DOCSLIB.ORG

REQUEST for PROPOSALS for CONSTRUCTION MANAGER at RISK SERVICES Where the Construction Manager Is Also the Constructor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REQUEST for PROPOSALS for CONSTRUCTION MANAGER at RISK SERVICES Where the Construction Manager Is Also the Constructor REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK SERVICES Where the Construction Manager is also the Constructor ONE STEP SELECTION PROCESS ALVIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ALVIN ISD HIGH SCHOOL # 4 PROJECT ISSUED AUG, 7, 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet ............................................................................................... Page 1 Table of Contents ....................................................................................... Page 2 Advertisement ............................................................................................ Page 3 RFP Schedule Summary ............................................................................ Page 4 Selection Process ...................................................................................... Page 5 Construction Manager Ranking Criteria ...................................................... Page 6 Submission Format .................................................................................... Page 9 General Project Information ........................................................................ Page 11 Project Specific Information ........................................................................ Page 12 Pre-construction Services .......................................................................... Page 13 General Condition Fee ............................................................................... Page 14 Construction Manager’s Fee ...................................................................... Page 16 Cost of Work Items ..................................................................................... Page 16 School District Expectations for CM @ Risk ............................................... Page 17 Proposal Forms .......................................................................................... Page 19 Attachment “A” Special Owner Requirements ............................................ Page 21 Attachment “B” Supplementary Conditions to the A133-2009 .................... Page 26 Insurance and Bond Requirements for Contractors .................................... Page 35 Prevailing Wage Rate Determination Information ....................................... Page 40 Supplementary Instructions to Proposers…………………………………….. Page 42 Required Supplementary Forms Attachment “C” Proposal Evaluation Waiver ......................................... Page 44 Attachment “D” Felony Conviction Notification ..................................... Page 45 Attachment “E” Conflict of Interest Questionnaire ................................ Page 46 Attachment “F” Certification of Criminal History .................................... Page 47 Attachment “G” Exec Order 12459 Debarment ……………………….... Page 48 Attachment “H” Cost Form ………………………………………………… Page 49 Attachment “I” Supplementary Conditions A201-2007 ……………………… Page 50 2 ADVERTISEMENT Request for Proposals from Construction Managers at Risk (CM@R) for Alvin Independent School District’s High School # 4 Alvin Independent School District will receive Competitive Sealed Proposals for the selection of a Construction Manager at Risk for the Alvin Independent School District’s High School # 4 Project, pending final Board of Trustee approval. Selection will be based on a One Step Process, with CM@R selected based on qualifications and then proposed fees. Proposals shall be received no later than 10:00 AM on Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at Alvin Independent School Districts Administration Building Board Room, 301 East House Street, Alvin, Texas 77511. A Pre-Proposal conference will take place on Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 10:00 AM, at Alvin Independent School Districts Administration Building Board Room, 301 East House Street, Alvin, Texas 77511 The selected Construction Manager’s services shall include, but are not limited to, assisting Alvin ISD and Huckabee Architects with review of design and construction documents for constructability, cost estimating, project schedule and phasing during the pre-construction phases of the Project. The successful proposer would then provide services during construction of the Project thereafter as a Construction Manager at Risk. CM@R Proposal information packages will be made available after Tuesday, August 7th, 2018 and can be obtained from: Huckabee Architects One Hughes Landing 1800 Hughes Landing Boulevard, Suite 701 The Woodlands, Texas 77380 (281) 520-4995 Attn: Michael Lovaglio, [email protected] Alvin Independent School District reserves the right to waive any informality and to reject any or all Proposals. 