Satoyama 3 Printed in Canada © 2011 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All Rights Reserved

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Satoyama 3 Printed in Canada © 2011 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All Rights Reserved Living in harmony with nature Satoyama 3 Printed in Canada © 2011 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity All rights reserved Design: Em Dash Design 100% Recycled Supporting responsible use of forest resources Cert no. SGS-COC-003939 www.fsc.org Printed on Rolland Enviro100 Print, which contains 100% post-consumer fibre, is Environmental ©1996 Forest Stewardship Council Choice, Processed Chlorine Free, and manufactured in Canada by Cascades using biogas energy. Satoyama 3 Table of Contents Ahmed djoghlAf Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Diversity ....................... 2 BAn Ki-moon Secretary-General, United Nations ................................................. 3 Achim Steiner ShA zuKAng Under-Secretary-General, United Nations and Executive Director, United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic United Nations Environment Programme.......................................... 3 and Social Affairs .....................................................................20 SAtSuKi edA irinA BoKovA Minister of the Environment, Japan ................................................ 4 Director-General, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization .................................................................21 PAul KAgAme President of the Republic of Rwanda .............................................. 6 dr. joAn cloS Executive Director, UN-Habitat .....................................................22 Benigno S. Aquino iii President of the Philippines ......................................................... 7 Brice lAlonde Executive Coordinator, Secretariat for the United Nations feliPe cAlderón hinojoSA Conference on Sustainable Development ........................................24 Presidente de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos ................................... 9 luc gnAcAdjA joSé mAnuel BArroSo Executive Secretary, United Nations Convention to President of the European Commission ..........................................10 Combat Desertification ..............................................................25 jAnuSz zAleSKi chriStiAnA figuereS Undersecretary of State, Chief Nature Conservator, Ministry of the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention Environment, Poland .................................................................11 on Climate Change ...................................................................26 norBert röttgen m S SwAminAthAn Federal Environment Minister, Germany ..........................................12 M S Swaminathan Research Foundation .........................................28 nAthAlie KoSciuSKo-morizet KiShore rAo Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports Director, World Heritage Centre ....................................................33 et du Logement, France .............................................................13 AnAdA tiégA henK BleKer Secretary General, Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ..........................34 Minister for Agriculture and Foreign Trade, Netherlands ......................14 chArleS mcneill dAto Sri douglAS uggAh emBAS Senior Policy Advisor, Environment and Energy Group, United President of Seventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties .............15 Nations Development Programme .................................................35 Yoo Young-SooK Takashi KAwAmurA Minister of Environment, Republic of Korea .....................................17 Mayor of the City of Nagoya, Japan ...............................................36 jASen meSic´ luciAno ducci Minister of Culture, Republic of Croatia ..........................................18 Mayor of Curitiba, Brazil ............................................................38 monique BArBut hélène mAndroux CEO and Chairperson, Global Environment Facility ............................19 Le Maire de la Ville de Montpellier, France .......................................39 Satoyama 3 1 Ahmed Djoghlaf, Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Diversity You cannot protect what you don’t know well-being. As a result, we continue to special efforts to reduce the pressures lead lives marked by unsustainable faced by coral reefs. consumption patterns that