DOCSLIB.ORG

Part II He of 22 June 1962 (1016Th Meeting): Rejection of the Draft Resolution Submitted by Ireland 1962. To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part II He of 22 June 1962 (1016Th Meeting): Rejection of the Draft Resolution Submitted by Ireland 1962. To Part II 199 elections and the formation of the new Government. take all possible measures to ensure the creation He further stated that there was no threat or use of and maintenance of an atmosphere favourable to the force against Pakistan from India. On numerous promotion of negotiations; (4) urge the two Govern- occasions the Government of India had offered to ments to refrain from making any statements, or tak- enter into a no-war declaration with Pakistan. Thus ing any action, which might aggravate the situation; an atmosphere free from any apprehension would be and (5j request the Secretary-General to provide the created in order to facilitate the holding of any nego- two Governments with such services as they might tiations or discussions between India and Pakistan request for the purpose of carrying out the terms of for the settlement of the issue. India’s basic policy this resolution, was to seek all avenues of peaceful settlement in the At the same meeting, the Irish draft resolution vacating of the aggression.fi/There had been an failed of adoption. There were 7 votes in favour and aggression against India in Kashmir, since Kashmir 2 against, with 2 abstentions (one ofthenegative votes was an integral part of India. However, this aggression being that of a permanent member) .9 was to be vacated by peaceful means. The Prime Minister of India had repeatedly stated that India was not going to take any military measures in the LETTER OF 8 MARCH 1962 FROM THE REPRE- Kashmir area under Pakistan occupation. There was SENTATIVE OF CUBA CONCERNING THE PUNTA no desire in the Government of India to settle the DEL ESTE DECISIONS differences with Pakistan by any but peaceful means and by negotiations.3 IXITI4L PROCE EDIKGS By letter= dated 8 March 1962 addressed to the The President (United States) stated that from the statements made before the Council by the represen- President of the Security Council, the representative tatives of Pakist‘an and India it was apparent thAt they of Cuba complained that certain resolutions adopted at the Eighth Meeting of Consultation of Ninisters of desired to deal with their differences on the Kashmir Foreign Affairs of the American Republics, held at issue in a peaceful manner. In the light of those as- Punta de1 Este, violatid the Charter-of the Uni$ed surances, and of the comments made before the Nations, and that subsequently “unlawful enforcement Council, any further consideration by the Council had been taken against Cuba without the should be deferred, possibly until some time after action” 1 March, on the understanding that it would be re- requisite authorization of the Security Council under sumed after consultation between members of the Article 53 of the Charter. These coercive measures Council and the parties concerned. Meanwhile, he constituted aggression against the sovereignty of Cuba concluded, the parties should refrain from any use arill were a serious threat to international peace and or threat of the use of force in connexion with this sel:urity. Accordingly, the Cuban Government asked problem, and from any action which might increase for an immediate meeting of the Security Council to existing tensions.3 request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on several specific legal questions related to the decisions taken by the Eighth Meeting Decision of 22 June 1962 (1016th meeting): Rejection of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs. of the draft resolution submitted by Ireland It further requested the Council to call, as a provi- The Security Council resumed its consideration of sional measure under Article 40 of the Charter, the question at its 1007th meeting on 21 April 1962. for the suspension by the Council of the Organization The opening statement by the representative of of American States of the agreements adopted at Pakistan was made at the 1007th and lOOWhmeetings, Punta de1 Este. The Cuban request was based on and the opening statement by the representative of Article 65 of the Statute of the International Court of India at the 1009th meeting. Discussion continued Justice and Articles 24 (l), 34, 35 (l), 40, 41, 52, 53, through the 1016th meeting. 