DOCSLIB.ORG

And Montenesroll, and to the Order of This Court Application. This

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Montenesroll, and to the Order of This Court Application. This REQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES OF PROTECTION 8UBWITPED 3Y THE GOVERNMEHT OF THE RFPUBLIC OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA To His Excellency the President, to the Judges of the International court of Justice, the undersigned being duly authorized by the Repubaie of r os nia and Her~egovina: 1 have the honor ta refer ta the Application submitted to the Court on 20 March 1993 instituting proceedings by Bosnia and Herzegavina against Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) in the case of the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Rerzesovina v. Yuboslavia (~erbiaand Montenesroll, and to the Order of this court in that case which was dated 8 April 1993, ,, granting provisional measures on our behalf. On behalf of Bosnla and Herzegovina, I hereby request.urgently, in accordance with Article 41 of the Statute of this Court and Articles 73, 74, and 75 of the Rules of Court, that the Court indlcate additional provisional measures of protection immediately, which aught tu be taken Eorthwith to preserve the rights of the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina pnding the detemination of the issues raised by our Application. This extraordinary step is being taken because the Respondent has violated each and everyone of the three measures of protection on behalf of Bosnia and Herzegovina that were indicated bythis Court on 8 April 1993, to the grave detriment of both the People &nd State of Bosnka and Herzegovina. In addition to continuing its campaign of genocide against the Bosnian People-- whether Muslim, Christian, Jew, Croat or Serb--the Respondent is now planning, preparing, conspiring to, proposing, and negotiating the partition, dismemberment, annexation and incorporation of the sovereign state of Bosnia and Herzegovina--a Membes of the United Nations Organization--by means of genocide. After the Court issued its Order in the late afternoon of 8 April 1993, the President of the Court convened a meeting with me and the Acting Agents for the Respondent with the ~egistraref the Court in attendance pursuant to Article 31 of the Rules of Court. At that time, 1 stated quite clearly that in the event the . Respondent continued with its carnpaign of genocide and extermination against the . People and State of Boçnia and Herzegovina, 1 would have no alternative but to return to the Court with another Request for additional provisional measures on behalf of the Applicant and its citizens. If 1 remember correctly, the President of the Court took note of my Statement. For reasons that will be explained in more detail belaw, the time has now corne for me to carry out that cornitment, In the recent past this Court has emphasized that a Request for the indication of provisional measures "rnuçt by its very nature relate to the substance of the case since, as Article 41 [of the Statute] expressly states, their object is to preserve the res'pective rights of either partyw (United States Di~lomaticand Consular Staff in Tehran, Provisional MeasUres, I.C.J. Reports 1979, p. 16, para. 28) : Article 41 1. The Court sha11.' have the power to indicate, if it considers that circumstances so require, anv provisional measures which ought to be taken to preserve the respective rishts of either partv. .... [Emphasis added.] This Request for additional measures of protection is motivated by the desire to have the Court protect the "rightsW of the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Moreover, this Request for additional measures of protection is also motivated by the desire to have the Court protect the very existence of the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina from extermination by means of genocide, partition, dismemberment, annexation and incorporation by the Respondent. Since the Court has the legal power to protect the ggrightsuof Bosnia and Herzegovina, then a fortiori the Court must have the legal power to protect Bosnia and ~erzegovina&self. The sovereign right of the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina to their independent existence as a Member State of the United Nations Organization must certainly be among the "rightsW that the Court can protect under Article 41 of the Statute, which is Ilan integral partw of the'U.N. Charter under article 92 thereof. In essence, 1 am today asking the Court to act under Statute . Article 41 in order to protect the very existence of a State Member of the United Nations which is also a "partyglto a case that is currently pending before the Court from physical mutilation then total annihilation by the other "partytgto that same case. The word "anyu found in Article 41 indicates that the Court has the power to protect Bosnia and Herzegovina by al1 means possible from genocide, extermination, partition, dismemberment, annexation, incorporation, and ultimate destruction. ... A. * Com~ellina Circumstances ~e~uirinathe Indication of Additional Provisional Measures of Interim Protection. 1 hereby incorporate by reference the facts set.forth in Our Application and Request for Provisional Measures of 20 March 1993, as well as al1 subsequent facts submitted to the Court--both orally and in writing--through the closure of oral proceedings.on 2 April . 