disregard the But governments also recognized biodiversity upon which our prosperity is the importance of public awareness in based. Because you cannot protect what ensuring that this vision comes to frui- you don’t know and you cannot value tion. At the initiative of Japan and building what you ignore, the worldwide celebra- on the tremendous success of the 2010 tion in 2010 of the International Year of International Year of Biodiversity, the UN Biodiversity has been an outstanding General Assembly declared 2011-2020 the success in addressing this gap. United Nations Decade on Biodiversity. At the historic Nagoya Biodiversity The Decade is not only a vehicle to Summit last October, world leaders took support the implementation of the 2011- the first political steps towards a life in 2020 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and harmony with nature. They agreed to the the achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity he third edition of the Global 2011-2020 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity Targets: it is a worldwide celebration of Biodiversity Outlook 3 confirmed with its set of 20 headline targets, known everything we stand to lose by doing T that biodiversity continues to be as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. nothing and everything we stand to gain lost globally at rates so advanced that The Aichi Targets are organized under by changing our ways. many ecosystems, including coral reefs, five strategic goals: addressing the under- Over the course of the Decade, biodi- oceans and the Amazon, could enter a lying causes of biodiversity loss, reducing versity must be mainstreamed throughout self-perpetuating spiral of degradation the pressures on biodiversity, safeguard- government and all sectors of society and quickly become much less rich and ing biodiversity at all levels, enhancing through communication, education and diverse. the benefits provided by biodiversity, and awareness-raising, appropriate incentive Despite the warning signs of this providing for capacity-building. Among measures, and institutional change. By potentially irreversible change, far too the targets, governments have agreed to 2020, citizens and governments without many people across the world remain at least halve and, where feasible, bring exception should be firmly committed to unaware of the ongoing loss of life on close to zero the rate of loss of natural the preservation of our biological heritage. Earth. This is in large part because the habitats including forests; protect 17% Launch events for the Decade have majority of the public and policymakers of terrestrial and inland water areas and already taken place around the world: in are ignorant of the irreplaceable contribu- 10% of marine and coastal areas; restore Africa, Asia and the Pacific, Southeast tions that biodiversity makes to human at least 15% of degraded areas; and make Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, with a global launch set for the end of the year in Japan. Each of these events has helped to both build and reinforce a coalition of agencies, organizations and actors in support of the Decade. At the start of this historic event, United Nations Agencies, regional economic commissions, national governments, local authorities and cities and the general public are making the commitments to building a sustainable future. And indeed we cannot afford to let this opportunity slip by: we must work together more closely than ever during this critical period to build on the outcomes of Nagoya for our mutual benefit and the benefit of all life on Earth. 2 Satoyama 3 Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Message for the United Nations Decade on Biodiversity onserving the planet’s species and land is polluted beyond all use? habitats is central to sustainable We have all heard of the web of life. We C development. Yet the global risk trapping ourselves in a web of death. decline in biodiversity is accelerating. The The United Nations Decade on Biodiversity main causes are human activities. is an opportunity to reverse this trend. The consequences are devastating: Under the theme “living in harmony with been seen as an endless reserve, instead failed crops, economic losses, less resil- nature”, the Decade has several objectives. of the limited and fragile resource we now ience in the face of disaster. As with most It aims to help us look at the underlying know it to be. emergencies, those hardest hit are the causes of biodiversity loss. It seeks to But it is not too