3 RFQ SCHEDULE SUMMARY STEP ONE 08/05/2018 & 8/12/2018 Advertising for RFP 8/07/2018 RFP Documents Released 8/16/2018 @ 10:00 am - AISD Pre-Proposal Meeting 8/28/2018 @ 10:00 am - AISD Receipt of RFP’s and opening * 9/5/2018 CM Selection Deadline to AISD BoT Agenda 9/11/2018 @ 7PM - AISD Alvin ISD Board of Trustees to Award CM Note: 1. This schedule is preliminary and may be modified at the discretion of the Owner. *All proposals received by the proposal due date will be opened for the sole purpose of recording the names and the proposed fees of the Construction Manager firms submitting written qualifications. 4 SELECTION PROCESS The selection process for this project will be accomplished in a one-step process as provided in the Texas Public Education Statute, Chapter 44, Sub chapter B. The District will receive, publicly open, and read aloud the names of the proposers submitting a Competitive Sealed Proposal. After the date of opening the Competitive Sealed Proposal, the District will evaluate and rank each submission in relation to the criteria set forth in the Request for Construction Management at Risk Qualifications. The final selection of a Construction Manager at Risk for this project will be based on a combined evaluation of qualifications and cost of services to determine the best value to the District. The District reserves the right to waive any informality and to reject any or all Proposals. By submitting a proposal, the Proposer agrees to waive any claim it has or may have against the Owner, the Architect and their respective employees, arising out of or in connection with the administration, evaluation, or recommendation of any proposal; waiver of any requirements under the Proposal Request and Qualification Submittal; and acceptance or rejection of any proposals; and award of the Contract. Submissions will be evaluated and ranked by the selection committee. The ranking is based upon the following criteria and weights: 5 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER RANKING CRITERIA 1.1 GENERAL A. The Owner shall use the following criteria for ranking the proposals and for designating the higher ranked Proposers with which it desires to negotiate. Upon ranking of the firms, the Owner shall enter into negotiations with the Proposer that has the lowest fee schedule and an evaluation grade of 80% or better. This Proposer will be ranked as the number one firm with each of the higher priced Construction Managers (with a score of 80% or higher) given ranking of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. If negotiations are unsuccessful, the Owner may continue negotiating with Proposers in order of rank until a contract at a price acceptable to the Owner is agreed upon. The Owner reserves the right to exclude Proposers failing to achieve a minimum total score of 80% from any further consideration for negotiation. The highest ranking firm with which the Owner negotiates a contract at a price acceptable to the Owner will be deemed the Proposer offering the best value to the Owner. Question – Criteria – Source – Scoring Procedures (Score – Factor – Total) 1 – Team Orientation – References – References are asked to evaluate the Contractor’s Teamwork on Construction Manager @ Risk Projects with emphasis on cost estimating, scheduling, and constructability of design and construction documents 10 Points per Reference 1.0 Factor 10 Total Points Available Preferred References (minimum 5) shall be provided BY PROPOSER in Qualification Documents. ARCHITECT AND OWNER WILL NOT SELECT INITIAL REFERENCES. In addition to 5 references selected by Proposer, Owner and Architect may select additional references. Responses from multiple references are averaged and compared with references of other Proposers 2 – Quality of Work – References – References are asked to evaluate the Contractor’s Quality of Work 10 Points per Reference 1.5 Factor 15 Total Points Available Preferred References (minimum 5) shall be listed/provided BY PROPOSER in Qualification Documents. ARCHITECT AND OWNER WILL NOT SELECT INITIAL REFERENCES. In addition to 5 references selected by Proposer, Owner and Architect may select additional reference. Responses from multiple references are averaged and compared with references of other Proposers 3 – Maintaining Schedule – References – References are asked whether or not schedules were met 10 Points per Reference 1.5 Factor 15 Total Points Available Preferred References (minimum 5) shall be listed BY PROPOSER in Qualification Documents. ARCHITECT AND OWNER WILL NOT SELECT INITIAL REFERENCES. In addition to 5 references selected by Proposer, Owner and Architect may select additional reference. Responses from multiple references are averaged and compared with references of other Proposers 4 – Change Orders – References – References are asked to evaluate the Contractor on pricing received by Change Orders and other Proposal 10 Points per Reference 1.0 Factor 10 Total Points Available Preferred References (minimum 5) shall be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Delays and Its Analysis: Indian Residential Construction Projects
    KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management www.jcepm.org Online ISSN 2233-9582 http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2017.7.4.020 Delays and its Analysis: Indian Residential Construction Projects Rakesh L. Metha1* and Suraj V. Gaikwad2 Abstract: In almost every construction project, delay is an inevitable yet controllable phenomenon. The Indian construction industry encounters an enormous amount of delays in projects. Delay affects both time and money in the forms of schedule and cost overruns, respectively. Due to impressive and dynamic growth in the Indian construction sector, planned efforts are essential to limit these undesirable delays. On account of the surge in the rate of residential building construction, the task of identification and analysis of the delays in residential projects in India has been attempted by the authors. A questionnaire survey was conducted involving 100 stakeholders. Further analysis included an Importance Index to rank the identified delays, Principle Component Analysis for advanced statistical analysis, and Correlation Analysis to check the extent of agreement amongst stakeholders. Conclusions drawn with reference to the analysed data eventually reflected finance-related issues, as well as labour related problems as the dominating causes of delays. The aim of the research is to provide insight to the construction stakeholders and researchers, on an international scale, with the obtained results. Keywords: Residential Projects, Construction Delays, Importance Index, Correlation Analysis, Principal Component Analysis. I. INTRODUCTION cost overrun in the delayed projects has resulted in a 20.95% increase in the original cost, which is USD 97.326 Billon The construction sector is a major contributor in almost [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Litigation Section Newsletter Winter 2001
    THE LITIGATION NEWSLETTER Winter 2001 OFFICERS: Chairperson David C. Sarnacki, Grand Rapids Chair’s Letter Chairperson-Elect Richard W. Paul, Bloomfield Hills by: David C. Sarnacki Secretary Anne Warren Bagno, Detroit Treasurer We are pleased to present this issue of the Litigation Section Newsletter, the Robert June, Northville first of three to focus on financial issues arising in our litigation practices. This issue COUNCIL MEMBERS: will help you to center yourself on key issues in calculating lost profits and Term Expires 2001 preparing appropriate document requests, addressing liquidated damages in Marilyn A. Madorsky, construction contracts, and understanding fraudulent disbursements schemes. Bloomfield Hills E. Thomas McCarthy, Grand Rapids Our plans are to provide you with additional resources on financial issues in Mark W. McInerney, Detroit our third and fourth issues of my year as Chair. You might recall that our first issue Kevin J. O’Dowd, Grand Rapids of the year was a theme issue on litigation management written by some of the best Jerome P. Pesick, Southfield C. Robert Wartell, Southfield attorneys in the state. Our next issue will help you understand financial statements, Term Expires 2002 and our final issue will help you deal with business valuations in the context of Thomas F. Cavalier, Detroit litigation. In order to bring you this valuable and practical advice on financial Gary W. Faria, Bloomfield Hills Gordon S. Gold, Southfield matters, we are looking beyond our membership to the very experts who assist us James C. Partridge, Ann Arbor in our litigation practices. Each of these issues will highlight the expertise and Marvin W.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Various Delay Causing Factors and Their Resolution by Application of Lean Principles in India
    Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management ISSN: 2255-9671 (online) November 2017, 5, 101–117 doi: 10.1515/bjreecm-2017-0008 http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bjreecm REVIEW OF VARIOUS DELAY CAUSING FACTORS AND THEIR RESOLUTION BY APPLICATION OF LEAN PRINCIPLES IN INDIA Shumank DEEP1, Mohd ASIM2, Mohd Kashif KHAN3 1School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308 NSW, Australia 2, 3Department of Civil Engineering, Integral University, P.O Bas-ha Dasauli Kursi Road Lucknow 226026 UP, India Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Practically speaking, not all real estate construction projects are accomplished in the defined span and within budget. Various factors responsible for occurrence of delays are one of the long-standing issues in the field of real estate. Delays make contractors endure productivity loss, cause high disturbance expenses, and prolongation costs. The aim of the research is to summarize several delay causing factors, which are observed in the execution of previous real estate construction projects. It then proposes implementation of standard prevention procedures to minimize delays. Time effect examination is the approach to evaluating and allotting the upshots of delays or changing a venture schedule. This review sets execution framework of the two sub-principles of the Toyota Way attributes known as philosophy sub-principles and process sub- principles to guide real estate construction businesses in their lean change to delay free real estate construction work. These are implemented after investigating the critical factors responsible for delays in the delayed projects by comparing their as-planned schedules with the adjusted schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Mid-Course Adjustments in Project Planning and Scheduling and Resultant Claims
    American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry Dealing with Mid-Course Adjustments in Project Planning and Scheduling and Resultant Claims John S. Vento, Esq. Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye, O'Neill & Mullis, P.A. Tampa, Florida Michael F. D'Onofrio, P.E. Capital Project Management, Inc. Blue Bell, Pennsylvania October 25 & 26, 2007 Hyatt Regency Newport Hotel & Spa – Newport, Rhode Island © 2007 American Bar Association I. Introduction II. Using the Schedule as an Effective Management Tool A. Baseline Schedule 1. Contract Requirements (Compliance with Scheduling Provisions) 2. Approval (Owner’s Refusal to Accept) B. Schedule Updates 1. Progress 2. Logic Revisions 3. Fragnets 4. Actual (As-built) dates C. Analysis of Progress and Delays D. Notice Provisions E. Risks and Liabilities Associated with Failing to use the Schedule III. Contributing to and Documenting Responsibility for Delay A. Excusable Delays B. Force Majeure C. Non-excusable Delays D. Concurrent Delay E. Compensable vs. Non-compensable Delay IV. Adjustments During Performance A. Reasonableness of Schedule 1. Accuracy of Schedule Updates (Failure to Maintain) B. Recovery Schedules C. Work Acceleration D. Issues Associated with Multiple Schedules V. Delay and Disruption Claims A. Delay Claims 1. Time Impact Analysis B. Disruption and Inefficiency Claims 1. Measured Mile i Draft 08/175/07 - VI. Acceleration (Actual vs. Constructive) Claims VII. Dispute Resolution A. Early Neutral Evaluation B. Pre-suit Mediation (Contractual or Agreed) C. Non-binding Arbitration D. Dispute Review Boards E. Declaratory Judgment Actions VIII. Conclusion i i Draft 08/175/07 - Dealing with Mid-Course Adjustments in Project Planning and Scheduling and Resultant Claims1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of Delay and Cost Overruns During
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository, University of Moratuwa Assessment of delays and cost overruns during construction projects in Pakistan Naeem Ejaz PhD, Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila – Pakistan [email protected] Imran Ali Sub Divisional Officer, Sub-Division Attock, Communication and Works Department, Punjab _ Pakistan Muhammad Fiaz Tahir PhD Scholar, Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila – Pakistan Abstract Construction projects are commonly delayed due to price escalation of building materials and faulty management in Pakistan. This research paper focused on the main reasons of delay and cost overruns. This research activity was exclusively assessed through questionnaire survey, interviews, field visits and discussion to the concerned authorities. A preplanned survey was conducted through a questionnaire for assessment and evaluation of the important factors those may effect construction delays and cost overruns. Approximately, twenty six numbers of factors were selected initially for the proper assessment of most critical factors. The respondents were selected from construction hub mainly client, contractor and consultant firms. At the same time, the opinion of general public and other stakeholders were also assessed while considering the indigenous trends. The results accomplished from survey revealed that the major causes of delays and cost overruns during construction projects are the escalation of the materials prices and discontinuity of funds. According to the group of contractors escalation of prices is the significant factor for delays. The consultants are blaming the poor supervision and mismanagement by contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Delay Control in Construction Projects Vol