96 and 103 of the Charter, and the relevant provisions of the rules of procedure of the Council. At the 1016th meeting on 22 June 1962, the repre- sentative of Ireland introduced a draft resolutionw At the 992nd meeting on 14 March 1962, the Coun- under which, after noting with satisfaction the pledges cil included the question in its agenda.3 It con- made by the two parties to the effect that their Gov- sidered the Cuban complaint at the 992nd to 998th ernments would not resort to force in settling this meetings held between 14 and 23 March 1962. The question, the Security Council would: (1) remind both President (Venezuela) invited the representative of parties of the principles contained in its resolution Cuba to participate in the discussion.4’s1 of 17 January 1948, and in the United Kations Com- mission for India and Pakistan (CSCIP) resolutions Decision of 23 March 1962 (998th meeting): Rejection of 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949; (2) urge the of the Cuban draft resolution parties concerned to enter into negotiations at the At the 992nd meeting on 14 March 1962, the repre- earliest convenient time with a view to the ultimate sentative of Cuba* contended that the Eighth Meeting settlement of the India-Pakistxn question, in accord- of Consultation of Punta de1 Este had been illegally ance with Article 33 and other relevant provisions convened, and that it had adopted collective enforce- of the Charter; (3) appeal to the two Governments to ment measures which could not be implemented with- m See chapter S, Case e. 4,2/ 990th meeting: paras. $3-87, 93-95, 102-l 11. 5.2 lOlcti+ meetirig: pra. 32. 4;3[ 990th meeting: paras. 113-115. 59 S/3X0, O.K., 17th year, Scp~l. for Jan.-slarch 1902, pp. rj8-‘:‘1. 474/’ S/5134, O.R., 17th year, Suppl. for Aprd-Jur,e 1962, p. 104; 42 932r.C meeUng: pra. 3. 101~2th meet1r.g: paras. 3-l@. 23 932r.d meetlEg: para. 4. 200 Chapter VIII. Maintenance of international peace and security out the approval of the Security Council.-% He as- At the 995th meeting on 20 March 1962, the Presi- serted that under the United Nations Charter, socialist dent (Venezuela) 484/ called attention to a letter dated and capitalist nations were united, thus proclaiming 19 March 1962 from the representative of Cuba trans- peaceful co-existence. The United Nations was the mitting a draft resolution, A% submitted in accord- international forum where countries with different ance with rule 38 of the rules of procedure. Under social and political systems met. He stated further the terms of the draft resolution, the Security Council that the social system of a State was a matter essen- would request the International Court of Justice to tially within its domestic jurisdiction, and that under give an advisory opinion on the seven following Article 2 (7) of the Charter not even the United Kations questions: was authorized to intervene in matters which were 0i Whether the Organization of American States essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any was a regional agency within the meaning of State, He concluded by requesting that, pending the Chapter VIII of the United Kations Charter; opinion of the International Court, the Council should (ii) Whether, under the terms of. the Charter, the resolve to suspend the decisions of Punta de1 Este.48 0.4s had the right to take enforcement action as provided for in Article 53 without the au- At the 993rd meeting on 15 March 1962, the repre- thorization of the Security Council; sentative of the USSR observed that there were well- (iii) Whether the term “enforcement action” in founded legal reasons for the Security Col:ncil to take Article 53 was to be regarded as including the the matter before the Internat.onal Court because measures provided for in Article 41, and whether serious differences had appeared at the previous the list of measures in Article 41 was exhaustive; meetings of the Council and the General Assembly Whether the Charter of the OAS included any in the views expressed about these legalquestions.!