1993, as well as al1 factual determinations made by this Court in its Order of 8 April 199'3. In particular, 1 wish to draw to the attention of the Court Paragraph 48 of the Court's Order of 8 April 1993, which provides.in relevant part as follows: Il.. whereas from the information available to the Court it is satisfied that there is 'a grave risk of action being taken which may aggravate or extend the existing dispute over the prevention or punishment of the crime of genocide,.orrender it more difficult of solution; ...Il 1 hereby reaffirm and reassert each and every factual allegation and determination that has been set forth during the course of these proceedings as of 8 April 1993. Furthermore, the rapidly escalating human catastrophe in Bosnia and Herzegovina is so enormous, monstrous, and unacceptable that it cannot be adequately described in the Request as of todayfs date. Therefore, Bosnia and Herzegovina respectfully asks the Court to take judicial notice of the facts on the ground as they have developed and been reported by Organs of the United Nations, by foreign governments, and by reputable news media sources from 8 April 1993 up to and including when the Court finally deliberates upon this Request for the indication of additional provisional measures of protection. For the same reasons, 1 must hereby respectfully reserve the right to amend, supplement, or alter, this Request for additional provisional measures at any time. On 8 April 1993 the International Court of Justice issued the following Order of Provisional Measures in this case: n52. For these reasons, The COURT, Indicates, pending its final decision in the pr0ceeding.s instituted on 20 March 1993 by the Republic of Bosnia.and Herzegovina againstthe Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) , the following provisional measures: A. (1) Unanimously, The Governinent of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) should immediately, in pursuance of its undertaking in the Convention on the Prevention L and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide-of 9 December 1948, take al1 measures within its power to prevent' commission of the crime of genocide; (2) By 13 votes to 1, The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) should in particular ensure that any military, paramilitary or irregular armed uriitswhich may be directed or supported by it, as well as any organizations and persons which 'may be subject to its control, direction, or influence, do not commit any acts of genocide, of conspiracy to commit genocide, of direct and public incitement to commit genocide; or of l complicity in genocide, whether directed against the Muslim population of Bosnia and Herzegavina or against any other national, ethnical, racial or religious group; .. B. Unanirnously, The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Çerbia and Nonlenegro) and the Government of the ~epublicof Bosnia and Herzegovina should not take any action and shauld ensure that no action is taken which may aggravate or' extend the existing dispute over the prevention or punishment of the crime of genocide, or render it more difficult of ~olution.~ Pursuant to its own tems, the Court directed that one original copy of its 8 April 1993 Order be transmitted IBtothe Secretary- General of the United Nations for transmission to the ~ecurity Council .qu Nevertheless, the Respondent paid absolutely no attention whatsoever to the Courtfs Order, and irnmediately proceeded to violate each and every one of its provisions, as will be demonstrated below in Section B. Furthemore, pursuant to its campaign of genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Respondent is now proposing their partition, , dismemberment, annexation, and incorporatiop which will constitute the logical culmination and ultimate success of its genocidal plan ta establish a "Greater SerbiaM as explained in our 20 Mrch 1993 .Application and, in particular, Paragraphs 22 through 29, inter alia. If not prevented by this Court, the Respondent plans to annex and incorporate substantial postions of the sovereign territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina and to remove therefrorn al1 People who recognize Bosnian citizenship irrespective of their other affiliations-whether Muslim, Christian, Jew, Serb, Croat--by means of genocide and acts of genocide in violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention and this Court's Order of .8 April 1993. Clearly, the destruction of a sdverelgn nation state by means of genocide by another state must fa11 within the prohibitions of the Genocide convention to which both states are parties, The Respondentfs proposed partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina will be the prelude to the final extinction of our State and the ultimate extermination of our People.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Perspectives
    APRIL 2020, VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1 (19) EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ON EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES International Scientific Journal on European Perspectives EDITOR: Milan Jazbec ASSISTANT EDITOR: Nataša Šuštar B. EDITORIAL BOARD Matej Accetto (Católica Global School of Law, Portugal) • Dennis Blease (University of Cranfield, UK• Vlatko Cvrtila (University of Zagreb, Croatia) • Vladimir Prebilič (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia) • Albert Rakipi (Albanian Institute for International Studies, Albania) • Erwin Schmidl (University of Vienna, Austria) • Vasilka Sancin (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia) • Uroš Svete (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia) • Katja Zajc Kejžar (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia) • Jernej Zupančič (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia) • Mitja Žagar (Institute for Ethnic Studies, Slovenia) • Jelica Štefanović Štambuk (University of Belgrade, Serbia) EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Murat Bilhan (Istanbul Kultur University, Turkey) • Erhard Busek (Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe, Austria) • Mustafa Cerić (University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) • Victor Jackovich (Jackovich International, USA) • Jacques Rupnik (Centre for International Studies and Research, France) • Goran Svila- nović (RCC, Bosnia and Herzegovina) • Savo Kentera (Centre for International Relations, Montenegro) EDITORIAL OFFICE ADDRESS European Perspectives is a peer-reviewed international scientific journal, published twice a year (in April and October) by International Institute for Middle
