DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 London Assembly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 London Assembly Appendix 1 London Assembly (Plenary) Meeting – 7 December 2016 Transcript of Agenda Item 4: Question and Answer Session – Gavin Barwell MP – Minister of State for Housing, Planning and Minister for London Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Good morning, Minister. It was good of you to come. There will be a lead- off question, but I understand that before I put the easy question you would like to make a statement. Gavin Barwell MP (Minister of State for Housing and Planning and Minister for London): Thank you, first of all, Mr Chairman, for your invitation. It is a pleasure to be here and I hope that this can be a regular thing. It is very useful to have a close dialogue between Members of the Assembly and me. I will just say a few very brief remarks because I am conscious that time is short. First of all, the Government is committed to working with the Greater London Authority (GLA) and with the boroughs. London plays an absolutely critical role in terms of the United Kingdom (UK) economy and certainly, in terms of my responsibilities for housing and planning policy, the part of the country where the deficit between what we are building and what we need to build is at its greatest in this city of ours. In relation to the Autumn Statement, there was some extremely positive news in terms of the affordable housing settlement, which I am sure we will come on to talk about in a second, and also some progress on devolution in relation to the Work and Health Programme and adult education. I very much look forward to answering my questions. I will try to keep my answers as brief as possible to allow as many people as possible to ask me questions. Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. The very easy starting question is: what do you see as the greatest issues and challenges facing London? Gavin Barwell MP (Minister of State for Housing and Planning and Minister for London): I am not sure how easy a starter question that actually is, Mr Chairman, but probably, given my particular interests, I would refer to the housing situation in the capital. If London is going to continue to perform economically, it is vital that people can afford to live and work in the capital. We have seen for 30 or 40 years that across the country as a whole but particularly here in London we have not been building anything like the number of homes that we need to build. As a result, both house prices and rents have risen faster than earnings and certainly in some inner London boroughs the affordability ratio - the ratio of median earnings to median prices - has now reached a completely unacceptable level. Addressing the housing crisis that we face and making sure that we build more homes of all types so that ordinary working people have a chance to own their own home in this city would be the number one issue, in my opinion. Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Thank you very much. Florence Eshalomi AM: It is great to see you here as a London Member of Parliament (MP) for Croydon, not too far from my constituency in Lambeth and Southwark. 1 One of the main issues that has been on your agenda and I am sure in your inbox as well has been the issue around Southern Rail. In the run-up to the mayoral election, quite a number of the candidates committed to looking at further rail devolution in London and it is right to say that it is something that has worked quite well with London Overground. Given that there is a lot of cross-party support not just from this Assembly but from councillors, council leaders and even MPs, including some of your Conservative colleagues, why do you feel that the Government is not supporting this move and looking at additional rail devolution at this time? Again, in another example this morning, we know that Southern Rail has strikes on and Brixton Station this morning was just a nightmare to get to. I am sure some of your constituents from Croydon were trying to get on that route this morning. Gavin Barwell MP (Minister of State for Housing and Planning and Minister for London): Let us start with the areas where we are all in agreement. The first thing to say is that the service on Southern Rail at the moment is wholly unacceptable and it is causing misery to tens of thousands of people on an almost daily basis. The reasons for the problems are complex. The company itself: its performance has been not acceptable. A lot of the problems that your and my constituents experience are to do with the infrastructure that Network Rail is responsible for, not the operator, and there are issues about the action that the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) has taken as well. The second area where I hope there is a strong degree of consensus is that the Government very much wants to work with Transport for London (TfL) to improve services on those franchises in south London. Where you are quite right to say there has been a change of approach - and you will have heard the Secretary of State for Transport’s statement to the House of Commons yesterday - is that he has looked into these issues