Satoyama 4 Printed in Canada © 2012 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All Rights Reserved

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Satoyama 4 Printed in Canada © 2012 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All Rights Reserved Satoyama 4 Printed in Canada © 2012 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All rights reserved Layout: Em Dash Design 100% Recycled Supporting responsible use of forest resources Cert no. SGS-COC-003939 www.fsc.org Printed on Rolland Enviro100 Print, which contains 100% post-consumer fibre, is Environmental ©1996 Forest Stewardship Council Choice, Processed Chlorine Free, and manufactured in Canada by Cascades using biogas energy. Table of Contents Ahmed djoghlAf irinA BoKovA mASAru oniShi United Nations Assistant Secretary General; Director-General, United Nations Educational, President, Japan Airlines .......................... 31 Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Scientific and Cultural Organization ............ 20 thomAS lovejoY Diversity ................................................. 2 helen clArK Chief biodiversity adviser to the President BAn Ki-moon Administrator, United Nations Development of the World Bank; Senior advisor to the Secretary-General, United Nations ................ 3 Programme; Former Prime Minister of president of the United Nations Foundation; Achim Steiner New Zealand ......................................... 21 President of the Heinz Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment ................ 32 United Nations Under-Secretary General; KAnayo f. nwAnze Executive Director, United Nations President, International Fund for Agricultural SArA oldfield Environment Programme ............................ 4 Development ......................................... 22 Secretary General, Botanic Gardens YoShihiKo nodA luc gnAcAdjA Conservation International ....................... 33 Prime Minister of Japan ............................. 5 Executive Secretary, United Nations jeffreY A. mcneelY jAmeS Alix michel Convention to Combat Desertification ......... 24 Senior Science Advisor, International Union for Conservation of Nature ........................ 34 President of the Republic of Seychelles .......... 6 juliA mArton-lefèvre john heritY lee hong-Koo Director General, International Union for Conservation of Nature ............................ 25 Former Director, Biodiversity Convention Chairman of the Korean Organizing Office, Environment Canada ..................... 35 Committee for the 2012 IUCN World mAurice Strong Conservation Congress; Former Prime Former Executive Director, United Nations wen liAn ting Minister, Republic of Korea .......................... 7 Environment Programme .......................... 27 Ambassador, Permanent Representative felipe cAlderón liz dowdeSwell of Malaysia to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations .............. 36 President of Mexico .................................. 8 President and Chief Executive Officer, veit KoeSter jeAn chAreSt Council of Canadian Academies; Former Executive Director, United Nations External professor, Roskilde University; Premier ministre du Québec, Canada ............. 9 Environment Programme .......................... 28 Visiting Professor, United Nations BriAn mulroneY KlAuS töpfer University—Institute of Advanced Studies ..... 38 Former Prime Minister of Canada ............... 10 Former Executive Director, United Nations Nay htun gro hArlem BrundtlAnd Environment Programme .......................... 29 Research Professor, Stony Brook University, Former Prime Minister of Norway; PatricK weiten State University of New York; Former Former Director-General, World Health Deputy Executive Director, United Nations President of the Moselle General Council, Organization .......................................... 11 Environment Programme .......................... 39 France ................................................. 30 li gAnjie Vice Minister, Ministry of Environmental Protection, People’s Republic of China ......... 12 cAroline SpelmAn Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom ............... 13 gérAld tremBlay Maire de Montréal, Canada ....................... 14 luciAno ducci Mayor of Curitiba, Brazil ........................... 16 monique BArBut Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Global Environment Facility ....................... 17 michel jArrAud Secretary-General, World Meteorological Organization; UN-Water Chair-Elect ............. 