DOCSLIB.ORG

Unipro Group Consolidated Financial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unipro Group Consolidated Financial UNIPRO GROUP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND AUDITOR’S REPORT 31 DECEMBER 2017 Contents AUDITOR’S REPORT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Statement of Financial Position .......................................................................... 1 Consolidated Statement of comprehensive Income ................................................................. 2 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ......................................................................... 3 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ................................................................................... 4 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1. The Group and its operations ...................................................................................... 5 Note 2. Principles of preparation and summary of significant accounting policies .................. 8 Note 3. Critical accounting estimates and assumptions ........................................................ 20 Note 4. Adoption of New or Revised Standards and Interpretations .................................... 21 Note 5. Related Parties .......................................................................................................... 24 Note 6. Acquisitions and disposals ........................................................................................ 26 Note 7. Property, plant and equipment ................................................................................... 28 Note 8. Intangible assets ........................................................................................................ 32 Note 9. Investments in joint ventures ..................................................................................... 32 Note 10. Other non-current assets ......................................................................................... 34 Note 11. Inventories ............................................................................................................... 35 Note 12. Accounts receivable and prepayments .................................................................... 35 Note 13. Short-term financial assets ...................................................................................... 35 Note 14. Equity ....................................................................................................................... 35 Note 15. Pension liabilities ..................................................................................................... 36 Note 16. Accounts payable and accruals ............................................................................... 39 Note 17. Taxes payable other than income tax ...................................................................... 39 Note 18. Income tax ............................................................................................................... 39 Note 19. Revenue ................................................................................................................... 41 Note 20. Operating expenses ................................................................................................. 42 Note 21. Other operating income ........................................................................................... 42 Note 22. Finance income and expense .................................................................................. 43 Note 23. Basic and diluted earnings per share payable to shareholders of PJSC Unipro ..... 43 Note 24. Commitments ........................................................................................................... 43 Note 25. Contingencies .......................................................................................................... 44 Note 26. Financial instruments and financial risk factors ....................................................... 46 Note 27. Risks associated with capital (capital management) ............................................... 51 Note 28. Segment information ................................................................................................ 52 Note 29. Events after the balance sheet date ........................................................................ 53 Independent Auditor’s Report To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of PJSC Unipro: Our opinion In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the PJSC Unipro (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (together – the “Group”) as at 31 December 2017, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). What we have audited The Group’s consolidated financial statements comprise: • the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2017; • the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended; • the consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year then ended; • the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and • the notes to the consolidated financial statements, which include summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Independence We are independent of the Group in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) together with the ethical requirements of the Auditor’s Professional Ethics Code and Auditor’s Independence Rules that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in the Russian Federation. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. AO PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit White Square Office Center 10 Butyrsky Val Moscow, Russia, 125047 T: +7 (495) 967-6000, F:+7 (495) 967-6001, www.pwc.ru TRANSLATOR'S EXPLANATORY NOTE: This version of our report is a translation from the original, which was prepared in Russian. All possible care has been taken to ensure that the translation is an accurate representation of the original. However, in all matters of interpretation of information, views or opinions, the original language version of our report takes precedence over this translation. This English translation does not contain the English translation of the explanatory notes, which are part of the official Russian version of the accompanying financial statements. 1 Our audit approach Overview • Overall group materiality: Russian Roubles (“RUB”) 1,093 million, which represents 5% of adjusted profit before tax. • We conducted audit work at PJSC Unipro in Russia, Moscow. • Our audit scope addressed 99,2% of the Group’s revenues and 99,8% of the Group’s absolute value of underlying profit before income tax. • Impairment of property, plant and equipment. We designed our audit by determining materiality and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements. In particular, we considered where management made subjective judgements; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. Materiality The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. An audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material if individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements. Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall group materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole as set out in the table below. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, if any, both individually and in aggregate on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. Overall group materiality RUB 1,093 million 2 TRANSLATOR'S EXPLANATORY NOTE: This version of our report is a translation from the original, which was prepared in Russian. All possible care has been taken to ensure that the translation is an accurate representation of the original. However, in all matters of interpretation of information, views or opinions, the original language version of our report takes precedence over this translation. This English translation does not contain the English translation of the explanatory notes, which are part of the official Russian version of the accompanying financial statements. How
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unipro Group Consolidated Financial Statements
    UNIPRO GROUP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 31 DECEMBER 2018 Contents INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ......................................................................................... 1 Consolidated Statement of comprehensive Income ................................................................................ 2 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ........................................................................................ 3 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows .................................................................................................. 4 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1. The Group and its operations ..................................................................................................... 5 Note 2. Principles of preparation and summary of significant accounting policies ................................. 7 Note 3. Critical accounting estimates and assumptions ........................................................................ 19 Note 4. Application of new and revised standards and clarifications .................................................... 20 Note 5. Related Parties ......................................................................................................................... 25 Note 6. Acquisitions and disposals .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report ‘06 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT ‘06 CONTENTS MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS ————————————————————————————— 4 MISSION AND STRATEGY ———————————————————————————————— 7 COMPANY OVERVIEW ————————————————————————————————— 13 ² GENERAL INFORMATION 13 ² GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION 14 ² CALENDAR OF KEY 2006 EVENTS 15 ² REORGANIZATION 16 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE —————————————————————————————— 21 ² PRINCIPLES AND DOCUMENTS 21 ² MANAGEMENT BODIES OF THE COMPANY 22 ² CONTROL BODIES 39 ² AUDITOR 40 ² ASSOCIATED AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES 40 ² INTERESTED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 41 SECURITIES AND EQUITY ——————————————————————————————— 43 ² CHARTER CAPITAL STRUCTURE 43 ² STOCK MARKET 44 ² DIVIDEND HISTORY 48 ² REGISTRAR 49 OPERATING ACTIVITIES. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ——————————————— 51 ² GENERATING FACILITIES 51 ² FUEL SUPPLY 52 ² ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION 56 ² HEAT PRODUCTION 59 ² BASIC PRODUCTION ASSETS REPAIR 59 ² INCIDENT AND INJURY RATES. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY 60 ² ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 61 ELECTRICITY AND HEAT MARKETS ——————————————————————————— 65 ² COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT. OVERVIEW OF KEY MARKETS 65 ² ELECTRICITY AND HEAT SALES 67 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW ————————————————————————————————— 73 ² FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 73 ² REVENUES AND EXPENSES BREAKDOWN 81 INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES ———————————————————————————————— 83 ² INVESTMENT STRATEGY 83 ² INVESTMENT PROGRAM 84 ² INVESTMENT PROGRAM FINANCING SOURCES 86 ² DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS 87 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT —————————————————————— 89 PERSONNEL AND SOCIAL POLICY. SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP ———————————————— 91 INFORMATION FOR INVESTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS ——————————————————
