DOCSLIB.ORG

NIBR Engelsk 2007-20:Nibr Eng 11 Mm Rygg 11-12-07 11:32 Side 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NIBR Engelsk 2007-20:Nibr Eng 11 Mm Rygg 11-12-07 11:32 Side 2 NIBR engelsk 2007-20:nibr eng 11 mm rygg 11-12-07 11:32 Side 2 NIBR Report 2007:20 NIBR Report 2007:20 Holm-H Jørn Holm-Hansen, Aadne Aasland and Larisa S. Malik a nsen/A a Health and Social affairs sl a n d /M in Norway and Russia a lik The cooperation evaluated Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research He (NIBR) is an interdisciplinary, a social science sentre for urban lth and regional research. The Institute a has a national responsibility to n pursue social science research on d environmental issues and works Soci internationally in the field of urban and regional research in an Other research areas concern Norwegian Institute a environmental and developmental cultural difference and conflict, for Urban and l Aff perspective. necessary conditions for sustainable Regional Research development on national and P.O. Box 44, Blindern a NIBR carries out studies and international basis, and studies N-0313 OSLO irs in Norw factfinding work for the related to development cooperation Telephone: +47 22 95 88 00 Research Council of Norway in developing countries. Telefax: +47 22 60 77 74 and other clients, primarily e-mail: [email protected] central and local government NIBR has sixtyfive researchers administrations, in the areas of: who are qualified in the fields An institute in the • Public administration of sociology, political science, Environmental Research a y • Governance and democracy economy, demography, Alliance of Norway a • Planning architecture, civil engeneering and n • Welfare and living conditions d land-use planning. A large proportion R • Regional analysis of NIBR´s researchers have PHDs and u • Population and private professorial level qualifications ssi sector studies and expertise. a Health and Social Affairs in Norway and Russia tjorn-20_ny.pdf 1 23-01-08 08:32:01 Other publications from NIBR in English: NIBR Report 2005:16 The Transferability of Policy Instruments How environmental policy instruments strike roots in Russia and Latvia NIBR Report 2005:4 The Foster Familily Project in Murmansk A review of SOS Children’s Villages Norway’s foster family project in Murmansk region NIBR Report 2003:1 Orphans in Russia Policies for family-like alternatives You can order the report from NIBR at the cost of NOK 250,- pluss postage. NIBR P.O.Box 44, Blindern N-0313 Oslo Phone: +47 22 95 88 00 Fax +47 22 60 77 74 e-mail [email protected] tjorn-20_ny.pdf 2 23-01-08 08:32:01 Jørn Holm-Hansen, Aadne Aasland and Larisa S. Malik Health and Social Affairs in Norway and Russia The cooperation evaluated NIBR Report 2007:20 tjorn-20_ny.pdf 3 23-01-08 08:32:01 Title: Health and Social Affairs in Norway and Russia The cooperation evaluated. Author: Jørn Holm-Hansen, Aadne Aasland and Larisa S. Malik NIBR Report: 2007:20 ISSN: 1502-9794 ISBN: 978-82-7071-705-7 Project number: O-2507 Project name: Helse Russland Financial supporter: Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services Head of project: Jørn Holm-Hansen Abstract: This report evaluates the Cooperation Programme on Health and Related Social Issues in the Barents Region and under the Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Wellbeing 2002 – 2006. The overall picture of the programme operation is positive. Many projects run into the same type of problems related to misunderstanding the Russian context. Each project deals with the problems on their own, learning how to cope individually and the hard way. Summary: English and Norwegian Date: December 2007 Pages: 206 Price: NOK 250,- Publisher:: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research Gaustadalléen 21, Box 44 Blindern 0313 OSLO Telephone (+47) 22 95 88 00 Telefax (+47) 22 60 77 74 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.nibr.no Printed by: Nordberg A.S. Org. no. NO 970205284 MVA © NIBR 2007 tjorn-20_ny.pdf 4 23-01-08 08:32:01 1 Preface This report evaluates the cooperation between Norway and Russia on health and social affairs, more precisely the Cooperation Programme on Health and Related Social Issues in the Barents Region and the Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Wellbeing. The evaluation was commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry for Health and Care Services, and was carried out within a framework of seven man-weeks. Field visits were made to Northern Norway, Murmansk, Arkhangelsk, Petrozavodsk and Petersburg. The research was