19 Satoyama 4 1 Ahmed Djoghlaf, United Nations Assistant Secretary General; Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Diversity Fulfilling our promise to our children, and to all the children of the world wenty years ago, at the United to the sustainable development question. well-defined, universally-accepted tar- Nations Conference on Environment The Convention on Biological Diversity is gets that are now accepted as the basis T and Development—the “Earth one of the main pillars of our future. for policies that protect biodiversity at Summit”, held in June 1992 in Rio de Of the 500 or so environmental con- local, national and global levels. With its Janeiro, the United Nations Convention ventions, the CBD is a unique multilat- Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, its Kuala on Biological Diversity (CBD) was opened eral environment treaty at the service of Lumpur Nagoya Supplementary Protocol for signature. It represented the strong the sustainable development agenda. It is on Liability and Redress, as well as the commitment of the international commu- first of all, a Rio Convention, thus incor- Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit- nity at the highest political level to save porating the principles of the Rio Decla- Sharing, it now has the tools needed to the diversity of life and build the founda- ration into a legally binding instrument. realise its three mutually supportive objec- tions for sustainable development. It has three mutually supportive objec- tives while contributing to the success- Ten years ago, in 2002, the World Sum- tives, namely conservation of biological ful implementation of the two other Rio mit on Sustainable Development was con- diversity, the sustainable use of biolog- Conventions, namely the United Nations vened in Johannesburg to review progress ical diversity, and the access to genetic Framework Convention on Climate Change made and to map out a way ahead towards resources and the fair and equitable shar- and the United Nations Convention to achieving the goal of sustainable devel- ing of the benefit arising for their utilisa- Combat Desertification. opment. In both the WEHAB concept and tion. It promotes the ecosystem approach Achieving the Aichi Targets by 2020 in the 2010 Biodiversity Target, biodiver- to protecting life on Earth and puts the is an obligatory first step if we are to ful- sity was recognised as one of the key well-being of mankind at the heart of its fill the longer-term 2050 vision adopted Achieving the Aichi Targets by 2020 is an obligatory first step if we are to fulfill the longer-term 2050 vision adopted in Nagoya of a world where ‘biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people.’ © Claude Hamel elements for sustainable development, processes. It has 193 Parties and has in Nagoya of a world where “biodiversity with the full implementation of the CBD succeeded in forging a strategic partner- is valued, conserved, restored and wise- being seen as a sine qua non of realisa- ship with all major stakeholders including ly used, maintaining ecosystem services, tion of this future vision. local authorities, mayors, parliamentari- sustaining a healthy planet and delivering In June 2012 world leaders will once ans, business, indigenous people, non- benefits essential for all people.” again assemble in Rio de Janeiro at the governmental organizations, youth, and Achieving the 20 Aichi Targets calls “Rio+20” meeting to look at the global insti- the scientific community. for their urgent integration at nation- tutional order that underpins sustainable Indeed, this Convention, also known al and local levels through the revision development, and to look at the founda- as the Convention for Life on Earth, has of National Biodiversity Strategies and tions of the Green Economy. Biodiversity come a long way since its inception in Action Plans. Thanks to the leadership of represents the natural capital upon which 1992. It has come from being an idea with Japan, the Secretariat in 2011organized, the green economy is built. The Convention, the promise of protecting biodiversity and through the Japan Biodiversity Fund, 12 as one of the legacies of the 1992 Earth contributing to sustainable development, regional and sub-regional workshops and Summit, is one of the institutional responses to a well-developed legal instrument, with assisted 175 Parties to translate the Aichi 2 Satoyama 4 Targets into national biodiversity frame- diversity of life on this planet and recognise and need to be successfully implemented works. The challenge facing the biodiversity the intimate relationship between human by all Parties and their partners as soon as family is to ensure the successful imple- communities and the ecosystems in which possible, and no later than 2020. mentation at national and local levels of they live and thrive. It is one of our tools As world leaders gather in Rio de Janeiro the new generation of National Strategies in the struggle against the impacts of cli- to re-design a new road map to achieving and Action Plans. mate change. It is a unique agreed bio- sustainable development, I call upon all Indeed, the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity diversity
Recommended publications
  • UNU-IAS Policy Report
