Jigawa State Government Due Process and Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JIGAWA STATE GOVERNMENT DUE PROCESS AND PROJECT MONITORING BUREAU LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNOR END OF THE YEAR REPORT, 2010 i CONTENTS - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - CHARTS SECTION(A) - COMPLETED PROJECTS SECTION (B) -ON-GOING PROJECTS SECTION (C) - PRE-CONTRACT EVALUATION SECTION (D) - CONTRACTS AWARDED SECTION (F) - APPENDIX-SECTOR BASED REPORTS ROAD/DRAINAGE PROJECTS WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS ELECTRIFICATION PROJECTS BUILDING PROJECTS JIGAWA STATE GOVERNMENT ii DUE PROCESS AND PROJECT MONITORING BUREAU LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT END OF YEAR REPORT JANUARY-DECEMBER, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In line with the present administration’s commitment to entrench probity, transparency, accountability and value for money in the discharge of it’s obligations to the people of the state, the Executive Governor of Jigawa State Alh. Sule Lamido directed for the establishment of local government unit in Due Process & Project Monitoring Bureau in His 2010 budget speech. The Unit which is now fully operational as mandated by law is responsible for coordinating the implementation of all capital projects of the 27no. Local government councils in the state. However, to date some local governments namely; Sule Tankarkar, Garki, Hadejia, Kazaure, Kiri-Kasamma and Kafin-Hausa Local Government Councils have defied the provision of the law section {schedule II (2.6)} which stipulates that all capital projects above Three Million Naira(N3,000,000.00) shall be vetted by the Due Process and Project Monitoring Bureau (DPPMB) to ensure compliance with laid down rules and regulations before award and must be certified by same for payment. Nevertheless effort of other local government councils like Buji, B/Kudu, Miga, Gwaram, Gwiwa, Kiyawa and Yankwashi deserve commendation as they always try to abide by the provision of the Due Process law as much as possible. The report contained details of progress achieved by each of the 27No. Local Government Councils, based on the information made available to the Bureau and verified, within 2010 financial year. Furthermore, it is worth noting that this is a maiden edition of iii the report as such in the near future it will be made comprehensive as the local governments realise and appreciate its importance. The main objective of the report is to enlighten all stakeholders with the activities of 27 No local government councils as it relates to implementation of capital projects within the period under review to enable government consider corrective measures where necessary. The report consist of four sections, namely; Completed projects, On going projects, Pre-contract evaluation and Contracts awarded within the period under review. COMPLETED PROJECTS: This Section Contains Information on Projects Completed 100% by each local government council as at December,2010..A total of 141 No projects Valued at N1,567,376,866.43 Billion are Completed. ON-GOING PROJECTS: This Section deals with projects that have reached various stages of Completion. A total of N2,634,045,549.97 Billion worth of projects were recorded as on-going. PRE-CONTRACT EVALUATION: This Section gives account of proposals presented by only 21 out of 27no.Local Government Councils to the Bureau for Vetting and recommendation. A total of N1,541,253,713.03 Billion worth of proposals were presented for Vetting out of which the Bureau recommends N 1,492,655,276.95.Saving the sum of N48,599,436.08.(3.15%) of the total proposals to the government. CONTRACT AWARDED: In this section no data was received from any local government council stating the contract awarded with dates by each local government council. iv OBSERVATION: It has been observed with dismay that some local government councils, since the inauguration of this Unit in June 2010 have not submitted any document or proposals to the Bureau for Vetting. The local governments referred are as follows: Sule Tankarkar, Hadejia, Kafin-Hausa, K/Kasamma, Kazaure and Garki which contradicts the law provision. Furthermore, there is no proper documentation on proposals from local government councils, which requires urgent attention, as such lead to delays in processing submissions. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION: Finally the following recommendation is forwarded to enable the local government councils improve their performance. 1. All project proposals should be adequately planned and submitted on time for clearance with Bureau, prior to the time of implementation. 2. All proposals submitted to the Bureau for vetting should be accompanied with the relevant documents i.e. B.O.Q, Drawings, Structural drawings, services drawings, etc for speedy response. 3. All contracts awarded by each Local Government Council should be forwarded for certification to the Bureau before any payment is made as provided by the Law. ................................................. .................................................. JIBRIN KAWU ADO HUSSAINI DIRECTOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DIRECTOR GENERAL v SUMMARY OF PROJECTS REPORTED JANUARY-DECEMBER,2010 S/NO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPLETED(N) ON-GOING (N) PROCUREMENT TOTAL (N) 1. AUYO 34,859,411.13 117,407,747.58 152,267,158.71 2. BABURA 3,004,808.00 53,226,624.00 56,231,432.00 3. BIRNIWA 88,128,722.73 169,361,134.28 257,489,857.01 4. BIRNIN-KUDU 45,412,146.00 379,417,087.17 424,829,233.17 5. BUJI 161,820,110.56 155,061,515.00 316,881,625.56 6. DUTSE 20,636,180.75 162,981,252.50 183,617,433.25 7. GAGARAWA 22,585,165.25 4,280,722.95 26,865,888.20 8. GARKI 46,434,035.62 15,753,738.51 62,187,774.13 9. GUMEL 141,425,331.63 141,425,331.63 10. GURI 6,950,000.00 59,892,524.79 66,842,524.79 11. GWARAM 541,300,930.95 541,300,930.95 12. GWIWA 88,222,728.28 20,920,932.62 109,143,660.90 13. HADEJIA 24,401,757.50 24,401,757.50 14. JAHUN 79,193,096.81 79,193,096.81 15. KAUGAMA 31,121,383.20 64,326,675.00 95,448,058.20 16. KAZAURE 61,965,960.11 61,965,960.11 17. KAFIN-HAUSA 23,397,501.02 154,891,126.90 178,288,627.92 18. KIRI-KASAMMA 38,745,813.68 38,745,813.68 19. KIYAWA 148,660,867.96 3,144,852.00 151,805,719.96 20. MALAM-MADORI 75,369,379 75,369,379.00 21. MAIGATARI 92,934,836.27 20,032,511.2 112,967,347.47 22. MIGA 160,085,551.48 160,085,551.48 23. RINGIM 8,403,547.15 8,403,547.15 24. RONI 140,559,477.59 179,496,408.07 320,055,885.66 25. SULE-TANKARKAR 127,476,638.07 127,476,638.07 26 TAURA 286,583,011.48 286,583,011.48 27 YANKWASHI 107,887,592.94 107,887,592.94 TOTAL 1,567,376,866.43 2,634,045,549..97 4,201,422,436.40 vi SUMMARY OF PROJECTS REPORTED JANUARY-DECEMBER,2010 VALUE(N) 1. PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT 2. PRE-CONTRACT EVALUATION ( QUOTED ) 1,541,253,713.03 3. PRE-CONTRACT EVALUATION (DPPMB RECOMM.) 1,492,655,276.95 4. SAVINGS 48,598,436.08 5. APPROVED CAPITAL BUDGET 6. CONTRACT AWARDED JANUARY-DECEMBER,2010 7. SURPLUS vii CHARTS JANUARY-DECEMBER,2010 viii ix x xi xii xiii xiv .