DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts State Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts State Rail Plan Massachusetts State Rail Plan Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Jeffrey B. Mullan, Secretary & Chief Executive Officer Richard A. Davey, Administrator, Rail & Transit Division prepared for Massachusetts Department of Transportation prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. 695 Atlantic Ave, Second Floor Boston, MA 02111 September 2010 Massachusetts State Rail Plan Acknowledgements This comprehensive rail plan for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was funded by and prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT). The research, analysis, findings, and plan development were guided by MassDOT staff. The rail plan was developed by a consultant team led by HDR Engineering, Inc. Subcontractors included: HNTB; Economic Development Research Group; Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc.; Portscape; Egan Consulting Group; Transit Safety Management; and Planners Collaborative. The following individuals and organizations assisted in the development of the Massachusetts Rail Plan by providing information, expertise, and facilities: Freight and Rail Plan Working Group Associated Industries of Massachusetts, Brad MacDougall Boston Shipping Association, Richard Meyer Coalition of New England Companies for Trade, Joan M. Padduck CSX Transportation, Maurice O’Connell Federal Express, Robert Quinn Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) – Massachusetts Division, Michael Chong Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies, Timothy Brennan Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), John D. Ray Massachusetts Motor Transportation Association, Anne Lynch Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport), Andrew Hargens and Michael Leone Massachusetts Railroad Association, Michael Rennicke Massachusetts Seaport Advisory Council, Louis Elisa, II Northeast Association of Rail Shippers (NEARS), Joe Gearin Pan Am Railways, Sydney Culliford Providence and Worcester Railroad Company, P. Scott Conti and Marie Angelini UPS, Neal Rossi Regional Planning Agencies Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, Alison Church Cape Cod Commission, Clay Schofield Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission, Richard Rydant Franklin Regional Council of Governments, Maureen Mullaney Merrimack Valley Planning Commission, Anthony Kormornick Metropolitan Area Planning Commission, Eric Bourassa Montachusett Regional Planning Commission, Brad Harris Nantucket Planning & Economic Development Commission, Michael Burns Northern Middlesex Council of Governments, David Ginns Old Colony Planning Council, Charles Kilmer Pioneer Valley Planning Commission, Timothy Brennan Southeastern Regional Planning & Economic Development District, Adam Recchia All report documents can be accessed on the MassDOT web site at: http://www.mass.gov/massdot/freightandrailplan September 2010 Massachusetts State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ..................................................................................................................................... vi Massachusetts State Rail Plan Contents ............................................................................. xx Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Massachusetts State Rail Plan .................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Vision of the Massachusetts State Rail Plan ...................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Goals and Objectives of the Massachusetts State Rail Plan ............................................... 1-3 Chapter 2 Overview of Approach and Methodology .................................................. 2-1 2.1 Data Collection and Analysis ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Public and Stakeholder Participation Process .................................................................... 2-2 Chapter 3 Rail Trends and Issues................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 National and Regional Context .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Freight Rail National Context ........................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.2 Freight Rail Regional Context ....................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.3 Passenger Rail National and Regional Context ............................................................. 3-4 3.2 Benefits of Freight and Passenger Rail in Massachusetts .................................................. 3-6 3.2.1 Energy Impacts .............................................................................................................. 3-7 3.2.2 Environmental Concerns and Carbon Reduction Initiatives .......................................... 3-9 3.3 System Use ....................................................................................................................... 3-10 3.3.1 Overview of Freight Flows and Modal Share .............................................................. 3-11 3.3.1 Statewide Commodity Flow Analysis for Rail ............................................................ 3-14 3.3.2 County and Regional Analysis of Freight Flows ......................................................... 3-20 3.3.3 Freight Flows Forecast, Including Through Traffic .................................................... 3-22 3.3.4 Freight Influences Impacting Future Goods Movement by Rail ................................. 3-27 3.3.5 Rail Capacity Constraints ............................................................................................ 3-28 Chapter 4 Freight Rail System Inventory .................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 System Description ............................................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.1 Statewide Summary ....................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Ownership and Operations ............................................................................................ 4-4 4.2.3 Principal Lines and Facilities in the Commonwealth .................................................. 4-11 4.2.4 Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 4-14 4.3 Freight Rail System Constraints and Opportunities ......................................................... 4-20 4.3.1 Main Line Capacity Constraints .................................................................................. 4-20 4.3.2 Yard Infrastructure and Connectivity .......................................................................... 4-21 4.3.3 Shared Use ................................................................................................................... 4-22 4.3.4 Existing Vertical Clearance Conditions for Intermodal............................................... 4-23 4.3.5 Weight on Rail ............................................................................................................. 4-25 4.4 Freight Rail Opportunities ............................................................................................... 4-27 Chapter 5 Passenger Rail System Inventory ............................................................... 5-1 5.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 System Description ............................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2.1 Statewide Summary ....................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Ownership ...................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 MBTA Commuter Rail Service ......................................................................................... 5-3 i September 2010 Massachusetts State Rail Plan 5.4 Amtrak Intercity Passenger Service ................................................................................... 5-9 5.5 Tourist Railroads .............................................................................................................. 5-16 5.6 Stations and Intermodal Connections............................................................................... 5-18 5.6.1 South Station ................................................................................................................ 5-18 5.6.2 North Station ................................................................................................................ 5-19 5.6.3 Back Bay Station ......................................................................................................... 5-19 5.6.4 Route 128 Southside Station ........................................................................................ 5-19 5.6.5 Anderson Regional Transportation Center .................................................................. 5-19 5.6.6 Worcester Union Station .............................................................................................. 5-19 5.6.7 Springfield Union Station
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Semiannual Report to Congress Go Green!