    UNU-IAS Policy Report Cities, Biodiversity and Governance: Perspectives and Challenges of the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity at the City Level The United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) is a global think tank whose mission is “to advance knowledge and promote learning for policy-making to meet the challenges of sustainable development”. UNU-IAS undertakes research and postgraduate education to identify and address strategic issues of concern for all humankind, for governments, decision-makers, and particularly, for developing countries. Established in 1996, the Institute convenes expertise from disciplines such as economics, law, social and natural sciences to better understand and contribute creative solutions to pressing global concerns, with research and programmatic activities related to current debates on sustainable development: . Biodiplomacy Initiative . Ecosystem Services Assessment . Satoyama Initiative . Sustainable Development Governance . Education for Sustainable Development . Marine Governance . Traditional Knowledge Initiative . Science and Technology for Sustainable Societies . Sustainable Urban Futures UNU-IAS, based in Yokohama, Japan, has two International Operating Units: the Operating Unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa (OUIK) in Japan, and the Traditional Knowledge Initiative (TKI) in Australia. UNU-IAS Policy Report Cities, Biodiversity and Governance: Perspectives and Challenges of the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity at the City Level Jose Antonio
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama – a Place for Preservation of Biodiversity and Environmental Education T
    Satoyama – A place for preservation of biodiversity and environmental education T. Miyaura Satoyama – Ein Ort für die Erhaltung der Biodiversität und für die Umwelterziehung 1 Satoyama landscape fication. Regardless, a place where people and nature have coexisted for long periods of time can be termed a satoya- “Satoyama” is a Japanese word (BROWN and YOKOHARI, ma. In other words, a satoyama is a place of sustainable 2003). “Sato” means village, and “yama” literally means ecosystem management, and many countries have a histo- “mountain”, however in combination with “sato” it has the ry of satoyama. Of course, natural environments differ from meaning of “forest (utilized by humans)”. Thus, even if place to place, and forest types will also differ. These differ- such a forest is situated on a flat land in this context we call ences affect life styles and cultures of human populations in- it “yama”, a “forest near a village”. habiting diverse regions, including the ways in which nat- Satoyama is a place where human beings have long coex- ural environments are utilized. The form of satoyama in isted with nature. Before the wide availability of fossile each region of the planet reflects the diversities of nature fuels, people in many countries obtained a variety of re- and culture as well as regional human history. sources like firewood, brush wood, fallen leaves, nuts, and Figure 1 shows the Tanakami village landscape near game from forests around their villages. During the long Ryukoku University’s Seta Campus (Japan). Seta Campus is history of mankind, local cultures with ways of life that al- located to the south of Lake Biwa, the largest lake in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama Landscapes and Their Change in a River Basin Context: Lessons for Sustainability
    Issues in Social Science ISSN 2329-521X 2016, Vol. 5, No. 1 Satoyama Landscapes and Their Change in A River Basin context: Lessons for Sustainability Shamik Chakraborty (Corresponding author) Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (IAS), United Nations University 5-53-70 Jingumae, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8925, Japan Tel: 81-3-5467-1212 E-mail: [email protected] Abhik Chakraborty Center for Tourism Research, Wakayama University 930 Sakaedani, Wakayama city, Wakayama, 649-8441, Japan Tel: 81-73-456-7025 Email: [email protected] Received: March 10, 2017 Accepted: April 6, 2017 Published: June 14, 2017 doi:10.5296/iss.v5i1.10892 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/iss.v5i1.10892 Abstract 'Satoyama' denotes a mosaic of different landscape-types that has sustained agrarian societies for millennia in Japan. These landscapes have undergone degradation during the past few decades. While satoyama is a consistently referred term in landscape management in Japan, little attention is given to how such landscapes undergo change in large spatial units such as river basins. This study, based on documents and interviews, reviews how watershed level changes affect the functioning of such socioecological systems in the Kuma River Basin in Kyushu. Watershed properties of the Kuma River Basin changed during pre-modern and modern times and each phase left a lasting legacy on the landscape. The article analyzes how ecological connectivity became fragmented by identifying changes in ecosystem services, and concludes that while socio-ecological landscapes have a long history of human use; the human component cannot outgrow the fundamental biophysical processes that maintain ecosystem services and system resilience; these systems can undergo swift and irreversible degradation when ecological connectivity is fragmented.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Analysis of Effectiveness of REDD+ for Forest Communities and Shifting Cultivation, Based on Lessons Learnt from Conservation Efforts in Laos and Thailand