    PM World Journal Guidelines for Delay Control in Construction Projects Vol. VI, Issue II – February 2017 by Dr. Mostafa H.A. Kolb, Dr Moustafa I.A. Dief, www.pmworldjournal.net Dr. Hatem S. El Beheiry, and Featured Paper Eng Ahmed Saad M. Kafifi Guidelines for Delay Control in Construction Projects Prof. Dr. Mostafa Hassan Aly Kotb Al Azhar University, Egypt Dr. Eng. Moustafa Ismail Abu Dief, Ph.D, CFCC™ ZAMIL Group, Saudi Arabia Dr. Hatem Shaker El Beheiry Al Azhar University, Egypt Eng. Ahmed Saad M. Kafafi ZAMIL Group, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT Project time is one element of construction project triple constraints, which include time, scope and cost so, different researchers shaded the light on the significant factors which may affect the project duration and cause delay or disruption. It is appropriate to identify the need to distinguish between delay and disruption of the projects. Projects may be very badly disrupted without the completion date being affected but construction delay is often responsible for making the project time to be prolonged, causing different losses to the projects. Consequently, the necessity of delays mitigation and control has risen because it usually has an impact on projects cost, depending on who is culpable either the owner or the contractor, they will have to pay to control either delay or disruption. Minimizing the adverse impact of delay calls the developed mitigation measures to avoid the criticality of the inevitable project’s delay. The aim of the study is to present some mitigation measures for risks of delay in construction projects which are considered on the standard forms of construction contracts such as the international Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) and The New Engineering Contract(NEC3) through identification of the responsibilities of each party and providing the guidelines for delay control process .
    [Show full text]
  • General Construction Contract Documents
    GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR CITY AND BOROUGH OF WRANGELL CASSIAR STREET ROADWAY AND UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS ISSUED BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF WRANGELL WRANGELL, ALASKA PREPARED BY: R&M ENGINEERING-KETCHIKAN, INC. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA February 2014 CITY AND BOROUGH OF WRANGELL CASSIAR STREET ROADWAY AND UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PART 1 - BID PROCEDURES SECTION SECTION 1 NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS INVITING BIDS SECTION 2 INFORMATION TO BIDDERS SECTION 3 BID BOND SECTION 4 BID PROPOSAL SECTION 5 PERFORMANCE BOND SECTION 6 PAYMENT BOND SECTION 7 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE SECTION 8 WAGE AND HOUR RATES - State of Alaska SECTION 9 AGREEMENT SECTION 10 STANDARD FORMS Contractor's Request For Payment Change Order Release, Waiver, and Discharge of All Claims and Liens Statement Concerning Claims Non-Collusion Affidavit PART 2 - GENERAL CONDITIONS PART 3 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS PART 4 - SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS DIVISION ONE - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01010 Summary of Work 01011 General Project Requirements 01025 Measurement and Payment 01026 Unit Prices 01043 Jobsite Administration 01050 Field Engineering 01220 Schedule and Meetings 01340 Project Data Submittals 01400 Quality Control 01410 Testing Laboratory Services 01500 Temporary Facilities 01515 Temporary Water 01545 Protection and Maintenance of Work and Property 01567 Pollution Control 01568 Erosion, Sediment and Pollution Control 01570 Traffic Regulation 01631 Deviations from Plans and Specifications 01700 Project Closeout 01710 Cleaning 01720 Project Record Documents DIVISION TWO - SITE WORK
    [Show full text]
  • Those Who Serve
