Organica´ Facultad de Farmacia Universidad de Granada Granada Spain

(Received May 14, 1999; accepted November 9, 1999)

Abstract—The braconid Dendrosoter protuberans and the pteromalid Cheiropachus quadrum are two parasitoids of the olive bark , Phloeotribus scarabaeoides. Several chemicals such as a-pinene, b-pinene, 2-decanone, 2-nonanone, decanal, undecanal, and n-butyl acetate have been identified as attractants in the laboratory for this scolytid. Under red light at 278C in a laboratory olfactometer both parasitoids oriented positively to both enantiomers of a-pinene, and females also responded to 2-decanone. Significant responses did not occur under white light or at lower temperatures. These results suggest that a-pinene and 2-decanone could be involved in the location of P. scarabaeoides by its parasitoids. Consequently an attracticidal control tactic for this scolytid that included these chemicals could eliminate part of the parasitoid population. In an integrated pest management program, this problem should be considered.

Key Words—Cheiropachus quadrum, Dendrosoter protuberans, parasitoids, semiochemicals, Phloeotribus scarabaeoides, bioassays.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

791

0098-0331/ 00/ 0300-0791$18.00/ 0  2000 Plenum Publishing Corporation 792 LOZANO ET AL.

INTRODUCTION

The first kairomonal response by a coleopteran predator of bark (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) was reported by Wood et al. (1968), who trapped numerous () on traps baited with the pheromone of Ips paraconfusus. Other examples of kairomonal responses by natural enemies of scolytids are Thanasimus spp. (Cleridae) to the pheromones of Dendroctonus (Vite´ and Williamson, 1970) and Ips (Bakke and Kvamme, 1978), Lasconotus intricatus (Colydiidae) to the pheromone of Polygraphus rufipennis (Bowers and Borden, 1992), and Rhizophagus grandis (Rhizophagidae) to kairomones pro- duced by Dendroctonus micans (Gregoire´ et al., 1992). Hymenopteran parasitoids also use semiochemicals to find a habitat infested by their host or prey (Herald et al., 1988; Fukushima and Kuwahara, 1989; Pettit et al., 1992). These include parasitoids of scolytid beetles in several families such as , Braconidae, Eurytomidae, or Eupelmidae (Rice, 1969; Camors and Payne, 1972; Lanier et al., 1972; Kennedy, 1979; Dixon and Payne, 1980; Sullivan et al., 1997). The braconid Dendrosoter protuberans (: Braconidae) and the pteromalid Cheiropachus quadrum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) are common parasitoids of the olive , Phloeotribus scarabaeoides in Spanish olive orchards, inflicting up to 15% mortality (Campos and Lozano, 1994). In spring, while developing in logs, larvae and pupae of P. scarabaeoides are vulnerable to attack by these two parasitoids, which deposit eggs on their surface by piercing the bark. Adults of C. quadrum also feed on the host larval fluids, which ooze to the surface through the capillary made by the ovipositor. Several chemicals such as a-pinene, b-pinene, 2-decanone, 2-nonanone, decanal, undecanal, and n-butyl acetate have been identified in the laboratory as attractants for P. scarabaeoides (Rodriguez et al., 1997; Szauman-Szumski et al., 1998), although it is unclear if the parasitoids use these attractants to locate their host larvae. These compounds were identified from both sexes of olive bark bee- tle adults, frass, logs, and leaves by solvent extraction, solid sample injection, and collection of volatiles on an adsorbent in a cryogenic trap. Specifically, the mono- terpenes a-pinene and b-pinene are produced by pruned olive logs and appear to be part of the kairomone used by the olive bark beetle (Szauman-Szumski et al., 1998; Tamayo, 1998). Moreover, these monoterpenes appear also as components of the wood of many forest species attacked by different scolytids, some of which are also parasited by D. protuberans and C. quadrum (Chenier´ and Philogene,` 1989; Landolt and Phillips, 1997; Sullivan et al., 1997). The other compounds were found in bark beetle adults and/ or in the frass from their galleries. The ketone 2- decanone and the aldehyde decanal, found in the pioneer adults and highly attrac- tive in laboratory bioassays, have been proposed as components of the aggregation pheromone for P. scarabaeoides (Szauman-Szumski et al., 1998). SEMIOCHEMICALS FOR PARASITOIDS OF P. scarabaeoides 793