    Go Green! Consumes less energy than car or air travel* Semiannual Report to Congress Report #41 H 10/01/09 – 3/31/10 ON THE COVER Amtrak® Empire Builder® Message from the Inspector General am pleased to present the first Semiannual Report We made a series of recommendations to improve to Congress since my appointment as Amtrak the effectiveness and efficiency of training and IInspector General in November 2009. In addition employee development, focusing on developing and to reporting on the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) implementing a corporate-wide training and employee accomplishments during the six-month period ending development strategy. This would ensure that training March 31, 2010, I am identifying several significant aligns with the overall corporate strategy and provides challenges the OIG faces and the ongoing and planned employees with the skills needed to assume leadership actions we are pursuing to overcome the challenges. roles in the future. Significant Accomplishments Management recently agreed with all of our recommendations and provided a plan to implement During this semi-annual reporting period, the OIG them. It is important, however, for management to continued to identify opportunities to reduce costs, stay focused on making near-term improvements, improve management operations, enhance revenue, and because effective training and development practices institute more efficient and effective business processes. will be a key component of Amtrak’s ability to deliver For example: high quality services. H An OIG audit of the monthly on time performance H The Office of Investigations was instrumental in (OTP) bills and schedules from April 1993 through securing convictions and restitutions in multiple theft April 2004 disclosed that CSX inaccurately billed schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 FMCB Annual Report
    2020 FMCB Annual Report This report fulfills the requirements of Section 207 of Chapter 46 of the Acts of 2015 specifying that the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) report annually on, among other things, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s “own-source revenue, operating budget, capital plan and progress toward meeting performance metrics and targets.” This final report is presented to the Legislature after five and a half years of governance by the FMCB, with just under six months left in our extended term. 2020 was an extraordinary year, marked by an unprecedented global pandemic, nationwide protests, political and racial tensions, and substantial changes in the ways we live and work. Due to the widespread adoption of teleworking and the closure of hotels, restaurants, and other sectors to slow the spread of COVID-19, MBTA ridership fell sharply. By the end of October, Commuter Rail ridership was down 87% compared to 2019, with the system carrying only 8.5% of its pre- COVID morning peak ridership. Ferry ridership stood at 12% of pre-COVID ridership, with the MBTA paying to operate 112 trips daily with an average of seven riders per trip. Ridership at gated rapid transit (subway) stations was still roughly one-quarter of pre-COVID levels. Even bus ridership, which serves our most durable, transit-dependent customers, had fallen to about 45% of the baseline by October. This decline in ridership, of course, had significant implications for own source revenue. In November 2020, fare revenues were down 78% compared to November 2019. Parking and advertising revenues dropped in line with fares, while real estate revenues remained more stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Freight Movement
    2012 Regional Transportation Plan Freight Movements Montachusett MPO Freight Movements Chapter 8 – Freight Movements FREIGHT MOVEMENTS Introduction An efficient and cost effective system that allows for the movement of freight and services is essential to the economic vitality of the Montachusett Region and Massachusetts. All aspects or components of a transportation network work together in the delivery of these goods. From rail and highways to airports and seaports, maintaining these systems to insure an effective and efficient network produces benefits that often reach beyond the borders of a region and a state. The Commonwealth has developed the Massachusetts Freight Rail Plan (September 2010) which “provides a comprehensive evaluation of the Commonwealth’s freight transportation system, its operations, and its effect on economic development and quality of life.” This chapter will review freight and goods movement from the overall state perspective though the Freight Plan as it relates to the Montachusett Region as well as an examination of regional issues and concerns. The Freight and Rail Plan can be found at the following website: www.massfreightandrailplan.com. Massachusetts Freight Plan The Massachusetts Freight Plan was completed in September 2010 and encompasses all modes of freight within the Commonwealth. A multi disciplined consultant team, examined conditions, issues, policies and impacts to and associated with the economic development and quality of life for the state. Statewide Goals Within the context of MassDOT policies
