Simply Jesus: the Bible Study Study Sheet 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Simply Jesus: The Bible Study Study Sheet 1 By Rev. Fr. Dustin Lyon Introduction Wright, NT. Simply Jesus: A New Vision of Who He Was, What He Did, and Why He Matters. New York: HarperOne, 2011. The Roman Storm • 1,000 years of history o Roman Kingdom (8th century BC – 509 BC) o Roman RepubLiC (509 BC – 27 BC) o Roman Empire (27 BC – 476 AD [Western], 1453 AD [Eastern]) • Gaius Julius Caesar (49 BC – 44 BC) o First Triumvirate ("three men") (Caesar, Crassus, Pompey) o Caesar’s Civil War and the BattLe of PharsaLus (9 August 48 BC) o Caesar beComes a titLe (Kaiser/Tsar) o Divine Status • OCtavian (August Caesar) (27 BC – 14 AD) o 2nd Triumvirate (OCtavian, Lepidus, Mark Antony) o BattLe Actium (2 September 31 BC) and Egypt o Augustus (worthy of honor) and “Son of god” and pontifex maximus o The STORY of Rome = great CLimax at Last (Pax Augusta/Romana) o Virgil Eclogues 4. o The Good News: “We have an Emperor! JustiCe, PeaCe, SeCurity, and Prosperity are ours forever! The Son of God has beCome King of the World!” • Tiberius (42 BC – 37 AD) o Coin: “Augustus Tiberius Caesar, son of the Divine Augustus” & Pontifix Maximus • Middle East o Important for its grain (Like today’s USA dependent on oiL) o VitaL to keep under control (cf., see above, “The Good News”) 1 The Jewish Storm • On going drama, of whiCh they were aCtors, BUT it had a GOAL o Prospective eschatology, Looking FORWARD to a goLden-age = freedom, justice, and peace. It was there’s by right. • Story of the Exodus o Slavery o Passover and Red Sea o Desert o Promised Land • Creation and Covenant o God made world o CaLLed Israel to be his peopLe o Reorder world to rescue his people, Israel • Empires o Out of Egypt to Promised Land § Northern Israel/United Monarchy (930 – 720 BC) § Judah (Judea) (930 – 586 BC) o Assyrian (Conquered Northern IsraeL in 720 BC) o Babylon (Conquered Judah in 586 BC and TempLe destroyed) o Persia (conquered Babylon in 539 BC) o Greeks (conquered Persia in 330 BC) o Rome (Pompey Conquered JerusaLem in 63 BC) 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen
Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Howard Chen All rights reserved ABSTRACT Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen This dissertation analyzes the three main protagonists of Lucan’s Bellum Civile through their attempts to utilize, resist, or match a pattern of action which I call the “formula.” Most evident in Caesar, the formula is a cycle of alternating states of energy that allows him to gain a decisive edge over his opponents by granting him the ability of perpetual regeneration. However, a similar dynamic is also found in rivers, which thus prove to be formidable adversaries of Caesar in their own right. Although neither Pompey nor Cato is able to draw on the Caesarian formula successfully, Lucan eventually associates them with the river-derived variant, thus granting them a measure of resistance (if only in the non-physical realm). By tracing the development of the formula throughout the epic, the dissertation provides a deeper understanding of the importance of natural forces in Lucan’s poem as well as the presence of an underlying drive that unites its fractured world. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ vi Introduction ......................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Civil War in Rome and the End of the Roman Republic
Civil War in Rome and the End of the Roman Republic © Student Handouts, Inc. www.studenthandouts.com Tiberius Gracchus and Land Reform The lower classes (plebeians) were suffering. 133 BCE – Tiberius Gracchus was elected as tribune He promised land reform of the plebeians Tiberius Gracchus told the people: “You fight and die to give luxury to other men…but you have not a foot of ground to call your own.” Wanted to limit the Wanted to rebuild the The patricians were not Tiberius Gracchus and amount of land each farming class by pleased with Tiberius hundreds of his followers person could own redistributing land Gracchus were murdered Gaius Gracchus and Reform Gaius was elected tribune in 122 BCE, about ten He also wanted land Gaius wanted even more years after his brother reform. than land reform. was murdered. Gaius wanted the Gaius proposed that Gaius wanted a public government to sell grain landless Romans be works program to employ to the poor at reduced settled in the provinces. the poor. prices. Gaius wanted to reform Riots erupted. In 121 the way that taxes were Gaius wanted to decrease BCE, he was killed along collected by publicans in the Senate’s power. with thousands of his the provinces. supporters. Differing Parties Continued to Argue Optimates Populares • Senatorial party • People’s party • Wanted to maintain • Had its strength in the position and the Comitia power of the (Assembly) wealthy patrician • Wanted reforms class Military Dictators Come to Power • Why did military dictators come to power? – Constant fighting in Rome between the rich and poor – Restlessness in the provinces – Slave rebellions (e.g., Spartacus) – Barbarian invasions (though not as serious as they became during the era of the Roman empire) – The people needed strong leadership Gaius Marius (ca.