    [Show full text]
  • Methodical Approach to Assessing the Effectiveness of the Management System of Thermal Power Plants in Russia
    E3S Web of Conferences 124, 04003 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912404003 SES-2019 Methodical approach to assessing the effectiveness of the management system of thermal power plants in Russia P. I. Okley1, V. K. Lozenko1 and R. I. Inamov1,* 1 National Research University "Moscow Power Engineering Institute", Moscow, Russia Abstract. Physical deterioration of thermal power plants based on hydrocarbon fuels leads to technological violations (TV) in their work. Low rates of renewal of thermal generation predetermines the further exploitation of old capacities. In this regard, the activity of the management of energy holdings (EH) is more focused on maintaining the equipment in working condition. The methods, approaches and tools underlying decision-making by the management of energy holding companies are different, respectively, the results of the functioning of the organized management systems (MS) of each company are also different. To assess the effectiveness of the management system it is proposed to use such a generalized indicator as the number of technological violations per year per 1 GW of installed capacity. 1 Introduction capacity — for example, the balance of the largest holdings includes both traditional thermal power plants The electric power industry is one of the key areas of and nuclear and hydro generation. To understand the Russia's development, the country's economy and social scale of management activities it is interesting to find out position of all citizens depend on it. This industry is he general values of the installed capacity belonging to represented by 11 largest holding companies, which each holding in addition to data on production volumes produce about 85% of electricity (in 2018 - 921.8 billion and the technological structure of the generating kW*h) of the total annual production (1076.2 billion complex of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS LETTER Weekly
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody March 5, 2020 Issue No. 2020/08 Company News Polyus to become Moscow Exchange’s blue chip instead of Severstal On February 28, 2020 it was reported that the Moscow Exchange planned to include the ordinary shares of Russian gold producer Polyus in its Blue Chip index instead of the shares of steelmaker Severstal on March 20. The depository receipts of multi-industry holding En+ Group will be replaced with its shares, and the shares together with the depository receipts of payment system operator Qiwi will be considered to be added to the MOEX Russia Index and the RTS Index. Other changes to the indices include addition of depository receipts of real estate developer Etalon Group and exclusion of Seligdar from the Broad Market Index, inclusion of ordinary shares of fertilizer producer Acron and Pharmacy Chain 36.6 in the SMID Index, and exclusion of ordinary shares of oil company RussNeft and oil and gas pipe producer TMK from the Oil and Gas Index. The committee also recommended that the Moscow Exchange launch a new sectorial index for the Russian real estate industry. Mail.ru’s board of directors approves listing on Moscow Exchange On March 2, 2020 the board of directors of Russian Internet company Mail.ru Group approved a listing of global depositary receipts (GDRs) on the Moscow Exchange. The plan is for Mail.ru Group’s GDRs to begin trading in Moscow by July. There will not be any secondary issuance accompanying the listing. Russian antitrust clears Fortum to buy stake in Uniper On March 2, 2020 it was announced that Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service cleared Finland’s Fortum to acquire a 20.5% stake in Germany’s Uniper.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Inter RAO Group Today | 11
    10 | PJSC Inter RAO | 2016 Annual Report 3. INTER RAO GROUP TODAY The Group operates in the following segments: A leading electricity export and import operator in Rus- — Electricity and heat generation sia. The Inter RAO Group’s supply geography comprises — Electricity supply and heat supply Finland, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Nor- — International electricity trading way, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, South Ossetia, Ka- A diversified energy holding company — Engineering, power equipment export zakhstan, China and Mongolia. managing assets in Russia, as well as — Management of electricity distribution grids outside Russia Effectively manages power supply companies – guaran- in European and CIS countries. teed suppliers in 12 regions of Russia. Since 2010, PJSC Inter RAO has been rated in the List of Strategic Enterprises and Strategic Joint Stock Compa- Owns independent suppliers of electricity to large indus- nies of the Russian Federation1. trial consumers. GENERATING ASSETS SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ELECTRICITY EXPORT in 2016 THERMAL POWER PLANTS 41 17.0bn kWh ELECTRICITY IMPORT HYDROPOWER PLANTS 62 (including 5 low capacity HPPs) 10 in 2016 IN 62 REGIONS OF RUSSIA bn kWh WIND FARMS 3.1 1 According to the Decree of the President of Russia No. 1190 dated 30.09.2010 PJSC Inter RAO was included in the List of Strategic Enterprises and Strategic Joint-Stock Companies (Section 2 of the List of Open Joint Stock Companies with its assets held in federal ownership managed by the Russian Federation in order to ensure strategic 2 interests of State defence and security, moral values, healthcare, rights and legitimate interests protection of the citizens of the Russian Federation).