done by a team of researchers, two of them from the Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (Oslo), and one from the Pomor State University (Arkhangelsk). The team was headed by Jørn Holm-Hansen. Jørn Holm-Hansen wrote chapters 1, 3, 4, 5, 6.5,.6.6, 7 and the appendices of the report. Aadne Aasland was in charge of the electronic survey and wrote chapter 2. Larisa S. Malik wrote most of chapter 6. The project team was assisted by Aleksandra Wacko, Renate Schau Holm-Hansen and Marina Nore. The team would like to thank all interviewees for sharing their time, information and insights. Also the respondents of the electronical survey deserve thanks.Thanks to Inger Balberg, who has contributed to the technical editing of this report. Oslo, December 2007 Arne Tesli, Research Director NIBR Report 2007:20 2 Table of Contents Preface ..................................................................................................1 Tables....................................................................................................4 Figures ..................................................................................................5 Summary...............................................................................................7 1 Introduction.................................................................................10 2 Programme portfolio and a web-based survey............................13 2.1.1 Distribution of respondents............................................15 2.1.2 Programme portfolio ......................................................17 3 Results achieved..........................................................................39 3.1 What is a result?.............................................................39 3.2 What is the intervention logic? ......................................40 3.3 What are the results? ......................................................40 3.4 Conclusion .....................................................................42 4 Four case studies.........................................................................43 4.1 Case: The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH)............................................................................43 4.1.1 Presentation of individual projects and project packages.........................................................................48 4.1.2 Summing up ...................................................................54 4.2 Case: Psychiatry Tromsø................................................55 4.2.1 Presentation of the single projects..................................56 4.2.2 Summing up ...................................................................58 4.3 Case: Bergen municipality – Public Health Authority...60 4.3.1 Summing up ...................................................................64 4.4 Case: New Beginning and the Norwegian Saami Mission...........................................................................65 4.5 Presentation of single projects .......................................66 4.6 Summing up ...................................................................68 4.7 Conclusion .....................................................................69 5 Project leaders’ suggestions for programme improvement.........72 5.1 Experiences with the system of project grants...............72 NIBR Report 2007:20 3 5.2 Russian and Norwegian project leaders on the potential improvement of their own activities................75 5.3 The view of Russian regional authorities.......................75 6 Developments in Russia and future priorities .............................77 6.1 The state of Russian health ............................................77 6.2 The quality of life...........................................................78 6.3 National priority programmes ........................................80 6.4 Demographical policy and child welfare .......................81 6.5 Other relevant developments..........................................83 6.6 Conclusions – current challenges...................................84 7 Conclusions and recommendations.............................................87 7.1 Conclusions....................................................................87 7.2 Recommendations..........................................................92 Appendix 1 Intervention logic and results of all projects under the programme ...............................................................98 Appendix 2 List of interviewees......................................................165 Appendix 3 Project address list .......................................................169 NIBR Report 2007:20 4 Tables Table 2.1 Survey respondents by country ......................................15 Table 2.2 Survey respondents by age group ..................................16 Table 2.3 Survey respondents by role in the project ......................16 Table 2.4 Year of start-up of projects ............................................17 Table 2.5 What kind of organisation do/did you represent in the collaboration project?...........................................19 Table 2.6 Planned duration of projects...........................................