    FINAL REPORT for APN PROJECT Project Reference Number: EBLU2012-02NMY(R)-Takeuchi Critical Analysis of Effectiveness of REDD+ for Forest Communities and Shifting Cultivation, based on Lessons Learnt from Conservation Efforts in Laos and Thailand - Making a Difference – Sciientiifiic Capaciity Buildiing & Enhancement for Sustaiinablle Devellopment iin Devellopiing Countries The following collaborators worked on this project: Prof. Kazuhiko Takeuchi, UNU-ISP, Japan, [email protected] Mr. Luohui Liang, UNU-ISP, Japan, [email protected] Dr. Jintana Kawasaki, IGES, Japan, [email protected] Mr. Oroth Sengtaheuanghoung, NAFRI, Laos, [email protected] Dr. Narit Yimyam, CMU, Thailand, [email protected] Prof. Krishna Gopal Saxena, JNU, India, [email protected] Dr. Shimako Takahashi, UNU-ISP, Japan, [email protected] Ms Alva Lim, Seeds of Life, Timor-Leste, [email protected] National Agriculture and Forestry Critical Analysis of Effectiveness of REDD+ for Forest Communities and Shifting Cultivation, based on Lessons Learnt from Conservation Efforts in Laos and Thailand Project Reference Number: EBLU2012-02NMY®-Takeuchi Final Report submitted to APN ©Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK OVERVIEW OF PROJECT WORK AND OUTCOMES 1. Introduction and background Covering about 30 percent of the world’s land area, forests are home to around 300 million people around the world, including many indigenous people. More than 1.6 billion people depend, to varying degrees, on forests for their livelihoods, e.g. fuelwood, timber, medicinal plants, forest foods, income and fodder, and for their cultural and spiritual identify. Forests sustain critical environmental services such as conservation of biodiversity, water and soil, and climate regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rural Revitalization Scheme in Japan Utilizing Biochar and Eco
    McGreevy and Shibata, Annals of Environmental Science / 2010, Vol 4, 11-22 A RURAL REVITALIZATION sumers. The potential economic, social, and ecologi- cal impact of the Kameoka project are evaluated and SCHEME IN JAPAN UTILIZING the need for biochar projects to drive multifunctional BIOCHAR AND ECO-BRANDING: socio-economic structural change are stressed. THE CARBON MINUS PROJECT, Keywords: biochar, rural revitalization, eco-branding, KAMEOKA CITY COOL VEGE™, socio-economic change Steven R. McGreevy 1* and Akira Shibata 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Kyoto University, Graduate School of Agriculture, Department of Natural Resource Economics, Kyoto In 2007, the world’s urban population officially City, Sakyouku, Kitashirakawa Oimachi 611-8502, became larger than its rural population [1]. This event Japan opens a new chapter in human history and unleashes a 2 Ritsumeikan University, Regional Information flurry of questions regarding the continued inter- Center, Kyoto City, Kita-ku, Kitamachi, 56-1 Toji-in change of resources between urban and rural centers 603-8577, Japan and the overall sustainability of cities and their rural counterparts. Rural areas traditionally have supplied Received August 2, 2010; in final form October 20, critical resources (food, building materials, energy, 2010; accepted October 29, 2010. etc.) and provided numerous ecosystem services that make life in urban areas possible. This unidirectional flow of natural and human capital has left many rural areas the world over either over-exploited and ABSTRACT ecologically degraded or defunct and marginalized. Rural poverty is epidemic- of the 1.2 billion people Like rural areas in many countries, Japanese rural living on less than a US dollar per day, three-fourths society is experiencing decline in all spheres reside in rural areas [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review Vol.1 002 003 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review Vol.1 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review Vol.1
    Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 002 003 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 I Citation UNU-IAS and IGES (eds.) 2015, Enhancing knowledge for better management of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS) (Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1), United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Tokyo. © United Nations University ISBN (Hardcopy) 978-92-808-4561-7 ISBN (eBook) 978-92-808-4562-4 Editorial team Suneetha M. Subramanian Kaoru Ichikawa Ayako Kawai Editorial secretariat Ikuko Matsumoto Caecilia Manago William Dunbar Cover photo credits Top left: Ecosystem Conservation Society-Japan Second from bottom: Susanne Kopf Satoyama Initiative The Satoyama Initiative is a global effort, first proposed jointly by the United Nations University and the Ministry of the Environment of Japan (MOEJ), to realize “societies in harmony with nature” and contribute to biodiversity conservation through the revitalization and sustainable management of “socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes” (SEPLS). The United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS) serves as the Secretariat of IPSI, an international partnership of organizations working to realize the vision of the Satoyama Initiative. UNU-IAS The United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS) is a leading research and teaching institute based in Tokyo, Japan. Its mission is to advance efforts towards a more sustainable future, through policy-relevant research and capacity development focused on sustainability and its social, economic and environmental dimensions. UNU- IAS serves the international community, making valuable and innovative contributions to high-level policymaking and debates within the UN system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of the Satoyama Initiative and Challenges and Ways And