    [Show full text]
  • South County
    Fairmount Line Corridor Improvements Project MBTA Contract No.G74PS01 Amendment 8 Service Enhancement Study Final Report April 2008 Prepared for: Prepared by: Fairmount Line Service Enhancement Study Introduction and Executive Summary...........................................................................................................2 Methodology.................................................................................................................................................8 1. Kick Off Meeting......................................................................................................................................9 2. Validate and Update Tools: Key Findings.............................................................................................10 2.1. South Station Capacity................................................................................................................10 2.2. Station Dwell Times with High Peak Period Travel Volumes....................................................15 2.3. Equipment Maintenance and Storage Capacity...........................................................................17 3. Develop and Screen Preliminary Options: Key Findings .......................................................................21 3.1. Baseline.......................................................................................................................................21 3.2. Peak Alternatives.........................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Phased Corridor Map
    Home Benefits Programs Environmental Construction Documents Community Engagement Home > Route and Service > Phased Corridor Map Phased Corridor Map Download PDF of the Phased Corridor Map [240 KB] Corridor map for the South Coast Rail project showing the project's phasing plan. Phase 1 will extend the existing Middleborough/Lakeville Commuter Rail Line to provide service to Taunton, New Bedford and Fall River. The Phase 1 route begins at South Station in Boston and continues on the existing Middleborough Main Line to Pilgrim Junction, then follows the Middleborough Secondary to Cotley Junction. The route then continues south and splits into two legs: one leg bound for Fall River following the Fall River Secondary and one leg bound for New Bedford following the New Bedford Main Line. Existing stations and layovers for Phase 1 include South Station, Holbrook/Randolph, Montello, Brockton, Campello, Bridgewater, Middleborough/Lakeville, and Middleborough Layover. Phase 1 includes four new stations: East Taunton, Fall River Depot, King's Highway, and Whale's Tooth; a potential new Middleborough station; and two new layover facilities (Weaver's Cove and Wamsutta). Phase 2 follows the Northeast Corridor from Boston to Canton Junction, then follows the Stoughton Line to Cotley Junction. Existing stations include South Station, Back Bay, Ruggles, Forest Hills, Readville, Route 128, and Canton Junction. Reconstructed stations include Canton Center and Stoughton stations. New stations for phase 2 include: North Easton, Easton Village, Raynham Place, Taunton, Freetown, and Battleship Cove. Powered by Translator | Translation Support MassDOT Home | About Us | Employment | Contact Us | Site Policies Copyright © 2017 Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • KEEPING on TRACK Our Second Progress Report on Reforming and Funding Transportation Since Passage of the Massachusetts Transportation Finance Act of 2013
    KEEPING ON TRACK Our Second Progress Report on Reforming and Funding Transportation Since Passage of the Massachusetts Transportation Finance Act of 2013 Written by Produced by Rafael Mares Kirstie Pecci FEBRUARY 2015 KEEPING ON TRACK Our Second Progress Report on Reforming and Funding Transportation Since Passage of the Massachusetts Transportation Finance Act of 2013 Rafael Mares, Conservation Law Foundation Kirstie Pecci, MASSPIRG Education Fund February 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMentS The authors thank the following MassDOT; Rani Murali, former Intern, individuals for contributing information Transportation for Massachusetts; or perspectives for this report: Jeannette Orsino, Executive Director, Andrew Bagley, Director of Research Massachusetts Association of Regional and Public Affairs, Massachusetts Transit Authorities; Martin Polera, Office Taxpayers Foundation; Paula of Real Estate and Asset Development, Beatty, Deputy Director of Budget, MBTA; Richard Power, Legislative MBTA; Taryn Beverly, Legal Intern, Director, MassDOT; Janice