% procedure for the expulsion of a State member of that organization, particularly because of its At the same meeting the representative of the United States observed that it was the third time in social system; two and a half months that the United &&ions had ( V ) Whether the provisions of the Charte-r of the been called upon to discuss complaints by Cuba which OAS and of the Inter-American Treaty ofaRe- were essentially alike, He contended that the only ciprocal Assistance (Rio Treaty) were to be difference in the current complaint was that its ob- regarded as having precedence over the obliga- jective was to extend the Soviet veto to all regional tions of Member States under the United Nations organizations by way of the Security Council. Henoted Charter; Whether it was one of the main principles of further that while the Cuban complaint might have ( vi 1 been formulated in juridical terms, it was actually the Charter of the United Nations that member- ship in the Organization was open to States political. In his view, the principal issue was which complied with the requirements of Ar- “whether a regional organization, one which has kicle 4, regardless of their social system; co-operated fully with the United Nations, has the (vii) Whether, in the light of the replies to the fore- right to manage its own affairs and to defend
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inventory for Campaign 1962 Collection
    Campaign 1962 Collection Inventory (**Materials in bold type are currently available for research) Campaign. 1962. Press Clippings on Pat Brown (PPS 82) Box 1 (1 of 3) No title. Clippings and printed material. No title. Clippings. Brown, Pat. Typescript and printed. Box 2 : [Unprocessed. No folder separation of materials.] Box 3 : [Unprocessed. No folder separation of materials.] Campaign. 1962. (California). Campaign literature (printed and miscellaneous). (PPS 83) [Unprocessed. No. folder separation of materials.] 2 FRC Boxes. Campaign. 1962. (California). “Key” program file. (PPS 84) Box 1 (1 of 1) : [Papers pertaining to membership of program and reports concerning news coverage of campaign with press clippings.] Campaign. 1962. (California). Research files (PPS 85) Box 1 (1 of 3) Agnes - Memorandum. Agnes -Correspondence. Barber, Carter Brewer, Roy Campaign: Suggestions and themes Budget. Counties – Background sheets. Election – Forecast. Box 2 : Facts – Consolidated. Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum [email protected] Lubell, Samuel Possible issues. Republican Research Center. Republicans – Slate and Platform. RSCC and Other Releases. Box 3 Academic Steering Committee. Accountant and Task Force. Agriculture Task Force. Education Task Force. Welfare Task Force. Task Forces – General. GOP (Truth Squad). Vote Analyses. Scholars for Nixon. Campaign. 1962. (California). Research Files (PPS 86) Box 1 (1 of 3) Farmers for Nixon. RN – Personal. RN – Image. Meetings with Staff. Nixon, Mrs. Press Conferences. Miscellaneous. Polls. Box 2 RN – Programs for Progress. RN – Propaganda. RN – Queries and Questionaires (from outside). RN – News Media (Interviews, briefings, etc.). Nixon – Remarks – California. 1960. Box 3 RN – Schedules. RN – Six Crises. RN – Smears. RN – Statements (Miscellaneous). Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum [email protected] Tapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Commandant's Annual Report, 1961-1962
    COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT 1961 ... 1962 The Judge Advocate General's School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia FOREWORD It is with great pleasure and much satisfaction that I present the Commandant's Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1962. Al­ though this represents the first report of this type published by The Judge Advocate General's School, it is intended that it become an integral feature in chronicling the continuing development of the Army's military law center. The report has a three-fold purpose: --- 1. To summarize the operations of the School during the past fiscal year. ---------2. To preserve in printed form a record of the School, its staff and faculty, students, and enlisted personnel. ~ To describe the various courses of instruction offered at - The Judge Advocate General's School. ThiE report reflects continued progress on the part of The Judge Advocate General's School. The value of any educational institution, however, is measured by how well it prepares its student body for the roles which await them upon graduation. Accordingly, our goal, as in the past, is to increase and make more effective our services to the Army by thorough preparation of officers for service in the Judge Advocate General's Corps. JOHN F. T. MURRAY Colonel, J AGC Commandant i COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I -The Judge Advocate General's School Today ....................... 1 Mission ............... 1 History ..... 3 Section II -Organization of The Judge Advocate General's School ............ .......... 5 Academic Department ................ 5 Nonresident Training Department 5 Research and Publications Department 5 Office of School Secretary .