late to protect biodiver- poor. And climate change is compounding ensure that biodiversity figures more promi- sity so that future generations can enjoy the problem. nently in decision-making by governments the goods and services it provides. There are also the opportunity costs: and industry. And it hopes to mobilize all The coming decade can be a turning what cures for disease… what other use- segments of society in achieving agreed point in how humanity values and man- ful discoveries, might we never know of international biodiversity targets. ages biodiversity. Together, we can build because a habitat is destroyed forever, or For too long, our natural capital has the foundations for a sustainable future. Achim Steiner, Under-Secretary-General, United Nations and Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme Defining the future of life on Earth he UN Decade
Recommended publications
  • UNU-IAS Policy Report
    UNU-IAS Policy Report Cities, Biodiversity and Governance: Perspectives and Challenges of the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity at the City Level The United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) is a global think tank whose mission is “to advance knowledge and promote learning for policy-making to meet the challenges of sustainable development”. UNU-IAS undertakes research and postgraduate education to identify and address strategic issues of concern for all humankind, for governments, decision-makers, and particularly, for developing countries. Established in 1996, the Institute convenes expertise from disciplines such as economics, law, social and natural sciences to better understand and contribute creative solutions to pressing global concerns, with research and programmatic activities related to current debates on sustainable development: . Biodiplomacy Initiative . Ecosystem Services Assessment . Satoyama Initiative . Sustainable Development Governance . Education for Sustainable Development . Marine Governance . Traditional Knowledge Initiative . Science and Technology for Sustainable Societies . Sustainable Urban Futures UNU-IAS, based in Yokohama, Japan, has two International Operating Units: the Operating Unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa (OUIK) in Japan, and the Traditional Knowledge Initiative (TKI) in Australia. UNU-IAS Policy Report Cities, Biodiversity and Governance: Perspectives and Challenges of the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity at the City Level Jose Antonio
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama – a Place for Preservation of Biodiversity and Environmental Education T
    Satoyama – A place for preservation of biodiversity and environmental education T. Miyaura Satoyama – Ein Ort für die Erhaltung der Biodiversität und für die Umwelterziehung 1 Satoyama landscape fication. Regardless, a place where people and nature have coexisted for long periods of time can be termed a satoya- “Satoyama” is a Japanese word (BROWN and YOKOHARI, ma. In other words, a satoyama is a place of sustainable 2003). “Sato” means village, and “yama” literally means ecosystem management, and many countries have a histo- “mountain”, however in combination with “sato” it has the ry of satoyama. Of course, natural environments differ from meaning of “forest (utilized by humans)”. Thus, even if place to place, and forest types will also differ. These differ- such a forest is situated on a flat land in this context we call ences affect life styles and cultures of human populations in- it “yama”, a “forest near a village”. habiting diverse regions, including the ways in which nat- Satoyama is a place where human beings have long coex- ural environments are utilized. The form of satoyama in isted with nature. Before the wide availability of fossile each region of the planet reflects the diversities of nature fuels, people in many countries obtained a variety of re- and culture as well as regional human history. sources like firewood, brush wood, fallen leaves, nuts, and Figure 1 shows the Tanakami village landscape near game from forests around their villages. During the long Ryukoku University’s Seta Campus (Japan). Seta Campus is history of mankind, local cultures with ways of life that al- located to the south of Lake Biwa, the largest lake in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama Landscapes and Their Change in a River Basin Context: Lessons for Sustainability