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industrialization of Housing Construction As a Tool for Sustainable Settlement and Rural Areas Development
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 07010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016407010 TPACEE-2019 Industrialization of housing construction as a tool for sustainable settlement and rural areas development Olga Popova1,*, Polina Antufieva1 , Vladimir Grebenshchikov2 and Mariya Balmashnova2 1Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Severnaya Dvina Emb., 17, Arkhangelsk, Russia 2 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26, Yaroslavskoeshosse, 129337, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The development of the construction industry, conducting construction in accordance with standard projects, and transforming the construction materials industry in hard-to-reach and sparsely populated areas will make significant progress in solving the housing problem. Industrialization of housing construction is a catalyst for strong growth of the region’s economy and the quality of life of citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of industrialization of the territory’s construction complex and its development potential for increasing the volume of low-rise housing stock. Research tasks: 1) assessment of the need to develop housing construction, including low-rise housing, on a particular territory; 2) development of a methodology for calculating the level of industrialization of construction in the area under consideration to determine the possibility of developing low-rise housing construction in this area in the proposed way; 3) approbation of the method using the example of rural areas of the Arkhangelsk region. It was revealed that the districts of the Arkhangelsk region have medium and low levels of industrialization. The districts that are most in need of an increase in the rate of housing construction have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
    Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkangelin Ja Lapin Läänien Kouluhallintojen Yhteistyön Kehittäminen
    Lapin yliopiston kasvatustieteellisiä raportteja 6 Arkangelin ja Lapin läänien kouluhallintojen yhteistyön kehittäminen Kartoitus toisen ja korkea•asteen koulutuspalveluista Kyösti Kurtakko Käännös: Julia Sergeeva Kansi ja taitto: Katja Norvapalo Jakelu: Lapin yliopisto / Julkaisut PL 122 96101 Rovaniemi www.ulapland.fi Lapin yliopistopaino Rovaniemi 2008 ISSN 1796•3877 ISBN 978•952•484•213•6 Arkangelin ja Lapin läänien kouluhallintojen yhteistyön kehittäminen Kartoitus toisen ja korkea•asteen koulutuspalveluista SISÄLTÖ 1. JOHDANTO......................................................................................................... 1 2. ARKANGELIN ALUE ........................................................................................ 3 2.1. ARKANGELIN LÄÄNI........................................................................................... 3 2.2. ARKANGELIN KAUPUNKI .................................................................................... 8 3. VENÄJÄN KOULUTUSJÄRJESTELMÄ......................................................... 9 3.1. YLEISTÄ ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. TOISEN ASTEEN KOULUTUS .............................................................................. 11 3.3. AMMATILLINEN KOULUTUS.............................................................................. 15 3.4. VENÄJÄN KORKEAKOULUJÄRJESTELMÄ ............................................................ 16 4. ARKANGELIN LÄÄNIN KOULUTUSTARJONTA.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial North.Pdf