    Global Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative “Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being” TheThe ConceptConcept ofof thethe SatoyamaSatoyama InitiativeInitiative andand ChallengesChallenges andand WaysWays andand MeansMeans toto SupportSupport SocioSocio--ecologicalecological ProductionProduction LandscapesLandscapes Prof. Kazuhiko Takeuchi Vice Rector, United Nations University 29 January 2010 UNESCO, Paris, France “Biocultural Landscapes” and “Socio-ecological Production Landscapes” Biocultural landscapes “Landscape formed as a blend of natural processes and human culture, which mutually affect each other.” Socio-ecological Production Landscapes Propose to integrate elements of biodiversity, for example, “Dynamic mosaics of managed socio-ecological systems that maintain biodiversity and produce a bundle of ecosystem services for human well-being.“ “Satoyama and satoumi landscapes” is defined as “Dynamic mosaics of managed socio-ecological systems that produce a bundle of ecosystem services for human well-being." (Japan SGA, 2010) 2 Challenges facing socio-ecological production landscapes Industrialization, urbanization, population increase and decrease, technological advancement, climate change Weakening of traditional organizational system, Economic difficulties, Loss of traditional / indigenous knowledge, Nearsighted policy Lack of awareness • Conversion of land use (expansion of cultivated fields, etc) • Unsustainable logging, and plantation • Switch from multiple-cropping to mono-cropping systems • Introduction of new crop species, such
    [Show full text]
  • For Peatland Restoration
    “Peatland Monitoring” for Peatland Restoration Prof. Mitsuru Osaki: Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University President of Japanese Peatland Society Collaborated among Hokkaido University- JICA- Indonesia Institutions Main Project Sites ・JSPS Core University Program (1997-2006): Environmental Conservation and Land Use Management of Wetland Mega Rice Project of Peatland Ecosystem in Southeast Asia • inCentral Central Kalimantan, Kalimantan, Indonesia Indoneshia ・JST-JICA Project (SATREPS) (2008-2014): Wild Fire and Carbon Management in Peat-Forest in Indonesia • Peatland area in Mega Rice Project site ・JICA Project as follow-up of SATREPS (2015-2016): Formulation of a Manual and Trial Calculation of GHG Emission from Peatland in Central Kalimantan DF BC UD F Various Study Topics: ・GHG Flux (CO2, CH4, N2O) measuring ・Fire Detection and Protection CO2 observation towers at ・ Water Table Monitoring and Management UDF:(Un-drained Peat) ・Peatland Ecology ・Soluble Carbon Monitoring DF:(Drained Peat ) ・Peatland Subsidence Monitoring BC:(Burnet Peat) ©18/01/ 2016 Tropical Peatland Ecosystems Editors: Osaki, Mitsuru, Tsuji, Nobuyuki (Eds.) Parts: 9 Chapters: 41 Pages: 651 Authors: 160 PANDUAN PENDUGAAN GUIDEBOOK FOR ESTIM ATING EMISI KARBON DARI LAHAN CARBON EMISSIONS FROM GAMBUT TROPIS DI TROPICAL PEATLANDS INDONESIA IN INDONESIA Pedoman Pendugaan Emisi Karbon dari Gambut Tropis di Indonesia | 1 G id b k f C b E i i f T i l P tl d i I d i | 1 Manual of Tropical Peatland Management Data Collection Peatland Maps Remote Sensing Data Set
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar: a Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate
    Reference for authors V2 Section 3: Biomass pyrolysis ........................................... 5 Chapter 10 (Frederik Ronsse et al.): Biochar Biochar: A regional Supply production ............................................................. 6 Chain Approach in View of Chapter 11 (Byungho Song et al.): Pyrolysis Climate Change Mitigation application of biomass char ................................... 6 Chapter 12 (Basak Uzun et al.): Pyrolysis: A sustainable way from Waste to Energy ................. 6 Book outline and short descriptions of Chapter 13 (Maliwan Haruthaithanasan et al.): The registered contributions, Reference for role of biochar production for sustainable authors development in Thailand, Laos and Cambodia ...... 6 Section 4: Biochar-Soil Interactions ................................ 6 Chapter 14 (Gerhard Soja et al.): Biochar applications to agricultural soils in temperate climate – more than carbon sequestration? ......... 7 Table of contents Chapter 15 (Deborah Page-Dumroese et al.): Opportunities and Uses of Biochar on Forest Sites Purpose of this document .......................................... 1 in North America ................................................... 7 Preparation of the manuscript (this will be updated in Chapter 16 (Ibrahim Ortas et al.): Role of further versions of this document) ............................. 2 mycorrhiza and biochar on plant growth and soil The book in a nutshell ................................................ 2 quality ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama 3 Printed in Canada © 2011 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All Rights Reserved