    [Show full text]
  • Money Supply in Five Countries
    November 1964 November 1964 ANK OF ST. LOUIS mMtmmn evtew jarfiaiiiiwiii CONTENTS Money Supply in Five Page Money Supply in Five ill: ' fill; Countries, 1951-1964.. 1 lift; Countries, 1951-1964 1 Production and Money i i ® i l l -ONEY SUPPLY STATISTICS1 for five leading industrial na­ Expand Rapidly—with neither Price Inflation tions are presented in the accompanying tables and charts. It is nor interest Rate In­ hoped that readers may find the data, presented in the manner creases outlined below, more useful than in their original form.2 Although Employment and Popula­ the major interest in studying money supply behavior lies in relat­ tion Trends in the Cen­ ing it to economic activity, this has not been done in this pre­ tra Mississippi Valley 10 liminary article.3 However, readers who have followed the finan­ cial history of the respective countries may find that they can Economic Indicators—St. infer the causes of variation in the rate of change of money supply Louis and Louisville.. 15 from time to time or the possible economic effects of this variation. According to one view, monetary policy is “policy employing the central bank's control of the supply of money as an instru­ ment for achieving the objectives of general economic policy/ 4 It is not assumed in this article that any or all of these countries at any or all times necessarily sought to achieve a certain increase or decrease in the money supply. Rather, money supply data are presented in a manner that may be more readily used by any who think that money supply changes may be one useful ex post indi- 1 Data for the four foreign countries are derived from International Financial Statis­ Volume 46 • Number 11 tics, published by the International Monetary Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • November 3, 1964 Issue (Dig110364.Pdf)
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION i~JlW~ IDU@JI~tr , A brief summary of fincmciol prQpOSCIls filed with and actions by the S.E.e. Washington 25, D.C. (In .,eI.r"" .... t... .f ••1..... fro. ,,,lIlIc.t'... Ulllt, cit. II".II.r) I (Issue Ro. 64-11-2) FOR RELEASE Rovember 3. 1964 FIRST AMIItICAR TITLE IRS. "LIS FOI OFFERIRG AlO) SECONDARY. First Aaerican Title lnauranc:e & fruit Company. 421 R. ~in St., Santa Ana. Calif., filed a regiatration state.-nt (File 2-22892) with the SEC on :November 2 seeking regiatration of 250,107 sharea of capital stock. Of these shares, 175,107 are to be offered for public sale by the preaent bolders thereof aDd 75,000 by the cOlllpany. The offering is to b... de through underwriters h.aded by Dean Witter & Co., 632-4 S. Sprinl St., Loa Anleles. The public offerinl price ($17 per ahare 8I8Xt..*) and uDclerwritinl terms are to be supplied by aaemt.ent. The ca.pany is enl&led principally in the title insurance business and related activities. Ret proceeds from ita aale of additional atock will be used to increase working capital and to pay portiona of outstanding notes (agarel&ting $666,723) issued in connection with acquiaition of interesta in 14 title insurance com- paniea since 1957. The company has outstandinl 768,516 common shares, as adjusted to reflect a 3-for-l aplit to be effected in Rove"r. Management officials as a Iroup own 331 of the outstaDding stock. The prospec- tus lists 14 selling stockholders, including Christiana Oil Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Covering the Period, 1 July 1962 - 30 .Rune 1963
    WP/RC14/2 THE WORK OF WHO IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC REGION THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR TO THE REGIONAL COMMI'I"I'EE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC Covering the Period, 1 July 1962 - 30 .rune 1963 World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific Mmila, Philippines July, 1963 The following abbreviations are used in this Report: ECAFE Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations MESA Malaria Eradication Special Account UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization United Nations Korean Reconstruction ~ncy UNTEA United Nations Temporary Executive Authority - ii - - CONTENTS JNTRODUCTION .......................... ,. .... iii ............................ vii PART I. GENERAL 1. TliE REGIONAL CO~'fl1EE .................... It ........ '. .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. 3 2.. TlIE REGIONAL OFFICE .. .. .. .. • .. • .. • • • .. .. .. • .. • .. .. • • .. • • • • • .. .. • • • • • • • • • • • 4 2.1 Organizational Structure 4 2.2 Salaries and Allowances 5 2.3 Regional Office Building 5 3. AGREEMENTS WITH GOVERNMENTS •••.•.•.•......••.•••..•.••.•.•• 6 4. CO-ORDINATION OF WORK WITH OTlIER ORGANIZATIONS •••.••••••••. 6 4.1 The United Nations and the Specialized Agencies •••••• .6 4.1.1 United Nations Temporary Executive Authority •• 7 4.1.2 t.JN'ICEF" • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • '.' .. • • • • 7 4.1.3 Technical Assistance Board/ United Nations Special Fund
    [Show full text]
  • US Intervention During the Bretton Wood Era: 1962–1973
    working 11 08 paper U.S. Intervention during the Bretton Wood Era: 1962–1973 Michael D. Bordo, Owen F. Humpage, and Anna J. Schwartz FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND Working papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded offi cial Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views stated herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Working papers are available at: www.clevelandfed.org/research. Working Paper 11-08 April 2011 U.S. Intervention during the Bretton Wood Era: 1962–1973 by Michael D. Bordo, Owen F. Humpage, and Anna J. Schwartz By the early 1960s, outstanding U.S. dollar liabilities began to exceed the U.S. gold stock, suggesting that the United States could not completely maintain its pledge to convert dollars into gold at the offi cial price. This raised uncertainty about the Bretton Woods parity grid, and speculation seemed to grow. In re- sponse, the Federal Reserve instituted a series of swap lines to provide central banks with cover for unwanted, but temporary accumulations of dollars and to provide foreign central banks with dollar funds to fi nance their own interven- tions. The Treasury also began intervening in the market. The operations often forestalled gold losses, but in so doing, delayed the need to solve Bretton Woods’ fundamental underlying problems.
    [Show full text]
  • June 1962 Fifty Cents Rev. Robert W. Wood, Speaker At
    ’ - W 5: - — - “5^ .: JUNE 1962 FIFTY CENTS REV. ROBERT W. WOOD, SPEAKER AT NINTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE No ^Pctiag« Stonip^ Nocwiary , tf Maitod in tho ¡ k Unkad StstMi BUSINESS REPLY CARD irt CtoM PwmK N*. lltn Sm . 14J r.l-ftR., ton Franclfco, Mattachine ^cittg, Inc. 693 MISSION STREET SAN FRANCISCOS, CALIFORNIA ' fllattadiine 3nc. HELPING TO SUP FORT THE WORK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS OF THE MATTACHINE SOCIETY 4 ,3 ^ ¡ „ ¡ 0 0 Straot - Son F«.ncUeo 5. Colifornin WITH A MONTHLY PLEDGE IS NOT ^ - DOING IT THE HARD WAY Why not start your monthly pledge NOW. Just fill out this slip and return it. We will send your statement as indicated. Name;_ Aldress: Qtv: . State:. Send statement on lst( ), 10th ( ), 20th ( ) of month. Signed:_______________________________________ WHY THIS ISSUE IS LATE For the first time in many months, Mattachine REVIEW appears late in a curtailed edition Tor subscribers only. Newsstand circulatioir has been omit- this month. m attacliiiié During the entire month of IVby, the facilities of Pan-Graphic Press, print­ ers of the REVIEW, have been utilized to the utmost on a special project of naitEwnEEXiy significance to the homophile world; the printing of a mammoth legal brief Fouadad in 1954-First Issue January 1955 for a court action in California. Volume Vnij JUNE 1962 Number 6 This action, the case of Sol Stoumen v. Russell Munro and the Department of Alcoholic-"Beverage Control of the State of California, was filed in the Editor District Court of Appeal, first appellate district, San Francisco, on June 8 HAROLD L. CALL by Morris Lowenthal and Juliet Lowenthal, attorneys for petitioner and ap­ A$$oci^9 Editor pellant.
