DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of High Conservation Values Within Vicforests' Eastern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of High Conservation Values Within Vicforests' Eastern Annexure A Assessment of High Conservation Values within VicForests’ eastern Forest Management Unit 16 August 2019 Preface VicForests presents this assessment of High Conservation Values (HCVs) within its Forest Management Unit (FMU) in eastern Victoria, based on a review of the presence and extent of HCVs identified at the FMU level, using the current FSC® National Forest Stewardship Standard for Australia, in mid-2019. The purpose of this assessment is two-fold: 1. To inform stakeholders of VicForests’ assessment of HCVs within its eastern FMU; and 2. To inform VicForests’ planning functions and guide more detailed assessments at the operational level, to confirm the presence and extent of HCVs and determine appropriate prescriptions to ensure these HCVs are retained and protected. It is important to highlight that this assessment is subject to ongoing changes and updates. Valid changes and updates to this HCV assessment may be required to incorporate: • New data on conservation values, e.g. classifications and detections for threatened species, new mapping for forest types and forest structures derived from ongoing Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) based assessments, or changes to land tenure or land use allocations; • Further changes in the applicable FSC® standards and interpretations for assessing HCVs – noting that in July 2019, FSC® Australia released an updated version of its HCV Evaluation Framework; for use in the context of conforming to Controlled Wood standards (Version 1-0, June 2019); • Further changes in the regulatory framework, e.g. the anticipated review of the Code of Practice for Timber Production 2014 within the next 12 months; and • Further inputs from stakeholders on HCV assessments and VicForests’ management systems – recognising the FSC® national standard and HCV evaluation framework require consultation with relevant stakeholders where applicable on the presence and threats to HCVs with respect to the evaluated supply areas. VicForests also notes the Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) modernisation process in Victoria incorporates an ongoing Forest Values Assessment that is seeking to capture and incorporate the latest robust science, to ensure Victoria’s forests are resilient and current management practices are adaptive to a changing climate. As part of this assessment, the Victorian Government Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) is undertaking: • a landscape scale survey program for: threatened species; updated habitat distribution models; and conducting population viability analysis; • an update of mapping of old growth forests and rainforests; including a major new acquisition of LiDAR data for East Gippsland and areas of the Central Highlands not captured in 2015; • updated assessments of a range of other ecosystem service, economic, social and community forest values. Delivery of the DELWP research program is underway and will continue through 2020. Therefore, this HCV assessment should be viewed as guidance to the identification of HCVs at the FMU level; which will be complemented by more detailed assessments at the local landscape level and coupe level, and additional information as it becomes available over time. 1 Annexure A Table of Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................... 1 VicForests’ Forest Management Unit .......................................................................................... 3 FMU level assessment of High Conservation Values ................................................................. 4 1 HCV 1 Species diversity ...................................................................................................... 6 1.1 HCV 1 values ............................................................................................................... 6 1.2 HCV 1 definitions ......................................................................................................... 6 1.3 VicForests’ HCV 1 assessment .................................................................................... 6 1.4 VicForests’ HCV 1 management controls ................................................................... 15 2 HCV 2 Landscape level ecosystems and mosaics............................................................. 18 2.1 HCV 2 definitions ....................................................................................................... 18 2.2 VicForests’ HCV 2 assessment .................................................................................. 19 2.3 VicForests’ HCV 2 management controls ................................................................... 23 3 HCV 3 Ecosystems and habitats ....................................................................................... 25 3.1 HCV 3 definitions ....................................................................................................... 25 3.2 VicForests’ HCV 3 assessment .................................................................................. 26 3.3 VicForests’ HCV 3 management controls ................................................................... 33 4 HCV 4 Critical ecosystem services .................................................................................... 36 4.1 HCV 4 definitions ....................................................................................................... 36 4.2 VicForests’ HCV 4 assessment .................................................................................. 36 4.3 VicForests’ HCV 4 management controls ................................................................... 43 5 HCV 5 Community needs .................................................................................................. 46 5.1 HCV 5 definitions ....................................................................................................... 46 5.2 VicForests’ HCV 5 assessment .................................................................................. 46 5.3 VicForests’ HCV 5 management controls ................................................................... 47 6 HCV 6 Cultural values ....................................................................................................... 48 6.1 HCV 6 definitions ....................................................................................................... 48 6.2 VicForests’ HCV 6 assessment .................................................................................. 49 6.3 VicForests’ HCV 6 management controls ................................................................... 