    RISK AND SAFETY INDUSTRIAL NORTH NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENT Risk and Safety Industrial North Nuclear Technologies and Environment Moscow 2004 The Industrial North. Nuclear Technologies and Environment. — Moscow, «Komtechprint» Publishing House, 2004, 40 p. ISBN 5-89107-053-7 The edition addresses specialists of the legislative /executive authorities and those of local government of the north-west region; activists of public environmental movements; and teachers and students of higher educa- tion institutes as well as all those who are interested in the problems of stable development of the Russian North. This document is prepared by the Nuclear Safety Institute (IBRAE RAS) under work sponsored by the United States Department of Energy. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof including the U.S. Department of Energy and any and all employees of the U.S. Government, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use- fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific entity, product, process, or service by name, trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not neces- sarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. ISBN 5-89107-053-7 Ó IBRAE RAS, 2004 Ó«Komtechprint», 2004 (Design) INTRODUCTION Industrialization of the majority of Russian regions took part of the brochure is dedicated to the forecast, preven- place during an era when environmental safety was not tion and mitigation of nuclear/radiological emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation As a Factor of the Regional Development: Raising Questions (The Case of the Arkhangelsk Region)  © Igor V
    Arctic and North. 2018. No. 31 22 UDC [316.7:33](470.11)(045) DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.31.28 Establishing the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation as a factor of the regional development: raising questions (the case of the Arkhangelsk region) © Igor V. KATORIN, research fellow Tel.: +7-8182-21-89-39. E-mail: [email protected] Northern (Arctic) federal university named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia Abstract. The article describes the impact of the Russian Arctic policy activation on the development of the Arkhangelsk region. In 2013, the formation of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) as an object of state administration was launched. The Arkhangelsk region was partly included in the Russian Arctic. Now, we observe the establishment of the regulatory field and the organizational framework of the macroregion. The article analyzes the current stage of this process in the Russian Arctic. The author high- lights the main opportunities and risks for the region associated with the activation of the Arctic policy of the country. The most serious opportunities are emerging in politics (the Arctic status, external relations and external image) and economy (infrastructure, investments, new enterprises and organizations, and tourism). These areas are experiencing some changes. The changes in the social space are hardly noticeable but, in this area, cardinal changes are possible. They are associated with the renewal of the regional image, strengthening the regional identity, changes in the social composition of the population and the potential of municipalities. At the same time, risks associated with incomplete entry of the Arkhangelsk region into the Russian Arctic, the implementation of major investment projects and inefficient management.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Nuclear Power Development Chronology
    Russia Nuclear Power Development Chronology 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998-1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 Last update: January 2008 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2004 16 January 2004 GOSATOMNADZOR EXTENDS NPP SERVICE LIVES On 16 January 2004, Interfax reported that Rosenergoatom had received a license from Gosatomnadzor to extend the service life of Bilibino NPP Unit 1 for a year. In 2001-2002, licenses were issued to extend the service lives of Novovoronezh NPP Units 3 and 4, and in 2003 a similar license was issued to Unit 1 at Kola NPP. As of January 2004, work was under way to upgrade the equipment at Leningrad NPP Unit 1 and Kola NPP Unit 2. Requests to extend the service lives of both units will be submitted to Gosatomnadzor in 2004. -"Gosatomnadzor prodlil ekspluatatsiyu 1-go bloka Bilibinskoy AES na god," Interfax, 16 January 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Working Papers