    [Show full text]
  • Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commission General Records
    • CAROLINA CHARTER TERCENTENARY COMMISSION GENERAL RECORDS Accession information: Transferred from the State Records Center on March 5, 1973; April 26, 1973; and January 9, 1974; accessioned by the Archives on March 26, 1973; May 29, 1973, and January 9, 1974. Schedule references: Inventories of State Agencies, Division of Archives and History, page 32, item 4; page 33, items 5 and 8; and page 34, items 9, 11, and 12. Arrangement: See description of contents below. Finding Aid prepared by the History 552 class , North Carolina State University, Spring Semester, 1974; consolidated on November 15, 1974. The Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commission was established by the 1959 General Assembly to develop and execute a program for the celebration of the tercentenary of the Carolina Charter of 1663.1 A commission comprised of twenty-five members was created by the legis­ lature. Twenty-two of the commission ' s members were to be appointed by the governor to serve two-year terms, and the remaining three ex officio members were the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, and the Director of the Department of Archives and History.2 Of major significance was the commission's decision to broaden • the scope of the tercentenary celebration to encompass the first one hundred years of North Carolina ' s existence. The commission decided to expand the time period from 1663 to 1763 for several reasons. First, no suitable focus in terms of geography or time existed in North Caro­ lina to sustain a year long celebration for the year 1663. 3 Secondly, the development of North Carolina was a slow process.
    [Show full text]
  • CG/2 TARIFFS and TRADE 18 June 1962
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON CG/2 18 1962 TARIFFS AND TRADE LimitedJune Distribution Group on Meat INTERNATIONALTRADE IN CATTLE ANDSHEEP MEAT The Council at its session from 22 to 28 February 1962 agreed to establish a Group on Meat composed of Argentina, Australia, EEC, New Zealand, United Kingdom, UnitedStates and Uruguay. The terms of reference of the Group are those set down by the Ministers in their recommendations in respect of trade in agricultural products: "to establish the basis for the negotiation of practical measures for the creation of acceptable conditions of access to world markets". The Council agreed that in the first instance the problems to be studied by the Group would relate to trade in meat of cattle and sheep. It was, however, understood that during the course of the work of the Group it might be found desirable to vary somewhat the scope of the study, for example by examining also the market situation in some related products, in which case other countries principally interested in the trade in those products might be asked to join the Group, The Council agreed that the secretariat should prepare for distribution a factual paper on international trade in cattle and sheep meat, including appropriate references to the findings of Committee II. The paper prepared by the secretariat and distributed under the symbol L/1772 was discussed in a preparatory meeting of the members of the Group on Meat from 21 to 23 May 1962. The present document is a revised version of document L/1772, prepared by the secretariat taking into account the comments made and the views expressed at that meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 CONFERENCE of the EIGHTEEN-NATION COMMITTEE
    ,:ll PRIVdTA wtDc/62 I coHrrnrilcE 0F n{E EtGHTEEru-Hnrroil c0MMITTEE 7 Septenbor 1962 OII DISARiIAMENT ENGLISE Orlglnal: E{GIISS-HJSSIAAT e@oRf T0 Tm ufltm Nduo$s The Couferaace of tbe l8-Ne,tion Gomnittee on nisarnanent transmits hetesith to ihe Unit eil Natione Disa,rrnament Cormission anil to the l?tb SessLon of tbe GeaeraJ' Assenbly a, seconil iaterin pxogress raporb on the Conforence ileliberatious for t'he period I Juoe 1962 to 8 Septeober L962. I. 0rgsJd.zetiou of Confereuce A. Particip,a'ot s in the Confereoce Repreeent'atives of the fotJ.oriag stotes contioued ibeir pertlcipation in the rork of the Connittae: Brazil, Bu1garia, Burtra, CaJxadE, CzechosLovakial tlhiopia, Inilial ltaly, ie:r-ico, Nigeria, Polanil, Ronania, Sweilen, Union of Soriet Socialisi Bepublics, United Arab Bepubl-ic, Uniteil Klngdon of Great Brita.in antl i{orthero Irela.od., and the United States of .Anerica. ]. .6t its 47th neeiiag on l- June 1962, the Conference d.ecid.eit to recess fron. 15 June to 16 July 1962. 