56 Appendix 1 – Threatened flora and fauna species within VicForests’ eastern FMU .................. 59 Appendix 2 - HCV management plans ...................................................................................... 69 Example of proposed management plan - Threatened species ............................................. 69 Example of proposed management plan - Special Management Area .................................. 71 2 Annexure A VicForests’ Forest Management Unit The Forest Management Unit (FMU) to conform to FSC® Controlled Wood standard encompasses the Allocation Area made available to VicForests under the Allocation Order 2013, as amended in 20141 and in 20192, as well as other forest management zones that permit timber harvesting. Outside of the Allocation Area VicForests may operate in accordance with a duly authorised forest produce licence issued under section 52 of the Forests Act 1958 by the responsible minister or delegate. VicForests is seeking conformance to FSC® Controlled Wood standard for its operations in eastern Victoria, and the broad extent of its FMU east of the Hume Highway encompasses around 1.82 million hectares (ha) of State forest; with key timber species groupings comprising Ash species, High elevation mixed species, Low elevation mixed species and Coastal mixed species. The timber resources vested to VicForests in the Allocation Area (working forest area), for the purpose of sustainable harvest, regrowing, tending and commercial sale of timber on behalf of the Victorian Government, comprises approximately 228,000 ha of Ash forest and 1,587,000 ha of Mixed Species forest. This area excludes protected areas including national parks and conservation reserves, and Special Protection Zones (SPZs), as defined by the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) in the Forest Management Zoning (FMZ) scheme (Plate 1). Plate 1: VicForests’ FMU in eastern Victoria Source: VicForests 1 Victoria Government Gazette (2014) Allocation (Amendment) Order 2014. No. S 405 Thursday 30 October 2014. 2 Agriculture Victoria (2019) Timber Allocation Order. Accessed online 1/6/19: http://agriculture.vic.gov.au/agriculture/forestry/timber-allocation-order 3 Annexure A FMU level assessment of High Conservation Values VicForests has assessed the extent of High Conservation Values (HCVs) at the FMU level, for its eastern FMU, through a desktop assessment. The results of this assessment are presented below. This assessment of values at the FMU level will be complemented by field verification and local stakeholder feedback as part of systematic coupe planning processes that include pre-harvest surveys and targeted species surveys. This assessment utilised the FSC® National Forest Stewardship Standard of Australia (FSC®- STD-AUS-01-2018 EN)3 and the data types listed in FSC® Australia’s Data Directory of Information Sources4. These
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 25 NO. 11 PP 54366200018 DECEMBER 2001 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bill Dear Cathy Houston Telephone: 82962111 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT David Pettifor Tel. 014095457 COMMITTEE David Hirst Thelma Bridle Bob Bates Malcolm Guy EDITOR: TREASURER Gerry Carne Iris Freeman 118 Hewitt Avenue Toorak Gardens SA 5061 Telephone/Fax 8332 7730 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia
    NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALIA NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA JOURNAL Volume 6, No. 10, November, 1982 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. SBH 1344. Price 40c PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian PRESIDENT: Mr J.T. Simmons SECRETARY: Mr E.R. Hargreaves 4 Gothic Avenue 1 Halmon Avenue STONYFELL S.A. 5066 EVERARD PARK SA 5035 Telephone 32 5070 Telephone 293 2471 297 3724 VICE-PRESIDENT: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven COMMITTFE: Mr R. Shooter Mr P. Barnes TREASURER: Mr R.T. Robjohns Mrs A. Howe Mr R. Markwick EDITOR: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven NEXT MEETING WHEN: Tuesday, 23rd November, 1982 at 8.00 p.m. WHERE St. Matthews Hail, Bridge Street, Kensington. SUBJECT: This is our final meeting for 1982 and will take the form of a Social Evening. We will be showing a few slides to start the evening. Each member is requested to bring a plate. Tea, coffee, etc. will be provided. Plant Display and Commentary as usual, and Christmas raffle. NEW MEMBERS Mr. L. Field Mr. R.N. Pederson Mr. D. Unsworth Mrs. P.A. Biddiss Would all members please return any outstanding library books at the next meeting. FIELD TRIP -- CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE The Field Trip to Peters Creek scheduled for 27th November, 1982, and announced in the last Journal has been cancelled. The extended dry season has not been conducive to flowering of the rarer moisture- loving Microtis spp., which were to be the objective of the trip. 92 FIELD TRIP - CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE (Continued) Instead, an alternative trip has been arranged for Saturday afternoon, 4th December, 1982, meeting in Mount Compass at 2.00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Central Native Vegetation Plan
    © North Central Catchment Management Authority 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the North Central Catchment Management Authority. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Community Engagement, North Central Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 18, Huntly Vic 3551. Telephone: 03 5448 7124 ISBN 0 9578204 0 2 Front cover images: David Kleinert, North Central Catchment Management Authority Back cover images: Adrian Martins, Paul Haw, David Kleinert All other images: North Central Catchment Management Authority North Central Catchment Management Authority PO Box 18 Huntly Vic 3551 Telephone: 03 5448 7124 Facsimile: 03 5448 7148 www.nccma.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the North Central Catchment Management Authority (CMA) and its employees do not guarantee that the information contained in this publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes. The North Central Catchment Management Authority therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on the contents of this publication. The North Central CMA Native Vegetation Plan is Ministerially endorsed. The plan outlines the framework for native vegetation management in the North Central region, describes the strategic direction for native vegetation and includes the regional approach to Net Gain. ii Acknowledgements The completion of the North Central Native Vegetation Plan has been assisted by funding from the Catchment and Water Division of DSE (formerly NRE) and Environment Australia through the Natural Heritage Trust (Bushcare).
