Gazprom Energoholding Group Sustainability Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2018 Gazprom Energoholding Group 2019 Sustainability Report PAO Mosenergo | PAO TGС-1 | PAO OGK-2 | PAO MIPC 1 | Overview of the Group Table of Contents 101 102-50 Report Profile 102-46 102-51 This is the fourth sustainability report of Gazprom In this report, PAO Mosenergo, PAO TGC-1, 3 REPORT PROFILE 102-48 102-52 Energoholding Group (Sustainability Report), PAO OGK-2 and PAO MIPC are referred to as Report for the calendar years 2018 and 2019. Mosenergo, TGC-1, OGK-2 and MIPC, respectively. 102-49 102-54 10 STATEMENT FROM THE CEO OF GAZPROM ENERGOHOLDING GROUP 103-1 12 OVERVIEW OF THE GROUP REPORT PREPARATION This Report has been prepared in accordance with As there were no significant changes from 22 BUSINESS MODEL the requirements, recommendations and guidance the previous reporting period in the list of of the GRI Standards, including the sector-specific stakeholders or other relevant business drivers 24 KEY EVENTS ACROSS THE GROUP COMPANIES IN THE REPORTING PERIOD Electric Utility Sector Supplement, and is in and context of Gazprom Energoholding Group, accordance with the GRI Standards: Core option to identify the Report’s material topics, we relied in terms of its level of disclosure. This report also on the previous stakeholder surveys conducted 28 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT highlights the UN Sustainable Development Goals for Gazprom Energoholding Group Sustainability prioritised by Gazprom Energoholding Group. Report 2016–20171. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 46 For a full list of aspects covered by this Report and the relevant page number in the report, please see 56 SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY the GRI Content Index section. ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE 62 REPORT CONTENT AND TOPIC BOUNDARIES 74 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION We have chosen a biennial reporting cycle for the All financials are given as per IFRS consolidated Sustainability Report. This Report focuses mostly financial statements. Non-financial information on the data for two calendar years (2018–2019); on the Group’s subsidiaries and affiliates is not 104 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY however, it also discloses information about the included as its internal corporate data collection more significant corporate events of 2020. frameworks need further refinement. Going forward, the Group plans to gradually extend non- PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY POLICY 112 This Report details the performance of Gazprom financial reporting to include all subsidiaries and Energoholding Group’s three electricity generating affiliates of Mosenergo, TGC-1, OGK-2, and MIPC 124 PHILANTHROPY AND SUPPORT FOR REGIONS OF OPERATION companies, Mosenergo, TGC-1, and OGK-2 [these covered by consolidated financial statements3. companies are listed on the Moscow Exchange], and a heat supply company, MIPC [a non-listed 130 APPENDICES company]2. All data on Mosenergo, TGC-1, OGK-2, and MIPC, except financials, are provided excluding their subsidiaries and affiliates unless stated otherwise. SOURCES OF INFORMATION The key sources of information used to detail The Report presents the Group’s mid-term Gazprom Energoholding Group’s performance and long-term plans. Their implementation in this Report include management reports and is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties audited IFRS financial statements as well as including factors beyond the control of Gazprom the data provided by relevant units of Gazprom Energoholding Group companies. Energoholding Group companies. 1 For more details on the materiality process, a full list of topics and materiality assessment see Appendix 1.1. 2 For the names, legal forms and addresses of the companies covered in this Report see Appendix 1.2. 3 For the full list of subsidiaries and affiliates covered by consolidated financial statements see Appendix 1.3. 2 3 PERFORMANCE 203-1 COMPLETION OF THE CSA G4-DMA 2007-2019 earlier EU8 INVESTMENT PROGRAMME 2007 2019 In 2019, Gazprom Energoholding completed the ambitious Gazprom Energoholding Group companies ensure an uninterrupted construction and upgrade investment programme to build supply of heat and electricity to industrial and residential customers about 9 GW of generating capacity under capacity supply across Russia, including its megacities, Moscow and St Petersburg. agreements (CSA). Our operations place a heavy focus on reliability, safety, energy efficiency and the mitigation of environmental impact. Our key THE CSA INVESTMENT PROGRAMME HAS COVERED: “sustainability priorities that help us address the above tasks include: optimising our generation capacity mix by reducing the load on obsolete and deteriorated capacities of the Group’s