    Living in harmony with nature Satoyama 3 Printed in Canada © 2011 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All rights reserved Design: Em Dash Design 100% Recycled Supporting responsible use of forest resources Cert no. SGS-COC-003939 www.fsc.org Printed on Rolland Enviro100 Print, which contains 100% post-consumer fibre, is Environmental ©1996 Forest Stewardship Council Choice, Processed Chlorine Free, and manufactured in Canada by Cascades using biogas energy. Satoyama 3 Table of Contents Ahmed djoghlAf Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Diversity ....................... 2 BAn Ki-moon Secretary-General, United Nations ................................................. 3 Achim Steiner ShA zuKAng Under-Secretary-General, United Nations and Executive Director, United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic United Nations Environment Programme.......................................... 3 and Social Affairs .....................................................................20 SAtSuKi edA irinA BoKovA Minister of the Environment, Japan ................................................ 4 Director-General, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization .................................................................21 PAul KAgAme President of the Republic of Rwanda .............................................. 6 dr. joAn cloS Executive Director, UN-Habitat .....................................................22 Benigno S. Aquino iii President of the Philippines ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Satochi-Satoyama Conservation and Sustainable
    Preamble Living in harmony with nature, building vibrant communities In the Jomon Era, the Japanese Archipelago was covered with virgin forests and wetlands, where people’s lives were integrated with hunting and fishing. With the introduction of agricultural civilization, they converted the wetlands into paddies and built ditches and irrigation ponds. Harvested for firewood, charcoal and fertilizer, the dark primeval forests were transformed into open, light-filled woodlands. Grasslands and fields were created through grazing and grass harvesting. Over 3,000 years of such human-nature relationships, Satochi-satoyama areas have been formed and maintained, where people have enjoyed the blessings of nature in a sustainable manner, with cyclic use of natural resources around the villages. Satochi-satoyama, created by such human activities, have played a role in enriching the biological environment of the archipelago. In the Japanese Archipelago, a number of flora and fauna inhabit not only in remnants of wilderness in deep mountains but also around human settlements. Among these species, while the global warming after the last glacier period had shifted deciduous broadleaf forests to evergreen broadleaf forests, some species had found their safe sites in man-made open habitats in Satochi-satoyama woodlands and survived there. Such plant and animal species of Satochi-satoyama, represented by the Gifu butterfly and the Japanese faun lily, have been found around people and used as the motifs for haiku poetry and traditional drawing since ancient times. As described in some school songs, such as “Furusato” and “Haru-no-ogawa”, the classic Satochi-satoyama landscape symbolizes the image of the indigenous landscape that can be shared among the Japanese people and gives the basis of their spirit and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama-Like Landscapes in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative Concept Information Paper Satoyama-like Landscapes in the Asia-Pacific Region This paper is a synthesis of the summaries provided by government representatives and experts on the characteristics of satoyama-like landscapes in their countries as well as the information contained in the brochure “The Satoyama Initiative”(published in March 2009 by Ministry of the Environment, Japan) in regard to Japanese satoyama landscape. The special characteristics and significance that may generally be considered common to these landscapes had been set down in the discussion papers of the International Expert Meeting on International Satoyama Initiative Concept held on 25 July 2009; the discussion paper was shared with the government representative and the experts when they prepared the summary. The summaries provided also carry information on the benefits of these landscapes for biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Summary papers were submitted by an expert from China and by government representatives from Cambodia, the Cook Islands, India, Indonesia, Iran, Republic of Korea, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam, on the occasion of the Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative Concept held from 1 to 3 October, 2009. The objectives of the workshop were to: - review the management features of satoyama-like landscapes in the Asia-Pacific region and their benefits for biodiversity conservation and human well-being, and - to discuss strategic elements of the vision and perspectives of the Satoyama Initiative. 1. Characteristics (1) Structure The adaptation of human beings to their local environment while making the best use of the available natural resources is one of the main forces behind satoyama-like landscapes.
    [Show full text]