Propp's Tale Role and a Ballad Repertoire Author(s): David Buchan Source: The Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 95, No. 376 (Apr. - Jun., 1982), pp. 159-172 Published by: American Folklore Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/540716 . Accessed: 09/04/2013 10:16 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. American Folklore Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of American Folklore. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 143.107.8.10 on Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:16:26 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions DAVID BUCHAN Propp's Tale Role and a BalladRepertoire THE WORKOF VLADIMIRPROPP (1968) has exercised a highly stimulating effect on folkloristics in general in recent decades. Its impact on ballad scholarship, however, has been relatively limited. Bruce Beatie (1978) has suggestively analyzed the first 25 ballad types in Child in the light of Propp's mor- phological scheme;Judith Turner(1972) has constructeda Proppiansystem for eight ballad types (Child 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77) in her "Morphology of the 'True Love' Ballad"; and Ruth Webber (1978) has utilized Proppian principlesin her "Prolegomenato the Study of the NarrativeStructure of the Hispanic Ballad." And very recently, James Porter (1980) has stressed the potential benefits for ballad studies in Propp's methods.