Our objective was to elucidate the response of D. protuberans and C. quadrum to the identified P. scarabaeoides attractants.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Parasitoids reared in the laboratory (248C ± 28C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, 18L : 6D photoperiod) (Gonzalez´ and Campos, 1990; Campos and Lozano, 1994) were sexed just after emerging and maintained for ≥30 min under the conditions used for the bioassays. A horizontally oriented glass Y-tube olfactometer (3 cm diam., 17-cm-long basal arm and 22-cm-long upper arms) was employed. Parasitoids were tested individually, with 25 individuals of each sex tested per sample. The parasitoid was placed in the basal arm and its position was recorded after 10 min. Ten microliters of each sample were added to the glass ball placed in the extreme of one of the upper arms. The other upper arm acted as a control. The bioassays were run under a constant supply of synthetic air flowing into the upper arms at 0.2 m/ sec. were used only once. Blanks were run at the beginning of each set of bioassays, and olfactometers were discarded if contamination was suspected. Results were expressed (Schlyter and Lofqvist,¨ 1986) as the percent of the 25 test individuals that entered either the treatment or control arms, and as the percent of the responding parasitoids that entered the treatment arm. To determine the optimum bioassay conditions, a set of bioassays was car- ried out in red and white light at 17, 22, and 278C with 2-decanone as the test stimulus. Experiments were performed with (±)-a-pinene (98% pure), (+)-a-pinene (98%, 91+% ee), (−)-a-pinene (98%, 81+% ee), b-pinene (99+%), n-butyl acetate (99+%), 2-nonanone (99%), 2-decanone (98%), decanal (95%), and undecanal (97%) at concentrations of 0.1 mg/ ml in dichloromethane. Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich (Madrid, Spain) and were used as received. Responses of parasitoids upwind to either the treatment or control arms were analyzed by the chi-squared test. Differences in responses to the treatment and con- trol arms for each condition or chemical were analyzed with the two-tailed bino- mial test (Martin Andres´ and Luna del Castillo, 1990). In all cases a c 0.05.

RESULTS

Optimization of Conditions. The percentage of D. protuberans responding to either the 2-decanone-treated or control arm was the same under all six light and temperature conditions (Table 1). The only significant response by females was to the 2-decanone stimulus under red light at 278C (Figure 1). Male D. protuberans did not respond significantly to either the baited or the control arm. Female and male C. quadrum responded upwind to either arm at variable 794 LOZANO ET AL.

TABLE 1.PERCENT OF RESPONDING PARASITOIDS TO TREATMENT (2-DECANONE) OR CONTROL WITH DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF LIGHT AND TEMPERATUREa

D. protuberans C. quadrum

Conditions Males Females Males Females

White light 178C 56 a 28 a 72 a 24 a 228C 56 a 60 a 52 ab 60 ab 278C 40 a 60 a 52 ab 80 b Red light 178C 28 a 36 a 24 a 32 a 228C 56 a 60 a 36 ab 52 ab 278C 56 a 56 a 44 ab 52 ab a Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among conditions (x 2 test; P < 0.05). levels (Table 1). Again the only significant response by females was to the 2-decanone stimulus under red light at 278C (Figure 1) whereas the male C. quadrum showed the same response as male D. protuberans. Therefore, all fur- ther bioassays for both species were run under red light at 278C. Response to P. scarabaeoides Attractants. Both sexes of D. protuberans responded upwind equally to the test and control odor regardless of the test chemical placed in one of the upper arms of the Y-tube olfactometer (Table 2). Of those individuals that did respond, however, a significantly higher number of both sexes chose the treatment over the control arm, when the test chemical was (±)-, (+)- or (−)-a-pinene (Figure 2). Females also responded significantly to 2-decanone. A 1 : 1 mixture of (±)-a-pinene and 2-decanone did not elicit a higher response than either stimulus alone. When one test arm was baited, more male C. quadrum responded upwind to either arm when the test chemical was (+)-a-pinene than when the test chemical was b-pinene or 2-nonanone (Table 2). Females responded upwind at higher levels when the test stimulus was (±)-, (+)- or (−)-a-pinene, n-butyl acetate, or the mixture of a-pinene + 2-decanone than when the test chemical was b-pinene or 2-nonanone. No differences were observed among the other chemicals (Table 2). Of the individuals that did respond, both sexes of C. quadrum selected the baited arm in a pattern similar to that found with D. protuberans, except that males did not respond significantly to (±)-a-pinene (Figure 2).