and feels very strongly that the right way to deliver the improvements to services that we all desperately want to see is to get much better integration between the running of the signalling and the track and the people running the service and to bring that much closer together in the franchise. He wants to work with both TfL and Kent County Council in relation to Southeastern, which is the first franchise that comes up, to try to achieve that. His view, which he expressed very clearly, I thought, in the Commons yesterday, is that if you try to separate out the services that serve London and the inner southeast from the services further down to Kent, that kind of major reorganisation of the network could make things worse rather than better. That is why he has come to that judgement. Tony Devenish AM: Minister, thank you very much for the £3.15 billion. If we listened to the Mayor, we would think he had written the cheque rather than you, but we do appreciate the cheque that came from you. One of my concerns is the lack of actual detail we have had from the Mayor on how he is going to deliver the 90,000 affordable houses and the rest of his commitments. Are you looking for more detail from the Mayor in due course to make sure he delivers? You have given him the money. He now needs to get on and build the homes. Gavin Barwell MP (Minister of State for Housing and Planning and Minister for London): We will want to hold the Mayor to account but also other people around the country that we give money for affordable housing to make sure that the homes get delivered. The prospectus has been published by the GLA, to be fair, very quickly after receipt of the money. Just on the figure, it is worth pointing out that the news is potentially even better than the £3.15 billion. The £3.15 billion is the share of what the Affordable Housing Programme was prior to the Autumn Statement. 2 London is getting 43% of the England-wide budget, which is a record amount and the Mayor has been generous enough to say that. It is the best ever settlement for affordable housing London has ever had. However, in the Autumn Statement, the Chancellor announced a further £1.4 billion for the England-wide affordable housing budget and London will get a share of that money. Therefore, there is even further good news to come in terms of the level of funding that we are providing. It is absolutely critical that we do that because it is clear from the data that the affordability crisis is at its worst in London. I would just end by stressing one thing, which is that in terms of making housing in this city more affordable, there are two things that we need to do. First of all, we need to provide more shared ownership and more housing for submarket rent, but we also need to build more homes generally. The reason housing has become more unaffordable is because the supply of housing across this city for years and years has not kept pace with demand. Therefore, we need to get overall supply up as well as providing record levels of funding for subsidised housing. Tony Devenish AM: There has been lots of cross-party support in terms of trying to get more building by small and medium enterprises (SMEs), by co-operative societies, by councils and by housing associations. The Mayor seems a little bit slow in getting going and at the moment and he is mainly working with the same old major developers. Can you urge him to broaden the supply chain so that we can actually get building in London? Gavin Barwell MP (Minister of State for Housing and Planning and Minister for London): That is a critical issue. Our Housing White Paper is to be published early in the New Year. Our view is that in order to tackle the housing situation we face in this country, it needs action on all fronts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Migrant Voters in the 2015 General Election
    Migrant Voters in the 2015 General Election Dr Robert Ford, Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE), The University of Manchester Ruth Grove-White, Migrants’ Rights Network Migrant Voters in the 2015 General Election Content 1. Introduction 2 2. This briefing 4 3. Migrant voters and UK general elections 5 4. Migrant voters in May 2015 6 5. Where are migrant voters concentrated? 9 6. Where could migrant votes be most influential? 13 7. Migrant voting patterns and intentions 13 8. Conclusion 17 9. Appendix 1: Methodology 18 10. References 19 1. Migrant Voters in the 2015 General Election 1. Introduction The 2015 general election looks to be the closest and least predictable in living memory, and immigration is a key issue at the heart of the contest. With concerns about the economy slowly receding as the financial crisis fades into memory, immigration has returned to the top of the political agenda, named by more voters as their most pressing political concern than any other issue1. Widespread anxiety about immigration has also been a key driver behind the surge in support for UKIP, though it is far from the only issue this new party is mobilizing around2. Much attention has been paid to the voters most anxious about immigration, and what can be done to assuage their concerns. Yet amidst this fierce debate about whether, and how, to restrict immigration, an important electoral voice has been largely overlooked: that of migrants themselves. In this briefing, we argue that the migrant The political benefits of engaging with electorate is a crucial constituency in the 2015 migrant voters could be felt far into the election, and will only grow in importance in future.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Governments Attitudes to Social Housing