    NOVEMBER 2013 Honoring Those Who Serve Honoring Ironworker Veterans 4 Helmets to Hardhats 10 World War II Merchant Mariners 15 Ironworkers in the Military 18 15331_IWNov13.indd 1 11/6/13 6:53 AM 1750 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006 p (202) 383-4800 www.ironworkers.org [email protected] INTERNATIONAL OFFICERS Volume 113 | NOVEMBER 2013 | Number 10 WALTER WISE JOE STANDLEY General President Fourth General Vice President Suite 400 1660 San Pablo Avenue, Suite C 1750 New York Avenue, NW Pinole, CA 94564 Washington, DC 20006 p (510) 724-9277 p (202) 383-4810 f (510) 724-1345 FEATURES f (202) 638-4856 MARVIN RAGSDALE Ironworker Veterans JOSEPH HUNT Fifth General Vice President 4 General President Emeritus 3003 Dawn Drive Suite 400 Suite 104 8 Union Veterans Council 1750 New York Avenue, NW Georgetown, TX 78628 Washington, DC 20006 p (512) 868-5596 Helmets to Hardhats p (202) 383-4845 f (512) 868-0823 10 f (202) 638-4856 DARRELL LABOUCAN 12 Helmets to Hardhats Canada ERIC DEAN Sixth General Vice President General Secretary #8-205 Chatelain Drive Project Labor Agreements in Colorado? Suite 400 St. Albert, Alberta T8N 5A4 13 1750 New York Avenue, NW Canada Washington, DC 20006 p (780) 459-3389 15 Merchant Mariners of World War II p (202) 383-4820 f (780) 459-3308 f (202) 347-2319 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington RON PIKSA 16 EDWARD C. MCHUGH Seventh General Vice President General Treasurer 10828 Grevelly Lake Boulevard, SW 18 Active Iron Worker Military Members Suite 400 Suite 212 1750 New York Avenue, NW Lakewood, WA 98499 Local 44 Volunteers Time for 9/11 Memorial Washington, DC 20006 p (253) 984-0514 19 p (202) 383-4830 f (253) 984-0533 f (202) 383-6483 21 Ironworkers Graduate from National Labor College BERNARD EVERS JR.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTION DELAY: Handling and Avoiding the Inevitable
    CONSTRUCTION DELAY: Handling and Avoiding the Inevitable By S.S. Saucerman Ask any contractor this question: “What’s the most frustrating tle, a few lost hours waiting for a generator, a worker showing part of your job?” Nine times out of IO, the response will deal up late to work, or a simple day-to-day material not arriving with construction delays. I agree. at the promised time. Unexpected interruptions in project schedule are a killer-and The Effects of Delay not just because they create ulcers for the project manager. Delay is so deadly because it invariably requires extra time, Imagine you’re a project superintendent for a million-dollar extra attention and extra labor by the general contractor project, and you have the enviable day-to-day responsibility of and/or subcontractors to correct the delay—all of which cost coordinating—perhaps—14 or 15 different skilled trades (in money. Now, spending money’s not a bad thing—if you had different unions), scores of workers, and hundreds of material planned on spending it. Unfortunately, most of the money deliveries for your project. expended making up for delay is (probably) unaccounted for during estimating. Broken a sweat yet? Good—it gets better! Most of the time, delay is a silent thief—slowly and steadily Now, let’s suppose for a moment that everyone of these indi- encroaching on the bottom line. Other times, it’s easy to spot. vidual skilled-trade people has their own agendas, attitudes, It may reveal itself in a bold, in-your-face kind of a way—such and opinions (of which they’re seldom afraid to share) about as a backhoe busting a hose or the main air-handler not show- virtually everything going on in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overarching Review on Delay Analyses in Construction Projects
    buildings Article An Overarching Review on Delay Analyses in Construction Projects Murat Çevikba¸s 1 and Zeynep I¸sık 2,* 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta University of Applied Science, 32260 Isparta, Turkey; [email protected] 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 Istanbul, Turkey * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +90-5332568998 Abstract: Numerous studies have been conducted by researchers on the delay analysis topic, which is one of the primary areas of scientific study due to the effects of delays on time and cost in construction projects. Following fruitful contributions made by the researchers, it is believed to be extremely important to summarize the existing studies in terms of being a road map for future studies and practitioners. In this context, not only does this study aim to detect the most significant authors, sources, organizations and countries contributing to the improvement of delay domain in the construction industry concerning delay analyses worldwide but also to provide the researchers with extensive insights concerning the prominent research themes, trends and gaps in the literature. Hence, 168 documents related to delay analyses from 1982 to 11 February 2021 were detected through the Scopus Database and the Web of Science Database, and scientometric analyses were conducted via VOSviewer software. By evaluating the related research, two main research areas were detected in this field, namely; improving the delay analysis methods and resolving the disputes before they occur. This study is believed to make theoretical and practical contributions in that it examines the delay analysis topic in all aspects such as prominent institutions, countries, authors and sources, Citation: Çevikba¸s,M.; I¸sık,Z.