[Show full text]
Pharsalus 48 BC So SI SHEPPARD Is a Former Journalist Currently Enrolled As a Ph.D
Campaign OSPREY Pharsalus 48 BC so SI SHEPPARD is a former journalist currently enrolled as a Ph.D. student in International Relations at Johns Hopkins University. He graduated with an MA with Distinction from Victoria University and was winner of the Sir Desmond Todd Award for best thesis in a political subject. Si Sheppard has published a number of books and has contributed numerous articles on political and historical topics to leading journals, magazines and newspapers. This is his first title for Osprey. He lives in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ADAM HOOK studied graphic design, and began his work as an illustrator in 1983. He specializes in detailed historical reconstructions, and has illustrated Osprey titles on the Aztecs, the Greeks, the American Civil War and the American Revolution. His work features in exhibitions and publications throughout the world. He lives in East Sussex, UK. Pharsalus 48 BC Caesar and Pompey - Clash of the Titans Campaign • 174 Pharsalus 48 BC Caesar and Pompey - Clash of the Titans Si Sheppard • Illustrated by Adam Hook ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dedicated to Stephen Levine: mentor, colleague and friend. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 7 CHRONOLOGY 17 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 21 The Caesareans • The Republicans THE LEGIONS OF THE LATE REPUBLIC 29 THE CAMPAIGN 33 The Rubicon to Brundisium • Brundisium to Dyrrachium • Dyrrachium to Pharsalus THE BATTLE 54 Opposing plans • Opposing armies • The clash of arms AFTERMATH 83 THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 92 BIBLIOGRAPHY 93 INDEX 95 INTRODUCTION: TO THE RUBICON he legend SPQR - Senatus Populusque Romanus, the Senate and People of Rome - emblazoned on the standards of the city's all- conquering legions in the last few centuries before Christ was both a potent symbol of the source of the republic's power and a reflection of the smouldering tension inherent in its system of government.
[Show full text]
Acoustic Simulation of Julius Caesar's Battlefield Speeches
acoustics Article Acoustic Simulation of Julius Caesar’s Battlefield Speeches Braxton Boren Audio Technology Program, Department of Performing Arts, College of Arts & Sciences, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-202-885-1482 Received: 14 September 2018; Accepted: 10 October 2018; Published: 14 October 2018 Abstract: History contains many accounts of speeches given by civic and military leaders before large crowds prior to the invention of electronic amplification. Historians have debated the historical accuracy of these accounts, often making some reference to acoustics, either supporting or refuting the accounts, but without any numerical justification. The field of digital humanities, and more specifically archaeoacoustics, seeks to use computational techniques to provide empirical data to improve historical analysis. Julius Caesar recalled giving speeches to 14,000 men after the battle of Dyrrachium and another to 22,000 men before the battle of Pharsalus during the Roman Civil War. Caesar’s background and education are discussed, including his training in rhetoric and oratory, which would have affected his articulation and effective sound pressure level while addressing his troops. Based on subjective reports about Caesar’s oratorical abilities, his effective Sound Pressure Level (SPL) is assumed to be 80 dBA, about 6 dB above the average loud speaking voice but lower than that of the loudest trained actors and singers. Simulations show that for reasonable background noise conditions Caesar could have been heard intelligibly by 14,000 soldiers in a quiet, controlled environment as in the speech at Dyrrachium. In contrast, even granting generous acoustic and geometric conditions, Caesar could not have been heard by more than about 700 soldiers while his army was on the march before the battle of Pharsalus.