    Understanding Government’s Attitudes to Social Housing through the Application of Politeness Theory Abstract This paper gives a brief background of housing policy in England from the 2010 general election where David Cameron was appointed Prime Minister of a Coalition government with the Liberal Democrats and throughout the years that followed. The study looks at government attitudes towards social housing from 2015, where David Cameron had just become Prime Minister of an entirely Conservative Government, to 2018 following important events such as Brexit and the tragic Grenfell Tower fire. Through the application of politeness theory, as originally put forward by Brown & Levinson (1978, 1987), the study analysis the speeches of key ministers to the National Housing Summit and suggests that the use of positive and negative politeness strategies could give an idea as to the true attitudes of government. Word Count: 5472 Emily Pumford [email protected] Job Title: Researcher 1 Organisation: The Riverside Group Current research experience: 3 years Understanding Government’s Attitudes to Social Housing through the Application of Politeness Theory Introduction and Background For years, the Conservative Party have prided themselves on their support for home ownership. From Margaret Thatcher proudly proclaiming that they had taken the ‘biggest single step towards a home-owning democracy ever’ (Conservative Manifest 1983), David Cameron arguing that they would become ‘once again, the party of home ownership in our country’ (Conservative Party Conference Speech 2014) and Theresa May, as recently as 2017, declaring that they would ‘make the British Dream a reality by reigniting home ownership in Britain’ (Conservative Party Conference Speech 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 11 January 2018 On 8-9 January 2018, Prime Minister Theresa May conducted a ministerial reshuffle. This guide has been updated to reflect the changes. The Conservative government does not have a parliamentary majority of MPs but has a confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The DUP will support the government in key votes, such as on the Queen's Speech and Budgets, as well as Brexit and security matters, which are likely to dominate most of the current Parliament. This gives the government a working majority of 13. This is a briefing for BIA members on the new Government and key ministerial appointments for our sector. Contents Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministerial brief for the Life Sciences.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Theresa May’s team in Number 10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities pertinent
    [Show full text]
  • 18 September 2006 Council Minutes
    Agenda item: 2a CROYDON COUNCIL MINUTES MEETING OF THE COUNCIL HELD ON Monday, 18 July 2011 at 6.30pm in the Council Chamber, Town Hall. THE MAYOR, COUNCILLOR GRAHAM BASS – PRESIDING Councillors Arram, Avis, Ayres, Bashford, Bee, Bonner, Butler, Buttinger, Chatterjee, Chowdhury, Clouder, Collins, Cromie, Cummings, Fisher, Fitze, Fitzsimons, Flemming, Gatland, Godfrey, Gray, Hale, Hall, Harris, Hay-Justice, Hoar, Hollands, Hopley, Jewitt, Kabir, Kellett, B Khan, , Kyeremeh, Lawlor, Lenton, Letts, Mansell, Marshall, D Mead, M Mead, Mohan, Neal, Newman, O’Connell, Osland, Parker, Pearson, Perry, H Pollard, T Pollard, Rajendran, G Ryan, P Ryan, Selva, Scott, Shahul-Hameed, Slipper, Smith, Speakman, Thomas, Watson, Wentworth, Winborn, Woodley and Wright. Absent: Councillors Bains, George-Hilley, S Khan and Quadir 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (agenda item 1) Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Shafi Khan 2. MINUTES (agenda item 2) RESOLVED that the Minutes of the Annual Council Meeting held on 23 May 2011 be signed as a correct record. 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS (agenda item 3) All Members of the Council confirmed that their interests as listed in their Annual Declaration of Interests Forms were accurate and up-to-date. Council Sara Bashford declared a personal interest in agenda item 6 (PQ 040) as she mentioned Gavin Barwell MP in her reply to the question and she works for him. Councillor Janet Marshall declared a personal interest in agenda item 10 as co-opted Governor of Quest Academy; C20110718 min 1 Councillor Margaret Mead declared a personal interest in agenda item 10 as a Governor of Whitgift Foundation. 4. URGENT BUSINESS (agenda item number 4) Councillor Tony Newman moved that the Extraordinary Council Meeting be brought forward as urgent business.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidence Now Building As Town Attracts Investors