    Issues in Social Science ISSN 2329-521X 2016, Vol. 5, No. 1 Satoyama Landscapes and Their Change in A River Basin context: Lessons for Sustainability Shamik Chakraborty (Corresponding author) Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (IAS), United Nations University 5-53-70 Jingumae, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-8925, Japan Tel: 81-3-5467-1212 E-mail: [email protected] Abhik Chakraborty Center for Tourism Research, Wakayama University 930 Sakaedani, Wakayama city, Wakayama, 649-8441, Japan Tel: 81-73-456-7025 Email: [email protected] Received: March 10, 2017 Accepted: April 6, 2017 Published: June 14, 2017 doi:10.5296/iss.v5i1.10892 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/iss.v5i1.10892 Abstract 'Satoyama' denotes a mosaic of different landscape-types that has sustained agrarian societies for millennia in Japan. These landscapes have undergone degradation during the past few decades. While satoyama is a consistently referred term in landscape management in Japan, little attention is given to how such landscapes undergo change in large spatial units such as river basins. This study, based on documents and interviews, reviews how watershed level changes affect the functioning of such socioecological systems in the Kuma River Basin in Kyushu. Watershed properties of the Kuma River Basin changed during pre-modern and modern times and each phase left a lasting legacy on the landscape. The article analyzes how ecological connectivity became fragmented by identifying changes in ecosystem services, and concludes that while socio-ecological landscapes have a long history of human use; the human component cannot outgrow the fundamental biophysical processes that maintain ecosystem services and system resilience; these systems can undergo swift and irreversible degradation when ecological connectivity is fragmented.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Analysis of Effectiveness of REDD+ for Forest Communities and Shifting Cultivation, Based on Lessons Learnt from Conservation Efforts in Laos and Thailand
    FINAL REPORT for APN PROJECT Project Reference Number: EBLU2012-02NMY(R)-Takeuchi Critical Analysis of Effectiveness of REDD+ for Forest Communities and Shifting Cultivation, based on Lessons Learnt from Conservation Efforts in Laos and Thailand - Making a Difference – Sciientiifiic Capaciity Buildiing & Enhancement for Sustaiinablle Devellopment iin Devellopiing Countries The following collaborators worked on this project: Prof. Kazuhiko Takeuchi, UNU-ISP, Japan, [email protected] Mr. Luohui Liang, UNU-ISP, Japan, [email protected] Dr. Jintana Kawasaki, IGES, Japan, [email protected] Mr. Oroth Sengtaheuanghoung, NAFRI, Laos, [email protected] Dr. Narit Yimyam, CMU, Thailand, [email protected] Prof. Krishna Gopal Saxena, JNU, India, [email protected] Dr. Shimako Takahashi, UNU-ISP, Japan, [email protected] Ms Alva Lim, Seeds of Life, Timor-Leste, [email protected] National Agriculture and Forestry Critical Analysis of Effectiveness of REDD+ for Forest Communities and Shifting Cultivation, based on Lessons Learnt from Conservation Efforts in Laos and Thailand Project Reference Number: EBLU2012-02NMY®-Takeuchi Final Report submitted to APN ©Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK OVERVIEW OF PROJECT WORK AND OUTCOMES 1. Introduction and background Covering about 30 percent of the world’s land area, forests are home to around 300 million people around the world, including many indigenous people. More than 1.6 billion people depend, to varying degrees, on forests for their livelihoods, e.g. fuelwood, timber, medicinal plants, forest foods, income and fodder, and for their cultural and spiritual identify. Forests sustain critical environmental services such as conservation of biodiversity, water and soil, and climate regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rural Revitalization Scheme in Japan Utilizing Biochar and Eco
    McGreevy and Shibata, Annals of Environmental Science / 2010, Vol 4, 11-22 A RURAL REVITALIZATION sumers. The potential economic, social, and ecologi- cal impact of the Kameoka project are evaluated and SCHEME IN JAPAN UTILIZING the need for biochar projects to drive multifunctional BIOCHAR AND ECO-BRANDING: socio-economic structural change are stressed. THE CARBON MINUS PROJECT, Keywords: biochar, rural revitalization, eco-branding, KAMEOKA CITY COOL VEGE™, socio-economic change Steven R. McGreevy 1* and Akira Shibata 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Kyoto University, Graduate School of Agriculture, Department of Natural Resource Economics, Kyoto In 2007, the world’s urban population officially