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction (Program) Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository IBRL Events Institute of Bill of Rights Law 1999 Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction (Program) Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction (Program)" (1999). IBRL Events. 47. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ibrlevents/47 Copyright c 1999 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ibrlevents Conflict and Reconstruction April 9·10, 1999 University Center The College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction April 9-10, 1999. University Center The College of William and Mary • Williamsburg, Virginia For the better part of a decade, news of the Balkan conflict has generated great international concern. The break-up of Yugosla- via and the ongoing friction in Bosnia and Kosovo raise difficult questions about such issues as ethnic cleansing, war criminals, and the treatment of refugees. To address these and other topics, the College of William and Mary will host a conference of distinguished international experts from a variety of fields, including law, economics, journalism, political science, and Foreign service. Their experience in the region will guide us as we examine the complex circumstances Ieadlngup to the present situation, and explore the difficulties involved in the reconstruction of a peaceful society after years of internal conflict. "Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction" is sponsored jointly by the Reves Center for International Studies and the Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the College of William and Mary, and the Council ForAmerica's First Freedom in Richmond, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrencían Chronicle 2015
    LawrencíanDepartment of Slavic Chronicle Languages and Literatures 2015 The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas Editor: Ani Kokobobo Vol. XXVI Layout: Pam LeRow www.ku.edu/~slavic/ Fall, 2015 An Interview with Oleksandra Wallo by Ani Kokobobo Tell us a bit about yourself. When did you come to the U.S.? What are some of your academic and teach- ing interests? I was born and grew up in L’viv—a city in Western Ukraine that played a major role in the Ukrainian cultural revival in the late Soviet era and eventually in the move- ment for Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union. In those early years of independence, I participated in a student exchange program called FLEX (Future Leaders Exchange Program) sponsored by the US State Depart- ment in an effort to build better relationships with the former Soviet republics. This program brought me to the United States for the first time: for ten months I lived with an American host family and studied at a public high school. In many ways, this program determined book project based on my dissertation. I also hope to my future path in life—upon my return to L’viv, I chose have a chance to teach a course on contemporary Slavic to major in English and English-Ukrainian translation at women’s writing sometime in the future. the university, and in the early 2000s I decided to return Besides literature, I also have strong research and to the United States for graduate work in languages and teaching interests in second language studies and Slavic literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Sb ¡20)0 Conseil De L’Europe ^ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ COE273160 ★ ★ ★★ ★
    io') Council of Europe Sb ¡20)0 Conseil de l’Europe ^ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ COE273160 ★ ★ ★★ ★ Strasbourg, 21 June 1996 Restricted Ì <s:\cdISdoc496)NcdI\54.pdg> CDL (96) 54 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES FOR 1995 l "Sii :- ''ferfai 'ACCORDANCE' WITH "sEC,n6NS^lI6C(ìi';AND 5023(b)\OF THE * -.' -0 'Ä. FOREIGN' ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961. AS AMENDED ;•;■ > -V -'•■'ir'-• ; • Î.V.Î-. -:-Ад '•-A.- *.V4 '; : * . * * • *Л • \ »...ísV . .... -V? »V...... > r ' i-m ••. - / •* к .. Iя»»- • •- 'c' *•* ■ •' .4..• * •**,: •*» «' - *.< • •• - • *. • ‘,:1. *.i . _ _ ____ . 2. ............ •.»» i• A.* .d-«kis »M4* . •* ,'•» Y^. T-Vr.Î-Æ4/0Âîi^:UvVi?;»^^4"£:^>«^^ -№'i- ' j: • ’^"Rrintea'f for".tiie:.’use ;of fheixCönïmitfcees; òn *Inter2atio¿ál';,'.Re.Iatíona ¿?r »«£:• ‘i^Eouse. of. Reàresèntànves. 'ani:- Foreign ^Relations •• of. the .U.S.; Senaiijire-J^ ,-. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Republic of Bosnia ana Herzegovina was formed from one of six constituent republics of the^ former Yugoslavia. Citizens endorsed independence in a 1992 ref­ erendum. President Alija Izetbegovic heads the multiethnic collective presidency of a parliamentary democratic government elected in 1990. Within days'of independ­ ence, Serbian nationalist militias, supported by elements of the former Yugoslav na­ tional army (JNA), launched attacks throughout northern and eastern Bosnia, and Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) leader Radovan Karadzic declared the establish ­ ment of the “Republika Sroska ” or “Serb Republic.” Seventy percent of the Bosnian Republic remained under Serbian occupation until the Bosnian government and Croatian offensives in August. During 4 years of war an estimated 263,000 people were killed, and two-thirds of the country's prewar pop­ ulation of 4 Vi million was uprooted and dispersed as either refugees or displaced persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security