generating Denis V. Fyodorov companies, as well as decommissioning and replacing them Head of Directorate, PJSC Gazprom; with new, high-performing power units; CEO, OOO Gazprom Energoholding efficiently using energy resources by optimising our fuel mix, 17 5 8 6 combined cycle steam turbine hydropower gas turbine as well as developing and adopting energy saving technologies; gas turbines (CCGT) units (STU) units units enhancing environmental safety and mitigating the environmental footprint of our power plants. Share of Energy-efficient Units in the Total Installed Capacity 22.4 22.4 22.6 23.3 16.0 16.7 11.5 13.8 5.0 8.1 1.3 3.7 3.8 38.5 38.1 38.8 38.8 38.4 38.8 35.1 35.9 36.0 36.0 37.0 37.3 37.7 Over the past few years, we have achieved 0.5 1,3 1.41.8 3.04.3 5.26.1 6.48.7 8.78.7 9.0 tangible results in these areas, including 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Number of Gazprom Energoholding’s units Energy-efficient units % of energy-efficient units the completion of the CSA investment programme and the commissioning of 2018 2027 new, innovative capacity. For more details on PJSC Gazprom's Power New units have boosted the power plants’ technical, economic and Generation Strategy for 2018–2027 see the Gazprom environmental performance. Gazprom Energoholding Group’s further growth Energoholding Group’s Development Strategy is linked to PJSC Gazprom’s latest 10-year Power Generation Strategy section. (until 2027) approved in June 2018. 4 5 203-1 COMMISSIONING INNOVATIVE REDUCTION IN SRFC SINCE 2012 G4-DMA earlier EU8 NEW CAPACITY NEW CAPACITY COMMISSIONED UNDER THE CSA PROGRAMME STU at Troitskaya GRES 2007 ~ +9.0 GW 2019 Gazprom MW Energoholding 660 THE AVERAGE SPECIFIC REFERENCE FUEL CONSUMPTION (SRFC) FOR has completed ELECTRICITY GENERATION, CALCULATED PROPORTIONALLY, DECREASED BY two projects that STU using circulating fluidised bed (CFB) technology at OGK-2’s Novocherkasskaya are unique for GRES Russia 2012 -10.4 % 2019 330 MW 324.8 g/kWh 290.9 g/kWh 1 3 Emission reduction with With an improved cycle design and steam Gazprom Energoholding Group continues CFB compared to coal parameters raised to the supercritical level, the innovative project to upgrade and replace % firing, mg/cubic metre the STU-660 power unit at Troitskaya GRES the T-250/300-240 steam turbine at Generating demonstrated an increase in efficiency from the Unit 9 of Mosenergo’s CHPP-22 with a new 226.3 28.6 average 33 %–36 % of standard coal-fired units Т-295/335-23.5 model. The four-cylinder T-295 to 41 %, an improved environmental performance turbine was made specifically for the project and g/kWh and a shorter cold start-up time of less than has the capacity of up to 335 MW – the highest 9 hours (compared to 12 hours on average). of all turbines ever manufactured by Ural Turbine SRFC for electricity supply new units accounted FLARING Works. This type of turbine is globally unique for CSA units of the total electricity output OLD CAPACITY in terms of reliability, design and technical parameters. The turbine will become the flagship 2 of a new model range and its widespread use is 0 expected in the grids of cities with more than one SRFC Decrease Rate vs Growth in the Share of Output by CSA Capacity 1,30 The CFB-330 project at the 330 MW STU unit million inhabitants. 0 28.6 of Novocherkasskaya GRES became Russia’s 23.3 26.2 1,00 22.6 first commercial electricity-generating project 16.7 17.3 20.1 with circulating fluidised bed technology and 8.8 11.2 demonstrated significantly lower pollutant 4.4 5.4 emissions as compared to traditional coal firing. 0.2 1.9 300 CFB330 327.1 324.8 324.0 322.0 320.2 318.4 312.1 310.2 The most vivid result of these initiatives is Gazprom 306.0 0 301.3 300.3 0 40 295.0 290.9 50 30 Energoholding Group’s improved technical, economic and environmental performance. 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Particulate SRFC, g/kWh CSA capacity output, % NOx SO2 matter 6 7 EMISSION REDUCTION REDUCTION OF WATER CONSUMPTION AND UNTREATED The decrease in the total amount of pollutant emissions was primarily WASTEWATER DISCHARGE driven by consistent fuel efficiency improvements. By reducing coal as a fuel due to its severe environmental impact as compared to natural gas, we were also able to curtail sulphur dioxide, fly ash and nitrogen % oxide emissions. 2010 2019 40 With heat and electricity output down by only 3 %, GHG and pollutant Reduction of water emissions decreased by 18 % and 58 %, respectively. consumption Efforts to increase water efficiency and reuse treated wastewater in generation % 3 % Generation vs 2007 43 reduction Reduction of water 3 2 2 1 1 discharge of heat and 0 1 0 -2 -1 -1 electricity -3 output -4 REDUCTION OF COAL ASH STORAGE Pollutant Emissions, thousand tonnes 5 Pollutant 0 -14 -19 emissions -33 247 -35 -36 2013 2019 226 -42 -42 reduced -46 -50 -51 -58 174 143 442 457 107 78 93 Reduction in coal ash