2, At iis 5fth ueeting on 16 Juty 1962, the Cou.ferencs ailopteil certain aiklitionar pro corlural amangements recomenileil by ibe C o-{ba"irnen (m{I)Cr/f /Ad.a. e1x coocercning the. nulber of neetings of the ful.l Co4leittee to be hekl e&cb wsek alxal the scbeilule of those meeti-ugs aoil a.ny subcomlttee neetings. 3. At its 60th xoeeting on 24 July 19621 thq Conference a,ilopted further reconnenrtaiions by tha Co-{hairnen concerniog. the procedu-ro of rork of the Committee on the first sta,ge of a treaty on denera,I and col4:lete disarma,Bent (EWA/Add.3)*.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNE 1962 the President'spage
    ( JUNE 1962 the president'spage OU MAY THINK it is ridiculous for anyone to ask exist. Under our free competitive system, a business Yyou whether or not you want people in Washing­ that expects to prosper must give you what you want ton to set your wages, tell you where to work, at a price you are willing to pay-and that's the best choose careers for your children, determine what mer­ kind of economic control ever invented. chandise will be available to you, fix the prices you Think of the situation from your own standpoint as may pay-all in the name of what Washington offi­ a member of Western's retirement plan or as an in• cials consider to be the best national policy. dividual saver . If you acquire part interest in an in­ This is the question, nevertheless, that constituted dustrial firm by purchasing its common stock, you the fundamental issue in the recent steel crisis, when want that company's operations to yield enough an angry man in the White House clashed with an profit so that it can pay 52 % of this profit to the federal impolitic one in the head office of United States Steel. government and lesser percentages to state and local Why do we make such a seemingly far-fetched governments, accumulate sufficient funds for growth statement? Simply because freedom is indivisible. and for security during a stormy period, and still History and logic both teach us that freedom cannot have enough left to pay a worth-while return on your be doled out to some groups or institutions and with­ investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol Relating to an Amendment to the Convention on International Civil Aviation
    PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 50(a), SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 21 JUNE 1961 Entry into force: The Protocol entered into force on 17 July 1962. Status: 136 parties. State Date of deposit of instrument of ratification Algeria 29 November 1965 Andorra (4) 25 February 2001 Angola 10 April 1977 Antigua and Barbuda 17 October 1988 Argentina 19 November 1963 Australia 19 January 1962 Austria 17 July 1962 Bahamas 25 July 1975 Bahrain 1 November 1971 Belarus 24 July 1996 Belgium 15 February 1962 Benin 30 March 1962 Bosnia and Herzegovina 7 March 1995 Brazil 6 March 1969 Brunei Darussalam 25 August 2000 Bulgaria 16 December 1969 Burkina Faso 8 September 1965 Cameroon 14 November 1961 Canada 17 October 1961 Central African Republic 22 May 1962 Chad 28 August 1964 Chile 20 December 1967 China (1) 28 February 1974 Congo 26 May 1962 Cook Islands 29 August 2005 Costa Rica 9 January 1964 Côte d’Ivoire 14 November 1961 Croatia 5 October 1993 Cuba 29 October 1962 Cyprus 31 July 1962 Czech Republic 15 April 1993 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 27 June 1978 Denmark 15 May 1962 Dominica (10) 14 March 2019 Dominican Republic 24 October 1961 Ecuador 11 January 1965 Egypt 27 February 1962 El Salvador 22 January 1963 Eritrea 6 June 1995 Estonia 21 August 1992 Eswatini 31 January 1974 Ethiopia 23 January 1963 Fiji 4 April 1973 Finland 18 September 1961 France 20 November 1962 Gabon 4 February 2014 Gambia 25 January 1978 Germany 16 August 1962 Article 50(a) - 2 - 21 June 1961 State Date of deposit
    [Show full text]