City, Sakyouku, Kitashirakawa Oimachi 611-8502, became larger than its rural population [1]. This event Japan opens a new chapter in human history and unleashes a 2 Ritsumeikan University, Regional Information flurry of questions regarding the continued inter- Center, Kyoto City, Kita-ku, Kitamachi, 56-1 Toji-in change of resources between urban and rural centers 603-8577, Japan and the overall sustainability of cities and their rural counterparts. Rural areas traditionally have supplied Received August 2, 2010; in final form October 20, critical resources (food, building materials, energy, 2010; accepted October 29, 2010. etc.) and provided numerous ecosystem services that make life in urban areas possible. This unidirectional flow of natural and human capital has left many rural areas the world over either over-exploited and ABSTRACT ecologically degraded or defunct and marginalized. Rural poverty is epidemic- of the 1.2 billion people Like rural areas in many countries, Japanese rural living on less than a US dollar per day, three-fourths society is experiencing decline in all spheres reside in rural areas [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review Vol.1 002 003 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review Vol.1 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review Vol.1
    Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 002 003 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 I Citation UNU-IAS and IGES (eds.) 2015, Enhancing knowledge for better management of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS) (Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1), United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Tokyo. © United Nations University ISBN (Hardcopy) 978-92-808-4561-7 ISBN (eBook) 978-92-808-4562-4 Editorial team Suneetha M. Subramanian Kaoru Ichikawa Ayako Kawai Editorial secretariat Ikuko Matsumoto Caecilia Manago William Dunbar Cover photo credits Top left: Ecosystem Conservation Society-Japan Second from bottom: Susanne Kopf Satoyama Initiative The Satoyama Initiative is a global effort, first proposed jointly by the United Nations University and the Ministry of the Environment of Japan (MOEJ), to realize “societies in harmony with nature” and contribute to biodiversity conservation through the revitalization and sustainable management of “socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes” (SEPLS). The United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS) serves as the Secretariat of IPSI, an international partnership of organizations working to realize the vision of the Satoyama Initiative. UNU-IAS The United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS) is a leading research and teaching institute based in Tokyo, Japan. Its mission is to advance efforts towards a more sustainable future, through policy-relevant research and capacity development focused on sustainability and its social, economic and environmental dimensions. UNU- IAS serves the international community, making valuable and innovative contributions to high-level policymaking and debates within the UN system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of the Satoyama Initiative and Challenges and Ways And
    Global Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative “Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being” TheThe ConceptConcept ofof thethe SatoyamaSatoyama InitiativeInitiative andand ChallengesChallenges andand WaysWays andand MeansMeans toto SupportSupport SocioSocio--ecologicalecological ProductionProduction LandscapesLandscapes Prof. Kazuhiko Takeuchi Vice Rector, United Nations University 29 January 2010 UNESCO, Paris, France “Biocultural Landscapes” and “Socio-ecological Production Landscapes” Biocultural landscapes “Landscape formed as a blend of natural processes and human culture, which mutually affect each other.” Socio-ecological Production Landscapes Propose to integrate elements of biodiversity, for example, “Dynamic mosaics of managed socio-ecological systems that maintain biodiversity and produce a bundle of ecosystem services for human well-being.“ “Satoyama and satoumi landscapes” is defined as “Dynamic mosaics of managed socio-ecological systems that produce a bundle of ecosystem services for human well-being." (Japan SGA, 2010) 2 Challenges facing socio-ecological production landscapes Industrialization, urbanization, population increase and decrease, technological advancement, climate change Weakening of traditional organizational system, Economic difficulties, Loss of traditional / indigenous knowledge, Nearsighted policy Lack of awareness • Conversion of land use (expansion of cultivated fields, etc) • Unsustainable logging, and plantation • Switch from multiple-cropping to mono-cropping systems • Introduction of new crop species, such