    [Show full text]
  • Intro Outline
    THE REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF TWO TERRESTRIAL ORCHIDS, CALADENIA RIGIDA AND CALADENIA TENTACULATA RENATE FAAST Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide, South Australia December, 2009 i . DEcLARATION This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution to Renate Faast and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis (as listed below) resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australasian Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through web search engines. Published works contained within this thesis: Faast R, Farrington L, Facelli JM, Austin AD (2009) Bees and white spiders: unravelling the pollination' syndrome of C aladenia ri gída (Orchidaceae). Australian Joumal of Botany 57:315-325. Faast R, Facelli JM (2009) Grazrngorchids: impact of florivory on two species of Calademz (Orchidaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57:361-372. Farrington L, Macgillivray P, Faast R, Austin AD (2009) Evaluating molecular tools for Calad,enia (Orchidaceae) species identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Threats to Endangered Orchids of Victoria, Australia
    Selbyana 26(1,2): 189-195. 2005. MAJOR THREATS TO ENDANGERED ORCHIDS OF VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA MICHAEL DUNCAN* Flora Ecology Research, Arthur Rylah Institute, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia 3084. Email: [email protected] ANDREW PRITCHARD Department of Sustainability and Environment, 78 Henna Street, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia 3280. FIONA COATES Flora Ecology Research, Arthur Rylah Institute, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia 3084. ABSTRACT. Endangered terrestrial orchids in the public network of parks and reserves, on private land, along roadsides, and in small vegetation remnants in Victoria, Australia, face a range of threats. These include weed invasion, grazing by invertebrates and native and introduced herbivores, road maintenance, and small population size resulting from habitat fragmentation. In addition, these areas have been affected often and adversely by altered fire regimes or hydrology, introduced pathogens, mini ng and forestry activ­ ities, recreational activities, and site disturbance. Many species are under threat of illicit collection, and many suffer from inadequate public understanding of basic orchid biology, of conditions required for seedling recruitment, and of the need to maintain specific pollinators and mycorrhizal fungi. Key words: Orchidaceae, threats, endangered, Victoria, conservation INTRODUCTION facing terrestrial orchids in Victoria include land clearing, habitat fragmentation and small popu­ The state of Victoria, in the southeast corner lation size, weed invasion, grazing by inverte­ of Australia, contains a diverse orchid flora with brates and native and introduced herbivores, site more than 370 taxa recognized. Orchids are disturbance, mining, forestry, recreational activ­ among Victoria's natural treasures and must be ities, altered fire regimes or hydrology, and in­ counted among its most threatened assets (Back­ troduced pathogens, These threats are com­ house & Jeanes 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Boneseed Management Manual
    Boneseed management manual Current management and control options for boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. monilifera) in Australia Edited by KJ Brougham, H Cherry & PO Downey Weeds of National Significance August 2006 This manual is sponsored by the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and the Department of Environment and Conservation NSW This publication is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. It is not intended to provide, nor does it constitute, expert advice. Readers are warned against relying solely on the information contained herein. Further professional advice should be sought before acting on the information supplied in this manual. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this publication, neither the Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, nor its staff accept any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission, or from the use of the information contained herein. For further information contact: Pest Management Unit Parks and Wildlife Division Department of Environment and Conservation NSW PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW 1481 Phone: 1300 361 967 This manual was produced as part of the Weeds of National Significance Program, and is available for free download from the Weeds Australia Website <www.weeds.org.au/WoNS/bitoubush>. Published by: Department of Environment and Conservation NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DEC 2006/390 ISBN 1 74137 975 X August 2006 This publication should be cited as: Brougham, KJ, Cherry, H and Downey, PO (eds) (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice Pterostylis Despectans Lowly Greenhood