DISCUSSION

The optimal conditions of light and temperature for response in the olfac- tometer by both D. protuberans and C. quadrum (red light and 278C) are similar SEMIOCHEMICALS FOR PARASITOIDS OF P. scarabaeoides 795 < 0.05 (two-tailed binomial test). P temperature tested. * . 1. Percent of responding parasitoids to treatment (2-decanone) or control with the different conditions light and IG F 796 LOZANO ET AL.

TABLE 2.PERCENT OF RESPONDING PARASITOID TO TREATMENT OR CONTROL WITH DIFFERENT CHEMICALS TESTEDa

D. protuberans C. quadrum

Chemical Males Females Males Females

(±)-a-pinene 48 a 52 a 40 ab 68 b (+)-a-pinene 52 a 60 a 72 b 72 b (−)-a-pinene 64 a 68 a 64 ab 64 b b-pinene 44 a 48 a 32 a 24 a n-Butyl acetate 40 a 28 a 40 ab 64 b 2-nonanone 60 a 76 a 28 a 24 a 2-decanone 56 a 56 a 44 ab 52 ab Decanal 76 a 64 a 52 ab 52 ab Undecanal 48 a 56 a 48 ab 48 ab a-Pinene + 2-decanone 64 a 72 b aDifferent letters in the same column indicate significant differences among chemicals (x2 test, P < 0.05). to those conditions (258C ± 28C in the dark) under which the fecundity of D. pro- tuberans and C. quadrum is greatest (Campos and Lozano, 1994). The responses of males and females of both species to a-pinene and the further response of females to 2-decanone, suggest that these chemicals could be involved in the location of P. scarabaeoides by its parasitoids. Under our experimental condi- tions there was no evidence of synergism between the two chemicals. Stimuli such as 2-decanone derived directly from the host are generally the most reliable source of information, but their effect is often limited to short distances. Stimuli such as a-pinene from plants are usually released in large quantities but are less reliable as indicators of host presence (Vet et al., 1991). Therefore, a-pinene could be used by these parasitoids (males and females) for long-distance location of the host habitat, e.g., pruned olive logs (Campos and Lozano, 1994), whereas 2-decanone could be used at short range to find their hosts. The limited response of these parasitoids to only two of the seven P. scarabaeoides attractants tested is consistent with the olfactory behavior of other natural enemies. For example, E. lecontei respond to only two components (ipsenol and ipsdienol) of the pheromone of Ips paraconfusus and not to a third one (cis-verbenol) (Wood et al., 1968). Thanasimus spp. in North America also respond mainly to a single pheromone component, frontalin, which is produced by several Dendroctonus spp. (Borden, 1974). Our results indicate that the inclusion of a-pinene and 2-decanone in an attracticidal control tactic for the olive bark beetle could lead to the elimination of part of the parasitoid population along with its intended bark beetle target. SEMIOCHEMICALS FOR PARASITOIDS OF P. scarabaeoides 797 < 0.05 (two- P tailed binomial test). . 2. Percent of responding parasitoids to treatment or control with the different chemicals tested. * IG F 798 LOZANO ET AL.

Thus, in an integrated pest management program, it would be necessary to eval- uate the impact of parasitoid capture in relation to the percent parasitism caused.

Acknowledgments—The authors thank the referees for their useful comments. This work has been supported by research project AGF-95-0969-C02-01 funded by CICYT.