E. Ramsay, Conservation Law Foundation; Matthew Director of Finance Policy and Analysis, Ciborowski, Project Manager, Office MBTA; and Mary E. Runkel, Director of of Transportation Planning, MassDOT; Budget, MBTA. Jonathan Davis, Chief Financial Officer, MBTA; Thom Dugan, former Deputy This report was made possible thanks Chief Financial Officer & Director, to generous support from the Barr Office of Management and Budget, Foundation. MassDOT; Kristina Egan, Director, Transportation for Massachusetts; Adriel © 2015 Transportation for Massachusetts Galvin, Supervisor of Asset Systems Development, MassDOT; Scott Hamwey, The authors bear responsibility for any Manager of Long-Range Planning, factual errors. The views expressed in Office of Transportation Planning, this report are those of the authors and MassDOT; Dana Levenson, Assistant do not reflect the views of our funders Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, or those who provided review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Federal Express and Its Founder Fred Smith
    A Review of OVERNIGHT SUCCESS: FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ITS RENEGADE CREATOR by Vance Trimble reviewed by Bernhard Reichert INTRODUCTION This article is divided in two parts. The first part discusses common traits of new business ventures. The second, and major part, is the story of Federal Express and its founder Fred Smith. The primary source of the discussion of Federal Express is Vance Trimble’s Overnight Success.1 A REVIEW OF SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS VENTURES There seems to be a pattern exhibited by successful new companies which they seem to have in common: Communication: The management style in new companies is very informal. Communication and work organization is easy going. Work responsibilities are not clearly defined and change; job rotation is practiced; and responsibilities are overlapping. Open access to the person in charge seems to improve work motivation and lead to an esprit de corps. Thinking about this makes perfect sense. Complaining to your boss in a casual company is like a nice talk in a pub. It gives you the feeling your criticism, and you, are taken seriously, and by being able to go to the person in charge you feel it is the first step in turning around a bad situation. Once companies become larger and open access to the person in charge is no longer possible, workers can no longer direct 33 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LEADERSHIP - 2000-2001 their complaints to top management. Immediate superiors, who should be the person to talk to about suggestions and criticism, are busy meeting their performance targets. They do not appreciate people complaining and view complainants as potential sources of trouble.
    [Show full text]
  • Worcester Issues – BRP/CERO
    T H E C OMMONWEALTH O F M ASSACHUSETTS E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E O F E N E R G Y A N D E NVIRONMENTAL A FFAIRS Department of Agricultural Resources 251 Causeway Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02114 617-626-1700 fax: 617-626-1850 www.mass.gov/agr PUBLIC HEARINGS: VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Pursuant to the Rights-of-Way Management Regulations (333 CMR 11.00) in order to apply pesticides to control vegetation to maintain Rights-of Ways, the Department of Agricultural Resources must approve a Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) and a Yearly Operational Plan (YOP). The VMP is intended to justify the need to control vegetation, identify target vegetation, describe the intended methods of control, describe methods for identifying sensitive areas, describe operational guidelines for applicators, outline a program of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) designed to reduce the use of herbicides, and describe alternative land use activities. The following municipalities are advised that the Massachusetts Railroad Association representing Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Grafton & Upton Railroad, Housatonic Railroad Company, Massachusetts Central Railroad, Massachusetts Coastal Railroad, New England Central Railroad Incorporated, Pioneer Valley Railroad and Providence and Worcester Railroad Company proposes to utilize herbicides to treat their Rights-of-Way. AMTRAK Attleborough, Dedham, Mansfield, Westwood, Boston, Foxborough, Sharon, Canton, Longmeadow. Springfield GRAFTON & UPTON RAILROAD Grafton, Hopedale, Milford, Upton HOUSATONIC
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Transportation