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest
    An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: • “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail • The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board • Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee • Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies”, while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample • The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors • Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the development of digital technologies continues • The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit • Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent • The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times • Twenty-four percent of companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Candidates Nominated for Election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC and Information on Availability Or
    Information on candidates nominated for election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC and information on availability or absence of their written consent to election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC Status2 Aggregate Membership in the Boards of Directors of Relation to Shareholdi period of other companies ng in the Shareholder(s) Position (at the Candidate’s Candidate’s position and place of membership in Company No. who nominated Date of birth, education moment of I E N at the date of the report Nominated by the affiliates major Consent Full Name employment in the last 5 years1 the Company’s 1 the candidate nomination) candidate counter- Board of parties Directors 2013 – 2013 Director General, JSC Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund; Year of birth: 1973 2013 – 2014 Temporary Chief Pavel Executive Officer of Polyus Gold Higher Sergeyevich International Limited; Director General of Saint Petersburg State PJSC RusHydro Grachev PJSC 2014 – 2016 Chief Executive Officer PJSC Polyus 3 years 10 1 University, Diploma in Legal PJSC Polyus PJSC RusHydro no no no available (as an ROSSETI of Polyus Gold International Limited; Director General of months Studies, Lawyer; independent 2014 – 2016 President, JSC Polyus LLC “MC Polyus” SL Zoloto LLC director) Krasnoyarsk; University of Trieste, major in 2014 – present day Director General Law, J.D. of PJSC Polyus; 2016 – present day Director General of LLC “MC Polyus” 2008 – present day Member of the Year of birth: 1977 Management Board, Endowment Fund The Russian for Support and Development of the Prosperity Fund, Higher: Saint-Petersburg State University; PJSC "Aeroflot" The Prosperity M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT E.ON Russia JSC for 2015
    Pre-approved by Approved by the Board of Directors of the Annual General Meeting E.ON Russia JSC of Shareholders of E.ON Russia JSC 21 April 2016 15 June 2016 (Minutes No. 229) (Minutes No. 16) Chairman of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders ______________ B. Reutersberg ANNUAL REPORT E.ON Russia JSC FOR 2015 Validity of information of the Annual Report is certified by the opinion of the Audit Commission of E.ON Russia JSC No. w/n dated 31 March 2016 CEO ______________ /M.G. SHIROKOV/ 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ..................................................................................... 3 2. ADDRESS OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CEO TO SHAREHOLDERS ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY ............................................................... 6 4. REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON THE COMPANY’S DEVELOPMENT IN ITS PRIORITY AREAS OF ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................... 16 5. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW ............................................................................... 21 6. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ............................................................................................. 30 7. SHARES AND STOCK MARKET ......................................................................................... 49 8. OPERATIONS OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia CFO Route to the Top 2019 Edition
    Financial Officer Russia CFO Route to the Top 2019 edition A changing role for a maturing economy IntroductIon This report provides a fresh overview of Russia’s current serving genera- tion of chief financial officers. Our ongoing data analysis shows that: » 15% of the largest Russian companies changed CFOs in 2018. » The companies under review maintain a tradition of hiring CFOs inter- nally. That said, we observed a slight increase in external hiring in 2018, to a level last seen in 2016. » Those having served as divisional financial directors form the largest cohort of CFOs. » Average tenure continues to decline, to 5.4 years. » ACCA/CFA and MBA qualifications are more evident among the CFO population. » Women hold 20% of CFO positions among the top 100 companies, maintaining a gradual upwards trajectory in representation. » Average total annual compensation is $1.48m. russia cfo route to the top 2019 AGe The average age of CFOs remains stable at 45.3 years. Fast-paced consumer, TMT and financial services sectors tend to hire younger CFOs, closer in age to executives who occupy product and technol- ogy roles in these companies. However, the majority of Russian listed companies operate in the industrial sector, where the average age of CFOs is 46.5, a reflection of a maturing CFO function. Average age of CFOs . . Three-year analysis . . . Average age of CFOs by . . industry sector ▪ 2015 ▪ 2016 ▪ 2017 ▪ 2018 CON FS IND LS TMT The average age of CFOs at FTSE 100 companies is 52. Fortune 500 CFOs average 49.3 years (up from 44 years in 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Q U a R T E R L Y R E P O R T Unipro Public Joint-Stock Company for Q2