REFERENCES

BAKKE, A., and KVAMME, T. 1978. Kairomone response by the predators Thanasimus formicar- ius and Thanasimus rufipes to the synthetic pheromone of Ips typographus. Nor. J. Entomol. 25:41–43. BORDEN, J. H. 1974. Aggregation pheromones in the Scolytidae, pp. 135–160, in M. C. Birch (ed.). Pheromones. North Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam. BOWERS, W. W., and BORDEN, J. H. 1992. Attraction of Lasconotus inticatus Kraus. (Coleoptera: Colydiidae) to the aggregation pheromone of the four-eyed spruce bark beetle, Polygraphus rufipennis (Kirby) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 124:1–5. CAMORS, F. B., and PAYNE, T. L. 1972. Resistance of Heydenia unica (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) pheromones and a host tree terpene. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65:31–33. CAMPOS, M., and LOZANO,C.1994. Observations on the reproductive biology of two para- sites of Hylesinu varius and Phloeotribus scarabaeoides (Col: Scolytidae): Cheiropachus quadrum (Hym: Pteromalidae) and Dendrosoter protuberans (Hym: Braconidae). Entomophaga 39:51–59. CHENIER´ , J. V. R., and PHILOGENE` , B. J. R. 1989. Field responses of certain forest coleoptera to conifer monoterpenes and ethanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1729–1745. DIXON, W. N., and PAYNE,T.L.1980. Attraction of entomophagous and associate insects of the Southern pine beetle to beetle- and host tree-produced volatiles. J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 15:378–389. FUKUSHIMA, J., and KUWAHARA, Y. 1989. Isolation and identification of a kairomone responsible for the stinging behavior of Bracon hebetor Say (Hym: Braconidae) from frass of the almond moth Cadra cautella Walker. Agric. Biol. Chem. 53:3057–3059. GONZALEZ´ , R., and CAMPOS, M. 1990. Rearing of Cheiropachus quadrum under standard laboratory conditions. Redia 73:495–505. GREGORIE` , J. C., COUILLIEN, D., DRUMONT, A., MEYER, H., and FRANCKE, W. 1992. Semiochemicals and the management of Rhyzophagus grandis Gyll. (Col., Rhizophagidae) for the biocontrol of Dendroctonus micans Kung (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 114:110–112. HERALD, F., KELLER, M. A., LEWIS, W. J., and TUMLINSON, J. H. 1988. Beneficial behavior mediated by airbone semiochemicals. IV. Influence on host diet on host-oriented flight chamber responses of Microplitis demolitor Wilkinson. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1597–1606. KENNEDY, B. H. 1979. The effect of multilure on parasites of the European elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 25:116–118. LANDOLT, P. J., and PHILLIPS, T. W. 1997. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:371–391. LANIER, G. N., BIRCH, M. C., SCHMITZ, R. F., and FURNISS, M. M. 1972. Pheromones of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Variation in response among tree populations. Can. Entomol. 104:1917–1923. MARTIN ANDRES´ , A., and LUNA DEL CASTILLO, J. D. 1990. Bioestad´ıstica para las Ciencias de la Salud. Ed. Norma, Madrid, 622 pp. SEMIOCHEMICALS FOR PARASITOIDS OF P. scarabaeoides 799

PETTIT, F. L., TURLINGS, T. C. J., and WOLF, S. P. 1992. Adult experience modifies attraction of the leafminer parasitoid Opius dissitus (Hym: Braconidae) to volatile semiochemicals. J. Behav. 5:623–634. RICE, R. E. 1969. Response of some predators and parasites of Ips confusus to olfactory attractants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:189–194. RODRIGUEZ, M., PLAZA, M. T., IZQUIERDO, I., PEN˜ A, A., CAMPOS, M., and LOZANO, C. 1996. Estu- dio de los mediadores qu´ımicos del barrenillo del olivo Phloeotribus scarabaeoides Bern. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Actas de la 26 Reunion´ Bienal de la RSE de Qu´ımica, Vol. II, pp. 1005–1006. SCHLYTER, F., and LOFQVIST¨ , J. 1986. Response of walking spruce bark beetle Ips typographus to pheromone produced in different attack phases. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:219–230. SULLIVAN, B. T., BERISFORD, C. W., and DALUSKY, M. J. 1997. Field response of Southern pine beetle parasitoids to some natural attractants. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:837–856. SZAUMAN-SZUMSKI, K. J., PEN˜ A, A., KELLY, D. R., and CAMPOS, M. 1998. Identification of chemi- cals attractive to the olive bark beetle Phloeotribus scarabaeoides Bern. in laboratory bioassays. Biocontrol 43:345–355. TAMAYO, J. A. 1998. Analisis´ y determinacion´ de posibles semioqu´ımicos del barrenillo del olivo (Phloeotribus scarabaeoides). BSc. Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. VET,L.E.M.,WACKERS¨ , F. L., and DICKE,M.1992. How to hunt for hiding host: The reliability–detectability problem in foraging parasitoids. Neth. J. Zool. 41:202–213. VITE´ , J. P., and WILLIAMSON, D. L. 1970. Thanasimus dubius: Prey perception. J. Insect Physiol. 16:233–239. WOOD, D. L., BROWNE, L. E., BEDARD, W. D., TILDEN, P. E., SILVERSTEIN, R. M., and RODIN, J. C. 1968. Response of Ips confusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science 159:1373–1374.