    4. Transportation Introduction & Existing Conditions KEY FINDINGS Natick’s transportation system comprises roadway and rail transportation routes that serve local needs as well as major regional connections. Many of these + Natick’s natural and man- transportation corridors connect to other towns and destinations throughout the made geography create bar- Boston area and New England as a whole. riers to transportation access, especially for local traffic, Natick’s long history and historic center have helped to make it an important pedestrians, and bicyclists. transportation node from its early days. Natick has a robust and well-developed transportation network, especially its regional roadway network and commuter + Traffic is concentrated onto transit system. As a suburb of Boston, much of Natick’s transportation system is heavily used corridors, such oriented toward the Boston core. This is evident in the configuration of the regional as Route 27, Route 135, roadways and the commuter rail line through town. Speen Street, and Route 9, that have high levels of con- The purpose of this existing conditions assessment is to evaluate the transportation gestion and crashes. system in Natick, with a focus on summarizing the existing transportation infrastructure and traffic conditions in the Town. The study process entailed the following elements: + Transit ridership on MBTA commuter rail service from West Natick Station and + Assess the existing roadway, public transportation facilities, bicycle and pedes- Natick Center Station is rising. trian facilities in Natick. + Collect Traffic Impact Assessment reports, Functional Design Reports and other + There is good sidewalk cov- erage and pedestrian access transportation studies in Natick and compile the data and findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing Fedex Teamsters Gear up to Deliver Victory to Fedex Workers in THIS ISSUE 2 TEAMSTER NEWS
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS JULY/AUGUST 2009 TEAMSTERwww.teamster.org Organizing FedEx Teamsters Gear Up To Deliver Victory To FedEx Workers IN THIS ISSUE 2 TEAMSTER NEWS • Teamsters Trained To Protect Against Terrorism • Airline Division Saves United Airlines Jobs Organizing FedEx • U.S. Foodservice Victory Teamsters Gear Up To Deliver Victory • Teamsters End Stalemate To FedEx Workers In Buffalo • Infrastructure Gains To Benefi t Rail Teamsters Hope On The Horizon • Local 237 Political Mechanics And Related At Horizon Forum A Success Air Join Teamsters 14 • Teamster Leader Plays Himself In Film “Milk” Maximum Security 3,200 Cook County Corrections 20 ORGANIZING Offi cers Join Local 714 • Waste Workers Join Local 311 • Local 997 Welcomes Pension Tension Bakery Workers Is A Comfortable Retirement A Thing • Donut Delivery Drivers Of The Past? Join Local 25 • Walden Police Choose Teamsters Horse Sense • Alabama Truckers Carriage Drivers Get In Touch Join Local 402 With Their Roots 16 30 COURT MATERIALS 22 United And Determined TEAMSTER 2009 Unity Conference Focuses On Organizing, Political Victories www.teamster.org International Brotherhood of Teamsters 25 Louisiana Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20001-2198 202-624-6800 The Teamster (ISSN 1083-2394) is the official publica- tion of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 25 Louisiana Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20001-2198. It is published six times a year in January/February, March/April, May/June, July/August, September/ October, November/December. Periodical postage paid at Washington, DC and at additional mailing offices. JULY/AUGUST 2009 / VOLUME 106, NO. 4 © 2009 International Brotherhood of Teamsters. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without writ- ten permission is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Maine State Rail Plan
    Draft Maine State Rail Plan TABLE OF CONTENTSview Chapter 1 Framework of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.1 Purpose of the State Rail Plan 1.1 1.2 Visions, Goals, Objectives of the Maine State Rail Plan 1.3 1.3 Transportation and Rail Planning in Maine 1.6 . Figure 1-1: MaineDOT Organizational Chart 1.7 . Figure 1-2: Maine’s MPO Areas 1.10 . Figure 1-3: Regional Planning and Development Councils 1.11 1.4 Public and Stakeholder Involvement 1.12 1.5 Review of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning Studies 1.17 1.6 Evaluation Criteria 1.18 Chapter 2 Freight Rail System 2.1 Overview 2.1 . Figure 2-1: North American Class I Rail Connections 2.2 . Figure 2-2: Map of MM&A Abandonment 2.6 . Figure 2-3: State of Maine Owned Rail Status 2.10 2.2 Freight Rail Industry Development 2.10 2.3 Maine’s Freight Railroad Facilities 2.12 2.4 International, National and Regional Context 2.21 . Figure 2-4: Canadian Class I Connections to Maine System 2.21 . Figure 2-5: Northeast U.S. Rail Freight System 2.22 . Figure 2-6: NS, CP, PAS and PAR Corridors 2.23 . Figure 2-7: Railroad Return on Investment and Cost of Capital 2.24 2.5 Freight Rail Issues and System Constraints 2.24 . Figure 2-8: Estimated National Highway System Peak-Period Congestion 2.25 . Figure 2-9: Estimated Rail Freight Service Levels, 2035 2.25 . Figure 2-10: Rail Clearance and Weight Constraints 2.28 .
    [Show full text]