    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Legality Vs. Politics
    Stefan A. Riesenfeld Symposium Keynote Address- Securing International Peace: Legality vs. Politics By His Excellency Muhamed Sacirbey, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Mission of Bosnia-Herzegovina to the United Nations* Rapporteur: Ms. Hannah Garry** I. KEYNOTE ADDRESS Good evening. First of all with all of the eminent educated personalities, in view of the recent history in my country and in our region, I am glad to see that there are no psychiatrists in this group. As you know, Mr. Karadic and others have left their legacy on us. But indeed, I am honored to be among such a distinguished group. And lest we don't take ourselves all too seriously, I thought it would be appropriate to start in that direction. Mrs. Riesenfeld, it is my pleasure to be here at this forum. Dean, I think you've moved in the back, and, Professor thank you for the introduction and welcoming me so much. And particularly, I'd like to thank the student organizers. * Upon admittance of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina to the United Nations on May 22, 1992, H.E. Sacirbey was appointed Ambassador and Permanent Representative. In 1995, he served as Foreign Minister of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina for one and a half years where he was a key player in the Dayton Peace talks. Later, in 1996, he resumed his current post as Ambassador and was also named Special Envoy for the Implementation of the Dayton Peace Agreement. He was most recently also appointed as Vice-Chairman of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court.
    [Show full text]
  • A Memorial for Bosnia
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 1994 A Memorial for Bosnia: Framework of Legal Arguments Concerning the Lawfulness of the Maintenance of the United Nations Security Council Arms Embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina Craig M. Scott Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Francis Chang Peter Copeland Jasminka Kalajdzic Source Publication: Michigan Journal of International Law. Volume 16 (1994), p. 1-140. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works Part of the International Law Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Repository Citation Scott, Craig M.; Chang, Francis; Copeland, Peter; and Kalajdzic, Jasminka, "A Memorial for Bosnia: Framework of Legal Arguments Concerning the Lawfulness of the Maintenance of the United Nations Security Council Arms Embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina" (1994). Articles & Book Chapters. 2248. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/2248 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. A MEMORIAL FOR BOSNIA: FRAMEWORK OF LEGAL ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE LAWFULNESS OF THE MAINTENANCE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL'S ARMS EMBARGO ON BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Craig Scott* Abid Qureshi Paul Michell Jasminka Kalajdzic Peter Copeland Francis Chang" INTRODUCTION: LEGAL QUESTIONS AT STAKE AND PREMISES ON WHICH A Memorialfor Bosnia Is BASED ...................... 6 A. Overview of the Legal Questions at Stake ................. 6 B. Situating A Memorial for Bosnia in the Context of the Ongoing Case in the International Court of * Associate Professor of Law, University of Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting Local Project Appraisal
    mm mm Emp<JWf!ff!d lives. Resilient nations. MINUTES OF THE MEETING LOCAL PROJECT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE Project: Increasing resilience of Livno, Mrkonjić Grad and Maglaj Project ID: BHl0/00110813 Summary of the meeting Introduction Mr. Avdić, UNDP BiH Sector Leader for Energy and Environment initiated the meeting by informing all participants of the Local Programme Advisory Committee (LPAC) that Project "Increasing resilience of Livno, Mrkonjić Grad and Maglaj" received Endorsement of the Czech Government. Expected start of the Project is 15 August 2018. Mr. Avdic stressed out that presenting the project activities, methodology and implementation modalities to LPAC, is a formal precondition and underlined the importance of local partners role within this project. Presentation of the Project Document Project budget is EUR 100,000 and anticipated duration is 12 months starting from 15 August 2018 and ending on 14 August 2019. The project would use the Direct Implementation Modality (DIM). The Project Board will be comprised of the following institutions: Ministry of Security of BiH, Civil Protection Directorate/Administration of FBIH, Civil Protection Directorate/Administration of RS, the Czech Republic Humanitarian Aid and UNDP. Project would lean and build on vast and successful UNDP ORR efforts in the local communities. In particular, the project will be closely interlinked with all relevant on-going and planned ORR related projects to secure alignment of results, efficiency, avoid duplication of efforts and ensure contribution to overall strategic direction. Overall objective of the project is to strengthen disaster risk reduction (ORR) capacities at all government levels in BiH and citizens, with focus on vulnerable categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Specified