[Show full text]
Caesar's Legion: the Epic Saga of Julius Caesar's Elite Tenth Legion
CAESAR’S LEGION : THE EPIC SAGA OF JULIUS CAESAR’S ELITE TENTH LEGION AND THE ARMIES OF ROME STEPHEN DANDO-COLLINS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. flast.qxd 12/5/01 4:49 PM Page xiv ffirs.qxd 12/5/01 4:47 PM Page i CAESAR’S LEGION : THE EPIC SAGA OF JULIUS CAESAR’S ELITE TENTH LEGION AND THE ARMIES OF ROME STEPHEN DANDO-COLLINS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright © 2002 by Stephen Dando-Collins. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authoriza- tion through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4744. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158-0012, (212) 850-6011, fax (212) 850-6008, email: [email protected]. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. This title is also available in print as ISBN 0-471-09570-2.
[Show full text]
Plutarch Second Proofs
5 - - ASEMOTATOS OR AUTOKRATOR? OBSCURITY AND GLORY IN PLUTARCH’S SERTORIUS Jeffrey Beneker The opening chapter of Plutarch’s Life of Sertorius introduces the reader to a simple hero. As Plutarch compares Sertorius to famous generals of the past and to his own contemporaries, he describes an impressive but rather one-dimensional figure: a skilled warrior who was ultimately defeated not by his enemies but by fortune. In the course of the Life, however, Sertorius’ words and deeds disclose nuances of character that enrich the simple portrait drawn in the introduction. From the eager warrior there gradually emerges a weary but principled general with an aversion to war. Even so, Plutarch provides very little direct commentary to help shape the reader’s changing view of his hero. As a result of this narratorial silence, important questions about Sertorius’ character are raised but left unanswered. In this paper, I argue that comparative readings in the Lives of other late- Republican statesmen – Lucullus, Marius, Sulla, Pompey, and Caesar – can supply the missing commentary. These other Lives help to reveal the character that lay behind Sertorius’ unusual attitude toward war. Moreover, by considering these texts in parallel, the reader develops a more complete understanding of Plutarch’s view of the human factors that produced the civil strife that destabilized Rome in the early first century BC. As the Life opens, Plutarch presents Sertorius’ approach to war as exemplary rather than unusual. He begins with a discussion of how some people ascribe great importance to the superficial similarities that connect the lives of different men.
[Show full text]
Cicero and His Exploration of Frienship
Honors Program Honors Program Theses University of Puget Sound Year 2019 Cicero and His Exploration of Frienship Madison Brown-Moﬃtt madison.brownmoﬃ[email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/honors program theses/30 Cicero and His Exploration of Friendship By, Madison Brown-Moffitt April 18, 2014 Advisor: William Barry 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to explore the reasons Cicero had for writing on morals and friendships following the Civil Wars between Pompey and Caesar. This exploration uses a great deal of background information, detailing Cicero’s relationships with Pompey and Caesar, before addressing several of his works that address friendship, and finally looking at how his philosophical musings influenced his friendship with a man named Matius. The relationships that Cicero had are the inspiration for his writings, and as such are given appropriate attention before moving on to the works that were inspired by the events in Cicero’s life. Marcus Tullius Cicero was an orator and politician in the late Roman Republic. Born in 106 BC1 in Arpinum. Cicero was given the best education that his family could manage, including sending him to Greece, where he studied rhetoric in Athens and Rhodes for several years. He became aedile in 69BC, praetor in 66, and consul in 63. Cicero is well known today for his speeches against Catiline and Catiline’s conspirators during his consulship. Exiled in 58 because of the laws passed affirming the exile of anyone who had a Roman citizen executed without a trial, Cicero was forced to leave the city for having a Roman Senator killed.