    [Show full text]
  • For Peatland Restoration
    “Peatland Monitoring” for Peatland Restoration Prof. Mitsuru Osaki: Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University President of Japanese Peatland Society Collaborated among Hokkaido University- JICA- Indonesia Institutions Main Project Sites ・JSPS Core University Program (1997-2006): Environmental Conservation and Land Use Management of Wetland Mega Rice Project of Peatland Ecosystem in Southeast Asia • inCentral Central Kalimantan, Kalimantan, Indonesia Indoneshia ・JST-JICA Project (SATREPS) (2008-2014): Wild Fire and Carbon Management in Peat-Forest in Indonesia • Peatland area in Mega Rice Project site ・JICA Project as follow-up of SATREPS (2015-2016): Formulation of a Manual and Trial Calculation of GHG Emission from Peatland in Central Kalimantan DF BC UD F Various Study Topics: ・GHG Flux (CO2, CH4, N2O) measuring ・Fire Detection and Protection CO2 observation towers at ・ Water Table Monitoring and Management UDF:(Un-drained Peat) ・Peatland Ecology ・Soluble Carbon Monitoring DF:(Drained Peat ) ・Peatland Subsidence Monitoring BC:(Burnet Peat) ©18/01/ 2016 Tropical Peatland Ecosystems Editors: Osaki, Mitsuru, Tsuji, Nobuyuki (Eds.) Parts: 9 Chapters: 41 Pages: 651 Authors: 160 PANDUAN PENDUGAAN GUIDEBOOK FOR ESTIM ATING EMISI KARBON DARI LAHAN CARBON EMISSIONS FROM GAMBUT TROPIS DI TROPICAL PEATLANDS INDONESIA IN INDONESIA Pedoman Pendugaan Emisi Karbon dari Gambut Tropis di Indonesia | 1 G id b k f C b E i i f T i l P tl d i I d i | 1 Manual of Tropical Peatland Management Data Collection Peatland Maps Remote Sensing Data Set
    [Show full text]
  • Biochar: a Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate
    Reference for authors V2 Section 3: Biomass pyrolysis ........................................... 5 Chapter 10 (Frederik Ronsse et al.): Biochar Biochar: A regional Supply production ............................................................. 6 Chain Approach in View of Chapter 11 (Byungho Song et al.): Pyrolysis Climate Change Mitigation application of biomass char ................................... 6 Chapter 12 (Basak Uzun et al.): Pyrolysis: A sustainable way from Waste to Energy ................. 6 Book outline and short descriptions of Chapter 13 (Maliwan Haruthaithanasan et al.): The registered contributions, Reference for role of biochar production for sustainable authors development in Thailand, Laos and Cambodia ...... 6 Section 4: Biochar-Soil Interactions ................................ 6 Chapter 14 (Gerhard Soja et al.): Biochar applications to agricultural soils in temperate climate – more than carbon sequestration? ......... 7 Table of contents Chapter 15 (Deborah Page-Dumroese et al.): Opportunities and Uses of Biochar on Forest Sites Purpose of this document .......................................... 1 in North America ................................................... 7 Preparation of the manuscript (this will be updated in Chapter 16 (Ibrahim Ortas et al.): Role of further versions of this document) ............................. 2 mycorrhiza and biochar on plant growth and soil The book in a nutshell ................................................ 2 quality ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Satochi-Satoyama Conservation and Sustainable
    Preamble Living in harmony with nature, building vibrant communities In the Jomon Era, the Japanese Archipelago was covered with virgin forests and wetlands, where people’s lives were integrated with hunting and fishing. With the introduction of agricultural civilization, they converted the wetlands into paddies and built ditches and irrigation ponds. Harvested for firewood, charcoal and fertilizer, the dark primeval forests were transformed into open, light-filled woodlands. Grasslands and fields were created through grazing and grass harvesting. Over 3,000 years of such human-nature relationships, Satochi-satoyama areas have been formed and maintained, where people have enjoyed the blessings of nature in a sustainable manner, with cyclic use of natural resources around the villages. Satochi-satoyama, created by such human activities, have played a role in enriching the biological environment of the archipelago. In the Japanese Archipelago, a number of flora and fauna inhabit not only