    Big success Confidence now as cycling building as town elite speed attracts investors PROMINENT investors are across town tapping into Croydon’s potential with a succession of THOUSANDS of people lined the major deals helping to change streets of Croydon as the town hosted the face of the town. a hugely successful round of cycling’s elite team competition on Tuesday, Consultant surveyor Vanessa June 2. Clark (pictured) believes deals such as Hermes Investment The town was the subject of an Management’s purchase of the hour-long highlights package on recently-refurbished Number ITV4 after hosting round three of the One Croydon, one of the town’s women’s Matrix Fitness Grand Prix most iconic buildings, are and round seven of the men’s Pearl “game-changing” in terms of Izumi Tour Series. the way the town is being And the event got people talking perceived. about Croydon in a fresh light as, “The good news is that quality central London what the experts described as a investors now see Croydon as an attractive “hugely-technical” circuit produced a proposition,”she said. “A s confidence in the town thrilling evening’s racing. has improved, so have prices.” Council leader Tony Newman and The so-called 50p Building, designed by Richard Mayor of Croydon Councillor Seifert, changed hands in a reported £36 million Patricia Hay-Justice were among the deal, bringing Hermes’ investment in the town this presentation teams. WHEELS IN MOTION: The cycling tour events held in Croydon earlier this month were hailed as a success year to around £70 million, having already acquired the Grants Entertainment Centre in High Street, which features a 10-screen Vue Cinema, health club, bars and restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee CRIME AND COURTS BILL [LORDS] Eleventh Sitting Thursday 7 February 2013 (Morning) CONTENTS CLAUSE 36 agreed to. SCHEDULE 17 agreed to. CLAUSE 37 agreed to. SCHEDULE 18 agreed to. Programme order amended. Adjourned till Tuesday 12 February at five minutes to Nine o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £6·00 PBC (Bill 115) 2012 - 2013 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 11 February 2013 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 367 Public Bill Committee7 FEBRUARY 2013 Crime and Courts Bill [Lords] 368 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: MARTIN CATON,†NADINE DORRIES † Barwell, Gavin (Croydon Central) (Con) † Lopresti, Jack (Filton and Bradley Stoke) (Con) † Browne, Mr Jeremy (Minister
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election
    June 2015 Intelligence for a multi-ethnic Britain Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election Summary Table 1. Top 15 Labour vote share increases in diverse seats, 2015 • In 2015, Labour remained the first preference for most Labour Minority Black and minority ethnic voters, with around 60% choosing Constituency increase population Labour. The Conservatives have increased their vote share Birmingham, Hall Green 26.9% 64% significantly, from around 16% in 2010 to over 25% in 2015 Brent Central* 20.9% 61% • The Liberal Democrats got around 5% of the BME vote, and Poplar and Limehouse 18.6% 57% the Greens less. Only 2% of BME voters chose UKIP Bethnal Green and Bow 18.3% 53% • There is increasing variation in how different ethnic minority Birmingham, Ladywood 18.0% 73% groups vote, as well as regional differences Walthamstow 17.0% 53% • There are now 41 BME MPs, a significant rise, suggesting a Manchester, Gorton 17.0% 48% future BME Prime Minister could now be sitting in Parliament Birmingham, Hodge Hill 16.4% 64% • The success of Britain’s democracy depends not only on BME Leyton and Wanstead 15.0% 51% voter participation and representation, but on policymakers Ilford South 14.6% 76% responding to ethnic inequalities Leicester South 14.2% 51% Bradford East 13.8% 47% Introduction Bermondsey and Old Southwark* 13.8% 42% The 2015 General Election saw the Conservative Prime Ealing Southall 13.5% 70% Minister David Cameron returned with his party’s first overall Ealing Central and Acton* 13.1% 37% majority since John Major’s win in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 20 August 2019 This is a briefing for BIA members on the new Government led by Boris Johnson and key ministerial appointments for our sector. With 311 MPs, the Conservative Government does not have a parliamentary majority and the new Prime Minister may also have to contend with a number of his own backbenchers who are openly opposed to his premiership and approach to Brexit. It is currently being assumed that he is continuing the confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). If the DUP will support the Government in key votes, such as on his Brexit deal (if one emerges), the Queen's Speech and Budgets, Boris Johnson will a working majority of 1. However, this may be diminished by Conservative rebels and possible defections. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministers and policy maker profiles................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities relevant to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced. Department Position Holder