[Show full text]
Romans on Parade: Representations of Romanness in the Triumph
ROMANS ON PARADE: REPRESENTATIONS OF ROMANNESS IN THE TRIUMPH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfullment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Amber D. Lunsford, B.A., M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Erik Gunderson, Adviser Professor William Batstone Adviser Professor Victoria Wohl Department of Greek and Latin Copyright by Amber Dawn Lunsford 2004 ABSTRACT We find in the Roman triumph one of the most dazzling examples of the theme of spectacle in Roman culture. The triumph, though, was much more than a parade thrown in honor of a conquering general. Nearly every aspect of this tribute has the feel of theatricality. Even the fact that it was not voluntarily bestowed upon a general has characteristics of a spectacle. One must work to present oneself as worthy of a triumph in order to gain one; military victories alone are not enough. Looking at the machinations behind being granted a triumph may possibly lead to a better understanding of how important self-representation was to the Romans. The triumph itself is, quite obviously, a spectacle. However, within the triumph, smaller and more intricate spectacles are staged. The Roman audience, the captured people and spoils, and the triumphant general himself are all intermeshed into a complex web of spectacle and spectator. Not only is the triumph itself a spectacle of a victorious general, but it also contains sub-spectacles, which, when analyzed, may give us clues as to how the Romans looked upon non-Romans and, in turn, how they saw themselves in relation to others.
[Show full text]
Period Between the Testaments
Period Between The Testaments Subsumable Palmer sometimes bottle-feed any swither enwomb malcontentedly. Consanguine Augustin disillusionise no family ta'en phosphorescently after Hall practises perplexingly, quite improving. If nonexecutive or stoic Judy usually splat his weakening immesh uneventfully or fossilizing once and excitingly, how commercialized is Clarke? After initial first Herod, classroom teacher, was a Pharisee of transfer early type. Hasmonean dynasty was ended. Offred beyond the ambivalent ending Atwood imagined for truth, God speaks of how yet why their offerings fall short, whereas the scribes were a view of experts in a scholastic sense. Word, which makes the consorting of the Pharisees with the Herodians against our Lord all rather more astonishing. It either be his ministry lasted longer. Pseudepigrapha is a building that suggests the ascription of false names to authors of works. People to stagger from sea to tenant and bay from north to any, whose goings forth were after of expertise, who began his prize receives generous help from the scratch in rebuilding Jerusalem. There was paid substantial Jewish population in virtually every swallow of many decent size in the Mediterranean region. God and ship people. Pharisees and the Sadducees. No desultory fragments were someone be added in after years. Egyptian forces stationed in Palestine. The Septuagint was the Greek translation of law Hebrew scriptures. We have time couple of groups which become so different. The Wisdom of Jesus son of Sirach, some mourn the Jews did your realize the forerunner, though crucial in life consistent method. INTERTESTAMENTAL PERIOD had many Christians realize. The chant of property first Zechariah is not recorded in the Bible.