in remnants of wilderness in deep mountains but also around human settlements. Among these species, while the global warming after the last glacier period had shifted deciduous broadleaf forests to evergreen broadleaf forests, some species had found their safe sites in man-made open habitats in Satochi-satoyama woodlands and survived there. Such plant and animal species of Satochi-satoyama, represented by the Gifu butterfly and the Japanese faun lily, have been found around people and used as the motifs for haiku poetry and traditional drawing since ancient times. As described in some school songs, such as “Furusato” and “Haru-no-ogawa”, the classic Satochi-satoyama landscape symbolizes the image of the indigenous landscape that can be shared among the Japanese people and gives the basis of their spirit and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Satoyama-Like Landscapes in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative Concept Information Paper Satoyama-like Landscapes in the Asia-Pacific Region This paper is a synthesis of the summaries provided by government representatives and experts on the characteristics of satoyama-like landscapes in their countries as well as the information contained in the brochure “The Satoyama Initiative”(published in March 2009 by Ministry of the Environment, Japan) in regard to Japanese satoyama landscape. The special characteristics and significance that may generally be considered common to these landscapes had been set down in the discussion papers of the International Expert Meeting on International Satoyama Initiative Concept held on 25 July 2009; the discussion paper was shared with the government representative and the experts when they prepared the summary. The summaries provided also carry information on the benefits of these landscapes for biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Summary papers were submitted by an expert from China and by government representatives from Cambodia, the Cook Islands, India, Indonesia, Iran, Republic of Korea, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam, on the occasion of the Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on the Satoyama Initiative Concept held from 1 to 3 October, 2009. The objectives of the workshop were to: - review the management features of satoyama-like landscapes in the Asia-Pacific region and their benefits for biodiversity conservation and human well-being, and - to discuss strategic elements of the vision and perspectives of the Satoyama Initiative. 1. Characteristics (1) Structure The adaptation of human beings to their local environment while making the best use of the available natural resources is one of the main forces behind satoyama-like landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Historical Slash and Burn Cultivation in the Development of Cultural Landscapes and Forest Vegetation in South Estonia
    PILLE TOMSON PILLE VIIS VIIMAST KAITSMIST SHUAI LI INDUCTION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS FROM LEAVES UPON OZONE AND METHYL JASMONATE (MEJA) TREATMENTS IN SOUTH ESTONIA VEGETATION AND FOREST LANDSCAPES OF CULTURAL THE DEVELOPMENT IN SLASH AND BURN CULTIVATION OF HISTORICAL ROLE TAIMELEHTEDE LENDUVÜHENDITE EMISSIOONI INDUKTSIOON OSOONI JA METÜÜL JASMONAADI MÕJUL Professor Ülo Niinemets 26. veebruar 2018 KANAGENDRAN AROORAN DIFFERENTIAL REGULATION OF RELEASE OF LEAF STRESS VOLATILES: FROM TERPENE SYNTHASE GENE EXPRESSION TO EMISSION RESPONSES UNDER ROLE OF HISTORICAL SLASH AND BURN HEAT, OZONE AND WOUNDING STRESSES THE CULTIVATIONINFLUENCE OFIN THEGROWTH DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS OF ON BIOGEENSETE LENDUVÜHENDITE EMISSIOONI REGULATSIOON STRESSITINGIMUSTES: GEENIEKSPRESSIOONIST LENDUVÜHENDITE PHYSICO-MECHANICALCULTURAL LANDSCAPES PROPERTIES AND FOREST OF SCOTS EMISSIOONIVASTUSTENI ERINEVATE ABIOOTILISTE STRESSIDE KORRAL VEGETATIONPINE (Pinus IN SOUTH sylvestris ESTONIA L.) Professor Ülo Niinemets 9. märts 2018 WOOD IN ESTONIA KAAREL SOOTS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY FOR POST-HARVESTED CULTIVATED BERRIES AJALOOLISEKASVUTINGIMUSTE ALEPÕLLUNDUSE MÕJU HARILIKU ROLL LÕUNA-EESTI MÄNNI KULTUURMARJADE KORISTUSJÄRGSE TÖÖTLEMISE TEHNOLOOGIA MAASTIKE(Pinus JA METSATAIMESTIKUsylvestris L.) PUIDU FÜÜSIKALIS- KUJUNEMISEL Professor Jüri Olt 6. aprill 2018 MEHAANILISTELE OMADUSTELE EESTIS ANDRES JÄÄRATS THE EFFECT OF PLANTING STOCK AND SOIL SCARIFICATION ON FOREST REGENERATION REGINO KASK ISTUTUSMATERJALI JA MAAPINNA ETTEVALMISTAMISE MÕJU METSA PILLE TOMSON
    [Show full text]