    [Show full text]
  • RM8470 CONSTRUCTION DIR.Qxp Layout 1
    DIRECTORY OF ATTORNEYS 2017 ® ® ® USLAW Construction Law Practice Group MISSION STATEMENT The members of the USLAW Construction Law Group represent owners, developers, general contractors, subcontractors in all trade special- ties, construction managers, design professionals including architects and engineers, construction product manufacturers, and material sup- pliers. Some of our members also represent insurance companies in connection with construction-related issues. Collectively, the group’s members provide a wide variety of legal services related to a myriad of construction issues. Construction attorneys with diverse practice areas are brought together in a forum which allows for a sharing of ideas, insights and perspectives. By creating a na- tional forum of experienced construction attorneys and industry representatives actively networking to share information, experiences, re- sources and business opportunities, our members stay ahead of the curve with respect to current trends and construction market changes and deliver the most efficient and effective service to clients. Through seminars, publications, webinars, and the exchange of expert and re- search information, our members have access to the most current and comprehensive resources to effectively serve their clients in litigation, transactional matters, risk avoidance, risk reduction and alternative dispute resolution. WHY CHOOSE USLAW CONSTRUCTION LAW FIRMS? The members of USLAW’s Construction Law Group are uniquely qualified to assist clients in construction-related legal issues and disputes. Our focus is to provide our clients with access to a team of top lawyers who have extensive and practical experience in all aspects of construc- tion law and who are dedicated to helping provide solutions to our clients most pressing and complex construction-related needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Stability Study and Project Labor Agreement
    AGENDA Antioch City Council Special Meeting/Workshop and Regular Meeting Date: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Time: 3:30 P.M. – Closed Session 4:30 P.M. – Special Meeting/Workshop 7:00 P.M. – Regular Meeting Place: Council Chambers, 200 H Street Sean Wright, Mayor Lamar Thorpe, Mayor Pro Tem Monica E. Wilson, Council Member Tony Tiscareno, Council Member Lori Ogorchock, Council Member Arne Simonsen, CMC, City Clerk Donna Conley, City Treasurer Ron Bernal, City Manager Derek Cole, Interim City Attorney 6. BRACKISH WATER DESALINATION PLANT – LABOR STABILITY STUDY Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the Brackish Water Desalination Plant - Labor Stability Study and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate with the trade unions to execute a Project Stability Agreement. STAFF REPORT ) ( STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Regular Meeting of June 12, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBMITTED BY: Jon Blank, Public Works Director ~ APPROVED BY: Ron Bernal, City Manager SUBJECT: Brackish Water Desalination Plant - Labor Stability Study RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the Brackish Water Desalination Plant - Labor Stability Study and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate with the trade unions to execute a Project Stability Agreement. STRATEGIC PURPOSE This action supports Strategy K-1 in the Strategic Plan by ensuring well-maintained public facilities and .Strategy K-2 by delivering high quality water to our customers. By investigating and pursuing alternative potable water sources that improve treated water reliability, especially in times of severe drought, this project is an important part of maintaining a highly functioning and reliable water system.
    [Show full text]