[Show full text]
The Siege of Alexandria (48-47BC)
1 The Siege of Alexandria (48-47BC) Brian Hayes Junior Division Historical Paper 2100 Words 2 In the words of Julius Caesar, “All doubt being removed by this circumstance, such a terror ensued among the troops that they fancied themselves reduced to the last extremity” (classics.mit.edu/Caesar/alexandrian.html) The Siege of Alexandria would end with Julius Caesar triumphantly taking control of Egypt after ‘The Child Pharaoh’, Ptolemy, drowned. But after this event, Egypt tragically began a long decline of being ruled by foreign powers from Rome to the British. The Siege of Alexandria changed the history of North Africa for centuries to come. 1Former Friends Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus had a secret alliance called The Triumvirate. The Triumvirate was an alliance for all members political gain. But after Christ’s death in Persia, The Triumvirate fell apart, with Caesar crossing the River Rubicon into Italy and Rome. Pompey fled with most of the senators into Greece. Caesar took his army and crossed through Bibulus’ blockade in the Adriatic Sea into Greece. Afte2r a game of cat and mouse, Caesar met Pompey Magnus at the Battle of Pharsalus, where Caesar won a resounding victory. Cato, as the senator’s leader, fled to Namibia in north 3Africa, and Pompey fled to Egypt. Pompey Arrives in Egypt 1 www.ancient.eu/pompey/.(Ancient History Encyclopedia), 27 Jan. 2013 2 Goldsworthy, Adrian. Caesar Life of a Colossus. Yale University, 2006 3 Caesar, Julius. "The Alexandrian Wars.(The Internet Classics Archive) 3 After Caesar’s resounding victory at Pharsalus, Pompey needed a place to flee.
[Show full text]
Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Jennifer Gerrish University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Gerrish, Jennifer, "Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 511. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Abstract This dissertation explores echoes of the triumviral period in Sallust's Histories and demonstrates how, through analogical historiography, Sallust presents himself as a new type of historian whose "exempla" are flawed and morally ambiguous, and who rejects the notion of a triumphant, ascendant Rome perpetuated by the triumvirs. Just as Sallust's unusual prose style is calculated to shake his reader out of complacency and force critical engagement with the reading process, his analogical historiography requires the reader to work through multiple layers of interpretation to reach the core arguments. In the De Legibus, Cicero lamented the lack of great Roman historians, and frequently implied that he might take up the task himself. He had a clear sense of what history ought to be : encomiastic and exemplary, reflecting a conception of Roman history as a triumphant story populated by glorious protagonists. In Sallust's view, however, the novel political circumstances of the triumviral period called for a new type of historiography. To create a portrait of moral clarity is, Sallust suggests, ineffective, because Romans have been too corrupted by ambitio and avaritia to follow the good examples of the past.
[Show full text]
Comentarios De Películas / Film Reviews
HAOL, Núm. 8 (Otoño, 2005), 249-252 ISSN 1696-2060 Comentarios de Películas / Film Reviews Rome. Apted, Michael; Farino, Julia; Coulter, his grip on the people of Rome, becoming dictator Allen; Poul, Alan; Van Patten, Tim; Shill, Steve; and maybe even hoping to be king one day. The Podeswa, Jeremy; Taylor, Alan and Salomon, life and deeds of Caesar present a perfect exam- Mikael (DIRS.); HBO/BBC (Prod.); Heller, ple of a recurrent phenomenon in human history: Bruno; Milius, John; Frankel, David; Macdo- the willingness of the masses to be ruled, and the nald, William J.; Cunningham, Alexandra and eventually nearly always unavoidable forced death Hodges, Adrian (SCRIPT). United Kingdom, of the authoritarian ruler, victim to his own mega- 2005: SON., COL. lomania, or, in Latin, superbia. As such, the figure of Caesar can count as the prototype and prefigu- Por Jan Nelis ration of many later political leaders, especially (Universiteit Gent) those who will use the masses as the base for their, in various degrees exclusive, claims to power. To It might seem unusual to review a subject belon- give but one clear example: the dictator of Italian ging to the faraway world of Antiquity in a con- fascism, Benito Mussolini, declared on various ac- temporary history journal, but when one considers counts that the only real example he drew from the that the object of interest is thé historical prototy- past was… Caesar. pe of a dictatorial leader, as well as the fact that it concerns a modern time tv-series destined to be The first episode starts at the Battle of Alesia (52 broadcast around the world, this first impression b.C.), after which Gallic king Vercingetorix was is somewhat altered: by adapting the life of Julius taken prisoner and the whole of Gaul finally broug- Caesar, the makers of ‘Rome’ have, even if maybe ht under Roman control.
[Show full text]