    NORDIC WORKING PAPERS Bioeconomy in Northwest Russian region Forest- and waste-based bioeconomy in the Arkhangelsk region, Russia Anna Berlina and Alexey Trubin http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/NA2018-904 NA2018:904 ISSN 2311-0562 This working paper has been published with financial support from the Nordic Council of Ministers. However, the contents of this working paper do not necessarily reflect the views, policies or recommendations of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordisk Council of Ministers – Ved Stranden 18 – 1061 Copenhagen K – www.norden.org Forest‐ and waste‐based bioeconomy in the Arkhangelsk region, Russia Working Paper By Anna Berlina and Alexey Trubin, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 2 General description of the Arkhangelsk region ........................................................................... 3 3 Forest resources and their management ................................................................................... 4 4 Waste resources and their management .................................................................................... 7 5 Bioenergy production ............................................................................................................... 10 6 Support framework for bioeconomy in the Arkhangelsk region ................................................ 11 7 Key actors involved in the bioeconomic activities in the Arkhangelsk region ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN DISTRICTS AWARD LIST" (Last Update 01.07.2012)
    "RUSSIAN DISTRICTS AWARD LIST" (Last update 01.07.2012) Republic of Adygeya (AD) UA6Y CITIES AD-01 MAIKOP AD-02 ADYGEJSK AREAS AD-03 GIAGINSKY AREA AD-04 KOSHEHABL'SKY AREA AD-05 KRASNOGVARDEJSKY AREA AD-06 MAJKOPSKY AREA AD-07 TAHTAMUKAJSKY AREA AD-08 TEUCHEZHSKY AREA AD-09 SHOVGENOVSKY AREA Altaysky Kraj (AL) UA9Y BARNAUL AREAS AL-01 ZHELEZNODOROZHNY AL-02 INDUSTRIALNY AL-03 LENINSKY AL-04 OKTJABR`SKY AL-05 CENTRALNY CITIES AL-06 deleted AL-07 deleted AL-08 RUBTSOVSK AL-09 SLAVGOROD AL-10 YAROVOE AREAS AL-11 ALEJSKY AREA AL-12 ALTAYSKY AREA AL-13 BAEVSKY AREA AL-14 BIJSKY AREA AL-15 BLAGOVESHCHENSKY AREA AL-16 BURLINSKY AREA AL-17 BYSTROISTOKSKY AREA AL-18 VOLCHIHINSKY AREA AL-19 EGOR'EVSKY AREA AL-20 EL'TSOVSKY AREA AL-21 ZAV'JALOVSKY AREA AL-22 ZALESOVSKY AREA AL-23 ZARINSKY AREA AL-24 ZMEINOGORSKY AREA AL-25 ZONALNY AREA AL-26 KALMANSKY AREA AL-27 KAMENSKY AREA AL-28 KLJUCHEVSKY AREA AL-29 KOSIHINSKY AREA AL-30 KRASNOGORSKY AREA AL-31 KRASNOSHCHEKOVSKY AREA AL-32 KRUTIHINSKY AREA AL-33 KULUNDINSKY AREA AL-34 KUR'INSKY AREA AL-35 KYTMANOVSKY AREA AL-36 LOKTEVSKY AREA AL-37 MAMONTOVSKY AREA AL-38 MIHAJLOVSKY AREA AL-39 NEMETSKY NATIONAL AREA AL-40 NOVICHIHINSKY AREA AL-41 PAVLOVSKY AREA AL-42 PANKRUSHIHINSKY AREA AL-43 PERVOMAJSKY AREA AL-44 PETROPAVLOVSKY AREA AL-45 POSPELIHINSKY AREA AL-46 REBRIHINSKY AREA AL-47 RODINSKY AREA AL-48 ROMANOVSKY AREA AL-49 RUBTSOVSKY AREA AL-50 SLAVGORODSKY AREA AL-51 SMOLENSKY AREA AL-52 SOVIETSKY AREA AL-53 SOLONESHENSKY AREA AL-54 SOLTONSKY AREA AL-55 SUETSKY AREA AL-56 TABUNSKY AREA AL-57 TAL'MENSKY
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Quality and Health State of Population in the Arkhangelsk Oblast
    Drinking water quality and health state of population in the Arkhangelsk Oblast Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk; Rospotrebnadzor Directorate in the Arkhangelsk Oblast, Arkhangelsk; Bobun I.I., Buzinov R.V., Unguryanu T.N., Gudkov A.B. Today chemical and biological contamination of drinking water from surface sources takes one of the leading places among the factors causing health problems among population. This happens due to steady growth of water consumption, qualitative changes in water sources, which suffer from practically uncontrolled anthropogenic impact, and also because the existing water treatment methods are inappropriate in fighting against the strongest representatives of virus micro flora. Traditional practice for water treatment does not guarantee its high quality and absolute safety for people’s health any more. It is a well-known fact that the influence of water resources on the health and life conditions of people is determined by availability of sufficient and safe household and drinking water supply, sanitary arrangement of inhabited settlements, as well as by the climatic conditions in the region. One of the most unfavorable areas in Russia in terms of supplying good quality drinking water to population is the Arkhangelsk Oblast. Here the parameters of chemical and biological contamination of drinking water in the water supply network 2.5 times exceed the average Russian figures. (According to Rospotrebnadzor in the Arkhangelsk Oblast in 2009 in the Arkhangelsk Oblast the number of drinking water samples which did not meet the existing hygienic norms for sanitary and chemical parameters was 42.2 %, for microbiological parameters – 10.1 %). The main reason for unsatisfactory quality of drinking water in the cities of the Arkhangelsk Oblast is still high percentage (70–90%) of equipment depreciation and disrepair of water supply networks, thus causing frequents breakdowns.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Water Security Issues in Russia II: Water Security in General Population of Russian Arctic, Siberia and Far East, 2000Á2011
    æORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Food and water security issues in Russia II: Water security in general population of Russian Arctic, Siberia and Far East, 2000Á2011 Alexey A. Dudarev1*, Eugenia V. Dushkina1, Yuliya N. Sladkova1, Pavel R. Alloyarov1, Valery S. Chupakhin1, Vitaliy M. Dorofeyev2, Tatjana A. Kolesnikova1, Kirill B. Fridman1, Birgitta Evengard3,4 and Lena M. Nilsson4,5 1Northwest Public Health Research Center, St. Petersburg, Russia; 2Dubna City Hospital, Moscow Oblast, Russia; 3Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umea˚ University, Umea˚ , Sweden; 4Arcum, Arctic Research Centre at Umea˚ University, Umea˚ , Sweden; 5Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Nutritional Research, Umea˚ University, Umea˚ , Sweden Background. Poor state of water supply systems, shortage of water purification facilities and disinfection systems, low quality of drinking water generally in Russia and particularly in the regions of the Russian Arctic, Siberia and Far East have been defined in the literature. However, no standard protocol of water security assessment has been used in the majority of studies. Study design and methods. Uniform water security indicators collected from Russian official statistical sources for the period 2000Á2011 were used for comparison for 18 selected regions in the Russian Arctic, Siberia and Far East. The following indicators of water security were analyzed: water consumption, chemical and biological contamination of water reservoirs of Categories I and II of water sources (centralized Á underground and surface, and non-centralized) and of drinking water. Results. Water consumption in selected regions fluctuated from 125 to 340 L/person/day. Centralized water sources (both underground and surface sources) are highly contaminated by chemicals (up to 40Á80%) and biological agents (up to 55% in some regions), mainly due to surface water sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Dioxin and Furan Releases and Their Risk Assessment on the Population Health in Some Regions of the Russian Federation”
    Annual Meeting of NATO/CCMS Pilot Study on Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors June 12-16, 2005 in Ottawa, Canada “Dioxin and Furan Releases and their Risk Assessment on the Population Health in some regions of the Russian Federation” Sergey Tikhonov Director of the Centre for International Projects, Moscow, Russian Federation Academician of the Russian Environmental Academy 1 I. INTRODUCTION • Centre for International Projects activity (2001-2004) in the framework of Project “Reduction/Elimination of Dioxin and Furan emissions in the Russian Federation with Focus on the Arctic and Northern Regions Impacting the Arctic” (Arctic Council Action Programme) jointly with Professor Y. A. Treger and Doctor V. N. Rozanov. • Chair of the Steering Group of this Project is the representative of Sweden. Financing of the Project was provided by US EPA and Swedish EPA. •“Russian Statistical Year-Books, 2001-2003”, “Industry of Russia, 2002-2003”, “The State Report on Environment Condition and Protection in the Russian Federation in 2001-2003”, the monography “Dioxins in Russia” (2001), “UNEP Standardized Toolkit for Identification and Quantification of Dioxin and Furan Releases” (2001-draft, 2003-first issue), information from the Committees for Natural Resources of Arkhangelsk, Murmansk regions, the Republic of Komi. • Evaluation only dioxin releases into atmosphere. • Dioxin supply with sewage, solid wastes and products has not been considered in the presentation. • Experimental data was carried out by Russian Research and Development Centre for Emergency Situations of the Ministry of Health having relevant international intercalibration and accreditation of the State Standard of Russia. • The estimation of risk for population health has been carried out by the Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology and Professional Pathology of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]