    Q U A R T E R L Y R E P O R T Unipro Public Joint-Stock Company Issuer’s code: 65104-D for Q2 2020 Issuer address: Building 34, 23 Energostroiteley Street, Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District – Yugra, Tyumen Region, 628406 Russian Federation The information contained in this Quarterly Report shall be subject to disclosure in accordance with the securities laws of the Russian Federation ____________ M. G. Shirokov General Director of Unipro Public Joint-Stock Company signature Date: 14 August 2020 ____________ A. N. Koblova Chief Accountant of Unipro Public Joint-Stock Company signature Date: 14 August 2020 L. S. Contact: Ekaterina Alexeyevna Giganova, Head of the Corporate Policy Department Telephone: (495) 545-3838 Fax: (495) 545-3839 Email: [email protected] Web page(s) where the information contained in this Quarterly Report is disclosed: www.unipro.energy, http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=7878 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Section I. Information on the Issuer’s Bank Accounts, Auditor (Audit Organisation), Appraiser, Financial Advisor and Signatories of the Quarterly Report ............................................................................................. 6 1.1. Information on the Issuer's
    [Show full text]
  • Segezha Group
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT PUBLIC JOINT STOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION //sistema.com СONTENT 02 SISTEMA SISTEMA PROFILE Sistema overview – 4 / Investment portfolio – 6 / CEO’s statement – 8 / Strategic overview – 10 ABOUT THIS REPORT This annual report was approved by the General Annual Meeting of Sistema PJSFC on 26 June 2021 (Minutes No.1-21, dated 30 June 2021). This annual report presents information on business operations of Sistema Public Joint 14 RESULTSPERFOMANCE Stock Financial Corporation and its portfolio companies in 2020. Key events at the corporation in 2020 and after reporting period – 16 / Financial overview for 2020 – 21 / The annual report of Sistema PJSFC for the year 2020 has been prepared in compliance Shareholders’ equity – 25 / Report on dividends declared (accrued) on Sistema shares – 26 with Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies, Federal Law on Securities Market, Bank of Russia Regulation on Disclosure by Issuers as amended. Unless specifically noted otherwise, all financial performance indicators in this annual report are based on consolidated financial statements under IFRS. Certain immaterial discrepancies in percentage calculations and in arithmetic operations of addition in tables and charts in this annual report are attributable to rounding. You may access other annual reports of the Corporation at its official website, ASSETS www.sistema.com, in Information Disclosure and Investors & Shareholders. 28 KEY ASSETS' PERFOMANCE МТС – 30 / Ozon – 38 / Segezha Group – 44 / Etalon Group – 56 / MEDSI – 64 / Steppe Agroholding – 76 / Binnopharm Group – 84 / JSC BPGC – 90 / Business Nedvizhimost – 98 / Cosmos Hotel Group – 104 / Other assets – 110 / Funds – 122 DISCLAIMER Certain statements in this annual report may contain assumptions or projections 134 GOVERNANCECORPORATE GOVERNANCE regarding forthcoming or expected events related to Sistema PJSFC or its portfolio companies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leading Russian Utilities and Renewables Company
    RusHydro Investor presentation ATON Utilities Day, September 17, 2018 Key figures and facts Key figures 39.0 140 71 >60% 104 11.2 1.0x 68% GW TWh Of Russia’s RUB bn RUB bn net debt/ EBITDA margin of thousand installed hydro LTM EBITDA hydropower Installed electric Total output of FY2017 EBITDA Dividends for employees capacity controlled as of 1H’18 segment in capacity of RusHydro Group in FY2017 paid in 2018 by RusHydro 1H ‘18 RusHydro Group(1) 2017 (1) Group Largest generating company in Russia and one of the largest publicly traded generating company with predominantly hydro assets in the world with installed capacity of 39.0 GW (1) (ca.16% of Russia’s total installed electric capacity) A developing and successful dividend story: 7 consecutive years of increasing dividend payments since 2010; dividend payout in the amount of 50% of net profit in 2016-2017 Focus on the Russian market: implementation of new construction projects, extension of life-time and improving efficiency of existing assets Diversified holding company with hydro and thermal generation assets, alternative renewables, transmission and distribution, retail, R&D and repair assets One of the most liquid generating companies of the Russian stock market: local shares included in Level 1 list on MOEX, DRs listed on the LSE and trading on OTCQX in New York, included in MSCI Russia index. Green utility – one of the world’s largest renewable energy players, a sustainable development leader in Russia (1) Including 3 GW Boguchanskaya hydropower plant, 50/50 JV with UC RUSAL 2
    [Show full text]