    S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 221 Casualties: Not specified Narrative of Events: 416. Despite Monday's dispatch of UN troops from Croatia to take control of the Sarajevo airport, Sarajevo itself remained volatile as sporadic fighting continued throughout the city. Serbian forces were reported to have withdrawn from the Sarajevo airfield, and they were also reported to have taken their large artillery weapons with them. Muslim forces had likewise been persuaded to reduce their fire in the airport area. 446/ 417. One hundred twenty-five French marines arrived at the airport and 1,000 members of the Canadian Mechanized Infantry and 80 armoured vehicles were scheduled to arrive on 2 July. These Canadian infantry forces were scheduled to be replaced within three weeks by combined UN peace-keeping forces from France, the Ukraine and Egypt. 447/ (b) Local reported events 418. The first UN relief supplies reached Sarajevo airport and local relief workers distributed 15 tons of food to 1,500 Muslim refugees and food and medical supplies also reached Koševo Hospital. 448/ (c) International reported events 419. US Defense Secretary, Richard B. Cheney, stated that the Bush administration was prepared to commit air and naval combat forces to escort and protect relief convoys into Sarajevo. 449/ 2. 2/7/92 (Thursday) (a) Military Activity Combat and Shelling Activity: BiH and Serbian forces continued to exchange artillery fire around the airport. Source(s): Agence France Presse. Targets Hit: Not specified Description of Damage: Not specified Sniping Activity: Not specified Casualties: Not specified Narrative of Events: 420. Following a series of delays that kept a Canadian mechanized infantry battalion stranded for three days on its 250 mile journey from Croatia, the Canadian battalion, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Michel Jones, fought its way through a Serb roadblock 74 miles north-west of Sarajevo and deployed 40 of its 80 armoured vehicles around the perimeter of the Sarajevo airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural Aspects So Far, Only Questions of Substance In
    Articles / Chronicle 3. The law: procedural aspects (use of force only in self-defence) announcement, made at a joint Moscow news So far, only questions of substance in seem to have been 'stretched' to the ut- conference with Russian Foreign Minister testing the NATO ultimatums against most. Now, resolution 836 is arranged Andrei Kozyrev was, however, greeted with mixed feelings both from the Bosnian Muslims the background of Security Council in such a way that UNPROFOR may and the UN, due to the fact that the agreement resolution 836 have been dealt with. be supported in the performance of its was negotiated without participation of the UN. There remains a question of procedure task by air power. This implies the pos- The commitment was widely regarded as a to be answered. Resolution 836 says in sibility of supporting peacekeeping. major success of Russia's diplomatic efforts to mediate peace in Bosnia. To the surprise of its paragraph 10 that 'the necessary From a theoretical, doctrinal point of Radovan Karadzic, Russian Foreign Minister measures' may be taken 'under the view then the question whether the air Andrei Kozyrev showed support for the UN air authority of the Security Council and support itself would remain within the strikes during the talks and expressed concerns subject to close coordination with the limits of peacekeeping or should be about the breach of the no-flight zone by Secretary-General and UNPROFOR'. considered enforcement action is Bosnian Serbs (SZ 2 Mar, p. 4; WP 2 Mar, p. A20). And in paragraph 11 the member indeed interesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Trial Judgement Summary for Radovan Karadžić
    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER United Nations (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) Nations Unies The Hague, 24 March 2016 Trial Judgement Summary for Radovan Karadžić International Please find below the summary of the Judgement read out today by Judge O-Gon Criminal Tribunal for the former Kwon. Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal The Accused was a founding member of the SDS and served as its President from July International pour 1990 to July 1996. He was the President of the National Security Council of the Serbian l’ex-Yougoslavie Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and on 12 May 1992, the Accused was elected as the President of the Presidency of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. From 17 December 1992, he was the sole President of Republika Srpska, and the Supreme Commander of the armed forces of Republika Srpska. The Accused stood trial for 11 Counts; two Counts of genocide, five Counts of crimes against humanity, (namely persecution, murder, extermination, deportation, and forcible transfer), and four Counts of violations of the laws or customs of war (namely murder, acts of violence the primary purpose of which was to spread terror among the civilian population, unlawful attacks on civilians, and the taking of hostages. In the Indictment, the Prosecution alleged that the Accused participated in four joint criminal enterprises (―JCEs‖). The Prosecution alleged the following: From at least October 1991 to 30 November 1995, the Accused participated in a JCE, the objective of which was to permanently
    [Show full text]