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this Conservation Advice on 16/12/2016 . Conservation Advice Pterostylis despectans lowly greenhood Conservation Status Pterostylis despectans (lowly greenhood) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Species can also be listed as threatened under state and territory legislation. For information on the listing status of this species under relevant state or territory legislation, see http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl The main factors that are the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the Endangered category are its restricted and fragmented distribution; and its declining population due to continuing threats. Description The lowly greenhood (Orchidaceae) is a herbaceous perennial geophyte that remains dormant underground as a tuber from late summer into early winter. In late winter (May to June) it develops a rosette of six to ten basal leaves and three or four stem-sheathing bract-like leaves above (DSE 2014; OEH 2014; Quarmby 2010). The rosette leaves are 10 - 20 mm long and 6 - 9 mm wide. The flower stem is produced between late October and December and the leaves shrivel up by the time the flowers mature. The flower stem is up to 80 mm tall, though often only reaching 20 - 30mm, with scaly bracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Boneseed, Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Subsp
    This document was originally published on the website of the CRC for Australian Weed Management, which was wound up in 2008. To preserve the technical information it contains, the department is republishing this document. Due to limitations in the CRC’s production process, however, its content may not be accessible for all users. Please contact the department’s Weed Management Unit if you require more assistance. ������������� ����������������� � ������������������������������������������������������ ISSN 1442-7192 Boneseed, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera Taxonomy and status Botanical name: Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies monilifera (L.) T. Norl. (synonym: Osteospermum moniliferum subsp. moniliferum) - Family Boneseed flowers. Asteraceae (daisy family). Photo: K. Blood. Standard common name: boneseed. Relationship to other species in Australia: The introduced weed bitou bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. Figure 1. Boneseed flowers, immature fruit rotundata is the only close relative. There and leaf shoot. are no closely-related indigenous species. Photo: K. Blood. Legislation: Boneseed is declared noxious in all States and Lord Howe Island. It is listed as Boneseed differs from bitou bush by its upright a Weed of National Significance in Australia. growth habit (versus the sprawling habit of Boneseed infestation. Keep up to date with the latest legislation bitou bush), less rounded and more obviously Photo: K. Blood. through local and State/Territory government toothed leaves (Figure 2), flowers with less weed agencies or on the web at 'petals' (5-8 for boneseed versus 11-13 for www.weeds.org.au bitou bush) and round, smooth seeds (versus usually smaller and darker egg-shaped ribbed seeds for bitou bush) (Figure 3). Description Habitllifeform: woody erect shrub. Description: Boneseed is an upright shrub to small tree generally 1-2 m wide x 0.5-3 m high, but occasionally to 6 m tall.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Hansard No
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard No. 10, 2003 MONDAY, 8 SEPTEMBER 2003 FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—SIXTH PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE INTERNET The Journals for the Senate are available at http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/work/journals/index.htm Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard For searching purposes use http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au SITTING DAYS—2003 Month Date February 4, 5, 6 March 3, 4, 5, 6, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27 May 13, 14, 15 June 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26 August 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21 September 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18 October 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 27, 28, 29, 30 November 3, 4, 24, 25, 26, 27 December 1, 2, 3, 4 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on the following Parliamentary and News Network radio stations, in the areas identified. CANBERRA 1440 AM SYDNEY 630 AM NEWCASTLE 1458 AM BRISBANE 936 AM MELBOURNE 1026 AM ADELAIDE 972 AM PERTH 585 AM HOBART 729 AM DARWIN 102.5 FM FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—SIXTH PERIOD Governor-General His Excellency Major-General Michael Jeffery, Companion in the Order of Australia, Commander of the Royal Victorian Order, Military Cross Senate Officeholders President—Senator the Hon. Paul Henry Calvert Deputy President and Chairman of Committees—Senator John Joseph Hogg Temporary Chairmen of Committees—Senators Hon. Nick Bolkus, George Henry Brandis, Hedley Grant Pearson Chapman, John Clifford Cherry, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids
    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
    [Show full text]