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 29 November 2018 This is a briefing for BIA members on the Government and key ministerial appointments for our sector. It has been updated to reflect the changes in the Cabinet following the resignations in the aftermath of the government’s proposed Brexit deal. The Conservative government does not have a parliamentary majority of MPs but has a confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The DUP will support the government in key votes, such as on the Queen's Speech and Budgets. This gives the government a working majority of 13. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministerial brief for the Life Sciences.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Theresa May’s team in Number 10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities pertinent to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Government's Attitudes to Social Housing Through The
    Understanding Government’s Attitudes to Social Housing through the Application of Politeness Theory Abstract This paper gives a brief background of housing policy in England from the 2010 general election where David Cameron was appointed Prime Minister of a Coalition government with the Liberal Democrats and throughout the years that followed. The study looks at government attitudes towards social housing from 2015, where David Cameron had just become Prime Minister of an entirely Conservative Government, to 2018 following important events such as Brexit and the tragic Grenfell Tower fire. Through the application of politeness theory, as originally put forward by Brown & Levinson (1978, 1987), the study analysis the speeches of key ministers to the National Housing Summit and suggests that the use of positive and negative politeness strategies could give an idea as to the true attitudes of government. Word Count: 5472 Emily Pumford [email protected] Job Title: Researcher Organisation: The Riverside Group Current research experience: 3 years 1 Understanding Government’s Attitudes to Social Housing through the Application of Politeness Theory Introduction and Background For years, the Conservative Party have prided themselves on their support for home ownership. From Margaret Thatcher proudly proclaiming that they had taken the ‘biggest single step towards a home-owning democracy ever’ (Conservative Manifest 1983), David Cameron arguing that they would become ‘once again, the party of home ownership in our country’ (Conservative Party Conference Speech 2014) and Theresa May, as recently as 2017, declaring that they would ‘make the British Dream a reality by reigniting home ownership in Britain’ (Conservative Party Conference Speech 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Prime Minister 3 Attorney General’s Office 5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6 Cabinet Office 8 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Ministry of Defence 14 Department for Education 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 18 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 Department of Health 22 Home Office 24 Department for International Development 26 Ministry of Justice 27 Northern Ireland Office 30 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 31 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 32 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 33 Scotland Office 34 Department for Transport 35 HM Treasury 37 Wales Office 39 Department for Work and Pensions 40 Government Whips – Commons 42 Government Whips – Lords 46 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Briefing: the New 'Kingmaker' Seats That Could Decide
    Background Briefing: The new ‘Kingmaker’ seats that could decide the next Prime Minister Britain’s electoral map is changing in this too-close-to-call election. Our fragmenting party system and shifting electoral geography has made the 2015 General Election a battle on many different electoral fronts. North of the border, Election 2015 is now an “SNP versus all comers” contest as the fallout from last Autumn’s referendum rewrites the rules of Scottish politics. While Wales adapts five party politics, Northern Ireland’s tight races in Belfast and Fermanagh will also be watched more closely for their potential impact on the Commons arithmetic, in an election on a knife-edge across Britain. The Conservatives and Labour often go head-to-head in their battle for Downing Street, particularly in the north-west, the Midlands and the outer London suburbs, while it is about Liberal Democrats versus the Conservatives in the south-west. UKIP’s insurgency challenges both major parties around the coast in Kent and Essex, Lincolnshire and Humberside, where voters are keenest to question the pace of change in British society. Candidates in increasingly-diverse cities and university towns face different challenges about whether they have a vision of the future equipped to keep pace with those changes. In this kaleidoscope of shifting party colours, one thing that has been less noticed is that the geographic frontlines of the battle between the two major parties has also shifted considerably too from a generation ago. Our examination of the new sceptical centre of this uncertain election nation reveals some important truths about how the changing nature of British society may well be reflected in our politics too.
    [Show full text]